Personal but not privateMathias Klang @klang67

Privatus? Complex term but “separated from the rest”

Technology as integrity threat

Right to Privacy

1948: Declaration of rights

70s: legislating integrity

90s harmonization but flawed modernization.

The threat up until this point was orwell’s nightmare

Reality today is Huxley’s nightmare

The “problems”: or why Orwell lost.

Small bits of information

Permission based

International infrastructures

Paranoid? Regulation by proxy

Only technology(spot the ethical dilemma?)

Privacy & technology

We leak information

Compartmentalization strategy

Surveillance: the Orwellian gaze from above

A Huxleyian shift

Ending the communications monopoly

Blog

ger 1

999

Goo

gle

1999

End of communications monopoly

Normalizing the abnormal

Sousveillance: A gaze from below

“friends” ensure: there is no opt-out

Autoveillance: a gaze from within

Performance lifestyle

My amazing coffee

Silly maybe, but harmful?

Village vs global village

Nothing new?

What do the people who control what we can do, think?

If you have done nothing wrong,

you have nothing to fear

The Hive-mind

The effect of banal information

Privacy will not be die suddenly of a massive leak. It’s slowly fading by analysis of public data…

Autonomy: the freedom to lose our privacy

Outing the young

Do government offices have a paternalistic role?

THANKS!

Mathias Klang klang@ituniv.se or @klang67

www.digital-rights.net

Image & licensing info in the notes section of slides.

Images at www.flickr.com (or specifically stated).

This ppt licensed: Creative Commons BY-NC-SA

Download presentation www.slideshare.net/klang