Upload
jill-emery
View
1.447
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Program presentation at ACRL on hybrid OA
Citation preview
Halfway Open or Halfway Shut?OA Hybrid Journals in Academia
Fit
Quality
Speed
Author
Not So Easily DismissedWhere to Publish?
Not a numbers game
Openness a minor consideration
Impact Factor(Influential + Imperfect)
Willingness to pay APC journal quality
Subscription journals dominate the peer reviewed, high impact pool.
APC’s for high impact open access journals on par with hybrid fees.
Choice
Oregon Health & Science University:
• 2011 7% OA• 2010 6% OA• 2009 7% OA
Activity
• Increased NIH PA enforcement• OSTP Directive• RCUK and Wellcome Trust
Mandates
PeerJ, F1000Research, eLife
Hybrid Model = Low Risk
New Models
Not So Easily DismissedPublishing Landscape
Business ModelTransitional Double Dipping Sustainability Transparency Copyright
MarketFailed Experiment? Tipping Point
Roles & ManagementUnderwriters Tracking Third Party Cost Savings?
Questions Not Assumptions
Survey Team
Robin Champieux, Scholarly Communication Librarian, Oregon & Health Science University
Jill Emery, Collection Development Librarian, Portland State University
Kasia Stasik, Regional Sales Manager, Harrassowitz
Sarah Beasley, Scholarly Communication Librarian, Portland State University
From the collections of the Mitchell Library, State Library of New South Wales www.sl.nsw.gov.au
Business Models
Tracking Adoption
Survey Goals
Number of Journals
PSU & OHSU Uptake
Original Questions
★ Overview Questions
★ OA Hybrid Costs
★ OA Hybrid discounts offered
★ OA Hybrid Marketing
Number of Articles & Growth Rates
★ Licensing models
★ Tracking Still Picture Records Section, Special Media Archives Services Division (NWCS-S), National Archives at College Park, 8601 Adelphi Road, College Park, MD, 20740-6001.
Questions Begat QuestionsFollow-Up
★ APC hybrid fee?
What does the APC represent?
★ Funding source?
Copy of your copyright agreement?
OA Hybrid Overview
Publishers Name of your hybrid OA Program
Year Began # of journals Participating (at time of survey)
Cambridge UP Cambridge Open 2007 120 out of 297 total
Elsevier Elsevier Open Access
2006 1,500 out of 2,700
Nature PG NPG Open 2007 47 out of 84
Oxford UP Oxford Open 2005 110 out of 246
Sage Publications Sage Choice 2006 200+ out of 632
Springer B.V. Springer Open Choice
2004 1,400+ out of 1,945
Taylor & Francis Group
T&F Open Select 2006 685 out of 1,600
Wiley/Blackwell Publishers
OnlineOpen 2004 743 out of 1,500
OA Hybrid Costs
Publishers OA Hybrid Costs Factors Track Source of APC
Cambridge UP STM: $2,700HSS: $1,350
Production Yes
Elsevier $3,000 Production/competitors
No
Nature PG $2,620-$5,000 Production/rejection rates/Competitors
No
Oxford UP $3,000 Production/Competitors
Yes
Sage Publications $3,000 Varies by discipline No
Springer B.V. $3,000 Production No
T&F Group $3,250 Production Yes
Wiley/Blackwell P $3,000 Not Answered No
OA Hybrid Discounts OfferedPublishers Discount Offered When Consortia Discount?
Cambridge UP Uptake has not impacted sub cost
Not applicable Not applicable
Elsevier Not explicitly given/argue OA still too small %
Not applicable No
Nature PG Global discount if over 10% or more of content in previous year OA
Started in 2010 Site license applied
Oxford UP 2013 is discounted based on 2011 OA publishing/mitigation of inflation
Started in 2009 Same as institutional discount
Sage Monitoring uptake Not yet Not applicable
Springer Significant OA uptake means discount to an institution
Not given explicitly Each consortia discount is unique
T&F Group Calculation related to % of OA in previous yr
Not given explicitly If negotiated for
Wiley/Blackwell No Not applicable Not applicable
Number of Articles & Growth Rate
Publishers # of OA Articles (at time of survey)
Growth Rate Exclusion?
Cambridge UP 363 since 2007 1% Society Preference
Elsevier 2,750 since 2007 ~8% Society Preference
Nature PG 822 since 2007 10% Partner Organizations Choice
Oxford UP 4,340 since 2007 10% in life sci3% in medicine1.5% in HSS2.5% in Math
Law Case ReportsDemand lackingSociety Preference
Sage Publications 116 since 2007 10% Society Preference
Springer B.V. 5,912 since 2009 1.1% Society Preference
T&F Group 312 since 2007 6% Society Preference
Wiley/Blackwell Publishers
1,864 since 2009 1.2% Society Preference
Number of OA Hybrid Articles
Hybrid OA Marketing
Publishers Marketing Hybrid OA
Cambridge UP Offered during article acceptance/Journal website
Elsevier Offered during article acceptance/Journal website
Nature PG Offered during article submission/Journal website
Oxford UP Offered during article submission/Journal website
Sage Publications Offered during article acceptance/Journal website
Springer B.V. Offered during article acceptance/Journal website
T&F Group Offered during article acceptance/Journal website
Wiley/Blackwell Publishers Offered during article acceptance/Journal website
OA Hybrid Licensing
Publishers License Used (at time of survey)
Cambridge UP CC-BY-SA-NC v.3.0
Elsevier Variety of CC-BY
Nature PG CC-BY-SA-NC 3.0 or CC-BY-SA-NN 3.0
Oxford UP CC-BY-NC 3.0
Sage Publications Similar to CC-BY
Springer B.V. CC-BY
T&F Group OL-BY-NC
Wiley/Blackwell Publishers Similar to CC-BY-NC
Tracking of Hybrid OA Publishing
Publishers How is Tracking Accomplished?
How Long Has it Occurred?
Can a Library get the information?
Cambridge UP Order form for main author
2007 No
Elsevier Uptake by journal/funding bodies
2006 No, open to discussion
Nature PG License tag on articles
2007 No, trying to get counter 4 stats working
Oxford UP Usage tracking 2005 On demand
Sage Publications Uptake by journal 2009 No
Springer B.V. Uptake by journal 2004 Use AuthorMapper
T&F Group Article level 2012 Institutions not consortia
Wiley/Blackwell Publishers
Uptake by journal Not answered Not answered