SK INSPIRE monitoring & reporting (2013)

Martin Tuchyňa, Marek Žiačik

04.07.2013, TAIEX Study visit on INSPIRE interoperability data sets and services

Slovak environmental agency, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia

Overview of SK INSPIRE transposition and implementation

Content

• Purpose • Legal requirements

• Monitoring• Reporting

Purpose

• INSPIRE Monitoring: – Monitoring by EÚ Member States of the implementation and use of their infra structures for spatial information– Collection of information via indicators– On annual basis (by 15th of May)

• INSPIRE Reporting– Reporting on the implementation of Directive 2007/2/EC (INSPIRE)– Via textual report with standardised structure– Each 3 years (In 2013 for period 2010-2012)

Legal requirements

• INSPIRE Directive (2007/2/EC)

• Implementing rules (Commission Decision regarding INSPIRE monitoring and reporting)

• SK Law No. 3/2010 about National spatial data infrastructure

• Decree No. 352/2011 implementing above law.

SK

EÚ

Monitoring SK Monitoring 2013 SR (http://skr.sk/acohttp://skr.sk/aco )

Bratislava Self-Governing Region State Geological Institute of Dionýz ŠtúrGeodesy, Cartography and Cadastre Authority of Slovak Republic Statistical Office of the SR

Hydromelioracie, s.p. The Monuments Board of the Slovak Republic

Košice Self-Governing Region The Slovak Museum of Nature Protection and Speleology

Ministry of Interior of SR The State Nature Conservancy of the SR

National Forest Centre Topographic Institute

Slovak Environmental Agency Vodohospodárska výstavba

Slovak Hydrometerological Institute Water Research Institute

Slovak Ground Water Management Žilina Self-Governing Region

Soil Science and Conservation Research Institute

SK Monitoring On-line web tool (http://http://inspire.gov.skinspire.gov.sk//inspire-monitoringinspire-monitoring)

Monitoring Parameter 2009 2010 2011 2012

Involved organisations 13 16 18 20

Described datasets 115 169 183 195

Described services 21 17 31 35

Datasets described by metadata (%)

33 43 89 93

IR compliant Metadata (%) 45 31 77 90

IR compliant Datasets (%) 13 10 5 10

Metadata available via services (%)

66 19 71 78

Datasets available via services (%)

44 5 5 7

Network service category (%)d – discovery, v – view,dl - download

d 33/ v 57/ dl 10

d 29/ v 59/ dl 12

d 19/ v 68/ dl 13

d 11/ v80/ dl 9

Monitoring

• Pros:– On-line web tool– Indicators calculation automatisation

• Cons: – Themes without description:

– Human health and safety– Agricultural and aquaculture facilities, – Population distribution – demography, – Meteorological geographical features, – Energy resources, – Mineral resources.

Reporting SK Reporting 2013 SR (http://http://skr.skskr.sk//acpacp)

Reporting

• Focus on:– Organisation, co-ordination and quality assurance– Contribution to the functioning and coordination of the infrastructure– Usage of the infrastructure for spatial information– Data sharing arrangements– Cost and benefit aspects

Reporting• Overall status:

– INSPIRE stepwise implementation (SK INSPIRE Report 2013)• Prons

– Transposition via new law on NSDI– Centralised coordination structures establishment– Pilot Geoportal deployed with CZ cooperation– Availability of metadata, discovery, view services– Involvement in SDI related EU projects

• Cons– Cost&benefits aspects– Data sharing harmonisation– Limited support and importance– Reduced stakeholders awareness and involvement– Limited presence of transformation services– Absence of download services

Reporting – organisation&contribution• Coordination structure:

– Established in 2010– Representation:

• Significant (Data/Service Producers)• Limited (Users)

– Themes affiliation • Stakeholders:

– High involvement• Governmental sector

– Semi involvement• Academic, Private sector

– Limited involvement• Regional and local authorities, NGOs

Reporting – infrastructure use

Reporting – infrastructure use

• User logs from 2012

Reporting – infrastructure use

• SK users distribution from 2012

Reporting• Data sharing

– Current status• Ad hoc Individual agreements• Low level of agreement’s content and structure harmonisation• Absence of SDI related licence registry

• Outlook – Licencing framework:

• Development of NSDI licence policy• Localisation and deployment of INSPIRE licences• Preparation of Grand Agreement

– Ensuring access and exchange of data sets&services

Reporting• Costs & Benefits

– Costs • Mainly quantitative • Limited amount of information available • Costs occurred with INSPIRE transposition and implmentation• Costs foreseen to be occurred in order to fulfill legal obligations (est. 12 mil.€)

– Benefits • Mainly qualitative• Main benefits foreseen:

– Time savings (for governmental bodies as well as citizens)– Budget savings– Improved tax incomes via added value services– Improved transparency, innovations, social inclusion

Thank you!

martin.tuchyna@sazp.sk

04.07.2013, TAIEX Study visit on INSPIRE interoperability data sets and services

Slovak environmental agency, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia