Statistics student sample project (1)

A STATISTICAL RESEARCH PAPER

Submitted to

Mr. Marcelo C. Mendoza

In partial Fulfillment to the requirements

In Math 22

Submitted by

Jeramiah E. FaciolBSBA-Bangking & Finance103I / 9:00-10:30am / M/W

The Race for 2013 Senatorial Election

Rationale: As I approach the May 2010 election. Our group conducted a quick survey to test the Filipinos’ maturity and integrity in choosing their candidates in our democratic institution. Thus, this project will try to determine the bet of some of our fellow countrymen for the presidential race in the May 2010 election.

Statement of the Problem: The aim of this first term statistical research project is to find out who is JRU students’ choice for president in 2010. Specifically, it will try to find the following:1] The profile of the respondents according to

a] gender

b] age

2] JRU students’ choice for president

3] Male JRU students’ choice for president

4] Female JRU students’ choice for president

5] JRU students’ perception of their candidates’ chance of winning the presidency in the 2010 election

6] Male JRU students’ perception of their candidate’s chance of winning the presidency in the 2010 election

7] Female JRU students’ perception of their candidate’s chance of winning the presidency in the 2010 election

8] JRU students’ degree of optimism that their choice for president can make a difference in the lives of Filipino

people

9] Male JRU students’ degree of optimism that their choice for president can make a difference in the lives of

Filipino people

10] Female JRU students’ degree of optimism that their choice for president can make a difference in the lives

of Filipino people

11] If there is a significant difference on the degree of optimism between male & female JRU students that their

choice for president can make a difference on the lives of Filipino people

12] If there is a significant difference on the proportion of votes garnered by ESCUDERO & VILLAR as the

JRU students’ choice for president

Hypotheses Tested: The following hypotheses were tested at 0.05 level of significance:

1] Hypothesis on mean: Our group wants to know if there is a significant difference on the average degree of optimism between male and female respondents that their choice for president can make a difference on the lives of Filipino people. Ho: µEscudero = µVillar; There is no significant difference on the average degree of optimism between JRU male and female students that their choice for president can make a difference on the lives of Filipino people. Ha: µEscudero ≠ µVillar; There is a significant difference on the average degree of optimism between JRU male and female students that their choice for president can make a difference on the lives of Filipino people.2] Hypothesis on proportion: Our group wants to know if there is a significant difference on the average degree of optimism between male and female respondents that their choice for president can make a difference on the lives of Filipino people. Ho: PEscudero = PVillar; The proportion of votes garnered by Escudero and Villar are equal. Ha: PEscudero ≠ PVillar; The proportion of votes garnered by Escudero is significantly higher than the proportion of votes garnered by Villar.

Population and Sample: The population in this research is JRU students who are enrolled this first semester SY 2008-09. Our group has estimated JRU for having 22,000 students enrolled this first semester of SY 2009-10. Using Slovin’s formula and a 5% margin of error, the required number of samples is 393. (Please see computation below.) But our professor only required us to gather 200 samples, but our group managed to gather up to 250 samples. Our group decided to use random sampling. Thus our samples are 115 randomly selected male and 135 randomly selected female UE students.

Computation for n at e = 5%

n = 392.86 or 393

Sampling and Data Gathering Techniques: Our group used simple random sampling in choosing the 250 sample respondents in this research. We also utilized the indirect or questionnaire method. The group distributed 250 questionnaires from June 25 to July 2 to UE students around the campus. Our group had contacts inside the UE campus, thus making things easier to get in touch with UE students. Having only 3 members in the group the group divided the questionnaires into 3, with 2 members having 75 questionnaires each and 1 member having 100 questionnaires. From June 25 to July 2 our group would drop by UE to randomly give out survey questionnaires to UE students, and with the help of our contacts in UE, our group was able to have access inside the UE campus, thus giving the group more respondents for the survey.

Research Design: Our research is descriptive comparative since we will be comparing the responses of male and female UE students.

Questionnaire: The questionnaire is composed of three items. The 1st item asks the respondents about their choice for president in 2010. The 2nd item asks about their choice’s chances of winning the presidency. The last item is a likert scale composed of five statements which try to assess the respondent’s degree of optimism that their choice for president can make a difference on the lives of Filipino people.

Processing of data: Below is a table which summarizes the research procedure.

Statements & hypotheses Data gathered Statistical Tools

1] the profile of respondents according to gender and age

Number of male & female respondents, Ages of respondents

Rank and percentage analysisAnalysis of Measures of central tendency and variability, skewness & kurtosis

2] UE students’ choice for president

Number of votes for each candidate Rank and Percentage analysis

3] male UE students’ choice for president

Number of votes for each candidate from male respondents

Rank and Percentage analysis

4] female UE students’ choice for president

Number of votes for each candidate from female respondents

Rank and Percentage analysis

5] UE students’ perception of their candidates’ chance of winning the presidency in the 2010 election

Mean and standard deviation Rank and Percentage analysis

6] Male UE students perception of their candidates’ chance of winning the presidency in the 2010 election


7] Female UE students perception of their candidates’ chance of winning the presidency in the 2010 election


8] UE students’ degree of optimism that their choice for president can make a difference in the lives of Filipino people

Mean and standard deviation Mean & standard deviation analysis

9] Male UE students’ degree of optimism that their choice for president can make a difference in the lives of Filipino people


10] Female UE students’ degree of optimism that their choice for president can make a difference in the lives of Filipino people


11] if there is a significant difference on the degree of optimism between male & female UE students that their choice for president can make a difference on the lives of Filipino people

Mean and standard deviation of the responses of male and female respondents

t-test for testing the significance of difference between means

12] if there is a significant difference on the proportion of votes garnered by ESCUDERO & VILLAR as UE students’ choice for president.

Number of votes garnered by Escudero & Villar.

Z-test for testing the significance of difference between proportions

Presentation, Analysis, Findings and Conclusions: The following presentations are the results of our careful analysis on the responses of the 250 UE students who participated in our research.

Statement 1: Profile of respondents:

Findings: 54% of respondents are female while 46% are male.Conclusion: Majority of the respondents are female.

Table 1: Profile of Male respondents according to Age

Findings: 26.0870% of Male respondents are 20 years of age.Conclusions: The modal age of the male respondents is 20.

Table 2: Profile of Female respondents according to AgeAge Frequency Percentage Frequency16 5 3.703717 7 5.1852

Age Frequency Percentage Frequency16 1 0.869617 7 6.087018 15 13.043519 16 13.913020 30 26.087021 13 11.304422 7 6.087023 12 10.434824 6 5.217425 2 1.739126 1 0.869628 1 0.869631 2 1.739133 1 0.869635 1 0.8696

Total N = 115

Figure1: Profile of respondents according to gender

18 13 9.629619 21 15.555620 45 33.333321 20 14.814822 4 2.963023 10 7.407424 3 2.222225 3 2.222227 2 1.481528 2 1.4815

Total N=135

Findings: 33.3333% of Female respondents are 20 years of Age.Conclusion: The modal age of the male respondents is 20.

Table 3: Profile of Total respondents according to AgeAge Frequency Percentage Frequency16 6 2.417 14 5.618 28 11.219 37 14.820 75 3021 33 13.222 11 4.423 22 8.824 9 3.625 5 226 1 0.427 2 0.828 3 1.231 2 0.833 1 0.435 1 0.4

Total N=250

Findings: 30% of the total respondents are 20 years of Age.Conclusion: The modal age of the total respondents are 20 years of Age.

Below is the printout of the descriptive statistics of the ages of male and female respondents.

Male Female

Mean 20.7826087 Mean 20.2Standard Error 0.29170652 Standard Error 0.194677662Median 20 Median 20Mode 20 Mode 20Standard Deviation 3.128203926

Standard Deviation 2.261950024

Sample Variance 9.785659802 Sample Variance 5.11641791Kurtosis 5.898893903 Kurtosis 2.059594916Skewness 2.019735766 Skewness 1.016194187Range 19 Range 12Minimum 16 Minimum 16Maximum 35 Maximum 28Sum 2390 Sum 2727

Count 115 Count 135

Findings: A: Measures of Central Tendency1] The mean age of male is 21 while that of the female is 20.2] The median age of male is 20 while that of the female is also 20.

Conclusions:The mean age of male is higher by 1 which is 21. This makes the male group older than the female. The median and modal age of both

3] The modal age of male is 20 while that of the female is also 20.

male and female are just the same.

Findings: B: Measures of Variability1] The range of the male age is 19 while that of the female is 12.2] The standard deviation of the male age is 3.13 while that of the female is 2.26.3] The variance of the male age is 9.79 while that of the female is 5.12.

Conclusions:The standard deviation and variance of the age of male is higher than that of the female age. This means that the age of male are more dispersed than the age of female.

Findings: C: Skewness & Kurtosis1] The coefficient of skewness of male age is 2.019735766 while that of the female is 1.0161941872] The coefficient of kurtosis of the male age is 5.898893903 while that of the female is 2.059594916.3] Below are the sketches of the graphs of the ages of male and female respondents:

Male:

Female:

Conclusions:The Coefficient of skewness of both male and female are skewed to the right. The Coefficient of Kurtosis on both male and female are taller than normal.

Findings: D: Other Statistics1] The minimum age of male is 16 while that of the female is also 16.2] The maximum age of male is 35 while that of the female is 28.

Conclusions:Both male and female have the minimum ago of 16 bat the maximum age, male is higher which is 35 and only 28 for the female.

Table4: Profile of respondents according to gender Statement 2: UE students’ [male & female] choice for president

Figure2: UE students’ choice for President.

The tables which follow below show the votes of each candidate arranged according to ranks.

Table 4: Ranks of candidates (male & female votes)Candidate No. of Votes Percentage Frequency Rank

Escudero, Chiz 90 36 1Villar, Manny 28 11.2 2Binay, Jejomar 25 10 4De Castro, Noli 25 10 4

Roxas, Mar 25 10 4Legarda, Loren 14 5.6 6

Fernando, Bayani 13 5.2 7Estrada, Erap 12 4.8 8.5Gordon, Dick 12 4.8 8.5Lacson, Ping 5 2 10Panlilio, Ed 1 0.4 11

Total: 250

Findings: This shows that Escudero is UE students’ choice for president in the May 2010 election.Conclusion: If this trend will continue, then Escudero will win the 2010 election among UE students.

Statement 3: Male UE students’ choice for president

Figure 3: Male UE students’ choice for President.

Table 4: Ranks of candidates (male votes)Candidate No. of Votes Percentage Frequency Rank

Escudero, Chiz 37 32.17391 1Villar, Manny 15 13.04348 2

De Castro, Noli 12 10.43478 3Roxas, Mar 11 9.565217 4

Estrada, Erap 10 8.695652 5Fernando, Bayani 9 7.826087 6

Binay, Jejomar 8 6.956522 7Legarda, Loren 6 5.217391 8Gordon, Dick 4 3.478261 9Lacson, Ping 2 1.73913 10Panlilio, Ed 1 0.869565 11

Total: 115

Findings: Escudero garnered the most number of votes from the UE male students’.Conclusion: This shows that Escudero is male UE students’ choice for the May 2010 election.

Statement4: Female UE students’ choice for president.

Figure 4: Female UE students’ choice for President.

Table 5: Ranks of candidates (female votes)Candidate No. of Votes Percentage Frequency Rank

Escudero, Chiz 53 39.25926 1Binay, Jejomar 17 12.59259 2

Roxas, Mar 14 10.37037 3De Castro, Noli 13 9.62963 4.5Villar, Manny 13 9.62963 4.5Gordon, Dick 8 5.925926 6.5

Legarda, Loren 8 5.925926 6.5Fernando, Bayani 4 2.962963 8

Lacson, Ping 3 2.222222 9Estrada, Erap 2 1.481481 10Panlilio, Ed 0 0 11

Total: 135

Findings: Escudero garnered the most number of votes from the UE female students’.Conclusion: This shows that Escudero is female UE students’ choice for the May 2010 election.

Statement 5: UE students’ perception of their candidates’ chance of winning the presidency in the 2010 election.

Below is the mean interpretation used:1.0 - 1.7 No Chance of Winning1.8 - 2.5 Slim Chance of Winning2.6 - 3.3 50/50 Chance of Winning3.4 - 4.1 Good Chance of Winning4.2 - 5.0 Sure Winner

Table6: Percentage chance of winning the election [Male & Female]Candidate Sure

Winner(4)

Good Chance

(3)

50/50 Chance

(2)

Slim Chance

(1)

No Chance

(0)

Mean Mean Interpretation

Escudero, Chiz 4 68 15 3 0 2.81 50/50 Chance of WinningVillar, Manny 2 21 3 1 1 2.79 50/50 Chance of WinningBinay, Jejomar 1 12 11 1 0 2.52 Slim Chance of WinningDe Castro, Noli 7 12 6 0 0 3.04 50/50 Chance of Winning

Roxas, Mar 2 18 4 1 0 2.84 50/50 Chance of WinningLegarda, Loren 1 10 3 0 0 2.86 50/50 Chance of Winning

Fernando, Bayani 0 1 8 4 0 1.77 Slim Chance of WinningEstrada, Erap 3 9 0 0 0 3.25 50/50 Chance of WinningGordon, Dick 1 7 3 1 0 2.67 50/50 Chance of WinningLacson, Ping 0 2 2 1 0 2.2 Slim Chance of WinningPanlilio, Ed 0 0 1 0 0 2 Slim Chance of Winning

Findings: Escudero,Villar, De Castro, Roxas, Legarda, Estrada and Gordon all got a mean score between 2.6 - 3.3 and is equivalent to the mean interpretation 50/50 chance of winning. While Binay, Fernando, Lacson and Panlilio all got a mean score between 1.8 - 2.5 and is equivalent to the mean interpretation slim chance of winning.Conclusion: UE students perceived that Escudero,Villar, De Castro, Roxas, Legarda, Estrada and Gordon has a 50/50 chance of winning the 2010 election. While Binay, Fernando, Lacson and Panlilio has a slim chance of winning the 2010 election.

Statement 6: Male UE students’ perception of their candidates’ chance of winning the presidency in the 2010 election

Table 7: Male UE students’ perception of their candidates’ chance of winning the presidency in the 2010 election.

Candidate Sure Winner

(4)

Good Chance

(3)

50/50 Chance

(2)

Slim Chance

(1)

No Chance

(0)


Escudero, Chiz 0 27 8 2 0 2.68 50/50 Chance of WinningVillar, Manny 0 11 3 0 1 2.6 50/50 Chance of Winning

De Castro, Noli 2 6 4 0 0 2.83 50/50 Chance of WinningRoxas, Mar 0 9 2 0 0 2.82 50/50 Chance of Winning

Estrada, Erap 3 7 0 0 0 3.3 50/50 Chance of WinningFernando, Bayani 0 1 4 4 0 1.67 No Chance of Winning

Binay, Jejomar 0 4 3 1 0 2.38 Slim Chance of WinningLegarda, Loren 0 5 1 0 0 2.83 50/50 Chance of WinningGordon, Dick 0 1 2 1 0 2 Slim Chance of WinningLacson, Ping 0 1 1 0 0 2.5 Slim Chance of WinningPanlilio, Ed 0 0 1 0 0 2 Slim Chance of Winning

Findings: Escudero, Villar, De Castro, Roxas, Estrada and Legarda all got a mean score between 2.6 - 3.3 and is equivalent to the mean interpretation 50/50 chance of winning. Binay, Gordon, Lacson and Panlilio all got a mean score between 1.8 - 2.5 and is equivalent to the mean interpretation slim chance of winning. Fernando got a mean score of 1.67 and is equivalent to the mean interpretation no chance of winningConclusion: Male UE students’ perceived that Escudero, Villar, De Castro, Roxas, Estrada and Legarda has a 50/50 chance of winning the election. And Binay, Gordon, Lacson and Panlilio has a slim chance of winning the election. While Fernando has no chance of winning the election.

Statement 7: Female UE students’ perception of their candidates’ chance of winning the presidency in the 2010 election

Table 8: Female UE students’ perception of their candidates’ chance of winning the presidency in the 2010 election.

Candidate Sure Winner

(4)

Good Chance

(3)

50/50 Chance

(2)

Slim Chance

(1)

No Chance

(0)


Escudero, Chiz 4 41 7 1 0 2.91 50/50 Chance of WinningBinay, Jejomar 1 8 8 0 0 2.59 50/50 Chance of Winning

Roxas, Mar 2 9 2 1 0 2.86 50/50 Chance of WinningDe Castro, Noli 5 6 2 0 0 3.23 50/50 Chance of WinningVillar, Manny 2 10 0 1 0 3 50/50 Chance of WinningGordon, Dick 1 6 1 0 0 3 50/50 Chance of Winning

Legarda, Loren 1 5 2 0 0 2.88 50/50 Chance of WinningFernando, Bayani 0 0 4 0 0 2 Slim Chance of Winning

Lacson, Ping 0 1 1 1 0 2 Slim Chance of WinningEstrada, Erap 0 2 0 0 0 3 50/50 Chance of Winning

Findings: Escudero, Binay, Roxas, De Castro, Villar, Gordon, Legarda and Estrada all got a mean score between 2.6 - 3.3 and is equivalent to the mean interpretation 50/50 chance of winning. While Fernando and Lacson got mean scores ranging from 1.8 - 2.5 and is equivalent to the mean interpretation slim chance of winning.Conclusion: Female UE students’ perceived that Escudero, Binay Roxas, De Castro, Villar, Gordon, Legarda and Estrada will have a 50/50 chance of winning the 2010 election. While Fernando and Lacson will have a slim chance of winning the election.

Statement 8: UE students’ degree of optimism that their choice for president can make a difference in the lives of Filipino people.

Below is the mean interpretation used:2.0 - 1.7 Very pessimistic that s/he can make a difference

1.8 - 2.5 Pessimistic that s/he can make a difference2.6 - 3.3 Not sure if s/he can make a difference3.4 - 4.1 Optimistic s/he can make a difference4.2 - 5.0 Very optimistic s/he can make a difference

Table 9: Combined responses of UE Male & Female respondents.

Statement 5 4 3 2 1 Mean SDev.Mean

Interpretation1] My candidate can eradicate graft & corruption in government.

48 90 80 22 10 3.58 1.02 Optimistic

2] My candidate can alleviate poverty. 35 104 82 22 7 3.55 0.94 Optimistic

3] My candidate can restore trust in government.

67 97 60 20 6 3.80 1.00 Optimistic

4] My candidate can improve the economy.

61 103 57 21 8 3.75 1.02 Optimistic

5] My candidate can solve the insurgency.

37 97 90 18 8 3.55 0.94 Optimistic

Total/Grand Mean/Sd 248 491 369 103 39 3.64 0.99 Optimistic

Findings: UE students are optimistic that if Escudero will win, corruption will be solved, poverty can be eradicated, trust in government can be restored, the economy will improve, and insurgency can be solved. Overall, they are optimistic that their candidate will make a difference in the lives of the Filipino people.Conclusions: UE students are optimistic that if Escudero wins he can make a difference in the lives of the Filipino people.

Statement 9: UE Male students’ degree of optimism that their choice for president can make a difference in the lives of Filipino people.

Table 10: Responses of UE Male respondents.

Statement 5 4 3 2 1 Mean SDevMean

Interpretation

1] My candidate can eradicate graft & corruption in government.

23 39 33 15 5 3.52 1.09 Optimistic

2] My candidate can alleviate poverty. 18 41 41 11 4 3.50 0.99 Optimistic3] My candidate can restore trust in government.

32 46 22 11 4 3.79 1.06 Optimistic


25 47 26 11 6 3.64 1.09 Optimistic


17 37 46 8 7 3.43 1.03 Optimistic


Findings: Male UE respondents are optimistic that if Escudero will win, corruption will be solved, poverty can be eradicated, trust in government can be restored, the economy will improve, and insurgency can be solved. Overall, they are optimistic that Escudero will make a difference in the lives of the Filipino people.Conclusions: Male UE students are optimistic that Escudero can make a difference in the lives of the Filipino people.

Statement 10: UE Female students’ degree of optimism that their choice for president can make a difference in the lives of Filipino people

Table 11: Responses of UE Female respondents.

Statement 5 4 3 2 1 Mean SDevMean

Interpretation1] My candidate can eradicate graft & corruption in government.

25 51 47 7 5 3.62 0.97 Optimistic

2] My candidate can alleviate poverty. 17 63 41 11 3 3.59 0.89 Optimistic

3] My candidate can restore trust in government.

35 51 38 9 2 3.8 0.95 Optimistic


36 56 31 10 2 3.84 0.95 Optimistic


20 60 44 10 1 3.65 0.85 Optimistic


Findings: Female UE respondents are optimistic that if Escudero will win, corruption will be solved, poverty can be eradicated, trust in government can be restored, the economy will improve, and insurgency can be solved. Overall, they are optimistic that Escudero will make a difference in the lives of the Filipino people.Conclusion: Female UE students are optimistic that Escudero can make a difference in the lives of the Filipino people.

Statement 11: if there is a significant difference on the degree of optimism between male & female UE students that their choice for president can make a difference on the lives of Filipino people.

Below is the PHStat printout for testing the significance of difference between mean responses of male and female respondents.

Data

Hypothesized Difference 0Level of Significance 0.05

Population 1 Sample Sample Size 115Sample Mean 3.58Sample Standard Deviation 1.05

Population 2 Sample Sample Size 135Sample Mean 3.7Sample Standard Deviation 0.93

Intermediate CalculationsPopulation 1 Sample Degrees of Freedom 114Population 2 Sample Degrees of Freedom 134Total Degrees of Freedom 248Pooled Variance 0.974119Difference in Sample Means -0.12t-Test Statistic -0.95812

Two-Tailed Test Lower Critical Value -1.96958Upper Critical Value 1.969576p-Value 0.338934

Do not reject the null hypothesis

Following is the 5-step solution: 1] Ho: µMale = µFemale; There is no significant difference on the degree of optimism between male and female UE students that their choice for president can make a difference on the lives of Filipino people. Ha: µMale ≠ µFemale; There is a significant difference on the degree of optimism between male and female UE students that their choice for president can make a difference on the lives of Filipino people.2] ; p-Value = 0.3389343] Decision Rule: Reject Ho if p-Value(0.338934) < α(0.05)4] Decision: Do no reject Ho because p-Value(0.338934) > α(0.05)5] Conclusion: There is no significant difference on the degree of optimism between male and female UE students that their choice for president can make a difference on the lives of Filipino people.

Statement 12: if there is a significant difference on the proportion of votes garnered by Escudero & Villar as UE students’ choice for president.

Below is the PHStat printout for testing the significance of difference between the number of votes garnered by Escudero and Villar as the respondents 1st choice for president.

DataHypothesized Difference 0Level of Significance 0.05

Group 1 Number of Successes 90Sample Size 250

Group 2 Number of Successes 28Sample Size 250

Intermediate CalculationsGroup 1 Proportion 0.36Group 2 Proportion 0.112Difference in Two Proportions 0.248Average Proportion 0.236Z Test Statistic 6.529862051

Upper-Tail Test Upper Critical Value 1.644853627p-Value 3.29151E-11Reject the null hypothesis

Following is the 5-step solution: 1] Ho: pEscudero = pVillar; There is no significant difference on the proportion of votes garnered by Escudero and Villar. Ha: pEscuero > pVillar; The proportion of votes garnered by Escudero is significantly higher than the proportion of votes garnered by Villar.2] ; p-Value = 03] Decision Rule: Reject Ho if p-Value(0.0000000000329151) < α(0.05)4] Decision: Reject Ho because p-Value(0.0000000000329151) < α(0.05)5] Conclusion: The proportion of votes garnered by Escudero is significantly higher than the proportion of votes garnered by Villar.

INFERENCE: If this trend will continue, and if election is held today and the voters are only UE students then Escudero is a sure winner.

SELF EVALUATION FORMOn a scale of 1-10, with 10 being the highest, please rate your participation in the completion of your group project. Justify your ratings by completing the table below. Everyone should agree with each one’s self-ratings. If a member is absent today (August 14, 2009), the Leader, with the consent of all the members who are present should give the ratings.

______Plus One______GROUP NAME

Surname, Name Role Rating Justification Signature

1] Quijano, Mark AnthonyLeader 10

I wasn’t really the original leader of the group, but when our original leader dropped out of class, and as Co-Leader I had to take over as the leader of the group, and I did my part as the new leader of the group by closely monitoring the progress of our research work.

2] Santos, Robert Co-Leader 10Well, I did my part as I could, but I all thanks to the leader who keeps the group intact.

3] Catabran, Michael Analyzer 10

I took part on the research specifically the tallying of votes, hypothesis testing, conclusions from findings and 5-step solution on the last part. Also rechecked the whole project itself.

INDIVIDUAL REFLECTION

MY ELEMSTA EXPERIENCE

Leader: Mark Anthony Quijano_I learned a lot in my ELEMSTA class, and I know these things will help me out in the next subjects that I will be taking up in the next semesters, surveying for example will be helpful when I do feasibility studies, and in my course Export Management that will have a big factor when I start doing my thesis. Also things were made easier for us by our professor so the research work wasn’t really that hard. But overall my ELEMSTA class was a learning experience.Co-Leader:_Robert Santos_ELEMSTA for me is a good learning experience. It gave me an idea on how to gather data, it could even help me in the future when I finish my college years, the subject to me is challenging yet fun, it feeds me idea on how I could survey on things, well I could even use it on my years here at CSB. The most thing that’s why I really love ELEMSTA is we can choose where we want to survey so we could go to the place and really survey people and meet new ones. I really felt the importance of this subject, it really opened my eyes on things how people really gather data here and else where, with the help of our professor I really learned a lot.Analyzer:_Michael Catabran_My experience in ELEMSTA is fast and easy one. There was some difficulty on some lessons but most of the time, it was mostly easy to understand. I didn’t expect ELEMSTA to be this easy as I’m not that good in math but thanks to an excellent method of teaching it wasn’t a problem.

Technology

Statistics student sample project (1)