Upload
irc
View
743
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Citation preview
04/09/23
Sustainability Checks:
Godfrey, S. van der Velden, M., Muianga, A. Xavier, A. 1 Water and Environmental Sanitation Section, UNICEF
five year annual sustainability audits of
the water supply and ODF status in the
One Million Initiative, Mozambique
Introduction 1
04/09/232
1. LOW WATER SUSTAINABILITY - UN Water GLASS (2012) indicates ODA for WASH increased in absolute terms by 3% from 2008 to 2011 to USD 7.8 billion (UN Water 2012) - only 7% of the overall investment was allocated to maintaining and sustaining existing infrastructure.
2. LIMITED INFORMATION ON SANITATION SUSTAINABILITY 1. WSP (2011) 90% of households in 53 Union Parashads in Bangladesh
owned and used a latrine 6 years after being declared ODF2. Chakma et al (2008) evaluated ODF under the Government of India
Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC) and noted 79% of households continued to use latrines one year after being declared ODF
3. Pattanayak et al (2009) notes that increasingly donors and aid agencies have broadened their narrow focus on physical infastructure to sustainable service provision.
4. WaterAid (2011), who note in their Frameworks for Sustainability broader definition of sustainability which notes that to ensure lasting impact on the public health of beneficaries of water supply and sanitation services, a greater emphasis on the “service” component of service delivery is required.
Introduction 2
04/09/23
1. SUSTAINABILITY CLAUSE Government of the Netherlands – UNICEF
partnership with aim of 90% sustainability of water supply and ODF communities 2 years post programme
Discussion on potential sustainability clause for 10 years post programme sustainability
1. GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS Government of Mozambique and Development
Partners SWAp (PRONASAR) enforces SWA High Level Meeting (2012) commitments to increase % of functioning rural water supply schemes from 50% to 70%.
Case Study
Government of the Netherlands –
Government of Mozambique
UNICEF
ONE MILLION INITIATIVE
90% Sustainability > 2 years post programme
04/09/234
Case Study: ONE MILLION INITIATIVE
Case Study: The One Million Initiative
04/09/235
Water & sanitation infrastructure examined
Boreholes with Hand Pumps (‘Water Points’)
Open Defecation Free (ODF) Communities (triggered by CLTS)
04/09/236
04/09/232012 Water &Health Conference7
Concurrent implementation monitoring Post-implementation
monitoring
Design of the Sustainability Check
04/09/238
Sample Selection
04/09/239
Primary Stratification:50% of target districts (18/2 = 9 districts)No
Province District
1 Tete Zumbo, Marávia and Changara2 Manica Manica, Mossurize and Machaze3 Sofala Dondo, Maríngue and Chemba
Statistical Frame adapted from Howard et al (2004) RADWQ
Secondary Stratification:Random selection of villages from district databaseSI=Tc/NWhere:SI is the sampling intervalTc is the total number of rehabilitated or new water sources and ODF communitiesN is the total number of applied districts
Year Total Number of Water Sources
Number of Districts
Sample Interval
Sample Size
2008 141 9 16 522009 205 9 23 52 2010 241 9 27 552011 535 9 59 522012 769 9 85 75
Data Collection
04/09/2310
TOOL 1 TOOL 2 TOOL 3 TOOL 4
Focus group discussion and semi-structured interview with the district administrator and government and non-government - INSTITUTIONAL INDICATORS
Physical inspection of the water supplies and meetings with the community water committees - SOCIAL, TECHNICAL, FINANCIAL INDICATORS
Physical inspection of the communities declared ODF - SANITATION
Household survey in 10% (max 35) of selected latrines in ODF households - SANITATION
Sustainability: Outcomes & Determining Factors
04/09/2311
Sustainability Check Report Card (2008-2012)
04/09/2312
*WC
=W
ate
r C
om
mit
tee;
OD
F =
Open D
efe
cati
on F
ree
Iyer et al (2006); SKAT (2007)
Muhkerjee et al (2003)
Hoko et al (2006)
Hoko et al (2006)
Data Scoring /Aggregation and Analysis
04/09/2313
The data collected for each sub group had a determined weightage - e.g. district with 3 communities and results of 10 % of insufficient, 40 % of satisfactory and 50 % of good :
2x10 % + 6x40 % + 8x50 % = 0,2+2,4+4 = 6,6
The composite of these indicators, were categorised into the following 5 percentage categories. 5 4 3 2 1
Very Good
Good Fair Poor Very Poor
Percentage
>90% 76-90% 51-75% 51-75% <50%
The composite of these indicators, were categorised into the following 5 percentage categories.
Management Memo/ Audit Statement
• Annual external audit of constructed water points and open-defecation-free (ODF)communities
• Measure multiple dimensions of sustainability – technological, financial, socio-economic, institutional – ratings on five-point scale
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Sustainability Check Results
Overall 2008-2012(weighted)
04/09/2315
Sustainability Check Results
SANITATION
04/09/2316
Conclusions
04/09/2317
SC provides annual “snapshots” (not continuous) on the functionality and use of water and sanitation infrastructure and the ODF status of communities
SC is both an “interprogramme” and “post-programme” monitoring tool
SC has proven to be an effective bottleneck analysis instrument for achieving sustainability
Off the Shelf tools required to enable integration into PRONASAR and government systems using SMS/smartphone technology
04/09/232012 Water &Health Conference18
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
UNICEF Mozambique•The WASH section•Dr. Sam Godfrey•Matteus van der Velden•Americo Muianga•Angelina Xavier
© UNICCEF Mozambique/2011/Rada