Upload
syawalianto-rahmaputro
View
603
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Citation preview
1
Comparison Between Landfill Gas and Waste Incineration for Power Generation in Accra, Ghana
Serwaa ANAGLATE
Syawalianto RAHMAPUTRO
Carlos RUIZ
Prof. Luis Rojas
PM3E
2
Outline
Accra
Objective & Scope
RETScreen
Waste Characterization
Landfill Gas
Waste Incineration
Results
Social Impact
Conclusions
Outlook
3
Source: http://raklak.wordpress.com
Source: World Bank, 2010
Accra, Ghana
Source: World Bank, 2010
1,800 Daily Tons of Waste
Open Dump Sites
Insufficient Waste Collection
Insufficient Power Capacity Source: www.atokd.com
4
Objective & Scope
Objective
Assess and compare landfill gas and waste incineration
Technical
Environmental
Economic
Social Impact
Scope
Total Electricity Exported
GHG Emissions Reduction
Approximate Costs
Financial Summary
Pre-feasibility Level
5
RETScreen®
Free Software
Clean Energy Project Analysis
Inexpensive Technical and Financial Feasibility Analysis
Energy Model
Cost Analysis
GHG Analysis
Financial Summary
Sensitivity & Risk
Analysis
6
Waste Characterization
66%
17%
6%3% 3% 3%
2%
Organic Inert Paper Plastic Glass Metal Textile & Leather
7
Landfill Gas
Source: Affiliated Engineers, 2010
8
Landfill Gas Simulation
Assumptions: Constant Biodegradable Fraction in
Waste
50% of CH4 by Volume
75% Collection Efficiency
Climatic Conditions
Waste Composition
Amount of Waste
𝑄𝐶𝐻4=𝑘∗𝐿𝑜∗𝑚𝑖∗𝑒−𝑘𝑡
Input Parameter Value
Waste Disposal Rate (mi) 270,000 t/yr
Landfill Opening Year 2014
Landfill Closing Year 2044
Generation Constant (k) 0.06 yr-1
Generation Potential (Lo) 170 m3/t
6MW
9
Waste IncinerationElectricityGeneration
Waste Incinerator
Flue GasTreatment
Receiving Area
Receiving Pit
Grate Furnace
Boiler
Source: www.valorena.fr
Pretreatment - Drying in the receiving pit.
Furnace - Moving grate furnace is the most robust.
Energy Recovery - Low-pressure steam boiler is convenient when energy recovery is designed for electricity use only (Haukohl, J., Rand, T., & Marxen, R. ,1999)
Energy Production - Rankine cycle with steam turbine, condenser, boiler, and pump for power generation.
Flue Gas Treatment - For 600 ton to 900 ton/day: SNCR, semi-dry scrubber, activated carbon, and a bag house filter are usually used (Kuo, Lin, Chen, Tseng, & Wey, 2011).
Source: www.sick.com
10
Waste Incineration Simulation
1
2
3
Power Generatio
n
Fuel Potential
Waste Analysis
WASTE INCINERATION
Waste Feed Rate 270,000 t/yr
Dry Weight of Feed Waste
120,727.12 t/yr
Feeding Rate 13.78 t/hr
Lower Heating Value
15.854 GJ/t
POWER SYSTEM
Availability 8,401 hours
Back Pressure
5.6 kPa
Steam Temp. 380 °C
Return Temp. 90 °C
Steam Flow 68,600 kg/hr
Operating Pressure
80 bar
Turbine Efficiency
75 %
31%
55%
14%
Combustibles Moisture Ash
Combustibles
Moisture
Ash
Proximate Analysis
Ultimate Analysis
Predefined:• Udomsri, Petrov, Martin, & Fransson, 2011• Suggested values from RETScreen
Simulation:Energy Model
Fuel Potential 218.49 Gj/hr
Fuel Required 218 Gj/hr
11
Results – Energy and Environment
WI energy output > 8 times that of LFG
GHG reductions are achieved in both technologies
LFG GHG reductions > 6 times that of WI
Technology
Emission Factor (Kg/GJ) Annual GHG Reduction (tCO2)CO2 CH4 N2O
Landfill Gas 0 0.0040 0.00010 273,657
Waste Incineration 29.43 0 0.00315 41,413.4
TechnologyLandfill Gas
Waste Incineration
Engine Power Capacity (kW)
6,000 16,505.24
Electricity Exported (MWh/yr)
48,000 138,658
Energy Mix in Ghana:• Hydro Power 67.6%• Thermal Power 32.4%
Source: www.siemenspowergeneration.com
Source: www.engineeringnews.co.za
Electricity Export Rate - $ 58.7
12
Cost Breakdown Landfill Gas WI
Initial Cost
Engineering $ 1,050,000 $ 3,743,026
Power System $ 10,455,025 $ 7,512,749
Balance of System $ 3,630,152 $ 23,679,131
Total Initial Cost $ 15,135,177 $ 34,934,905
Annual Cost and Debt Payment
O&M $ 1,531,000 $ 5,460,225
Debt Payment (10 yr) $ 1,028,193 $ 2,373,267
Total Annual Cost $ 2,559,193 $ 7,833,492
Annual Income $ 2,817,600 $ 8,139,215
Results - Financial
Landfill Gas rendered better profitability
Since Ghana is a developing country, affordability is important
Financial Results
Landfill Gas WI
IRR 8.1% 4.8%
Payback Period 13.2 15.9 years
Annual Income $2,817,600 $8,139,215
Net Present Value (NPV)
$4,612,086 $826,358
Benefit-Cost Ratio 1.61 1.05
-20,000,000
-15,000,000
-10,000,000
-5,000,000
0
5,000,000
10,000,000
15,000,000
20,000,000
25,000,000
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
LFG Waste Incineration
Project Year
Cash
Flo
w (
US
D)
Accumulated Cash Flow
Inflation Rate – 3%
Discount Rate – 4.5%
Debt Interest Rate – 6%
Electricity Export Escalation – 2%
13
Social Impact
Job Creation
Improvement of the City’s Image
Improved Sanitation
Productivity Increase
Source: www.rvg-ghana.com
Source: Schah Fekri, 2011
Source: Journalists for Human Rights, 2010
14
Conclusion & Outlook
Both technologies are environmentally friendly and economically feasible.
Any solution would represent a great improvement.
LFG is preferred due to its outstanding environmental performance.
WI is more suitable in case of limited space.
Risk and sensitivity analysis are recommended.
Inclusion of carbon credits should be considered.
Further on-site tests should be carried out.
15
Thank you.
Pictures in cover page courtesy of:•www.treehugger.com•Graham Turner (http://www.guardian.co.uk)•www.sick.com
Any Questions?