47
WHY LOST FOAM ? Presented by Karel Cermak

Why lost foam

  • Upload
    mossss

  • View
    1.262

  • Download
    9

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Description of the Lost Foam Casting process and explanation of what makes the Lost Foam Casting Process preferable to other forms of casting techniques.

Citation preview

Page 1: Why lost foam

WHY LOST FOAM ?

Presented by Karel Cermak

Page 2: Why lost foam

1.CASTING TOLERANCES ARE SMALLER

• DIMENSION [mm]• < 25 • 25 to 80• 80 to 125• 125 to 175• 175 to 250• > 250• Rough guide <175

>175

• TOLERANCE [+/-mm]• 0.17

• 0.25

• 0.30

• 0.43

• 0.003 per mm

• 0.002 per mm

• 0.50

• 0.80

Page 3: Why lost foam

2.NO CORES ARE REQUIRED

• LARGE DESIGN FREEDOM

• “CONTROLLABLE” WALL THICKNESS

• NO CHAPLETS

• NO FINS

• NO MISMATCH

• NO CORE DEFECTS

• NO SAND MIX PROBLEMS

Page 4: Why lost foam

3.NO PARTING LINES

• NO DEMOLD DRAFT

• SEVERAL LAYERS POSSIBLE

• DOWNSPRUE AND RISERS CAN BE POSITIONED OPTIMALLY

• NO MISMATCH OR FINS

Page 5: Why lost foam

4.COMBINATION/CONSOLIDATION OF PARTS

IS POSSIBLE

• “GLUE INSTEAD OF FASTENERS”

• DECISIONS IN THE EARLY DESIGN PHASES ENABLE A HIGH ADDED VALUE TO BE ACHIEVED

Page 6: Why lost foam

• Al-alloy ( 319 T5 )

• 11.8 kg.

• 490 x 330 x 135

• Semi-Permanent mold and cores

• Lighter

• Reduced machining

• No fettling

• Higher productivity

• Smoother

• Product performance

• Combination.

– Fewer parts

• Less leaks

• Reduced machining

• Fewer fasteners

• Reduced assembly

• Fewer seals

CYLINDER HEAD 16 V

SATURN / GM1200 PER DAY

IN-HOUSE FOUNDRY

so far 1.7 million castings produced

Page 7: Why lost foam

• Al-alloy (319 T5)

• 18.2 kg.

• 435 x 445 x 280

• Semi-Permanent mold and cores

• Lighter

• Reduced machining

• Reduced fettling

• Higher productivity

• Smoother

• Product performance

• Combination

– Fewer parts

• Less leaks

• Reduced machining

• Fewer fasteners

• Reduced assembly

• Fewer seals

• Tooling costs

ENGINE BLOCK

SATURN / GM / 1.9 l / 124 PS1,200 PER DAY

IN-HOUSE FOUNDRY

so far 1.7 million castings produced

Page 8: Why lost foam

• Al-alloy

• 22 kg.

• 600 x 300 x 400.

• Die-cast with salt cores

• Lighter

• Reduced machining

• Reduced fettling

• Higher productivity

• Smoother

• Product performance

• Combination

– Fewer parts

• Less leaks

• Reduced machining

• Fewer fasteners

• Reduced assembly

• Fewer seals

• Tooling costs

ENGINE BLOCK V6

MERCURY MARINE300 PER DAY

IN-HOUSE FOUNDRY

Page 9: Why lost foam

• Al-alloy

• 12.4 kg.

• 400 x 300 x 350

• No comparison possible

• Lighter

• Reduced machining

• Reduced fettling

• Higher productivity

• Smoother

• Product performance

• Combination

– Fewer parts

• Less leaks

• Reduced machining

• Fewer fasteners

• Reduced assembly

• Fewer seals

• Tooling costs

ENGINE BLOCK V2

KOHLER OHC / 16 PS350 PER DAY

INTERMET

Page 10: Why lost foam

OIL COOLER

IVECO300 PER DAY

ALUMINIUM DONGO

• Al 319.

• 2.5 kg.

• 250 x 150 x 30

• Semi-Permanent mold and cores

• Lighter

• Reduced machining

• Less fettling

• Higher productivity

• Product performance

• Combination

– Fewer parts

• Less leaks

• Reduced machining

• Fewer fasteners

• Reduced assembly

• Fewer seals

Page 11: Why lost foam

INTAKE MANIFOLD

FIAT3,500 PER DAY

ALUMINIO DONGO

• Al 319.

• ca. 5 kg.

• 280 x 220 x 50

• Semi-Permanent mold and cores

• Lighter

• Reduced machining

• Less fettling

• Higher productivity

• Product performance

• Combination

– Fewer parts

• Less leaks

• Reduced machining

• Fewer fasteners

• Reduced assembly

• Fewer seals

so far 3.5 million castings produced

Page 12: Why lost foam

CYLINDER HEAD

FIAT - FIRE ENGINE - PUNTO 1600 PER DAY

ALUMINIO DONGO

• Al 319.

• 12 kg.

• 370 x 140 x 120

• Semi-Permanent mold and cores

• Lighter

• Reduced machining

• Less fettling

• Higher productivity

• Smoother

• Product performance

• Combination

– Fewer parts

• Less leaks

• Reduced machining

• Fewer fasteners

• Reduced assembly

• Fewer seals

• Tooling costs

Page 13: Why lost foam

INTAKE MANIFOLD

GM-OPEL CORSA1,200 PER DAY

ALUMINIUM DONGO

• Al- alloy.

• 2.45 kg.

• 260 x 220 x 190.

• Comparison difficultSand casting?

• Lighter

• Reduced machining

• Less fettling

• Higher productivity

• Smoother

• Product performance

• Combination

– Fewer parts

• Less leaks

• Reduced machining

• Fewer fasteners

• Reduced assembly

• Fewer seals

• Tooling costs

Page 14: Why lost foam

INTAKE MANIFOLD

FORD 2.3 l / 4 Cyl.1,200 PER DAY

INTERMET

• Al - alloy

• 5.2 kg.

• 450 x 220 x 85.

• Semi- Permanent mold and cores

• Lighter

• Reduced machining

• Less fettling

• Higher productivity

• Smoother

• Product performance

• Combination

– Fewer parts

• Less leaks

• Reduced machining

• Fewer fasteners

• Reduced assembly

• Fewer seals

• Tooling costs

Page 15: Why lost foam

• Al-alloy

• 12 kg.

• 450 x 420 x 180.

• Sand casting and cores

• Lighter

• Reduced machining

• Less fettling

• Higher productivity

• Smoother

• Product performance

• Combination

– Fewer parts

• Less leaks

• Reduced machining

• Fewer fasteners

• Reduced assembly

• Fewer seals

• Tooling costs

GEAR HOUSING

SAUER SUNDSTRAND220 PER DAY

WILLARD INDUSTRIES

Page 16: Why lost foam

FMC250 PER DAY

WILLARD INDUSTRIES

• Al-alloy

• 1.04 kg.

• 139 x 125

• Comparison difficult

• Lighter

• Reduced machining

• Less fettling

• Higher productivity

• Smoother

• Product performance

• Combination

– Fewer parts

• Less leaks

• Reduced machining

• Fewer fasteners

• Reduced assembly

• Fewer seals

• Tooling costs

CLUSTER HUB

Page 17: Why lost foam

• Al-alloy

• 0.7 kg.

• 90 x 90 x 32.

• Die-cast

• Lighter

• Reduced machining

• Less fettling

• Higher productivity

• Smoother

• Product performance

• Combination

– Fewer parts

• Less leaks

• Reduced machining

• Fewer fasteners

• Reduced assembly

• Fewer seals

• Tooling costs

HEATED COVER

XXXX1,000 PER DAY

INTERMET

Page 18: Why lost foam

HYDRAULIC HOUSING

SAUER SUNDSTRAND210 PER DAY

WILLARD INDUSTRIES

• Al- alloy

• 13 kg.

• 350 x 200 x 200.

• Sand casting and cores

• Lighter

• Reduced machining

• Less fettling

• Higher productivity

• Smoother

• Product performance

• Combination

– Fewer parts

• Less leaks

• Reduced machining

• Fewer fasteners

• Reduced assembly

• Fewer seals

• Tooling costs

Page 19: Why lost foam

• Al-alloy

• 2.8 kg.

• 350 150 x 150.

• No comparison possible

• Lighter

• Reduced machining

• Less fettling

• Higher productivity

• Smoother

• Product performance

• Combination

– Fewer parts

• Less leaks

• Reduced machining

• Fewer fasteners

• Reduced assembly

• Fewer seals

• Tooling costs

SUCTION PIPE

MERCEDES BENZ200 PER DAYHANDTMANN

Page 20: Why lost foam

ALUMINIUM FAILURES

• Wrong product choice

• Reluctance to adapt design

• Underestimation of development costs

• Inexperience

Page 21: Why lost foam

• Al-alloy

• 0.78 kg.

• 190 x 170 x 130.

• Semi-Permanent mold and cores

• Lighter

• Reduced machining

• Less fettling

• Higher productivity

• Smoother

• Product performance

• Combination

– Fewer parts

• Less leaks

• Reduced machining

• Fewer fasteners

• Reduced assembly

• Fewer seals

• Tooling costs

SUPPORT/CARRIER

FLOP 1

Page 22: Why lost foam

• Al-alloy

• 5.1 kg.

• 300 x 300 x 310

• Semi-Permanent mold and cores

• Lighter

• Reduced machining

• Less fettling

• Higher productivity

• Smoother

• Product performance

• Combination

– Fewer parts

• Less leaks

• Reduced machining

• Fewer fasteners

• Reduced assembly

• Fewer seals

• Tooling costs

CYLINDER HEAD

FLOP 2

Page 23: Why lost foam

• Al-alloy

• 1,1 kg.

• 110 x 220

• Welded part

• Lighter

• Reduced machining

• Less fettling

• Higher productivity

• Smoother

• Product performance

• Combination

– Fewer parts

• Less leaks

• Reduced machining

• Fewer fasteners

• Reduced assembly

• Fewer seals

• Tooling costs

EXHAUST PIPE

FLOP 3

Page 24: Why lost foam

DUCTILE IRON• PROs

– No fixed mold process available - very good accuracy

– All parts, like for Al, pourable

– Cleaning room cost savings greater than for Al

– Environmentally cleaner than sand casting processes

• CONs– The process is

sensitive to uncontrolled carbon pickup

Page 25: Why lost foam

• GGG 60 ( US 0.7060)

• 11.34 kg.

• 450 x 200

• Mask tool & 9 cores

• Lighter

• Reduced machining

• Less fettling

• Higher productivity

• Smoother

• Product performance

• Combination

– Fewer parts

• Less leaks

• Reduced machining

• Fewer fasteners

• Reduced assembly

• Fewer seals

• Tooling costs

CRANK SHAFT

SATURN / GM1,200 PER DAY

IN-HOUSE FOUNDRY

Page 26: Why lost foam

• GGG 50 / 60

• 4.2 kg.

• 150 x 140

• Sand casting with cores

• Lighter

• Reduced machining

• Less fettling

• Higher productivity

• Smoother

• Product performance

• Combination

– Fewer parts

• Less leaks

• Reduced machining

• Fewer fasteners

• Reduced assembly

• Fewer seals

• Tooling costs

DIFFERENTIAL CASE

SATURN / GM1,200 PER DAY

IN-HOUSE FOUNDRY

Page 27: Why lost foam

• GGG 40

• 11.1 kg.

• 250 x 200 x 160

• Sand casting with cores

• Lighter

• Reduced machining

• Reduced fettling

• Higher productivity

• Smoother

• Product performance

• Combination

– Fewer parts

• Less leaks

• Reduced machining

• Fewer fasteners

• Reduced assembly

• Fewer seals

• Tooling costs

SPRING HANGER A

VOLVO - GM HEAVY TRUCK240 PER DAY

CITATION FOAM CASTING COMPANY

Page 28: Why lost foam

SPRING HANGER B

VOLVO - GM HEAVY TRUCK240 PER DAY

CITATION FOAM CASTING COMPANY

• GGG 40

• 13.4 kg.

• 280 x 200 x 160

• Sand casting with cores

• Lighter

• Reduced machining

• Reduced fettling

• Higher productivity

• Smoother

• Product performance

• Combination

– Fewer parts

• Less leaks

• Reduced machining

• Fewer fasteners

• Reduced assembly

• Fewer seals

• Tooling costs

Page 29: Why lost foam

• GGG

• 12.3 kg.

• 400 x 250 x 160.

• Sand casting with cores

• Lighter

• Reduced machining

• Reduced fettling

• Higher productivity

• Smoother

• Product performance

• Combination

– Fewer parts

• Less leaks

• Reduced machining

• Fewer fasteners

• Reduced assembly

• Fewer seals

• Tooling costs

CLAMP GUIDE

XXXXX200 PER DAY

CITATION FOAM CASTING COMPANY

Page 30: Why lost foam

• GGG 40

• 5.9 kg.

• 260 x 230 x 220.

• Sand casting with cores

• Lighter

• Reduced machining

• Reduced fettling

• Higher productivity

• Smoother

• Product performance

• Combination

– Fewer parts

• Less leaks

• Reduced machining

• Fewer fasteners

• Reduced assembly

• Fewer seals

• Tooling costs

SUPPORT / CARRIER

MERCEDES BENZ, COMPR. MOTOR120 PER DAY

CITATION FOAM CASTING COMPANY

Page 31: Why lost foam

DUCTILE IRON FAILURES• Wrong product

choice

• Reluctance to adapt design

• Underestimation of development costs

• Inexperience

Page 32: Why lost foam

• GGG !!!

• 2.0 kg.

• 280 x 300

• Sand casting & 4 cores

• Lighter

• Reduced machining

• Reduced fettling

• Higher productivity

• Smoother

• Product performance

• Combination

– Fewer parts

• Less leaks

• Reduced machining

• Fewer fasteners

• Reduced assembly

• Fewer seals

• Tooling costs

STATOR FRAME

EXPERIMENT

Page 33: Why lost foam

• GGx-highly magnetic

• 0.8 kg

• from 80 to 140 mm x 70

• No comparison possible

• Lighter

• Reduced machining

• Reduced fettling

• Higher productivity

• Smoother

• Product performance

• Combination

– Fewer parts

• Less leaks

• Reduced machining

• Fewer fasteners

• Reduced assembly

• Fewer seals

• Tooling costs

EL.-MAGN. CLUTCH FOR CAR A/C - ROTOR

EXPERIMENT

Page 34: Why lost foam

GRAY IRON

• Thinner hard iron surface

• More even solidification– Reduced stress

• Quicker machining

• Increased machine tool life

Page 35: Why lost foam

• GG

• 10 - 80 kg

• up to 800 x 1000

• Sand casting with cores

• Lighter

• Reduced machining

• Reduced fettling

• Higher productivity

• Smoother

• Product performance

• Combination

– Fewer parts

• Less leaks

• Reduced machining

• Fewer fasteners

• Reduced assembly

• Fewer seals

• Tooling costs

STATOR FRAMESIEMENS, ABB, BALDOR, DIEZ

CA.1000 PER DAYCITATION FOAM, VSETIN

Page 36: Why lost foam

ELECTRIC MOTOR END SHIELD

BALDOR40 PER DAY

CITATION FOAMS

• GG

• 12 kg.

• 400 x 100

• Sand casting and cores

• Lighter

• Reduced machining

• Less fettling

• Higher productivity

• Smoother

• Product performance

• Combination

– Fewer parts

• Less leaks

• Reduced machining

• Fewer fasteners

• Reduced assembly

• Fewer seals

• Tooling costs

Page 37: Why lost foam

• GG 25.

• 4.5 kg.

• 360 x 200 x 130.

• Sand casting

• Lighter

• Reduced machining

• Reduced fettling

• Higher productivity

• Smoother

• Product performance

• Combination

– Fewer parts

• Less leaks

• Reduced machining

• Fewer fasteners

• Reduced assembly

• Fewer seals

• Tooling costs

WATER INLET / COMPONENT BRACKET

CUMMINS ENGINE CO180 PER DAY

CITATION FOAM CASTING COMPANY

Page 38: Why lost foam

• GG 40

• 22 kg

• 600 x 300 x 100.

• Sand casting with cores

• Lighter

• Reduced machining

• Reduced fettling

• Higher productivity

• Smoother

• Product performance

• Combination

– Fewer parts

• Less leaks

• Reduced machining

• Fewer fasteners

• Reduced assembly

• Fewer seals

• Tooling costs

EXHAUST MANIFOLDMERCURY INBOARD

120 PER DAYCITATION FOAMS

Page 39: Why lost foam

• GG

• 10 kg.

• 280 x 350 x 220

• Sand casting with cores

• Lighter

• Reduced machining

• Reduced fettling

• Higher productivity

• Smoother

• Product performance

• Combination

– Fewer parts

• Less leaks

• Reduced machining

• Fewer fasteners

• Reduced assembly

• Fewer seals

• Tooling costs

COOLING WATER PUMP

DETROIT DIESEL120 PER DAY

CITATION FOAM

Page 40: Why lost foam

• GG

• 22 kg.

• 300 x 400 x 400

• Sand casting with cores

• Lighter

• Reduced machining

• Reduced fettling

• Higher productivity

• Smoother

• Product performance

• Combination

– Fewer parts

• Less leaks

• Reduced machining

• Fewer fasteners

• Reduced assembly

• Fewer seals

• Tooling costs

WATER VALVE BODYM & H NW 15080 PER DAY

CITATION FOAMS

Page 41: Why lost foam

• GG

• 53 kg.

• 550 x 225 x 100.

• Sand casting with cores

• Lighter

• Reduced machining

• Reduced fettling

• Higher productivity

• Smoother

• Product performance

• Combination

– Fewer parts

• Less leaks

• Reduced machining

• Fewer fasteners

• Reduced assembly

• Fewer seals

• Tooling costs

CYLINDER HEAD - DIESEL

JIN HONG400 PER DAY

IN-HOUSE FOUNDRY

Page 42: Why lost foam

ELECTRICAL MOTOR END SHIELD

80 PER DAYCITATION FOAM

• GG

• 26 kg.

• 711 x 120

• Sand casting with cores

• Lighter

• Reduced machining

• Reduced fettling

• Higher productivity

• Smoother

• Product performance

• Combination

– Fewer parts

• Less leaks

• Reduced machining

• Fewer fasteners

• Reduced assembly

• Fewer seals

• Tooling costs

Page 43: Why lost foam

STEEL CASTINGS

• High accuracy• Good surface quality• Also 3 + mm wall

thickness possible• Reduced machining• Increased machine tool

life• Reduced cleaning room

costs• Complicated castings

possible

ADVANTAGES LIMITATIONS

• Alloys with C < 0.15 %

Page 44: Why lost foam

• GS - Heat resistant

• 1.2 kg.

• 180 x 200 x 30.

• Furan Sand

• Lighter

• Reduced machining

• Reduced fettling

• Higher productivity

• Smoother

• Product performance

• Combination

– Fewer parts

• Less leaks

• Reduced machining

• Fewer fasteners

• Reduced assembly

• Fewer seals

• Tooling costs

ANCHOR CLUSTER

EXPERIMENT

Page 45: Why lost foam

“DRILL HOOK”

PAALS2,000 PER YEAR

GUSSTAHL LIENEN

• GS 25CrMo4

• 1.6 kg.

• 150 x 100

• No comparison possible

• Lighter

• Reduced machining

• Reduced fettling

• Higher productivity

• Smoother

• Product performance

• Combination

– Fewer parts

• Less leaks

• Reduced machining

• Fewer fasteners

• Reduced assembly

• Fewer seals

• Tooling costs

Page 46: Why lost foam

WATER COOLED GRATING BODY

NOELL5,000 PER YEAR

GUSSTAHL LIENEN

• GX 40CrNiSi27-4

• 32 kg

• 650 x 260 x 100.

• Furan Sand

• Lighter

• Reduced machining

• Reduced fettling

• Higher productivity

• Smoother

• Product performance

• Combination

– Fewer parts

• Less leaks

• Reduced machining

• Fewer fasteners

• Reduced assembly

• Fewer seals

• Tooling costs

Page 47: Why lost foam

CERMAK ENGINEERING PFAHLER STR.21,

65 193 WIESBADEN, TEL.+49 611-1509 9495 E-Mail : [email protected]

PLEASE ENQUIRE ABOUT OUR PRESENTATION PART 2

“HOW IS LOST FOAM CONTROLLABLE?”