12
Work Package 4: Multi-sensor model-based quality control of mountain forest production

Wp 4 sandak general overview

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Wp 4 sandak general overview

Work Package 4: Multi-sensor model-based quality

control of mountain forest production

Page 2: Wp 4 sandak general overview

Work Package 4: Multi-sensor model-based

quality control of mountain forest production

Some thoughts after the first day of kick-off meeting:

1. Complements for all partners for fascinating presentations, unique know-how and enthusiasm.

2. The forest in mountains is peculiar, and very different than such of flat lands!!!

3. Trees in mountains are (mostly) BIG…4. Big/old tree may be or superior quality, or “fuel wood”5. Trees from mountains might be of really high value6. We do support with our heart “PROPER LOG FOR PROPER USE”7. The quality of wood/log/tree is an issue!!!!!8. But, the quality of wood is not only external dimentions, taper

and diameter…

Page 3: Wp 4 sandak general overview

Work Package 4: Multi-sensor model-based

quality control of mountain forest production

Wood might not be perfect…

Page 4: Wp 4 sandak general overview

Work Package 4: Multi-sensor model-based

quality control of mountain forest production

Wood from mountains might be priceless…

Page 5: Wp 4 sandak general overview

Work Package 4: Multi-sensor model-based

quality control of mountain forest production

The goals of this WP are:• to develop an automated and real-time grading system for the forest production, in order to improve log/biomass segregation and to help develop a more efficient supply chain of mountain forest products• to design software solutions for continuous update the pre-harvest inventory procedures in the mountain areas • to provide data to refine stand growth and yield models for long-term silvicultural management

Page 6: Wp 4 sandak general overview

Work Package 4: Multi-sensor model-based

quality control of mountain forest production

Fine-grained timeline:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36

MHG 1ITENE 1.1KESLA 1.2GRAPHITECH 1.3CNR 1.4MHG 1.52FLY 2.1COAST 2.2TRE 2.3GRAPHITECH 2.4ITENE 2.5GRE 3CNR 3.1GRE 3.2GRE 3.3KESLA 3.4ITENE 3.5MHG 3.6

4

TRE 4.1

CNR 4.2

BOKU 4.3

CNR 4.4

CNR 4.5

CNR 4.6

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36

MHG 1ITENE 1.1KESLA 1.2GRAPHITECH 1.3CNR 1.4MHG 1.52FLY 2.1COAST 2.2TRE 2.3GRAPHITECH 2.4ITENE 2.5GRE 3CNR 3.1GRE 3.2GRE 3.3KESLA 3.4ITENE 3.5MHG 3.6

4

TRE 4.1

CNR 4.2

BOKU 4.3

CNR 4.4

CNR 4.5

CNR 4.6

Page 7: Wp 4 sandak general overview

Work Package 4: Multi-sensor model-based

quality control of mountain forest production

Interim delivery stages (with dates):

D.4.01 R: Existing grading rules for log/biomass (December 2014)D.4.02 R: On-field survey data for tree characterization (March 2015)D.4.03 R: Establishing NIR measurement protocol (April 2015)D.4.04 R: Establishing hyperspectral imaging measurement protocol (May 2015)D.4.05 R: Establishing acoustic-based measurement protocol (June 2015)D.4.06 R: Establishing cutting power measurement protocol (July 2015)D.4.07 P: Estimation of log/biomass quality by external tree shape analysis (July 2015)D.4.08 P: Estimation of log/biomass quality by NIR (August 2015)D.4.09 P: Estimation of log quality by hyperspectral imaging (September 2015)D.4.10 P: Estimation of log quality by acoustic methods (October 2015)D.4.11 P: Estimation of log quality by cutting power analysis (November 2015)D.4.12 P: Implementation and calibration of prediction models for log/biomass quality classes and report on the validation procedure (July 2016)

Page 8: Wp 4 sandak general overview

Work Package 4: Multi-sensor model-based

quality control of mountain forest production

Partners’ role and contributions:

Will be explained in presentations of tasks…

Page 9: Wp 4 sandak general overview

Work Package 4: Multi-sensor model-based

quality control of mountain forest production

Dependences between activities:

•T1.2 (and your comments) vital for proper initiation of work…

•WP4 is strictly related to WP3

•WP4 provides data to WP5

Page 10: Wp 4 sandak general overview

Work Package 4: Multi-sensor model-based

quality control of mountain forest production

Task 2.34.1.on-field forest survey

GPSPC/PAD3D scanner

3D vision

Tasks 3.14.2-4.3Mark treeConfirm route of cable crane

GPSPC/PADRFID TAGRFID reader

Tasks 3.24.4

Tree felling

Database

NIR QIH QI

RFID reader

RFID TAG(if cross cut)

Portable NIRHyperspectral

AccellerometersOscilloscope

SW QI

Tasks 3.3

Cable crane

Techno carriageGPRSRFID readerWIFISkyline launcherLoad sensorIntelligent chookersGPSPC/PADData loggerBlack box access

Control systemM/M interface

Tasks 3.44.2-4.3-4.4-4.5-4.6Processorde-brunch, cut to length, measures, mark

Load cell for cutting forceCutting feed sensorFeed force sensorDiameter digital caliperLengthRFID readerRFID TAGPC control comp.GPRS/WIFI

HyperspectralNIR scannerKinect ® (or similar 3D vision)Microphone/accellerometer

Data loggerBlack box accessCode Printer

Control systemM/M interfaceID backupDatabase

NIR QI + H QI + SW QI + CF QI

Tasks 3.5

Truck

RFID tags are only used for identifying trees/logs along the supply chain, not to store information.Material parameters from sensors are stored in the database

GPSGPRSRFID antennaBUSCANLoad cell

Logistic Software

ID backup

ID backup

Weight, time

Quality class

Page 11: Wp 4 sandak general overview

Work Package 4: Multi-sensor model-based

quality control of mountain forest production

Risks and mitigating actions:

To keep focus on practical applications and not pure (fascinating for us) research; 2-monts progress reporting, contributions/comments of SLOPE partners

Properly define real user expectations; contribution of the development of WP1, discussions with stake holders, foresters, users of forest resources

Technologies provided will not be appreciated by “conservative” forest users; demonstrate financial (and other) SLOPE advantages

Difficulties with integration of some sensors with forest machinery; careful planning, collaboration with SLOPE engineers

Page 12: Wp 4 sandak general overview

Thank you very much