Common Core State Standards Systems Map

Version 2013.6.13

Joe Hsueh and Peter Senge

joehsueh@mit.edu psenge@mit.edu

Two Systems Maps

• Enclosed are two systems maps capturing the complexity and interdependency of the Common Core State Standards implementation:

1. Stock-and-Flow diagram

2. Core Reinforcing Loops

1. Stock-and-Flow Diagram

INCREASING THE STOCK OF EFFECTIVE STUDNETS

Stock-and-Flow Diagram Notation • The rectangle “Effective 4-12 Students” denotes a stock variable that behaves like a bathtub with an inflow and an

outflow. • The hollow arrow with the valve sign “Engaged Early Childhood Graduates” denotes the rate of Early Childhood Kids

grow into Effective 4-12 Students over time. • New borns grow from Early Childhood Kids to Effective 4-12 Students to Higher Education Students to Entry Job

Employees to Effective Responsible Happy Citizens – the vision of the education effort.

Color Code: Key Systems Capabilities Interventions

STUDENTS MOVING FROM DISENGAGED TO ENGAGED AND EFFECTIVE • Early Childhood Kids can become disengaged and grow into Disengaged & Dropout 4-12 Students, which can be

reengaged into Effective 4-12 Students. • Effective 4-12 Students can enter into higher education or they can go into entry jobs directly, some of which will return

to school to get a college education.

WAYS THAT EFFECTIVE CCSS IMPLEMENTATION CAN INCREASE STOCK OF EFFECTIVE STUDENTS

• Solid Arrow represents the causal direction from a cause to an effect, e.g. more Effective Parents lead to higher Early Childhood Development and Out-of-School Supports.

• Effective Common Core Implementation is driven by Out-of-School Supports, Student Supports, Innovations in Pedagogy and Instructional Design, College and Career Readiness CCR Assessments, Common Core State Standards CCSS and Student Peer Network among others.

• R sign indicates a positive reinforcing feedback loop.

• R1 Student Peer Network (PN) Loop: more Effective 4-12 Students lead to more effective Student Peer Network, which enhances Effective Common Core Implementation through peer learning and creates more Effective 4-12 Students.

• Reinforcing feedback loops are key to scale up systemic change as various interventions catalyze circular self-reinforcing processes.

• The goal is to invest in various high-leverage points to the extent where the system tips into self-sustaining change processes.

Color Code: Key Systems Capabilities Interventions Peer Learning Network Potential High Leverage Points

GROWING EFFECTIVE TEACHERS R2 Teacher Peer Network Loop: more Effective Teachers lead to a stronger Teacher Peer Network, which increases Teacher Capacity Building and creates more Effective Teachers. Creating a teacher peer network where teachers learn from their effective peers creates a powerful reinforcing loop to generate more effective teachers over time.

CONNECTING STUDENT OUTCOMES, TEACHER EVALUATION WITH TEACHER CAPACITY BUILDING R3 Teacher Evaluation Loop: more Effective Teachers lead to higher Innovations in Pedagogy and Instructional Design, which increases Effective Common Core Implementation that creates more Effective 4-12 Students and better Student Outcomes. How to close the feedback loop so better Student Outcomes feed back to the creation of more Effective Teachers? 1) Strengthen the Teacher Evaluation—Teacher Capacity Building link by creating incentives and effective support for Teacher Capacity Building based on Teacher Evaluation&Feedback, and 2) strengthen the Student Outcomes—Teacher Evaluation link by aligning Teacher Evaluation& Feedback based on understanding influences of pedagogical innovation on Student Outcomes. This closes the reinforcing feedback loop from Effective Teachers to Student Outcomes to further development of Effective Teachers. Teachers are evaluate, coached and rewarded based on determinants of higher Student Outcomes, which further build their capacity to become Effective Teachers. What are some specific investments to strengthen these two links?

R4 Higher Ed Alignment Loop: more Effective 4-12 Students lead to more Higher Education Students as less students dropout. This in turn generates more Higher Ed Revenue and creates a business case in addition to moral case for further K-12 and Higher Ed Alignment with CCSS.

GROWING EFFECTIVE BUILDING LEADERS TO SHAPE CLIMATE FOR MORE EFFECTIVE TEACHERS & IMPROVING STUDENT OUTCOMES R5 Building Leader Peer Network Loop: similar to R2 Teacher PN Loop, more Effective Building Leaders lead to a stronger Building Leader Peer Network, which increases Building Leader Capacity Building and creates more Effective Building Leaders. R6 Building Leader (BL) Evaluation Loop: similar to R3 Teacher Evaluation Loop, setting the right Building Leader Evaluation & Feedback based on Teacher Evaluation and on Student Outcomes can guiding coaching and incentivize further Building Leader Development and creates more Effective Building Leaders over time.

GROWING EFFECTIVE DISTRICT LEADERS TO SHAPE CLIMATE FOR GROWING BUILDING LEADERS & EFFECTIVE TEACHERS R7 District Leader Peer Network Loop and R8 District Leader Evaluation Loop are two similar loops operating at the district leader level.

R9 State Leader Evaluation Loop: the more State Leader Evaluation is based on Student Outcomes, the more Effective State Policy & Funding is aligned for Effective CCSS Implementation.

R10 Provider Learning Loop: Effective Education Resource/Service Providers develop Quality Instructional Materials that enhance Effective Common Core Implementation, which leads to more Provider Capacity Building through learning and experience.

R11 Communication Loop: better Student Outcomes and Career Competitiveness lead to higher Public Perceived Benefits of CCSS, which enable better Communication and Stakeholder Engagement for Effective CC Implementation.

R12 Business & Community Leader Advocacy Loop: building Effective Business and Community Leaders is critical for advocating CCSS with wider stakeholders.

R13 Foundation & NGO Leaders Loop: building Effective Foundation & NGO Leaders is critical for coordinating high leverage investments.

Common Core State Standards Systems Map 2013.5.9

How to Use the Map? • When deciding on where to invest for effective CCSS implementation, one

could use the map to reflect on the following questions:

1. As you look at the overall map, what loops are high priority to ensure

implementation of CCSS is successful? Why? 2. Within those priority loops, what has been done about them currently?

What are the weak or missing links in the loops? 3. Of those weak or missing links, what high-leverage points and specific

investments should be focused in order to strengthen the loops? 4. How should those investments be sequenced under what timeline and

2. Core Reinforcing Loops • The following map distills the core reinforcing loops from the more

complex Stock-and-Flow diagram for ease of reading and focus.

• Each loop is renumbered that does not correspond to the ones shown in the Stock-and-Flow diagram.

TeacherCapacityBuilding

Teacher Peer LC(Training, Coaching,

Peer Support)

TeacherEvaluation

StudentOutcomes

InstructionalMaterials

Out-of-SchoolSupport

StudentSupports

Innovations inPedagogy and

Instructional Design

TeacherEducation

TeacherPLC

EffectiveTeachers

CCSSImplementation

Success

Color Code: Key Systems Capabilities Interventions Peer Learning Community

Peer Support)

TeacherEvaluation

StudentOutcomes

Building LeaderDevelopment

BuildingLeaderPeer LC

Building LeaderEvaluation

StudentSupports

TeacherEducation

TeacherPLC

BuildingLeader PLC

EffectiveTeachers

CCSSImplementation

Success

EffectiveBuildingLeaders

Peer Support)

TeacherEvaluation

StudentOutcomes

District LeaderDevelopment

DistrictLeaderPeer LC

District LeaderAccountabil ity

StudentSupports

TeacherEducation

TeacherPLC

BuildingLeader PLC

DL PLC

DL Accountability

EffectiveTeachers

CCSSImplementation

Success

EffectiveDistrict Leaders

Peer Support)

TeacherEvaluation

StudentOutcomes

State EducationAgency Leaders

StudentSupports

State LeaderEvaluation

TeacherEducation

TeacherPLC

BuildingLeader PLC

DL PLC

DL Accountability

SL Evaluation

EffectiveTeachers

CCSSImplementation

Success

Peer Support)

TeacherEvaluation

StudentOutcomes

StudentSupports

K-12 and HigherEd Alignment

with CCSS

Demand forCC Materials

TeacherEducation

TeacherPLC

BuildingLeader PLC

DL PLC

DL Accountability

SL Evaluation

ProviderIncentives

Higher EdRevenue

Higher Ed Alignment

Student PLC

Higher EducationSuccess

EffectiveTeachers

CCSSImplementation

Success

Peer Support)

TeacherEvaluation

StudentOutcomes

Communications& StakeholderEngagement

StudentSupports

with CCSS

GlobalCompetitiveness for

Robust Economy

TeacherEducation

TeacherPLC

BuildingLeader PLC

DL PLC

DL Accountability

Public PerceivedBenefits of CCSS

SL Evaluation

Communication

ProviderIncentives

Higher EdRevenue

Higher Ed Alignment

Student PLC

CareerSuccess

EffectiveTeachers

CCSSImplementation

Success

EffectiveParents

Global Competitiveness

ParentsEngagement

Peer Support)

TeacherEvaluation

StudentOutcomes

Effective Business &Community Leaders

Communications& StakeholderEngagement

StudentSupports

with CCSS

GlobalCompetitiveness for

Robust Economy

TeacherEducation

TeacherPLC

BuildingLeader PLC

DL PLC

DL Accountability

Public PerceivedBenefits of CCSS

SL Evaluation

Communication

CommunityEngagement

ProviderIncentives

Business & CommunityLeader Advocacy

Higher EdRevenue

Higher Ed Alignment

Student PLC

CareerSuccess

EffectiveTeachers

CCSSImplementation

Success

EffectiveParents

Global Competitiveness

ParentsEngagement

Color Code: Key Systems Capabilities Interventions Peer Learning Community

Common Core State Standards Core Reinforcing Loops Version 2012.12.11

Acknowledgement

• Sandra Alberti, Jim Applegate, Sue Cain, Barbara Chow, Tammi Chun, Michael Cohen, Eric Gordon, Donna Harris-Aikens, Scott Hartl, Kelly James, Glenn Kleiman, Dan Leeds, Lillian Lowery, Richard McKeon, Sue Pimentel, Bill Porter, Iris Taylor, Lisa Towne, Marla Ucelli

Common Core State Standards Systems Map · Common Core State Standards Systems Map Version...

Documents

© 2007 Chintan Vaishnav, Engineering Systems Division, Massachusetts Institute of Technology The end of core: Chintan Vaishnav, ESD, MIT chintanv@mit.edu

Annals of Nuclear Energyjlmiao/download/MC_mbp.pdfE-mail addresses: jlmiao@mit.edu (J. Miao), bforget@mit.edu (B. Forget), kord@mit.edu (K. Smith). Annals of Nuclear Energy 112 (2018)

For info, contact: kkw”at”mit.edu K. Krasnow Waterman 1 Accountable Systems: Fusion Center Prototype Spring 2010

yuewangx@mit.edu jsolomon@mit.edu Abstract …Justin M. Solomon Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 jsolomon@mit.edu Abstract Point cloud

pchesler@mit.edu lekaveck@mit.edu krishna@mit.edu … · JHEP10(2013)013 We want a toy model in which we can reliably calculate how the energy loss rate of a heavy quark moving through

SPHERES MIT Space Systems Laboratory Cambridge, MA spheres-ops@mit.edu 2006-Aug-08 Synchronized Position Hold, Engage, Reorient, Experimental Satellites

FUNdaMENTALS of Design - mit.edu

16.412J/6.835 Intelligent Embedded Systems Prof. Brian Williams Rm 37-381 Rm NE43-838 Williams@mit.edu Prof. Brian Williams Rm 37-381 Rm NE43-838 Williams@mit.edu

Global Analysis of Piecewise Linear Systems Using Impact ...jmg/publi/pls.pdf · jmg@mit.edu, ameg@mit.edu, dahleh@mit.edu January 29, 2004 Abstract In this paper we develop an entirely

xamyzhao@mit.edu balakg@mit.edu fredo@mit.edu …Data augmentation using learned transformations for one-shot medical image segmentation Amy Zhao MIT xamyzhao@mit.edu Guha Balakrishnan

12.215 Modern Navigation Thomas Herring (tah@mit.edu),tah@mit.edu tah/12.215

6.003: Signals and Systemsweb.mit.edu/6.003/for-posting/lectures/lec01.pdfText Signals and Systems by Oppenheim and Willsky Web Site mit.edu/6.003. 6.003: Signals and Systems Homework:

Precision Engineering Research Group, MIT Kinematic Couplings and Elastic Averaging Prof. Alexander Slocum (slocum@mit.edu) John Hart (ajhart@mit.edu)

MIT.edu: Human Relations in the Workplace

BUILDING SYSTEMS - mit.edu€¦ · building systems Prefabricated Concrete Wall Large wall segments up to 25ft (7m) can be pre-assembled in the factory. These panels may include window

Abstract - mit.edu€¦ · Abstract ∗ † ! "#$%&%' () * + , 1 Introduction ! " !!! # $ ! ! %

Clean-Label Backdoor Attacks - MIT CSAILClean-Label Backdoor Attacks Alexander Turner MIT turneram@mit.edu Dimitris Tsipras MIT tsipras@mit.edu Aleksander Mądry MIT madry@mit.edu

MISTI - alum-r1.mit.edu

The Value of Aggregators in Electricity Systems Scott ... · The Value of Aggregators in Electricity Systems ... ipa@mit.edu. Professor at Comillas ... at some point in the future,

THE ECONOMICJOURNAL - mit.edu