The Effects of Thermal Bridging on Building …...The Effects of Thermal Bridging on Building...

The Effects of Thermal The Effects of Thermal Bridging on Building

Envelope Performance

A Whole Building Energy Perspective

Dave André P EngDave André, P.Eng.January 2014

Thermal Bridging Impact1 g g p

Thermal Bridging Overview2

Thermal Bridging Prioritization3

Building Envelope Thermal Performance4

Best Practice Design Approach5

2

1 Thermal Bridging Impact1

3

4

Source: Architecture 2030

5

Source: http://www.energycodes.gov/adoption/states

6

Source: http://www.energycodes.gov/adoption/states

7

Source: http://www.energycodes.gov/adoption/states

8

PerspectivePerspective

Compliance – Energy Codes

Performance -Heat Loss, Condensation and Durability

9

Thermal Bridging Overview2

10

Thermal BridgingWhat is a Thermal Bridge?

• Highly conductive material that by-passes insulation layer• Areas of high heat transfer• Can greatly affect the thermal performance of assembliesg y p

11

• ASHRAE 90.1

• Uvalues (max.)

• Continuous Insulation

• Wall framing heat loss

• 2013 Handbook Fundamental

i i i• Multidimensional Construction

12

ASHRAE Standard 90.1ASHRAE Standard 90.1

13

ASHRAE Standard 90.1ASHRAE 90.1 & thermal bridging

TABLE A3 3 A bl U F f S l F W llTABLE A3.3 Assembly U-Factors for Steel-Frame Walls

Overall U-Factor for Assembly of Base Wall Plus Continuous Insulation (Uninterrupted by Framing)Continuous Insulation (Uninterrupted by Framing)

Rated R-Value of Continuous Insulation

= R-8

= R 8 + R 8

14

= R-8 + R-8

How is Thermal Bridging Typically Evaluated?

Hand Calculations

Computer ModelingLab Measurement

15

The Real World is Complicated!

17

ASHRAE Research ProjectDetails Catalogue

• 40 building assemblies and details common to North American construction

• Focus on opaque assemblies, but also includes some glazing g gtransitions

• Details not already addressed in ASHRAE publicationsp

• Highest priority on details with thermal bridges in 3D

18

• Exterior Insulated Steel Stud

• Concrete Mass Wall

• Curtain Walls

• Precast Panels

• Brick Veneers

19

Overall Heat Loss

oQQ slabQ

Additional heat loss due to the slab

20

Overall Heat Loss

/ LQslab /=Ψ Ψ×= LQslabOR

The linear transmittance represents the additional heat flow because of the heat flow because of the slab, but with area set to zero

21

Overall Heat LossTypes of Transmittances

Clear Field Linear Point

oQ χΨoUor

22

Overall Heat Loss

Total Heat loss Heat loss due to anomalies

heat loss due to clear field +=

( ) ( )nLAUQ Totalo ⋅Σ+⋅ΨΣ+⋅= χ)(

oQ

23

Overall Heat Loss

( ) ( ) UnLU +⋅Σ+⋅ΨΣ

=χ

oTotal

UA

U +

h bl f i h l fi ld f The assembly U-factor is the clear field U-factor, plus all the linear and point transmittances

24

Living Building ChallengeLiving Building Challenge

25

26

2Thermal Bridging Prioritization3

27

High Rise Residential• Inverted roof assemblies

• Window wall glazing (vision

High Rise Residential

Window wall glazing (vision and metal panel areas)

• Punched windows

• Select portions of opaque wall (brick veneer, EIFS, etc.)

• Slab edges (cantilevered Slab edges (cantilevered balcony slabs and window wall bypasses)

28

• Vision AreaPriority 1

• Slab Edges (cantilevered balcony slab, shelf angles, etc.)

• Window TransitionPriority 2

Window Transition

• Opaque Wall Framing (sub Priority • Opaque Wall Framing (sub girts)

Priority 3

29

30

31

32

33

SI (W/m∙K)

IP (BTU/hr∙ftoF)(W/m K) (BTU/hr ft F)

Ψ 0.59 0.3434

SI (W/m∙K)

IP (BTU/hr∙ftoF)

Ψ 0.21 0.1235

36

SI (W/m∙K)

IP (BTU/hr∙ftoF)(W/m K) (BTU/hr ft F)

Ψ 0.47 0.2737

SI (W/m∙K)

IP (BTU/hr∙ftoF)

Ψ 0 31 0 18Ψ 0.31 0.18

38

Slab Edges

39

40

41

42

Ψ ≈ 0.263 BTU/ft·hroF

(0.454 W/m·K)

Flashing extends past thermal break to frame

43

Heat Flow through Window Transition

Heat Flow through 4’ x 8’ Window

Q = 24 x 0.263 = 6.3 BTU/ft∙hroF

Q = 32 x 0.35 = 11.2 BTU/ft·hroF

Ψ = 0.028 BTU/ft·hroF

(0.048 W/m·K)

Flashing stops at th l b kthermal break

45

Heat Flow through Window Transition

Heat Flow through 4’ x 8’ Window Window Transition

Q = 24 x 0.028 = 0.67BTU/ft∙hroF

4 x 8 WindowQ = 32 x 0.35 = 11.2 BTU/ft∙hroF

Vertical Z-Girts Horizontal Z-Girts Mixed Z-Girts Intermittent Z-Girts

47

48

49

Continuous Insulation Systems

• IMP• EIFS • Continuous

insulation ’ systems can’t

escape the poor details poor details problem

50

• IMP Panel Example – effectively continuous insulation but…

• Potentially 40% (plus) heat flow attributed to y (p )window transition

• Panel assembly of U-0.048 is only U-0.127 (effective R-21 to R-8) when considering thermally inefficient details

• Improved to U-0.065 (R-15) without much difficulty (no continuous metal flashing)

51

Insulated Metal Panels

Insulated Metal Panels

Direct heat flow path from interior to exterior through fl hi d t dflashing and studs

P t ti ll 40% ( l ) h t fl tt ib t d t i d t iti• Potentially 40% (plus) heat flow attributed to window transition• Improved to U-0.065 (R-15) without much difficulty (no continuous

metal flashing)

54

Office• Inverted roof assemblies

• Curtain wall glazing

Office

Curtain wall glazing

• Specialty glazing

55

•Vision AreaPriority 1

•SpandrelPriority 2

S i lt Gl iP i it 3 •Specialty GlazingPriority 3

56

Area of circle represents Area of circle represents total envelope heat loss

Fenestration heat loss, UA, Btu/hr-FOpaque wall heat loss UA, Btu/hr-F

2,592 2,98

10,984

81%

,19%

8,244

73%

,3

27%

5,504

62%

3,373

38%2,76442%

3,76458%

Ration = 40%Glazing U=0.40

Ratio = 30%Glazing U=0.40

62%

Ration = 20%Glazing U=0.40

Ratio 10%, Glazing U=0.40

Opaque Wall U=0.059Total Heat Loss = 13576 Btu208% increase

Opaque Wall U=0.059Total Heat Loss 11227 Btu72% increase

Opaque Wall U=0.059Total Heat Loss = 887736% increase

Glazing U 0.40Opaque Wall U=0.059 (R=17)Total Heat Loss = 6528 Btu

575757

Glazing Spandrel Areasg p

No Spray Foam58

Glazing Spandrel Areasg p

S F59

Spray Foam

Glazing Spandrel Areasg p

8 28.8 9.1

9

10

7.48.2

6

7

8

n R

Val

ue

3.44.2

4.8 5.0

3

4

5

6

ndre

l Sec

tion

0

1

2

3

Span

00 5 10 15 20 25 30

Back Pan Insulation

Detail 22 (Air in Stud Cavity) Detail 23 (Spray Foam in Stud Cavity)

60

Glazing Spandrel Areas

N S F S FNo Spray Foam Spray Foam61

Glazing Spandrel Areas

• Provide R-15 insulation in the back panthe back pan

• Provide continuous insulation inboard of the back pan in an airtight back pan in an airtight fashion

• Maximize area with floor to ceiling spandrel to further improve performance

62

3Building Envelope Thermal Performance4

63

How to Use Data Sheets - Sample Projectp j

64

How to evaluate relative contribution of details

Wall Parameter Wall Parameter Values

Wall Width 30 ft (9 1m)Wall Width 30 ft (9.1m)Wall Height 100 ft (30.5m)# of floors 10Glazing % 40%

Steel stud with R-20 exterior

gWindow Perimeter

Length 28 ft (8.5m)

# of Windows 25Opaque Wall 1800 sqft (167 2m2)Steel stud with R 20 exterior

insulation and horizontal girts and R-12 in the stud cavity;

U-0.049 Btu/hrft2oF

Opaque Wall 1800 sqft (167.2m2)

65

Shelf angle Parapet

CornerS g Parapet

Window Transition

Slab

66

67

68

69

Calculations Sample Example 1Calculations Sample – Example 1

H t l d heat loss due Total Heat loss

( ) ( )

Heat loss due to anomalies

heat loss due to clear field

+=

( ) ( )nLAUQ Totalo ⋅Σ+⋅ΨΣ+⋅= χ)(

Q = 0 049 Btu/hrft2oF * 30 ft (width) * 100ft (height) * %60 (area) oQ 0.049 Btu/hrft F 30 ft (width) 100ft (height) %60 (area) = 88 Btu/hroF

( )slabL⋅Ψ = 0.445 Btu/hrft2oF * 30 ft (width) * 10 (# floors)( )slabLΨ= 134 Btu/hroF

70

71

72

Clear Wall Only Including Poor Details Including Efficient Details

0.12

0.14

0.16

R‐3.9

R‐4.5

R‐5.0 R‐5.3R‐5.2

sem

bly

to E

nerg

y

Clear Wall Only Including Poor Details Including Efficient Details

0.08

0.10

man

ce o

f Wal

l Ass

of F

loor

Are

a)

0.02

0.04

0.06 R‐10.2

R‐14.3R‐16.7

of T

herm

al P

erfo

rmU

se(G

J/m

2o

0.00

Con

trib

utio

n o

Additional building energy use based on thermal performance of the building wall assembly for varying amounts of nominal exterior insulation for a mid-rise MURB in

73

Edmonton (overall assembly thermal resistance in ft2·ºF·h/Btu also given)

Key Point Whole Building Energy

• Approaches

Key Point – Whole Building Energy

• Efficient details, thin insulation

• Thick insulation, poor details

• At low effective R-values, increases = big energy savings

• High effective R-value = thermally efficient details and some insulation insulation.

74

4Best Practice Approach5

75

Closing Remarks

• Shift from nominal R-value thinking to effective R-value

• Move beyond simply adding “more insulation”. Examine cost effectiveness

f i l ti th b ildi of insulating the building envelope through better details

• Look to building envelope to provide opportunity to achieve energy gains

• Be prepared to modify details and evaluate new products

76

p

Accessing Information

http://www.morrisonhershfield.com/ashrae1365research/Pages/Insights-Publications.aspx

77

Thank You