Upload
apa-florida
View
404
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Cheryl Stuart David Tillis Susan Beaugrand With more than 500 community development districts throughout Florida, CDDs have been a common way to finance and, in some cases, maintain public infrastructure in developing areas. This session will review their historic role in providing such infrastructure, and then examine how CDDs have fared in the face of the economic recession and decline in Florida real estate values. We'll also discuss how Florida's law governing CDDs has worked in these difficult times. The diverse panel will share "lessons learned" from their varied perspectives, and what each believes the future holds for these special district infrastructure providers.
Citation preview
APA-Florida 2011 Conference
Gary Moyer, Cheryl Stuart, David Tillis
What is a Community Development District (CDD)?
Why Florida created CDDsThe role CDDs have played in Florida’s effort to
manage growthThe economic recession and real estate market
downturn: how have CDDs fared?Lessons learned: what does the future hold for
CDDs as a part of Florida’s growth management landscape and as a way to meet infrastructure finance and maintenance needs?
Independent, special purpose, local governments, with a common statutory charter: Chapter 190, Florida Statutes
Governed by a 5 member board, elected by landowners with a transition to resident-voting
Established by Governor and Cabinet or City/County, depending on size, always with landowner consent
Has power to levy assessments and issue bonds to finance infrastructure (roads, stormwater , recreation, water/sewer, etc)
CDDs are a response to growth, not a catalyst for growth
NOT a general purpose governmentHas no planning, land use, or zoning
authorityHas no environmental permitting authorityAs an independent entity, debt of CDD is not
debt of state, city, or countyDecision whether to establish a CDD is not a
land use decision
Need for uniform, focused and fair procedures in state law for establishment and operation of independent special districts.
An independent district can constitute a timely, efficient, effective, responsive and economic way to deliver basic services, thereby providing a solution to the state’s planning, management and financing needs for delivery of capital infrastructure.
“Growth should pay for itself”
Provides long term lower interest rate financing for public infrastructure and facilities
Reduces up front equity requirementsMitigates risk of large scale community
developmentAllows for enhanced amenity levels and
recreation options making community more attractive and livable
Provides a perpetual public maintenance and governance entity with professional staff and stable funding
Higher level of community amenties and recreation opportunities
Government in the Sunshine, fiscal accountability and responsibility, ability to contract for services
Resident elected Supervisors after initial period of landowner elected Supervisors
Professional staff-manager,engineer,attorneyControl their own destiny-decide level of
maintenance and how much to spend
Infrastructure in place sooner than otherwise would be the case
More exactions passed down through entitlements process
CDDs not the cause of growth, but a response to it
Takes burden off local governmentImpact of establishing unit of government
compared to the alternativesLong term maintenance of infrastructure and
compliance with permits
CDDs are NOT identified as the cause of the economic recession! Nor are they the cause of the real estate downturn.
Failure of large landowners to pay assessments has caused some districts to miss debt service payments, tap reserves, or default on bond issues
Levels of service have been adjusted Impact of individual homeowner failure to pay is
minimalReserves, trustee held funds, and other structural
requirements have given time to recover and rebound
If no CDD, likely left only with homeowner’s association with limited financial strength
Long term maintenance of infrastructure Ability to participate in financial workout;
professional staffAbility to collect and enforce assessment leviesGovernmental accountability (open meetings,
public records, etc)More “one off” subdivisions versus master
planned communities with greater variety of housing, land use and recreation opportunities
Will CDDs be a part of the infrastructure landscape in the years ahead?
Has the assessment process “worked”?How will the financial markets/investors react to
CDD bond offerings? What might be different?How will consumers react to buying in
communities with CDDs? How much will that reaction depend on the amenities provided by the CDD compared to other developments?
How might local governments view CDDs going forward?