•  Field trials and flowback data •  Increased oil and gas production •  Reduced pump pressures •  Reduced energy cost

Rebound Aq

Case Study #1 Increased Oil •  On  June  1,  2012,  rebound  was  introduced  into  a  2,200  ft.  well  that  

produced  only  0.5  bpd  for  a  period  of  three  years.  •  Based  on  the  calculations  of  water  in  the  system,  five  gallons  of  

Rebound  Aq  was  poured  into  the  well  inlet  at  a  0.5%  dilution  which  resulted  in  a  final  .04%  dilution.  The  pump  was  set  to  percolate  and  the  product  was  allowed  to  permeate  into  the  surrounding  near  well  bore  formation.  Upon  restarting  the  pump,  the  operator  showed  a  significant  increase  in  oil  flowback,  up  to  5  bpd.  The  operator  also  noticed  sand  from  the  Austin  chalk  formation  represented  in  the  recovered  product.  This  was  a  significant  observation  showing  Rebounds  ability  to  clean  out  the  veins  of  the  formation  and  proppant  sand  from  the  original  fracture.  This  increase  in  production  lasted  for  three  weeks.  Before  the  use  of  Rebound,  the  wells  produced  10.5  barrels  of  oil  in  a  three  week  time  frame.  After  treatment  with  Rebound,  the  next  three  weeks  produced  105  barrels  of  oil  resulting  in  a  900  %  increase  in  production.    

Case Study #1 graphical results

3.25   3.5   3.75  

0  

30  

35  

40  

0  

5  

10  

15  

20  

25  

30  

35  

40  

45  

week1   week2   week3   injection   week4   week5   week6  

Barrels  of  oil  

Barrels  of  oil  

Rebound  Aq    injection  

Case Study #2 Increased Gas and Energy Cost Savings •  On  February  14,  2013  Rebound  Aq  was  introduced  into  a  field  of  6  wells  that  were  

drilled  in  the  1940’s.  The  property  owner  stated  previously  prior  to  treatment,  they  produced  a  steady  3  ½  inches  [which  is  equivalent  to  1  barrel  =  1  inch]  or  3.5  bpd.  After  partial  treatment  of  Rb  into  the  production  water  tank,  they  saw  an  increase  to  a  steady  4  bpd.  After  the  plumbing  was  complete  and  the  pressure  dropped  at  the  injection  well  and  injection  pump,  he  had  one  day  of  6  barrels  of  production,  and  two  days  of  5  ½  barrels,  then  5  barrels.  After  which  it  subsided  to  4  ½  barrels  and  remained  constant.  The  first  of  September  showed  an  increase  to  8bpd  and  has  steadied  throughout  the  month.  That  is  an  increase  of  128%.  Turning  on  the  injection  pump  along  with  the  MR  pump  injecting  3.48  gallons  of  Rb  mixture  a  day,  did  indeed  allow  the  pressures  at  both  the  injection  pump  and  the  injection  well  to  reach  a  sustained  maximum  pressure  allowance  of  200  PSI  for  a  time  period  of  40  minutes  after  building  gradually.  The  injection  well’s  pressure  went  down  to  100  PSI,  and  gradually  decreased  from  there.  This  is  a  two-­‐fold  benefit,  one  being  there  is  less  mechanical  strain  kept  on  the  injection  pump,  resulting  in  both  longer  life  span  of  the  pump  and  porcelain  pistons  but  also  a  decreased  electricity  bill  as  the  pump  works  more  efficiently  to  push  fluid  down  the  line.  The  operator  also  estimates  a  gas  production  increase  of  20-­‐30%,  although  this  was  not  documented.  

 

Case Study #2 graphical results

0  

2  

4  

6  

8  

10  

12  

Bbls/  day  

Bbls/  day  

Rebound    Aq  Treatment