Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Presentation given by Wiebe Wiersema al the HAN University "Next generation" symposium
Citation preview
Mo
del B
ased
Develo
pm
en
t H
ow
to
org
an
ize a
nd
arc
hit
ect
su
rviv
al o
f M
D*
Wie
be
Wie
rse
ma
Le
cto
r A
rch
ite
ctu
ur
Dig
ita
le In
form
ati
e S
ys
tem
en
Info
rma
tio
n S
yste
ms: T
he
Ne
xt G
en
era
tio
nH
og
esch
oo
l Arn
he
m N
ijme
ge
n
Ju
ne
19
th2
00
9
Wh
y M
D*
is d
an
gero
us..
�S
ohow
hard
can
itbe, to
build
a 1
50 p
cs
lego h
elic
opte
r?
�U
sin
g15 p
eople
�H
avin
g45 m
inute
s
�W
hen
one
team
is g
iven
a 4
0%
fin
ished
helic
opte
r(M
DA
)
�W
ill t
hatte
am
win
?
Wh
y M
D*
is d
an
gero
us..
�T
his
gam
e w
as d
one
3x,
150 p
eople
involv
ed
�M
DA
team
fin
ished
last
every
tim
e
�T
he team
s thatw
on a
lways
used
a p
rofe
ssio
nal
�T
he team
s thatw
on a
lways
used
a p
rofe
ssio
nal
pro
ject m
anagem
ent
appro
ach
�B
uteven t
he team
s h
avin
ga p
oor
pro
ject appro
ach
still
did
bett
er
than
the M
DA
team
s…
.
Wh
y M
D*
is d
an
gero
us..
�T
he M
DA
team
s k
eep o
nlo
sin
gth
eir
com
mon
sense
�F
ocused
all
their
energ
yon
the tool
�F
ocused
all
their
energ
yon
bra
ggin
gabout
the g
reat
advanta
ge
they
had
One
team
actu
ally
sta
rtin
gselli
ng
“models
” to
com
peting
�O
ne
team
actu
ally
sta
rtin
gselli
ng
“models
” to
com
peting
team
s, com
ple
tely
forg
ett
ing
their
obje
ctives.
�H
appens a
ll th
e tim
e in t
he fie
ld
�M
y thought
on
this
�In
novation
dis
tracts
�E
ven m
ore
so
when
a t
eam
has low
pro
cess
matu
rity
Wh
y is t
his
im
po
rtan
t?
Bro
n: S
tandis
h G
roup, 2004
Su
bje
ct
for
tod
ay
�W
ha
t so
rt o
f d
ep
en
de
ncie
s a
re in
tro
du
ce
d
wh
en
usin
g a
mo
de
l b
ase
d a
pp
roa
ch
in
a
so
ftw
are
pro
ject?
Wh
at
so
rt o
f arc
hit
ectu
re?
Bro
n: W
ieringa, 2006
So
ftw
are
develo
pm
en
t to
day
Usin
g M
D*
Is it
that
sim
ple
?S
olu
tio
n v
iew
Oth
er
/ N
FR
equirem
ents
Stu
ff that
does n
ot
fit
in a
model
Solu
tion
Arc
hitectu
re
Test
Outp
ut
Configura
tion
Managem
ent
Is it
that
sim
ple
?P
roje
ct
man
ag
em
en
t vie
w
Pro
ject
Pla
nnin
gTeam
sW
ork
ing
para
llel
Measure
ment
& A
naly
sis
Qualit
yA
ssura
nce
Monitoring
&C
ontr
ol
Subcontr
acto
rs
Mis
ery
mo
ves, b
ut
do
es n
ot
go
aw
ay…
MD
* h
as g
rea
t b
en
efits
, b
ut:
�M
D*
actu
ally
in
tro
du
ce
s a
lo
t o
f ri
gid
ity
�M
od
els
are
on
ly f
lexib
le w
he
re f
lexib
ility
ha
s
be
en
de
sig
ne
d
�T
he
ke
y p
laye
rs in
th
e p
roje
ct
ne
ed
to
un
de
rsta
nd
th
e lim
ita
tio
ns t
ha
t th
e (
me
ta)
mo
de
ls in
tro
du
ce
s
Real life
exam
ple
s
�M
od
elli
ng
en
vir
on
me
nt
did
no
t su
pp
ort
ve
rsio
n
co
ntr
ol
�M
od
elli
ng
to
ol/a
pp
roa
ch
“a
lmo
st”
fin
ish
ed
at
pro
ject sta
rtp
roje
ct sta
rt
�R
eq
uir
em
en
ts t
ea
m d
id n
ot
un
de
rsta
nd
wh
at
wa
s a
llow
ed
an
d w
ha
t n
ot.
�P
roje
ct m
an
ag
er
ha
d n
ot
un
de
rsto
od
im
pa
ct
of
the
to
ol
�M
D*
wa
s s
old
to
th
e c
usto
me
r, b
ut
tea
m h
ad
no
exp
eri
en
ce
So
ho
w t
o s
urv
ive M
D*
for
su
re?
Tech
nic
al
�M
ake a
solu
tion a
rchitectu
re o
f th
e s
olu
tion
and t
he
pro
ject environm
ent
that in
tegra
tes a
ll th
e d
iscip
lines
involv
ed a
cro
ss the p
roje
ct lif
ecycle
�P
roje
ct m
an
ag
em
en
t
�R
eq
uir
em
en
tsR
eq
uir
em
en
ts
�D
esig
n
�B
uild
�C
on
fig
ura
tio
n m
an
ag
em
en
t
�T
est
�D
ep
loym
en
t
�M
ain
ten
an
ce
�Q
ua
lity
Bro
n: IE
EE
Sw
ebok 2
004
So
ho
w t
o s
urv
ive M
D*
for
su
re?
Org
an
isati
on
al
�A
lign a
ll th
e s
takehold
ers
so t
hey u
nders
tand t
he
impact of th
e M
D*
you a
re u
sin
g
�M
ake s
ure
the w
hole
team
unders
tands t
he im
pact
of
MD
*M
D*
�U
se a
pro
ven a
ppro
ach,
don’t b
uild
it
yours
elv
es…
�P
repare
3, be f
lexib
le a
nd s
upport
ive
So
ho
w t
o s
urv
ive M
D*
for
su
re?
In g
en
era
l
�B
efo
reyo
usca
leu
p th
e te
am
, m
ake
su
reth
e w
ho
lea
pp
roa
ch
wo
rks
(en
d
to e
nd
!)
�D
on
’tb
oth
er
usin
git
wh
en
yo
ua
re n
ota
bo
ve
CM
Mi le
ve
l 2
, p
refe
rab
lyle
ve
l 3
�M
ove
fro
mh
elic
op
ter
to g
ira
ffe
vie
w
Qu
esti
on
s?
Th
an
k y
ou
Wie
be
Wie
rse
ma
Wie
be
Wie
rse
ma
wie
be
.wie
rse
ma
@h
u.n
l
ww
w.p
roce
ssin
no
va
tio
n.n
l
