Upload
mvrpc
View
454
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Homework Assignment
Technical Advisory CommitteeJuly 17, 2008
Martin Kim, Director of Regional Planning
Public and Stakeholder Outreach
Publicizing Going Places Initiative (since January 2007) Number of presentations given - 59 Number of organizations presentation was given to - 53 Number of audiences – 1,100 Number of GP business cards distributed – 1,750 Number of GP information brochures distributed – 1,700
What else could and/or should we do to make this initiative successful?
We ask you to discuss this question with at least three of your colleagues and/or staff at your organization and submit our
homework assignment via email to [email protected]
What would the Going Places Initiative need to have or do in order for your organization to consider formally
endorsing it and incorporating it into your planning activities?
Overview
Overall GP website design and launch Updates on main page Updates chronologically Sections for different topics – colors/ icons
New Features Sign up for email updates MV Favorite Places
Going Places Website
Launched August 2007 - www.mvrpc.org/rlu
Centralized site for updates and information on the regional planning process. Study reports and
presentations Information brochure Meeting announcement
and materials and much more
Main page has updates for entire project Project updates are added chronologically GP website includes background information about the project
General Information
Topic Area
Phase 1 – Existing Condition Assessment
Data collection and analysis delivered for multiple topic areas
E-mail Updates
Going Places updates delivered to your inbox
Web-based registration GP Committees, MVRPC
Board and TAC automatically registered
Favorite Places
Focus on what we want the Region to be in the Future Find the examples that inspire us in the present Collect varied places from interested participants as well as
staff Remind us all of why this Region is special and how we hope to
improve
Miami Valley Favorite Places
Map based photo gallery Visitors can submit photos
and location via Photo Uploader
Staff reviews for appropriateness, and loads to web with geo-location
Miami Valley Industrial Development Assessment
Katryn Bowman,
Research Associate
Presented to TAC and MVRPC
Purpose
To examine the Region’s industrial development status as part of “Going Places: An Integrated Land Use Vision for the Miami Valley Region”
To provide a comprehensive overview of the current industrial development conditions in the Region
To estimate future industrial development requirements for the Region
Data Sources
Greene, Miami, Montgomery, and Warren counties The cities of Franklin, Carlisle, and Springboro in
Warren County United States Postal Service Gem Real Estate Group Woods and Poole, Inc. Ohio Department of Jobs and Families MVPRC
Introduction Industrial Land Use – Regional Overview Industrial Land Use – Land-Based Analysis Industrial Land Use – Building-Based Analysis Market Assessment Industrial Employment Conclusion
Report Structure
Definition
Industrial land use is defined as “the land and improvements to land used for manufacturing, processing, or refining foods and materials, and warehouses used in connection therewith.” (State of Ohio Classification of Real Property)
Definition
Industrial Land Categories Food and Drink Processing Plants and Storage Foundries and Heavy Manufacturing Plants Light to Medium Manufacturing and Assembly Plants Industrial Warehouses and Truck Terminals Small Shops (Machine, Tool & Die, Etc.) Other Industrial Structures Vacant – Unbuilt Unclassified Industrial Land
MIAMI
MONTGOME RY
GREENE
WARREN
§̈¦I 75
§̈¦I 675
§̈¦I 70
§̈¦I 71
§̈¦I 75
Dayton
Troy
Xenia
1950 Urbanized Area
2000 Urbanized Area*
Source: Census 1950, 2000* The concept of "Urban Clusters" began in theU.S. Census from the year 2000. The UrbanizedArea shown here for the year 2000 also includesUrban Clusters.
0 2 4 6 8Miles
Industrial Land Use – Regional Overview
Industrial Land Use – Regional Overview
1975 2000 % Change 1975 2000 % ChangeRegion 8,551 10,428 22.0% 102,234 168,107 64.4%
Greene 2,344 2,094 -10.7% 26,188 53,500 104.3%Miami 1,411 2,565 81.8% 9,893 22,694 129.4%Montgomery 4,796 5,769 20.3% 66,152 91,913 38.9%
Industrial Land Non-Industrial Developed Land
Industrial Land Use – Regional Overview
MIAMI
MONTGOME RY
GREENE
WARREN
Dayton
Troy
Xenia
§̈¦I 75
§̈¦I 675
§̈¦I 70
§̈¦I 71
§̈¦I 75
0 4 82Miles
Industrial Land Non-Industrial Land Total AcresGreene 2,469 (0.9%) 263,720 (99.1%) 266,189Miami 3,069 (1.2%) 259,212 (98.8%) 262,281Montgomery 7,474 (2.5%) 289,747 (97.5%) 297,221Warren* 1,083 (7.5%) 13,271 (92.5%) 14,355
Non-Industrial Acres825,950 (98.3%)
Industrial Acres14,095 (1.7%)
Industrial Land Use – Regional Overview
MIAMI
MONTGOME RY
GREENE
WARREN
§̈¦I 75
§̈¦I 675
§̈¦I 70
§̈¦I 71
§̈¦I 75
Dayton
Troy
Xenia
0 4 82Miles
Business Vacancy Rateby Census Tract - 2008
Tracts with Regionally and LocallySignificant
Total GFA Total Vacant GFA Percent VacantGem Survey 18,983,087 3,655,962 19.3%MVRPC Estimate 137,444,866 26,470,574 19.3%Source: Gem Real Estate Group
Source: United States Postal Service
Industrial Land Use – Land Based AnalysisOther Industrial
Structures1,655 (12%)
Small Shops (Machine,Tool & Die, Etc.)
881 (6%)
Industrial Warehousesand Truck Terminals
1,882 (13%)
Light to MediumManufacturing andAssembly Plants
3,429 (25%)
Foundries and HeavyManufacturing Plants
790 (6%)
Food and DrinkProcessing Plants and
Storage126 (1%)
Vacant - Unbuilt4,213 (30%)
Unclassified973 (7%
Industrial Land Use – Land-Based Analysis
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Greene Miami Montgomery Warren*
Unclassified IndustrialLand
Food and DrinkProcessing Plants andStorageFoundries and HeavyManufacturing Plants
Small Shops
Other IndustrialStructures
Industrial Warehousesand Truck Terminals
Vacant - Unbuilt
Light to MediumManufacturing andAssembly Plant
Industrial Land Use – Land-Based Analysis
MIAMI
MONTGOME RY
GREENE
WARREN
Dayton
Troy
Xenia
§̈¦I 75
§̈¦I 675
§̈¦I 70
§̈¦I 71
§̈¦I 75
0 4 82Miles
Manufacturing Acreage as aPercent of TAZ Acreage
80th to 90th Percentile (21.3% - 30.9%)
Industrial Land Use – Building-Based AnalysisFood and Drink
Processing Plants andStorage
1,416,948 (1%)
Light to MediumManufacturing andAssembly Plants
48,113,840 (35%)Industrial Warehousesand Truck Terminals28,059,237 (20%)
Small Shops12,528,905 (9%)
Other IndustrialStructures
5,751,701 (4%)
Unclassified IndustrialLand
21,429,134 (16%) Foundries and HeavyManufacturing Plants
20,145,100 (15%)
Industrial Land Use – Building-Based Analysis
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Greene County Miami County Montgomery County Warren County*
Unclassified IndustrialLand
Food and DrinkProcessing Plants andStorageOther IndustrialStructures
Small Shops
Foundries and HeavyManufacturing Plants
Industrial Warehousesand Truck Terminals
Light to MediumManufacturing andAssembly Plant
Industrial Land Use – Market Analysis
MIAMI
MONTGOME RY
GREENE
WARREN
Dayton
Troy
Xenia
§̈¦I 75
§̈¦I 675
§̈¦I 70
§̈¦I 71
§̈¦I 75
0 4 82Miles
Industrial Parcel Categories
Vacant - Unbuil t
Food and Drink Processing Plants and Storage
Foundries and Heavy Manufacturing Plants
Medium to Light Manufacturing and Assembly Plants
Industrial Warehouses and Truck Terminals
Small Shops (Machine , Tool and Die, Etc.)
Other Industrial Structures
Unclassified
WARREN
¨̈̈̈̈̈̈̈¦¦̈̈̈̈̈̈̈̈̈̈̈̈̈̈̈̈§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§
MIAMI
MONTGOME RY
GREENEGREENE
Xenia
¨̈̈̈̈̈¦¦¦̈̈̈̈̈̈̈̈§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§Troy
¨̈¦¦¦¦̈̈̈̈§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§
¨̈̈¦¦¦¦¦̈̈̈̈̈̈§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§
Dayton
¦̈¦̈̈§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§̈̈̈§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§
DaytonDayton
¨̈̈̈̈¦¦¦¦¦¦̈̈̈̈̈̈̈̈̈̈§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§
DaytonDayton
¨̈̈̈̈̈̈¦¦¦¦¦¦̈̈̈̈̈̈̈̈̈̈̈̈§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§̈̈̈̈̈̈̈̈§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
Industrial Land Use – Market Analysis
Unclassified Vacant - Unbuilt
Food and Drink Processing Plants
and StorageFoundries and Heavy Manufacturing Plants
Light to Medium Manufacturing and Assembly Plants
Industrial Warehouses and Truck Terminals Small shops
Other Industrial Structures
Fairborn 0.00 (0%) 1,063.51 (89.47%) 0.00 (0%) 3.66 (0.31%) 10.96 (0.92%) 43.96 (3.70%) 0.00 (0%) 66.65 (5.61%)
Franklin 0.24 (0.05%) 207.74 (40.48%) 0.00 (0%) 24.68 (4.81%) 208.02 (40.53%) 31.59 (6.15%) 22.05 (4.30%) 18.92 (3.69%)Montgomery
County/North I-75 9.89 (1.31%) 386.00 (51.06%) 0.00 (0%) 0.00 (0%) 177.95 (23.54%) 98.91 (13.08%) 69.10 (9.14%) 14.10 (1.87%)
North Dayton 134.43 (14.94%) 53.90 (5.99%) 0.00 (0%) 60.61 (6.74%) 210.86 (23.44%) 284.07 (31.58%) 94.19 (10.47%) 61.50 (6.84%)
East Dayton 288.86 (27.84%) 29.68 (2.86%) 11.41 (1.10%) 45.32 (4.37%) 170.45 (16.43%) 193.54 (18.65%) 106.04 (10.22%) 192.25 (18.53%)
Piqua 0.04 (0%) 314.69 (30.86%) 1.10 (0.11%) 52.33 (5.13%) 433.90 (42.55%) 82.51 (8.09%) 48.86 (4.79%) 86.30 (8.46%)
South Dayton/Moraine 407.17 (27.19%) 117.78 (7.87%) 0.12 (0.01%) 394.80 (26.37%) 216.98 (14.49%) 170.13 (11.36%) 66.03 (4.41%) 124.27 (8.30%)
Springboro 0.00 (0%) 135.00 (29.35%) 1.56 (0.34%) 0.00 (0%) 170.82 (37.14%) 88.16 (19.17%) 21.04 (4.57%) 43.33 (9.42%)
Tipp City 0.00 (0%) 85.65 (16.66%) 1.58 (0.31%) 0.00 (0%) 101.15 (19.67%) 194.66 (37.86%) 22.62 (4.40%) 108.46 (21.10%)
Troy 1.83 (0.16%) 368.67 (33.04%) 29.83 (2.67%) 0.00 (0%) 348.38 (31.22%) 210.42 (18.86%) 66.11 (5.92%) 90.72 (8.13%)
Xenia 0.00 (0%) 121.42 (31.07%) 51.41 (13.15%) 4.51 (1.15%) 109.90 (28.12%) 19.90 (5.09%) 10.13 (2.59%) 73.54 (18.82%)
Industrial Land by Category by Market
Industrial Land Use – Market Analysis
Unclassified
Food and Drink Processing Plants
and StorageFoundries and Heavy Manufacturing Plants
Light to Medium Manufacturing and Assembly Plants
Industrial Warehouses and Truck Terminals Small shops
Other Industrial Structures
Fairborn 0.00 (0%) 0.00 (0%) 48,706 (6.62%) 355,129 (48.24%) 286,986 (38.98%) 0.00 (0%) 45,419 (6.17%)
Franklin 0.00 (0%) 0.00 (0%) 52,920 (9.30%) 312,849 (55.01%) 19,850 (3.49%) 95,908 (16.86%) 87,203 (15.33%)Montgomery
County/North I-75 21,901 (0.37%) 0.00 (0%) 0.00 (0%) 3,947,397 (66.74%) 1,776,492 (30.04%) 151,444 (2.56%) 17,077 (0.29%)
North Dayton 1,515,673 (9.21%) 0.00 (0%) 808,040 (4.91%) 4,090,520 (24.85%) 7,964,935 (48.39%) 1,999,165 (12.14%) 82,923 (0.50%)
East Dayton 6,138,608 (32.21%) 214,090 (1.12%) 1,345,576 (7.06) 3,914,618 (20.54%) 3,632,195 (19.06%) 2,401,361 (12.60%) 1,411,706 (7.41%)
Piqua 0.00 (0%) 2,688 (0.06%) 338,685 (7.98%) 2,661,776 (62.71%) 578,503 (13.63%) 395,265 (9.31%) 267,847 (6.31%)
South Dayton/Moraine 6,683,610 (21.33%) 5,210 (0.02%) 13,341,889 (42.58%) 3,316,158 (10.58%) 5,503,059 (17.56%) 1,585,452 (5.06%) 895,041 (2.86%)
Springboro 0.00 (0%) 8,080 (1.27%) 0.00 (0%) 229,068 (35.93%) 371,781 (58.31%) 28,690 (4.50%) 0.00 (0%)
Tipp City 0.00 (0%) 0.00 (0%) 0.00 (0%) 1,043,338 (63.63%) 129,864 (7.92%) 195,413 (11.92%) 270,961 (16.53%)
Troy 0.00 (0%) 80,295 (1.91%) 0.00 (0%) 1,671,190 (39.73%) 1,781,179 (42.34%) 513,199 (12.20%) 160,599 (3.82%)
Xenia 0.00 (0%) 76,187 (2.61%) 58,949 (2.61%) 782,930 (34.63%) 758,076 (33.53%) 46,924 (2.08%) 537,542 (23.78%)
Industrial GFA by Category by Market
Industrial Employment1980 1990 2000 2005
Greene 3,852 4,248 5,343 5,384Miami 14,390 13,700 15,323 14,727Montgomery 65,461 59,865 59,165 52,454Warren* 3,287 3,271Regional Total** 83,703 77,813 79,831 72,565
2010 2020 2030 2040Greene 4,055 4,157 4,189 4,125Miami 11,318 11,368 11,142 10,742Montgomery 40,553 39,390 37,900 34,890Warren* 3,741 4,449 5,331 6,097Regional Total 59,667 59,363 58,562 55,854
Upper Level Projection
Lower Level Projection
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
2010 2020 2030 2040
2010 2020 2030 2040Greene 4,329 4,057 3,845 3,642Miami 12,084 11,095 10,228 9,484Montgomery 43,295 38,446 34,789 30,804Warren* 3,741 4,449 5,331 6,097Regional Total 63,448 58,046 54,193 50,027
Historic Industrial Employment
Upper Level Projection
Lower Level Projection
Conclusions
The Region’s most prominent industrial category is Light to Medium Manufacturing and Assembly Plants
High levels of Vacant - Unbuilt industrial land are also present, especially in Greene County
Industrial development has been, and is expected to continue to be, on the decline in the Miami Valley Region
Projected decreases in industrial employment could result in further decreases in the share of developed land that has been allocated for industrial use
For More Information
Contact Katy Bowman, Research Associate, at [email protected]