52

The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

My talk about creativity and effectiveness a

Citation preview

Page 1: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011
Page 2: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011

“Creativity is irrelevant at best. Often, it is downright harmful to advertising success.”

Page 3: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011

“The more creative a campaign, the higher the likelihood that the featured product will

sell. Other things being equal, creativity is an advertiser’s best bet.”

- McKinsey & Company, 2006

Page 4: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011
Page 5: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011

E!ectiveness Awards Won per $1B Billed

Page 6: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011

E!ectiveness Awards Won per $1B Billed

Less Creatively-Awarded Agencies:

5.4

Page 7: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011

E!ectiveness Awards Won per $1B Billed

Most Creatively- Awarded Agencies:

13.7 Less Creatively-

Awarded Agencies:

5.4

Page 8: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011

Campaign E!ectiveness Success Rate

Page 9: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011

Non-Creatively-Awarded Campaigns:

80%

Campaign E!ectiveness Success Rate

Page 10: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011

Non-Creatively-Awarded Campaigns:

80% Creatively-Awarded

Campaigns:

88%

Campaign E!ectiveness Success Rate

Page 11: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011

Campaign E"ciency

Page 12: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011

Campaign E"ciency

Non-Creatively-Awarded Campaigns:

0.5

Page 13: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011

Campaign E"ciency

Non-Creatively-Awarded Campaigns:

0.5 Creatively-Awarded

Campaigns:

5.7

Page 14: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011

Company Perceptions

Page 15: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011

Company Perceptions

A smart company

57%

34%

More creative

Less creative

Page 16: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011

Company Perceptions

A smart company High

quality products

57%

34%

78%

57%

More creative

Less creative

More creative

Less creative

Page 17: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011

Company Perceptions

A smart company High

quality products

Worth purchasing

from

57%

34%

78%

57% 68%

39%

More creative

Less creative

More creative

Less creative

More creative

Less creative

Page 18: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011

Share Price Growth 2000-2009

Page 19: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011

S&P500

0.5%

Share Price Growth 2000-2009

Page 20: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011

S&P500

0.5% Cannes Advertisers of the Year

41%

Share Price Growth 2000-2009

Page 21: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011

’91 USA Creative Advertising & the von Restor! E!ect

’92 USA On Resonance: A Critical Pluralistic Enquiry into Advertising Rhetoric

’95 USA Creativity vs E!ectiveness? An Integrating Classi"cation for Advertising

’96 USA Do Award Winning Commercials Sell?

’00 USA Recall, Liking and Creativity in TV Commercials

’02 NLD Breaking Through the Clutter: Bene"ts of Advertisement Originality

’05 USA Recall & Persuasion: Does Creative Advertising Matter?

’07 GBR Marketing in the Era of Accountability

’07 DEU Art Meets Science: Creative Advertising Examined

’08 USA The Impact of Advertising Creativity on the Hierarchy of E!ects

’08 SWE Advertising Creativity Matters

’08 NZL Creative = E!ective

’09 USA Beyond Attention E!ects: Modelling the E!ects of Advertising Creativity

’10 NZL Creative = Successful

’10 GBR The Link Between Creativity and E!ectiveness

Page 22: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011

Campaign E"ciency

Page 23: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011

Campaign E"ciency

1994 - 2002

3x Creatively-awarded

Non-creatively-awarded

Page 24: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011

Campaign E"ciency

1994 - 2002

Creatively-awarded

Non-creatively-awarded

2003 - 2010

3x

12x

Creatively-awarded

Non-creatively-awarded

Page 25: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011

Why?

Page 26: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011
Page 27: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011
Page 28: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011
Page 29: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011
Page 30: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011
Page 31: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011
Page 32: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011
Page 33: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011

“Up until 2002, 78% of consumers said advertising was a good way to learn about new products. In the

four years that followed, that "gure dropped to 53%.”

- Forrester Research 2006

Page 34: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011

10-24%

of people believe companies tell the truth in advertising

50-80%

trust what they hear about a company from their friends and peers

Page 35: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011

Peoples’ perceptions of brands are being shaped more and more by

conversations and less and less by marketing messages

Page 36: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011

E!ectiveness Success Rate

Page 37: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011

Rational

59%

E!ectiveness Success Rate

Page 38: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011

Rational

59%

E!ectiveness Success Rate

Emotional

68%

Page 39: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011

Rational

59% Fame

72%

E!ectiveness Success Rate

Emotional

68%

Page 40: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011

“People don’t read ads. They read things that interest them. Sometimes that happens to be an ad.” - Howard Gossage, 1955

Page 41: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011

“People don’t talk about brands. They talk about

things that interest them. Sometimes that

happens to be a brand.”

Page 42: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011

Campaigns Creating Conversation / “Fame”

Page 43: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011

Non-Creatively-Awarded Campaigns:

29%

Campaigns Creating Conversation / “Fame”

Page 44: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011

Non-Creatively-Awarded Campaigns:

29% Creatively-Awarded

Campaigns:

70%

Campaigns Creating Conversation / “Fame”

Page 45: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011
Page 46: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011
Page 47: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011
Page 48: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011
Page 49: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011
Page 50: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011
Page 51: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011

Our objective is e!ectiveness. Our strategy is creativity.

- BBH

Page 52: The Case for Creativity - Spikes 2011

Thank You.