Plan for the morning

Workshop 1, 7.11.2015, 09.30 – 10:00: Introduction to new fundraising trends and concepts

• Introduction• Interview with Christian

Sørensen

Workshop 3, 7.11.2015, 11.30 – 13.30: Erasmus+

Workshop 2, 7.11.2015, 10.00-11.00: Corporate fundraising

• Michal Rynkowski, Directorate General for Education and Culture, European Commission

• Erasmus+ project development working groups

• Kai Troll, ISCA Development Director

TRACK 3- FUNDRAISE, PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT TRAINING

Workshop 1, 7.11.2015, : Introduction to new fundraising trends and concepts

Speakers: Marvin Radford, ISCA Head of External Relations and Fundraising; Christian Haahr Sørensen, Development Consultant at DGI Lab

• Social Impact Funding• Payment by Results • Cause Marketing• Monitoring and evaluation • Multi-donor co-financing for projects and initiatives• Retention and development of existing funding sources

TRACK 3- FUNDRAISE, PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT TRAINING

Workshop 2, 7.11.2015,  Corporate fundraising

Unique selling points we offer to companies; Developing clear strategic aims/objectives for corporate engagement; How your organisation can benefit from corporate social responsibility; Leveraging corporate employee engagement; Case study for corporate engagement.

Speakers: Kai Troll, ISCA Development Director

TRACK 3- FUNDRAISE, PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT TRAINING

Workshop 3, 7.11.2015,  Erasmus+

Updates on the Erasmus+ Sport programme; Working group sessions for developing your engagement in future Erasmus+ funding applications; Working groups will be facilitated by professional project managers and developers with experience in preparing and submitting proposals to European funding programmes.

Speakers: Michal Rynkowski, Directorate General for Education and Culture, European Commission;

Marvin Radford, ISCA Head of External Relations and Fundraising.

Impact investing refers to investments "made into companies, organizations, and funds with the intention to generate a measurable, beneficial social or environmental impact alongside a financial return"[1] It is a form of socially responsible investing that serves as a guide for various investment strategies.[2]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impact_investing

Social Impact Measurement refers to measuring the results of your work. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BgI3rzO3mHk

Proposed Approaches to Social Impact Measurement in European Commission legislation and in practice relating to:

EuSEFs and the EaSI GECES Sub-group on Impact Measurement

The Single Market Act IIi states that “the Commission will develop a methodology to measure the socioeconomic benefits created by social enterprises. The development of rigorous and systematic measurements of social enterprises’ impact on the community … is essential to demonstrate that the money invested in social enterprises yields high savings and income”. The Programme for Employment and Social Innovationii also foresees, in its third axis (Microfinance and Social Entrepreneurship), that the implementation reports to be sent to the Commission by financial institutions and fund managers also report on the results in terms of social impact. The GECES sub-group on Social Impact Measurement was therefore set up in October 2012 to agree upon a European methodology which could be applied across the European social economy. Impact measurement has a terminology that is in common use across much of the social sector, although there is some blending of them in some circles. Five key terms exist and are adopted here: • Inputs: what resources are used in delivery of the intervention • Activity: what is being done with those resources by the social enterprise (the intervention) • Output: how that activity touches the intended beneficiaries • Outcome: the change arising in the lives of beneficiaries and others • Impact: the extent to which that change arises from the interventionhttp://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/social_business/docs/expert-group/social_impact/140605-sub-group-report_en.pdf

Payment by Results (PbR) is type of public policy instruments where payments are contingent on the independent verification of results. It is being actively promoted by a number of governments for more effective implementation of domestic policy.[1][2]

There is also increasing interest in the field of international development, where PBR is often referred to either as 'results-based aid' (where the funding relationship is between a donor and a recipient country) or 'results-based financing' (where the funding relationship is between a developing country government or a development agency, and public or private sector providers). There are also a number of other terms in use which can often lead to confusion and a lack of clarity.[3]

PbR instruments have three key features:• Payments for pre-agreed results• Recipient discretion over how the results are achieved• Independent verification as the trigger for disbursement

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Payment_by_Results

Monitoring and Evaluation of your projects and initiatives provides:• Accountability for enhanced learning (internal)• Knowledge from that informs future planning

and programming (and funding)• Knowledge that increases the impact of your

work, thus increasing value of your work to your funding partners.

Multi-donor co-financing is combining revenue and income streams to generate enough funds to fulfill specific expenditure needs.

Projects and activities can have multiple donors.

Consider how the demands and expectations of each donor fits your administration needs. Do you have the capacity to meet demands of multiple donors? (accounting requirements for example)

Retention and development of existing donor sources

The most likely donors are those who already know and support your work.

Use ‘story telling’ and ‘narrative development’ to maintain close contact, understanding and buy-in of your current donors. In the case of ‘public sector’ donors, maintain contact with key decision makers/policy makers.

Consider, how might the ‘impact’ of your work be used to lobby and Advocate?