Upload
independent
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Geological sources of boron and fluoride anomaliesin Silurian–Ordovician aquifer system, Estonia
Marge Uppin • Enn Karro
Received: 16 December 2010 / Accepted: 17 September 2011 / Published online: 1 October 2011
� Springer-Verlag 2011
Abstract The objective of this study was to examine the
possible natural sources of fluorides and boron in Silurian–
Ordovician (S–O) aquifer system, as the anomaly of these
elements has been distinguished in groundwater of western
Estonia. Water–rock interactions, such as dissolution and
leaching of the host rock, are considered to be the main
source of high fluoride and boron concentrations in
groundwater. Altogether 91 rock samples were analysed to
determine if high F- and B levels in groundwater could be
attributed to certain aquifer forming rock types. Fluorine
and boron contents in limestones and dolomites vary from
100 to 500 mg/kg and 5 to 20 mg/kg, reaching up to 1,000
and 150 mg/kg in marlstones, respectively. K-bentonites,
altered volcanic ash beds, are rich in fluorine (400–
4,500 mg/kg) and boron (50–1,000 mg/kg). Thus, clay-rich
sediments, providing ion-exchange and adsorption sites for
F- and B, are the probable sources of both elements in S–O
aquifer system in western Estonia.
Keywords Boron � Fluorine � Carbonate rocks �Silurian–Ordovician aquifer system � Estonia
Introduction
The occurrence of fluorine (F) and boron (B) in ground-
water has drawn worldwide attention due to their important
physiological role in the health of man. Fluorine is a
ubiquitous element in continental crust, with an average
concentration of 625 ppm (Edmunds and Smedley 2005). It
is the most electronegative and reactive element which
occurs in water primarily as a negatively charged ion—
fluoride (F-) (Hem 1985). Fluoride is mainly released into
the groundwater through weathering and leaching of the
fluorine-containing minerals in rocks. The most common
fluorine-bearing mineral in the geological environment is
fluorite (CaF2). Fluorine is also abundant in various other
rock-forming minerals, for example, apatite, micas,
amphiboles, and certain clay minerals (Hem 1985; Saxena
and Ahmed 2003; Sujatha 2003; Edmunds and Smedley
2005; Rafique et al. 2008; Naseem et al. 2010). Because of
similar ionic radii, fluoride can easily replace hydroxyl ion
(OH-) in many rock-forming minerals. High fluorine
contents are associated with volcanic activities. Thus,
elevated concentrations of F- are often found in geother-
mal waters (Kundu et al. 2001; Desbarats 2009). Besides,
fresh volcanic ash may be rather rich in fluoride, and ash
interbedded with other sediments could contribute later to
high fluoride concentrations in groundwater in such areas
(Hem 1985). Therefore, high F- contents in water could be
found in the areas, where F-bearing minerals are abundant
in the rocks.
Small doses of fluoride have beneficial effect on teeth by
hardening the enamel and reducing the incidence of caries.
On the other hand, concentrations of fluoride above
1.5 mg/l in drinking water may cause dental fluorosis
(Grobler et al. 1986; ADA 2001; Billings et al. 2004; WHO
2008). According to the EU directive 98/83/Council
directive 98/83/EC (1998) and Estonian requirements for
drinking water quality (Joogivee 2001), the limit value for
fluoride is 1.5 mg/l.
Boron (B) is widely distributed in nature with average
concentration of 10 ppm in the earth’s crust (Yazbeck et al.
2005). It is a minor dissolved constituent of groundwater
where it is often associated with F- (Queste et al. 2001;
M. Uppin (&) � E. Karro
Department of Geology, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences,
University of Tartu, Ravila 14A, 50411 Tartu, Estonia
e-mail: [email protected]
123
Environ Earth Sci (2012) 65:1147–1156
DOI 10.1007/s12665-011-1363-7
Earle and Krogh 2004; Desbarats 2009). In aqueous solu-
tions, boron is mostly present as B(OH)4- ion and undis-
sociated boric acid B(OH)3 (Mather and Porteous 2001;
Gonfiantini and Pennisi 2006; Pennisi et al. 2006), and the
occurrence of these species in environment is controlled by
the pH. Boron is mainly released into the groundwater
through the weathering of rocks, seawater intrusion into
aquifers, and volcanic activity (Hem 1985; Pennisi et al.
2006). Therefore, the leaching of rocks and soils is
responsible for the most of the boron dissolved in natural
waters. Boron undergoes a number of interactions with the
aquifer-forming rocks, among which the process of
adsorption and desorption of boron to clay mineral surfaces
plays a crucial role (Gonfiantini and Pennisi 2006; Pennisi
et al. 2006).
High boron levels in drinking water are considered to
bear risks for human health. The World Health Organisa-
tion guideline value for boron is 0.5 mg/l (WHO 2008).
However, the limit value for boron in drinking water is
1.0 mg/l in Estonia (Council directive 98/83/EC 1998;
Joogivee 2001). The long-term experiments with animals
have shown that excessive content of boron leads to
reduced fertility and sterility, low weight of foetus, me-
tabolistic disorders and acute neurological effects (Heindel
et al. 1992; Price et al. 1996; WHO 2008). However,
human data are lacking, the only available data show that
acute exposure is associated with short-term irritant effects
of the upper respiratory tract (Garabrant et al. 1985;
Wegman et al. 1994).
Silurian–Ordovician (S–O) aquifer system provides 30%
of Estonian public water supply, being the most important
drinking water source in central and western Estonia.
Previous hydrochemical studies have shown that high
fluoride and boron values in S–O aquifer system are mostly
present in western Estonia (Karro et al. 2006, 2009; Karro
and Uppin 2010). The natural concentrations on boron and
fluorides in groundwater reach up to 2.1 and 7.2 mg/l,
respectively. The health risks in Estonia arising from
drinking water are mainly due to the high levels of fluoride
and boron in groundwater (Saava 1998; Indermitte et al.
2006; Indermitte 2010). A strong relationship between the
fluoride content in drinking water and the prevalence of
dental fluorosis among 12-year-old schoolchildren in
Estonia has been found (Indermitte et al. 2007).
The groundwater chemistry is controlled among the
other factors by the lithological composition of water-
bearing rocks. Presence of fluorine and boron-bearing
minerals in the host rock and their interaction with water
are considered to be the main causes for fluoride and boron
enrichment in groundwater. The aim of this paper is to
present the results of geochemical and mineralogical study
of Silurian and Ordovician carbonate rocks as the natural
fluorine and boron sources in Estonia, focusing on the
occurrence and variability of F and B contents in different
rock types. Furthermore, the other possible geological
reasons of the fluoride and boron anomalies in S–O aquifer
system in western Estonia are discussed. As the collected
rock samples originate from different geological units of
Silurian and Ordovician System, and in places the number
of samples was taken along the vertical geological cross
section; the spatial distribution of fluorine and boron in
Silurian and Ordovician rocks has not been studied in this
research. To perform the throughout and representative
geochemical mapping of F and B, denser sampling set
should be designed.
Study area
Estonia is situated in the north-western part of the East-
European Platform. Its sedimentary beds, lying on the
southern slope of the Baltic Shield, are declined south-
wards at about 3–4 m per km. The Estonian Paleoprote-
rozoic basement is overlaid by Neoproterozoic (Ediacaran)
and Palaeozoic (Cambrian, Ordovician, Silurian and
Devonian) sedimentary rocks (Fig. 1) covered by Quater-
nary deposits. Both Ordovician and Silurian sequences in
Estonia consist mainly of shallow water carbonates—
limestone, dolomite, and marlstone with clayey interlayers.
Exceptionally, the basal part of Ordovician sequence is
represented by terrigenous sediments—silty and clayey
sandstones and graptolite argillites.
Two main structural elements of the Baltic Ordovician
Basin are distributed in Estonia: the marginal confacies belt
(North Estonian Confacies Belt) and the central confacies
belt (Central Baltoscandian Confacies Belt, including the
Livonian Tongue). A transitional zone between the above
mentioned belts has also been distinguished (Fig. 2a). The
marginal belt was dominated by shallow water carbonate
sediments with a lot of discontinuity surfaces, while the
relatively deeper water central belt comprised predomi-
nantly clayey sediments such as clayey limestones and
marlstones (Nestor and Einasto 1997). The Ordovician
System in Estonia is divided into three series: Lower-,
Middle- and Upper Ordovician, which are subdivided into
different regional stages (Table 1).
During the Silurian, relatively shallow water sedimen-
tary conditions prevailed in Estonia. Based on the facies
changes of the Silurian rocks, the Mid-Estonian and
South-Estonian confacies belts have been distinguished.
The Mid-Estonian Confacies Belt is dominated by various
limestones and dolomites. The belt covers the islands of
West-Estonian Archipelago and the western and central
parts of mainland Estonia. The South-Estonian Confacies
Belt consists mostly of marlstones. The composition of
sediments, mainly clay content, reflects the sea level
1148 Environ Earth Sci (2012) 65:1147–1156
123
changes of the Silurian Basin. The Silurian transgression
maximum coincides with Juuru, Adavere and Jaani Stage,
which corresponds to maximum amount of clay in car-
bonates. The proportion of clay content increases to
southwards or south-westerly (Fig. 2b) (Nestor and Ein-
asto 1997). The Silurian System is divided into four series
(Pridoli, Ludlow, Venlock, Llandovery) and ten regional
stages (Table 1).
The Silurian and Ordovician stratigraphic record in
Estonia and neighbouring areas contains numerous K-rich
altered volcanic ash beds—K-bentonites. The thickness of
bentonites ranges from some mm up to 10 cm, rarely up to
20–30 cm and more (Bergstrom et al. 1995; Kiipli et al.
2001; Hints et al. 2008). The composition of bentonite clay
matrix in the Baltic Basin is typically mixed-layer illite–
smectite with some amount of kaolinite (Kiipli et al. 2007;
Hints et al. 2008; Somelar et al. 2010), except of the
bentonites of Pirgu age which are characterized by chlorite-
smectite type mixed-layer minerals (Hints et al. 2006). The
interlayers of K-bentonite have been recorded in Jaagarahu,
Jaani, Adavere and Raikkula Stages of Silurian System.
Ordovician K-bentonite beds in Estonia are present only in
the Upper Ordovician Series: Kukruse, Haljala, Keila and
Pirgu Stages (Bergstrom et al. 1995; Kiipli et al. 2001,
2008; Hints et al. 2008; Somelar et al. 2010).
Ordovician and Silurian carbonate rocks (Fig. 1,
Table 1) form the S–O aquifer system, which is an
important and often the only source of drinking water in
central and western Estonia and on islands of the West-
Estonian archipelago. The upper part of the S–O aquifer
system with a thickness of 30 m is extremely cavernous,
with numerous cracks and fissures. Water in the fissure
systems and karst cavities of the carbonate bedrock flows
relatively fast. Silurian and Ordovician carbonate rocks
have fragmentary 1–2-m thick water-conducting zones
with parallel lamination and an abundance of fissures,
where groundwater flows in a lateral direction. These zones
are separated from each other by 5–10-m thick layers in
which groundwater flows predominantly in vertical
fissures. The caverns and fissures decrease in the deeper
Fig. 1 Location of the study
area with sampling sites
(number of samples are marked
in brackets) and geological
cross section of Estonia
Environ Earth Sci (2012) 65:1147–1156 1149
123
part of the S–O aquifer system and the aquifer system
transforms into aquitard (Perens and Vallner 1997).
The S–O aquifer system has a characteristic of HCO3–
Ca–Mg and HCO3–Mg–Ca water type with total dissolved
solids (TDS) mainly below 0.6 g/l in its upper 30–50-m
thick portion. In coastal areas and greater depths, the
content of Cl- and Na? in groundwater increases and
HCO3–Cl–Na–Mg–Ca water type with TDS between 0.3
and 1.5 g/l is widespread (Perens et al. 2001).
Materials and methods
Ninety-one samples were collected from drillcores and out-
crops during 2008 and 2009 to study the chemical
composition of the aquifer forming Silurian and Ordovician
rocks (Fig. 1). The samples were analysed for fluorine, boron,
and other major and minor chemical constituents (SiO2,
Al2O3, Fe2O3, MgO, CaO, Na2O, K2O, TiO2, P2O5, MnO,
Cr2O3, Ba, Sr, Cu, Ni, Co). Rock samples were crushed and
pulverized to 200 mesh and dried at 105�C prior to analysis.
The chemical composition of the rocks was determined using
standard ICP-ES and ICP-MS techniques, content of fluorine
was analysed by specific ion electrode at ACME Analytical
Laboratories Ltd., Vancouver, Canada.
The relative content of terrigenous (Ter), dolomite (Dol)
and calcite (Cal) fractions in rocks was calculated to
determine how F and B are related to different rock types.
The content of Ter, Dol and Cal component in carbonate
rocks was calculated according to the following formulas
taking into consideration that terrigenous material con-
tained on average 2.5% MgO (Kaljo et al. 1997):
Ter ¼ Al2O3 þ SiO2 þ Fe2O3 þ K2Oþ TiO2ð Þ � 1:025
Dol ¼ 4:57� MgO� 0:025� Terð ÞCal ¼ 1:786� CaO� 0:304� Dolð Þ
The results obtained were recalculated normalizing the sum
of Ter ? Cal ? Dol to 100%.
To identify the main minerals (quartz, calcite, dolomite,
apatite, K-feldspar, albite, illite, kaolinite, chlorite, pyrite,
biotite) of Silurian and Ordovician carbonate rocks, 10
unoriented powdered whole rock preparations were ana-
lysed by means of X-ray powder diffractometry (XRD).
XRD analyses were carried out at the Department of
Geology, Tartu University. The purpose of the XRD study
was to compare the calculated mineralogical composition
with the results of XRD determinations. The whole-rock
mineralogical composition by XRD fairly agrees with
calculated values. Thus, calculation methodology provided
by Kaljo et al. (1997) could be used in this study.
For data processing, interpretation and visualization
MapInfo professional 6.5, AquaChem 3.70 and Grapher 8
were used.
Results and discussion
Altogether the composition of 91 rock (79 carbonate rock
and 12 K-bentonite) samples all over the Estonia was
studied to determine the chemical composition of the
sedimentary rocks forming the S–O aquifer system
(Fig. 1). Carbonate rocks in this research are classified as
stated by Vingisaar et al. (1965) as follows: limestones,
dolomites, clayey limestones and dolomites, marlstones,
domerites, and clay. This simplified classification is based
on the clay content in carbonaceous rocks, and is used in all
tables and diagrams in this paper.
Fig. 2 a Late Ordovician facies belts (after Ainsaar and Meidla
2001). The hatched area is the transition zone according to Polma
(1982), dotted line is the northern limit of the distribution of
Ordovician sedimentary rocks. b Terrigenous sediments in Silurian
basin of Estonia (after Jurgenson 1988). Distribution of Silurian rocks
is marked with grey colour
1150 Environ Earth Sci (2012) 65:1147–1156
123
A positive correlation between dissolved fluoride, boron
and pH has been observed in Estonian groundwater (Karro
and Rosentau 2005; Karro et al. 2006), thus, it can be
assumed that both fluorine and boron have similar origin
and undergo similar geochemical reactions in S–O aquifer
system of Estonia. Previous groundwater studies have
shown that high fluoride (up to 7.2 mg/l) and boron
(2.1 mg/l) concentrations are widespread in western Esto-
nia (Karro and Rosentau 2005; Karro et al. 2006, 2009;
Karro and Uppin 2010). Groundwater in S–O aquifer sys-
tem is mainly HCO3–Ca–Mg type and owing to the high
Ca2? contents, quite low amounts of F- may be mobilised.
The highest F- concentrations prevail in wells, which
produce the water with low Ca2? content. The pH of
groundwater and the contents of Na? and Cl- increase with
depth and the groundwater changes towards HCO3–Na–Cl
chemical type. Thus, geochemically favourable conditions
for high dissolved F- in water prevail in deeper portions of
S–O aquifer system (Karro et al. 2006).
According to the results of the rock analyses, the same
pattern in distribution of F and B in aquifer-forming rocks
is not evident. The F and B contents in the rocks depend on
the composition and the type of the rock and show wide
concentration range all over the study area.
The average concentrations and some other descriptive
statistics of boron and fluorine in different rock types are
given in Table 2. The results of the present research show
that the total fluorine and boron content of limestones and
dolomites are 70–1,001 and 3–54 mg/kg, respectively,
being slightly higher in dolomites. Cal–Dol–clay ternary
diagram could be useful to illustrate how F and B con-
centrations vary in different rock types. Generally, the
increase of the clay content is followed by the increase in
the F and B concentrations in the carbonate rocks (Fig. 3).
K-bentonite samples as non-carbonate rocks are not pre-
sented in ternary diagrams.
The fluorine and boron contents in marlstones and
domerites reach up to 1,030 and 160 mg/kg, respectively,
Table 1 Stratigraphy and lithological characteristics of Estonian Ordovician and Silurian systems (after Raukas and Teedumae 1997)
System Series Stage Characteristic rocks Samples
Silurian Pridoli Ohesaare Domerite, limestone 49
Kaugatuma Marlstone, limestone 8
Ludlow Kuressaare Marlstone, clayey limestone
Paadla Limestone, dolomite 28; 50
Wenlock Rootsikula Clayey dolomite, limestone 3; 6
Jaagarahu Limestone, dolomite 20; 26; 27
Jaani Marlstone, domerite
Llandovery Adavere Marlstone, domerite 2; 55; 56; 58–66
Raikkula Limestone, dolomite 12; 13; 14; 23; 24; 25; 37
Juuru Clayey limestone, marlstone 15; 19; 21; 31
Ordovician Upper Ordovician Porkuni Limestone, dolomite 28; 93; 94
Pirgu Clayey limestone, marlstone 48; 88–92
Vormsi Clayey limestone, marlstone 87; 95; 96
Nabala Clayey limestone 33; 85; 86
Rakvere Limestone, marlstone 83; 84
Oandu Marlstone, limestone 1; 7; 10; 52; 54; 81; 82
Keila Marlstone, clayey limestone 30; 38–47; 51; 53; 79; 80
Haljala Clayey limestone, marlstone 4; 29; 32; 77; 78
Kukruse Limestone, clayey limestone 74; 75; 76
Middle Ordovician Uhaku Clayey limestone 72; 73
Lasnamagi Clayey limestone 9; 17; 71
Aseri Limestone
Kunda Limestone, sandy limestone 5; 69; 70
Volkhov Glauconitic limestone 11; 67; 68
Lower Ordovician Billingen Glauconitic limestone
Hunneberg Glauconitic sandstone
Varangu Clay
Pakerort Siltstone, sandstone
Environ Earth Sci (2012) 65:1147–1156 1151
123
thus being higher compared to limestones and dolomites
(Table 2). K-bentonites, a clay-rich sediments formed by
the weathering of volcanic ash deposits, are rich in total
fluorine (363–4,578 mg/kg) and boron (57–1,124 mg/kg).
Excluding the K-bentonite samples from the calculation,
the average concentrations of boron and fluorine in Silurian
and Ordovician carbonate rocks in Estonia are 36.0 and
459.5 mg/kg, respectively. As a comparison, the average
concentration for boron in earth’s crust is 10 mg/kg
(Yazbeck et al. 2005) and for fluorine 625 mg/kg (Edm-
unds and Smedley 2005).
Although fluorite (CaF2) is the most common fluorine-
bearing mineral, being abundant in granitic rocks (Hem
1985; Kundu et al. 2001; Saxena and Ahmed 2003; Sujatha
2003; Reddy et al. 2010), it is a minor accessory mineral in
carbonate rocks and its solubility in fresh water is low.
Biotite may be rich in fluorine and is common mineral in
granitic areas as well. In present research, small amount of
biotite was found only in terrigenous material, especially in
K-bentonite samples. Thus, dissolution of fluorite and
biotite is not the noteworthy source of fluorides in carbo-
naceous groundwater of Estonia.
Beside the fluorite and biotite, apatite and fluorapatite
are also considered to be possible sources of fluorides in
groundwaters in granitic areas (Hem 1985; Rafique et al.
2008; Desbarats 2009; Reddy et al. 2010). Although apatite
is present in carbonate rocks as well, it is unlikely the
major source of fluorides in groundwater. The S–O aquifer
system has a characteristic of HCO3–Ca–Mg and HCO3–
Mg–Ca water type, with low B and F concentrations. In
western Estonia, where high fluoride concentrations pre-
vail, the content of Cl- and Na? in groundwater increases
and HCO3–Cl–Na–Mg–Ca water type with increased pH
value becomes widespread (Perens et al. 2001). The solu-
bility of apatite is rather low and decreases with increasing
pH values (Leybourne et al. 2008; Desbarats 2009).
Consequently, Ca-phosphate minerals, containing fluorine
Table 2 Descriptive statistics for boron and fluorine concentrations in carbonaceous rock types
Rock type n Boron concentrations in rocks (mg/kg) Fluorine concentrations in rocks (mg/kg)
Mean Median Min. Max. Mean Median Min. Max.
Limestone 18 8.94 5.00 3.00 54.00 261.83 205.00 70.00 690.00
Dolomite 10 10.50 8.50 3.00 32.00 377.30 308.00 187.00 1,001.00
Clayey limestone 17 22.82 24.00 3.00 43.00 356.35 350.00 187.00 500.00
Clayey dolomite 8 24.63 24.00 9.00 38.00 443.88 425.00 264.00 660.00
Marlstone 12 89.00 73.00 33.00 160.00 771.33 760.00 525.00 1,029.00
Domerite 5 67.00 54.00 27.00 121.00 828.00 830.00 680.00 1,030.00
Clay 9 130.89 129.00 97.00 168.00 712.67 704.00 600.00 870.00
K-bentonite 12 438.17 309.00 57.00 1,124.00 2,813.42 3,069.00 363.00 4,578.00
Fig. 3 Ternary diagram showing F and B content in various rock
types. Classification of rocks is based on the lithological diagram of
carbonate rocks (Vingisaar et al. 1965): A limestone, B dolomite,
C marlstone, D domerite, E clay
1152 Environ Earth Sci (2012) 65:1147–1156
123
in their mineral lattice, may be rather one of the minor
geological sources of fluorides in S–O aquifer system. On the
other hand, substituted apatites with high fluorine are more
soluble than purer apatites (Edmunds and Smedley 2005).
Thus, to understand the mechanism of apatite dissolution,
additional leaching experiments should be carried out.
Remarkable amount of boron and fluorine in rocks is
considered to be related to clay minerals. Ion-exchange and
adsorption are the most typical processes through which
boron and fluorine could be bounded to clay minerals (Hem
1985; Saxena and Ahmed 2003; Sujatha 2003; Edmunds
and Smedley 2005; Gonfiantini and Pennisi 2006; Pennisi
et al. 2006; Rafique et al. 2008; Naseem et al. 2010). The
average clay content in the rocks of Silurian and Ordovician
sequences tends to increase from north to south and south-
west in the Baltic Basin (Nestor and Einasto 2007). Due to
the increase of clay content in aquifer-forming rocks and
prolonged residence time of groundwater, Ca is replaced by
Na through ion-exchange processes and pH value of
groundwater slightly increases (up to 8.5) in West-Estonia.
As a result, the formed alkaline Na-rich groundwater of
HCO3–Cl–Na–Mg–Ca chemical type favours the leaching
of boron and fluorine into the groundwater. Furthermore,
clay content is generally higher in Silurian carbonate rocks
compared to Ordovician ones. Former studies have shown
that the sea stand was higher in the Silurian compared to the
late Ordovician (Kiipli and Kiipli 2006), thus Silurian rocks
are expected to be more clayey. Long-term leaching of
those clayey rocks might provide the elevated fluoride and
boron content in groundwater of western Estonia.
According to this study, boron and fluorine are most likely
leached out from clayey material like marlstones, domerites
and K-bentonites. The CaO/Al2O3 and K2O/Al2O3 ratios
reflect the relationship between carbonaceous and terrigenous
component, and between terrigenous compounds (K-feldspar
and clay) in rock samples, respectively (Fig. 4a, b). K-ben-
tonite samples are not included to data used in these diagrams.
Higher values of CaO/Al2O3 ratios refer to carbonate rock
samples, lower ones to terrigenous material, including clay. It
can be seen that the values of CaO/Al2O3 ratios rapidly rise
in limestone and dolomite samples where the contents of B
and F are low, generally below 20 and 400 mg/kg, respec-
tively. Lower CaO/Al2O3 ratios (up to 25) refer to terrige-
nous material with elevated B (20–160 mg/kg) and F
(350–1,000 mg/kg) concentrations. Unlike the typical lime-
stones and dolomites, apatite-rich samples exhibit also high
fluorine content (450–1,000 mg/kg) (Fig. 4a).
Using the K2O/Al2O3 ratio as the indicator of terrige-
nous material, the lower ratios are the characteristic for a
finer grain size, higher ratios for coarser grain size. Fig. 4b
shows that the limestones and dolomites have K2O/Al2O3
ratios varying from 0.4 to 0.8 with low B (up to 20 mg/kg)
and F (up to 350 mg/kg) contents. K2O/Al2O3 ratios up to
0.5 are common to clayey rocks with higher B and F
concentrations. Exceptionally, rock samples rich in apatite
do not coincide with the rest of the limestone and dolomites
samples in the diagrams showing higher F concentrations
(Fig. 4b). Altogether, elevated B and F contents are clearly
concentrated in the terrigenous fraction of the rock
(Fig. 4a) and furthermore, are bounded to clay mineral
phases (Fig. 4b). The B content increases exponentially
with the clay amount, represented mainly by illitic clay
minerals (illite, illite–smectite). The abundance of illitic
clay minerals (0.7–32.5% of the whole rock) in rock
samples has been determined with XRD analyses. Thus,
clay-rich sediments, providing ion-exchange and adsorp-
tion sites for F- and B, may contribute to elevated con-
centrations of those elements in groundwater. The
geochemical behaviour of F is more complicated compared
to B due to the presence of Ca-phosphate (apatite and
fluorapatite) minerals, which occur both in terrigenous as
well as in authigenic fraction. As it was mentioned above,
elevated F concentrations may be also found in limestones
and dolomites poor in clay minerals (Fig. 4a, b). In such
samples, a positive correlation between fluorine and
phosphate (P2O5), which is a likely indicator of apatite and
fluorapatite, can be observed (Fig. 4c).
Analysing the chemical composition of aquifer-forming
rocks and water–rock interactions is an essential part of
groundwater studies, as the chemical composition of the
groundwater reflects the mineralogy of the host rock. In
addition to apparent relationships between fluorine and
boron concentrations and rock type, the influence of other
factors such as the residence time of groundwater, spatial
variations in pH values, Ca2? and Na? concentrations
(chemical type of water) play the important role in the
leaching of F and B into the groundwater.
Groundwater is an important source of drinking water
supply all over the world, including Estonia. Both fluorine and
boron are considered to be toxic in large quantities to human
body, acquired largely from drinking water and food (Zohouri
and Rugg-Gunn 2000; WHO 1998). Therefore, there is a need
for examining probable natural sources of F- and B in
groundwater. The results of current study give the first over-
view of the different rock types as the natural sources of these
elements in S–O aquifer system and could help to work out the
strategies for safe drinking water supply in Estonia.
Conclusions
Anomalously high fluoride and boron concentrations (up to
7.2 and 2.1 mg/l, respectively) are common in groundwater
in western Estonia, where main drinking water resource is
carbonaceous S–O aquifer system. Leaching of the host
rocks is the major natural source of F- and B in
Environ Earth Sci (2012) 65:1147–1156 1153
123
groundwater. Therefore, chemical composition of ninety-
one rock samples from S–O aquifer system forming rocks
was determined. The results of this study show that fluorine
and boron in carbonate rocks are clearly bounded to clay
mineral phase, as F and B content in marlstones reach up to
1,000 and 150 mg/kg, respectively, being even higher in
K-bentonites. F and B concentrations in limestones and
dolomites do not generally exceed 500 and 20 mg/kg,
respectively. Consequently, clay-rich sediments such as
marlstones, domerites and K-bentonites are the most
probable sources of high fluoride and boron levels in
groundwater. Ca-phosphate minerals are generally rich in
fluorine. Although, the solubility of apatite is rather slow, it
is unlikely the remarkable source of fluorides in ground-
water. Fluorite, the most common fluorine-bearing mineral,
and biotite are not widespread minerals in carbonate rocks.
Thus, dissolution of fluorite and biotite cannot be the
sources of fluorides in S–O aquifer system.
Acknowledgments This study has been carried out with the finan-
cial support of Estonian Science Foundation grant No 7403. The
authors thank Dr. Leho Ainsaar, Dr. Enli Kiipli and MSc. Tonu Pani
for the assistance with rock samples selection. Prof. Kalle Kirsimae is
acknowledged for the fruitful discussions in field of mineralogy. The
XRD analyses were carried out with the assistance of Dr. Peeter
Somelar at the Department of Geology, Tartu University. The chem-
ical analyses of rock samples were performed at ACME Analytical
Laboratories Ltd., Vancouver, Canada.
References
ADA (2001) Position of the American Dietetic Association: The
Impact of fluoride on health. J Am Diet Assoc 101:126–132
Fig. 4 The F and B concentrations plotted against the content of the major element oxides and their ratios in aquifer-forming rocks
1154 Environ Earth Sci (2012) 65:1147–1156
123
Ainsaar L, Meidla T (2001) Facies and stratigraphy of the Middle
Caradoc mixed siliciclastic-carbonate sediments in eastern
Baltoscandia. Proc Estonian Acad Sci Geol 50:5–23
Bergstrom SM, Huff WD, Kolata DR, Bauert H (1995) Nomencla-
ture, stratigraphy, chemical fingerprinting, and areal distribution
of some Middle Ordovician K-bentonites in Baltoscandia. GFF
117:1–13
Billings RJ, Berkowitz RJ, Watson G (2004) Teeth. Pediatrics
113:1120–1127
Council directive 98/83/EC (1998) On the quality of water intended
for human consumption. Official Journal L 330, 05/12/1998
P. 0032–0054
Desbarats A (2009) On elevated fluoride and boron concentrations in
groundwaters associated with the Lake Saint-Martin impact
structure, Manitoba. Appl Geochem 24:915–927
Earle S, Krogh E (2004) Geochemistry of Gabriola’s groundwater.
Shale 7:35–42
Edmunds M, Smedley P (2005) Fluoride in natural waters: occur-
rence, controls and health aspects. In: Selnius O, Alloway B,
Centeno JA, Finkleman RB, Fuge R, Lindh U, Smedley P (eds)
Essentials of medical geology—impacts of the natural environ-
ment on public health. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 301–329
Garabrant DH, Bernstein L, Peters JM, Smith TJ (1985) Respiratory
effects of borax dust. Br J Ind Med 42:831–837
Gonfiantini R, Pennisi M (2006) The behaviour of boron isotopes in
natural waters and in water–rock interactions. J Geochem Explor
88:114–117
Grobler SR, van Wyk CV, Kotze D (1986) Relationship between
enamel fluoride levels, degree of fluorosis and caries experience
in communities with a nearly optimal and high fluoride level in
the drinking water. Caries Res 20:284–288
Heindel JJ, Price CJ, Field EA (1992) Developmental toxicity of boric
acid in mice and rats. Fundam Appl Toxicol 18:266–277
Hem JD (1985) Study and interpretation of the chemical character-
istics of natural water. US Geological Survey Water-Supply
Paper 2254
Hints R, Kirsimae K, Somelar P, Kallaste T, Kiipli T (2006)
Chloritization of late Ordovician K-bentonites from the northern
Baltic Palaeobasin-influence from source material or diagenetic
environment. Sediment Geol 191:55–66
Hints R, Kirsimae K, Somelar P, Kallaste T, Kiipli T (2008)
Multiphase Silurian bentonites in the Baltic Palaeobasin.
Sediment Geol 209:69–79
Indermitte E (2010) Exposure to fluorides in drinking water and
dental fluorosis risk among the population of Estonia. Disserta-
tiones Geographicae Universitatis Tartuensis 41, Tartu Univer-
sity Press
Indermitte E, Saava A, Kull A (2006) The survey of drinking water
supply in Estonia from the point of view of public health. In:
Mander U, Brebbia CA, Tiezzi E (eds) The Sustainable City IV.
Urban Regeneration and Sustainability. WIT Press, Southamp-
ton, pp 817–826
Indermitte E, Saava A, Russak S, Kull A (2007) The contribution of
drinking water fluoride to the risk of dental fluorosis in Estonia.
In: Brebbia C (ed) Environmental Health Risk IV. WIT Press,
Southampton, pp 161–170
Joogivee kvaliteedi-ja kontrollinouded ning analuusimeetodid (2001)
(The quality and monitoring requirements for drinking water and
methods of analysis), RTL 2001/100/1369 (in Estonian)
Jurgenson E (1988) Deposition of the Silurian Beds in the Baltic.
Valgus, Tallinn (in Russian)
Kaljo D, Kiipli T, Martma T (1997) Carbon Isotope event markers
through the Wenlock-Pridoli sequence at Ohesaare (Estonia) and
Priekule (Latvia). Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol
132:211–224
Karro E, Rosentau A (2005) Fluoride levels in the Silurian–
Ordovician aquifer system of western Estonia. Fluoride
38:307–311
Karro E, Uppin M (2010) Siluri-ordoviitsiumi veeladestu fluoriidide
ja boori geoloogilised allikad (Fluoride and boron in Silurian–
Ordovician aquifer system). Keskkonnatehnika 3:25–27 (in
Estonian)
Karro E, Indermitte E, Saava A, Haamer K, Marandi A (2006)
Fluoride occurrence in publicly supplied drinking water in
Estonia. Environ Geol 50:389–396
Karro E, Marandi A, Vaikmae R, Uppin M (2009) Chemical
peculiarities of the Silurian–Ordovician and Cambrian-Vendian
aquifer systems in Estonia: an overview of hydrochemical
studies. Est J Earth Sci 58:342–352
Kiipli E, Kiipli T (2006) Carbonate distribution in the East Baltic
deep shelf in the late Ordovician-early Silurian. GFF
128:147–152
Kiipli T, Mannik P, Batchelor RA, Kiipli E, Kallaste T, Perens H
(2001) Correlation of Telychian (Silurian) altered volcanic ash
beds in Estonia, Sweden, and Norway. Norw J Geol 81:179–193
Kiipli T, Kiipli E, Kallaste T, Hints R, Somelar P, Kirsimae K (2007)
Altered volcanic ash as an indicator of marine environment,
reflecting pH and sedimentation rate—Example from the
Ordovician-Kinnekulle bed of Baltoscandia. Clay Clay Min
55:177–188
Kiipli T, Soesoo A, Kallaste T, Kiipli E (2008) Geochemistry of
Telichian (Silurian) K-bentonites in Estonia and Latvia. J Volc-
anol Geoth Res 171:45–58
Kundu N, Panigrahi MK, Tripathy S, Munshi S, Powell MA, Hart BR
(2001) Geochemical appraisal of fluoride contamination ofgroundwater in the Nayagarh District of Orissa, India. Environ
Geol 41:451–460
Leybourne MI, Peter JM, Johannesson KH, Boyle DR (2008) The
Lake Saint-Martin bolide has a big impact on groundwater
fluoride concentrations. Geology 36:115–118
Mather JD, Porteous NC (2001) The Geochemistry of boron and its
isotopes in groundwaters from marine and non-marine sandstone
aquifers. Appl Geochem 16:821–834
Naseem S, Rafique T, Bashir E, Bhanger MI, Laghari A, Usmani TH
(2010) Lithological influences on occurrence of high-fluoride
groundwater in Nagar Parkar area, Thar Desert, Pakistan.
Chemosphere 78:1313–1321
Nestor H, Einasto R (1997) Ordovician and Silurian carbonate
sedimentation basin. In: Raukas A, Teedumae A (eds) Geology
and mineral resources of Estonia. Estonian Academy Publishers,
Tallinn, pp 192–204
Pennisi M, Bianchini G, Muti A, Kloppmann W, Gonfiantini R (2006)
Behaviour of boron and strontium isotopes in groundwater–
aquifer interactions in Cornia Plain (Tuscany, Italy). Appl
Geochem 21:1169–1183
Perens R, Vallner L (1997) Water-bearing formation. In: Raukas A,
Teedumae A (eds) Geology and mineral resources of Estonia.
Estonian Academy Publishers, Tallinn, pp 137–145
Perens R, Savva V, Lelgus M, Parm T (2001) The Hydrogeochemical
Atlas of Estonia (CD version). Geological Survey of Estonia,
Tallinn
Polma L (1982) Comparative lithology of the Ordovician Carbonate
Rocks in the Northern and Middle East Baltic. Valgus, Tallinn
(in Russian)
Price CJ, Marr MC, Myeos CB, Seely JC, Heindel JJ, Schwetz BA
(1996) The developmental toxicity of boric acid in rabbits.
Fundam Appl Toxicol 34:176–187
Queste A, Lacombe M, Hellmeier W, Hillermann F, Bortulussi B,
Kaup M, Ott K, Mathys W (2001) High concentrations of
fluoride and boron in drinking water wells in the Muenster
Environ Earth Sci (2012) 65:1147–1156 1155
123
region: results of a preliminary investigation. Int J Hyg Environ
Health 203:221–224
Rafique T, Naseem S, Bhanger MI, Usmani TH (2008) Fluoride ion
contamination in the groundwater of Mithi sub-district, the Thar
Desert, Pakistan. Environ Geol 56:317–326
Raukas A, Teedumae A (1997) Geology and mineral resources of
Estonia. Estonian Academy Publishers, Tallinn
Reddy DV, Nagabhushanam P, Sukhija BS, Reddy AGS, Smedley PL
(2010) Fluoride dynamics in the granitic aquifer of the Wailapally
watershed, Nalonga District, India. Chem Geol 269:278–289
Saava A (1998) Health hazards due to drinking water. Proc Latvian
Acad Sci 52:162–167
Saxena VK, Ahmed S (2003) Inferring the chemical parameters for the
dissolution of fluoride in groundwater. Environ Geol 43:731–736
Somelar P, Kirsimae K, Hints R, Kirs J (2010) Illitization of Early
Paleozoic K-bentonites in the Baltic Basin: decoupling of burial-
and fluid-driven processes. Clay Clay Min 58:388–398
Sujatha D (2003) Fluoride levels in the groundwater of the south-
eastern part of Ranga Reddy district, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Environ Geol 44:587–591
Vingisaar P, Oraspold A, Einasto E, Jurgenson E (1965) Karbonaatk-
ivimite uhtne klassifikatsioon ja legend (Classification of
carbonate rocks). Eesti NSV Teaduste Akadeemia, Tallinn (in
Estonian)
Wegman DH, Eisen EA, Hu X, Woskie SR, Smith RS, Garabrandt D
(1994) Acute and chronic respiratory effects of sodium borate
particulate exposures. Environ Health Perspect 102:119–128
WHO (1998) Environmental Health Criteria 204: Boron. World
Health Organization, Geneva
WHO (2008) Guidelines for drinking-water quality, 3rd edn. World
Health Organization, Geneva
Yazbeck C, Kloppmann W, Cottier R, Sahuquillo J, Debotte G, Huel
G (2005) Health impact evaluation of boron in drinking water: a
geographical risk assessment in Northern France. Environ
Geochem Health 27:419–427
Zohouri FV, Rugg-Gunn AJ (2000) Sources of dietary fluoride intake
in 4-year-old children residing in low, medium and high fluoride
areas in Iran. Int J Food Sci Nutr 51:317–326
1156 Environ Earth Sci (2012) 65:1147–1156
123