Upload
queensu
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension forFirefox. Never miss a story with this clean and simple appthat delivers the latest headlines to you.
LIVELIVE
News USA UK Russian politics Business Op-Edge In vision In motion Shows Bulletin board More
13:18 GMT, Jan 17, 2015
Where to watchWhere to watch ScheduleSchedule
Tags
Animals, Australia, Biology,
Ecology, Global warming,
Health, Science, USA
Home / News /
Mass extinction for Earth’s oceansprobable, comprehensive study says
The first comprehensive study of its kind
has determined that ocean life is facing
mass extinction from human activity. But
the record damage is still reversible –
unlike our impact on land. American scientists say the effects can
be mitigated.
We’ve known for a while that achieving sustainability would be
impossible with our lifestyles. Although the majority of Earth is
Published time: January 17, 2015 10:19
Reuters / Jorge Silva
Freevideo ИНОТВ RTД RUPTLY
Applications RSS
ESP РУС DE العربية
Get short URL
covered in water we are vastly reliant on, many of our practicesare causing unprecedented damage to marine biology: coral reefdamage, resource mining, fish farming, construction work,chemical pollution, the depletion of bio resources, unintendedspecies migration, global warming, military drills – to name just afew.
The picture has just been made clearer by a study that for thefirst time ever brought all these strands together. Drs. Malin L.Pinsky, Stephen R. Palumbi, Douglas J. McCauley and colleaguesfrom the University of California have dug into hundreds ofsources past and present, including the fossil record andstatistics on shipping and seabed mining to form the chillingconclusions of their study, published Thursday in the journalScience.
“We may be sitting on a precipice of a major extinction event,”McCauley says on the analysis, which has already received wideacclaim from marine biologists and experts in related fields.
READ MORE: First time in 2 mn years, melting Arctic ice threatensmass-scale species contamination
“If by the end of the century we’re not off the business-as-usualcurve we are now, I honestly feel there’s not much hope for normalecosystems in the ocean,” Palumbi said.
READ MORE: Melting of Antarctic ice sheet and 3-meter sea level
Coral eating starfish at Australia's Great Barrier Reef (AFP Photo /Katharina Fabricius / Australian Institute of Marine Science)
rise inevitable - study
One of the key conclusions is that the oceans had until now
largely evaded the damage we had caused to terrestrial life,
seeing as we’re after all a terrestrial species. But after 1800, when
industrialization hit, land extinction sped up and the stage was
set for irreversible water damage, which is now mirroring the
situation.
“Current trends in ocean use suggest that habitat destruction is likelyto become an increasingly dominant threat to ocean wildlife overthe next 150 years,” the team said in their study. And because
oceans are a fluid mechanism, and much more difficult to
monitor accurately than land, there is practically no way of
reaching a conclusion on the average state of Earth’s water. Some
places could be far wars off than others, hence the importance of
the new cumulative analysis.
READ MORE: Big US banks balk at funding Great Barrier Reef coal
port
READ MORE: Danger to food chain? Microplastic contaminates
found in Sydney Harbor
We’re squeezing the species on all sides: mangrove farming
destroys habitats, while our fish nets have affected 20 million
Reuters / Sergio Moraes
square miles of ocean already, altering the continental shelf.
Seabed mining contracts are an especially huge change: the area
went from zero square miles in the year 2000 to a staggering
460,000 in 2014. This serious threat is especially dangerous to
sensitive and unique ecosystems.
And while we no longer hunt whales to the same extent, their
lives are now affected by a rapidly growing number of shipping
lanes.
READ MORE: US Navy to kill, injure ‘thousands’ of whales,
dolphins during drills – activists
The process is also a chain. The human footprint has caused a 40
percent decline in coral reefs worldwide, which consequently
leads to habitat destruction for marine species. Some migration
may result in the arrival of predatory species to ecosystems that
are not prepared to accept them, and so on. But everyone is
feeling the impact.
“If you cranked up the aquarium heater and dumped some acid inthe water, your fish would not be very happy,” Pinsky said. “In effect,that’s what we’re doing to the oceans.”
And it starts on land for many marine animals: some lay eggs –
like sea turtles; seabirds nest in cliffs, and so on. Some have
already become extinct due to our land activity.
READ MORE: Nicaragua starts work on $50bn canal between two
oceans
Photo by Phil's 1stPix / flickr.com
“But in the meantime, we do have a chance to do what we can. Wehave a couple decades more than we thought we had, so let’s pleasenot waste it,” Palumbi said. "I fervently believe that our best partnerin saving the ocean is the ocean itself.”
READ MORE: BP caps cash pipeline to research worst oil spill in
US history
McCauley elaborates that if we limit the industrialization of
Earth’s water, we could facilitate species recovery – much more so
than we ever could on land, where the damage is now irreversible
in places.
“There are a lot of tools we can use,” he said. The team believes
that designing an approach with climate change in mind would
be the way to go. It’s about considering how and where species
can escape rising temperatures and a lowering of pH levels. As
we learn that some areas are indeed affected more gravely than
others, one of the approaches may be to limit industrial
operations to some areas, while allowing others to recover.
“It’s creating a hopscotch pattern up and down the coasts to helpthese species adapt,” Pinsky said.
33 comments
Login
0
Reply21 minutes ago
Devark Veyth
I love how the worst industrial disaster EVER (which is quite possibly an
ele) just continually flys under the radar... #Fukushima.. and it's not even
close to being contained.
-1
Reply29 minutes ago
felipecnichols
Mʏ ʟᴀsᴛ ᴘᴀʏ ᴄʜᴇᴄᴋ ᴡᴀs $8000 working 9 hours a week online. My younger
brother friend has been averaging 12k for months now and he works about
29 hours a week. I ᴄᴀɴᴛ ʙᴇʟɪᴇᴠᴇ ʜᴏᴡ ᴇᴀsʏ ɪᴛ ᴡᴀs ᴏɴᴄᴇ I ᴛʀɪᴇᴅ ɪᴛ ᴏᴜᴛ.
Tʜɪs ɪs ᴡʜᴀ I ᴅᴏ,......www.jobs700.com
0Brigitte Meier
The conservation efforts will all come to naught once the steel casings of
the poison gas and biological weapons' ammunition dumped into the sea
rust through and release the content. It will poison most of the sea. So
much radioactive and toxic waste has already been dumped into the sea
near the Somalia coast that the livelihood of the people as fishermen was
destroyed and they became pirates. People on land got sick from the
waste dumping. there are thousands of square miles of ocean covered with
plastic refuse. It will disintegrate into hydrocarbons and poison the oceans.
If mankind wants to save the oceans, it should not only reduce
industrialization of the ocean, stop all sonar and other military tests, but in
addition start to clean up the pollution wrought onto the oceans. Then the
fish and natural conditions can take over and regenerate the oceans. A
more likely scenario is however that mankind will in time die out due to
starvation as land is polluted with toxic chemicals and seas are polluted with
Applications RSS
News In vision
USA In motion
UK Shows
Russian politics Bulletin board
Business More
Op-Edge
Live
Where to watch
Schedule
Legal disclaimer
Privacy policy
Feedback
About us
Contact info
RT NEWS ENGLISH APPS
Android
iOS
Windows phone
Windows 8
العربية
Español
Русский
Deutsch
Freevideo
ИНОТВ
RTД
RUPTLY
Applications
RSS
Legal disclaimer
Privacy policy
Feedback
About us
Contact info
© Autonomous Nonprofit Organization “TV-Novosti”, 2005–2015. All rights reserved.