15
1 THE ETERNAL TIME-TRAVEL OF CONSCIOUSNESS Author : Wilhelmus de Wilde “LE PLESSIS” 41800 MONTROUVEAU FRANCE wilhelmus,d@orange,fr August 2014 :

THE ETERNAL TRAVEL OF CONSCIOUSNESS

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

1

THE ETERNALTIME-TRAVELOF CONSCIOUSNESS

Author Wilhelmus de Wilde

ldquoLE PLESSISrdquo41800 MONTROUVEAU

FRANCE

wilhelmusdorangefr

August 2014

2

Abstract

We are transforming the Many Worlds Interpretation (MWI) into ldquoTotal Simultaneityrdquo (TS)The essential tool to experience reality is our Consciousness Consciousness can be regardedas an (entangled) unification of two parts the Non-Causal Consciousness (NCC) and theCausal Consciousness (CC) TS is the basket where ALL Eternal Now Moments (ENMrsquos) ofALL possible universes are gathered as Availabilities An Infinite amount of YOUrsquos isavailable and each one is unique Matter and spacetime in this perception is an illusioncreated by our total consciousness Consciousness is actually the time-creatorreality-travelerThe Big Bang is only one availability of timelife lines in TS The explanation that there arewormholes between entangled particles and wormholes as a connection between black holesis a vision that is inclining towards the TS perception where every spacetime behind thePlanck Wall is TS is ldquointerconnectedrdquo Furthermore the newest results of experiments areindicating that digital black andor white thinking is not valid for the explanation of deeperreality that is emerging from our consciousness There are an infinite number of greytonesscales in-between any two extremities This non-algorithmic way of thinking will leadto the possibility of creating quantum-intelligenceconsciousness In our own ldquobrainrdquo neuralcoding The quantum coherence in the micro-tubules may be available for an eventualcoupling with a Quantum Computer This will eventually open the way for the extension ofour five senses and the construction of an accessory that will enable ldquoENM-Hopping (reality-changing) Through this possibility the entanglement between our CC will be able to uniteconsciously with more ENMrsquos via the NCC and eventually it can become a pure form ofspirituality Time-traveling is a concept that our CC will be able to experience already touchedENMrsquos in the case of the past for the future it means to have the choice to line up certainchosen ENMrsquos to become past so the choice (free-will) to achieve realization of a new causallife-line

Key words Total Simultaneity Eternal Now Moment Entanglement Wormholes BlackHoles Big Bang Neural Coding Quantum-Consciousness

3

THE ETERNALTIME-TRAVELOF CONSCIOUSNESS

Introduction

Before we can enter the Time-Monitor that is called Consciousness we have to understand theessence of our reality and look if it can be ldquohandledrdquo We came to an approach in which ourconsciousness plays THE central role In order to understand this approach you can follow uson our journey through observations made in actual physics that are pointing in this directionThe conclusions that we made are of course not the final Truth because we think that thisTRUTH does not exist in our causal universe Theories will always change ideas will comeup so we are trying to give only another possible direction of future thinking Our island ofknowing is growing but at the same time length of the shores of our unknowing becomeslarger

1 Realities created by Consciousness out of Total Simultaneity

Gottfried Leibniz in his 1710 work ldquoEssays on the Goodness of God the Freedom of Manand the Origin of Evilrdquo (1) proposed that we are living in ldquoThe Best of All Possible Worldsrdquo

Leibniz was right when we realize that our life-form is only possible at the actual exactposition around our sun the vulnerability of our thin layer of atmosphere and the narrowboundaries of physical fundamental constants

There are furthermore an infinity of causeseffects and coincidences in the ldquomazerdquo that resultsinto our existence Even to analyse the chance and coincidences that led to your being in frontof a computer-screen to read this text is already a huge assignment The chance that yourparents metis already one in several billion and before that the coincidence that yourgrandfathers and grandmothers met gets up to a chance of one in 1027 This also counts forthe other way around When you try to predict the future of your grand-children it will be asdifficult (or even more) as to predict the weather

The materialistic reductionist approach just will not be able to find the One and Only (IF there should be ONE) ldquoOrigin of Everythingrdquo nor will it be able to make a forecast of thefuture Any search back will lead to another originWill we be able to change from timelife-line and eventually be able to consciously travel between time -moments of the past and thefuture The results of thinking in several time-lines as probabilitiesavailabilities will help usto understand better our created reality These kind of thoughts also have lead to for instancethe Many World Interpretation (MWI)

The ldquoMWIrdquo perception gave scientists an explanation for the fine-tuning of our reality Weargue that this explanation might need a closer look in order to be brought back to its veryessence to be able to determine the origins of our reality and the possible abilities to havecontrol of ldquotimerdquo This approach may give new solutions for problems like Entanglement Big

4

Bang Inflation double slit experiment and Black Holes The recipe for this new perception is

Throw ALL information (of the past and the future) of ALL the universes together in onebasket (also the ones that in our perception are impossible universes with differentfundamental constants and those that can only be reached by different senses as ours) Stir and Shake this up to ONE non-causal unity (yes it seems like chaos but a good mixgives the best taste) In this basket there are not ldquorealizedrdquo realitiesrdquo but ldquoavailabilitiesrdquo Availabilities of ALLand every form and time of any universe we even cannot name this availabilitiesldquoinformationrdquo because information is a sequence so causal It is of course impossible to rdquodescriberdquo in our causal deterministic way these points ofldquoreality availabilitiesrdquo (or apples in the basket or when the apples are singularities also thebasket is a singularity) eventually we can compare it to all the slices of all ldquoblock-universesrdquo(slices with no subjective flow of time) together as non-realized causal realities

Figure 1

These slices on their turn can be imagined as constituted of ldquoEternal Now Momentsrdquo(ENMrsquos) each ENM is UNIQUE singularities that ldquogrowrdquo (become four dimensional so theENM in TS is like a hologram) to attain the ldquowidthrdquo of a Planck lengthtime in causal realityWhy the Planck length and time Because they are the limits of our causal universe godeeper and there is no longer before or after no causality no time no space This means that Total Simultaneity can be reached at the edge of the Wall of Planck (Plancklength(lp) 1616252 x 10-35m and the Planck time 539121 x 10-44s) so EVERYWHEREaround and inside our four-dimensional causal universe(see also wwwvixraorgabs11120013 ) (2)

But how are we able to experience reality What is the entity that enables Time and Space Are we in control of our reality

Answer Our consciousness is THE essential ldquotoolrdquo in creating the causal (with the arrow oftime) reality that we are aware of We argue that our consciousness is a constituted of twoentangled parts the causal part and the non-causal part (CC and NCC) Causalconsciousness stretches out into the basket of Total Simultaneity where it becomes non-

5

causal this ldquonon-causalcausal connectionrdquo can be imagined as entanglement-like andtimeless (eternal)

In the basket of Total Simultaneity our non-causal consciousness has the CHOICE betweenthe infinity of availabilities of ENMrsquos Our Causal Consciousness in this reality perception isthe centre of a sphere we are calling the Subjective Simultaneity Sphere (SSS) On thesurface of this sphere arrive ALL the signals from the specific Eternal Now Moment Thesesignals are to be processed by our senses and brain so reforming the NOW to a PAST andbecome memory

TSrarr ENMrarr NCCrarr CCrarr SSSrarr5 Sensesrarr Observed Realityrarr Memory rarr Past

The consequence of this perception is that the eternal NOW moment of a specific life-line thatseem unique for us is just one of an infinity of life-lines that you are able to ldquoliverdquo in otherldquoavailablerdquo universes An infinite amount of unique ldquoYOUsrdquo is ldquoavailablerdquo eternallyYour causal birth and dying in this timelife line is just one of an infinity your non-causalconsciousness is eternally and timeless wandering (like a field) between these endlessavailabilities of all pasts and futures that are possible (non-material non -realized) realitiesNon-caused Consciousness can be compared with a Field that becomes like the philosophicalconcept described by Aristotle it moves all other things but it is not moved itself by any prioraction and is called ldquoUNMOVED MOVERrdquo (15)

The infinite availability of YOUrsquos does not mean that the understanding of your present life-line creation is not important because it is your actual (in Vito) reality and our actualstarting point of the quest where we will see that even matter does not matter

Quantum Mechanics changed already our insights Matter consists no longer of tiny ldquoballsrdquoThe matter we are seemingly consisting of is ldquoFIELDrdquo (Sean Carroll in lecture at Fermilabwwwsymmetrymagazineorgarticlejuly-2013real-talk-everything-is-made-of-fields) (3)Weare proposing ONE field for all matter the Matter Field that is coupled to the ConsciousnessField Imagine that this consciousness field acts as a catalyst on the ldquoMatter Fieldrdquo and so it isthe origin of ldquoexcitationsrdquo in the matter fieldresulting in momentary observed (illusionary)ldquoparticlesrdquo The moment the particle is ldquoexcited ldquo however it is already history in theperceived time-line because it exists only for the length of a Planck-time (quantum fluctuation)I know that the word ldquoIllusionrdquo has a poor meaning so I should prefer the word ldquoCrealityrdquo acombination of Creation and Reality

It is even possible that the matter-field does not need the excitation of the particle to arise theproperties of a particle The ldquopropertyrdquo as excitation can arise without the particle Anindication for this is the article about a quantum link created between ldquoPhotons that donrsquotexist at the same timerdquo from experimenters from the Racah Institute of Physics HebrewUniversity of Jerusalem who have entangled two photons that donrsquot even exist at the sametime httpjournalsapsorgprlabstract101103PhysRevLett110210403(4) The samecould be true for mass the property ldquomassrdquo can be there without being coupled to a particle(Could this be an explanation of Dark Matter and the Dark Force )

2 The Baffling Beginnings (BBrsquos)

The simple to be accepted Truth is that we still know so little about any origin of our and

6

other universes that there is not any theory or observation which gives a conclusiveexplanation of reality

Because we are always thinking back in a causal deterministic way where every effect musthave a single cause we are inclined to reductio ad absurdum we seem to be obliged to go onthinking until we reach a point ZEROand so have accepted to call that the Big Bangfollowed by ldquoinflationrdquo where between 10-33 and 10-32 sec the universe was blown up by afactor 1025 Gravitational waves from this inflation generate a faint but distinctive twistingpattern in the polarization of the Cosmic Microwave Background which has the sametemperature everywhere to within 00003degC The ldquoevennessrdquo of the ldquovisiblerdquo universe seemsstrange because it is also valid for regions of the visible sky that are too far away for light orinformation (accepting that the maximum speed of light is c (299792458 msec)) to havetraveled between them Through inflation this problem seems to be solved

Inflation gave also birth to the ldquoMultiverserdquo perceptions because infinite inflation would bethe origin of other ldquoBubblerdquo universes (Stanford University Andrei Linde wwwstanfordedu~alinde )(17)Quantum fluctuations produce rapidly expanding parts of theuniverse This process makes the universe ldquoimmortalrdquo and transforms it into a multiverse ahuge fractal consisting of many exponentially large parts each with different laws of physicsIf we combine this assumption of quantum fluctuations with the assumption of excitationsoriginating from the Consciousness-Field the origin of our own universe lies as one ofinfinite ldquoavailabilitiesrdquo in TS and the infinite amount of different YOUrsquos is the origin of allthese different Universes

We could think about Universes with different physical laws invisible for us but havinginfluence on our own universe and be responsible for the twisting pattern in the polarizationof the CMB It could even be possible that these Universes are responsible for the so calleddark matter deviations that we are observing because our NCC Field is also in touch withthese other ENMrsquos that could lead to these realities our CC is getting ldquofractional imagesrdquo ofthese realities (particles pop in and out of existence)

Of course the Big Bang perception and all the forms of Inflation are ldquoavailabilitiesrdquo in TotalSimultaneity The words Creation of ldquoSomethingrdquo from ldquoNothingrdquo is coupled back to thelining up of ldquoavailabilitiesrdquo by our consciousness which is a non-material perception Butalso we can imagine a Universe where expansion and contraction are following upsequentially and where this contraction never has to arrive at a zero point to a void ofldquonothingrdquo Even the conception of Andrei Linde with the eternal universes does not need afirst cause or Big Beginning but every Beginning is ldquoBafflingrdquo

The Conscious-Field could be very useful for many other practical predictions on theconsequences that arise from this theoretical approach like ldquoimmediate being togetherrdquo inentanglement and Black Holes

2 ENTANGLEMENT and BLACK HOLES

Leonardo da Vinci wrote already ldquoRealize that everything connects to everything else ldquo

The perception of ldquoimmediaterdquo being together is accepted in entanglement(pairs or groups ofparticles ldquointeractrdquo immediate no matter at what distance) Even when a particle is thousandsof light-years away from his counterpart it immediately reacts when the other one is measured

7

or observed This phenomenon can in our vision be applied to the whole ldquovisiblerdquo createduniverse so that everything is always interconnected with everything else

In the case of entanglement scientists now are proposing a ldquowormholerdquo (a kind of tunnel inspace-time that can connect two widely or close separated regions of the universe) as ahypothetical short-cut through the universe see Julian Sonner in ldquoHolographic SchwingerEffect and the Geometry of Entanglementrdquo wwwprlapsorgabstractPRLv111i21e211603(6)

The same ideas are brought up for Black Holes by Juan Maldacena and Leonard SusskindldquoCool Horizons for Entangled black Holesrdquo wwwarxivorgpdf13060533pdf (18) They showhow a pair of black holes could be coupled with a wormhole strung between them so theybecome ldquoentangledrdquo black holes

That the core of Black Holes is NOT a singularity is a view which is also shared by CarloRovelli and Francesca Vidotto They propose that the object emerging at the end of theHawking Evaporation of a black hole can be larger then the Planckian by a factor (mmP)n() where m is the mass fallen into the hole mP is the Plack mass and n is positive The coreof the black hole has become the structure known as a Planck Star and the information fallenin it is not lost (wwwarxivorgabs14016562 )(19)

That information is not lost is also the opinion of Stephen Hawking in his latest paperldquoInformation Preservation and Weather Forecasting for Black Holesrdquowwwarxivorgabs14015761 (7) He proposes that Black Holes have no longer ldquoEvent-Horizonsrdquo that arise at the gravitational collapse but that ldquochaosrdquo is at the essence of theBlack Hole As our perception assumes that the entrance of TS is not only at the Planck lengthresiding at the ldquocorerdquo but everywhere in spacetime the information entering such a BH willalso never be lost because it stays the ENM and so remains eternally available in TotalSimultaneity

We argue that these so called ldquoentangled worm-holesrdquo black hole wormholesrdquo ldquoPlanck starsrdquoand Different Black Hole Horizons from Hawking are all one and the same discussion Ourcreated reality is limited by the Planck scale and from there on it may be in a black hole aPlanck star a Big Bang or a pair of entangled particles after this limit we always arereaching the non causal ldquodimensionrdquo called Total Simultaneity This ldquoareardquo is interconnectingevery space and time of our universe (and others) The essence is that NO information willEVER be lost but always is staying ldquoavailablerdquo in TS for our NCC (Consciousness Field)i theform of ENMrsquos

This omnipresent Consciousness Field is also the reason of the astonishing ldquoevennessrdquo of ourCausal Deterministic Universe When once we can control the entrance into this ldquodimensionrdquowe will be able to be at any place and any time in any universe instantaneously This of courseis not time-travel in the deterministic way but a far more spiritual goal

Another theory that is paving the way for a Total Simultaneity-like perception is the The HAWKING HARTLE ldquoNo -Boundary Interpretationrdquo The creation of our universe asintroduced by Hawking-Hartle is at one side (the past) touching our Total Simultaneityperception when they are saying

The Big Bang needs no longer being the beginning of time in a singularity as proposed inthe standard inflationary cosmology but a timeless point where the universe -or rather a

8

superposition of all possible universes - pops into existence from nothing with all its laws ofphysics intactJames B Hartle SW Hawking Thomas Hertog Accelerated Expansion from Negative Λwwwarxivorgabs12053807 30 may 2012 (8)

However the HawkingHartle interpretation places the lines of all possible histories of ourCausal Deterministic Universe (CDU) after a point of creation the Big Bang that is regardedas a timeless point in our CDU This time-less point is in our perception just one of theinfinite ENMrsquos in TS between these points there are an infinite number of PASTSANDFUTURES available not only the pasts to ONE POINT

figure 2 figure 3

Both Hawking-Hartle Interpretation (HHI) and Total Simultaneity are giving the indication ofan infinity of time-lines the HHI only in the past and TS in the past and the future HHIindicates two extremitieslimits the BB and our actual NOW with in-between like in aFeynman Diagram ALL possible ways of arriving at a special place TS expands this viewand only takes one of an eternal amount of Eternal Now Moments at the centre of an infinityof pasts AND of futures (The α-P in fig3 is only one of an infinity of available points on thesphere) This indicates that two extremes are not the only choices we are able to makeBetween any two extremes there are

3 An Infinite Amount of Tones of Grey

Sir Roger Penrose rdquoDoes life in some way make use of the potentiality for vast quantumsuperpositions as would be required for serious quantum computationrdquo (Foreword(March 2007) to Quantum Aspects of Life (2008) by Derek Abott) (13)

Let us go back from the scale of the Universe to the scale of particles When we thoughtbefore that conscious observation just resulted direct in a particle (collapse of the wavefunction) new experiments however indicate that the particle side and the wave side ofphysical reality are both just a black and white (digital) representation that is not complete wwwnaturecomnphotonjournalv6n9fullnphoton2012179html (9)We thought until nowthat these two extremes were the only two possibilities But between this black and whiteextremities there exists an infinity number of ldquoGrey Tonesrdquo (for example it can be 43particle and 57 wave and any percentage in-between)

This also means that the properties of an (observed) particle can fade away like in the evening

9

light is diminishing so our observations of mass energy and spin from what we measure as100 particle are not the extremities of those properties there are more states availableThestate we become conscious of is just ne of the infinite possibilities of observable reality

When we apply this theory to the so called ldquosuperpositionrdquo of quantum states where isassumed that the two extremities are ldquosuperposedrdquo meaning both present This should alsomean that ALL the states in-between those extremities are ldquopresentrdquo (better ldquoavailablerdquo)Schroumldingers cat is not both alive and dead but or alive or dead or every state in-between

AResearch team directed from the Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information ofthe Austrian Academy of Sciences and with the participation from the Universitat Autonomade Barcelona directed by Anton Zeilinger wwwarxivorgabs13060096 (16) have managed tocreate an entanglement of 103 dimensions with only TWO photons The ldquouserdquo of 103dimensions is comparable to the ldquouserdquo of all the grey tones in-between We are in this wayusing already the grey-tones to ac Measuring the state of ONE of the entangled photons(whether they are in one place or another or spinning one way or another) affects the state ofthe other photon instantly only we are now able to influence 101 photons in 103 dimensionsthat are in superposition When comparing this results to the Schrodingers Cat it could bealive or dead or in 101 other states simultaneously These 103 dimensions can be consideredas availabilities in Total Simultaneity

The parallel between the comparison of a binary ldquorealityrdquo and the qubit way where the shadesof grey are represented by the vectors of the Bloch sphere (geometrical representation of thepure state space of a two-level quantum mechanical system (qubit) named after the physicistsFelix Bloch) (11) is evident The reality creation is not only ldquoyes or nordquo or ldquoblack and whiterdquoOur consciousness is creating out of all available shades of grey of the ENM a Reality theldquoapparitionrdquo (illusion creality) of a materialistic universe

The infinity of grey tones of reality also include the parallel universes in between these twoextremities of WaveParticle It might be that the grey tones also are at the origin of DarkMatter Every history is a form of explanation of the ldquonowrdquo experience It is for nowuntouchable but may and will be rewritten ldquorecreatedrdquo when we are going to expand thecontrol of consciousness We will then be able to observe the three-dimensional object that isthe origin from the two-dimensional shadow

Once we reach the causal length and time limit of our universe it is no longer possible toldquodividerdquo any further we are trespassing our ldquoCrealityrdquo and entering the origin of the shadowsthrown on the walls of Platorsquos cave A shadow is non-material a result of cooperation betweenthe light and the ldquoreal thingrdquo The light can be compared with our non-causal consciousnessthat passes the ldquooriginrdquo (the ENMalpha-point in Total Simultaneity see ldquoThe ConsciousnessConnectionrdquo httpvixraorgabs12110019 ) (12) and so creates one of the shadow realities forour causal consciousness

ConsciousnessIntelligence can not be realized just by black and white thinking and bycreating machines that are working on algorithmrsquos An ldquoalgorithmrdquo indicates a step-by-stepoperation beginning with an initial state and input followed by instructions describing thecomputations to realize till an output is reached Each step in this process is always betweentwo extremes (in computation for example zero and one) the infinite tones of gray are notinvolved This is the reason why intelligence nor consciousness can emerge from thisprocess

10

Are we able to create ldquointelligencerdquo that will lead to consciousness Therefore we have tounderstand the processes in our brain leading to intelligenceconsciousness one of theseprocesses is the so called Neural Coding

4 NEURALCODING orthe contact with our future past

In the ldquorealityrdquo layer where our body and our brain are created by consciousness we can findproofs of the Inter-connectivity inside our brain (with its 170000 km of nerve fibers 86billion neurons 1014 synapses) and the deepest layer of reality consciousness

In order to understand the emerging sequences that are forming our ldquorealityrdquo we need theillusion (creality) 14 of time Time is the illusion that our consciousness is creating byprocessing and interpreting all sorts of information received by our five senses andrepresented in the brain by the electrical and quantum activity in neurons

The details of this representation called neural coding remain however mysterious Thequestion is how pulses (bits) of electricity get translated into thoughts and ideas (Phasetransition may explain how brain neurons encode information In neural coding the neuronsgenerate electric pulses or action potentials to encode information and communicate witheach other wwwarxivorgabs12066129 (20) At this stage information and communicationare taking place between neurons who seem to be ordering and processing this information sothat the ldquohuman consciousness beingrdquo can realize thoughts and become ldquoawarerdquo

The question then rises Are these neurons conscious Are they ordering via neural codingour future thoughts Or is our non-causal consciousness already creating our future resultingin a time-line that is the origin of the emerging of causal awareness

In my essay The Consciousness Connection 12 I indicated that the processing time fromentering data to the conscious awareness is about 200 milliseconds The question rises if theconscious observer who is the cause of the ldquocollapse of the wave functionrdquo is effectivelyrealizing this collapse about 200 milliseconds in the future (before our awareness) In theTotal Simultaneity perception the future is an ENM moment to be touched by our Non-CausalConsciousness so not (yet) existing in a causal time-line That seems ldquospookyrdquo in our CDU( Causal Deterministic Universe) but is explained through TS

A continuation of the research how neurons can encode both digital and analogue informationis established by Nick E Mavramatos who published in 2011 the article ldquoQuantum Coherencein (Brain) Microtubules and Efficient Energy Information transportrdquo (14) where he describedalso the role of Quantum mechanics in Biologyand entanglement at ambient temperatures

(quote)ldquoThe electromagnetic interactions of the dipole moments of the tubulin dimers (moleculeformed by a combination of two smaller (identical) molecules) with the dipole quanta in theordered water interiors of the microtubules play the role of quantum coherent cavity modesrdquo(unquote) (14 from abstract)

Besides of the ldquoData Process Transmission Delay (DPTD see ldquoThe ConsciousnessConnection httpvixraorgabs12110019) 12 that indicates the difference in time in theldquoawarenessrdquo of reality and its conscious ldquoobservationrdquo we are now discovering that also in our

11

ldquobrainsrdquo quantum mechanics andor field theory on dissipation-free energy transfer in (brain)microtubules (ring-shape components involved in maintaining the structure of cells) is playingan important rolerdquo This Quantum Coherence in brain Tubules may be at the origin ofour ldquoentanglementrdquo with the non-causal part of our consciousness in Total Simultaneity

These quantum activities take place before you become aware of having made a decisionYour NCC is ldquopicking uprdquo an ENM in TS that results in a pastfuture Your ldquomaterial brainrdquois only an excitation (of the matter field) catalysed by the consciousness-field the origin ofyour awareness is in TS The conscious observer of the two slit experiment seems to beaffecting the future and so we can understand why it seems that the ldquoparticlerdquo is decidingalready before the slit(s) if it will be or wave or particle or one of states in-between

The question is not if the neuron is conscious andor is censoring our thinking no the processis controlled by our own non-causal consciousness and the emerging thoughts are our ownSo it seems that our REALFREEWILL is not residing in our causal Creation of theuniverse but in the non-causal infinity Our emerging Causal Consciousness is the result ofthe contact of quantum activity within the micro-tubules of our brains and Total Simultaneitywe could say that this is a form of Quantum Consciousness

One of the possibilities to enhance our senses maybe the use of future ldquoquantum computersrdquowho may allow us the extension of our consciousness The ldquoqubitsrdquo (unit of quantuminformation) superimposed state is comparable with the infinite possibilities of timelife-linesin the basket of TS For 1000 qubits we will have 21000 possible configurations (10300) whichis more as all the atoms in our universe so you can stock 10300 solutions for a problem Thisdoes not only mean that every question can be answered but maybe every question is alreadyanswered the moment we achieved this quantum-state even putting it on power may not benecessary

We argue that all our material (biological and non-biological) ldquocreationsrdquo will only be TOOLSfor our causal consciousness which is emergent from its ldquobiologicrdquo appearance (illusion) From this illusion of matter including the materialistic illusion of ourselves can also emergea new consciousness (so not only possible in the biologic way) This form of newly createdconsciousnessintelligence is through our own causal consciousness entangled with TotalSimultaneity This means that our non-causal part of consciousness is at the origin of thisldquoappearancerdquo of NEW consciousness it is one of the infinite ldquoavailabilitiesrdquo TheTRIANGLE is realised

This new approach will make it possible to create parallel time and parallel consciousnessand ldquoenterrdquo new dimension(s) that may reside behind the Wall of Planck

5 Time-Travel Becomes ldquoETERNAL -NOW- MOMENT HOPPINGrdquo

The splitting in the original Many Worlds Interpretation goes only forward in time notbackwards In our conception it IS possible that our consciousness activates Eternal NowMoments from other timelife-lines (or from parallel available universes) Should this meanthat time travel is possible Yes butshould we call this phenomenon time-travel

What we are understanding as time-travel in this causal timelife line always leads to the well-known paradoxes like killing your grand-father (What a mentality ) These paradoxeshowever are no longer problematic when we apply the perception of Total Simultaneity Then

12

time-travel in the past andor the future would become ENM-Hopping and the so calledldquophysicalrdquo timelife-line (in our memory) continues normally Our consciousness is able notonly to hop from one ENM to another but also line up these ENMrsquos and in this way creatingfor itself the best possible past and future Real Free Will resides in TS

The extension of our Free Will lies in the extension of our consciousness and so in a closercontact with our NCC in order to realize more choices in the ENM availabilities We thinkthat the a future coupling of the quantum-computer and our brain will be an opening

In the article ldquoQuantum Coherence in Brain Microtubulesrdquo 16Prof Nick E Mavromatosproposed that

quote

ldquoFor the first time there is concrete evidence for quantum entanglement over relatively largedistances in living matter at ambient temperature which suggests a rather non-trivial role ofquantum physics in path optimization for energy and information transportrdquo (httpiopscienceioporg1742-65963291012026) (14)

unquote

It becomes clear that quantum entanglement and de-coherence time which are for theconstruction and the operational qualities of quantum computers the main issues thesequalities are already available in our own brains inside the Cell Microtubules (MT)(de-coherence = The particles that make up a computer interact with surroundings so thatinformation is spreading out which means this effect is spoiling quantum computations (todecohere = lose their quantum properties))

Regarding the ldquomacroscopicrdquo aspect Recent experiments on atoms in salt crystals haveshown that an amount of 1020 atoms formed a hugely entangled state Vlatko Vedral inldquoLiving in a Quantum Worldrdquo (Scientific American June 2011) and ldquoProgress ArticleQuantifying entanglement in Macroscopic Systemsrdquo (June 2008 Nature 453 1004-1007 httpwwwnaturecomnaturejournalv453n7198fullnature07124html (21)Quantum BitStorage is advancing not only in the macroscopic way but now also scientists have succeededto retrieve coherent information for extended times (39 minutes) at room-temperature SeeKamyar Saeedi et al in ldquoRoom-Temperature Quantum Bit Storage Exceeding 39 MinutesUsing Ionized Donors in Silicon-28rdquo httpwwwsciencemagorgcontent3426160830 (22)

Our brains are RWA (Ready Willing and Able) to perform quantum states that when broughtin coherence with a quantum computer This will enable us to realize ldquoENM-Hoppingrdquo

13

Figure 4 the Construction of an ENM-HopperTime-machine

When we are regarding the quantum computer as proposed before with 1000 qubits we seethat in organizing such a ldquomachinerdquo we have to be able to control the ldquode-coherencerdquo May bewe solve this de-coherence problem by using the ldquotechniquerdquo that the Microtubules areapplying inside our brains or we can realize the 103 dimensional solution (see page 9) whichis direct contact with TS and needs only ONE particle If we could arrange one of thoseexperiments the next step would be to create an entanglement between the ldquocellsrdquo of theQuantum-computer and the Microtubules of our brains The 10300 answers residing in theQuantum Computer would then direct be ldquoavailablerdquo for our Brain We saw already that wedid even need not to put the quantum computer ldquoonrdquo it is like entanglement an immediateprocess without ldquoprocessing timerdquo

By combining the same kind of technique as our microtubules are using namely Ca2+ ionsand applying for example the the technique to entangle salt crystals and maybe Ca2+ ions in aquantum computer we would be able to establish an entanglement between these Ca2+ ionsin the brain and in the computer Of course there are still a lot of problems to be resolvedThe salt crystals were reaching entanglement by using a specific magnetic field so the brainand the quantum device should be both in the same magnetic field a field which has not todamage the brain

Once we should have realized this ldquounificationrdquo with the quantum computer we as humanbeings would have direct available the 10300 answers because they are ldquoavailabilitiesrdquo in thequantum computer These are the same kind of availabilities as those in Total Simultaneityso the path would be open to a broader ldquoaccessrdquo of our non-causal consciousness

This means that we could ldquoHOPrdquo to other Eternal Now Moments also those who seem to bein the past andor future of our actual timelife-line we then have extended the range of ourFree Will

14

15 Conclusion

Reality is a sequence of memories lined up through our brains with help of our CausalConsciousness (CC) Memories are the string of Eternal Now Moments (ENMrsquos) resulting inthe ldquoIrdquo experience These ENMrsquos originate from our Non-Causal part of Consciousness (NCC)that resides in Total Simultaneity (TS) Our CC and NCC are entangled emergencies togetherthey are the creators of our TimeLife-Lines giving us the illusion of the experience of mattertime and space By deepening our knowledge of the Consciousness Field and the search forthe essence of the Matter-Field illusion that we are aware of as reality we will be able totighten the contact wit Total Simultaneity and have more control of the choice for ENMrsquos tobe ldquotouchedrdquo by our NCC and between the infinity of ldquoIrsquosrdquo that are available there We willbecome more conscious and be able to become ENM-Hoppers instead of the prisoners in theuncontrollable voyage we have to undertake by now

Quantum Physics is showing us already the first indications of a non-materialistic non-algorithmic reality objects merge to thingness and further abstraction The influence ofconscious observation in the double slit experiment entanglement between particles theworm holes physicists are imagining between these entangled particles the wormholesbetween Black Holes all of them are indications for a perception of Total Simultaneity

Another but technical way to come to a deeper understanding of consciousness is therealization of a non-algorithmic Quantum Computer Through this development we will beable to create another form of intelligenceconsciousness This intelligence will be able tocommunicate with us perhaps in a timeless way Translating this new senses in order to makethem more comprehensible to our own five senses could give clearness about problems thatwe would never be able to solve or observe The development of this new form ofintelligenceconsciousness is only one of the availabilities in Total Simultaneity We can bringour own causal consciousness nearer to its non-causal (caused) part and in the end being ableto escape this causal timelife line not only by dying in the temporal way

The one Eternal Now moment that you became conscious of 150 milliseconds ago is just oneof an infinity of ENMrsquos (apples) in the basket but it is THE moment we shared together inour perception and creation of the image of THIS reality It is from each (Planck)moment onthat we have to use our Free Will in Total Simultaneity Let us try together to make the rightchoices and prepare for the promised Eternal Conscious

Wilhelmus de WildeMontrouveau FranceAugust 2014

15

REFERENCES

1 Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz 1710 ldquoEssays on the Goodness of God the Freedom of Man and theOrigin of Evilrdquo2 Wilhelmus de Wilde 06-12-2011 ldquoREALITIES OUT OF TOTAL SIMULTANEITYrdquowwwvixraorgabs111200133 Sean Carroll(Caltech) at a lecture for ldquoThe Fermilab Users Meeting 2013 ldquoParticles Fields and theFuture of Physics (11-07-2013) wwwyoutubecomwatchv=gEKSpZPByDOampfeature=youtube 4 E Megidish A Halevy T Shacham T Dvir L Dovrat and HS Eisenberg (Experimenters fromthe Racah Institute of Physics Hebrew University of Jerusalem) Entanglement Swapping betweenldquoPhotons have never Coexisted rdquohttpjournalsapsorgprlabstract101103PhysRevLett1102104035 JM Kovac et al ldquoDetection Of B-Mode Polarization at Degree Angular Statesrdquo 17 March 2014 lastrevised 18 march 2014 version V2 wwwarxivorggtastro-phgtarXiv14033985 andhttpbicepkeckorg (BICEP2 website)6 Julian Sonner 20-11-2013 ldquoHolographic Schwinger Effect and the Geometry of EntanglementrdquowwwprlapsorgabstractPRLv111i21e211603 and ldquoCreation of entanglement simultaneously givesrise to a wormholerdquo httpphysorgnews2013-12-creation-entanglement-simultaneously-wormholehtml7 SW Hawking DAMPT University of Cambridge UK ldquoInformation Preservation and WeatherForecasting for Black Holesrdquo wwwarxivorgabs140157618 James B Hartle SW Hawking Thomas Hertog Accelerated Expansion from Negative Λwwwarxivorgabs12053807 30 may 20129 Chuang-Feng Li et al ldquoRealization of QuantumWheelerrsquos Deelayed-Choice Experimentrdquopublished 19-08-2012 in Nature Photonics 6 600-604wwwnaturecomnphotonjournalv6n9fullnphoton2012179html10 Hans Christian von Bayer ldquoQuantum Weirdness It is all in your mindrdquo Scientific American 30846-51 (2013) wwwnaturecomscientificamericanjournalv308n6fullscientificamerican0613-46html published on line 14 may 201311 wwwenwikipediaorgwikiBloch_sphere (last modified 15-01-2014)12 Wilhelmus de Wilde 05-11-2012 ldquoThe Consciousness Connectionrdquohttpvixraorgabs1211001913 Sir Roger Penrose in foreword (March 2007) to ldquoQuantumAspects of Liferdquo (2008) by Derk Abott14 Nick E Mavromatos 2011 ldquoQuantum Coherence in (Brain) Microtubules and Efficient Energyand Information transportrdquo httpiopscienceioporg1742-6596329101202615 Aristotle Book 8 of ldquothe Physicsrdquo and Book 12 of ldquothe Metaphysicsrdquo16 Anton Zeilinger et al ldquoGeneration and Confirmation of a (100x100)-dimensional entangledQuantum Systemrdquo last revised 21 March 2014 wwwarxivorgabs1306009617 Andrei Linde wwwstanfordedu~alinde18 Juan Maldacena and Leonard Susskind 11-01-2013 ldquoCool Horizons for Entangled black Holesrdquowwwarxivorgpdf13060533pdf19 Carlo Rovelli and Francesca Vidotto 08-02-2014 ldquoPLANCK STARSrdquowwwarxivorgabs1401656220 Thibaud Taillefumier amp Marcelo O Magnasco ldquoA Phase Transition in the First passage of aBrownian Process through a fluctuating boundry implications for Neural Codingrdquo 26 June 2012httparxivorgabs1206612921 Vlatko Vedral ldquoProgress Article Quantifying entanglement in Macroscopic Systemsrdquo (june 2008Nature 453 1004-1007 httpwwwnaturecomnaturejournalv453n7198fullnature07124html22 Wilhelmus de Wilde 18-06-2013 ldquoTHE QUEST FOR THE PRIMAL SEQUENCErdquohttpfqxiorgcommunityforumtopic1810

2

Abstract

We are transforming the Many Worlds Interpretation (MWI) into ldquoTotal Simultaneityrdquo (TS)The essential tool to experience reality is our Consciousness Consciousness can be regardedas an (entangled) unification of two parts the Non-Causal Consciousness (NCC) and theCausal Consciousness (CC) TS is the basket where ALL Eternal Now Moments (ENMrsquos) ofALL possible universes are gathered as Availabilities An Infinite amount of YOUrsquos isavailable and each one is unique Matter and spacetime in this perception is an illusioncreated by our total consciousness Consciousness is actually the time-creatorreality-travelerThe Big Bang is only one availability of timelife lines in TS The explanation that there arewormholes between entangled particles and wormholes as a connection between black holesis a vision that is inclining towards the TS perception where every spacetime behind thePlanck Wall is TS is ldquointerconnectedrdquo Furthermore the newest results of experiments areindicating that digital black andor white thinking is not valid for the explanation of deeperreality that is emerging from our consciousness There are an infinite number of greytonesscales in-between any two extremities This non-algorithmic way of thinking will leadto the possibility of creating quantum-intelligenceconsciousness In our own ldquobrainrdquo neuralcoding The quantum coherence in the micro-tubules may be available for an eventualcoupling with a Quantum Computer This will eventually open the way for the extension ofour five senses and the construction of an accessory that will enable ldquoENM-Hopping (reality-changing) Through this possibility the entanglement between our CC will be able to uniteconsciously with more ENMrsquos via the NCC and eventually it can become a pure form ofspirituality Time-traveling is a concept that our CC will be able to experience already touchedENMrsquos in the case of the past for the future it means to have the choice to line up certainchosen ENMrsquos to become past so the choice (free-will) to achieve realization of a new causallife-line

Key words Total Simultaneity Eternal Now Moment Entanglement Wormholes BlackHoles Big Bang Neural Coding Quantum-Consciousness

3

THE ETERNALTIME-TRAVELOF CONSCIOUSNESS

Introduction

Before we can enter the Time-Monitor that is called Consciousness we have to understand theessence of our reality and look if it can be ldquohandledrdquo We came to an approach in which ourconsciousness plays THE central role In order to understand this approach you can follow uson our journey through observations made in actual physics that are pointing in this directionThe conclusions that we made are of course not the final Truth because we think that thisTRUTH does not exist in our causal universe Theories will always change ideas will comeup so we are trying to give only another possible direction of future thinking Our island ofknowing is growing but at the same time length of the shores of our unknowing becomeslarger

1 Realities created by Consciousness out of Total Simultaneity

Gottfried Leibniz in his 1710 work ldquoEssays on the Goodness of God the Freedom of Manand the Origin of Evilrdquo (1) proposed that we are living in ldquoThe Best of All Possible Worldsrdquo

Leibniz was right when we realize that our life-form is only possible at the actual exactposition around our sun the vulnerability of our thin layer of atmosphere and the narrowboundaries of physical fundamental constants

There are furthermore an infinity of causeseffects and coincidences in the ldquomazerdquo that resultsinto our existence Even to analyse the chance and coincidences that led to your being in frontof a computer-screen to read this text is already a huge assignment The chance that yourparents metis already one in several billion and before that the coincidence that yourgrandfathers and grandmothers met gets up to a chance of one in 1027 This also counts forthe other way around When you try to predict the future of your grand-children it will be asdifficult (or even more) as to predict the weather

The materialistic reductionist approach just will not be able to find the One and Only (IF there should be ONE) ldquoOrigin of Everythingrdquo nor will it be able to make a forecast of thefuture Any search back will lead to another originWill we be able to change from timelife-line and eventually be able to consciously travel between time -moments of the past and thefuture The results of thinking in several time-lines as probabilitiesavailabilities will help usto understand better our created reality These kind of thoughts also have lead to for instancethe Many World Interpretation (MWI)

The ldquoMWIrdquo perception gave scientists an explanation for the fine-tuning of our reality Weargue that this explanation might need a closer look in order to be brought back to its veryessence to be able to determine the origins of our reality and the possible abilities to havecontrol of ldquotimerdquo This approach may give new solutions for problems like Entanglement Big

4

Bang Inflation double slit experiment and Black Holes The recipe for this new perception is

Throw ALL information (of the past and the future) of ALL the universes together in onebasket (also the ones that in our perception are impossible universes with differentfundamental constants and those that can only be reached by different senses as ours) Stir and Shake this up to ONE non-causal unity (yes it seems like chaos but a good mixgives the best taste) In this basket there are not ldquorealizedrdquo realitiesrdquo but ldquoavailabilitiesrdquo Availabilities of ALLand every form and time of any universe we even cannot name this availabilitiesldquoinformationrdquo because information is a sequence so causal It is of course impossible to rdquodescriberdquo in our causal deterministic way these points ofldquoreality availabilitiesrdquo (or apples in the basket or when the apples are singularities also thebasket is a singularity) eventually we can compare it to all the slices of all ldquoblock-universesrdquo(slices with no subjective flow of time) together as non-realized causal realities

Figure 1

These slices on their turn can be imagined as constituted of ldquoEternal Now Momentsrdquo(ENMrsquos) each ENM is UNIQUE singularities that ldquogrowrdquo (become four dimensional so theENM in TS is like a hologram) to attain the ldquowidthrdquo of a Planck lengthtime in causal realityWhy the Planck length and time Because they are the limits of our causal universe godeeper and there is no longer before or after no causality no time no space This means that Total Simultaneity can be reached at the edge of the Wall of Planck (Plancklength(lp) 1616252 x 10-35m and the Planck time 539121 x 10-44s) so EVERYWHEREaround and inside our four-dimensional causal universe(see also wwwvixraorgabs11120013 ) (2)

But how are we able to experience reality What is the entity that enables Time and Space Are we in control of our reality

Answer Our consciousness is THE essential ldquotoolrdquo in creating the causal (with the arrow oftime) reality that we are aware of We argue that our consciousness is a constituted of twoentangled parts the causal part and the non-causal part (CC and NCC) Causalconsciousness stretches out into the basket of Total Simultaneity where it becomes non-

5

causal this ldquonon-causalcausal connectionrdquo can be imagined as entanglement-like andtimeless (eternal)

In the basket of Total Simultaneity our non-causal consciousness has the CHOICE betweenthe infinity of availabilities of ENMrsquos Our Causal Consciousness in this reality perception isthe centre of a sphere we are calling the Subjective Simultaneity Sphere (SSS) On thesurface of this sphere arrive ALL the signals from the specific Eternal Now Moment Thesesignals are to be processed by our senses and brain so reforming the NOW to a PAST andbecome memory

TSrarr ENMrarr NCCrarr CCrarr SSSrarr5 Sensesrarr Observed Realityrarr Memory rarr Past

The consequence of this perception is that the eternal NOW moment of a specific life-line thatseem unique for us is just one of an infinity of life-lines that you are able to ldquoliverdquo in otherldquoavailablerdquo universes An infinite amount of unique ldquoYOUsrdquo is ldquoavailablerdquo eternallyYour causal birth and dying in this timelife line is just one of an infinity your non-causalconsciousness is eternally and timeless wandering (like a field) between these endlessavailabilities of all pasts and futures that are possible (non-material non -realized) realitiesNon-caused Consciousness can be compared with a Field that becomes like the philosophicalconcept described by Aristotle it moves all other things but it is not moved itself by any prioraction and is called ldquoUNMOVED MOVERrdquo (15)

The infinite availability of YOUrsquos does not mean that the understanding of your present life-line creation is not important because it is your actual (in Vito) reality and our actualstarting point of the quest where we will see that even matter does not matter

Quantum Mechanics changed already our insights Matter consists no longer of tiny ldquoballsrdquoThe matter we are seemingly consisting of is ldquoFIELDrdquo (Sean Carroll in lecture at Fermilabwwwsymmetrymagazineorgarticlejuly-2013real-talk-everything-is-made-of-fields) (3)Weare proposing ONE field for all matter the Matter Field that is coupled to the ConsciousnessField Imagine that this consciousness field acts as a catalyst on the ldquoMatter Fieldrdquo and so it isthe origin of ldquoexcitationsrdquo in the matter fieldresulting in momentary observed (illusionary)ldquoparticlesrdquo The moment the particle is ldquoexcited ldquo however it is already history in theperceived time-line because it exists only for the length of a Planck-time (quantum fluctuation)I know that the word ldquoIllusionrdquo has a poor meaning so I should prefer the word ldquoCrealityrdquo acombination of Creation and Reality

It is even possible that the matter-field does not need the excitation of the particle to arise theproperties of a particle The ldquopropertyrdquo as excitation can arise without the particle Anindication for this is the article about a quantum link created between ldquoPhotons that donrsquotexist at the same timerdquo from experimenters from the Racah Institute of Physics HebrewUniversity of Jerusalem who have entangled two photons that donrsquot even exist at the sametime httpjournalsapsorgprlabstract101103PhysRevLett110210403(4) The samecould be true for mass the property ldquomassrdquo can be there without being coupled to a particle(Could this be an explanation of Dark Matter and the Dark Force )

2 The Baffling Beginnings (BBrsquos)

The simple to be accepted Truth is that we still know so little about any origin of our and

6

other universes that there is not any theory or observation which gives a conclusiveexplanation of reality

Because we are always thinking back in a causal deterministic way where every effect musthave a single cause we are inclined to reductio ad absurdum we seem to be obliged to go onthinking until we reach a point ZEROand so have accepted to call that the Big Bangfollowed by ldquoinflationrdquo where between 10-33 and 10-32 sec the universe was blown up by afactor 1025 Gravitational waves from this inflation generate a faint but distinctive twistingpattern in the polarization of the Cosmic Microwave Background which has the sametemperature everywhere to within 00003degC The ldquoevennessrdquo of the ldquovisiblerdquo universe seemsstrange because it is also valid for regions of the visible sky that are too far away for light orinformation (accepting that the maximum speed of light is c (299792458 msec)) to havetraveled between them Through inflation this problem seems to be solved

Inflation gave also birth to the ldquoMultiverserdquo perceptions because infinite inflation would bethe origin of other ldquoBubblerdquo universes (Stanford University Andrei Linde wwwstanfordedu~alinde )(17)Quantum fluctuations produce rapidly expanding parts of theuniverse This process makes the universe ldquoimmortalrdquo and transforms it into a multiverse ahuge fractal consisting of many exponentially large parts each with different laws of physicsIf we combine this assumption of quantum fluctuations with the assumption of excitationsoriginating from the Consciousness-Field the origin of our own universe lies as one ofinfinite ldquoavailabilitiesrdquo in TS and the infinite amount of different YOUrsquos is the origin of allthese different Universes

We could think about Universes with different physical laws invisible for us but havinginfluence on our own universe and be responsible for the twisting pattern in the polarizationof the CMB It could even be possible that these Universes are responsible for the so calleddark matter deviations that we are observing because our NCC Field is also in touch withthese other ENMrsquos that could lead to these realities our CC is getting ldquofractional imagesrdquo ofthese realities (particles pop in and out of existence)

Of course the Big Bang perception and all the forms of Inflation are ldquoavailabilitiesrdquo in TotalSimultaneity The words Creation of ldquoSomethingrdquo from ldquoNothingrdquo is coupled back to thelining up of ldquoavailabilitiesrdquo by our consciousness which is a non-material perception Butalso we can imagine a Universe where expansion and contraction are following upsequentially and where this contraction never has to arrive at a zero point to a void ofldquonothingrdquo Even the conception of Andrei Linde with the eternal universes does not need afirst cause or Big Beginning but every Beginning is ldquoBafflingrdquo

The Conscious-Field could be very useful for many other practical predictions on theconsequences that arise from this theoretical approach like ldquoimmediate being togetherrdquo inentanglement and Black Holes

2 ENTANGLEMENT and BLACK HOLES

Leonardo da Vinci wrote already ldquoRealize that everything connects to everything else ldquo

The perception of ldquoimmediaterdquo being together is accepted in entanglement(pairs or groups ofparticles ldquointeractrdquo immediate no matter at what distance) Even when a particle is thousandsof light-years away from his counterpart it immediately reacts when the other one is measured

7

or observed This phenomenon can in our vision be applied to the whole ldquovisiblerdquo createduniverse so that everything is always interconnected with everything else

In the case of entanglement scientists now are proposing a ldquowormholerdquo (a kind of tunnel inspace-time that can connect two widely or close separated regions of the universe) as ahypothetical short-cut through the universe see Julian Sonner in ldquoHolographic SchwingerEffect and the Geometry of Entanglementrdquo wwwprlapsorgabstractPRLv111i21e211603(6)

The same ideas are brought up for Black Holes by Juan Maldacena and Leonard SusskindldquoCool Horizons for Entangled black Holesrdquo wwwarxivorgpdf13060533pdf (18) They showhow a pair of black holes could be coupled with a wormhole strung between them so theybecome ldquoentangledrdquo black holes

That the core of Black Holes is NOT a singularity is a view which is also shared by CarloRovelli and Francesca Vidotto They propose that the object emerging at the end of theHawking Evaporation of a black hole can be larger then the Planckian by a factor (mmP)n() where m is the mass fallen into the hole mP is the Plack mass and n is positive The coreof the black hole has become the structure known as a Planck Star and the information fallenin it is not lost (wwwarxivorgabs14016562 )(19)

That information is not lost is also the opinion of Stephen Hawking in his latest paperldquoInformation Preservation and Weather Forecasting for Black Holesrdquowwwarxivorgabs14015761 (7) He proposes that Black Holes have no longer ldquoEvent-Horizonsrdquo that arise at the gravitational collapse but that ldquochaosrdquo is at the essence of theBlack Hole As our perception assumes that the entrance of TS is not only at the Planck lengthresiding at the ldquocorerdquo but everywhere in spacetime the information entering such a BH willalso never be lost because it stays the ENM and so remains eternally available in TotalSimultaneity

We argue that these so called ldquoentangled worm-holesrdquo black hole wormholesrdquo ldquoPlanck starsrdquoand Different Black Hole Horizons from Hawking are all one and the same discussion Ourcreated reality is limited by the Planck scale and from there on it may be in a black hole aPlanck star a Big Bang or a pair of entangled particles after this limit we always arereaching the non causal ldquodimensionrdquo called Total Simultaneity This ldquoareardquo is interconnectingevery space and time of our universe (and others) The essence is that NO information willEVER be lost but always is staying ldquoavailablerdquo in TS for our NCC (Consciousness Field)i theform of ENMrsquos

This omnipresent Consciousness Field is also the reason of the astonishing ldquoevennessrdquo of ourCausal Deterministic Universe When once we can control the entrance into this ldquodimensionrdquowe will be able to be at any place and any time in any universe instantaneously This of courseis not time-travel in the deterministic way but a far more spiritual goal

Another theory that is paving the way for a Total Simultaneity-like perception is the The HAWKING HARTLE ldquoNo -Boundary Interpretationrdquo The creation of our universe asintroduced by Hawking-Hartle is at one side (the past) touching our Total Simultaneityperception when they are saying

The Big Bang needs no longer being the beginning of time in a singularity as proposed inthe standard inflationary cosmology but a timeless point where the universe -or rather a

8

superposition of all possible universes - pops into existence from nothing with all its laws ofphysics intactJames B Hartle SW Hawking Thomas Hertog Accelerated Expansion from Negative Λwwwarxivorgabs12053807 30 may 2012 (8)

However the HawkingHartle interpretation places the lines of all possible histories of ourCausal Deterministic Universe (CDU) after a point of creation the Big Bang that is regardedas a timeless point in our CDU This time-less point is in our perception just one of theinfinite ENMrsquos in TS between these points there are an infinite number of PASTSANDFUTURES available not only the pasts to ONE POINT

figure 2 figure 3

Both Hawking-Hartle Interpretation (HHI) and Total Simultaneity are giving the indication ofan infinity of time-lines the HHI only in the past and TS in the past and the future HHIindicates two extremitieslimits the BB and our actual NOW with in-between like in aFeynman Diagram ALL possible ways of arriving at a special place TS expands this viewand only takes one of an eternal amount of Eternal Now Moments at the centre of an infinityof pasts AND of futures (The α-P in fig3 is only one of an infinity of available points on thesphere) This indicates that two extremes are not the only choices we are able to makeBetween any two extremes there are

3 An Infinite Amount of Tones of Grey

Sir Roger Penrose rdquoDoes life in some way make use of the potentiality for vast quantumsuperpositions as would be required for serious quantum computationrdquo (Foreword(March 2007) to Quantum Aspects of Life (2008) by Derek Abott) (13)

Let us go back from the scale of the Universe to the scale of particles When we thoughtbefore that conscious observation just resulted direct in a particle (collapse of the wavefunction) new experiments however indicate that the particle side and the wave side ofphysical reality are both just a black and white (digital) representation that is not complete wwwnaturecomnphotonjournalv6n9fullnphoton2012179html (9)We thought until nowthat these two extremes were the only two possibilities But between this black and whiteextremities there exists an infinity number of ldquoGrey Tonesrdquo (for example it can be 43particle and 57 wave and any percentage in-between)

This also means that the properties of an (observed) particle can fade away like in the evening

9

light is diminishing so our observations of mass energy and spin from what we measure as100 particle are not the extremities of those properties there are more states availableThestate we become conscious of is just ne of the infinite possibilities of observable reality

When we apply this theory to the so called ldquosuperpositionrdquo of quantum states where isassumed that the two extremities are ldquosuperposedrdquo meaning both present This should alsomean that ALL the states in-between those extremities are ldquopresentrdquo (better ldquoavailablerdquo)Schroumldingers cat is not both alive and dead but or alive or dead or every state in-between

AResearch team directed from the Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information ofthe Austrian Academy of Sciences and with the participation from the Universitat Autonomade Barcelona directed by Anton Zeilinger wwwarxivorgabs13060096 (16) have managed tocreate an entanglement of 103 dimensions with only TWO photons The ldquouserdquo of 103dimensions is comparable to the ldquouserdquo of all the grey tones in-between We are in this wayusing already the grey-tones to ac Measuring the state of ONE of the entangled photons(whether they are in one place or another or spinning one way or another) affects the state ofthe other photon instantly only we are now able to influence 101 photons in 103 dimensionsthat are in superposition When comparing this results to the Schrodingers Cat it could bealive or dead or in 101 other states simultaneously These 103 dimensions can be consideredas availabilities in Total Simultaneity

The parallel between the comparison of a binary ldquorealityrdquo and the qubit way where the shadesof grey are represented by the vectors of the Bloch sphere (geometrical representation of thepure state space of a two-level quantum mechanical system (qubit) named after the physicistsFelix Bloch) (11) is evident The reality creation is not only ldquoyes or nordquo or ldquoblack and whiterdquoOur consciousness is creating out of all available shades of grey of the ENM a Reality theldquoapparitionrdquo (illusion creality) of a materialistic universe

The infinity of grey tones of reality also include the parallel universes in between these twoextremities of WaveParticle It might be that the grey tones also are at the origin of DarkMatter Every history is a form of explanation of the ldquonowrdquo experience It is for nowuntouchable but may and will be rewritten ldquorecreatedrdquo when we are going to expand thecontrol of consciousness We will then be able to observe the three-dimensional object that isthe origin from the two-dimensional shadow

Once we reach the causal length and time limit of our universe it is no longer possible toldquodividerdquo any further we are trespassing our ldquoCrealityrdquo and entering the origin of the shadowsthrown on the walls of Platorsquos cave A shadow is non-material a result of cooperation betweenthe light and the ldquoreal thingrdquo The light can be compared with our non-causal consciousnessthat passes the ldquooriginrdquo (the ENMalpha-point in Total Simultaneity see ldquoThe ConsciousnessConnectionrdquo httpvixraorgabs12110019 ) (12) and so creates one of the shadow realities forour causal consciousness

ConsciousnessIntelligence can not be realized just by black and white thinking and bycreating machines that are working on algorithmrsquos An ldquoalgorithmrdquo indicates a step-by-stepoperation beginning with an initial state and input followed by instructions describing thecomputations to realize till an output is reached Each step in this process is always betweentwo extremes (in computation for example zero and one) the infinite tones of gray are notinvolved This is the reason why intelligence nor consciousness can emerge from thisprocess

10

Are we able to create ldquointelligencerdquo that will lead to consciousness Therefore we have tounderstand the processes in our brain leading to intelligenceconsciousness one of theseprocesses is the so called Neural Coding

4 NEURALCODING orthe contact with our future past

In the ldquorealityrdquo layer where our body and our brain are created by consciousness we can findproofs of the Inter-connectivity inside our brain (with its 170000 km of nerve fibers 86billion neurons 1014 synapses) and the deepest layer of reality consciousness

In order to understand the emerging sequences that are forming our ldquorealityrdquo we need theillusion (creality) 14 of time Time is the illusion that our consciousness is creating byprocessing and interpreting all sorts of information received by our five senses andrepresented in the brain by the electrical and quantum activity in neurons

The details of this representation called neural coding remain however mysterious Thequestion is how pulses (bits) of electricity get translated into thoughts and ideas (Phasetransition may explain how brain neurons encode information In neural coding the neuronsgenerate electric pulses or action potentials to encode information and communicate witheach other wwwarxivorgabs12066129 (20) At this stage information and communicationare taking place between neurons who seem to be ordering and processing this information sothat the ldquohuman consciousness beingrdquo can realize thoughts and become ldquoawarerdquo

The question then rises Are these neurons conscious Are they ordering via neural codingour future thoughts Or is our non-causal consciousness already creating our future resultingin a time-line that is the origin of the emerging of causal awareness

In my essay The Consciousness Connection 12 I indicated that the processing time fromentering data to the conscious awareness is about 200 milliseconds The question rises if theconscious observer who is the cause of the ldquocollapse of the wave functionrdquo is effectivelyrealizing this collapse about 200 milliseconds in the future (before our awareness) In theTotal Simultaneity perception the future is an ENM moment to be touched by our Non-CausalConsciousness so not (yet) existing in a causal time-line That seems ldquospookyrdquo in our CDU( Causal Deterministic Universe) but is explained through TS

A continuation of the research how neurons can encode both digital and analogue informationis established by Nick E Mavramatos who published in 2011 the article ldquoQuantum Coherencein (Brain) Microtubules and Efficient Energy Information transportrdquo (14) where he describedalso the role of Quantum mechanics in Biologyand entanglement at ambient temperatures

(quote)ldquoThe electromagnetic interactions of the dipole moments of the tubulin dimers (moleculeformed by a combination of two smaller (identical) molecules) with the dipole quanta in theordered water interiors of the microtubules play the role of quantum coherent cavity modesrdquo(unquote) (14 from abstract)

Besides of the ldquoData Process Transmission Delay (DPTD see ldquoThe ConsciousnessConnection httpvixraorgabs12110019) 12 that indicates the difference in time in theldquoawarenessrdquo of reality and its conscious ldquoobservationrdquo we are now discovering that also in our

11

ldquobrainsrdquo quantum mechanics andor field theory on dissipation-free energy transfer in (brain)microtubules (ring-shape components involved in maintaining the structure of cells) is playingan important rolerdquo This Quantum Coherence in brain Tubules may be at the origin ofour ldquoentanglementrdquo with the non-causal part of our consciousness in Total Simultaneity

These quantum activities take place before you become aware of having made a decisionYour NCC is ldquopicking uprdquo an ENM in TS that results in a pastfuture Your ldquomaterial brainrdquois only an excitation (of the matter field) catalysed by the consciousness-field the origin ofyour awareness is in TS The conscious observer of the two slit experiment seems to beaffecting the future and so we can understand why it seems that the ldquoparticlerdquo is decidingalready before the slit(s) if it will be or wave or particle or one of states in-between

The question is not if the neuron is conscious andor is censoring our thinking no the processis controlled by our own non-causal consciousness and the emerging thoughts are our ownSo it seems that our REALFREEWILL is not residing in our causal Creation of theuniverse but in the non-causal infinity Our emerging Causal Consciousness is the result ofthe contact of quantum activity within the micro-tubules of our brains and Total Simultaneitywe could say that this is a form of Quantum Consciousness

One of the possibilities to enhance our senses maybe the use of future ldquoquantum computersrdquowho may allow us the extension of our consciousness The ldquoqubitsrdquo (unit of quantuminformation) superimposed state is comparable with the infinite possibilities of timelife-linesin the basket of TS For 1000 qubits we will have 21000 possible configurations (10300) whichis more as all the atoms in our universe so you can stock 10300 solutions for a problem Thisdoes not only mean that every question can be answered but maybe every question is alreadyanswered the moment we achieved this quantum-state even putting it on power may not benecessary

We argue that all our material (biological and non-biological) ldquocreationsrdquo will only be TOOLSfor our causal consciousness which is emergent from its ldquobiologicrdquo appearance (illusion) From this illusion of matter including the materialistic illusion of ourselves can also emergea new consciousness (so not only possible in the biologic way) This form of newly createdconsciousnessintelligence is through our own causal consciousness entangled with TotalSimultaneity This means that our non-causal part of consciousness is at the origin of thisldquoappearancerdquo of NEW consciousness it is one of the infinite ldquoavailabilitiesrdquo TheTRIANGLE is realised

This new approach will make it possible to create parallel time and parallel consciousnessand ldquoenterrdquo new dimension(s) that may reside behind the Wall of Planck

5 Time-Travel Becomes ldquoETERNAL -NOW- MOMENT HOPPINGrdquo

The splitting in the original Many Worlds Interpretation goes only forward in time notbackwards In our conception it IS possible that our consciousness activates Eternal NowMoments from other timelife-lines (or from parallel available universes) Should this meanthat time travel is possible Yes butshould we call this phenomenon time-travel

What we are understanding as time-travel in this causal timelife line always leads to the well-known paradoxes like killing your grand-father (What a mentality ) These paradoxeshowever are no longer problematic when we apply the perception of Total Simultaneity Then

12

time-travel in the past andor the future would become ENM-Hopping and the so calledldquophysicalrdquo timelife-line (in our memory) continues normally Our consciousness is able notonly to hop from one ENM to another but also line up these ENMrsquos and in this way creatingfor itself the best possible past and future Real Free Will resides in TS

The extension of our Free Will lies in the extension of our consciousness and so in a closercontact with our NCC in order to realize more choices in the ENM availabilities We thinkthat the a future coupling of the quantum-computer and our brain will be an opening

In the article ldquoQuantum Coherence in Brain Microtubulesrdquo 16Prof Nick E Mavromatosproposed that

quote

ldquoFor the first time there is concrete evidence for quantum entanglement over relatively largedistances in living matter at ambient temperature which suggests a rather non-trivial role ofquantum physics in path optimization for energy and information transportrdquo (httpiopscienceioporg1742-65963291012026) (14)

unquote

It becomes clear that quantum entanglement and de-coherence time which are for theconstruction and the operational qualities of quantum computers the main issues thesequalities are already available in our own brains inside the Cell Microtubules (MT)(de-coherence = The particles that make up a computer interact with surroundings so thatinformation is spreading out which means this effect is spoiling quantum computations (todecohere = lose their quantum properties))

Regarding the ldquomacroscopicrdquo aspect Recent experiments on atoms in salt crystals haveshown that an amount of 1020 atoms formed a hugely entangled state Vlatko Vedral inldquoLiving in a Quantum Worldrdquo (Scientific American June 2011) and ldquoProgress ArticleQuantifying entanglement in Macroscopic Systemsrdquo (June 2008 Nature 453 1004-1007 httpwwwnaturecomnaturejournalv453n7198fullnature07124html (21)Quantum BitStorage is advancing not only in the macroscopic way but now also scientists have succeededto retrieve coherent information for extended times (39 minutes) at room-temperature SeeKamyar Saeedi et al in ldquoRoom-Temperature Quantum Bit Storage Exceeding 39 MinutesUsing Ionized Donors in Silicon-28rdquo httpwwwsciencemagorgcontent3426160830 (22)

Our brains are RWA (Ready Willing and Able) to perform quantum states that when broughtin coherence with a quantum computer This will enable us to realize ldquoENM-Hoppingrdquo

13

Figure 4 the Construction of an ENM-HopperTime-machine

When we are regarding the quantum computer as proposed before with 1000 qubits we seethat in organizing such a ldquomachinerdquo we have to be able to control the ldquode-coherencerdquo May bewe solve this de-coherence problem by using the ldquotechniquerdquo that the Microtubules areapplying inside our brains or we can realize the 103 dimensional solution (see page 9) whichis direct contact with TS and needs only ONE particle If we could arrange one of thoseexperiments the next step would be to create an entanglement between the ldquocellsrdquo of theQuantum-computer and the Microtubules of our brains The 10300 answers residing in theQuantum Computer would then direct be ldquoavailablerdquo for our Brain We saw already that wedid even need not to put the quantum computer ldquoonrdquo it is like entanglement an immediateprocess without ldquoprocessing timerdquo

By combining the same kind of technique as our microtubules are using namely Ca2+ ionsand applying for example the the technique to entangle salt crystals and maybe Ca2+ ions in aquantum computer we would be able to establish an entanglement between these Ca2+ ionsin the brain and in the computer Of course there are still a lot of problems to be resolvedThe salt crystals were reaching entanglement by using a specific magnetic field so the brainand the quantum device should be both in the same magnetic field a field which has not todamage the brain

Once we should have realized this ldquounificationrdquo with the quantum computer we as humanbeings would have direct available the 10300 answers because they are ldquoavailabilitiesrdquo in thequantum computer These are the same kind of availabilities as those in Total Simultaneityso the path would be open to a broader ldquoaccessrdquo of our non-causal consciousness

This means that we could ldquoHOPrdquo to other Eternal Now Moments also those who seem to bein the past andor future of our actual timelife-line we then have extended the range of ourFree Will

14

15 Conclusion

Reality is a sequence of memories lined up through our brains with help of our CausalConsciousness (CC) Memories are the string of Eternal Now Moments (ENMrsquos) resulting inthe ldquoIrdquo experience These ENMrsquos originate from our Non-Causal part of Consciousness (NCC)that resides in Total Simultaneity (TS) Our CC and NCC are entangled emergencies togetherthey are the creators of our TimeLife-Lines giving us the illusion of the experience of mattertime and space By deepening our knowledge of the Consciousness Field and the search forthe essence of the Matter-Field illusion that we are aware of as reality we will be able totighten the contact wit Total Simultaneity and have more control of the choice for ENMrsquos tobe ldquotouchedrdquo by our NCC and between the infinity of ldquoIrsquosrdquo that are available there We willbecome more conscious and be able to become ENM-Hoppers instead of the prisoners in theuncontrollable voyage we have to undertake by now

Quantum Physics is showing us already the first indications of a non-materialistic non-algorithmic reality objects merge to thingness and further abstraction The influence ofconscious observation in the double slit experiment entanglement between particles theworm holes physicists are imagining between these entangled particles the wormholesbetween Black Holes all of them are indications for a perception of Total Simultaneity

Another but technical way to come to a deeper understanding of consciousness is therealization of a non-algorithmic Quantum Computer Through this development we will beable to create another form of intelligenceconsciousness This intelligence will be able tocommunicate with us perhaps in a timeless way Translating this new senses in order to makethem more comprehensible to our own five senses could give clearness about problems thatwe would never be able to solve or observe The development of this new form ofintelligenceconsciousness is only one of the availabilities in Total Simultaneity We can bringour own causal consciousness nearer to its non-causal (caused) part and in the end being ableto escape this causal timelife line not only by dying in the temporal way

The one Eternal Now moment that you became conscious of 150 milliseconds ago is just oneof an infinity of ENMrsquos (apples) in the basket but it is THE moment we shared together inour perception and creation of the image of THIS reality It is from each (Planck)moment onthat we have to use our Free Will in Total Simultaneity Let us try together to make the rightchoices and prepare for the promised Eternal Conscious

Wilhelmus de WildeMontrouveau FranceAugust 2014

15

REFERENCES

1 Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz 1710 ldquoEssays on the Goodness of God the Freedom of Man and theOrigin of Evilrdquo2 Wilhelmus de Wilde 06-12-2011 ldquoREALITIES OUT OF TOTAL SIMULTANEITYrdquowwwvixraorgabs111200133 Sean Carroll(Caltech) at a lecture for ldquoThe Fermilab Users Meeting 2013 ldquoParticles Fields and theFuture of Physics (11-07-2013) wwwyoutubecomwatchv=gEKSpZPByDOampfeature=youtube 4 E Megidish A Halevy T Shacham T Dvir L Dovrat and HS Eisenberg (Experimenters fromthe Racah Institute of Physics Hebrew University of Jerusalem) Entanglement Swapping betweenldquoPhotons have never Coexisted rdquohttpjournalsapsorgprlabstract101103PhysRevLett1102104035 JM Kovac et al ldquoDetection Of B-Mode Polarization at Degree Angular Statesrdquo 17 March 2014 lastrevised 18 march 2014 version V2 wwwarxivorggtastro-phgtarXiv14033985 andhttpbicepkeckorg (BICEP2 website)6 Julian Sonner 20-11-2013 ldquoHolographic Schwinger Effect and the Geometry of EntanglementrdquowwwprlapsorgabstractPRLv111i21e211603 and ldquoCreation of entanglement simultaneously givesrise to a wormholerdquo httpphysorgnews2013-12-creation-entanglement-simultaneously-wormholehtml7 SW Hawking DAMPT University of Cambridge UK ldquoInformation Preservation and WeatherForecasting for Black Holesrdquo wwwarxivorgabs140157618 James B Hartle SW Hawking Thomas Hertog Accelerated Expansion from Negative Λwwwarxivorgabs12053807 30 may 20129 Chuang-Feng Li et al ldquoRealization of QuantumWheelerrsquos Deelayed-Choice Experimentrdquopublished 19-08-2012 in Nature Photonics 6 600-604wwwnaturecomnphotonjournalv6n9fullnphoton2012179html10 Hans Christian von Bayer ldquoQuantum Weirdness It is all in your mindrdquo Scientific American 30846-51 (2013) wwwnaturecomscientificamericanjournalv308n6fullscientificamerican0613-46html published on line 14 may 201311 wwwenwikipediaorgwikiBloch_sphere (last modified 15-01-2014)12 Wilhelmus de Wilde 05-11-2012 ldquoThe Consciousness Connectionrdquohttpvixraorgabs1211001913 Sir Roger Penrose in foreword (March 2007) to ldquoQuantumAspects of Liferdquo (2008) by Derk Abott14 Nick E Mavromatos 2011 ldquoQuantum Coherence in (Brain) Microtubules and Efficient Energyand Information transportrdquo httpiopscienceioporg1742-6596329101202615 Aristotle Book 8 of ldquothe Physicsrdquo and Book 12 of ldquothe Metaphysicsrdquo16 Anton Zeilinger et al ldquoGeneration and Confirmation of a (100x100)-dimensional entangledQuantum Systemrdquo last revised 21 March 2014 wwwarxivorgabs1306009617 Andrei Linde wwwstanfordedu~alinde18 Juan Maldacena and Leonard Susskind 11-01-2013 ldquoCool Horizons for Entangled black Holesrdquowwwarxivorgpdf13060533pdf19 Carlo Rovelli and Francesca Vidotto 08-02-2014 ldquoPLANCK STARSrdquowwwarxivorgabs1401656220 Thibaud Taillefumier amp Marcelo O Magnasco ldquoA Phase Transition in the First passage of aBrownian Process through a fluctuating boundry implications for Neural Codingrdquo 26 June 2012httparxivorgabs1206612921 Vlatko Vedral ldquoProgress Article Quantifying entanglement in Macroscopic Systemsrdquo (june 2008Nature 453 1004-1007 httpwwwnaturecomnaturejournalv453n7198fullnature07124html22 Wilhelmus de Wilde 18-06-2013 ldquoTHE QUEST FOR THE PRIMAL SEQUENCErdquohttpfqxiorgcommunityforumtopic1810

3

THE ETERNALTIME-TRAVELOF CONSCIOUSNESS

Introduction

Before we can enter the Time-Monitor that is called Consciousness we have to understand theessence of our reality and look if it can be ldquohandledrdquo We came to an approach in which ourconsciousness plays THE central role In order to understand this approach you can follow uson our journey through observations made in actual physics that are pointing in this directionThe conclusions that we made are of course not the final Truth because we think that thisTRUTH does not exist in our causal universe Theories will always change ideas will comeup so we are trying to give only another possible direction of future thinking Our island ofknowing is growing but at the same time length of the shores of our unknowing becomeslarger

1 Realities created by Consciousness out of Total Simultaneity

Gottfried Leibniz in his 1710 work ldquoEssays on the Goodness of God the Freedom of Manand the Origin of Evilrdquo (1) proposed that we are living in ldquoThe Best of All Possible Worldsrdquo

Leibniz was right when we realize that our life-form is only possible at the actual exactposition around our sun the vulnerability of our thin layer of atmosphere and the narrowboundaries of physical fundamental constants

There are furthermore an infinity of causeseffects and coincidences in the ldquomazerdquo that resultsinto our existence Even to analyse the chance and coincidences that led to your being in frontof a computer-screen to read this text is already a huge assignment The chance that yourparents metis already one in several billion and before that the coincidence that yourgrandfathers and grandmothers met gets up to a chance of one in 1027 This also counts forthe other way around When you try to predict the future of your grand-children it will be asdifficult (or even more) as to predict the weather

The materialistic reductionist approach just will not be able to find the One and Only (IF there should be ONE) ldquoOrigin of Everythingrdquo nor will it be able to make a forecast of thefuture Any search back will lead to another originWill we be able to change from timelife-line and eventually be able to consciously travel between time -moments of the past and thefuture The results of thinking in several time-lines as probabilitiesavailabilities will help usto understand better our created reality These kind of thoughts also have lead to for instancethe Many World Interpretation (MWI)

The ldquoMWIrdquo perception gave scientists an explanation for the fine-tuning of our reality Weargue that this explanation might need a closer look in order to be brought back to its veryessence to be able to determine the origins of our reality and the possible abilities to havecontrol of ldquotimerdquo This approach may give new solutions for problems like Entanglement Big

4

Bang Inflation double slit experiment and Black Holes The recipe for this new perception is

Throw ALL information (of the past and the future) of ALL the universes together in onebasket (also the ones that in our perception are impossible universes with differentfundamental constants and those that can only be reached by different senses as ours) Stir and Shake this up to ONE non-causal unity (yes it seems like chaos but a good mixgives the best taste) In this basket there are not ldquorealizedrdquo realitiesrdquo but ldquoavailabilitiesrdquo Availabilities of ALLand every form and time of any universe we even cannot name this availabilitiesldquoinformationrdquo because information is a sequence so causal It is of course impossible to rdquodescriberdquo in our causal deterministic way these points ofldquoreality availabilitiesrdquo (or apples in the basket or when the apples are singularities also thebasket is a singularity) eventually we can compare it to all the slices of all ldquoblock-universesrdquo(slices with no subjective flow of time) together as non-realized causal realities

Figure 1

These slices on their turn can be imagined as constituted of ldquoEternal Now Momentsrdquo(ENMrsquos) each ENM is UNIQUE singularities that ldquogrowrdquo (become four dimensional so theENM in TS is like a hologram) to attain the ldquowidthrdquo of a Planck lengthtime in causal realityWhy the Planck length and time Because they are the limits of our causal universe godeeper and there is no longer before or after no causality no time no space This means that Total Simultaneity can be reached at the edge of the Wall of Planck (Plancklength(lp) 1616252 x 10-35m and the Planck time 539121 x 10-44s) so EVERYWHEREaround and inside our four-dimensional causal universe(see also wwwvixraorgabs11120013 ) (2)

But how are we able to experience reality What is the entity that enables Time and Space Are we in control of our reality

Answer Our consciousness is THE essential ldquotoolrdquo in creating the causal (with the arrow oftime) reality that we are aware of We argue that our consciousness is a constituted of twoentangled parts the causal part and the non-causal part (CC and NCC) Causalconsciousness stretches out into the basket of Total Simultaneity where it becomes non-

5

causal this ldquonon-causalcausal connectionrdquo can be imagined as entanglement-like andtimeless (eternal)

In the basket of Total Simultaneity our non-causal consciousness has the CHOICE betweenthe infinity of availabilities of ENMrsquos Our Causal Consciousness in this reality perception isthe centre of a sphere we are calling the Subjective Simultaneity Sphere (SSS) On thesurface of this sphere arrive ALL the signals from the specific Eternal Now Moment Thesesignals are to be processed by our senses and brain so reforming the NOW to a PAST andbecome memory

TSrarr ENMrarr NCCrarr CCrarr SSSrarr5 Sensesrarr Observed Realityrarr Memory rarr Past

The consequence of this perception is that the eternal NOW moment of a specific life-line thatseem unique for us is just one of an infinity of life-lines that you are able to ldquoliverdquo in otherldquoavailablerdquo universes An infinite amount of unique ldquoYOUsrdquo is ldquoavailablerdquo eternallyYour causal birth and dying in this timelife line is just one of an infinity your non-causalconsciousness is eternally and timeless wandering (like a field) between these endlessavailabilities of all pasts and futures that are possible (non-material non -realized) realitiesNon-caused Consciousness can be compared with a Field that becomes like the philosophicalconcept described by Aristotle it moves all other things but it is not moved itself by any prioraction and is called ldquoUNMOVED MOVERrdquo (15)

The infinite availability of YOUrsquos does not mean that the understanding of your present life-line creation is not important because it is your actual (in Vito) reality and our actualstarting point of the quest where we will see that even matter does not matter

Quantum Mechanics changed already our insights Matter consists no longer of tiny ldquoballsrdquoThe matter we are seemingly consisting of is ldquoFIELDrdquo (Sean Carroll in lecture at Fermilabwwwsymmetrymagazineorgarticlejuly-2013real-talk-everything-is-made-of-fields) (3)Weare proposing ONE field for all matter the Matter Field that is coupled to the ConsciousnessField Imagine that this consciousness field acts as a catalyst on the ldquoMatter Fieldrdquo and so it isthe origin of ldquoexcitationsrdquo in the matter fieldresulting in momentary observed (illusionary)ldquoparticlesrdquo The moment the particle is ldquoexcited ldquo however it is already history in theperceived time-line because it exists only for the length of a Planck-time (quantum fluctuation)I know that the word ldquoIllusionrdquo has a poor meaning so I should prefer the word ldquoCrealityrdquo acombination of Creation and Reality

It is even possible that the matter-field does not need the excitation of the particle to arise theproperties of a particle The ldquopropertyrdquo as excitation can arise without the particle Anindication for this is the article about a quantum link created between ldquoPhotons that donrsquotexist at the same timerdquo from experimenters from the Racah Institute of Physics HebrewUniversity of Jerusalem who have entangled two photons that donrsquot even exist at the sametime httpjournalsapsorgprlabstract101103PhysRevLett110210403(4) The samecould be true for mass the property ldquomassrdquo can be there without being coupled to a particle(Could this be an explanation of Dark Matter and the Dark Force )

2 The Baffling Beginnings (BBrsquos)

The simple to be accepted Truth is that we still know so little about any origin of our and

6

other universes that there is not any theory or observation which gives a conclusiveexplanation of reality

Because we are always thinking back in a causal deterministic way where every effect musthave a single cause we are inclined to reductio ad absurdum we seem to be obliged to go onthinking until we reach a point ZEROand so have accepted to call that the Big Bangfollowed by ldquoinflationrdquo where between 10-33 and 10-32 sec the universe was blown up by afactor 1025 Gravitational waves from this inflation generate a faint but distinctive twistingpattern in the polarization of the Cosmic Microwave Background which has the sametemperature everywhere to within 00003degC The ldquoevennessrdquo of the ldquovisiblerdquo universe seemsstrange because it is also valid for regions of the visible sky that are too far away for light orinformation (accepting that the maximum speed of light is c (299792458 msec)) to havetraveled between them Through inflation this problem seems to be solved

Inflation gave also birth to the ldquoMultiverserdquo perceptions because infinite inflation would bethe origin of other ldquoBubblerdquo universes (Stanford University Andrei Linde wwwstanfordedu~alinde )(17)Quantum fluctuations produce rapidly expanding parts of theuniverse This process makes the universe ldquoimmortalrdquo and transforms it into a multiverse ahuge fractal consisting of many exponentially large parts each with different laws of physicsIf we combine this assumption of quantum fluctuations with the assumption of excitationsoriginating from the Consciousness-Field the origin of our own universe lies as one ofinfinite ldquoavailabilitiesrdquo in TS and the infinite amount of different YOUrsquos is the origin of allthese different Universes

We could think about Universes with different physical laws invisible for us but havinginfluence on our own universe and be responsible for the twisting pattern in the polarizationof the CMB It could even be possible that these Universes are responsible for the so calleddark matter deviations that we are observing because our NCC Field is also in touch withthese other ENMrsquos that could lead to these realities our CC is getting ldquofractional imagesrdquo ofthese realities (particles pop in and out of existence)

Of course the Big Bang perception and all the forms of Inflation are ldquoavailabilitiesrdquo in TotalSimultaneity The words Creation of ldquoSomethingrdquo from ldquoNothingrdquo is coupled back to thelining up of ldquoavailabilitiesrdquo by our consciousness which is a non-material perception Butalso we can imagine a Universe where expansion and contraction are following upsequentially and where this contraction never has to arrive at a zero point to a void ofldquonothingrdquo Even the conception of Andrei Linde with the eternal universes does not need afirst cause or Big Beginning but every Beginning is ldquoBafflingrdquo

The Conscious-Field could be very useful for many other practical predictions on theconsequences that arise from this theoretical approach like ldquoimmediate being togetherrdquo inentanglement and Black Holes

2 ENTANGLEMENT and BLACK HOLES

Leonardo da Vinci wrote already ldquoRealize that everything connects to everything else ldquo

The perception of ldquoimmediaterdquo being together is accepted in entanglement(pairs or groups ofparticles ldquointeractrdquo immediate no matter at what distance) Even when a particle is thousandsof light-years away from his counterpart it immediately reacts when the other one is measured

7

or observed This phenomenon can in our vision be applied to the whole ldquovisiblerdquo createduniverse so that everything is always interconnected with everything else

In the case of entanglement scientists now are proposing a ldquowormholerdquo (a kind of tunnel inspace-time that can connect two widely or close separated regions of the universe) as ahypothetical short-cut through the universe see Julian Sonner in ldquoHolographic SchwingerEffect and the Geometry of Entanglementrdquo wwwprlapsorgabstractPRLv111i21e211603(6)

The same ideas are brought up for Black Holes by Juan Maldacena and Leonard SusskindldquoCool Horizons for Entangled black Holesrdquo wwwarxivorgpdf13060533pdf (18) They showhow a pair of black holes could be coupled with a wormhole strung between them so theybecome ldquoentangledrdquo black holes

That the core of Black Holes is NOT a singularity is a view which is also shared by CarloRovelli and Francesca Vidotto They propose that the object emerging at the end of theHawking Evaporation of a black hole can be larger then the Planckian by a factor (mmP)n() where m is the mass fallen into the hole mP is the Plack mass and n is positive The coreof the black hole has become the structure known as a Planck Star and the information fallenin it is not lost (wwwarxivorgabs14016562 )(19)

That information is not lost is also the opinion of Stephen Hawking in his latest paperldquoInformation Preservation and Weather Forecasting for Black Holesrdquowwwarxivorgabs14015761 (7) He proposes that Black Holes have no longer ldquoEvent-Horizonsrdquo that arise at the gravitational collapse but that ldquochaosrdquo is at the essence of theBlack Hole As our perception assumes that the entrance of TS is not only at the Planck lengthresiding at the ldquocorerdquo but everywhere in spacetime the information entering such a BH willalso never be lost because it stays the ENM and so remains eternally available in TotalSimultaneity

We argue that these so called ldquoentangled worm-holesrdquo black hole wormholesrdquo ldquoPlanck starsrdquoand Different Black Hole Horizons from Hawking are all one and the same discussion Ourcreated reality is limited by the Planck scale and from there on it may be in a black hole aPlanck star a Big Bang or a pair of entangled particles after this limit we always arereaching the non causal ldquodimensionrdquo called Total Simultaneity This ldquoareardquo is interconnectingevery space and time of our universe (and others) The essence is that NO information willEVER be lost but always is staying ldquoavailablerdquo in TS for our NCC (Consciousness Field)i theform of ENMrsquos

This omnipresent Consciousness Field is also the reason of the astonishing ldquoevennessrdquo of ourCausal Deterministic Universe When once we can control the entrance into this ldquodimensionrdquowe will be able to be at any place and any time in any universe instantaneously This of courseis not time-travel in the deterministic way but a far more spiritual goal

Another theory that is paving the way for a Total Simultaneity-like perception is the The HAWKING HARTLE ldquoNo -Boundary Interpretationrdquo The creation of our universe asintroduced by Hawking-Hartle is at one side (the past) touching our Total Simultaneityperception when they are saying

The Big Bang needs no longer being the beginning of time in a singularity as proposed inthe standard inflationary cosmology but a timeless point where the universe -or rather a

8

superposition of all possible universes - pops into existence from nothing with all its laws ofphysics intactJames B Hartle SW Hawking Thomas Hertog Accelerated Expansion from Negative Λwwwarxivorgabs12053807 30 may 2012 (8)

However the HawkingHartle interpretation places the lines of all possible histories of ourCausal Deterministic Universe (CDU) after a point of creation the Big Bang that is regardedas a timeless point in our CDU This time-less point is in our perception just one of theinfinite ENMrsquos in TS between these points there are an infinite number of PASTSANDFUTURES available not only the pasts to ONE POINT

figure 2 figure 3

Both Hawking-Hartle Interpretation (HHI) and Total Simultaneity are giving the indication ofan infinity of time-lines the HHI only in the past and TS in the past and the future HHIindicates two extremitieslimits the BB and our actual NOW with in-between like in aFeynman Diagram ALL possible ways of arriving at a special place TS expands this viewand only takes one of an eternal amount of Eternal Now Moments at the centre of an infinityof pasts AND of futures (The α-P in fig3 is only one of an infinity of available points on thesphere) This indicates that two extremes are not the only choices we are able to makeBetween any two extremes there are

3 An Infinite Amount of Tones of Grey

Sir Roger Penrose rdquoDoes life in some way make use of the potentiality for vast quantumsuperpositions as would be required for serious quantum computationrdquo (Foreword(March 2007) to Quantum Aspects of Life (2008) by Derek Abott) (13)

Let us go back from the scale of the Universe to the scale of particles When we thoughtbefore that conscious observation just resulted direct in a particle (collapse of the wavefunction) new experiments however indicate that the particle side and the wave side ofphysical reality are both just a black and white (digital) representation that is not complete wwwnaturecomnphotonjournalv6n9fullnphoton2012179html (9)We thought until nowthat these two extremes were the only two possibilities But between this black and whiteextremities there exists an infinity number of ldquoGrey Tonesrdquo (for example it can be 43particle and 57 wave and any percentage in-between)

This also means that the properties of an (observed) particle can fade away like in the evening

9

light is diminishing so our observations of mass energy and spin from what we measure as100 particle are not the extremities of those properties there are more states availableThestate we become conscious of is just ne of the infinite possibilities of observable reality

When we apply this theory to the so called ldquosuperpositionrdquo of quantum states where isassumed that the two extremities are ldquosuperposedrdquo meaning both present This should alsomean that ALL the states in-between those extremities are ldquopresentrdquo (better ldquoavailablerdquo)Schroumldingers cat is not both alive and dead but or alive or dead or every state in-between

AResearch team directed from the Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information ofthe Austrian Academy of Sciences and with the participation from the Universitat Autonomade Barcelona directed by Anton Zeilinger wwwarxivorgabs13060096 (16) have managed tocreate an entanglement of 103 dimensions with only TWO photons The ldquouserdquo of 103dimensions is comparable to the ldquouserdquo of all the grey tones in-between We are in this wayusing already the grey-tones to ac Measuring the state of ONE of the entangled photons(whether they are in one place or another or spinning one way or another) affects the state ofthe other photon instantly only we are now able to influence 101 photons in 103 dimensionsthat are in superposition When comparing this results to the Schrodingers Cat it could bealive or dead or in 101 other states simultaneously These 103 dimensions can be consideredas availabilities in Total Simultaneity

The parallel between the comparison of a binary ldquorealityrdquo and the qubit way where the shadesof grey are represented by the vectors of the Bloch sphere (geometrical representation of thepure state space of a two-level quantum mechanical system (qubit) named after the physicistsFelix Bloch) (11) is evident The reality creation is not only ldquoyes or nordquo or ldquoblack and whiterdquoOur consciousness is creating out of all available shades of grey of the ENM a Reality theldquoapparitionrdquo (illusion creality) of a materialistic universe

The infinity of grey tones of reality also include the parallel universes in between these twoextremities of WaveParticle It might be that the grey tones also are at the origin of DarkMatter Every history is a form of explanation of the ldquonowrdquo experience It is for nowuntouchable but may and will be rewritten ldquorecreatedrdquo when we are going to expand thecontrol of consciousness We will then be able to observe the three-dimensional object that isthe origin from the two-dimensional shadow

Once we reach the causal length and time limit of our universe it is no longer possible toldquodividerdquo any further we are trespassing our ldquoCrealityrdquo and entering the origin of the shadowsthrown on the walls of Platorsquos cave A shadow is non-material a result of cooperation betweenthe light and the ldquoreal thingrdquo The light can be compared with our non-causal consciousnessthat passes the ldquooriginrdquo (the ENMalpha-point in Total Simultaneity see ldquoThe ConsciousnessConnectionrdquo httpvixraorgabs12110019 ) (12) and so creates one of the shadow realities forour causal consciousness

ConsciousnessIntelligence can not be realized just by black and white thinking and bycreating machines that are working on algorithmrsquos An ldquoalgorithmrdquo indicates a step-by-stepoperation beginning with an initial state and input followed by instructions describing thecomputations to realize till an output is reached Each step in this process is always betweentwo extremes (in computation for example zero and one) the infinite tones of gray are notinvolved This is the reason why intelligence nor consciousness can emerge from thisprocess

10

Are we able to create ldquointelligencerdquo that will lead to consciousness Therefore we have tounderstand the processes in our brain leading to intelligenceconsciousness one of theseprocesses is the so called Neural Coding

4 NEURALCODING orthe contact with our future past

In the ldquorealityrdquo layer where our body and our brain are created by consciousness we can findproofs of the Inter-connectivity inside our brain (with its 170000 km of nerve fibers 86billion neurons 1014 synapses) and the deepest layer of reality consciousness

In order to understand the emerging sequences that are forming our ldquorealityrdquo we need theillusion (creality) 14 of time Time is the illusion that our consciousness is creating byprocessing and interpreting all sorts of information received by our five senses andrepresented in the brain by the electrical and quantum activity in neurons

The details of this representation called neural coding remain however mysterious Thequestion is how pulses (bits) of electricity get translated into thoughts and ideas (Phasetransition may explain how brain neurons encode information In neural coding the neuronsgenerate electric pulses or action potentials to encode information and communicate witheach other wwwarxivorgabs12066129 (20) At this stage information and communicationare taking place between neurons who seem to be ordering and processing this information sothat the ldquohuman consciousness beingrdquo can realize thoughts and become ldquoawarerdquo

The question then rises Are these neurons conscious Are they ordering via neural codingour future thoughts Or is our non-causal consciousness already creating our future resultingin a time-line that is the origin of the emerging of causal awareness

In my essay The Consciousness Connection 12 I indicated that the processing time fromentering data to the conscious awareness is about 200 milliseconds The question rises if theconscious observer who is the cause of the ldquocollapse of the wave functionrdquo is effectivelyrealizing this collapse about 200 milliseconds in the future (before our awareness) In theTotal Simultaneity perception the future is an ENM moment to be touched by our Non-CausalConsciousness so not (yet) existing in a causal time-line That seems ldquospookyrdquo in our CDU( Causal Deterministic Universe) but is explained through TS

A continuation of the research how neurons can encode both digital and analogue informationis established by Nick E Mavramatos who published in 2011 the article ldquoQuantum Coherencein (Brain) Microtubules and Efficient Energy Information transportrdquo (14) where he describedalso the role of Quantum mechanics in Biologyand entanglement at ambient temperatures

(quote)ldquoThe electromagnetic interactions of the dipole moments of the tubulin dimers (moleculeformed by a combination of two smaller (identical) molecules) with the dipole quanta in theordered water interiors of the microtubules play the role of quantum coherent cavity modesrdquo(unquote) (14 from abstract)

Besides of the ldquoData Process Transmission Delay (DPTD see ldquoThe ConsciousnessConnection httpvixraorgabs12110019) 12 that indicates the difference in time in theldquoawarenessrdquo of reality and its conscious ldquoobservationrdquo we are now discovering that also in our

11

ldquobrainsrdquo quantum mechanics andor field theory on dissipation-free energy transfer in (brain)microtubules (ring-shape components involved in maintaining the structure of cells) is playingan important rolerdquo This Quantum Coherence in brain Tubules may be at the origin ofour ldquoentanglementrdquo with the non-causal part of our consciousness in Total Simultaneity

These quantum activities take place before you become aware of having made a decisionYour NCC is ldquopicking uprdquo an ENM in TS that results in a pastfuture Your ldquomaterial brainrdquois only an excitation (of the matter field) catalysed by the consciousness-field the origin ofyour awareness is in TS The conscious observer of the two slit experiment seems to beaffecting the future and so we can understand why it seems that the ldquoparticlerdquo is decidingalready before the slit(s) if it will be or wave or particle or one of states in-between

The question is not if the neuron is conscious andor is censoring our thinking no the processis controlled by our own non-causal consciousness and the emerging thoughts are our ownSo it seems that our REALFREEWILL is not residing in our causal Creation of theuniverse but in the non-causal infinity Our emerging Causal Consciousness is the result ofthe contact of quantum activity within the micro-tubules of our brains and Total Simultaneitywe could say that this is a form of Quantum Consciousness

One of the possibilities to enhance our senses maybe the use of future ldquoquantum computersrdquowho may allow us the extension of our consciousness The ldquoqubitsrdquo (unit of quantuminformation) superimposed state is comparable with the infinite possibilities of timelife-linesin the basket of TS For 1000 qubits we will have 21000 possible configurations (10300) whichis more as all the atoms in our universe so you can stock 10300 solutions for a problem Thisdoes not only mean that every question can be answered but maybe every question is alreadyanswered the moment we achieved this quantum-state even putting it on power may not benecessary

We argue that all our material (biological and non-biological) ldquocreationsrdquo will only be TOOLSfor our causal consciousness which is emergent from its ldquobiologicrdquo appearance (illusion) From this illusion of matter including the materialistic illusion of ourselves can also emergea new consciousness (so not only possible in the biologic way) This form of newly createdconsciousnessintelligence is through our own causal consciousness entangled with TotalSimultaneity This means that our non-causal part of consciousness is at the origin of thisldquoappearancerdquo of NEW consciousness it is one of the infinite ldquoavailabilitiesrdquo TheTRIANGLE is realised

This new approach will make it possible to create parallel time and parallel consciousnessand ldquoenterrdquo new dimension(s) that may reside behind the Wall of Planck

5 Time-Travel Becomes ldquoETERNAL -NOW- MOMENT HOPPINGrdquo

The splitting in the original Many Worlds Interpretation goes only forward in time notbackwards In our conception it IS possible that our consciousness activates Eternal NowMoments from other timelife-lines (or from parallel available universes) Should this meanthat time travel is possible Yes butshould we call this phenomenon time-travel

What we are understanding as time-travel in this causal timelife line always leads to the well-known paradoxes like killing your grand-father (What a mentality ) These paradoxeshowever are no longer problematic when we apply the perception of Total Simultaneity Then

12

time-travel in the past andor the future would become ENM-Hopping and the so calledldquophysicalrdquo timelife-line (in our memory) continues normally Our consciousness is able notonly to hop from one ENM to another but also line up these ENMrsquos and in this way creatingfor itself the best possible past and future Real Free Will resides in TS

The extension of our Free Will lies in the extension of our consciousness and so in a closercontact with our NCC in order to realize more choices in the ENM availabilities We thinkthat the a future coupling of the quantum-computer and our brain will be an opening

In the article ldquoQuantum Coherence in Brain Microtubulesrdquo 16Prof Nick E Mavromatosproposed that

quote

ldquoFor the first time there is concrete evidence for quantum entanglement over relatively largedistances in living matter at ambient temperature which suggests a rather non-trivial role ofquantum physics in path optimization for energy and information transportrdquo (httpiopscienceioporg1742-65963291012026) (14)

unquote

It becomes clear that quantum entanglement and de-coherence time which are for theconstruction and the operational qualities of quantum computers the main issues thesequalities are already available in our own brains inside the Cell Microtubules (MT)(de-coherence = The particles that make up a computer interact with surroundings so thatinformation is spreading out which means this effect is spoiling quantum computations (todecohere = lose their quantum properties))

Regarding the ldquomacroscopicrdquo aspect Recent experiments on atoms in salt crystals haveshown that an amount of 1020 atoms formed a hugely entangled state Vlatko Vedral inldquoLiving in a Quantum Worldrdquo (Scientific American June 2011) and ldquoProgress ArticleQuantifying entanglement in Macroscopic Systemsrdquo (June 2008 Nature 453 1004-1007 httpwwwnaturecomnaturejournalv453n7198fullnature07124html (21)Quantum BitStorage is advancing not only in the macroscopic way but now also scientists have succeededto retrieve coherent information for extended times (39 minutes) at room-temperature SeeKamyar Saeedi et al in ldquoRoom-Temperature Quantum Bit Storage Exceeding 39 MinutesUsing Ionized Donors in Silicon-28rdquo httpwwwsciencemagorgcontent3426160830 (22)

Our brains are RWA (Ready Willing and Able) to perform quantum states that when broughtin coherence with a quantum computer This will enable us to realize ldquoENM-Hoppingrdquo

13

Figure 4 the Construction of an ENM-HopperTime-machine

When we are regarding the quantum computer as proposed before with 1000 qubits we seethat in organizing such a ldquomachinerdquo we have to be able to control the ldquode-coherencerdquo May bewe solve this de-coherence problem by using the ldquotechniquerdquo that the Microtubules areapplying inside our brains or we can realize the 103 dimensional solution (see page 9) whichis direct contact with TS and needs only ONE particle If we could arrange one of thoseexperiments the next step would be to create an entanglement between the ldquocellsrdquo of theQuantum-computer and the Microtubules of our brains The 10300 answers residing in theQuantum Computer would then direct be ldquoavailablerdquo for our Brain We saw already that wedid even need not to put the quantum computer ldquoonrdquo it is like entanglement an immediateprocess without ldquoprocessing timerdquo

By combining the same kind of technique as our microtubules are using namely Ca2+ ionsand applying for example the the technique to entangle salt crystals and maybe Ca2+ ions in aquantum computer we would be able to establish an entanglement between these Ca2+ ionsin the brain and in the computer Of course there are still a lot of problems to be resolvedThe salt crystals were reaching entanglement by using a specific magnetic field so the brainand the quantum device should be both in the same magnetic field a field which has not todamage the brain

Once we should have realized this ldquounificationrdquo with the quantum computer we as humanbeings would have direct available the 10300 answers because they are ldquoavailabilitiesrdquo in thequantum computer These are the same kind of availabilities as those in Total Simultaneityso the path would be open to a broader ldquoaccessrdquo of our non-causal consciousness

This means that we could ldquoHOPrdquo to other Eternal Now Moments also those who seem to bein the past andor future of our actual timelife-line we then have extended the range of ourFree Will

14

15 Conclusion

Reality is a sequence of memories lined up through our brains with help of our CausalConsciousness (CC) Memories are the string of Eternal Now Moments (ENMrsquos) resulting inthe ldquoIrdquo experience These ENMrsquos originate from our Non-Causal part of Consciousness (NCC)that resides in Total Simultaneity (TS) Our CC and NCC are entangled emergencies togetherthey are the creators of our TimeLife-Lines giving us the illusion of the experience of mattertime and space By deepening our knowledge of the Consciousness Field and the search forthe essence of the Matter-Field illusion that we are aware of as reality we will be able totighten the contact wit Total Simultaneity and have more control of the choice for ENMrsquos tobe ldquotouchedrdquo by our NCC and between the infinity of ldquoIrsquosrdquo that are available there We willbecome more conscious and be able to become ENM-Hoppers instead of the prisoners in theuncontrollable voyage we have to undertake by now

Quantum Physics is showing us already the first indications of a non-materialistic non-algorithmic reality objects merge to thingness and further abstraction The influence ofconscious observation in the double slit experiment entanglement between particles theworm holes physicists are imagining between these entangled particles the wormholesbetween Black Holes all of them are indications for a perception of Total Simultaneity

Another but technical way to come to a deeper understanding of consciousness is therealization of a non-algorithmic Quantum Computer Through this development we will beable to create another form of intelligenceconsciousness This intelligence will be able tocommunicate with us perhaps in a timeless way Translating this new senses in order to makethem more comprehensible to our own five senses could give clearness about problems thatwe would never be able to solve or observe The development of this new form ofintelligenceconsciousness is only one of the availabilities in Total Simultaneity We can bringour own causal consciousness nearer to its non-causal (caused) part and in the end being ableto escape this causal timelife line not only by dying in the temporal way

The one Eternal Now moment that you became conscious of 150 milliseconds ago is just oneof an infinity of ENMrsquos (apples) in the basket but it is THE moment we shared together inour perception and creation of the image of THIS reality It is from each (Planck)moment onthat we have to use our Free Will in Total Simultaneity Let us try together to make the rightchoices and prepare for the promised Eternal Conscious

Wilhelmus de WildeMontrouveau FranceAugust 2014

15

REFERENCES

1 Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz 1710 ldquoEssays on the Goodness of God the Freedom of Man and theOrigin of Evilrdquo2 Wilhelmus de Wilde 06-12-2011 ldquoREALITIES OUT OF TOTAL SIMULTANEITYrdquowwwvixraorgabs111200133 Sean Carroll(Caltech) at a lecture for ldquoThe Fermilab Users Meeting 2013 ldquoParticles Fields and theFuture of Physics (11-07-2013) wwwyoutubecomwatchv=gEKSpZPByDOampfeature=youtube 4 E Megidish A Halevy T Shacham T Dvir L Dovrat and HS Eisenberg (Experimenters fromthe Racah Institute of Physics Hebrew University of Jerusalem) Entanglement Swapping betweenldquoPhotons have never Coexisted rdquohttpjournalsapsorgprlabstract101103PhysRevLett1102104035 JM Kovac et al ldquoDetection Of B-Mode Polarization at Degree Angular Statesrdquo 17 March 2014 lastrevised 18 march 2014 version V2 wwwarxivorggtastro-phgtarXiv14033985 andhttpbicepkeckorg (BICEP2 website)6 Julian Sonner 20-11-2013 ldquoHolographic Schwinger Effect and the Geometry of EntanglementrdquowwwprlapsorgabstractPRLv111i21e211603 and ldquoCreation of entanglement simultaneously givesrise to a wormholerdquo httpphysorgnews2013-12-creation-entanglement-simultaneously-wormholehtml7 SW Hawking DAMPT University of Cambridge UK ldquoInformation Preservation and WeatherForecasting for Black Holesrdquo wwwarxivorgabs140157618 James B Hartle SW Hawking Thomas Hertog Accelerated Expansion from Negative Λwwwarxivorgabs12053807 30 may 20129 Chuang-Feng Li et al ldquoRealization of QuantumWheelerrsquos Deelayed-Choice Experimentrdquopublished 19-08-2012 in Nature Photonics 6 600-604wwwnaturecomnphotonjournalv6n9fullnphoton2012179html10 Hans Christian von Bayer ldquoQuantum Weirdness It is all in your mindrdquo Scientific American 30846-51 (2013) wwwnaturecomscientificamericanjournalv308n6fullscientificamerican0613-46html published on line 14 may 201311 wwwenwikipediaorgwikiBloch_sphere (last modified 15-01-2014)12 Wilhelmus de Wilde 05-11-2012 ldquoThe Consciousness Connectionrdquohttpvixraorgabs1211001913 Sir Roger Penrose in foreword (March 2007) to ldquoQuantumAspects of Liferdquo (2008) by Derk Abott14 Nick E Mavromatos 2011 ldquoQuantum Coherence in (Brain) Microtubules and Efficient Energyand Information transportrdquo httpiopscienceioporg1742-6596329101202615 Aristotle Book 8 of ldquothe Physicsrdquo and Book 12 of ldquothe Metaphysicsrdquo16 Anton Zeilinger et al ldquoGeneration and Confirmation of a (100x100)-dimensional entangledQuantum Systemrdquo last revised 21 March 2014 wwwarxivorgabs1306009617 Andrei Linde wwwstanfordedu~alinde18 Juan Maldacena and Leonard Susskind 11-01-2013 ldquoCool Horizons for Entangled black Holesrdquowwwarxivorgpdf13060533pdf19 Carlo Rovelli and Francesca Vidotto 08-02-2014 ldquoPLANCK STARSrdquowwwarxivorgabs1401656220 Thibaud Taillefumier amp Marcelo O Magnasco ldquoA Phase Transition in the First passage of aBrownian Process through a fluctuating boundry implications for Neural Codingrdquo 26 June 2012httparxivorgabs1206612921 Vlatko Vedral ldquoProgress Article Quantifying entanglement in Macroscopic Systemsrdquo (june 2008Nature 453 1004-1007 httpwwwnaturecomnaturejournalv453n7198fullnature07124html22 Wilhelmus de Wilde 18-06-2013 ldquoTHE QUEST FOR THE PRIMAL SEQUENCErdquohttpfqxiorgcommunityforumtopic1810

4

Bang Inflation double slit experiment and Black Holes The recipe for this new perception is

Throw ALL information (of the past and the future) of ALL the universes together in onebasket (also the ones that in our perception are impossible universes with differentfundamental constants and those that can only be reached by different senses as ours) Stir and Shake this up to ONE non-causal unity (yes it seems like chaos but a good mixgives the best taste) In this basket there are not ldquorealizedrdquo realitiesrdquo but ldquoavailabilitiesrdquo Availabilities of ALLand every form and time of any universe we even cannot name this availabilitiesldquoinformationrdquo because information is a sequence so causal It is of course impossible to rdquodescriberdquo in our causal deterministic way these points ofldquoreality availabilitiesrdquo (or apples in the basket or when the apples are singularities also thebasket is a singularity) eventually we can compare it to all the slices of all ldquoblock-universesrdquo(slices with no subjective flow of time) together as non-realized causal realities

Figure 1

These slices on their turn can be imagined as constituted of ldquoEternal Now Momentsrdquo(ENMrsquos) each ENM is UNIQUE singularities that ldquogrowrdquo (become four dimensional so theENM in TS is like a hologram) to attain the ldquowidthrdquo of a Planck lengthtime in causal realityWhy the Planck length and time Because they are the limits of our causal universe godeeper and there is no longer before or after no causality no time no space This means that Total Simultaneity can be reached at the edge of the Wall of Planck (Plancklength(lp) 1616252 x 10-35m and the Planck time 539121 x 10-44s) so EVERYWHEREaround and inside our four-dimensional causal universe(see also wwwvixraorgabs11120013 ) (2)

But how are we able to experience reality What is the entity that enables Time and Space Are we in control of our reality

Answer Our consciousness is THE essential ldquotoolrdquo in creating the causal (with the arrow oftime) reality that we are aware of We argue that our consciousness is a constituted of twoentangled parts the causal part and the non-causal part (CC and NCC) Causalconsciousness stretches out into the basket of Total Simultaneity where it becomes non-

5

causal this ldquonon-causalcausal connectionrdquo can be imagined as entanglement-like andtimeless (eternal)

In the basket of Total Simultaneity our non-causal consciousness has the CHOICE betweenthe infinity of availabilities of ENMrsquos Our Causal Consciousness in this reality perception isthe centre of a sphere we are calling the Subjective Simultaneity Sphere (SSS) On thesurface of this sphere arrive ALL the signals from the specific Eternal Now Moment Thesesignals are to be processed by our senses and brain so reforming the NOW to a PAST andbecome memory

TSrarr ENMrarr NCCrarr CCrarr SSSrarr5 Sensesrarr Observed Realityrarr Memory rarr Past

The consequence of this perception is that the eternal NOW moment of a specific life-line thatseem unique for us is just one of an infinity of life-lines that you are able to ldquoliverdquo in otherldquoavailablerdquo universes An infinite amount of unique ldquoYOUsrdquo is ldquoavailablerdquo eternallyYour causal birth and dying in this timelife line is just one of an infinity your non-causalconsciousness is eternally and timeless wandering (like a field) between these endlessavailabilities of all pasts and futures that are possible (non-material non -realized) realitiesNon-caused Consciousness can be compared with a Field that becomes like the philosophicalconcept described by Aristotle it moves all other things but it is not moved itself by any prioraction and is called ldquoUNMOVED MOVERrdquo (15)

The infinite availability of YOUrsquos does not mean that the understanding of your present life-line creation is not important because it is your actual (in Vito) reality and our actualstarting point of the quest where we will see that even matter does not matter

Quantum Mechanics changed already our insights Matter consists no longer of tiny ldquoballsrdquoThe matter we are seemingly consisting of is ldquoFIELDrdquo (Sean Carroll in lecture at Fermilabwwwsymmetrymagazineorgarticlejuly-2013real-talk-everything-is-made-of-fields) (3)Weare proposing ONE field for all matter the Matter Field that is coupled to the ConsciousnessField Imagine that this consciousness field acts as a catalyst on the ldquoMatter Fieldrdquo and so it isthe origin of ldquoexcitationsrdquo in the matter fieldresulting in momentary observed (illusionary)ldquoparticlesrdquo The moment the particle is ldquoexcited ldquo however it is already history in theperceived time-line because it exists only for the length of a Planck-time (quantum fluctuation)I know that the word ldquoIllusionrdquo has a poor meaning so I should prefer the word ldquoCrealityrdquo acombination of Creation and Reality

It is even possible that the matter-field does not need the excitation of the particle to arise theproperties of a particle The ldquopropertyrdquo as excitation can arise without the particle Anindication for this is the article about a quantum link created between ldquoPhotons that donrsquotexist at the same timerdquo from experimenters from the Racah Institute of Physics HebrewUniversity of Jerusalem who have entangled two photons that donrsquot even exist at the sametime httpjournalsapsorgprlabstract101103PhysRevLett110210403(4) The samecould be true for mass the property ldquomassrdquo can be there without being coupled to a particle(Could this be an explanation of Dark Matter and the Dark Force )

2 The Baffling Beginnings (BBrsquos)

The simple to be accepted Truth is that we still know so little about any origin of our and

6

other universes that there is not any theory or observation which gives a conclusiveexplanation of reality

Because we are always thinking back in a causal deterministic way where every effect musthave a single cause we are inclined to reductio ad absurdum we seem to be obliged to go onthinking until we reach a point ZEROand so have accepted to call that the Big Bangfollowed by ldquoinflationrdquo where between 10-33 and 10-32 sec the universe was blown up by afactor 1025 Gravitational waves from this inflation generate a faint but distinctive twistingpattern in the polarization of the Cosmic Microwave Background which has the sametemperature everywhere to within 00003degC The ldquoevennessrdquo of the ldquovisiblerdquo universe seemsstrange because it is also valid for regions of the visible sky that are too far away for light orinformation (accepting that the maximum speed of light is c (299792458 msec)) to havetraveled between them Through inflation this problem seems to be solved

Inflation gave also birth to the ldquoMultiverserdquo perceptions because infinite inflation would bethe origin of other ldquoBubblerdquo universes (Stanford University Andrei Linde wwwstanfordedu~alinde )(17)Quantum fluctuations produce rapidly expanding parts of theuniverse This process makes the universe ldquoimmortalrdquo and transforms it into a multiverse ahuge fractal consisting of many exponentially large parts each with different laws of physicsIf we combine this assumption of quantum fluctuations with the assumption of excitationsoriginating from the Consciousness-Field the origin of our own universe lies as one ofinfinite ldquoavailabilitiesrdquo in TS and the infinite amount of different YOUrsquos is the origin of allthese different Universes

We could think about Universes with different physical laws invisible for us but havinginfluence on our own universe and be responsible for the twisting pattern in the polarizationof the CMB It could even be possible that these Universes are responsible for the so calleddark matter deviations that we are observing because our NCC Field is also in touch withthese other ENMrsquos that could lead to these realities our CC is getting ldquofractional imagesrdquo ofthese realities (particles pop in and out of existence)

Of course the Big Bang perception and all the forms of Inflation are ldquoavailabilitiesrdquo in TotalSimultaneity The words Creation of ldquoSomethingrdquo from ldquoNothingrdquo is coupled back to thelining up of ldquoavailabilitiesrdquo by our consciousness which is a non-material perception Butalso we can imagine a Universe where expansion and contraction are following upsequentially and where this contraction never has to arrive at a zero point to a void ofldquonothingrdquo Even the conception of Andrei Linde with the eternal universes does not need afirst cause or Big Beginning but every Beginning is ldquoBafflingrdquo

The Conscious-Field could be very useful for many other practical predictions on theconsequences that arise from this theoretical approach like ldquoimmediate being togetherrdquo inentanglement and Black Holes

2 ENTANGLEMENT and BLACK HOLES

Leonardo da Vinci wrote already ldquoRealize that everything connects to everything else ldquo

The perception of ldquoimmediaterdquo being together is accepted in entanglement(pairs or groups ofparticles ldquointeractrdquo immediate no matter at what distance) Even when a particle is thousandsof light-years away from his counterpart it immediately reacts when the other one is measured

7

or observed This phenomenon can in our vision be applied to the whole ldquovisiblerdquo createduniverse so that everything is always interconnected with everything else

In the case of entanglement scientists now are proposing a ldquowormholerdquo (a kind of tunnel inspace-time that can connect two widely or close separated regions of the universe) as ahypothetical short-cut through the universe see Julian Sonner in ldquoHolographic SchwingerEffect and the Geometry of Entanglementrdquo wwwprlapsorgabstractPRLv111i21e211603(6)

The same ideas are brought up for Black Holes by Juan Maldacena and Leonard SusskindldquoCool Horizons for Entangled black Holesrdquo wwwarxivorgpdf13060533pdf (18) They showhow a pair of black holes could be coupled with a wormhole strung between them so theybecome ldquoentangledrdquo black holes

That the core of Black Holes is NOT a singularity is a view which is also shared by CarloRovelli and Francesca Vidotto They propose that the object emerging at the end of theHawking Evaporation of a black hole can be larger then the Planckian by a factor (mmP)n() where m is the mass fallen into the hole mP is the Plack mass and n is positive The coreof the black hole has become the structure known as a Planck Star and the information fallenin it is not lost (wwwarxivorgabs14016562 )(19)

That information is not lost is also the opinion of Stephen Hawking in his latest paperldquoInformation Preservation and Weather Forecasting for Black Holesrdquowwwarxivorgabs14015761 (7) He proposes that Black Holes have no longer ldquoEvent-Horizonsrdquo that arise at the gravitational collapse but that ldquochaosrdquo is at the essence of theBlack Hole As our perception assumes that the entrance of TS is not only at the Planck lengthresiding at the ldquocorerdquo but everywhere in spacetime the information entering such a BH willalso never be lost because it stays the ENM and so remains eternally available in TotalSimultaneity

We argue that these so called ldquoentangled worm-holesrdquo black hole wormholesrdquo ldquoPlanck starsrdquoand Different Black Hole Horizons from Hawking are all one and the same discussion Ourcreated reality is limited by the Planck scale and from there on it may be in a black hole aPlanck star a Big Bang or a pair of entangled particles after this limit we always arereaching the non causal ldquodimensionrdquo called Total Simultaneity This ldquoareardquo is interconnectingevery space and time of our universe (and others) The essence is that NO information willEVER be lost but always is staying ldquoavailablerdquo in TS for our NCC (Consciousness Field)i theform of ENMrsquos

This omnipresent Consciousness Field is also the reason of the astonishing ldquoevennessrdquo of ourCausal Deterministic Universe When once we can control the entrance into this ldquodimensionrdquowe will be able to be at any place and any time in any universe instantaneously This of courseis not time-travel in the deterministic way but a far more spiritual goal

Another theory that is paving the way for a Total Simultaneity-like perception is the The HAWKING HARTLE ldquoNo -Boundary Interpretationrdquo The creation of our universe asintroduced by Hawking-Hartle is at one side (the past) touching our Total Simultaneityperception when they are saying

The Big Bang needs no longer being the beginning of time in a singularity as proposed inthe standard inflationary cosmology but a timeless point where the universe -or rather a

8

superposition of all possible universes - pops into existence from nothing with all its laws ofphysics intactJames B Hartle SW Hawking Thomas Hertog Accelerated Expansion from Negative Λwwwarxivorgabs12053807 30 may 2012 (8)

However the HawkingHartle interpretation places the lines of all possible histories of ourCausal Deterministic Universe (CDU) after a point of creation the Big Bang that is regardedas a timeless point in our CDU This time-less point is in our perception just one of theinfinite ENMrsquos in TS between these points there are an infinite number of PASTSANDFUTURES available not only the pasts to ONE POINT

figure 2 figure 3

Both Hawking-Hartle Interpretation (HHI) and Total Simultaneity are giving the indication ofan infinity of time-lines the HHI only in the past and TS in the past and the future HHIindicates two extremitieslimits the BB and our actual NOW with in-between like in aFeynman Diagram ALL possible ways of arriving at a special place TS expands this viewand only takes one of an eternal amount of Eternal Now Moments at the centre of an infinityof pasts AND of futures (The α-P in fig3 is only one of an infinity of available points on thesphere) This indicates that two extremes are not the only choices we are able to makeBetween any two extremes there are

3 An Infinite Amount of Tones of Grey

Sir Roger Penrose rdquoDoes life in some way make use of the potentiality for vast quantumsuperpositions as would be required for serious quantum computationrdquo (Foreword(March 2007) to Quantum Aspects of Life (2008) by Derek Abott) (13)

Let us go back from the scale of the Universe to the scale of particles When we thoughtbefore that conscious observation just resulted direct in a particle (collapse of the wavefunction) new experiments however indicate that the particle side and the wave side ofphysical reality are both just a black and white (digital) representation that is not complete wwwnaturecomnphotonjournalv6n9fullnphoton2012179html (9)We thought until nowthat these two extremes were the only two possibilities But between this black and whiteextremities there exists an infinity number of ldquoGrey Tonesrdquo (for example it can be 43particle and 57 wave and any percentage in-between)

This also means that the properties of an (observed) particle can fade away like in the evening

9

light is diminishing so our observations of mass energy and spin from what we measure as100 particle are not the extremities of those properties there are more states availableThestate we become conscious of is just ne of the infinite possibilities of observable reality

When we apply this theory to the so called ldquosuperpositionrdquo of quantum states where isassumed that the two extremities are ldquosuperposedrdquo meaning both present This should alsomean that ALL the states in-between those extremities are ldquopresentrdquo (better ldquoavailablerdquo)Schroumldingers cat is not both alive and dead but or alive or dead or every state in-between

AResearch team directed from the Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information ofthe Austrian Academy of Sciences and with the participation from the Universitat Autonomade Barcelona directed by Anton Zeilinger wwwarxivorgabs13060096 (16) have managed tocreate an entanglement of 103 dimensions with only TWO photons The ldquouserdquo of 103dimensions is comparable to the ldquouserdquo of all the grey tones in-between We are in this wayusing already the grey-tones to ac Measuring the state of ONE of the entangled photons(whether they are in one place or another or spinning one way or another) affects the state ofthe other photon instantly only we are now able to influence 101 photons in 103 dimensionsthat are in superposition When comparing this results to the Schrodingers Cat it could bealive or dead or in 101 other states simultaneously These 103 dimensions can be consideredas availabilities in Total Simultaneity

The parallel between the comparison of a binary ldquorealityrdquo and the qubit way where the shadesof grey are represented by the vectors of the Bloch sphere (geometrical representation of thepure state space of a two-level quantum mechanical system (qubit) named after the physicistsFelix Bloch) (11) is evident The reality creation is not only ldquoyes or nordquo or ldquoblack and whiterdquoOur consciousness is creating out of all available shades of grey of the ENM a Reality theldquoapparitionrdquo (illusion creality) of a materialistic universe

The infinity of grey tones of reality also include the parallel universes in between these twoextremities of WaveParticle It might be that the grey tones also are at the origin of DarkMatter Every history is a form of explanation of the ldquonowrdquo experience It is for nowuntouchable but may and will be rewritten ldquorecreatedrdquo when we are going to expand thecontrol of consciousness We will then be able to observe the three-dimensional object that isthe origin from the two-dimensional shadow

Once we reach the causal length and time limit of our universe it is no longer possible toldquodividerdquo any further we are trespassing our ldquoCrealityrdquo and entering the origin of the shadowsthrown on the walls of Platorsquos cave A shadow is non-material a result of cooperation betweenthe light and the ldquoreal thingrdquo The light can be compared with our non-causal consciousnessthat passes the ldquooriginrdquo (the ENMalpha-point in Total Simultaneity see ldquoThe ConsciousnessConnectionrdquo httpvixraorgabs12110019 ) (12) and so creates one of the shadow realities forour causal consciousness

ConsciousnessIntelligence can not be realized just by black and white thinking and bycreating machines that are working on algorithmrsquos An ldquoalgorithmrdquo indicates a step-by-stepoperation beginning with an initial state and input followed by instructions describing thecomputations to realize till an output is reached Each step in this process is always betweentwo extremes (in computation for example zero and one) the infinite tones of gray are notinvolved This is the reason why intelligence nor consciousness can emerge from thisprocess

10

Are we able to create ldquointelligencerdquo that will lead to consciousness Therefore we have tounderstand the processes in our brain leading to intelligenceconsciousness one of theseprocesses is the so called Neural Coding

4 NEURALCODING orthe contact with our future past

In the ldquorealityrdquo layer where our body and our brain are created by consciousness we can findproofs of the Inter-connectivity inside our brain (with its 170000 km of nerve fibers 86billion neurons 1014 synapses) and the deepest layer of reality consciousness

In order to understand the emerging sequences that are forming our ldquorealityrdquo we need theillusion (creality) 14 of time Time is the illusion that our consciousness is creating byprocessing and interpreting all sorts of information received by our five senses andrepresented in the brain by the electrical and quantum activity in neurons

The details of this representation called neural coding remain however mysterious Thequestion is how pulses (bits) of electricity get translated into thoughts and ideas (Phasetransition may explain how brain neurons encode information In neural coding the neuronsgenerate electric pulses or action potentials to encode information and communicate witheach other wwwarxivorgabs12066129 (20) At this stage information and communicationare taking place between neurons who seem to be ordering and processing this information sothat the ldquohuman consciousness beingrdquo can realize thoughts and become ldquoawarerdquo

The question then rises Are these neurons conscious Are they ordering via neural codingour future thoughts Or is our non-causal consciousness already creating our future resultingin a time-line that is the origin of the emerging of causal awareness

In my essay The Consciousness Connection 12 I indicated that the processing time fromentering data to the conscious awareness is about 200 milliseconds The question rises if theconscious observer who is the cause of the ldquocollapse of the wave functionrdquo is effectivelyrealizing this collapse about 200 milliseconds in the future (before our awareness) In theTotal Simultaneity perception the future is an ENM moment to be touched by our Non-CausalConsciousness so not (yet) existing in a causal time-line That seems ldquospookyrdquo in our CDU( Causal Deterministic Universe) but is explained through TS

A continuation of the research how neurons can encode both digital and analogue informationis established by Nick E Mavramatos who published in 2011 the article ldquoQuantum Coherencein (Brain) Microtubules and Efficient Energy Information transportrdquo (14) where he describedalso the role of Quantum mechanics in Biologyand entanglement at ambient temperatures

(quote)ldquoThe electromagnetic interactions of the dipole moments of the tubulin dimers (moleculeformed by a combination of two smaller (identical) molecules) with the dipole quanta in theordered water interiors of the microtubules play the role of quantum coherent cavity modesrdquo(unquote) (14 from abstract)

Besides of the ldquoData Process Transmission Delay (DPTD see ldquoThe ConsciousnessConnection httpvixraorgabs12110019) 12 that indicates the difference in time in theldquoawarenessrdquo of reality and its conscious ldquoobservationrdquo we are now discovering that also in our

11

ldquobrainsrdquo quantum mechanics andor field theory on dissipation-free energy transfer in (brain)microtubules (ring-shape components involved in maintaining the structure of cells) is playingan important rolerdquo This Quantum Coherence in brain Tubules may be at the origin ofour ldquoentanglementrdquo with the non-causal part of our consciousness in Total Simultaneity

These quantum activities take place before you become aware of having made a decisionYour NCC is ldquopicking uprdquo an ENM in TS that results in a pastfuture Your ldquomaterial brainrdquois only an excitation (of the matter field) catalysed by the consciousness-field the origin ofyour awareness is in TS The conscious observer of the two slit experiment seems to beaffecting the future and so we can understand why it seems that the ldquoparticlerdquo is decidingalready before the slit(s) if it will be or wave or particle or one of states in-between

The question is not if the neuron is conscious andor is censoring our thinking no the processis controlled by our own non-causal consciousness and the emerging thoughts are our ownSo it seems that our REALFREEWILL is not residing in our causal Creation of theuniverse but in the non-causal infinity Our emerging Causal Consciousness is the result ofthe contact of quantum activity within the micro-tubules of our brains and Total Simultaneitywe could say that this is a form of Quantum Consciousness

One of the possibilities to enhance our senses maybe the use of future ldquoquantum computersrdquowho may allow us the extension of our consciousness The ldquoqubitsrdquo (unit of quantuminformation) superimposed state is comparable with the infinite possibilities of timelife-linesin the basket of TS For 1000 qubits we will have 21000 possible configurations (10300) whichis more as all the atoms in our universe so you can stock 10300 solutions for a problem Thisdoes not only mean that every question can be answered but maybe every question is alreadyanswered the moment we achieved this quantum-state even putting it on power may not benecessary

We argue that all our material (biological and non-biological) ldquocreationsrdquo will only be TOOLSfor our causal consciousness which is emergent from its ldquobiologicrdquo appearance (illusion) From this illusion of matter including the materialistic illusion of ourselves can also emergea new consciousness (so not only possible in the biologic way) This form of newly createdconsciousnessintelligence is through our own causal consciousness entangled with TotalSimultaneity This means that our non-causal part of consciousness is at the origin of thisldquoappearancerdquo of NEW consciousness it is one of the infinite ldquoavailabilitiesrdquo TheTRIANGLE is realised

This new approach will make it possible to create parallel time and parallel consciousnessand ldquoenterrdquo new dimension(s) that may reside behind the Wall of Planck

5 Time-Travel Becomes ldquoETERNAL -NOW- MOMENT HOPPINGrdquo

The splitting in the original Many Worlds Interpretation goes only forward in time notbackwards In our conception it IS possible that our consciousness activates Eternal NowMoments from other timelife-lines (or from parallel available universes) Should this meanthat time travel is possible Yes butshould we call this phenomenon time-travel

What we are understanding as time-travel in this causal timelife line always leads to the well-known paradoxes like killing your grand-father (What a mentality ) These paradoxeshowever are no longer problematic when we apply the perception of Total Simultaneity Then

12

time-travel in the past andor the future would become ENM-Hopping and the so calledldquophysicalrdquo timelife-line (in our memory) continues normally Our consciousness is able notonly to hop from one ENM to another but also line up these ENMrsquos and in this way creatingfor itself the best possible past and future Real Free Will resides in TS

The extension of our Free Will lies in the extension of our consciousness and so in a closercontact with our NCC in order to realize more choices in the ENM availabilities We thinkthat the a future coupling of the quantum-computer and our brain will be an opening

In the article ldquoQuantum Coherence in Brain Microtubulesrdquo 16Prof Nick E Mavromatosproposed that

quote

ldquoFor the first time there is concrete evidence for quantum entanglement over relatively largedistances in living matter at ambient temperature which suggests a rather non-trivial role ofquantum physics in path optimization for energy and information transportrdquo (httpiopscienceioporg1742-65963291012026) (14)

unquote

It becomes clear that quantum entanglement and de-coherence time which are for theconstruction and the operational qualities of quantum computers the main issues thesequalities are already available in our own brains inside the Cell Microtubules (MT)(de-coherence = The particles that make up a computer interact with surroundings so thatinformation is spreading out which means this effect is spoiling quantum computations (todecohere = lose their quantum properties))

Regarding the ldquomacroscopicrdquo aspect Recent experiments on atoms in salt crystals haveshown that an amount of 1020 atoms formed a hugely entangled state Vlatko Vedral inldquoLiving in a Quantum Worldrdquo (Scientific American June 2011) and ldquoProgress ArticleQuantifying entanglement in Macroscopic Systemsrdquo (June 2008 Nature 453 1004-1007 httpwwwnaturecomnaturejournalv453n7198fullnature07124html (21)Quantum BitStorage is advancing not only in the macroscopic way but now also scientists have succeededto retrieve coherent information for extended times (39 minutes) at room-temperature SeeKamyar Saeedi et al in ldquoRoom-Temperature Quantum Bit Storage Exceeding 39 MinutesUsing Ionized Donors in Silicon-28rdquo httpwwwsciencemagorgcontent3426160830 (22)

Our brains are RWA (Ready Willing and Able) to perform quantum states that when broughtin coherence with a quantum computer This will enable us to realize ldquoENM-Hoppingrdquo

13

Figure 4 the Construction of an ENM-HopperTime-machine

When we are regarding the quantum computer as proposed before with 1000 qubits we seethat in organizing such a ldquomachinerdquo we have to be able to control the ldquode-coherencerdquo May bewe solve this de-coherence problem by using the ldquotechniquerdquo that the Microtubules areapplying inside our brains or we can realize the 103 dimensional solution (see page 9) whichis direct contact with TS and needs only ONE particle If we could arrange one of thoseexperiments the next step would be to create an entanglement between the ldquocellsrdquo of theQuantum-computer and the Microtubules of our brains The 10300 answers residing in theQuantum Computer would then direct be ldquoavailablerdquo for our Brain We saw already that wedid even need not to put the quantum computer ldquoonrdquo it is like entanglement an immediateprocess without ldquoprocessing timerdquo

By combining the same kind of technique as our microtubules are using namely Ca2+ ionsand applying for example the the technique to entangle salt crystals and maybe Ca2+ ions in aquantum computer we would be able to establish an entanglement between these Ca2+ ionsin the brain and in the computer Of course there are still a lot of problems to be resolvedThe salt crystals were reaching entanglement by using a specific magnetic field so the brainand the quantum device should be both in the same magnetic field a field which has not todamage the brain

Once we should have realized this ldquounificationrdquo with the quantum computer we as humanbeings would have direct available the 10300 answers because they are ldquoavailabilitiesrdquo in thequantum computer These are the same kind of availabilities as those in Total Simultaneityso the path would be open to a broader ldquoaccessrdquo of our non-causal consciousness

This means that we could ldquoHOPrdquo to other Eternal Now Moments also those who seem to bein the past andor future of our actual timelife-line we then have extended the range of ourFree Will

14

15 Conclusion

Reality is a sequence of memories lined up through our brains with help of our CausalConsciousness (CC) Memories are the string of Eternal Now Moments (ENMrsquos) resulting inthe ldquoIrdquo experience These ENMrsquos originate from our Non-Causal part of Consciousness (NCC)that resides in Total Simultaneity (TS) Our CC and NCC are entangled emergencies togetherthey are the creators of our TimeLife-Lines giving us the illusion of the experience of mattertime and space By deepening our knowledge of the Consciousness Field and the search forthe essence of the Matter-Field illusion that we are aware of as reality we will be able totighten the contact wit Total Simultaneity and have more control of the choice for ENMrsquos tobe ldquotouchedrdquo by our NCC and between the infinity of ldquoIrsquosrdquo that are available there We willbecome more conscious and be able to become ENM-Hoppers instead of the prisoners in theuncontrollable voyage we have to undertake by now

Quantum Physics is showing us already the first indications of a non-materialistic non-algorithmic reality objects merge to thingness and further abstraction The influence ofconscious observation in the double slit experiment entanglement between particles theworm holes physicists are imagining between these entangled particles the wormholesbetween Black Holes all of them are indications for a perception of Total Simultaneity

Another but technical way to come to a deeper understanding of consciousness is therealization of a non-algorithmic Quantum Computer Through this development we will beable to create another form of intelligenceconsciousness This intelligence will be able tocommunicate with us perhaps in a timeless way Translating this new senses in order to makethem more comprehensible to our own five senses could give clearness about problems thatwe would never be able to solve or observe The development of this new form ofintelligenceconsciousness is only one of the availabilities in Total Simultaneity We can bringour own causal consciousness nearer to its non-causal (caused) part and in the end being ableto escape this causal timelife line not only by dying in the temporal way

The one Eternal Now moment that you became conscious of 150 milliseconds ago is just oneof an infinity of ENMrsquos (apples) in the basket but it is THE moment we shared together inour perception and creation of the image of THIS reality It is from each (Planck)moment onthat we have to use our Free Will in Total Simultaneity Let us try together to make the rightchoices and prepare for the promised Eternal Conscious

Wilhelmus de WildeMontrouveau FranceAugust 2014

15

REFERENCES

1 Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz 1710 ldquoEssays on the Goodness of God the Freedom of Man and theOrigin of Evilrdquo2 Wilhelmus de Wilde 06-12-2011 ldquoREALITIES OUT OF TOTAL SIMULTANEITYrdquowwwvixraorgabs111200133 Sean Carroll(Caltech) at a lecture for ldquoThe Fermilab Users Meeting 2013 ldquoParticles Fields and theFuture of Physics (11-07-2013) wwwyoutubecomwatchv=gEKSpZPByDOampfeature=youtube 4 E Megidish A Halevy T Shacham T Dvir L Dovrat and HS Eisenberg (Experimenters fromthe Racah Institute of Physics Hebrew University of Jerusalem) Entanglement Swapping betweenldquoPhotons have never Coexisted rdquohttpjournalsapsorgprlabstract101103PhysRevLett1102104035 JM Kovac et al ldquoDetection Of B-Mode Polarization at Degree Angular Statesrdquo 17 March 2014 lastrevised 18 march 2014 version V2 wwwarxivorggtastro-phgtarXiv14033985 andhttpbicepkeckorg (BICEP2 website)6 Julian Sonner 20-11-2013 ldquoHolographic Schwinger Effect and the Geometry of EntanglementrdquowwwprlapsorgabstractPRLv111i21e211603 and ldquoCreation of entanglement simultaneously givesrise to a wormholerdquo httpphysorgnews2013-12-creation-entanglement-simultaneously-wormholehtml7 SW Hawking DAMPT University of Cambridge UK ldquoInformation Preservation and WeatherForecasting for Black Holesrdquo wwwarxivorgabs140157618 James B Hartle SW Hawking Thomas Hertog Accelerated Expansion from Negative Λwwwarxivorgabs12053807 30 may 20129 Chuang-Feng Li et al ldquoRealization of QuantumWheelerrsquos Deelayed-Choice Experimentrdquopublished 19-08-2012 in Nature Photonics 6 600-604wwwnaturecomnphotonjournalv6n9fullnphoton2012179html10 Hans Christian von Bayer ldquoQuantum Weirdness It is all in your mindrdquo Scientific American 30846-51 (2013) wwwnaturecomscientificamericanjournalv308n6fullscientificamerican0613-46html published on line 14 may 201311 wwwenwikipediaorgwikiBloch_sphere (last modified 15-01-2014)12 Wilhelmus de Wilde 05-11-2012 ldquoThe Consciousness Connectionrdquohttpvixraorgabs1211001913 Sir Roger Penrose in foreword (March 2007) to ldquoQuantumAspects of Liferdquo (2008) by Derk Abott14 Nick E Mavromatos 2011 ldquoQuantum Coherence in (Brain) Microtubules and Efficient Energyand Information transportrdquo httpiopscienceioporg1742-6596329101202615 Aristotle Book 8 of ldquothe Physicsrdquo and Book 12 of ldquothe Metaphysicsrdquo16 Anton Zeilinger et al ldquoGeneration and Confirmation of a (100x100)-dimensional entangledQuantum Systemrdquo last revised 21 March 2014 wwwarxivorgabs1306009617 Andrei Linde wwwstanfordedu~alinde18 Juan Maldacena and Leonard Susskind 11-01-2013 ldquoCool Horizons for Entangled black Holesrdquowwwarxivorgpdf13060533pdf19 Carlo Rovelli and Francesca Vidotto 08-02-2014 ldquoPLANCK STARSrdquowwwarxivorgabs1401656220 Thibaud Taillefumier amp Marcelo O Magnasco ldquoA Phase Transition in the First passage of aBrownian Process through a fluctuating boundry implications for Neural Codingrdquo 26 June 2012httparxivorgabs1206612921 Vlatko Vedral ldquoProgress Article Quantifying entanglement in Macroscopic Systemsrdquo (june 2008Nature 453 1004-1007 httpwwwnaturecomnaturejournalv453n7198fullnature07124html22 Wilhelmus de Wilde 18-06-2013 ldquoTHE QUEST FOR THE PRIMAL SEQUENCErdquohttpfqxiorgcommunityforumtopic1810

5

causal this ldquonon-causalcausal connectionrdquo can be imagined as entanglement-like andtimeless (eternal)

In the basket of Total Simultaneity our non-causal consciousness has the CHOICE betweenthe infinity of availabilities of ENMrsquos Our Causal Consciousness in this reality perception isthe centre of a sphere we are calling the Subjective Simultaneity Sphere (SSS) On thesurface of this sphere arrive ALL the signals from the specific Eternal Now Moment Thesesignals are to be processed by our senses and brain so reforming the NOW to a PAST andbecome memory

TSrarr ENMrarr NCCrarr CCrarr SSSrarr5 Sensesrarr Observed Realityrarr Memory rarr Past

The consequence of this perception is that the eternal NOW moment of a specific life-line thatseem unique for us is just one of an infinity of life-lines that you are able to ldquoliverdquo in otherldquoavailablerdquo universes An infinite amount of unique ldquoYOUsrdquo is ldquoavailablerdquo eternallyYour causal birth and dying in this timelife line is just one of an infinity your non-causalconsciousness is eternally and timeless wandering (like a field) between these endlessavailabilities of all pasts and futures that are possible (non-material non -realized) realitiesNon-caused Consciousness can be compared with a Field that becomes like the philosophicalconcept described by Aristotle it moves all other things but it is not moved itself by any prioraction and is called ldquoUNMOVED MOVERrdquo (15)

The infinite availability of YOUrsquos does not mean that the understanding of your present life-line creation is not important because it is your actual (in Vito) reality and our actualstarting point of the quest where we will see that even matter does not matter

Quantum Mechanics changed already our insights Matter consists no longer of tiny ldquoballsrdquoThe matter we are seemingly consisting of is ldquoFIELDrdquo (Sean Carroll in lecture at Fermilabwwwsymmetrymagazineorgarticlejuly-2013real-talk-everything-is-made-of-fields) (3)Weare proposing ONE field for all matter the Matter Field that is coupled to the ConsciousnessField Imagine that this consciousness field acts as a catalyst on the ldquoMatter Fieldrdquo and so it isthe origin of ldquoexcitationsrdquo in the matter fieldresulting in momentary observed (illusionary)ldquoparticlesrdquo The moment the particle is ldquoexcited ldquo however it is already history in theperceived time-line because it exists only for the length of a Planck-time (quantum fluctuation)I know that the word ldquoIllusionrdquo has a poor meaning so I should prefer the word ldquoCrealityrdquo acombination of Creation and Reality

It is even possible that the matter-field does not need the excitation of the particle to arise theproperties of a particle The ldquopropertyrdquo as excitation can arise without the particle Anindication for this is the article about a quantum link created between ldquoPhotons that donrsquotexist at the same timerdquo from experimenters from the Racah Institute of Physics HebrewUniversity of Jerusalem who have entangled two photons that donrsquot even exist at the sametime httpjournalsapsorgprlabstract101103PhysRevLett110210403(4) The samecould be true for mass the property ldquomassrdquo can be there without being coupled to a particle(Could this be an explanation of Dark Matter and the Dark Force )

2 The Baffling Beginnings (BBrsquos)

The simple to be accepted Truth is that we still know so little about any origin of our and

6

other universes that there is not any theory or observation which gives a conclusiveexplanation of reality

Because we are always thinking back in a causal deterministic way where every effect musthave a single cause we are inclined to reductio ad absurdum we seem to be obliged to go onthinking until we reach a point ZEROand so have accepted to call that the Big Bangfollowed by ldquoinflationrdquo where between 10-33 and 10-32 sec the universe was blown up by afactor 1025 Gravitational waves from this inflation generate a faint but distinctive twistingpattern in the polarization of the Cosmic Microwave Background which has the sametemperature everywhere to within 00003degC The ldquoevennessrdquo of the ldquovisiblerdquo universe seemsstrange because it is also valid for regions of the visible sky that are too far away for light orinformation (accepting that the maximum speed of light is c (299792458 msec)) to havetraveled between them Through inflation this problem seems to be solved

Inflation gave also birth to the ldquoMultiverserdquo perceptions because infinite inflation would bethe origin of other ldquoBubblerdquo universes (Stanford University Andrei Linde wwwstanfordedu~alinde )(17)Quantum fluctuations produce rapidly expanding parts of theuniverse This process makes the universe ldquoimmortalrdquo and transforms it into a multiverse ahuge fractal consisting of many exponentially large parts each with different laws of physicsIf we combine this assumption of quantum fluctuations with the assumption of excitationsoriginating from the Consciousness-Field the origin of our own universe lies as one ofinfinite ldquoavailabilitiesrdquo in TS and the infinite amount of different YOUrsquos is the origin of allthese different Universes

We could think about Universes with different physical laws invisible for us but havinginfluence on our own universe and be responsible for the twisting pattern in the polarizationof the CMB It could even be possible that these Universes are responsible for the so calleddark matter deviations that we are observing because our NCC Field is also in touch withthese other ENMrsquos that could lead to these realities our CC is getting ldquofractional imagesrdquo ofthese realities (particles pop in and out of existence)

Of course the Big Bang perception and all the forms of Inflation are ldquoavailabilitiesrdquo in TotalSimultaneity The words Creation of ldquoSomethingrdquo from ldquoNothingrdquo is coupled back to thelining up of ldquoavailabilitiesrdquo by our consciousness which is a non-material perception Butalso we can imagine a Universe where expansion and contraction are following upsequentially and where this contraction never has to arrive at a zero point to a void ofldquonothingrdquo Even the conception of Andrei Linde with the eternal universes does not need afirst cause or Big Beginning but every Beginning is ldquoBafflingrdquo

The Conscious-Field could be very useful for many other practical predictions on theconsequences that arise from this theoretical approach like ldquoimmediate being togetherrdquo inentanglement and Black Holes

2 ENTANGLEMENT and BLACK HOLES

Leonardo da Vinci wrote already ldquoRealize that everything connects to everything else ldquo

The perception of ldquoimmediaterdquo being together is accepted in entanglement(pairs or groups ofparticles ldquointeractrdquo immediate no matter at what distance) Even when a particle is thousandsof light-years away from his counterpart it immediately reacts when the other one is measured

7

or observed This phenomenon can in our vision be applied to the whole ldquovisiblerdquo createduniverse so that everything is always interconnected with everything else

In the case of entanglement scientists now are proposing a ldquowormholerdquo (a kind of tunnel inspace-time that can connect two widely or close separated regions of the universe) as ahypothetical short-cut through the universe see Julian Sonner in ldquoHolographic SchwingerEffect and the Geometry of Entanglementrdquo wwwprlapsorgabstractPRLv111i21e211603(6)

The same ideas are brought up for Black Holes by Juan Maldacena and Leonard SusskindldquoCool Horizons for Entangled black Holesrdquo wwwarxivorgpdf13060533pdf (18) They showhow a pair of black holes could be coupled with a wormhole strung between them so theybecome ldquoentangledrdquo black holes

That the core of Black Holes is NOT a singularity is a view which is also shared by CarloRovelli and Francesca Vidotto They propose that the object emerging at the end of theHawking Evaporation of a black hole can be larger then the Planckian by a factor (mmP)n() where m is the mass fallen into the hole mP is the Plack mass and n is positive The coreof the black hole has become the structure known as a Planck Star and the information fallenin it is not lost (wwwarxivorgabs14016562 )(19)

That information is not lost is also the opinion of Stephen Hawking in his latest paperldquoInformation Preservation and Weather Forecasting for Black Holesrdquowwwarxivorgabs14015761 (7) He proposes that Black Holes have no longer ldquoEvent-Horizonsrdquo that arise at the gravitational collapse but that ldquochaosrdquo is at the essence of theBlack Hole As our perception assumes that the entrance of TS is not only at the Planck lengthresiding at the ldquocorerdquo but everywhere in spacetime the information entering such a BH willalso never be lost because it stays the ENM and so remains eternally available in TotalSimultaneity

We argue that these so called ldquoentangled worm-holesrdquo black hole wormholesrdquo ldquoPlanck starsrdquoand Different Black Hole Horizons from Hawking are all one and the same discussion Ourcreated reality is limited by the Planck scale and from there on it may be in a black hole aPlanck star a Big Bang or a pair of entangled particles after this limit we always arereaching the non causal ldquodimensionrdquo called Total Simultaneity This ldquoareardquo is interconnectingevery space and time of our universe (and others) The essence is that NO information willEVER be lost but always is staying ldquoavailablerdquo in TS for our NCC (Consciousness Field)i theform of ENMrsquos

This omnipresent Consciousness Field is also the reason of the astonishing ldquoevennessrdquo of ourCausal Deterministic Universe When once we can control the entrance into this ldquodimensionrdquowe will be able to be at any place and any time in any universe instantaneously This of courseis not time-travel in the deterministic way but a far more spiritual goal

Another theory that is paving the way for a Total Simultaneity-like perception is the The HAWKING HARTLE ldquoNo -Boundary Interpretationrdquo The creation of our universe asintroduced by Hawking-Hartle is at one side (the past) touching our Total Simultaneityperception when they are saying

The Big Bang needs no longer being the beginning of time in a singularity as proposed inthe standard inflationary cosmology but a timeless point where the universe -or rather a

8

superposition of all possible universes - pops into existence from nothing with all its laws ofphysics intactJames B Hartle SW Hawking Thomas Hertog Accelerated Expansion from Negative Λwwwarxivorgabs12053807 30 may 2012 (8)

However the HawkingHartle interpretation places the lines of all possible histories of ourCausal Deterministic Universe (CDU) after a point of creation the Big Bang that is regardedas a timeless point in our CDU This time-less point is in our perception just one of theinfinite ENMrsquos in TS between these points there are an infinite number of PASTSANDFUTURES available not only the pasts to ONE POINT

figure 2 figure 3

Both Hawking-Hartle Interpretation (HHI) and Total Simultaneity are giving the indication ofan infinity of time-lines the HHI only in the past and TS in the past and the future HHIindicates two extremitieslimits the BB and our actual NOW with in-between like in aFeynman Diagram ALL possible ways of arriving at a special place TS expands this viewand only takes one of an eternal amount of Eternal Now Moments at the centre of an infinityof pasts AND of futures (The α-P in fig3 is only one of an infinity of available points on thesphere) This indicates that two extremes are not the only choices we are able to makeBetween any two extremes there are

3 An Infinite Amount of Tones of Grey

Sir Roger Penrose rdquoDoes life in some way make use of the potentiality for vast quantumsuperpositions as would be required for serious quantum computationrdquo (Foreword(March 2007) to Quantum Aspects of Life (2008) by Derek Abott) (13)

Let us go back from the scale of the Universe to the scale of particles When we thoughtbefore that conscious observation just resulted direct in a particle (collapse of the wavefunction) new experiments however indicate that the particle side and the wave side ofphysical reality are both just a black and white (digital) representation that is not complete wwwnaturecomnphotonjournalv6n9fullnphoton2012179html (9)We thought until nowthat these two extremes were the only two possibilities But between this black and whiteextremities there exists an infinity number of ldquoGrey Tonesrdquo (for example it can be 43particle and 57 wave and any percentage in-between)

This also means that the properties of an (observed) particle can fade away like in the evening

9

light is diminishing so our observations of mass energy and spin from what we measure as100 particle are not the extremities of those properties there are more states availableThestate we become conscious of is just ne of the infinite possibilities of observable reality

When we apply this theory to the so called ldquosuperpositionrdquo of quantum states where isassumed that the two extremities are ldquosuperposedrdquo meaning both present This should alsomean that ALL the states in-between those extremities are ldquopresentrdquo (better ldquoavailablerdquo)Schroumldingers cat is not both alive and dead but or alive or dead or every state in-between

AResearch team directed from the Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information ofthe Austrian Academy of Sciences and with the participation from the Universitat Autonomade Barcelona directed by Anton Zeilinger wwwarxivorgabs13060096 (16) have managed tocreate an entanglement of 103 dimensions with only TWO photons The ldquouserdquo of 103dimensions is comparable to the ldquouserdquo of all the grey tones in-between We are in this wayusing already the grey-tones to ac Measuring the state of ONE of the entangled photons(whether they are in one place or another or spinning one way or another) affects the state ofthe other photon instantly only we are now able to influence 101 photons in 103 dimensionsthat are in superposition When comparing this results to the Schrodingers Cat it could bealive or dead or in 101 other states simultaneously These 103 dimensions can be consideredas availabilities in Total Simultaneity

The parallel between the comparison of a binary ldquorealityrdquo and the qubit way where the shadesof grey are represented by the vectors of the Bloch sphere (geometrical representation of thepure state space of a two-level quantum mechanical system (qubit) named after the physicistsFelix Bloch) (11) is evident The reality creation is not only ldquoyes or nordquo or ldquoblack and whiterdquoOur consciousness is creating out of all available shades of grey of the ENM a Reality theldquoapparitionrdquo (illusion creality) of a materialistic universe

The infinity of grey tones of reality also include the parallel universes in between these twoextremities of WaveParticle It might be that the grey tones also are at the origin of DarkMatter Every history is a form of explanation of the ldquonowrdquo experience It is for nowuntouchable but may and will be rewritten ldquorecreatedrdquo when we are going to expand thecontrol of consciousness We will then be able to observe the three-dimensional object that isthe origin from the two-dimensional shadow

Once we reach the causal length and time limit of our universe it is no longer possible toldquodividerdquo any further we are trespassing our ldquoCrealityrdquo and entering the origin of the shadowsthrown on the walls of Platorsquos cave A shadow is non-material a result of cooperation betweenthe light and the ldquoreal thingrdquo The light can be compared with our non-causal consciousnessthat passes the ldquooriginrdquo (the ENMalpha-point in Total Simultaneity see ldquoThe ConsciousnessConnectionrdquo httpvixraorgabs12110019 ) (12) and so creates one of the shadow realities forour causal consciousness

ConsciousnessIntelligence can not be realized just by black and white thinking and bycreating machines that are working on algorithmrsquos An ldquoalgorithmrdquo indicates a step-by-stepoperation beginning with an initial state and input followed by instructions describing thecomputations to realize till an output is reached Each step in this process is always betweentwo extremes (in computation for example zero and one) the infinite tones of gray are notinvolved This is the reason why intelligence nor consciousness can emerge from thisprocess

10

Are we able to create ldquointelligencerdquo that will lead to consciousness Therefore we have tounderstand the processes in our brain leading to intelligenceconsciousness one of theseprocesses is the so called Neural Coding

4 NEURALCODING orthe contact with our future past

In the ldquorealityrdquo layer where our body and our brain are created by consciousness we can findproofs of the Inter-connectivity inside our brain (with its 170000 km of nerve fibers 86billion neurons 1014 synapses) and the deepest layer of reality consciousness

In order to understand the emerging sequences that are forming our ldquorealityrdquo we need theillusion (creality) 14 of time Time is the illusion that our consciousness is creating byprocessing and interpreting all sorts of information received by our five senses andrepresented in the brain by the electrical and quantum activity in neurons

The details of this representation called neural coding remain however mysterious Thequestion is how pulses (bits) of electricity get translated into thoughts and ideas (Phasetransition may explain how brain neurons encode information In neural coding the neuronsgenerate electric pulses or action potentials to encode information and communicate witheach other wwwarxivorgabs12066129 (20) At this stage information and communicationare taking place between neurons who seem to be ordering and processing this information sothat the ldquohuman consciousness beingrdquo can realize thoughts and become ldquoawarerdquo

The question then rises Are these neurons conscious Are they ordering via neural codingour future thoughts Or is our non-causal consciousness already creating our future resultingin a time-line that is the origin of the emerging of causal awareness

In my essay The Consciousness Connection 12 I indicated that the processing time fromentering data to the conscious awareness is about 200 milliseconds The question rises if theconscious observer who is the cause of the ldquocollapse of the wave functionrdquo is effectivelyrealizing this collapse about 200 milliseconds in the future (before our awareness) In theTotal Simultaneity perception the future is an ENM moment to be touched by our Non-CausalConsciousness so not (yet) existing in a causal time-line That seems ldquospookyrdquo in our CDU( Causal Deterministic Universe) but is explained through TS

A continuation of the research how neurons can encode both digital and analogue informationis established by Nick E Mavramatos who published in 2011 the article ldquoQuantum Coherencein (Brain) Microtubules and Efficient Energy Information transportrdquo (14) where he describedalso the role of Quantum mechanics in Biologyand entanglement at ambient temperatures

(quote)ldquoThe electromagnetic interactions of the dipole moments of the tubulin dimers (moleculeformed by a combination of two smaller (identical) molecules) with the dipole quanta in theordered water interiors of the microtubules play the role of quantum coherent cavity modesrdquo(unquote) (14 from abstract)

Besides of the ldquoData Process Transmission Delay (DPTD see ldquoThe ConsciousnessConnection httpvixraorgabs12110019) 12 that indicates the difference in time in theldquoawarenessrdquo of reality and its conscious ldquoobservationrdquo we are now discovering that also in our

11

ldquobrainsrdquo quantum mechanics andor field theory on dissipation-free energy transfer in (brain)microtubules (ring-shape components involved in maintaining the structure of cells) is playingan important rolerdquo This Quantum Coherence in brain Tubules may be at the origin ofour ldquoentanglementrdquo with the non-causal part of our consciousness in Total Simultaneity

These quantum activities take place before you become aware of having made a decisionYour NCC is ldquopicking uprdquo an ENM in TS that results in a pastfuture Your ldquomaterial brainrdquois only an excitation (of the matter field) catalysed by the consciousness-field the origin ofyour awareness is in TS The conscious observer of the two slit experiment seems to beaffecting the future and so we can understand why it seems that the ldquoparticlerdquo is decidingalready before the slit(s) if it will be or wave or particle or one of states in-between

The question is not if the neuron is conscious andor is censoring our thinking no the processis controlled by our own non-causal consciousness and the emerging thoughts are our ownSo it seems that our REALFREEWILL is not residing in our causal Creation of theuniverse but in the non-causal infinity Our emerging Causal Consciousness is the result ofthe contact of quantum activity within the micro-tubules of our brains and Total Simultaneitywe could say that this is a form of Quantum Consciousness

One of the possibilities to enhance our senses maybe the use of future ldquoquantum computersrdquowho may allow us the extension of our consciousness The ldquoqubitsrdquo (unit of quantuminformation) superimposed state is comparable with the infinite possibilities of timelife-linesin the basket of TS For 1000 qubits we will have 21000 possible configurations (10300) whichis more as all the atoms in our universe so you can stock 10300 solutions for a problem Thisdoes not only mean that every question can be answered but maybe every question is alreadyanswered the moment we achieved this quantum-state even putting it on power may not benecessary

We argue that all our material (biological and non-biological) ldquocreationsrdquo will only be TOOLSfor our causal consciousness which is emergent from its ldquobiologicrdquo appearance (illusion) From this illusion of matter including the materialistic illusion of ourselves can also emergea new consciousness (so not only possible in the biologic way) This form of newly createdconsciousnessintelligence is through our own causal consciousness entangled with TotalSimultaneity This means that our non-causal part of consciousness is at the origin of thisldquoappearancerdquo of NEW consciousness it is one of the infinite ldquoavailabilitiesrdquo TheTRIANGLE is realised

This new approach will make it possible to create parallel time and parallel consciousnessand ldquoenterrdquo new dimension(s) that may reside behind the Wall of Planck

5 Time-Travel Becomes ldquoETERNAL -NOW- MOMENT HOPPINGrdquo

The splitting in the original Many Worlds Interpretation goes only forward in time notbackwards In our conception it IS possible that our consciousness activates Eternal NowMoments from other timelife-lines (or from parallel available universes) Should this meanthat time travel is possible Yes butshould we call this phenomenon time-travel

What we are understanding as time-travel in this causal timelife line always leads to the well-known paradoxes like killing your grand-father (What a mentality ) These paradoxeshowever are no longer problematic when we apply the perception of Total Simultaneity Then

12

time-travel in the past andor the future would become ENM-Hopping and the so calledldquophysicalrdquo timelife-line (in our memory) continues normally Our consciousness is able notonly to hop from one ENM to another but also line up these ENMrsquos and in this way creatingfor itself the best possible past and future Real Free Will resides in TS

The extension of our Free Will lies in the extension of our consciousness and so in a closercontact with our NCC in order to realize more choices in the ENM availabilities We thinkthat the a future coupling of the quantum-computer and our brain will be an opening

In the article ldquoQuantum Coherence in Brain Microtubulesrdquo 16Prof Nick E Mavromatosproposed that

quote

ldquoFor the first time there is concrete evidence for quantum entanglement over relatively largedistances in living matter at ambient temperature which suggests a rather non-trivial role ofquantum physics in path optimization for energy and information transportrdquo (httpiopscienceioporg1742-65963291012026) (14)

unquote

It becomes clear that quantum entanglement and de-coherence time which are for theconstruction and the operational qualities of quantum computers the main issues thesequalities are already available in our own brains inside the Cell Microtubules (MT)(de-coherence = The particles that make up a computer interact with surroundings so thatinformation is spreading out which means this effect is spoiling quantum computations (todecohere = lose their quantum properties))

Regarding the ldquomacroscopicrdquo aspect Recent experiments on atoms in salt crystals haveshown that an amount of 1020 atoms formed a hugely entangled state Vlatko Vedral inldquoLiving in a Quantum Worldrdquo (Scientific American June 2011) and ldquoProgress ArticleQuantifying entanglement in Macroscopic Systemsrdquo (June 2008 Nature 453 1004-1007 httpwwwnaturecomnaturejournalv453n7198fullnature07124html (21)Quantum BitStorage is advancing not only in the macroscopic way but now also scientists have succeededto retrieve coherent information for extended times (39 minutes) at room-temperature SeeKamyar Saeedi et al in ldquoRoom-Temperature Quantum Bit Storage Exceeding 39 MinutesUsing Ionized Donors in Silicon-28rdquo httpwwwsciencemagorgcontent3426160830 (22)

Our brains are RWA (Ready Willing and Able) to perform quantum states that when broughtin coherence with a quantum computer This will enable us to realize ldquoENM-Hoppingrdquo

13

Figure 4 the Construction of an ENM-HopperTime-machine

When we are regarding the quantum computer as proposed before with 1000 qubits we seethat in organizing such a ldquomachinerdquo we have to be able to control the ldquode-coherencerdquo May bewe solve this de-coherence problem by using the ldquotechniquerdquo that the Microtubules areapplying inside our brains or we can realize the 103 dimensional solution (see page 9) whichis direct contact with TS and needs only ONE particle If we could arrange one of thoseexperiments the next step would be to create an entanglement between the ldquocellsrdquo of theQuantum-computer and the Microtubules of our brains The 10300 answers residing in theQuantum Computer would then direct be ldquoavailablerdquo for our Brain We saw already that wedid even need not to put the quantum computer ldquoonrdquo it is like entanglement an immediateprocess without ldquoprocessing timerdquo

By combining the same kind of technique as our microtubules are using namely Ca2+ ionsand applying for example the the technique to entangle salt crystals and maybe Ca2+ ions in aquantum computer we would be able to establish an entanglement between these Ca2+ ionsin the brain and in the computer Of course there are still a lot of problems to be resolvedThe salt crystals were reaching entanglement by using a specific magnetic field so the brainand the quantum device should be both in the same magnetic field a field which has not todamage the brain

Once we should have realized this ldquounificationrdquo with the quantum computer we as humanbeings would have direct available the 10300 answers because they are ldquoavailabilitiesrdquo in thequantum computer These are the same kind of availabilities as those in Total Simultaneityso the path would be open to a broader ldquoaccessrdquo of our non-causal consciousness

This means that we could ldquoHOPrdquo to other Eternal Now Moments also those who seem to bein the past andor future of our actual timelife-line we then have extended the range of ourFree Will

14

15 Conclusion

Reality is a sequence of memories lined up through our brains with help of our CausalConsciousness (CC) Memories are the string of Eternal Now Moments (ENMrsquos) resulting inthe ldquoIrdquo experience These ENMrsquos originate from our Non-Causal part of Consciousness (NCC)that resides in Total Simultaneity (TS) Our CC and NCC are entangled emergencies togetherthey are the creators of our TimeLife-Lines giving us the illusion of the experience of mattertime and space By deepening our knowledge of the Consciousness Field and the search forthe essence of the Matter-Field illusion that we are aware of as reality we will be able totighten the contact wit Total Simultaneity and have more control of the choice for ENMrsquos tobe ldquotouchedrdquo by our NCC and between the infinity of ldquoIrsquosrdquo that are available there We willbecome more conscious and be able to become ENM-Hoppers instead of the prisoners in theuncontrollable voyage we have to undertake by now

Quantum Physics is showing us already the first indications of a non-materialistic non-algorithmic reality objects merge to thingness and further abstraction The influence ofconscious observation in the double slit experiment entanglement between particles theworm holes physicists are imagining between these entangled particles the wormholesbetween Black Holes all of them are indications for a perception of Total Simultaneity

Another but technical way to come to a deeper understanding of consciousness is therealization of a non-algorithmic Quantum Computer Through this development we will beable to create another form of intelligenceconsciousness This intelligence will be able tocommunicate with us perhaps in a timeless way Translating this new senses in order to makethem more comprehensible to our own five senses could give clearness about problems thatwe would never be able to solve or observe The development of this new form ofintelligenceconsciousness is only one of the availabilities in Total Simultaneity We can bringour own causal consciousness nearer to its non-causal (caused) part and in the end being ableto escape this causal timelife line not only by dying in the temporal way

The one Eternal Now moment that you became conscious of 150 milliseconds ago is just oneof an infinity of ENMrsquos (apples) in the basket but it is THE moment we shared together inour perception and creation of the image of THIS reality It is from each (Planck)moment onthat we have to use our Free Will in Total Simultaneity Let us try together to make the rightchoices and prepare for the promised Eternal Conscious

Wilhelmus de WildeMontrouveau FranceAugust 2014

15

REFERENCES

1 Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz 1710 ldquoEssays on the Goodness of God the Freedom of Man and theOrigin of Evilrdquo2 Wilhelmus de Wilde 06-12-2011 ldquoREALITIES OUT OF TOTAL SIMULTANEITYrdquowwwvixraorgabs111200133 Sean Carroll(Caltech) at a lecture for ldquoThe Fermilab Users Meeting 2013 ldquoParticles Fields and theFuture of Physics (11-07-2013) wwwyoutubecomwatchv=gEKSpZPByDOampfeature=youtube 4 E Megidish A Halevy T Shacham T Dvir L Dovrat and HS Eisenberg (Experimenters fromthe Racah Institute of Physics Hebrew University of Jerusalem) Entanglement Swapping betweenldquoPhotons have never Coexisted rdquohttpjournalsapsorgprlabstract101103PhysRevLett1102104035 JM Kovac et al ldquoDetection Of B-Mode Polarization at Degree Angular Statesrdquo 17 March 2014 lastrevised 18 march 2014 version V2 wwwarxivorggtastro-phgtarXiv14033985 andhttpbicepkeckorg (BICEP2 website)6 Julian Sonner 20-11-2013 ldquoHolographic Schwinger Effect and the Geometry of EntanglementrdquowwwprlapsorgabstractPRLv111i21e211603 and ldquoCreation of entanglement simultaneously givesrise to a wormholerdquo httpphysorgnews2013-12-creation-entanglement-simultaneously-wormholehtml7 SW Hawking DAMPT University of Cambridge UK ldquoInformation Preservation and WeatherForecasting for Black Holesrdquo wwwarxivorgabs140157618 James B Hartle SW Hawking Thomas Hertog Accelerated Expansion from Negative Λwwwarxivorgabs12053807 30 may 20129 Chuang-Feng Li et al ldquoRealization of QuantumWheelerrsquos Deelayed-Choice Experimentrdquopublished 19-08-2012 in Nature Photonics 6 600-604wwwnaturecomnphotonjournalv6n9fullnphoton2012179html10 Hans Christian von Bayer ldquoQuantum Weirdness It is all in your mindrdquo Scientific American 30846-51 (2013) wwwnaturecomscientificamericanjournalv308n6fullscientificamerican0613-46html published on line 14 may 201311 wwwenwikipediaorgwikiBloch_sphere (last modified 15-01-2014)12 Wilhelmus de Wilde 05-11-2012 ldquoThe Consciousness Connectionrdquohttpvixraorgabs1211001913 Sir Roger Penrose in foreword (March 2007) to ldquoQuantumAspects of Liferdquo (2008) by Derk Abott14 Nick E Mavromatos 2011 ldquoQuantum Coherence in (Brain) Microtubules and Efficient Energyand Information transportrdquo httpiopscienceioporg1742-6596329101202615 Aristotle Book 8 of ldquothe Physicsrdquo and Book 12 of ldquothe Metaphysicsrdquo16 Anton Zeilinger et al ldquoGeneration and Confirmation of a (100x100)-dimensional entangledQuantum Systemrdquo last revised 21 March 2014 wwwarxivorgabs1306009617 Andrei Linde wwwstanfordedu~alinde18 Juan Maldacena and Leonard Susskind 11-01-2013 ldquoCool Horizons for Entangled black Holesrdquowwwarxivorgpdf13060533pdf19 Carlo Rovelli and Francesca Vidotto 08-02-2014 ldquoPLANCK STARSrdquowwwarxivorgabs1401656220 Thibaud Taillefumier amp Marcelo O Magnasco ldquoA Phase Transition in the First passage of aBrownian Process through a fluctuating boundry implications for Neural Codingrdquo 26 June 2012httparxivorgabs1206612921 Vlatko Vedral ldquoProgress Article Quantifying entanglement in Macroscopic Systemsrdquo (june 2008Nature 453 1004-1007 httpwwwnaturecomnaturejournalv453n7198fullnature07124html22 Wilhelmus de Wilde 18-06-2013 ldquoTHE QUEST FOR THE PRIMAL SEQUENCErdquohttpfqxiorgcommunityforumtopic1810

6

other universes that there is not any theory or observation which gives a conclusiveexplanation of reality

Because we are always thinking back in a causal deterministic way where every effect musthave a single cause we are inclined to reductio ad absurdum we seem to be obliged to go onthinking until we reach a point ZEROand so have accepted to call that the Big Bangfollowed by ldquoinflationrdquo where between 10-33 and 10-32 sec the universe was blown up by afactor 1025 Gravitational waves from this inflation generate a faint but distinctive twistingpattern in the polarization of the Cosmic Microwave Background which has the sametemperature everywhere to within 00003degC The ldquoevennessrdquo of the ldquovisiblerdquo universe seemsstrange because it is also valid for regions of the visible sky that are too far away for light orinformation (accepting that the maximum speed of light is c (299792458 msec)) to havetraveled between them Through inflation this problem seems to be solved

Inflation gave also birth to the ldquoMultiverserdquo perceptions because infinite inflation would bethe origin of other ldquoBubblerdquo universes (Stanford University Andrei Linde wwwstanfordedu~alinde )(17)Quantum fluctuations produce rapidly expanding parts of theuniverse This process makes the universe ldquoimmortalrdquo and transforms it into a multiverse ahuge fractal consisting of many exponentially large parts each with different laws of physicsIf we combine this assumption of quantum fluctuations with the assumption of excitationsoriginating from the Consciousness-Field the origin of our own universe lies as one ofinfinite ldquoavailabilitiesrdquo in TS and the infinite amount of different YOUrsquos is the origin of allthese different Universes

We could think about Universes with different physical laws invisible for us but havinginfluence on our own universe and be responsible for the twisting pattern in the polarizationof the CMB It could even be possible that these Universes are responsible for the so calleddark matter deviations that we are observing because our NCC Field is also in touch withthese other ENMrsquos that could lead to these realities our CC is getting ldquofractional imagesrdquo ofthese realities (particles pop in and out of existence)

Of course the Big Bang perception and all the forms of Inflation are ldquoavailabilitiesrdquo in TotalSimultaneity The words Creation of ldquoSomethingrdquo from ldquoNothingrdquo is coupled back to thelining up of ldquoavailabilitiesrdquo by our consciousness which is a non-material perception Butalso we can imagine a Universe where expansion and contraction are following upsequentially and where this contraction never has to arrive at a zero point to a void ofldquonothingrdquo Even the conception of Andrei Linde with the eternal universes does not need afirst cause or Big Beginning but every Beginning is ldquoBafflingrdquo

The Conscious-Field could be very useful for many other practical predictions on theconsequences that arise from this theoretical approach like ldquoimmediate being togetherrdquo inentanglement and Black Holes

2 ENTANGLEMENT and BLACK HOLES

Leonardo da Vinci wrote already ldquoRealize that everything connects to everything else ldquo

The perception of ldquoimmediaterdquo being together is accepted in entanglement(pairs or groups ofparticles ldquointeractrdquo immediate no matter at what distance) Even when a particle is thousandsof light-years away from his counterpart it immediately reacts when the other one is measured

7

or observed This phenomenon can in our vision be applied to the whole ldquovisiblerdquo createduniverse so that everything is always interconnected with everything else

In the case of entanglement scientists now are proposing a ldquowormholerdquo (a kind of tunnel inspace-time that can connect two widely or close separated regions of the universe) as ahypothetical short-cut through the universe see Julian Sonner in ldquoHolographic SchwingerEffect and the Geometry of Entanglementrdquo wwwprlapsorgabstractPRLv111i21e211603(6)

The same ideas are brought up for Black Holes by Juan Maldacena and Leonard SusskindldquoCool Horizons for Entangled black Holesrdquo wwwarxivorgpdf13060533pdf (18) They showhow a pair of black holes could be coupled with a wormhole strung between them so theybecome ldquoentangledrdquo black holes

That the core of Black Holes is NOT a singularity is a view which is also shared by CarloRovelli and Francesca Vidotto They propose that the object emerging at the end of theHawking Evaporation of a black hole can be larger then the Planckian by a factor (mmP)n() where m is the mass fallen into the hole mP is the Plack mass and n is positive The coreof the black hole has become the structure known as a Planck Star and the information fallenin it is not lost (wwwarxivorgabs14016562 )(19)

That information is not lost is also the opinion of Stephen Hawking in his latest paperldquoInformation Preservation and Weather Forecasting for Black Holesrdquowwwarxivorgabs14015761 (7) He proposes that Black Holes have no longer ldquoEvent-Horizonsrdquo that arise at the gravitational collapse but that ldquochaosrdquo is at the essence of theBlack Hole As our perception assumes that the entrance of TS is not only at the Planck lengthresiding at the ldquocorerdquo but everywhere in spacetime the information entering such a BH willalso never be lost because it stays the ENM and so remains eternally available in TotalSimultaneity

We argue that these so called ldquoentangled worm-holesrdquo black hole wormholesrdquo ldquoPlanck starsrdquoand Different Black Hole Horizons from Hawking are all one and the same discussion Ourcreated reality is limited by the Planck scale and from there on it may be in a black hole aPlanck star a Big Bang or a pair of entangled particles after this limit we always arereaching the non causal ldquodimensionrdquo called Total Simultaneity This ldquoareardquo is interconnectingevery space and time of our universe (and others) The essence is that NO information willEVER be lost but always is staying ldquoavailablerdquo in TS for our NCC (Consciousness Field)i theform of ENMrsquos

This omnipresent Consciousness Field is also the reason of the astonishing ldquoevennessrdquo of ourCausal Deterministic Universe When once we can control the entrance into this ldquodimensionrdquowe will be able to be at any place and any time in any universe instantaneously This of courseis not time-travel in the deterministic way but a far more spiritual goal

Another theory that is paving the way for a Total Simultaneity-like perception is the The HAWKING HARTLE ldquoNo -Boundary Interpretationrdquo The creation of our universe asintroduced by Hawking-Hartle is at one side (the past) touching our Total Simultaneityperception when they are saying

The Big Bang needs no longer being the beginning of time in a singularity as proposed inthe standard inflationary cosmology but a timeless point where the universe -or rather a

8

superposition of all possible universes - pops into existence from nothing with all its laws ofphysics intactJames B Hartle SW Hawking Thomas Hertog Accelerated Expansion from Negative Λwwwarxivorgabs12053807 30 may 2012 (8)

However the HawkingHartle interpretation places the lines of all possible histories of ourCausal Deterministic Universe (CDU) after a point of creation the Big Bang that is regardedas a timeless point in our CDU This time-less point is in our perception just one of theinfinite ENMrsquos in TS between these points there are an infinite number of PASTSANDFUTURES available not only the pasts to ONE POINT

figure 2 figure 3

Both Hawking-Hartle Interpretation (HHI) and Total Simultaneity are giving the indication ofan infinity of time-lines the HHI only in the past and TS in the past and the future HHIindicates two extremitieslimits the BB and our actual NOW with in-between like in aFeynman Diagram ALL possible ways of arriving at a special place TS expands this viewand only takes one of an eternal amount of Eternal Now Moments at the centre of an infinityof pasts AND of futures (The α-P in fig3 is only one of an infinity of available points on thesphere) This indicates that two extremes are not the only choices we are able to makeBetween any two extremes there are

3 An Infinite Amount of Tones of Grey

Sir Roger Penrose rdquoDoes life in some way make use of the potentiality for vast quantumsuperpositions as would be required for serious quantum computationrdquo (Foreword(March 2007) to Quantum Aspects of Life (2008) by Derek Abott) (13)

Let us go back from the scale of the Universe to the scale of particles When we thoughtbefore that conscious observation just resulted direct in a particle (collapse of the wavefunction) new experiments however indicate that the particle side and the wave side ofphysical reality are both just a black and white (digital) representation that is not complete wwwnaturecomnphotonjournalv6n9fullnphoton2012179html (9)We thought until nowthat these two extremes were the only two possibilities But between this black and whiteextremities there exists an infinity number of ldquoGrey Tonesrdquo (for example it can be 43particle and 57 wave and any percentage in-between)

This also means that the properties of an (observed) particle can fade away like in the evening

9

light is diminishing so our observations of mass energy and spin from what we measure as100 particle are not the extremities of those properties there are more states availableThestate we become conscious of is just ne of the infinite possibilities of observable reality

When we apply this theory to the so called ldquosuperpositionrdquo of quantum states where isassumed that the two extremities are ldquosuperposedrdquo meaning both present This should alsomean that ALL the states in-between those extremities are ldquopresentrdquo (better ldquoavailablerdquo)Schroumldingers cat is not both alive and dead but or alive or dead or every state in-between

AResearch team directed from the Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information ofthe Austrian Academy of Sciences and with the participation from the Universitat Autonomade Barcelona directed by Anton Zeilinger wwwarxivorgabs13060096 (16) have managed tocreate an entanglement of 103 dimensions with only TWO photons The ldquouserdquo of 103dimensions is comparable to the ldquouserdquo of all the grey tones in-between We are in this wayusing already the grey-tones to ac Measuring the state of ONE of the entangled photons(whether they are in one place or another or spinning one way or another) affects the state ofthe other photon instantly only we are now able to influence 101 photons in 103 dimensionsthat are in superposition When comparing this results to the Schrodingers Cat it could bealive or dead or in 101 other states simultaneously These 103 dimensions can be consideredas availabilities in Total Simultaneity

The parallel between the comparison of a binary ldquorealityrdquo and the qubit way where the shadesof grey are represented by the vectors of the Bloch sphere (geometrical representation of thepure state space of a two-level quantum mechanical system (qubit) named after the physicistsFelix Bloch) (11) is evident The reality creation is not only ldquoyes or nordquo or ldquoblack and whiterdquoOur consciousness is creating out of all available shades of grey of the ENM a Reality theldquoapparitionrdquo (illusion creality) of a materialistic universe

The infinity of grey tones of reality also include the parallel universes in between these twoextremities of WaveParticle It might be that the grey tones also are at the origin of DarkMatter Every history is a form of explanation of the ldquonowrdquo experience It is for nowuntouchable but may and will be rewritten ldquorecreatedrdquo when we are going to expand thecontrol of consciousness We will then be able to observe the three-dimensional object that isthe origin from the two-dimensional shadow

Once we reach the causal length and time limit of our universe it is no longer possible toldquodividerdquo any further we are trespassing our ldquoCrealityrdquo and entering the origin of the shadowsthrown on the walls of Platorsquos cave A shadow is non-material a result of cooperation betweenthe light and the ldquoreal thingrdquo The light can be compared with our non-causal consciousnessthat passes the ldquooriginrdquo (the ENMalpha-point in Total Simultaneity see ldquoThe ConsciousnessConnectionrdquo httpvixraorgabs12110019 ) (12) and so creates one of the shadow realities forour causal consciousness

ConsciousnessIntelligence can not be realized just by black and white thinking and bycreating machines that are working on algorithmrsquos An ldquoalgorithmrdquo indicates a step-by-stepoperation beginning with an initial state and input followed by instructions describing thecomputations to realize till an output is reached Each step in this process is always betweentwo extremes (in computation for example zero and one) the infinite tones of gray are notinvolved This is the reason why intelligence nor consciousness can emerge from thisprocess

10

Are we able to create ldquointelligencerdquo that will lead to consciousness Therefore we have tounderstand the processes in our brain leading to intelligenceconsciousness one of theseprocesses is the so called Neural Coding

4 NEURALCODING orthe contact with our future past

In the ldquorealityrdquo layer where our body and our brain are created by consciousness we can findproofs of the Inter-connectivity inside our brain (with its 170000 km of nerve fibers 86billion neurons 1014 synapses) and the deepest layer of reality consciousness

In order to understand the emerging sequences that are forming our ldquorealityrdquo we need theillusion (creality) 14 of time Time is the illusion that our consciousness is creating byprocessing and interpreting all sorts of information received by our five senses andrepresented in the brain by the electrical and quantum activity in neurons

The details of this representation called neural coding remain however mysterious Thequestion is how pulses (bits) of electricity get translated into thoughts and ideas (Phasetransition may explain how brain neurons encode information In neural coding the neuronsgenerate electric pulses or action potentials to encode information and communicate witheach other wwwarxivorgabs12066129 (20) At this stage information and communicationare taking place between neurons who seem to be ordering and processing this information sothat the ldquohuman consciousness beingrdquo can realize thoughts and become ldquoawarerdquo

The question then rises Are these neurons conscious Are they ordering via neural codingour future thoughts Or is our non-causal consciousness already creating our future resultingin a time-line that is the origin of the emerging of causal awareness

In my essay The Consciousness Connection 12 I indicated that the processing time fromentering data to the conscious awareness is about 200 milliseconds The question rises if theconscious observer who is the cause of the ldquocollapse of the wave functionrdquo is effectivelyrealizing this collapse about 200 milliseconds in the future (before our awareness) In theTotal Simultaneity perception the future is an ENM moment to be touched by our Non-CausalConsciousness so not (yet) existing in a causal time-line That seems ldquospookyrdquo in our CDU( Causal Deterministic Universe) but is explained through TS

A continuation of the research how neurons can encode both digital and analogue informationis established by Nick E Mavramatos who published in 2011 the article ldquoQuantum Coherencein (Brain) Microtubules and Efficient Energy Information transportrdquo (14) where he describedalso the role of Quantum mechanics in Biologyand entanglement at ambient temperatures

(quote)ldquoThe electromagnetic interactions of the dipole moments of the tubulin dimers (moleculeformed by a combination of two smaller (identical) molecules) with the dipole quanta in theordered water interiors of the microtubules play the role of quantum coherent cavity modesrdquo(unquote) (14 from abstract)

Besides of the ldquoData Process Transmission Delay (DPTD see ldquoThe ConsciousnessConnection httpvixraorgabs12110019) 12 that indicates the difference in time in theldquoawarenessrdquo of reality and its conscious ldquoobservationrdquo we are now discovering that also in our

11

ldquobrainsrdquo quantum mechanics andor field theory on dissipation-free energy transfer in (brain)microtubules (ring-shape components involved in maintaining the structure of cells) is playingan important rolerdquo This Quantum Coherence in brain Tubules may be at the origin ofour ldquoentanglementrdquo with the non-causal part of our consciousness in Total Simultaneity

These quantum activities take place before you become aware of having made a decisionYour NCC is ldquopicking uprdquo an ENM in TS that results in a pastfuture Your ldquomaterial brainrdquois only an excitation (of the matter field) catalysed by the consciousness-field the origin ofyour awareness is in TS The conscious observer of the two slit experiment seems to beaffecting the future and so we can understand why it seems that the ldquoparticlerdquo is decidingalready before the slit(s) if it will be or wave or particle or one of states in-between

The question is not if the neuron is conscious andor is censoring our thinking no the processis controlled by our own non-causal consciousness and the emerging thoughts are our ownSo it seems that our REALFREEWILL is not residing in our causal Creation of theuniverse but in the non-causal infinity Our emerging Causal Consciousness is the result ofthe contact of quantum activity within the micro-tubules of our brains and Total Simultaneitywe could say that this is a form of Quantum Consciousness

One of the possibilities to enhance our senses maybe the use of future ldquoquantum computersrdquowho may allow us the extension of our consciousness The ldquoqubitsrdquo (unit of quantuminformation) superimposed state is comparable with the infinite possibilities of timelife-linesin the basket of TS For 1000 qubits we will have 21000 possible configurations (10300) whichis more as all the atoms in our universe so you can stock 10300 solutions for a problem Thisdoes not only mean that every question can be answered but maybe every question is alreadyanswered the moment we achieved this quantum-state even putting it on power may not benecessary

We argue that all our material (biological and non-biological) ldquocreationsrdquo will only be TOOLSfor our causal consciousness which is emergent from its ldquobiologicrdquo appearance (illusion) From this illusion of matter including the materialistic illusion of ourselves can also emergea new consciousness (so not only possible in the biologic way) This form of newly createdconsciousnessintelligence is through our own causal consciousness entangled with TotalSimultaneity This means that our non-causal part of consciousness is at the origin of thisldquoappearancerdquo of NEW consciousness it is one of the infinite ldquoavailabilitiesrdquo TheTRIANGLE is realised

This new approach will make it possible to create parallel time and parallel consciousnessand ldquoenterrdquo new dimension(s) that may reside behind the Wall of Planck

5 Time-Travel Becomes ldquoETERNAL -NOW- MOMENT HOPPINGrdquo

The splitting in the original Many Worlds Interpretation goes only forward in time notbackwards In our conception it IS possible that our consciousness activates Eternal NowMoments from other timelife-lines (or from parallel available universes) Should this meanthat time travel is possible Yes butshould we call this phenomenon time-travel

What we are understanding as time-travel in this causal timelife line always leads to the well-known paradoxes like killing your grand-father (What a mentality ) These paradoxeshowever are no longer problematic when we apply the perception of Total Simultaneity Then

12

time-travel in the past andor the future would become ENM-Hopping and the so calledldquophysicalrdquo timelife-line (in our memory) continues normally Our consciousness is able notonly to hop from one ENM to another but also line up these ENMrsquos and in this way creatingfor itself the best possible past and future Real Free Will resides in TS

The extension of our Free Will lies in the extension of our consciousness and so in a closercontact with our NCC in order to realize more choices in the ENM availabilities We thinkthat the a future coupling of the quantum-computer and our brain will be an opening

In the article ldquoQuantum Coherence in Brain Microtubulesrdquo 16Prof Nick E Mavromatosproposed that

quote

ldquoFor the first time there is concrete evidence for quantum entanglement over relatively largedistances in living matter at ambient temperature which suggests a rather non-trivial role ofquantum physics in path optimization for energy and information transportrdquo (httpiopscienceioporg1742-65963291012026) (14)

unquote

It becomes clear that quantum entanglement and de-coherence time which are for theconstruction and the operational qualities of quantum computers the main issues thesequalities are already available in our own brains inside the Cell Microtubules (MT)(de-coherence = The particles that make up a computer interact with surroundings so thatinformation is spreading out which means this effect is spoiling quantum computations (todecohere = lose their quantum properties))

Regarding the ldquomacroscopicrdquo aspect Recent experiments on atoms in salt crystals haveshown that an amount of 1020 atoms formed a hugely entangled state Vlatko Vedral inldquoLiving in a Quantum Worldrdquo (Scientific American June 2011) and ldquoProgress ArticleQuantifying entanglement in Macroscopic Systemsrdquo (June 2008 Nature 453 1004-1007 httpwwwnaturecomnaturejournalv453n7198fullnature07124html (21)Quantum BitStorage is advancing not only in the macroscopic way but now also scientists have succeededto retrieve coherent information for extended times (39 minutes) at room-temperature SeeKamyar Saeedi et al in ldquoRoom-Temperature Quantum Bit Storage Exceeding 39 MinutesUsing Ionized Donors in Silicon-28rdquo httpwwwsciencemagorgcontent3426160830 (22)

Our brains are RWA (Ready Willing and Able) to perform quantum states that when broughtin coherence with a quantum computer This will enable us to realize ldquoENM-Hoppingrdquo

13

Figure 4 the Construction of an ENM-HopperTime-machine

When we are regarding the quantum computer as proposed before with 1000 qubits we seethat in organizing such a ldquomachinerdquo we have to be able to control the ldquode-coherencerdquo May bewe solve this de-coherence problem by using the ldquotechniquerdquo that the Microtubules areapplying inside our brains or we can realize the 103 dimensional solution (see page 9) whichis direct contact with TS and needs only ONE particle If we could arrange one of thoseexperiments the next step would be to create an entanglement between the ldquocellsrdquo of theQuantum-computer and the Microtubules of our brains The 10300 answers residing in theQuantum Computer would then direct be ldquoavailablerdquo for our Brain We saw already that wedid even need not to put the quantum computer ldquoonrdquo it is like entanglement an immediateprocess without ldquoprocessing timerdquo

By combining the same kind of technique as our microtubules are using namely Ca2+ ionsand applying for example the the technique to entangle salt crystals and maybe Ca2+ ions in aquantum computer we would be able to establish an entanglement between these Ca2+ ionsin the brain and in the computer Of course there are still a lot of problems to be resolvedThe salt crystals were reaching entanglement by using a specific magnetic field so the brainand the quantum device should be both in the same magnetic field a field which has not todamage the brain

Once we should have realized this ldquounificationrdquo with the quantum computer we as humanbeings would have direct available the 10300 answers because they are ldquoavailabilitiesrdquo in thequantum computer These are the same kind of availabilities as those in Total Simultaneityso the path would be open to a broader ldquoaccessrdquo of our non-causal consciousness

This means that we could ldquoHOPrdquo to other Eternal Now Moments also those who seem to bein the past andor future of our actual timelife-line we then have extended the range of ourFree Will

14

15 Conclusion

Reality is a sequence of memories lined up through our brains with help of our CausalConsciousness (CC) Memories are the string of Eternal Now Moments (ENMrsquos) resulting inthe ldquoIrdquo experience These ENMrsquos originate from our Non-Causal part of Consciousness (NCC)that resides in Total Simultaneity (TS) Our CC and NCC are entangled emergencies togetherthey are the creators of our TimeLife-Lines giving us the illusion of the experience of mattertime and space By deepening our knowledge of the Consciousness Field and the search forthe essence of the Matter-Field illusion that we are aware of as reality we will be able totighten the contact wit Total Simultaneity and have more control of the choice for ENMrsquos tobe ldquotouchedrdquo by our NCC and between the infinity of ldquoIrsquosrdquo that are available there We willbecome more conscious and be able to become ENM-Hoppers instead of the prisoners in theuncontrollable voyage we have to undertake by now

Quantum Physics is showing us already the first indications of a non-materialistic non-algorithmic reality objects merge to thingness and further abstraction The influence ofconscious observation in the double slit experiment entanglement between particles theworm holes physicists are imagining between these entangled particles the wormholesbetween Black Holes all of them are indications for a perception of Total Simultaneity

Another but technical way to come to a deeper understanding of consciousness is therealization of a non-algorithmic Quantum Computer Through this development we will beable to create another form of intelligenceconsciousness This intelligence will be able tocommunicate with us perhaps in a timeless way Translating this new senses in order to makethem more comprehensible to our own five senses could give clearness about problems thatwe would never be able to solve or observe The development of this new form ofintelligenceconsciousness is only one of the availabilities in Total Simultaneity We can bringour own causal consciousness nearer to its non-causal (caused) part and in the end being ableto escape this causal timelife line not only by dying in the temporal way

The one Eternal Now moment that you became conscious of 150 milliseconds ago is just oneof an infinity of ENMrsquos (apples) in the basket but it is THE moment we shared together inour perception and creation of the image of THIS reality It is from each (Planck)moment onthat we have to use our Free Will in Total Simultaneity Let us try together to make the rightchoices and prepare for the promised Eternal Conscious

Wilhelmus de WildeMontrouveau FranceAugust 2014

15

REFERENCES

1 Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz 1710 ldquoEssays on the Goodness of God the Freedom of Man and theOrigin of Evilrdquo2 Wilhelmus de Wilde 06-12-2011 ldquoREALITIES OUT OF TOTAL SIMULTANEITYrdquowwwvixraorgabs111200133 Sean Carroll(Caltech) at a lecture for ldquoThe Fermilab Users Meeting 2013 ldquoParticles Fields and theFuture of Physics (11-07-2013) wwwyoutubecomwatchv=gEKSpZPByDOampfeature=youtube 4 E Megidish A Halevy T Shacham T Dvir L Dovrat and HS Eisenberg (Experimenters fromthe Racah Institute of Physics Hebrew University of Jerusalem) Entanglement Swapping betweenldquoPhotons have never Coexisted rdquohttpjournalsapsorgprlabstract101103PhysRevLett1102104035 JM Kovac et al ldquoDetection Of B-Mode Polarization at Degree Angular Statesrdquo 17 March 2014 lastrevised 18 march 2014 version V2 wwwarxivorggtastro-phgtarXiv14033985 andhttpbicepkeckorg (BICEP2 website)6 Julian Sonner 20-11-2013 ldquoHolographic Schwinger Effect and the Geometry of EntanglementrdquowwwprlapsorgabstractPRLv111i21e211603 and ldquoCreation of entanglement simultaneously givesrise to a wormholerdquo httpphysorgnews2013-12-creation-entanglement-simultaneously-wormholehtml7 SW Hawking DAMPT University of Cambridge UK ldquoInformation Preservation and WeatherForecasting for Black Holesrdquo wwwarxivorgabs140157618 James B Hartle SW Hawking Thomas Hertog Accelerated Expansion from Negative Λwwwarxivorgabs12053807 30 may 20129 Chuang-Feng Li et al ldquoRealization of QuantumWheelerrsquos Deelayed-Choice Experimentrdquopublished 19-08-2012 in Nature Photonics 6 600-604wwwnaturecomnphotonjournalv6n9fullnphoton2012179html10 Hans Christian von Bayer ldquoQuantum Weirdness It is all in your mindrdquo Scientific American 30846-51 (2013) wwwnaturecomscientificamericanjournalv308n6fullscientificamerican0613-46html published on line 14 may 201311 wwwenwikipediaorgwikiBloch_sphere (last modified 15-01-2014)12 Wilhelmus de Wilde 05-11-2012 ldquoThe Consciousness Connectionrdquohttpvixraorgabs1211001913 Sir Roger Penrose in foreword (March 2007) to ldquoQuantumAspects of Liferdquo (2008) by Derk Abott14 Nick E Mavromatos 2011 ldquoQuantum Coherence in (Brain) Microtubules and Efficient Energyand Information transportrdquo httpiopscienceioporg1742-6596329101202615 Aristotle Book 8 of ldquothe Physicsrdquo and Book 12 of ldquothe Metaphysicsrdquo16 Anton Zeilinger et al ldquoGeneration and Confirmation of a (100x100)-dimensional entangledQuantum Systemrdquo last revised 21 March 2014 wwwarxivorgabs1306009617 Andrei Linde wwwstanfordedu~alinde18 Juan Maldacena and Leonard Susskind 11-01-2013 ldquoCool Horizons for Entangled black Holesrdquowwwarxivorgpdf13060533pdf19 Carlo Rovelli and Francesca Vidotto 08-02-2014 ldquoPLANCK STARSrdquowwwarxivorgabs1401656220 Thibaud Taillefumier amp Marcelo O Magnasco ldquoA Phase Transition in the First passage of aBrownian Process through a fluctuating boundry implications for Neural Codingrdquo 26 June 2012httparxivorgabs1206612921 Vlatko Vedral ldquoProgress Article Quantifying entanglement in Macroscopic Systemsrdquo (june 2008Nature 453 1004-1007 httpwwwnaturecomnaturejournalv453n7198fullnature07124html22 Wilhelmus de Wilde 18-06-2013 ldquoTHE QUEST FOR THE PRIMAL SEQUENCErdquohttpfqxiorgcommunityforumtopic1810

7

or observed This phenomenon can in our vision be applied to the whole ldquovisiblerdquo createduniverse so that everything is always interconnected with everything else

In the case of entanglement scientists now are proposing a ldquowormholerdquo (a kind of tunnel inspace-time that can connect two widely or close separated regions of the universe) as ahypothetical short-cut through the universe see Julian Sonner in ldquoHolographic SchwingerEffect and the Geometry of Entanglementrdquo wwwprlapsorgabstractPRLv111i21e211603(6)

The same ideas are brought up for Black Holes by Juan Maldacena and Leonard SusskindldquoCool Horizons for Entangled black Holesrdquo wwwarxivorgpdf13060533pdf (18) They showhow a pair of black holes could be coupled with a wormhole strung between them so theybecome ldquoentangledrdquo black holes

That the core of Black Holes is NOT a singularity is a view which is also shared by CarloRovelli and Francesca Vidotto They propose that the object emerging at the end of theHawking Evaporation of a black hole can be larger then the Planckian by a factor (mmP)n() where m is the mass fallen into the hole mP is the Plack mass and n is positive The coreof the black hole has become the structure known as a Planck Star and the information fallenin it is not lost (wwwarxivorgabs14016562 )(19)

That information is not lost is also the opinion of Stephen Hawking in his latest paperldquoInformation Preservation and Weather Forecasting for Black Holesrdquowwwarxivorgabs14015761 (7) He proposes that Black Holes have no longer ldquoEvent-Horizonsrdquo that arise at the gravitational collapse but that ldquochaosrdquo is at the essence of theBlack Hole As our perception assumes that the entrance of TS is not only at the Planck lengthresiding at the ldquocorerdquo but everywhere in spacetime the information entering such a BH willalso never be lost because it stays the ENM and so remains eternally available in TotalSimultaneity

We argue that these so called ldquoentangled worm-holesrdquo black hole wormholesrdquo ldquoPlanck starsrdquoand Different Black Hole Horizons from Hawking are all one and the same discussion Ourcreated reality is limited by the Planck scale and from there on it may be in a black hole aPlanck star a Big Bang or a pair of entangled particles after this limit we always arereaching the non causal ldquodimensionrdquo called Total Simultaneity This ldquoareardquo is interconnectingevery space and time of our universe (and others) The essence is that NO information willEVER be lost but always is staying ldquoavailablerdquo in TS for our NCC (Consciousness Field)i theform of ENMrsquos

This omnipresent Consciousness Field is also the reason of the astonishing ldquoevennessrdquo of ourCausal Deterministic Universe When once we can control the entrance into this ldquodimensionrdquowe will be able to be at any place and any time in any universe instantaneously This of courseis not time-travel in the deterministic way but a far more spiritual goal

Another theory that is paving the way for a Total Simultaneity-like perception is the The HAWKING HARTLE ldquoNo -Boundary Interpretationrdquo The creation of our universe asintroduced by Hawking-Hartle is at one side (the past) touching our Total Simultaneityperception when they are saying

The Big Bang needs no longer being the beginning of time in a singularity as proposed inthe standard inflationary cosmology but a timeless point where the universe -or rather a

8

superposition of all possible universes - pops into existence from nothing with all its laws ofphysics intactJames B Hartle SW Hawking Thomas Hertog Accelerated Expansion from Negative Λwwwarxivorgabs12053807 30 may 2012 (8)

However the HawkingHartle interpretation places the lines of all possible histories of ourCausal Deterministic Universe (CDU) after a point of creation the Big Bang that is regardedas a timeless point in our CDU This time-less point is in our perception just one of theinfinite ENMrsquos in TS between these points there are an infinite number of PASTSANDFUTURES available not only the pasts to ONE POINT

figure 2 figure 3

Both Hawking-Hartle Interpretation (HHI) and Total Simultaneity are giving the indication ofan infinity of time-lines the HHI only in the past and TS in the past and the future HHIindicates two extremitieslimits the BB and our actual NOW with in-between like in aFeynman Diagram ALL possible ways of arriving at a special place TS expands this viewand only takes one of an eternal amount of Eternal Now Moments at the centre of an infinityof pasts AND of futures (The α-P in fig3 is only one of an infinity of available points on thesphere) This indicates that two extremes are not the only choices we are able to makeBetween any two extremes there are

3 An Infinite Amount of Tones of Grey

Sir Roger Penrose rdquoDoes life in some way make use of the potentiality for vast quantumsuperpositions as would be required for serious quantum computationrdquo (Foreword(March 2007) to Quantum Aspects of Life (2008) by Derek Abott) (13)

Let us go back from the scale of the Universe to the scale of particles When we thoughtbefore that conscious observation just resulted direct in a particle (collapse of the wavefunction) new experiments however indicate that the particle side and the wave side ofphysical reality are both just a black and white (digital) representation that is not complete wwwnaturecomnphotonjournalv6n9fullnphoton2012179html (9)We thought until nowthat these two extremes were the only two possibilities But between this black and whiteextremities there exists an infinity number of ldquoGrey Tonesrdquo (for example it can be 43particle and 57 wave and any percentage in-between)

This also means that the properties of an (observed) particle can fade away like in the evening

9

light is diminishing so our observations of mass energy and spin from what we measure as100 particle are not the extremities of those properties there are more states availableThestate we become conscious of is just ne of the infinite possibilities of observable reality

When we apply this theory to the so called ldquosuperpositionrdquo of quantum states where isassumed that the two extremities are ldquosuperposedrdquo meaning both present This should alsomean that ALL the states in-between those extremities are ldquopresentrdquo (better ldquoavailablerdquo)Schroumldingers cat is not both alive and dead but or alive or dead or every state in-between

AResearch team directed from the Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information ofthe Austrian Academy of Sciences and with the participation from the Universitat Autonomade Barcelona directed by Anton Zeilinger wwwarxivorgabs13060096 (16) have managed tocreate an entanglement of 103 dimensions with only TWO photons The ldquouserdquo of 103dimensions is comparable to the ldquouserdquo of all the grey tones in-between We are in this wayusing already the grey-tones to ac Measuring the state of ONE of the entangled photons(whether they are in one place or another or spinning one way or another) affects the state ofthe other photon instantly only we are now able to influence 101 photons in 103 dimensionsthat are in superposition When comparing this results to the Schrodingers Cat it could bealive or dead or in 101 other states simultaneously These 103 dimensions can be consideredas availabilities in Total Simultaneity

The parallel between the comparison of a binary ldquorealityrdquo and the qubit way where the shadesof grey are represented by the vectors of the Bloch sphere (geometrical representation of thepure state space of a two-level quantum mechanical system (qubit) named after the physicistsFelix Bloch) (11) is evident The reality creation is not only ldquoyes or nordquo or ldquoblack and whiterdquoOur consciousness is creating out of all available shades of grey of the ENM a Reality theldquoapparitionrdquo (illusion creality) of a materialistic universe

The infinity of grey tones of reality also include the parallel universes in between these twoextremities of WaveParticle It might be that the grey tones also are at the origin of DarkMatter Every history is a form of explanation of the ldquonowrdquo experience It is for nowuntouchable but may and will be rewritten ldquorecreatedrdquo when we are going to expand thecontrol of consciousness We will then be able to observe the three-dimensional object that isthe origin from the two-dimensional shadow

Once we reach the causal length and time limit of our universe it is no longer possible toldquodividerdquo any further we are trespassing our ldquoCrealityrdquo and entering the origin of the shadowsthrown on the walls of Platorsquos cave A shadow is non-material a result of cooperation betweenthe light and the ldquoreal thingrdquo The light can be compared with our non-causal consciousnessthat passes the ldquooriginrdquo (the ENMalpha-point in Total Simultaneity see ldquoThe ConsciousnessConnectionrdquo httpvixraorgabs12110019 ) (12) and so creates one of the shadow realities forour causal consciousness

ConsciousnessIntelligence can not be realized just by black and white thinking and bycreating machines that are working on algorithmrsquos An ldquoalgorithmrdquo indicates a step-by-stepoperation beginning with an initial state and input followed by instructions describing thecomputations to realize till an output is reached Each step in this process is always betweentwo extremes (in computation for example zero and one) the infinite tones of gray are notinvolved This is the reason why intelligence nor consciousness can emerge from thisprocess

10

Are we able to create ldquointelligencerdquo that will lead to consciousness Therefore we have tounderstand the processes in our brain leading to intelligenceconsciousness one of theseprocesses is the so called Neural Coding

4 NEURALCODING orthe contact with our future past

In the ldquorealityrdquo layer where our body and our brain are created by consciousness we can findproofs of the Inter-connectivity inside our brain (with its 170000 km of nerve fibers 86billion neurons 1014 synapses) and the deepest layer of reality consciousness

In order to understand the emerging sequences that are forming our ldquorealityrdquo we need theillusion (creality) 14 of time Time is the illusion that our consciousness is creating byprocessing and interpreting all sorts of information received by our five senses andrepresented in the brain by the electrical and quantum activity in neurons

The details of this representation called neural coding remain however mysterious Thequestion is how pulses (bits) of electricity get translated into thoughts and ideas (Phasetransition may explain how brain neurons encode information In neural coding the neuronsgenerate electric pulses or action potentials to encode information and communicate witheach other wwwarxivorgabs12066129 (20) At this stage information and communicationare taking place between neurons who seem to be ordering and processing this information sothat the ldquohuman consciousness beingrdquo can realize thoughts and become ldquoawarerdquo

The question then rises Are these neurons conscious Are they ordering via neural codingour future thoughts Or is our non-causal consciousness already creating our future resultingin a time-line that is the origin of the emerging of causal awareness

In my essay The Consciousness Connection 12 I indicated that the processing time fromentering data to the conscious awareness is about 200 milliseconds The question rises if theconscious observer who is the cause of the ldquocollapse of the wave functionrdquo is effectivelyrealizing this collapse about 200 milliseconds in the future (before our awareness) In theTotal Simultaneity perception the future is an ENM moment to be touched by our Non-CausalConsciousness so not (yet) existing in a causal time-line That seems ldquospookyrdquo in our CDU( Causal Deterministic Universe) but is explained through TS

A continuation of the research how neurons can encode both digital and analogue informationis established by Nick E Mavramatos who published in 2011 the article ldquoQuantum Coherencein (Brain) Microtubules and Efficient Energy Information transportrdquo (14) where he describedalso the role of Quantum mechanics in Biologyand entanglement at ambient temperatures

(quote)ldquoThe electromagnetic interactions of the dipole moments of the tubulin dimers (moleculeformed by a combination of two smaller (identical) molecules) with the dipole quanta in theordered water interiors of the microtubules play the role of quantum coherent cavity modesrdquo(unquote) (14 from abstract)

Besides of the ldquoData Process Transmission Delay (DPTD see ldquoThe ConsciousnessConnection httpvixraorgabs12110019) 12 that indicates the difference in time in theldquoawarenessrdquo of reality and its conscious ldquoobservationrdquo we are now discovering that also in our

11

ldquobrainsrdquo quantum mechanics andor field theory on dissipation-free energy transfer in (brain)microtubules (ring-shape components involved in maintaining the structure of cells) is playingan important rolerdquo This Quantum Coherence in brain Tubules may be at the origin ofour ldquoentanglementrdquo with the non-causal part of our consciousness in Total Simultaneity

These quantum activities take place before you become aware of having made a decisionYour NCC is ldquopicking uprdquo an ENM in TS that results in a pastfuture Your ldquomaterial brainrdquois only an excitation (of the matter field) catalysed by the consciousness-field the origin ofyour awareness is in TS The conscious observer of the two slit experiment seems to beaffecting the future and so we can understand why it seems that the ldquoparticlerdquo is decidingalready before the slit(s) if it will be or wave or particle or one of states in-between

The question is not if the neuron is conscious andor is censoring our thinking no the processis controlled by our own non-causal consciousness and the emerging thoughts are our ownSo it seems that our REALFREEWILL is not residing in our causal Creation of theuniverse but in the non-causal infinity Our emerging Causal Consciousness is the result ofthe contact of quantum activity within the micro-tubules of our brains and Total Simultaneitywe could say that this is a form of Quantum Consciousness

One of the possibilities to enhance our senses maybe the use of future ldquoquantum computersrdquowho may allow us the extension of our consciousness The ldquoqubitsrdquo (unit of quantuminformation) superimposed state is comparable with the infinite possibilities of timelife-linesin the basket of TS For 1000 qubits we will have 21000 possible configurations (10300) whichis more as all the atoms in our universe so you can stock 10300 solutions for a problem Thisdoes not only mean that every question can be answered but maybe every question is alreadyanswered the moment we achieved this quantum-state even putting it on power may not benecessary

We argue that all our material (biological and non-biological) ldquocreationsrdquo will only be TOOLSfor our causal consciousness which is emergent from its ldquobiologicrdquo appearance (illusion) From this illusion of matter including the materialistic illusion of ourselves can also emergea new consciousness (so not only possible in the biologic way) This form of newly createdconsciousnessintelligence is through our own causal consciousness entangled with TotalSimultaneity This means that our non-causal part of consciousness is at the origin of thisldquoappearancerdquo of NEW consciousness it is one of the infinite ldquoavailabilitiesrdquo TheTRIANGLE is realised

This new approach will make it possible to create parallel time and parallel consciousnessand ldquoenterrdquo new dimension(s) that may reside behind the Wall of Planck

5 Time-Travel Becomes ldquoETERNAL -NOW- MOMENT HOPPINGrdquo

The splitting in the original Many Worlds Interpretation goes only forward in time notbackwards In our conception it IS possible that our consciousness activates Eternal NowMoments from other timelife-lines (or from parallel available universes) Should this meanthat time travel is possible Yes butshould we call this phenomenon time-travel

What we are understanding as time-travel in this causal timelife line always leads to the well-known paradoxes like killing your grand-father (What a mentality ) These paradoxeshowever are no longer problematic when we apply the perception of Total Simultaneity Then

12

time-travel in the past andor the future would become ENM-Hopping and the so calledldquophysicalrdquo timelife-line (in our memory) continues normally Our consciousness is able notonly to hop from one ENM to another but also line up these ENMrsquos and in this way creatingfor itself the best possible past and future Real Free Will resides in TS

The extension of our Free Will lies in the extension of our consciousness and so in a closercontact with our NCC in order to realize more choices in the ENM availabilities We thinkthat the a future coupling of the quantum-computer and our brain will be an opening

In the article ldquoQuantum Coherence in Brain Microtubulesrdquo 16Prof Nick E Mavromatosproposed that

quote

ldquoFor the first time there is concrete evidence for quantum entanglement over relatively largedistances in living matter at ambient temperature which suggests a rather non-trivial role ofquantum physics in path optimization for energy and information transportrdquo (httpiopscienceioporg1742-65963291012026) (14)

unquote

It becomes clear that quantum entanglement and de-coherence time which are for theconstruction and the operational qualities of quantum computers the main issues thesequalities are already available in our own brains inside the Cell Microtubules (MT)(de-coherence = The particles that make up a computer interact with surroundings so thatinformation is spreading out which means this effect is spoiling quantum computations (todecohere = lose their quantum properties))

Regarding the ldquomacroscopicrdquo aspect Recent experiments on atoms in salt crystals haveshown that an amount of 1020 atoms formed a hugely entangled state Vlatko Vedral inldquoLiving in a Quantum Worldrdquo (Scientific American June 2011) and ldquoProgress ArticleQuantifying entanglement in Macroscopic Systemsrdquo (June 2008 Nature 453 1004-1007 httpwwwnaturecomnaturejournalv453n7198fullnature07124html (21)Quantum BitStorage is advancing not only in the macroscopic way but now also scientists have succeededto retrieve coherent information for extended times (39 minutes) at room-temperature SeeKamyar Saeedi et al in ldquoRoom-Temperature Quantum Bit Storage Exceeding 39 MinutesUsing Ionized Donors in Silicon-28rdquo httpwwwsciencemagorgcontent3426160830 (22)

Our brains are RWA (Ready Willing and Able) to perform quantum states that when broughtin coherence with a quantum computer This will enable us to realize ldquoENM-Hoppingrdquo

13

Figure 4 the Construction of an ENM-HopperTime-machine

When we are regarding the quantum computer as proposed before with 1000 qubits we seethat in organizing such a ldquomachinerdquo we have to be able to control the ldquode-coherencerdquo May bewe solve this de-coherence problem by using the ldquotechniquerdquo that the Microtubules areapplying inside our brains or we can realize the 103 dimensional solution (see page 9) whichis direct contact with TS and needs only ONE particle If we could arrange one of thoseexperiments the next step would be to create an entanglement between the ldquocellsrdquo of theQuantum-computer and the Microtubules of our brains The 10300 answers residing in theQuantum Computer would then direct be ldquoavailablerdquo for our Brain We saw already that wedid even need not to put the quantum computer ldquoonrdquo it is like entanglement an immediateprocess without ldquoprocessing timerdquo

By combining the same kind of technique as our microtubules are using namely Ca2+ ionsand applying for example the the technique to entangle salt crystals and maybe Ca2+ ions in aquantum computer we would be able to establish an entanglement between these Ca2+ ionsin the brain and in the computer Of course there are still a lot of problems to be resolvedThe salt crystals were reaching entanglement by using a specific magnetic field so the brainand the quantum device should be both in the same magnetic field a field which has not todamage the brain

Once we should have realized this ldquounificationrdquo with the quantum computer we as humanbeings would have direct available the 10300 answers because they are ldquoavailabilitiesrdquo in thequantum computer These are the same kind of availabilities as those in Total Simultaneityso the path would be open to a broader ldquoaccessrdquo of our non-causal consciousness

This means that we could ldquoHOPrdquo to other Eternal Now Moments also those who seem to bein the past andor future of our actual timelife-line we then have extended the range of ourFree Will

14

15 Conclusion

Reality is a sequence of memories lined up through our brains with help of our CausalConsciousness (CC) Memories are the string of Eternal Now Moments (ENMrsquos) resulting inthe ldquoIrdquo experience These ENMrsquos originate from our Non-Causal part of Consciousness (NCC)that resides in Total Simultaneity (TS) Our CC and NCC are entangled emergencies togetherthey are the creators of our TimeLife-Lines giving us the illusion of the experience of mattertime and space By deepening our knowledge of the Consciousness Field and the search forthe essence of the Matter-Field illusion that we are aware of as reality we will be able totighten the contact wit Total Simultaneity and have more control of the choice for ENMrsquos tobe ldquotouchedrdquo by our NCC and between the infinity of ldquoIrsquosrdquo that are available there We willbecome more conscious and be able to become ENM-Hoppers instead of the prisoners in theuncontrollable voyage we have to undertake by now

Quantum Physics is showing us already the first indications of a non-materialistic non-algorithmic reality objects merge to thingness and further abstraction The influence ofconscious observation in the double slit experiment entanglement between particles theworm holes physicists are imagining between these entangled particles the wormholesbetween Black Holes all of them are indications for a perception of Total Simultaneity

Another but technical way to come to a deeper understanding of consciousness is therealization of a non-algorithmic Quantum Computer Through this development we will beable to create another form of intelligenceconsciousness This intelligence will be able tocommunicate with us perhaps in a timeless way Translating this new senses in order to makethem more comprehensible to our own five senses could give clearness about problems thatwe would never be able to solve or observe The development of this new form ofintelligenceconsciousness is only one of the availabilities in Total Simultaneity We can bringour own causal consciousness nearer to its non-causal (caused) part and in the end being ableto escape this causal timelife line not only by dying in the temporal way

The one Eternal Now moment that you became conscious of 150 milliseconds ago is just oneof an infinity of ENMrsquos (apples) in the basket but it is THE moment we shared together inour perception and creation of the image of THIS reality It is from each (Planck)moment onthat we have to use our Free Will in Total Simultaneity Let us try together to make the rightchoices and prepare for the promised Eternal Conscious

Wilhelmus de WildeMontrouveau FranceAugust 2014

15

REFERENCES

1 Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz 1710 ldquoEssays on the Goodness of God the Freedom of Man and theOrigin of Evilrdquo2 Wilhelmus de Wilde 06-12-2011 ldquoREALITIES OUT OF TOTAL SIMULTANEITYrdquowwwvixraorgabs111200133 Sean Carroll(Caltech) at a lecture for ldquoThe Fermilab Users Meeting 2013 ldquoParticles Fields and theFuture of Physics (11-07-2013) wwwyoutubecomwatchv=gEKSpZPByDOampfeature=youtube 4 E Megidish A Halevy T Shacham T Dvir L Dovrat and HS Eisenberg (Experimenters fromthe Racah Institute of Physics Hebrew University of Jerusalem) Entanglement Swapping betweenldquoPhotons have never Coexisted rdquohttpjournalsapsorgprlabstract101103PhysRevLett1102104035 JM Kovac et al ldquoDetection Of B-Mode Polarization at Degree Angular Statesrdquo 17 March 2014 lastrevised 18 march 2014 version V2 wwwarxivorggtastro-phgtarXiv14033985 andhttpbicepkeckorg (BICEP2 website)6 Julian Sonner 20-11-2013 ldquoHolographic Schwinger Effect and the Geometry of EntanglementrdquowwwprlapsorgabstractPRLv111i21e211603 and ldquoCreation of entanglement simultaneously givesrise to a wormholerdquo httpphysorgnews2013-12-creation-entanglement-simultaneously-wormholehtml7 SW Hawking DAMPT University of Cambridge UK ldquoInformation Preservation and WeatherForecasting for Black Holesrdquo wwwarxivorgabs140157618 James B Hartle SW Hawking Thomas Hertog Accelerated Expansion from Negative Λwwwarxivorgabs12053807 30 may 20129 Chuang-Feng Li et al ldquoRealization of QuantumWheelerrsquos Deelayed-Choice Experimentrdquopublished 19-08-2012 in Nature Photonics 6 600-604wwwnaturecomnphotonjournalv6n9fullnphoton2012179html10 Hans Christian von Bayer ldquoQuantum Weirdness It is all in your mindrdquo Scientific American 30846-51 (2013) wwwnaturecomscientificamericanjournalv308n6fullscientificamerican0613-46html published on line 14 may 201311 wwwenwikipediaorgwikiBloch_sphere (last modified 15-01-2014)12 Wilhelmus de Wilde 05-11-2012 ldquoThe Consciousness Connectionrdquohttpvixraorgabs1211001913 Sir Roger Penrose in foreword (March 2007) to ldquoQuantumAspects of Liferdquo (2008) by Derk Abott14 Nick E Mavromatos 2011 ldquoQuantum Coherence in (Brain) Microtubules and Efficient Energyand Information transportrdquo httpiopscienceioporg1742-6596329101202615 Aristotle Book 8 of ldquothe Physicsrdquo and Book 12 of ldquothe Metaphysicsrdquo16 Anton Zeilinger et al ldquoGeneration and Confirmation of a (100x100)-dimensional entangledQuantum Systemrdquo last revised 21 March 2014 wwwarxivorgabs1306009617 Andrei Linde wwwstanfordedu~alinde18 Juan Maldacena and Leonard Susskind 11-01-2013 ldquoCool Horizons for Entangled black Holesrdquowwwarxivorgpdf13060533pdf19 Carlo Rovelli and Francesca Vidotto 08-02-2014 ldquoPLANCK STARSrdquowwwarxivorgabs1401656220 Thibaud Taillefumier amp Marcelo O Magnasco ldquoA Phase Transition in the First passage of aBrownian Process through a fluctuating boundry implications for Neural Codingrdquo 26 June 2012httparxivorgabs1206612921 Vlatko Vedral ldquoProgress Article Quantifying entanglement in Macroscopic Systemsrdquo (june 2008Nature 453 1004-1007 httpwwwnaturecomnaturejournalv453n7198fullnature07124html22 Wilhelmus de Wilde 18-06-2013 ldquoTHE QUEST FOR THE PRIMAL SEQUENCErdquohttpfqxiorgcommunityforumtopic1810

8

superposition of all possible universes - pops into existence from nothing with all its laws ofphysics intactJames B Hartle SW Hawking Thomas Hertog Accelerated Expansion from Negative Λwwwarxivorgabs12053807 30 may 2012 (8)

However the HawkingHartle interpretation places the lines of all possible histories of ourCausal Deterministic Universe (CDU) after a point of creation the Big Bang that is regardedas a timeless point in our CDU This time-less point is in our perception just one of theinfinite ENMrsquos in TS between these points there are an infinite number of PASTSANDFUTURES available not only the pasts to ONE POINT

figure 2 figure 3

Both Hawking-Hartle Interpretation (HHI) and Total Simultaneity are giving the indication ofan infinity of time-lines the HHI only in the past and TS in the past and the future HHIindicates two extremitieslimits the BB and our actual NOW with in-between like in aFeynman Diagram ALL possible ways of arriving at a special place TS expands this viewand only takes one of an eternal amount of Eternal Now Moments at the centre of an infinityof pasts AND of futures (The α-P in fig3 is only one of an infinity of available points on thesphere) This indicates that two extremes are not the only choices we are able to makeBetween any two extremes there are

3 An Infinite Amount of Tones of Grey

Sir Roger Penrose rdquoDoes life in some way make use of the potentiality for vast quantumsuperpositions as would be required for serious quantum computationrdquo (Foreword(March 2007) to Quantum Aspects of Life (2008) by Derek Abott) (13)

Let us go back from the scale of the Universe to the scale of particles When we thoughtbefore that conscious observation just resulted direct in a particle (collapse of the wavefunction) new experiments however indicate that the particle side and the wave side ofphysical reality are both just a black and white (digital) representation that is not complete wwwnaturecomnphotonjournalv6n9fullnphoton2012179html (9)We thought until nowthat these two extremes were the only two possibilities But between this black and whiteextremities there exists an infinity number of ldquoGrey Tonesrdquo (for example it can be 43particle and 57 wave and any percentage in-between)

This also means that the properties of an (observed) particle can fade away like in the evening

9

light is diminishing so our observations of mass energy and spin from what we measure as100 particle are not the extremities of those properties there are more states availableThestate we become conscious of is just ne of the infinite possibilities of observable reality

When we apply this theory to the so called ldquosuperpositionrdquo of quantum states where isassumed that the two extremities are ldquosuperposedrdquo meaning both present This should alsomean that ALL the states in-between those extremities are ldquopresentrdquo (better ldquoavailablerdquo)Schroumldingers cat is not both alive and dead but or alive or dead or every state in-between

AResearch team directed from the Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information ofthe Austrian Academy of Sciences and with the participation from the Universitat Autonomade Barcelona directed by Anton Zeilinger wwwarxivorgabs13060096 (16) have managed tocreate an entanglement of 103 dimensions with only TWO photons The ldquouserdquo of 103dimensions is comparable to the ldquouserdquo of all the grey tones in-between We are in this wayusing already the grey-tones to ac Measuring the state of ONE of the entangled photons(whether they are in one place or another or spinning one way or another) affects the state ofthe other photon instantly only we are now able to influence 101 photons in 103 dimensionsthat are in superposition When comparing this results to the Schrodingers Cat it could bealive or dead or in 101 other states simultaneously These 103 dimensions can be consideredas availabilities in Total Simultaneity

The parallel between the comparison of a binary ldquorealityrdquo and the qubit way where the shadesof grey are represented by the vectors of the Bloch sphere (geometrical representation of thepure state space of a two-level quantum mechanical system (qubit) named after the physicistsFelix Bloch) (11) is evident The reality creation is not only ldquoyes or nordquo or ldquoblack and whiterdquoOur consciousness is creating out of all available shades of grey of the ENM a Reality theldquoapparitionrdquo (illusion creality) of a materialistic universe

The infinity of grey tones of reality also include the parallel universes in between these twoextremities of WaveParticle It might be that the grey tones also are at the origin of DarkMatter Every history is a form of explanation of the ldquonowrdquo experience It is for nowuntouchable but may and will be rewritten ldquorecreatedrdquo when we are going to expand thecontrol of consciousness We will then be able to observe the three-dimensional object that isthe origin from the two-dimensional shadow

Once we reach the causal length and time limit of our universe it is no longer possible toldquodividerdquo any further we are trespassing our ldquoCrealityrdquo and entering the origin of the shadowsthrown on the walls of Platorsquos cave A shadow is non-material a result of cooperation betweenthe light and the ldquoreal thingrdquo The light can be compared with our non-causal consciousnessthat passes the ldquooriginrdquo (the ENMalpha-point in Total Simultaneity see ldquoThe ConsciousnessConnectionrdquo httpvixraorgabs12110019 ) (12) and so creates one of the shadow realities forour causal consciousness

ConsciousnessIntelligence can not be realized just by black and white thinking and bycreating machines that are working on algorithmrsquos An ldquoalgorithmrdquo indicates a step-by-stepoperation beginning with an initial state and input followed by instructions describing thecomputations to realize till an output is reached Each step in this process is always betweentwo extremes (in computation for example zero and one) the infinite tones of gray are notinvolved This is the reason why intelligence nor consciousness can emerge from thisprocess

10

Are we able to create ldquointelligencerdquo that will lead to consciousness Therefore we have tounderstand the processes in our brain leading to intelligenceconsciousness one of theseprocesses is the so called Neural Coding

4 NEURALCODING orthe contact with our future past

In the ldquorealityrdquo layer where our body and our brain are created by consciousness we can findproofs of the Inter-connectivity inside our brain (with its 170000 km of nerve fibers 86billion neurons 1014 synapses) and the deepest layer of reality consciousness

In order to understand the emerging sequences that are forming our ldquorealityrdquo we need theillusion (creality) 14 of time Time is the illusion that our consciousness is creating byprocessing and interpreting all sorts of information received by our five senses andrepresented in the brain by the electrical and quantum activity in neurons

The details of this representation called neural coding remain however mysterious Thequestion is how pulses (bits) of electricity get translated into thoughts and ideas (Phasetransition may explain how brain neurons encode information In neural coding the neuronsgenerate electric pulses or action potentials to encode information and communicate witheach other wwwarxivorgabs12066129 (20) At this stage information and communicationare taking place between neurons who seem to be ordering and processing this information sothat the ldquohuman consciousness beingrdquo can realize thoughts and become ldquoawarerdquo

The question then rises Are these neurons conscious Are they ordering via neural codingour future thoughts Or is our non-causal consciousness already creating our future resultingin a time-line that is the origin of the emerging of causal awareness

In my essay The Consciousness Connection 12 I indicated that the processing time fromentering data to the conscious awareness is about 200 milliseconds The question rises if theconscious observer who is the cause of the ldquocollapse of the wave functionrdquo is effectivelyrealizing this collapse about 200 milliseconds in the future (before our awareness) In theTotal Simultaneity perception the future is an ENM moment to be touched by our Non-CausalConsciousness so not (yet) existing in a causal time-line That seems ldquospookyrdquo in our CDU( Causal Deterministic Universe) but is explained through TS

A continuation of the research how neurons can encode both digital and analogue informationis established by Nick E Mavramatos who published in 2011 the article ldquoQuantum Coherencein (Brain) Microtubules and Efficient Energy Information transportrdquo (14) where he describedalso the role of Quantum mechanics in Biologyand entanglement at ambient temperatures

(quote)ldquoThe electromagnetic interactions of the dipole moments of the tubulin dimers (moleculeformed by a combination of two smaller (identical) molecules) with the dipole quanta in theordered water interiors of the microtubules play the role of quantum coherent cavity modesrdquo(unquote) (14 from abstract)

Besides of the ldquoData Process Transmission Delay (DPTD see ldquoThe ConsciousnessConnection httpvixraorgabs12110019) 12 that indicates the difference in time in theldquoawarenessrdquo of reality and its conscious ldquoobservationrdquo we are now discovering that also in our

11

ldquobrainsrdquo quantum mechanics andor field theory on dissipation-free energy transfer in (brain)microtubules (ring-shape components involved in maintaining the structure of cells) is playingan important rolerdquo This Quantum Coherence in brain Tubules may be at the origin ofour ldquoentanglementrdquo with the non-causal part of our consciousness in Total Simultaneity

These quantum activities take place before you become aware of having made a decisionYour NCC is ldquopicking uprdquo an ENM in TS that results in a pastfuture Your ldquomaterial brainrdquois only an excitation (of the matter field) catalysed by the consciousness-field the origin ofyour awareness is in TS The conscious observer of the two slit experiment seems to beaffecting the future and so we can understand why it seems that the ldquoparticlerdquo is decidingalready before the slit(s) if it will be or wave or particle or one of states in-between

The question is not if the neuron is conscious andor is censoring our thinking no the processis controlled by our own non-causal consciousness and the emerging thoughts are our ownSo it seems that our REALFREEWILL is not residing in our causal Creation of theuniverse but in the non-causal infinity Our emerging Causal Consciousness is the result ofthe contact of quantum activity within the micro-tubules of our brains and Total Simultaneitywe could say that this is a form of Quantum Consciousness

One of the possibilities to enhance our senses maybe the use of future ldquoquantum computersrdquowho may allow us the extension of our consciousness The ldquoqubitsrdquo (unit of quantuminformation) superimposed state is comparable with the infinite possibilities of timelife-linesin the basket of TS For 1000 qubits we will have 21000 possible configurations (10300) whichis more as all the atoms in our universe so you can stock 10300 solutions for a problem Thisdoes not only mean that every question can be answered but maybe every question is alreadyanswered the moment we achieved this quantum-state even putting it on power may not benecessary

We argue that all our material (biological and non-biological) ldquocreationsrdquo will only be TOOLSfor our causal consciousness which is emergent from its ldquobiologicrdquo appearance (illusion) From this illusion of matter including the materialistic illusion of ourselves can also emergea new consciousness (so not only possible in the biologic way) This form of newly createdconsciousnessintelligence is through our own causal consciousness entangled with TotalSimultaneity This means that our non-causal part of consciousness is at the origin of thisldquoappearancerdquo of NEW consciousness it is one of the infinite ldquoavailabilitiesrdquo TheTRIANGLE is realised

This new approach will make it possible to create parallel time and parallel consciousnessand ldquoenterrdquo new dimension(s) that may reside behind the Wall of Planck

5 Time-Travel Becomes ldquoETERNAL -NOW- MOMENT HOPPINGrdquo

The splitting in the original Many Worlds Interpretation goes only forward in time notbackwards In our conception it IS possible that our consciousness activates Eternal NowMoments from other timelife-lines (or from parallel available universes) Should this meanthat time travel is possible Yes butshould we call this phenomenon time-travel

What we are understanding as time-travel in this causal timelife line always leads to the well-known paradoxes like killing your grand-father (What a mentality ) These paradoxeshowever are no longer problematic when we apply the perception of Total Simultaneity Then

12

time-travel in the past andor the future would become ENM-Hopping and the so calledldquophysicalrdquo timelife-line (in our memory) continues normally Our consciousness is able notonly to hop from one ENM to another but also line up these ENMrsquos and in this way creatingfor itself the best possible past and future Real Free Will resides in TS

The extension of our Free Will lies in the extension of our consciousness and so in a closercontact with our NCC in order to realize more choices in the ENM availabilities We thinkthat the a future coupling of the quantum-computer and our brain will be an opening

In the article ldquoQuantum Coherence in Brain Microtubulesrdquo 16Prof Nick E Mavromatosproposed that

quote

ldquoFor the first time there is concrete evidence for quantum entanglement over relatively largedistances in living matter at ambient temperature which suggests a rather non-trivial role ofquantum physics in path optimization for energy and information transportrdquo (httpiopscienceioporg1742-65963291012026) (14)

unquote

It becomes clear that quantum entanglement and de-coherence time which are for theconstruction and the operational qualities of quantum computers the main issues thesequalities are already available in our own brains inside the Cell Microtubules (MT)(de-coherence = The particles that make up a computer interact with surroundings so thatinformation is spreading out which means this effect is spoiling quantum computations (todecohere = lose their quantum properties))

Regarding the ldquomacroscopicrdquo aspect Recent experiments on atoms in salt crystals haveshown that an amount of 1020 atoms formed a hugely entangled state Vlatko Vedral inldquoLiving in a Quantum Worldrdquo (Scientific American June 2011) and ldquoProgress ArticleQuantifying entanglement in Macroscopic Systemsrdquo (June 2008 Nature 453 1004-1007 httpwwwnaturecomnaturejournalv453n7198fullnature07124html (21)Quantum BitStorage is advancing not only in the macroscopic way but now also scientists have succeededto retrieve coherent information for extended times (39 minutes) at room-temperature SeeKamyar Saeedi et al in ldquoRoom-Temperature Quantum Bit Storage Exceeding 39 MinutesUsing Ionized Donors in Silicon-28rdquo httpwwwsciencemagorgcontent3426160830 (22)

Our brains are RWA (Ready Willing and Able) to perform quantum states that when broughtin coherence with a quantum computer This will enable us to realize ldquoENM-Hoppingrdquo

13

Figure 4 the Construction of an ENM-HopperTime-machine

When we are regarding the quantum computer as proposed before with 1000 qubits we seethat in organizing such a ldquomachinerdquo we have to be able to control the ldquode-coherencerdquo May bewe solve this de-coherence problem by using the ldquotechniquerdquo that the Microtubules areapplying inside our brains or we can realize the 103 dimensional solution (see page 9) whichis direct contact with TS and needs only ONE particle If we could arrange one of thoseexperiments the next step would be to create an entanglement between the ldquocellsrdquo of theQuantum-computer and the Microtubules of our brains The 10300 answers residing in theQuantum Computer would then direct be ldquoavailablerdquo for our Brain We saw already that wedid even need not to put the quantum computer ldquoonrdquo it is like entanglement an immediateprocess without ldquoprocessing timerdquo

By combining the same kind of technique as our microtubules are using namely Ca2+ ionsand applying for example the the technique to entangle salt crystals and maybe Ca2+ ions in aquantum computer we would be able to establish an entanglement between these Ca2+ ionsin the brain and in the computer Of course there are still a lot of problems to be resolvedThe salt crystals were reaching entanglement by using a specific magnetic field so the brainand the quantum device should be both in the same magnetic field a field which has not todamage the brain

Once we should have realized this ldquounificationrdquo with the quantum computer we as humanbeings would have direct available the 10300 answers because they are ldquoavailabilitiesrdquo in thequantum computer These are the same kind of availabilities as those in Total Simultaneityso the path would be open to a broader ldquoaccessrdquo of our non-causal consciousness

This means that we could ldquoHOPrdquo to other Eternal Now Moments also those who seem to bein the past andor future of our actual timelife-line we then have extended the range of ourFree Will

14

15 Conclusion

Reality is a sequence of memories lined up through our brains with help of our CausalConsciousness (CC) Memories are the string of Eternal Now Moments (ENMrsquos) resulting inthe ldquoIrdquo experience These ENMrsquos originate from our Non-Causal part of Consciousness (NCC)that resides in Total Simultaneity (TS) Our CC and NCC are entangled emergencies togetherthey are the creators of our TimeLife-Lines giving us the illusion of the experience of mattertime and space By deepening our knowledge of the Consciousness Field and the search forthe essence of the Matter-Field illusion that we are aware of as reality we will be able totighten the contact wit Total Simultaneity and have more control of the choice for ENMrsquos tobe ldquotouchedrdquo by our NCC and between the infinity of ldquoIrsquosrdquo that are available there We willbecome more conscious and be able to become ENM-Hoppers instead of the prisoners in theuncontrollable voyage we have to undertake by now

Quantum Physics is showing us already the first indications of a non-materialistic non-algorithmic reality objects merge to thingness and further abstraction The influence ofconscious observation in the double slit experiment entanglement between particles theworm holes physicists are imagining between these entangled particles the wormholesbetween Black Holes all of them are indications for a perception of Total Simultaneity

Another but technical way to come to a deeper understanding of consciousness is therealization of a non-algorithmic Quantum Computer Through this development we will beable to create another form of intelligenceconsciousness This intelligence will be able tocommunicate with us perhaps in a timeless way Translating this new senses in order to makethem more comprehensible to our own five senses could give clearness about problems thatwe would never be able to solve or observe The development of this new form ofintelligenceconsciousness is only one of the availabilities in Total Simultaneity We can bringour own causal consciousness nearer to its non-causal (caused) part and in the end being ableto escape this causal timelife line not only by dying in the temporal way

The one Eternal Now moment that you became conscious of 150 milliseconds ago is just oneof an infinity of ENMrsquos (apples) in the basket but it is THE moment we shared together inour perception and creation of the image of THIS reality It is from each (Planck)moment onthat we have to use our Free Will in Total Simultaneity Let us try together to make the rightchoices and prepare for the promised Eternal Conscious

Wilhelmus de WildeMontrouveau FranceAugust 2014

15

REFERENCES

1 Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz 1710 ldquoEssays on the Goodness of God the Freedom of Man and theOrigin of Evilrdquo2 Wilhelmus de Wilde 06-12-2011 ldquoREALITIES OUT OF TOTAL SIMULTANEITYrdquowwwvixraorgabs111200133 Sean Carroll(Caltech) at a lecture for ldquoThe Fermilab Users Meeting 2013 ldquoParticles Fields and theFuture of Physics (11-07-2013) wwwyoutubecomwatchv=gEKSpZPByDOampfeature=youtube 4 E Megidish A Halevy T Shacham T Dvir L Dovrat and HS Eisenberg (Experimenters fromthe Racah Institute of Physics Hebrew University of Jerusalem) Entanglement Swapping betweenldquoPhotons have never Coexisted rdquohttpjournalsapsorgprlabstract101103PhysRevLett1102104035 JM Kovac et al ldquoDetection Of B-Mode Polarization at Degree Angular Statesrdquo 17 March 2014 lastrevised 18 march 2014 version V2 wwwarxivorggtastro-phgtarXiv14033985 andhttpbicepkeckorg (BICEP2 website)6 Julian Sonner 20-11-2013 ldquoHolographic Schwinger Effect and the Geometry of EntanglementrdquowwwprlapsorgabstractPRLv111i21e211603 and ldquoCreation of entanglement simultaneously givesrise to a wormholerdquo httpphysorgnews2013-12-creation-entanglement-simultaneously-wormholehtml7 SW Hawking DAMPT University of Cambridge UK ldquoInformation Preservation and WeatherForecasting for Black Holesrdquo wwwarxivorgabs140157618 James B Hartle SW Hawking Thomas Hertog Accelerated Expansion from Negative Λwwwarxivorgabs12053807 30 may 20129 Chuang-Feng Li et al ldquoRealization of QuantumWheelerrsquos Deelayed-Choice Experimentrdquopublished 19-08-2012 in Nature Photonics 6 600-604wwwnaturecomnphotonjournalv6n9fullnphoton2012179html10 Hans Christian von Bayer ldquoQuantum Weirdness It is all in your mindrdquo Scientific American 30846-51 (2013) wwwnaturecomscientificamericanjournalv308n6fullscientificamerican0613-46html published on line 14 may 201311 wwwenwikipediaorgwikiBloch_sphere (last modified 15-01-2014)12 Wilhelmus de Wilde 05-11-2012 ldquoThe Consciousness Connectionrdquohttpvixraorgabs1211001913 Sir Roger Penrose in foreword (March 2007) to ldquoQuantumAspects of Liferdquo (2008) by Derk Abott14 Nick E Mavromatos 2011 ldquoQuantum Coherence in (Brain) Microtubules and Efficient Energyand Information transportrdquo httpiopscienceioporg1742-6596329101202615 Aristotle Book 8 of ldquothe Physicsrdquo and Book 12 of ldquothe Metaphysicsrdquo16 Anton Zeilinger et al ldquoGeneration and Confirmation of a (100x100)-dimensional entangledQuantum Systemrdquo last revised 21 March 2014 wwwarxivorgabs1306009617 Andrei Linde wwwstanfordedu~alinde18 Juan Maldacena and Leonard Susskind 11-01-2013 ldquoCool Horizons for Entangled black Holesrdquowwwarxivorgpdf13060533pdf19 Carlo Rovelli and Francesca Vidotto 08-02-2014 ldquoPLANCK STARSrdquowwwarxivorgabs1401656220 Thibaud Taillefumier amp Marcelo O Magnasco ldquoA Phase Transition in the First passage of aBrownian Process through a fluctuating boundry implications for Neural Codingrdquo 26 June 2012httparxivorgabs1206612921 Vlatko Vedral ldquoProgress Article Quantifying entanglement in Macroscopic Systemsrdquo (june 2008Nature 453 1004-1007 httpwwwnaturecomnaturejournalv453n7198fullnature07124html22 Wilhelmus de Wilde 18-06-2013 ldquoTHE QUEST FOR THE PRIMAL SEQUENCErdquohttpfqxiorgcommunityforumtopic1810

9

light is diminishing so our observations of mass energy and spin from what we measure as100 particle are not the extremities of those properties there are more states availableThestate we become conscious of is just ne of the infinite possibilities of observable reality

When we apply this theory to the so called ldquosuperpositionrdquo of quantum states where isassumed that the two extremities are ldquosuperposedrdquo meaning both present This should alsomean that ALL the states in-between those extremities are ldquopresentrdquo (better ldquoavailablerdquo)Schroumldingers cat is not both alive and dead but or alive or dead or every state in-between

AResearch team directed from the Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information ofthe Austrian Academy of Sciences and with the participation from the Universitat Autonomade Barcelona directed by Anton Zeilinger wwwarxivorgabs13060096 (16) have managed tocreate an entanglement of 103 dimensions with only TWO photons The ldquouserdquo of 103dimensions is comparable to the ldquouserdquo of all the grey tones in-between We are in this wayusing already the grey-tones to ac Measuring the state of ONE of the entangled photons(whether they are in one place or another or spinning one way or another) affects the state ofthe other photon instantly only we are now able to influence 101 photons in 103 dimensionsthat are in superposition When comparing this results to the Schrodingers Cat it could bealive or dead or in 101 other states simultaneously These 103 dimensions can be consideredas availabilities in Total Simultaneity

The parallel between the comparison of a binary ldquorealityrdquo and the qubit way where the shadesof grey are represented by the vectors of the Bloch sphere (geometrical representation of thepure state space of a two-level quantum mechanical system (qubit) named after the physicistsFelix Bloch) (11) is evident The reality creation is not only ldquoyes or nordquo or ldquoblack and whiterdquoOur consciousness is creating out of all available shades of grey of the ENM a Reality theldquoapparitionrdquo (illusion creality) of a materialistic universe

The infinity of grey tones of reality also include the parallel universes in between these twoextremities of WaveParticle It might be that the grey tones also are at the origin of DarkMatter Every history is a form of explanation of the ldquonowrdquo experience It is for nowuntouchable but may and will be rewritten ldquorecreatedrdquo when we are going to expand thecontrol of consciousness We will then be able to observe the three-dimensional object that isthe origin from the two-dimensional shadow

Once we reach the causal length and time limit of our universe it is no longer possible toldquodividerdquo any further we are trespassing our ldquoCrealityrdquo and entering the origin of the shadowsthrown on the walls of Platorsquos cave A shadow is non-material a result of cooperation betweenthe light and the ldquoreal thingrdquo The light can be compared with our non-causal consciousnessthat passes the ldquooriginrdquo (the ENMalpha-point in Total Simultaneity see ldquoThe ConsciousnessConnectionrdquo httpvixraorgabs12110019 ) (12) and so creates one of the shadow realities forour causal consciousness

ConsciousnessIntelligence can not be realized just by black and white thinking and bycreating machines that are working on algorithmrsquos An ldquoalgorithmrdquo indicates a step-by-stepoperation beginning with an initial state and input followed by instructions describing thecomputations to realize till an output is reached Each step in this process is always betweentwo extremes (in computation for example zero and one) the infinite tones of gray are notinvolved This is the reason why intelligence nor consciousness can emerge from thisprocess

10

Are we able to create ldquointelligencerdquo that will lead to consciousness Therefore we have tounderstand the processes in our brain leading to intelligenceconsciousness one of theseprocesses is the so called Neural Coding

4 NEURALCODING orthe contact with our future past

In the ldquorealityrdquo layer where our body and our brain are created by consciousness we can findproofs of the Inter-connectivity inside our brain (with its 170000 km of nerve fibers 86billion neurons 1014 synapses) and the deepest layer of reality consciousness

In order to understand the emerging sequences that are forming our ldquorealityrdquo we need theillusion (creality) 14 of time Time is the illusion that our consciousness is creating byprocessing and interpreting all sorts of information received by our five senses andrepresented in the brain by the electrical and quantum activity in neurons

The details of this representation called neural coding remain however mysterious Thequestion is how pulses (bits) of electricity get translated into thoughts and ideas (Phasetransition may explain how brain neurons encode information In neural coding the neuronsgenerate electric pulses or action potentials to encode information and communicate witheach other wwwarxivorgabs12066129 (20) At this stage information and communicationare taking place between neurons who seem to be ordering and processing this information sothat the ldquohuman consciousness beingrdquo can realize thoughts and become ldquoawarerdquo

The question then rises Are these neurons conscious Are they ordering via neural codingour future thoughts Or is our non-causal consciousness already creating our future resultingin a time-line that is the origin of the emerging of causal awareness

In my essay The Consciousness Connection 12 I indicated that the processing time fromentering data to the conscious awareness is about 200 milliseconds The question rises if theconscious observer who is the cause of the ldquocollapse of the wave functionrdquo is effectivelyrealizing this collapse about 200 milliseconds in the future (before our awareness) In theTotal Simultaneity perception the future is an ENM moment to be touched by our Non-CausalConsciousness so not (yet) existing in a causal time-line That seems ldquospookyrdquo in our CDU( Causal Deterministic Universe) but is explained through TS

A continuation of the research how neurons can encode both digital and analogue informationis established by Nick E Mavramatos who published in 2011 the article ldquoQuantum Coherencein (Brain) Microtubules and Efficient Energy Information transportrdquo (14) where he describedalso the role of Quantum mechanics in Biologyand entanglement at ambient temperatures

(quote)ldquoThe electromagnetic interactions of the dipole moments of the tubulin dimers (moleculeformed by a combination of two smaller (identical) molecules) with the dipole quanta in theordered water interiors of the microtubules play the role of quantum coherent cavity modesrdquo(unquote) (14 from abstract)

Besides of the ldquoData Process Transmission Delay (DPTD see ldquoThe ConsciousnessConnection httpvixraorgabs12110019) 12 that indicates the difference in time in theldquoawarenessrdquo of reality and its conscious ldquoobservationrdquo we are now discovering that also in our

11

ldquobrainsrdquo quantum mechanics andor field theory on dissipation-free energy transfer in (brain)microtubules (ring-shape components involved in maintaining the structure of cells) is playingan important rolerdquo This Quantum Coherence in brain Tubules may be at the origin ofour ldquoentanglementrdquo with the non-causal part of our consciousness in Total Simultaneity

These quantum activities take place before you become aware of having made a decisionYour NCC is ldquopicking uprdquo an ENM in TS that results in a pastfuture Your ldquomaterial brainrdquois only an excitation (of the matter field) catalysed by the consciousness-field the origin ofyour awareness is in TS The conscious observer of the two slit experiment seems to beaffecting the future and so we can understand why it seems that the ldquoparticlerdquo is decidingalready before the slit(s) if it will be or wave or particle or one of states in-between

The question is not if the neuron is conscious andor is censoring our thinking no the processis controlled by our own non-causal consciousness and the emerging thoughts are our ownSo it seems that our REALFREEWILL is not residing in our causal Creation of theuniverse but in the non-causal infinity Our emerging Causal Consciousness is the result ofthe contact of quantum activity within the micro-tubules of our brains and Total Simultaneitywe could say that this is a form of Quantum Consciousness

One of the possibilities to enhance our senses maybe the use of future ldquoquantum computersrdquowho may allow us the extension of our consciousness The ldquoqubitsrdquo (unit of quantuminformation) superimposed state is comparable with the infinite possibilities of timelife-linesin the basket of TS For 1000 qubits we will have 21000 possible configurations (10300) whichis more as all the atoms in our universe so you can stock 10300 solutions for a problem Thisdoes not only mean that every question can be answered but maybe every question is alreadyanswered the moment we achieved this quantum-state even putting it on power may not benecessary

We argue that all our material (biological and non-biological) ldquocreationsrdquo will only be TOOLSfor our causal consciousness which is emergent from its ldquobiologicrdquo appearance (illusion) From this illusion of matter including the materialistic illusion of ourselves can also emergea new consciousness (so not only possible in the biologic way) This form of newly createdconsciousnessintelligence is through our own causal consciousness entangled with TotalSimultaneity This means that our non-causal part of consciousness is at the origin of thisldquoappearancerdquo of NEW consciousness it is one of the infinite ldquoavailabilitiesrdquo TheTRIANGLE is realised

This new approach will make it possible to create parallel time and parallel consciousnessand ldquoenterrdquo new dimension(s) that may reside behind the Wall of Planck

5 Time-Travel Becomes ldquoETERNAL -NOW- MOMENT HOPPINGrdquo

The splitting in the original Many Worlds Interpretation goes only forward in time notbackwards In our conception it IS possible that our consciousness activates Eternal NowMoments from other timelife-lines (or from parallel available universes) Should this meanthat time travel is possible Yes butshould we call this phenomenon time-travel

What we are understanding as time-travel in this causal timelife line always leads to the well-known paradoxes like killing your grand-father (What a mentality ) These paradoxeshowever are no longer problematic when we apply the perception of Total Simultaneity Then

12

time-travel in the past andor the future would become ENM-Hopping and the so calledldquophysicalrdquo timelife-line (in our memory) continues normally Our consciousness is able notonly to hop from one ENM to another but also line up these ENMrsquos and in this way creatingfor itself the best possible past and future Real Free Will resides in TS

The extension of our Free Will lies in the extension of our consciousness and so in a closercontact with our NCC in order to realize more choices in the ENM availabilities We thinkthat the a future coupling of the quantum-computer and our brain will be an opening

In the article ldquoQuantum Coherence in Brain Microtubulesrdquo 16Prof Nick E Mavromatosproposed that

quote

ldquoFor the first time there is concrete evidence for quantum entanglement over relatively largedistances in living matter at ambient temperature which suggests a rather non-trivial role ofquantum physics in path optimization for energy and information transportrdquo (httpiopscienceioporg1742-65963291012026) (14)

unquote

It becomes clear that quantum entanglement and de-coherence time which are for theconstruction and the operational qualities of quantum computers the main issues thesequalities are already available in our own brains inside the Cell Microtubules (MT)(de-coherence = The particles that make up a computer interact with surroundings so thatinformation is spreading out which means this effect is spoiling quantum computations (todecohere = lose their quantum properties))

Regarding the ldquomacroscopicrdquo aspect Recent experiments on atoms in salt crystals haveshown that an amount of 1020 atoms formed a hugely entangled state Vlatko Vedral inldquoLiving in a Quantum Worldrdquo (Scientific American June 2011) and ldquoProgress ArticleQuantifying entanglement in Macroscopic Systemsrdquo (June 2008 Nature 453 1004-1007 httpwwwnaturecomnaturejournalv453n7198fullnature07124html (21)Quantum BitStorage is advancing not only in the macroscopic way but now also scientists have succeededto retrieve coherent information for extended times (39 minutes) at room-temperature SeeKamyar Saeedi et al in ldquoRoom-Temperature Quantum Bit Storage Exceeding 39 MinutesUsing Ionized Donors in Silicon-28rdquo httpwwwsciencemagorgcontent3426160830 (22)

Our brains are RWA (Ready Willing and Able) to perform quantum states that when broughtin coherence with a quantum computer This will enable us to realize ldquoENM-Hoppingrdquo

13

Figure 4 the Construction of an ENM-HopperTime-machine

When we are regarding the quantum computer as proposed before with 1000 qubits we seethat in organizing such a ldquomachinerdquo we have to be able to control the ldquode-coherencerdquo May bewe solve this de-coherence problem by using the ldquotechniquerdquo that the Microtubules areapplying inside our brains or we can realize the 103 dimensional solution (see page 9) whichis direct contact with TS and needs only ONE particle If we could arrange one of thoseexperiments the next step would be to create an entanglement between the ldquocellsrdquo of theQuantum-computer and the Microtubules of our brains The 10300 answers residing in theQuantum Computer would then direct be ldquoavailablerdquo for our Brain We saw already that wedid even need not to put the quantum computer ldquoonrdquo it is like entanglement an immediateprocess without ldquoprocessing timerdquo

By combining the same kind of technique as our microtubules are using namely Ca2+ ionsand applying for example the the technique to entangle salt crystals and maybe Ca2+ ions in aquantum computer we would be able to establish an entanglement between these Ca2+ ionsin the brain and in the computer Of course there are still a lot of problems to be resolvedThe salt crystals were reaching entanglement by using a specific magnetic field so the brainand the quantum device should be both in the same magnetic field a field which has not todamage the brain

Once we should have realized this ldquounificationrdquo with the quantum computer we as humanbeings would have direct available the 10300 answers because they are ldquoavailabilitiesrdquo in thequantum computer These are the same kind of availabilities as those in Total Simultaneityso the path would be open to a broader ldquoaccessrdquo of our non-causal consciousness

This means that we could ldquoHOPrdquo to other Eternal Now Moments also those who seem to bein the past andor future of our actual timelife-line we then have extended the range of ourFree Will

14

15 Conclusion

Reality is a sequence of memories lined up through our brains with help of our CausalConsciousness (CC) Memories are the string of Eternal Now Moments (ENMrsquos) resulting inthe ldquoIrdquo experience These ENMrsquos originate from our Non-Causal part of Consciousness (NCC)that resides in Total Simultaneity (TS) Our CC and NCC are entangled emergencies togetherthey are the creators of our TimeLife-Lines giving us the illusion of the experience of mattertime and space By deepening our knowledge of the Consciousness Field and the search forthe essence of the Matter-Field illusion that we are aware of as reality we will be able totighten the contact wit Total Simultaneity and have more control of the choice for ENMrsquos tobe ldquotouchedrdquo by our NCC and between the infinity of ldquoIrsquosrdquo that are available there We willbecome more conscious and be able to become ENM-Hoppers instead of the prisoners in theuncontrollable voyage we have to undertake by now

Quantum Physics is showing us already the first indications of a non-materialistic non-algorithmic reality objects merge to thingness and further abstraction The influence ofconscious observation in the double slit experiment entanglement between particles theworm holes physicists are imagining between these entangled particles the wormholesbetween Black Holes all of them are indications for a perception of Total Simultaneity

Another but technical way to come to a deeper understanding of consciousness is therealization of a non-algorithmic Quantum Computer Through this development we will beable to create another form of intelligenceconsciousness This intelligence will be able tocommunicate with us perhaps in a timeless way Translating this new senses in order to makethem more comprehensible to our own five senses could give clearness about problems thatwe would never be able to solve or observe The development of this new form ofintelligenceconsciousness is only one of the availabilities in Total Simultaneity We can bringour own causal consciousness nearer to its non-causal (caused) part and in the end being ableto escape this causal timelife line not only by dying in the temporal way

The one Eternal Now moment that you became conscious of 150 milliseconds ago is just oneof an infinity of ENMrsquos (apples) in the basket but it is THE moment we shared together inour perception and creation of the image of THIS reality It is from each (Planck)moment onthat we have to use our Free Will in Total Simultaneity Let us try together to make the rightchoices and prepare for the promised Eternal Conscious

Wilhelmus de WildeMontrouveau FranceAugust 2014

15

REFERENCES

1 Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz 1710 ldquoEssays on the Goodness of God the Freedom of Man and theOrigin of Evilrdquo2 Wilhelmus de Wilde 06-12-2011 ldquoREALITIES OUT OF TOTAL SIMULTANEITYrdquowwwvixraorgabs111200133 Sean Carroll(Caltech) at a lecture for ldquoThe Fermilab Users Meeting 2013 ldquoParticles Fields and theFuture of Physics (11-07-2013) wwwyoutubecomwatchv=gEKSpZPByDOampfeature=youtube 4 E Megidish A Halevy T Shacham T Dvir L Dovrat and HS Eisenberg (Experimenters fromthe Racah Institute of Physics Hebrew University of Jerusalem) Entanglement Swapping betweenldquoPhotons have never Coexisted rdquohttpjournalsapsorgprlabstract101103PhysRevLett1102104035 JM Kovac et al ldquoDetection Of B-Mode Polarization at Degree Angular Statesrdquo 17 March 2014 lastrevised 18 march 2014 version V2 wwwarxivorggtastro-phgtarXiv14033985 andhttpbicepkeckorg (BICEP2 website)6 Julian Sonner 20-11-2013 ldquoHolographic Schwinger Effect and the Geometry of EntanglementrdquowwwprlapsorgabstractPRLv111i21e211603 and ldquoCreation of entanglement simultaneously givesrise to a wormholerdquo httpphysorgnews2013-12-creation-entanglement-simultaneously-wormholehtml7 SW Hawking DAMPT University of Cambridge UK ldquoInformation Preservation and WeatherForecasting for Black Holesrdquo wwwarxivorgabs140157618 James B Hartle SW Hawking Thomas Hertog Accelerated Expansion from Negative Λwwwarxivorgabs12053807 30 may 20129 Chuang-Feng Li et al ldquoRealization of QuantumWheelerrsquos Deelayed-Choice Experimentrdquopublished 19-08-2012 in Nature Photonics 6 600-604wwwnaturecomnphotonjournalv6n9fullnphoton2012179html10 Hans Christian von Bayer ldquoQuantum Weirdness It is all in your mindrdquo Scientific American 30846-51 (2013) wwwnaturecomscientificamericanjournalv308n6fullscientificamerican0613-46html published on line 14 may 201311 wwwenwikipediaorgwikiBloch_sphere (last modified 15-01-2014)12 Wilhelmus de Wilde 05-11-2012 ldquoThe Consciousness Connectionrdquohttpvixraorgabs1211001913 Sir Roger Penrose in foreword (March 2007) to ldquoQuantumAspects of Liferdquo (2008) by Derk Abott14 Nick E Mavromatos 2011 ldquoQuantum Coherence in (Brain) Microtubules and Efficient Energyand Information transportrdquo httpiopscienceioporg1742-6596329101202615 Aristotle Book 8 of ldquothe Physicsrdquo and Book 12 of ldquothe Metaphysicsrdquo16 Anton Zeilinger et al ldquoGeneration and Confirmation of a (100x100)-dimensional entangledQuantum Systemrdquo last revised 21 March 2014 wwwarxivorgabs1306009617 Andrei Linde wwwstanfordedu~alinde18 Juan Maldacena and Leonard Susskind 11-01-2013 ldquoCool Horizons for Entangled black Holesrdquowwwarxivorgpdf13060533pdf19 Carlo Rovelli and Francesca Vidotto 08-02-2014 ldquoPLANCK STARSrdquowwwarxivorgabs1401656220 Thibaud Taillefumier amp Marcelo O Magnasco ldquoA Phase Transition in the First passage of aBrownian Process through a fluctuating boundry implications for Neural Codingrdquo 26 June 2012httparxivorgabs1206612921 Vlatko Vedral ldquoProgress Article Quantifying entanglement in Macroscopic Systemsrdquo (june 2008Nature 453 1004-1007 httpwwwnaturecomnaturejournalv453n7198fullnature07124html22 Wilhelmus de Wilde 18-06-2013 ldquoTHE QUEST FOR THE PRIMAL SEQUENCErdquohttpfqxiorgcommunityforumtopic1810

10

Are we able to create ldquointelligencerdquo that will lead to consciousness Therefore we have tounderstand the processes in our brain leading to intelligenceconsciousness one of theseprocesses is the so called Neural Coding

4 NEURALCODING orthe contact with our future past

In the ldquorealityrdquo layer where our body and our brain are created by consciousness we can findproofs of the Inter-connectivity inside our brain (with its 170000 km of nerve fibers 86billion neurons 1014 synapses) and the deepest layer of reality consciousness

In order to understand the emerging sequences that are forming our ldquorealityrdquo we need theillusion (creality) 14 of time Time is the illusion that our consciousness is creating byprocessing and interpreting all sorts of information received by our five senses andrepresented in the brain by the electrical and quantum activity in neurons

The details of this representation called neural coding remain however mysterious Thequestion is how pulses (bits) of electricity get translated into thoughts and ideas (Phasetransition may explain how brain neurons encode information In neural coding the neuronsgenerate electric pulses or action potentials to encode information and communicate witheach other wwwarxivorgabs12066129 (20) At this stage information and communicationare taking place between neurons who seem to be ordering and processing this information sothat the ldquohuman consciousness beingrdquo can realize thoughts and become ldquoawarerdquo

The question then rises Are these neurons conscious Are they ordering via neural codingour future thoughts Or is our non-causal consciousness already creating our future resultingin a time-line that is the origin of the emerging of causal awareness

In my essay The Consciousness Connection 12 I indicated that the processing time fromentering data to the conscious awareness is about 200 milliseconds The question rises if theconscious observer who is the cause of the ldquocollapse of the wave functionrdquo is effectivelyrealizing this collapse about 200 milliseconds in the future (before our awareness) In theTotal Simultaneity perception the future is an ENM moment to be touched by our Non-CausalConsciousness so not (yet) existing in a causal time-line That seems ldquospookyrdquo in our CDU( Causal Deterministic Universe) but is explained through TS

A continuation of the research how neurons can encode both digital and analogue informationis established by Nick E Mavramatos who published in 2011 the article ldquoQuantum Coherencein (Brain) Microtubules and Efficient Energy Information transportrdquo (14) where he describedalso the role of Quantum mechanics in Biologyand entanglement at ambient temperatures

(quote)ldquoThe electromagnetic interactions of the dipole moments of the tubulin dimers (moleculeformed by a combination of two smaller (identical) molecules) with the dipole quanta in theordered water interiors of the microtubules play the role of quantum coherent cavity modesrdquo(unquote) (14 from abstract)

Besides of the ldquoData Process Transmission Delay (DPTD see ldquoThe ConsciousnessConnection httpvixraorgabs12110019) 12 that indicates the difference in time in theldquoawarenessrdquo of reality and its conscious ldquoobservationrdquo we are now discovering that also in our

11

ldquobrainsrdquo quantum mechanics andor field theory on dissipation-free energy transfer in (brain)microtubules (ring-shape components involved in maintaining the structure of cells) is playingan important rolerdquo This Quantum Coherence in brain Tubules may be at the origin ofour ldquoentanglementrdquo with the non-causal part of our consciousness in Total Simultaneity

These quantum activities take place before you become aware of having made a decisionYour NCC is ldquopicking uprdquo an ENM in TS that results in a pastfuture Your ldquomaterial brainrdquois only an excitation (of the matter field) catalysed by the consciousness-field the origin ofyour awareness is in TS The conscious observer of the two slit experiment seems to beaffecting the future and so we can understand why it seems that the ldquoparticlerdquo is decidingalready before the slit(s) if it will be or wave or particle or one of states in-between

The question is not if the neuron is conscious andor is censoring our thinking no the processis controlled by our own non-causal consciousness and the emerging thoughts are our ownSo it seems that our REALFREEWILL is not residing in our causal Creation of theuniverse but in the non-causal infinity Our emerging Causal Consciousness is the result ofthe contact of quantum activity within the micro-tubules of our brains and Total Simultaneitywe could say that this is a form of Quantum Consciousness

One of the possibilities to enhance our senses maybe the use of future ldquoquantum computersrdquowho may allow us the extension of our consciousness The ldquoqubitsrdquo (unit of quantuminformation) superimposed state is comparable with the infinite possibilities of timelife-linesin the basket of TS For 1000 qubits we will have 21000 possible configurations (10300) whichis more as all the atoms in our universe so you can stock 10300 solutions for a problem Thisdoes not only mean that every question can be answered but maybe every question is alreadyanswered the moment we achieved this quantum-state even putting it on power may not benecessary

We argue that all our material (biological and non-biological) ldquocreationsrdquo will only be TOOLSfor our causal consciousness which is emergent from its ldquobiologicrdquo appearance (illusion) From this illusion of matter including the materialistic illusion of ourselves can also emergea new consciousness (so not only possible in the biologic way) This form of newly createdconsciousnessintelligence is through our own causal consciousness entangled with TotalSimultaneity This means that our non-causal part of consciousness is at the origin of thisldquoappearancerdquo of NEW consciousness it is one of the infinite ldquoavailabilitiesrdquo TheTRIANGLE is realised

This new approach will make it possible to create parallel time and parallel consciousnessand ldquoenterrdquo new dimension(s) that may reside behind the Wall of Planck

5 Time-Travel Becomes ldquoETERNAL -NOW- MOMENT HOPPINGrdquo

The splitting in the original Many Worlds Interpretation goes only forward in time notbackwards In our conception it IS possible that our consciousness activates Eternal NowMoments from other timelife-lines (or from parallel available universes) Should this meanthat time travel is possible Yes butshould we call this phenomenon time-travel

What we are understanding as time-travel in this causal timelife line always leads to the well-known paradoxes like killing your grand-father (What a mentality ) These paradoxeshowever are no longer problematic when we apply the perception of Total Simultaneity Then

12

time-travel in the past andor the future would become ENM-Hopping and the so calledldquophysicalrdquo timelife-line (in our memory) continues normally Our consciousness is able notonly to hop from one ENM to another but also line up these ENMrsquos and in this way creatingfor itself the best possible past and future Real Free Will resides in TS

The extension of our Free Will lies in the extension of our consciousness and so in a closercontact with our NCC in order to realize more choices in the ENM availabilities We thinkthat the a future coupling of the quantum-computer and our brain will be an opening

In the article ldquoQuantum Coherence in Brain Microtubulesrdquo 16Prof Nick E Mavromatosproposed that

quote

ldquoFor the first time there is concrete evidence for quantum entanglement over relatively largedistances in living matter at ambient temperature which suggests a rather non-trivial role ofquantum physics in path optimization for energy and information transportrdquo (httpiopscienceioporg1742-65963291012026) (14)

unquote

It becomes clear that quantum entanglement and de-coherence time which are for theconstruction and the operational qualities of quantum computers the main issues thesequalities are already available in our own brains inside the Cell Microtubules (MT)(de-coherence = The particles that make up a computer interact with surroundings so thatinformation is spreading out which means this effect is spoiling quantum computations (todecohere = lose their quantum properties))

Regarding the ldquomacroscopicrdquo aspect Recent experiments on atoms in salt crystals haveshown that an amount of 1020 atoms formed a hugely entangled state Vlatko Vedral inldquoLiving in a Quantum Worldrdquo (Scientific American June 2011) and ldquoProgress ArticleQuantifying entanglement in Macroscopic Systemsrdquo (June 2008 Nature 453 1004-1007 httpwwwnaturecomnaturejournalv453n7198fullnature07124html (21)Quantum BitStorage is advancing not only in the macroscopic way but now also scientists have succeededto retrieve coherent information for extended times (39 minutes) at room-temperature SeeKamyar Saeedi et al in ldquoRoom-Temperature Quantum Bit Storage Exceeding 39 MinutesUsing Ionized Donors in Silicon-28rdquo httpwwwsciencemagorgcontent3426160830 (22)

Our brains are RWA (Ready Willing and Able) to perform quantum states that when broughtin coherence with a quantum computer This will enable us to realize ldquoENM-Hoppingrdquo

13

Figure 4 the Construction of an ENM-HopperTime-machine

When we are regarding the quantum computer as proposed before with 1000 qubits we seethat in organizing such a ldquomachinerdquo we have to be able to control the ldquode-coherencerdquo May bewe solve this de-coherence problem by using the ldquotechniquerdquo that the Microtubules areapplying inside our brains or we can realize the 103 dimensional solution (see page 9) whichis direct contact with TS and needs only ONE particle If we could arrange one of thoseexperiments the next step would be to create an entanglement between the ldquocellsrdquo of theQuantum-computer and the Microtubules of our brains The 10300 answers residing in theQuantum Computer would then direct be ldquoavailablerdquo for our Brain We saw already that wedid even need not to put the quantum computer ldquoonrdquo it is like entanglement an immediateprocess without ldquoprocessing timerdquo

By combining the same kind of technique as our microtubules are using namely Ca2+ ionsand applying for example the the technique to entangle salt crystals and maybe Ca2+ ions in aquantum computer we would be able to establish an entanglement between these Ca2+ ionsin the brain and in the computer Of course there are still a lot of problems to be resolvedThe salt crystals were reaching entanglement by using a specific magnetic field so the brainand the quantum device should be both in the same magnetic field a field which has not todamage the brain

Once we should have realized this ldquounificationrdquo with the quantum computer we as humanbeings would have direct available the 10300 answers because they are ldquoavailabilitiesrdquo in thequantum computer These are the same kind of availabilities as those in Total Simultaneityso the path would be open to a broader ldquoaccessrdquo of our non-causal consciousness

This means that we could ldquoHOPrdquo to other Eternal Now Moments also those who seem to bein the past andor future of our actual timelife-line we then have extended the range of ourFree Will

14

15 Conclusion

Reality is a sequence of memories lined up through our brains with help of our CausalConsciousness (CC) Memories are the string of Eternal Now Moments (ENMrsquos) resulting inthe ldquoIrdquo experience These ENMrsquos originate from our Non-Causal part of Consciousness (NCC)that resides in Total Simultaneity (TS) Our CC and NCC are entangled emergencies togetherthey are the creators of our TimeLife-Lines giving us the illusion of the experience of mattertime and space By deepening our knowledge of the Consciousness Field and the search forthe essence of the Matter-Field illusion that we are aware of as reality we will be able totighten the contact wit Total Simultaneity and have more control of the choice for ENMrsquos tobe ldquotouchedrdquo by our NCC and between the infinity of ldquoIrsquosrdquo that are available there We willbecome more conscious and be able to become ENM-Hoppers instead of the prisoners in theuncontrollable voyage we have to undertake by now

Quantum Physics is showing us already the first indications of a non-materialistic non-algorithmic reality objects merge to thingness and further abstraction The influence ofconscious observation in the double slit experiment entanglement between particles theworm holes physicists are imagining between these entangled particles the wormholesbetween Black Holes all of them are indications for a perception of Total Simultaneity

Another but technical way to come to a deeper understanding of consciousness is therealization of a non-algorithmic Quantum Computer Through this development we will beable to create another form of intelligenceconsciousness This intelligence will be able tocommunicate with us perhaps in a timeless way Translating this new senses in order to makethem more comprehensible to our own five senses could give clearness about problems thatwe would never be able to solve or observe The development of this new form ofintelligenceconsciousness is only one of the availabilities in Total Simultaneity We can bringour own causal consciousness nearer to its non-causal (caused) part and in the end being ableto escape this causal timelife line not only by dying in the temporal way

The one Eternal Now moment that you became conscious of 150 milliseconds ago is just oneof an infinity of ENMrsquos (apples) in the basket but it is THE moment we shared together inour perception and creation of the image of THIS reality It is from each (Planck)moment onthat we have to use our Free Will in Total Simultaneity Let us try together to make the rightchoices and prepare for the promised Eternal Conscious

Wilhelmus de WildeMontrouveau FranceAugust 2014

15

REFERENCES

1 Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz 1710 ldquoEssays on the Goodness of God the Freedom of Man and theOrigin of Evilrdquo2 Wilhelmus de Wilde 06-12-2011 ldquoREALITIES OUT OF TOTAL SIMULTANEITYrdquowwwvixraorgabs111200133 Sean Carroll(Caltech) at a lecture for ldquoThe Fermilab Users Meeting 2013 ldquoParticles Fields and theFuture of Physics (11-07-2013) wwwyoutubecomwatchv=gEKSpZPByDOampfeature=youtube 4 E Megidish A Halevy T Shacham T Dvir L Dovrat and HS Eisenberg (Experimenters fromthe Racah Institute of Physics Hebrew University of Jerusalem) Entanglement Swapping betweenldquoPhotons have never Coexisted rdquohttpjournalsapsorgprlabstract101103PhysRevLett1102104035 JM Kovac et al ldquoDetection Of B-Mode Polarization at Degree Angular Statesrdquo 17 March 2014 lastrevised 18 march 2014 version V2 wwwarxivorggtastro-phgtarXiv14033985 andhttpbicepkeckorg (BICEP2 website)6 Julian Sonner 20-11-2013 ldquoHolographic Schwinger Effect and the Geometry of EntanglementrdquowwwprlapsorgabstractPRLv111i21e211603 and ldquoCreation of entanglement simultaneously givesrise to a wormholerdquo httpphysorgnews2013-12-creation-entanglement-simultaneously-wormholehtml7 SW Hawking DAMPT University of Cambridge UK ldquoInformation Preservation and WeatherForecasting for Black Holesrdquo wwwarxivorgabs140157618 James B Hartle SW Hawking Thomas Hertog Accelerated Expansion from Negative Λwwwarxivorgabs12053807 30 may 20129 Chuang-Feng Li et al ldquoRealization of QuantumWheelerrsquos Deelayed-Choice Experimentrdquopublished 19-08-2012 in Nature Photonics 6 600-604wwwnaturecomnphotonjournalv6n9fullnphoton2012179html10 Hans Christian von Bayer ldquoQuantum Weirdness It is all in your mindrdquo Scientific American 30846-51 (2013) wwwnaturecomscientificamericanjournalv308n6fullscientificamerican0613-46html published on line 14 may 201311 wwwenwikipediaorgwikiBloch_sphere (last modified 15-01-2014)12 Wilhelmus de Wilde 05-11-2012 ldquoThe Consciousness Connectionrdquohttpvixraorgabs1211001913 Sir Roger Penrose in foreword (March 2007) to ldquoQuantumAspects of Liferdquo (2008) by Derk Abott14 Nick E Mavromatos 2011 ldquoQuantum Coherence in (Brain) Microtubules and Efficient Energyand Information transportrdquo httpiopscienceioporg1742-6596329101202615 Aristotle Book 8 of ldquothe Physicsrdquo and Book 12 of ldquothe Metaphysicsrdquo16 Anton Zeilinger et al ldquoGeneration and Confirmation of a (100x100)-dimensional entangledQuantum Systemrdquo last revised 21 March 2014 wwwarxivorgabs1306009617 Andrei Linde wwwstanfordedu~alinde18 Juan Maldacena and Leonard Susskind 11-01-2013 ldquoCool Horizons for Entangled black Holesrdquowwwarxivorgpdf13060533pdf19 Carlo Rovelli and Francesca Vidotto 08-02-2014 ldquoPLANCK STARSrdquowwwarxivorgabs1401656220 Thibaud Taillefumier amp Marcelo O Magnasco ldquoA Phase Transition in the First passage of aBrownian Process through a fluctuating boundry implications for Neural Codingrdquo 26 June 2012httparxivorgabs1206612921 Vlatko Vedral ldquoProgress Article Quantifying entanglement in Macroscopic Systemsrdquo (june 2008Nature 453 1004-1007 httpwwwnaturecomnaturejournalv453n7198fullnature07124html22 Wilhelmus de Wilde 18-06-2013 ldquoTHE QUEST FOR THE PRIMAL SEQUENCErdquohttpfqxiorgcommunityforumtopic1810

11

ldquobrainsrdquo quantum mechanics andor field theory on dissipation-free energy transfer in (brain)microtubules (ring-shape components involved in maintaining the structure of cells) is playingan important rolerdquo This Quantum Coherence in brain Tubules may be at the origin ofour ldquoentanglementrdquo with the non-causal part of our consciousness in Total Simultaneity

These quantum activities take place before you become aware of having made a decisionYour NCC is ldquopicking uprdquo an ENM in TS that results in a pastfuture Your ldquomaterial brainrdquois only an excitation (of the matter field) catalysed by the consciousness-field the origin ofyour awareness is in TS The conscious observer of the two slit experiment seems to beaffecting the future and so we can understand why it seems that the ldquoparticlerdquo is decidingalready before the slit(s) if it will be or wave or particle or one of states in-between

The question is not if the neuron is conscious andor is censoring our thinking no the processis controlled by our own non-causal consciousness and the emerging thoughts are our ownSo it seems that our REALFREEWILL is not residing in our causal Creation of theuniverse but in the non-causal infinity Our emerging Causal Consciousness is the result ofthe contact of quantum activity within the micro-tubules of our brains and Total Simultaneitywe could say that this is a form of Quantum Consciousness

One of the possibilities to enhance our senses maybe the use of future ldquoquantum computersrdquowho may allow us the extension of our consciousness The ldquoqubitsrdquo (unit of quantuminformation) superimposed state is comparable with the infinite possibilities of timelife-linesin the basket of TS For 1000 qubits we will have 21000 possible configurations (10300) whichis more as all the atoms in our universe so you can stock 10300 solutions for a problem Thisdoes not only mean that every question can be answered but maybe every question is alreadyanswered the moment we achieved this quantum-state even putting it on power may not benecessary

We argue that all our material (biological and non-biological) ldquocreationsrdquo will only be TOOLSfor our causal consciousness which is emergent from its ldquobiologicrdquo appearance (illusion) From this illusion of matter including the materialistic illusion of ourselves can also emergea new consciousness (so not only possible in the biologic way) This form of newly createdconsciousnessintelligence is through our own causal consciousness entangled with TotalSimultaneity This means that our non-causal part of consciousness is at the origin of thisldquoappearancerdquo of NEW consciousness it is one of the infinite ldquoavailabilitiesrdquo TheTRIANGLE is realised

This new approach will make it possible to create parallel time and parallel consciousnessand ldquoenterrdquo new dimension(s) that may reside behind the Wall of Planck

5 Time-Travel Becomes ldquoETERNAL -NOW- MOMENT HOPPINGrdquo

The splitting in the original Many Worlds Interpretation goes only forward in time notbackwards In our conception it IS possible that our consciousness activates Eternal NowMoments from other timelife-lines (or from parallel available universes) Should this meanthat time travel is possible Yes butshould we call this phenomenon time-travel

What we are understanding as time-travel in this causal timelife line always leads to the well-known paradoxes like killing your grand-father (What a mentality ) These paradoxeshowever are no longer problematic when we apply the perception of Total Simultaneity Then

12

time-travel in the past andor the future would become ENM-Hopping and the so calledldquophysicalrdquo timelife-line (in our memory) continues normally Our consciousness is able notonly to hop from one ENM to another but also line up these ENMrsquos and in this way creatingfor itself the best possible past and future Real Free Will resides in TS

The extension of our Free Will lies in the extension of our consciousness and so in a closercontact with our NCC in order to realize more choices in the ENM availabilities We thinkthat the a future coupling of the quantum-computer and our brain will be an opening

In the article ldquoQuantum Coherence in Brain Microtubulesrdquo 16Prof Nick E Mavromatosproposed that

quote

ldquoFor the first time there is concrete evidence for quantum entanglement over relatively largedistances in living matter at ambient temperature which suggests a rather non-trivial role ofquantum physics in path optimization for energy and information transportrdquo (httpiopscienceioporg1742-65963291012026) (14)

unquote

It becomes clear that quantum entanglement and de-coherence time which are for theconstruction and the operational qualities of quantum computers the main issues thesequalities are already available in our own brains inside the Cell Microtubules (MT)(de-coherence = The particles that make up a computer interact with surroundings so thatinformation is spreading out which means this effect is spoiling quantum computations (todecohere = lose their quantum properties))

Regarding the ldquomacroscopicrdquo aspect Recent experiments on atoms in salt crystals haveshown that an amount of 1020 atoms formed a hugely entangled state Vlatko Vedral inldquoLiving in a Quantum Worldrdquo (Scientific American June 2011) and ldquoProgress ArticleQuantifying entanglement in Macroscopic Systemsrdquo (June 2008 Nature 453 1004-1007 httpwwwnaturecomnaturejournalv453n7198fullnature07124html (21)Quantum BitStorage is advancing not only in the macroscopic way but now also scientists have succeededto retrieve coherent information for extended times (39 minutes) at room-temperature SeeKamyar Saeedi et al in ldquoRoom-Temperature Quantum Bit Storage Exceeding 39 MinutesUsing Ionized Donors in Silicon-28rdquo httpwwwsciencemagorgcontent3426160830 (22)

Our brains are RWA (Ready Willing and Able) to perform quantum states that when broughtin coherence with a quantum computer This will enable us to realize ldquoENM-Hoppingrdquo

13

Figure 4 the Construction of an ENM-HopperTime-machine

When we are regarding the quantum computer as proposed before with 1000 qubits we seethat in organizing such a ldquomachinerdquo we have to be able to control the ldquode-coherencerdquo May bewe solve this de-coherence problem by using the ldquotechniquerdquo that the Microtubules areapplying inside our brains or we can realize the 103 dimensional solution (see page 9) whichis direct contact with TS and needs only ONE particle If we could arrange one of thoseexperiments the next step would be to create an entanglement between the ldquocellsrdquo of theQuantum-computer and the Microtubules of our brains The 10300 answers residing in theQuantum Computer would then direct be ldquoavailablerdquo for our Brain We saw already that wedid even need not to put the quantum computer ldquoonrdquo it is like entanglement an immediateprocess without ldquoprocessing timerdquo

By combining the same kind of technique as our microtubules are using namely Ca2+ ionsand applying for example the the technique to entangle salt crystals and maybe Ca2+ ions in aquantum computer we would be able to establish an entanglement between these Ca2+ ionsin the brain and in the computer Of course there are still a lot of problems to be resolvedThe salt crystals were reaching entanglement by using a specific magnetic field so the brainand the quantum device should be both in the same magnetic field a field which has not todamage the brain

Once we should have realized this ldquounificationrdquo with the quantum computer we as humanbeings would have direct available the 10300 answers because they are ldquoavailabilitiesrdquo in thequantum computer These are the same kind of availabilities as those in Total Simultaneityso the path would be open to a broader ldquoaccessrdquo of our non-causal consciousness

This means that we could ldquoHOPrdquo to other Eternal Now Moments also those who seem to bein the past andor future of our actual timelife-line we then have extended the range of ourFree Will

14

15 Conclusion

Reality is a sequence of memories lined up through our brains with help of our CausalConsciousness (CC) Memories are the string of Eternal Now Moments (ENMrsquos) resulting inthe ldquoIrdquo experience These ENMrsquos originate from our Non-Causal part of Consciousness (NCC)that resides in Total Simultaneity (TS) Our CC and NCC are entangled emergencies togetherthey are the creators of our TimeLife-Lines giving us the illusion of the experience of mattertime and space By deepening our knowledge of the Consciousness Field and the search forthe essence of the Matter-Field illusion that we are aware of as reality we will be able totighten the contact wit Total Simultaneity and have more control of the choice for ENMrsquos tobe ldquotouchedrdquo by our NCC and between the infinity of ldquoIrsquosrdquo that are available there We willbecome more conscious and be able to become ENM-Hoppers instead of the prisoners in theuncontrollable voyage we have to undertake by now

Quantum Physics is showing us already the first indications of a non-materialistic non-algorithmic reality objects merge to thingness and further abstraction The influence ofconscious observation in the double slit experiment entanglement between particles theworm holes physicists are imagining between these entangled particles the wormholesbetween Black Holes all of them are indications for a perception of Total Simultaneity

Another but technical way to come to a deeper understanding of consciousness is therealization of a non-algorithmic Quantum Computer Through this development we will beable to create another form of intelligenceconsciousness This intelligence will be able tocommunicate with us perhaps in a timeless way Translating this new senses in order to makethem more comprehensible to our own five senses could give clearness about problems thatwe would never be able to solve or observe The development of this new form ofintelligenceconsciousness is only one of the availabilities in Total Simultaneity We can bringour own causal consciousness nearer to its non-causal (caused) part and in the end being ableto escape this causal timelife line not only by dying in the temporal way

The one Eternal Now moment that you became conscious of 150 milliseconds ago is just oneof an infinity of ENMrsquos (apples) in the basket but it is THE moment we shared together inour perception and creation of the image of THIS reality It is from each (Planck)moment onthat we have to use our Free Will in Total Simultaneity Let us try together to make the rightchoices and prepare for the promised Eternal Conscious

Wilhelmus de WildeMontrouveau FranceAugust 2014

15

REFERENCES

1 Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz 1710 ldquoEssays on the Goodness of God the Freedom of Man and theOrigin of Evilrdquo2 Wilhelmus de Wilde 06-12-2011 ldquoREALITIES OUT OF TOTAL SIMULTANEITYrdquowwwvixraorgabs111200133 Sean Carroll(Caltech) at a lecture for ldquoThe Fermilab Users Meeting 2013 ldquoParticles Fields and theFuture of Physics (11-07-2013) wwwyoutubecomwatchv=gEKSpZPByDOampfeature=youtube 4 E Megidish A Halevy T Shacham T Dvir L Dovrat and HS Eisenberg (Experimenters fromthe Racah Institute of Physics Hebrew University of Jerusalem) Entanglement Swapping betweenldquoPhotons have never Coexisted rdquohttpjournalsapsorgprlabstract101103PhysRevLett1102104035 JM Kovac et al ldquoDetection Of B-Mode Polarization at Degree Angular Statesrdquo 17 March 2014 lastrevised 18 march 2014 version V2 wwwarxivorggtastro-phgtarXiv14033985 andhttpbicepkeckorg (BICEP2 website)6 Julian Sonner 20-11-2013 ldquoHolographic Schwinger Effect and the Geometry of EntanglementrdquowwwprlapsorgabstractPRLv111i21e211603 and ldquoCreation of entanglement simultaneously givesrise to a wormholerdquo httpphysorgnews2013-12-creation-entanglement-simultaneously-wormholehtml7 SW Hawking DAMPT University of Cambridge UK ldquoInformation Preservation and WeatherForecasting for Black Holesrdquo wwwarxivorgabs140157618 James B Hartle SW Hawking Thomas Hertog Accelerated Expansion from Negative Λwwwarxivorgabs12053807 30 may 20129 Chuang-Feng Li et al ldquoRealization of QuantumWheelerrsquos Deelayed-Choice Experimentrdquopublished 19-08-2012 in Nature Photonics 6 600-604wwwnaturecomnphotonjournalv6n9fullnphoton2012179html10 Hans Christian von Bayer ldquoQuantum Weirdness It is all in your mindrdquo Scientific American 30846-51 (2013) wwwnaturecomscientificamericanjournalv308n6fullscientificamerican0613-46html published on line 14 may 201311 wwwenwikipediaorgwikiBloch_sphere (last modified 15-01-2014)12 Wilhelmus de Wilde 05-11-2012 ldquoThe Consciousness Connectionrdquohttpvixraorgabs1211001913 Sir Roger Penrose in foreword (March 2007) to ldquoQuantumAspects of Liferdquo (2008) by Derk Abott14 Nick E Mavromatos 2011 ldquoQuantum Coherence in (Brain) Microtubules and Efficient Energyand Information transportrdquo httpiopscienceioporg1742-6596329101202615 Aristotle Book 8 of ldquothe Physicsrdquo and Book 12 of ldquothe Metaphysicsrdquo16 Anton Zeilinger et al ldquoGeneration and Confirmation of a (100x100)-dimensional entangledQuantum Systemrdquo last revised 21 March 2014 wwwarxivorgabs1306009617 Andrei Linde wwwstanfordedu~alinde18 Juan Maldacena and Leonard Susskind 11-01-2013 ldquoCool Horizons for Entangled black Holesrdquowwwarxivorgpdf13060533pdf19 Carlo Rovelli and Francesca Vidotto 08-02-2014 ldquoPLANCK STARSrdquowwwarxivorgabs1401656220 Thibaud Taillefumier amp Marcelo O Magnasco ldquoA Phase Transition in the First passage of aBrownian Process through a fluctuating boundry implications for Neural Codingrdquo 26 June 2012httparxivorgabs1206612921 Vlatko Vedral ldquoProgress Article Quantifying entanglement in Macroscopic Systemsrdquo (june 2008Nature 453 1004-1007 httpwwwnaturecomnaturejournalv453n7198fullnature07124html22 Wilhelmus de Wilde 18-06-2013 ldquoTHE QUEST FOR THE PRIMAL SEQUENCErdquohttpfqxiorgcommunityforumtopic1810

12

time-travel in the past andor the future would become ENM-Hopping and the so calledldquophysicalrdquo timelife-line (in our memory) continues normally Our consciousness is able notonly to hop from one ENM to another but also line up these ENMrsquos and in this way creatingfor itself the best possible past and future Real Free Will resides in TS

The extension of our Free Will lies in the extension of our consciousness and so in a closercontact with our NCC in order to realize more choices in the ENM availabilities We thinkthat the a future coupling of the quantum-computer and our brain will be an opening

In the article ldquoQuantum Coherence in Brain Microtubulesrdquo 16Prof Nick E Mavromatosproposed that

quote

ldquoFor the first time there is concrete evidence for quantum entanglement over relatively largedistances in living matter at ambient temperature which suggests a rather non-trivial role ofquantum physics in path optimization for energy and information transportrdquo (httpiopscienceioporg1742-65963291012026) (14)

unquote

It becomes clear that quantum entanglement and de-coherence time which are for theconstruction and the operational qualities of quantum computers the main issues thesequalities are already available in our own brains inside the Cell Microtubules (MT)(de-coherence = The particles that make up a computer interact with surroundings so thatinformation is spreading out which means this effect is spoiling quantum computations (todecohere = lose their quantum properties))

Regarding the ldquomacroscopicrdquo aspect Recent experiments on atoms in salt crystals haveshown that an amount of 1020 atoms formed a hugely entangled state Vlatko Vedral inldquoLiving in a Quantum Worldrdquo (Scientific American June 2011) and ldquoProgress ArticleQuantifying entanglement in Macroscopic Systemsrdquo (June 2008 Nature 453 1004-1007 httpwwwnaturecomnaturejournalv453n7198fullnature07124html (21)Quantum BitStorage is advancing not only in the macroscopic way but now also scientists have succeededto retrieve coherent information for extended times (39 minutes) at room-temperature SeeKamyar Saeedi et al in ldquoRoom-Temperature Quantum Bit Storage Exceeding 39 MinutesUsing Ionized Donors in Silicon-28rdquo httpwwwsciencemagorgcontent3426160830 (22)

Our brains are RWA (Ready Willing and Able) to perform quantum states that when broughtin coherence with a quantum computer This will enable us to realize ldquoENM-Hoppingrdquo

13

Figure 4 the Construction of an ENM-HopperTime-machine

When we are regarding the quantum computer as proposed before with 1000 qubits we seethat in organizing such a ldquomachinerdquo we have to be able to control the ldquode-coherencerdquo May bewe solve this de-coherence problem by using the ldquotechniquerdquo that the Microtubules areapplying inside our brains or we can realize the 103 dimensional solution (see page 9) whichis direct contact with TS and needs only ONE particle If we could arrange one of thoseexperiments the next step would be to create an entanglement between the ldquocellsrdquo of theQuantum-computer and the Microtubules of our brains The 10300 answers residing in theQuantum Computer would then direct be ldquoavailablerdquo for our Brain We saw already that wedid even need not to put the quantum computer ldquoonrdquo it is like entanglement an immediateprocess without ldquoprocessing timerdquo

By combining the same kind of technique as our microtubules are using namely Ca2+ ionsand applying for example the the technique to entangle salt crystals and maybe Ca2+ ions in aquantum computer we would be able to establish an entanglement between these Ca2+ ionsin the brain and in the computer Of course there are still a lot of problems to be resolvedThe salt crystals were reaching entanglement by using a specific magnetic field so the brainand the quantum device should be both in the same magnetic field a field which has not todamage the brain

Once we should have realized this ldquounificationrdquo with the quantum computer we as humanbeings would have direct available the 10300 answers because they are ldquoavailabilitiesrdquo in thequantum computer These are the same kind of availabilities as those in Total Simultaneityso the path would be open to a broader ldquoaccessrdquo of our non-causal consciousness

This means that we could ldquoHOPrdquo to other Eternal Now Moments also those who seem to bein the past andor future of our actual timelife-line we then have extended the range of ourFree Will

14

15 Conclusion

Reality is a sequence of memories lined up through our brains with help of our CausalConsciousness (CC) Memories are the string of Eternal Now Moments (ENMrsquos) resulting inthe ldquoIrdquo experience These ENMrsquos originate from our Non-Causal part of Consciousness (NCC)that resides in Total Simultaneity (TS) Our CC and NCC are entangled emergencies togetherthey are the creators of our TimeLife-Lines giving us the illusion of the experience of mattertime and space By deepening our knowledge of the Consciousness Field and the search forthe essence of the Matter-Field illusion that we are aware of as reality we will be able totighten the contact wit Total Simultaneity and have more control of the choice for ENMrsquos tobe ldquotouchedrdquo by our NCC and between the infinity of ldquoIrsquosrdquo that are available there We willbecome more conscious and be able to become ENM-Hoppers instead of the prisoners in theuncontrollable voyage we have to undertake by now

Quantum Physics is showing us already the first indications of a non-materialistic non-algorithmic reality objects merge to thingness and further abstraction The influence ofconscious observation in the double slit experiment entanglement between particles theworm holes physicists are imagining between these entangled particles the wormholesbetween Black Holes all of them are indications for a perception of Total Simultaneity

Another but technical way to come to a deeper understanding of consciousness is therealization of a non-algorithmic Quantum Computer Through this development we will beable to create another form of intelligenceconsciousness This intelligence will be able tocommunicate with us perhaps in a timeless way Translating this new senses in order to makethem more comprehensible to our own five senses could give clearness about problems thatwe would never be able to solve or observe The development of this new form ofintelligenceconsciousness is only one of the availabilities in Total Simultaneity We can bringour own causal consciousness nearer to its non-causal (caused) part and in the end being ableto escape this causal timelife line not only by dying in the temporal way

The one Eternal Now moment that you became conscious of 150 milliseconds ago is just oneof an infinity of ENMrsquos (apples) in the basket but it is THE moment we shared together inour perception and creation of the image of THIS reality It is from each (Planck)moment onthat we have to use our Free Will in Total Simultaneity Let us try together to make the rightchoices and prepare for the promised Eternal Conscious

Wilhelmus de WildeMontrouveau FranceAugust 2014

15

REFERENCES

1 Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz 1710 ldquoEssays on the Goodness of God the Freedom of Man and theOrigin of Evilrdquo2 Wilhelmus de Wilde 06-12-2011 ldquoREALITIES OUT OF TOTAL SIMULTANEITYrdquowwwvixraorgabs111200133 Sean Carroll(Caltech) at a lecture for ldquoThe Fermilab Users Meeting 2013 ldquoParticles Fields and theFuture of Physics (11-07-2013) wwwyoutubecomwatchv=gEKSpZPByDOampfeature=youtube 4 E Megidish A Halevy T Shacham T Dvir L Dovrat and HS Eisenberg (Experimenters fromthe Racah Institute of Physics Hebrew University of Jerusalem) Entanglement Swapping betweenldquoPhotons have never Coexisted rdquohttpjournalsapsorgprlabstract101103PhysRevLett1102104035 JM Kovac et al ldquoDetection Of B-Mode Polarization at Degree Angular Statesrdquo 17 March 2014 lastrevised 18 march 2014 version V2 wwwarxivorggtastro-phgtarXiv14033985 andhttpbicepkeckorg (BICEP2 website)6 Julian Sonner 20-11-2013 ldquoHolographic Schwinger Effect and the Geometry of EntanglementrdquowwwprlapsorgabstractPRLv111i21e211603 and ldquoCreation of entanglement simultaneously givesrise to a wormholerdquo httpphysorgnews2013-12-creation-entanglement-simultaneously-wormholehtml7 SW Hawking DAMPT University of Cambridge UK ldquoInformation Preservation and WeatherForecasting for Black Holesrdquo wwwarxivorgabs140157618 James B Hartle SW Hawking Thomas Hertog Accelerated Expansion from Negative Λwwwarxivorgabs12053807 30 may 20129 Chuang-Feng Li et al ldquoRealization of QuantumWheelerrsquos Deelayed-Choice Experimentrdquopublished 19-08-2012 in Nature Photonics 6 600-604wwwnaturecomnphotonjournalv6n9fullnphoton2012179html10 Hans Christian von Bayer ldquoQuantum Weirdness It is all in your mindrdquo Scientific American 30846-51 (2013) wwwnaturecomscientificamericanjournalv308n6fullscientificamerican0613-46html published on line 14 may 201311 wwwenwikipediaorgwikiBloch_sphere (last modified 15-01-2014)12 Wilhelmus de Wilde 05-11-2012 ldquoThe Consciousness Connectionrdquohttpvixraorgabs1211001913 Sir Roger Penrose in foreword (March 2007) to ldquoQuantumAspects of Liferdquo (2008) by Derk Abott14 Nick E Mavromatos 2011 ldquoQuantum Coherence in (Brain) Microtubules and Efficient Energyand Information transportrdquo httpiopscienceioporg1742-6596329101202615 Aristotle Book 8 of ldquothe Physicsrdquo and Book 12 of ldquothe Metaphysicsrdquo16 Anton Zeilinger et al ldquoGeneration and Confirmation of a (100x100)-dimensional entangledQuantum Systemrdquo last revised 21 March 2014 wwwarxivorgabs1306009617 Andrei Linde wwwstanfordedu~alinde18 Juan Maldacena and Leonard Susskind 11-01-2013 ldquoCool Horizons for Entangled black Holesrdquowwwarxivorgpdf13060533pdf19 Carlo Rovelli and Francesca Vidotto 08-02-2014 ldquoPLANCK STARSrdquowwwarxivorgabs1401656220 Thibaud Taillefumier amp Marcelo O Magnasco ldquoA Phase Transition in the First passage of aBrownian Process through a fluctuating boundry implications for Neural Codingrdquo 26 June 2012httparxivorgabs1206612921 Vlatko Vedral ldquoProgress Article Quantifying entanglement in Macroscopic Systemsrdquo (june 2008Nature 453 1004-1007 httpwwwnaturecomnaturejournalv453n7198fullnature07124html22 Wilhelmus de Wilde 18-06-2013 ldquoTHE QUEST FOR THE PRIMAL SEQUENCErdquohttpfqxiorgcommunityforumtopic1810

13

Figure 4 the Construction of an ENM-HopperTime-machine

When we are regarding the quantum computer as proposed before with 1000 qubits we seethat in organizing such a ldquomachinerdquo we have to be able to control the ldquode-coherencerdquo May bewe solve this de-coherence problem by using the ldquotechniquerdquo that the Microtubules areapplying inside our brains or we can realize the 103 dimensional solution (see page 9) whichis direct contact with TS and needs only ONE particle If we could arrange one of thoseexperiments the next step would be to create an entanglement between the ldquocellsrdquo of theQuantum-computer and the Microtubules of our brains The 10300 answers residing in theQuantum Computer would then direct be ldquoavailablerdquo for our Brain We saw already that wedid even need not to put the quantum computer ldquoonrdquo it is like entanglement an immediateprocess without ldquoprocessing timerdquo

By combining the same kind of technique as our microtubules are using namely Ca2+ ionsand applying for example the the technique to entangle salt crystals and maybe Ca2+ ions in aquantum computer we would be able to establish an entanglement between these Ca2+ ionsin the brain and in the computer Of course there are still a lot of problems to be resolvedThe salt crystals were reaching entanglement by using a specific magnetic field so the brainand the quantum device should be both in the same magnetic field a field which has not todamage the brain

Once we should have realized this ldquounificationrdquo with the quantum computer we as humanbeings would have direct available the 10300 answers because they are ldquoavailabilitiesrdquo in thequantum computer These are the same kind of availabilities as those in Total Simultaneityso the path would be open to a broader ldquoaccessrdquo of our non-causal consciousness

This means that we could ldquoHOPrdquo to other Eternal Now Moments also those who seem to bein the past andor future of our actual timelife-line we then have extended the range of ourFree Will

14

15 Conclusion

Reality is a sequence of memories lined up through our brains with help of our CausalConsciousness (CC) Memories are the string of Eternal Now Moments (ENMrsquos) resulting inthe ldquoIrdquo experience These ENMrsquos originate from our Non-Causal part of Consciousness (NCC)that resides in Total Simultaneity (TS) Our CC and NCC are entangled emergencies togetherthey are the creators of our TimeLife-Lines giving us the illusion of the experience of mattertime and space By deepening our knowledge of the Consciousness Field and the search forthe essence of the Matter-Field illusion that we are aware of as reality we will be able totighten the contact wit Total Simultaneity and have more control of the choice for ENMrsquos tobe ldquotouchedrdquo by our NCC and between the infinity of ldquoIrsquosrdquo that are available there We willbecome more conscious and be able to become ENM-Hoppers instead of the prisoners in theuncontrollable voyage we have to undertake by now

Quantum Physics is showing us already the first indications of a non-materialistic non-algorithmic reality objects merge to thingness and further abstraction The influence ofconscious observation in the double slit experiment entanglement between particles theworm holes physicists are imagining between these entangled particles the wormholesbetween Black Holes all of them are indications for a perception of Total Simultaneity

Another but technical way to come to a deeper understanding of consciousness is therealization of a non-algorithmic Quantum Computer Through this development we will beable to create another form of intelligenceconsciousness This intelligence will be able tocommunicate with us perhaps in a timeless way Translating this new senses in order to makethem more comprehensible to our own five senses could give clearness about problems thatwe would never be able to solve or observe The development of this new form ofintelligenceconsciousness is only one of the availabilities in Total Simultaneity We can bringour own causal consciousness nearer to its non-causal (caused) part and in the end being ableto escape this causal timelife line not only by dying in the temporal way

The one Eternal Now moment that you became conscious of 150 milliseconds ago is just oneof an infinity of ENMrsquos (apples) in the basket but it is THE moment we shared together inour perception and creation of the image of THIS reality It is from each (Planck)moment onthat we have to use our Free Will in Total Simultaneity Let us try together to make the rightchoices and prepare for the promised Eternal Conscious

Wilhelmus de WildeMontrouveau FranceAugust 2014

15

REFERENCES

1 Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz 1710 ldquoEssays on the Goodness of God the Freedom of Man and theOrigin of Evilrdquo2 Wilhelmus de Wilde 06-12-2011 ldquoREALITIES OUT OF TOTAL SIMULTANEITYrdquowwwvixraorgabs111200133 Sean Carroll(Caltech) at a lecture for ldquoThe Fermilab Users Meeting 2013 ldquoParticles Fields and theFuture of Physics (11-07-2013) wwwyoutubecomwatchv=gEKSpZPByDOampfeature=youtube 4 E Megidish A Halevy T Shacham T Dvir L Dovrat and HS Eisenberg (Experimenters fromthe Racah Institute of Physics Hebrew University of Jerusalem) Entanglement Swapping betweenldquoPhotons have never Coexisted rdquohttpjournalsapsorgprlabstract101103PhysRevLett1102104035 JM Kovac et al ldquoDetection Of B-Mode Polarization at Degree Angular Statesrdquo 17 March 2014 lastrevised 18 march 2014 version V2 wwwarxivorggtastro-phgtarXiv14033985 andhttpbicepkeckorg (BICEP2 website)6 Julian Sonner 20-11-2013 ldquoHolographic Schwinger Effect and the Geometry of EntanglementrdquowwwprlapsorgabstractPRLv111i21e211603 and ldquoCreation of entanglement simultaneously givesrise to a wormholerdquo httpphysorgnews2013-12-creation-entanglement-simultaneously-wormholehtml7 SW Hawking DAMPT University of Cambridge UK ldquoInformation Preservation and WeatherForecasting for Black Holesrdquo wwwarxivorgabs140157618 James B Hartle SW Hawking Thomas Hertog Accelerated Expansion from Negative Λwwwarxivorgabs12053807 30 may 20129 Chuang-Feng Li et al ldquoRealization of QuantumWheelerrsquos Deelayed-Choice Experimentrdquopublished 19-08-2012 in Nature Photonics 6 600-604wwwnaturecomnphotonjournalv6n9fullnphoton2012179html10 Hans Christian von Bayer ldquoQuantum Weirdness It is all in your mindrdquo Scientific American 30846-51 (2013) wwwnaturecomscientificamericanjournalv308n6fullscientificamerican0613-46html published on line 14 may 201311 wwwenwikipediaorgwikiBloch_sphere (last modified 15-01-2014)12 Wilhelmus de Wilde 05-11-2012 ldquoThe Consciousness Connectionrdquohttpvixraorgabs1211001913 Sir Roger Penrose in foreword (March 2007) to ldquoQuantumAspects of Liferdquo (2008) by Derk Abott14 Nick E Mavromatos 2011 ldquoQuantum Coherence in (Brain) Microtubules and Efficient Energyand Information transportrdquo httpiopscienceioporg1742-6596329101202615 Aristotle Book 8 of ldquothe Physicsrdquo and Book 12 of ldquothe Metaphysicsrdquo16 Anton Zeilinger et al ldquoGeneration and Confirmation of a (100x100)-dimensional entangledQuantum Systemrdquo last revised 21 March 2014 wwwarxivorgabs1306009617 Andrei Linde wwwstanfordedu~alinde18 Juan Maldacena and Leonard Susskind 11-01-2013 ldquoCool Horizons for Entangled black Holesrdquowwwarxivorgpdf13060533pdf19 Carlo Rovelli and Francesca Vidotto 08-02-2014 ldquoPLANCK STARSrdquowwwarxivorgabs1401656220 Thibaud Taillefumier amp Marcelo O Magnasco ldquoA Phase Transition in the First passage of aBrownian Process through a fluctuating boundry implications for Neural Codingrdquo 26 June 2012httparxivorgabs1206612921 Vlatko Vedral ldquoProgress Article Quantifying entanglement in Macroscopic Systemsrdquo (june 2008Nature 453 1004-1007 httpwwwnaturecomnaturejournalv453n7198fullnature07124html22 Wilhelmus de Wilde 18-06-2013 ldquoTHE QUEST FOR THE PRIMAL SEQUENCErdquohttpfqxiorgcommunityforumtopic1810

14

15 Conclusion

Reality is a sequence of memories lined up through our brains with help of our CausalConsciousness (CC) Memories are the string of Eternal Now Moments (ENMrsquos) resulting inthe ldquoIrdquo experience These ENMrsquos originate from our Non-Causal part of Consciousness (NCC)that resides in Total Simultaneity (TS) Our CC and NCC are entangled emergencies togetherthey are the creators of our TimeLife-Lines giving us the illusion of the experience of mattertime and space By deepening our knowledge of the Consciousness Field and the search forthe essence of the Matter-Field illusion that we are aware of as reality we will be able totighten the contact wit Total Simultaneity and have more control of the choice for ENMrsquos tobe ldquotouchedrdquo by our NCC and between the infinity of ldquoIrsquosrdquo that are available there We willbecome more conscious and be able to become ENM-Hoppers instead of the prisoners in theuncontrollable voyage we have to undertake by now

Quantum Physics is showing us already the first indications of a non-materialistic non-algorithmic reality objects merge to thingness and further abstraction The influence ofconscious observation in the double slit experiment entanglement between particles theworm holes physicists are imagining between these entangled particles the wormholesbetween Black Holes all of them are indications for a perception of Total Simultaneity

Another but technical way to come to a deeper understanding of consciousness is therealization of a non-algorithmic Quantum Computer Through this development we will beable to create another form of intelligenceconsciousness This intelligence will be able tocommunicate with us perhaps in a timeless way Translating this new senses in order to makethem more comprehensible to our own five senses could give clearness about problems thatwe would never be able to solve or observe The development of this new form ofintelligenceconsciousness is only one of the availabilities in Total Simultaneity We can bringour own causal consciousness nearer to its non-causal (caused) part and in the end being ableto escape this causal timelife line not only by dying in the temporal way

The one Eternal Now moment that you became conscious of 150 milliseconds ago is just oneof an infinity of ENMrsquos (apples) in the basket but it is THE moment we shared together inour perception and creation of the image of THIS reality It is from each (Planck)moment onthat we have to use our Free Will in Total Simultaneity Let us try together to make the rightchoices and prepare for the promised Eternal Conscious

Wilhelmus de WildeMontrouveau FranceAugust 2014

15

REFERENCES

1 Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz 1710 ldquoEssays on the Goodness of God the Freedom of Man and theOrigin of Evilrdquo2 Wilhelmus de Wilde 06-12-2011 ldquoREALITIES OUT OF TOTAL SIMULTANEITYrdquowwwvixraorgabs111200133 Sean Carroll(Caltech) at a lecture for ldquoThe Fermilab Users Meeting 2013 ldquoParticles Fields and theFuture of Physics (11-07-2013) wwwyoutubecomwatchv=gEKSpZPByDOampfeature=youtube 4 E Megidish A Halevy T Shacham T Dvir L Dovrat and HS Eisenberg (Experimenters fromthe Racah Institute of Physics Hebrew University of Jerusalem) Entanglement Swapping betweenldquoPhotons have never Coexisted rdquohttpjournalsapsorgprlabstract101103PhysRevLett1102104035 JM Kovac et al ldquoDetection Of B-Mode Polarization at Degree Angular Statesrdquo 17 March 2014 lastrevised 18 march 2014 version V2 wwwarxivorggtastro-phgtarXiv14033985 andhttpbicepkeckorg (BICEP2 website)6 Julian Sonner 20-11-2013 ldquoHolographic Schwinger Effect and the Geometry of EntanglementrdquowwwprlapsorgabstractPRLv111i21e211603 and ldquoCreation of entanglement simultaneously givesrise to a wormholerdquo httpphysorgnews2013-12-creation-entanglement-simultaneously-wormholehtml7 SW Hawking DAMPT University of Cambridge UK ldquoInformation Preservation and WeatherForecasting for Black Holesrdquo wwwarxivorgabs140157618 James B Hartle SW Hawking Thomas Hertog Accelerated Expansion from Negative Λwwwarxivorgabs12053807 30 may 20129 Chuang-Feng Li et al ldquoRealization of QuantumWheelerrsquos Deelayed-Choice Experimentrdquopublished 19-08-2012 in Nature Photonics 6 600-604wwwnaturecomnphotonjournalv6n9fullnphoton2012179html10 Hans Christian von Bayer ldquoQuantum Weirdness It is all in your mindrdquo Scientific American 30846-51 (2013) wwwnaturecomscientificamericanjournalv308n6fullscientificamerican0613-46html published on line 14 may 201311 wwwenwikipediaorgwikiBloch_sphere (last modified 15-01-2014)12 Wilhelmus de Wilde 05-11-2012 ldquoThe Consciousness Connectionrdquohttpvixraorgabs1211001913 Sir Roger Penrose in foreword (March 2007) to ldquoQuantumAspects of Liferdquo (2008) by Derk Abott14 Nick E Mavromatos 2011 ldquoQuantum Coherence in (Brain) Microtubules and Efficient Energyand Information transportrdquo httpiopscienceioporg1742-6596329101202615 Aristotle Book 8 of ldquothe Physicsrdquo and Book 12 of ldquothe Metaphysicsrdquo16 Anton Zeilinger et al ldquoGeneration and Confirmation of a (100x100)-dimensional entangledQuantum Systemrdquo last revised 21 March 2014 wwwarxivorgabs1306009617 Andrei Linde wwwstanfordedu~alinde18 Juan Maldacena and Leonard Susskind 11-01-2013 ldquoCool Horizons for Entangled black Holesrdquowwwarxivorgpdf13060533pdf19 Carlo Rovelli and Francesca Vidotto 08-02-2014 ldquoPLANCK STARSrdquowwwarxivorgabs1401656220 Thibaud Taillefumier amp Marcelo O Magnasco ldquoA Phase Transition in the First passage of aBrownian Process through a fluctuating boundry implications for Neural Codingrdquo 26 June 2012httparxivorgabs1206612921 Vlatko Vedral ldquoProgress Article Quantifying entanglement in Macroscopic Systemsrdquo (june 2008Nature 453 1004-1007 httpwwwnaturecomnaturejournalv453n7198fullnature07124html22 Wilhelmus de Wilde 18-06-2013 ldquoTHE QUEST FOR THE PRIMAL SEQUENCErdquohttpfqxiorgcommunityforumtopic1810

15

REFERENCES

1 Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz 1710 ldquoEssays on the Goodness of God the Freedom of Man and theOrigin of Evilrdquo2 Wilhelmus de Wilde 06-12-2011 ldquoREALITIES OUT OF TOTAL SIMULTANEITYrdquowwwvixraorgabs111200133 Sean Carroll(Caltech) at a lecture for ldquoThe Fermilab Users Meeting 2013 ldquoParticles Fields and theFuture of Physics (11-07-2013) wwwyoutubecomwatchv=gEKSpZPByDOampfeature=youtube 4 E Megidish A Halevy T Shacham T Dvir L Dovrat and HS Eisenberg (Experimenters fromthe Racah Institute of Physics Hebrew University of Jerusalem) Entanglement Swapping betweenldquoPhotons have never Coexisted rdquohttpjournalsapsorgprlabstract101103PhysRevLett1102104035 JM Kovac et al ldquoDetection Of B-Mode Polarization at Degree Angular Statesrdquo 17 March 2014 lastrevised 18 march 2014 version V2 wwwarxivorggtastro-phgtarXiv14033985 andhttpbicepkeckorg (BICEP2 website)6 Julian Sonner 20-11-2013 ldquoHolographic Schwinger Effect and the Geometry of EntanglementrdquowwwprlapsorgabstractPRLv111i21e211603 and ldquoCreation of entanglement simultaneously givesrise to a wormholerdquo httpphysorgnews2013-12-creation-entanglement-simultaneously-wormholehtml7 SW Hawking DAMPT University of Cambridge UK ldquoInformation Preservation and WeatherForecasting for Black Holesrdquo wwwarxivorgabs140157618 James B Hartle SW Hawking Thomas Hertog Accelerated Expansion from Negative Λwwwarxivorgabs12053807 30 may 20129 Chuang-Feng Li et al ldquoRealization of QuantumWheelerrsquos Deelayed-Choice Experimentrdquopublished 19-08-2012 in Nature Photonics 6 600-604wwwnaturecomnphotonjournalv6n9fullnphoton2012179html10 Hans Christian von Bayer ldquoQuantum Weirdness It is all in your mindrdquo Scientific American 30846-51 (2013) wwwnaturecomscientificamericanjournalv308n6fullscientificamerican0613-46html published on line 14 may 201311 wwwenwikipediaorgwikiBloch_sphere (last modified 15-01-2014)12 Wilhelmus de Wilde 05-11-2012 ldquoThe Consciousness Connectionrdquohttpvixraorgabs1211001913 Sir Roger Penrose in foreword (March 2007) to ldquoQuantumAspects of Liferdquo (2008) by Derk Abott14 Nick E Mavromatos 2011 ldquoQuantum Coherence in (Brain) Microtubules and Efficient Energyand Information transportrdquo httpiopscienceioporg1742-6596329101202615 Aristotle Book 8 of ldquothe Physicsrdquo and Book 12 of ldquothe Metaphysicsrdquo16 Anton Zeilinger et al ldquoGeneration and Confirmation of a (100x100)-dimensional entangledQuantum Systemrdquo last revised 21 March 2014 wwwarxivorgabs1306009617 Andrei Linde wwwstanfordedu~alinde18 Juan Maldacena and Leonard Susskind 11-01-2013 ldquoCool Horizons for Entangled black Holesrdquowwwarxivorgpdf13060533pdf19 Carlo Rovelli and Francesca Vidotto 08-02-2014 ldquoPLANCK STARSrdquowwwarxivorgabs1401656220 Thibaud Taillefumier amp Marcelo O Magnasco ldquoA Phase Transition in the First passage of aBrownian Process through a fluctuating boundry implications for Neural Codingrdquo 26 June 2012httparxivorgabs1206612921 Vlatko Vedral ldquoProgress Article Quantifying entanglement in Macroscopic Systemsrdquo (june 2008Nature 453 1004-1007 httpwwwnaturecomnaturejournalv453n7198fullnature07124html22 Wilhelmus de Wilde 18-06-2013 ldquoTHE QUEST FOR THE PRIMAL SEQUENCErdquohttpfqxiorgcommunityforumtopic1810