Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1987.07 Spring 1987
SOUTHERN METHODIST UNII Statistical Quality Control Software: QSCA]J Analysis
David S. Savage
AL QUALITY CONTROL SOFTWARE:
QSCAN ANALYSIS
by David S. Savage Prepared for:
Dr. Richard Barr OREM 4390
Senior Design
DEPARTMENT OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT
SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING AND APPLIED SCIENCE
DALLAS, TEXAS 75275
I I
STATISTICAL QUALITY CONTROL SOFTWARE:
QSCAN ANALYSIS
by David S. Savage
Prepared for: Dr. Richard Barr
OREM 4390 Senior Design
This report examines the proliferation of statistical quality control software in the manufacturing industry. It focuses on one type of software, QScan Statistical Process Control.
May 8, 1987
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Summary ........................................1
II. Backgrounds and Descri ptions ....................2
A. Introduction ................................2
B. Definition of Quality .......................3
C. Design vs. Manufactured Quality .............4
D. Statistical Quality Control .................6
E. Process Control Charts ......................7
F. Industrial Process Control Software ..........9
III. Analysis of QScan ..............................11
A. Introduction ................................12
B. Analysis Mode ...............................12
C. Presentation Mode ...........................14
IV. Data Implementation Output ......................15
V.
Conclusions .....................................17
Diaqrams and Charts ..........................19-31
II I
I. SUMMARY
Process Control Software is revolutionizing the
Quality Control function of industry. Its effect on the
qualityand productivity of products and services in
today's modern industrial atmos phere cannot be underesti-
mated. Understanding how to apply the software to a
manufacturers needs is the point of this report. Sample
data was used to illustrate how QScan Statistical Process
Control Software can enhance the quality of any manufac-
turing process.
'The most important aspect of QScan is the ease and
applicability with which it can be applied and the flexi-
bility it offers large industries with many product lines.
Any manufacturing firm, large or small, can benefit from
the use of QScan or any other statistical process control
software, but QScan offers much more.
QScan opens the quqlity process to all levels in a
manufacturing organization, and promotes-the exchange of
information and ideas for quality and productivity improve-
ment. Managers qet direct access to meaningul information,
and their reports are enhanced by high-resolution graphics.
Line supervisors are able to perform immediate spot checks,
auickly entering new data and analyzing the results for
process status. Quality engineers can monitor and control
U manufacturing processes, design sampling plans, and determine
process capability.
I I
II. BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTIONS
A. Introduction
Quality control is a term that has received consi-
derable attention in the past few decades. The rise of
Japan into the secont most powerful nation in the free
world may account for this interest because of Japan's
success at beating foreign competitors in all areas of
quality and thus increasing the performance of their pro-
ducts and services. After WWII Japan faced the ominous
I test of rebuilding all of its industry from ruin. With the U.S.'s help, new factories and methods of production
were established and the beginnings of a new approach at
producing quality goods came about. One of the world's
I leading international quality consultants, Dr. W. Edwards
I .Deming, went to Japan in the post-WWII period to help them establish industries that relied on statistical quality
control. With his help, the Japanese created a method of
assuring quality in their products that even the U.S. en-
vied until it realized that Japan had "stolen" hundreds of
millions of dollars in foreign trade. It took this reali-
zation to move American industry into action and begin to
strive for quality.
Other factors affecting modern manufacturing and ser-
vice industries are increased customer quality requirements
1 2
I
Ii I I
and the development of new product technology. Part of
the new demand for higher quality products stems from Japan
Iand other foreign countries who have offered better pro-
ducts for Americans to buy, some at lower prices. The
I Japanese invasion into the American automobile industry is
I
a qood example. During the early 1970's, Toyota, Honda,
and other Japanese automobile companies introduced smaller
Iand cheaper cars into the American market. The most stri-
king feature of these cars, however, was their higher qua-
-I lity compared to American cars. The American automobile
I industry was not only forced to introduce the new "compact"
cars but also re-evaluate the quality standards they en-
forced. Japan's quality control methods played a large
part in the success of their automobiles.
I New technology in most industries has made it possible
manufacture products that provide more functions and
I
to
higher performance levels. This is another reason quality
Icontrol has become a major new functional area of all com-
panies that produce qoods and services. Products that are
more sensitive and operate at higher levels of performance
than ever before require more vigorous quality standards I and assurance.
B. Definition of Quality
I Products must meet the requirements of those who use
1 3
I U
them. Therefore, a general definition of quality is
"fitness for use." This definition is attributed to ano-
ther noted international quality consultant who worked with
Deming in Japan, Dr. Joseph M. Juran. It is especially
useful because it places emphasis on the consumer aspect
of quality. A more widely used definition of quality is
"conformance to requirements or specifications." Phil
Crosby has suggested that this definition is necessary be-
cause in order to manage quality adequately we must be able
to measure it.
Both of these definitions provide useful insights into
the nature of quality and combining them emphasizes that re-
quirements and specifications translate fitness for use into
measurable quantities. It is important to realize that qua-
lity doesn't necessarily mean high quality, it means unifor-
mity, consistency, and conformity to a standard or specifi-
cation. It is a statement of what the user, or consumer,
wants and can afford and what the producer can-provide.
Consequently, the producer and user must cooperate in defi-
ning a practical, reasonable, economical specification of
quality.
C. Design vs. Manufactured Quality
Manufacturers have always complained, "Quality costs
4I
I I
too much!" They would like to be able to compete with
higher quality manufacturers and producers but cannot jus-
tify the high expenditures this would require. The main
problem, however, is that they are failing to make the dis-
tinction between the two different aspects of quality -
"design quality" and "manufactured quality". This distin-
ction is quite important because, with a correct understan-
ding of these terms, it can be realized that good quality
and low cost can be achieved simultaneously.
I Design quality is usually what the confused manufac-
turers are referring to when they complain of high costs.
This quality of design, or product qrade, is a real cost.
When deciding what will appeal to potential customers, sup-
pliers of a new product or service must decide what it will
I cost them to produce the product or offer the service and
I what the consumers will be willing to pay for the product or service. Consequently, design quality must be considered
Icarefully in planning design, manufacture, and marketing
of new products or services.
I But design quality is not the only aspect of quality.
I
After design and manufacture, producers find that the manu-facturing process does not always produce each unit of pro-
duct in conformity to the design. Defects in materials,
parts, assemblies, and in the final product tend to arise. I 5
I
I I
When these defects are not related to design, they are the
result of incomplete, inadequate, or poorly controlled manu-
facturing processes. These products result in customer dis-
satisfaction and any defective or nonconforming materials,
parts, and finished products that must be discarded or re-
worked during manufacture result in increased cost. Manu-
factured quality is indeed an important aspect of quality
and can be called the quality of conformance to the design.
Higher design quality usually means higher cost, but higher
manufactured quality usually means lower cost.
D. Statistical Quality Control
Quality control is concerned with minimizing deviations
from manufactured quality. Juran's definition of quality
control is as follows: "Quality control is the regulatory
process through which we measure actual quality performance,
compare it with standards, and act on the difference."
Measurement includes all processes a manufacturer uses to
compare his product to a particular requirement or speci-
fication. These standards are determined by management as
design quality. "Acting on the difference" refers to the
assignment of causes of deviation in the manufacturing
process and correcting them.
6
jThe emphasis on the staistical aspects of quality -:
control motivated Deming to put forth the following defi-
nition: "The Statistical Control of Quality is application
of statistical principles and techniques in all stages of
design, production, maintenance and service, directed toward
the economic 'satisfaction of demand'." Statistical quality
control is most important because it is the only way to
significantly improve industrial quality and productivity
while making substantial reductions in the costs of quality.
These quality costs have become much larqer for companies
usinq existing quality-assurance practices that don't in-
clude statistical analysis.
E. Process Control Charts
As mentioned previously, manufactured quality pertains
to how well a product conforms to its desitn. All produc-
tion processes contain a certain amount of inherent or
natural variability that cannot be avoided. This natural
variability or "background noise" is the cumulative effect
of many small, uncontrollable causes. When this variability
is relatively small, it is usually considered to be an
acceptable level of process performance. Statistical
quality control allows for this backqround noise and it
is often called a "stable system of chance causes." A
1:1
II
manufacturing process that is operating with only chance
causes of variation is said to be "in statisctical control."
Unfortunately, other kinds of variability occasion-
ally present themselves in the output of a process. This
variability in key quality characteristics usually arises
from three main sources: improperly adjusted machines,
operator errors, and defective raw materials. Such varia-
bility is generally larger than chance background noise,
and usually represents an unacceptable level of quality
performance. These sources of variability that are not
part of the chance deviations of design are called assign-
able causes. Any process that is operating in the presence
of assignable causes is said to be "out-of-control."
Usually, production processes o perate in the in-con-
trol state for relatively long periods of time producing
acceptable products that conform to specifications. Assign-
able causes,-..however, occur at random, resulting in a
change to the out-of-control state where a larger propor-
tion of the process output does not conform to design spe-
cifications. The major objective of statistical quality
control is to detect this occurrence of assignable causes
and the resulting out-of-control state so that corrective
action may be undertaken and a return to-proper control can
8
II
be established.
Control charts represent the major tool for manufac-
turers to use in detecting out-of-control processes on-
line. They may also provide information useful in impro-
ving the process and thus improving product quality. Con-
trol charts use a center line that represents the averaqe
value of a ouality characteristic in the in-control state.
Two other horizontal lines, called the upper control limit
(UCL) and the lower control limit (LCL), are also shown
on the chart. These control limits are determined using
basic statistical techniques and give a definite area of
process control. Points that fall outside - the limits sug-
gest that the process may be out-of-control and should be
investigated.
F. Industrial Process Control Software
Industrial environments present a unique set of per-
formance and reliability requirements for industrial pro-
cess control software. Manufacturing systems can vary
from small job shops with manual data collection to larqe
continuous processes with automatic data collection invol-
ving micro, mini, and mainframe computers. Process control
software must accomodate these larqe manufacturers with
easily accessible data and flexible applications for dif -
I
9
ferent types of analysis.
In qeneral, statistical process control systems have
these requirements:
- Orqanizational Support
- Data Collection
- Data Manaqement
- Data Reduction
- Data Presentation
- Applications Development
Industrial Process control involves a variety of orqa-
nizational units with different styles and requirements.
Many different product lines, each with its own needs, may
use the process control software and require their own
independent applications.
Data collection is perhaps the most important require-
ment for it is the basis of quality control. It must be
flexible so as to accomodate different types of data input.
The software must support manual and automatic data collec-
tion as well as entry from automatic data ac quisition hard-
ware such as testing and sensing equipment within the manu-
facturing process. An interface with data base manaqement
systems is also required for broad perspectives of parti-
cular quality characteristics.
Data management requires the handling of large volumes
10
of files of various types because of the many different
quality characteristics that can be measured. Updating
frequency requirements for the different characteristics
may vary and must be completely flexible. Users need access
to all of the data in order to update, review, and create
multiple concurrent files. The software must support these
files containing descriptive as well as quantitative infor-
mation.
• Data reduction that is fast, powerful, and flexible
is required for effective statistical analysis. Large
manufacturing processes may su pply the user with huge loads
of data that could not possibly be handled manually.
Data presentation requires a comprehensive set of con-
trol charts that can be customized and standardized to pro-
duce regular process control reports for manaqement. And
applications development must be reliable for critical and
important industrial applications. Also, software compati-
bility, portability, and expandability provide a manufacturer
with an added deqree of freedom.
III. ANALYSIS OF QSCAN
A. Introduction
QScan is state-of-the-art statistical process control
11
software. It combines several new and unique features
that facilitate easy and quick quality analysis:
- Statscope: for viewing, editing and analyzing a
process.
- fjhartboard: for comparing views of one or more
processes.
- Slideshow: for presentations and reports.
These features will be discusses in more detail later.
QScan is operated with the aid of integrated functions:
- Analysis Mode : to enter, edit and anlyze process
control data, charts, and statistics.
- Presentation Mode: to produce Slideshows for reports
and presentations.
B. Analysis Mode
Analysis Mode is the cornerstone of QScan. The pri-
mary tool in Analysis Mode is Process Control Analysis:
a complete set of control charts and statistics for moni-
toring industrial processea &nd analyzing process capabi-
lity. It offers both analytical and presentationcontrol
charts and diagrams for determining quality and productivity.
Statscope displays analytical control charts, and Chart-
board creates presentation control charts, that can be saved
as Slides for Slideshow presentations and reports.
12
I I
Process Control Analysis provides the user with an
easy way to monitor any industrial process. There are
three distinct phases to recording and analyzing process
control data:
1) Defining Control Charts (Setup) - After a quality characteristic has been selected and a method for measurement has been determined, the parameters of the control chart can be set. These parameters are a function of the variability of the process. The center line and control limits represent in-control processes. The objective is to find out and eliminate assignable causes that may produce out-of-control conditions.
2) Monitoring the Process - Once the process is stable and the control limits defined, new samples are taken to confirm that the process remains in control. Every sample represents a new point on the charts. Control limits remain the same and the new samples are compared with the extablished control limits. QScan automatically evaluates and plots new points, and Warning Rules indicate when a particular quality characteristic is out-of-control.
3) Updating Control Charts - When a problem is detected, the manufacturing process should be studied, the problem identified, and the process corrected. After corrective action, new control limits must be established, and the process is monitored as before.
Statscope provides complete command over process
control charts, and includes an intelligent control chart
Editor that makes data entry and updating quick and easy.
Many different statistics and samples can be viewed and
monitored.
Chartboard displays different viewsbf the same data
file, and the same view of different files. Control
13
III charts can rapidly be scanned and compared with other data
files representing lines of control such as products,
Iassembly lines, or plants. For example, Statscope may
determine that a problem exists with the variability of I a process. It can analyze the specific samples during
I
that time frame, and Chartboard can then accomodate scanning
through several different control charts and diagrams for
Ithese particular samples. This allows manufacturers to
quickly determine the actual cause of the problem and take
corrective action.
C. Presentation Mode
IThe Presentation Mode in QScan provides users with an
ideal way of creating process control presentations. Slides
Ithat have been from the Chartboard function in the saved
I
Analysis Mode can be individually displayed, edited and
pointed, or collected together and organized into Slideshows.
ISlideshows can be arranged in the user's preferred fashion.
Slides are collected and or qanizedin Slideshows as
I"trays." They can be moved around an organized so as to
present a certain point that a system analyst may want to
convey. In this way, the Presentation Mode turns a QScan
workstation into a sort of slide projector. This is quite
useful for process control analysts giving reports, demon-
strations, or presentations.
1 14
IV. DATA IMPLEMENTATION AND OUTPUT
The data used in the analysis was received in Lotus
form. Two different kinds of processes provided the data
to analyze with QScan. The first process involves refining
a type of resin in a chemical reaction. Four different
data groups, the percentage of volatile resin content,
the percentage of resin solids, the percentage of resin
flow at 100 psi, and the quantity of prepreqnated gel at
3200 F gave statistics that were grouped in samples of 20.
The second process involves manufacturing side wall
panels in the interior shop. Defects in these panels were
sight identified and the rework time is also given.
Because the data was in Lotus form, it was required to
format the data into an acceptable im porting form for QScan.
The following page shows the specified format for importing
data into QScan.
The analysis of the percentage of volatile resin will
be oresented in this paper as an example of QScan capabilities.
The first table presents the appropriate data file, %Vol.Pcd,
but only the first sample of 25. The only required aspects
of the file are the [Type] and [Sample] commands. The data
itself may be listed horizontally or vertically.
After the data file has been loaded onto QScan, the
Parameter Specification Pa ge lists pertinent specifications
15
II
and parameters such as the sigma multiple (defaulted to
3.0), the Geometric Moving Avera qe Weight (defaulted to
0.2), and Cumulative Sum parameters. This page also
displays the Status of the particular process (out-of-
control for % volatile content), or a histogram, and
basic control charts.
A sample of Statscope is also included. For %Vol.Pcd,
this example shows sample #7, its number of observations
(20) and a histogram of its values. X-bar, X-min, and
X-max are given, as is the range (R). Statscope is useful
because it can move quickly from sample to sample in order
to compare and analyze different samples over time.
Next, 7 different control charts from Chartboard are
presented. Process Status (a histogram of the entire file,
aiving the number of observations with control limits), a
Ranges control chart (showing the ranges of individual sam-
ples), a Variability control chart (showing the standard
deviations of samples), a Cumulative Sums of X-bar chart
(showing the control mean of samples based on the cumulative
sum of deviations of the sample means), a Geometric Moving
Average of X-bar chart (showing the mean of samples based
on the qeometric moving average of the sample means), and
an X-bar chart itself are included next. Also, the Process
Status charts for the other 4 processes analyzed are inclu-
16
ded. Another beneficial aspect of QScan is that X-bar and
R charts may be shown on the same screen for better percep-
tion of the process. This is shown for the percentaqe of
Resin Solids data.
V. CONCLUSIONS
QScan statistical quality control software offers manu-
facturers a complete monitoring process of all production
functions. Its most beneficial characteristic is that
while it can accomodate the most demanding quality control
requriements, anyone in the manufacturing or qanization can
use QScan's results and a pply its answers to increase pro-
ductivity.
In any manufacturing process, quality has become an
important business strateqy. Higher demands on quality and
increased technology have caused all producers to re-evaluate
their production techni ques. One technique that has estab-
lished itself as a required function for manufacturing is
statistical process control software. Today's modern in-
dustrial atmosphere makes this software essential for larqe
industries with huge product lines or production techniques.
QScan offers state-of-the-art process control and serves
manufacturers in promoting the exchange of information and
ideas for quality and productivity improvement.
17
If time had permitted, a more thorough study of
different aspects of QScan not covered here would have
been interesting. Economic Modeling and Analysis in
QScan can provide a general strateqy for formulating mo-
dels describing various problem operational activities
and their associated costs. Management can then see how
different solutions will affect profits. QScan can also
provide interesting analysis of multivariate process
control, nonconformities Process control (U-charts, C-
charts, and pareto dia grams), and nonconforming process
control (P-charts and na-charts.)
18
19
I
LiI
ITLE:::. /. VOLATIL YPE> VARIABLE
1PLY 1•
I-' 4.3 5.0
5.0 4.7
4.7
F 4.6 4 4.8
'. 4.9 5. 0 4.
• 4.8 TNE*22 F'BMayB7-10: 0i
I1 - • \./uflI Prn 1 7. VOLATILE CONTENT -.
1—Edit the Active File Press .(ENTEf : to edit-]
I!rY-P'E VARIABLE NUMBER OF SAMPLES 25 . Status Data t ef aLd t Values! Setup Process
,Out..of Control,. Upper Specification 5.6 Tolerance Nominal Value 4.6 ± 1.0
A
pecifications Lower Specification :3.7 Number Format 3 . 1 per 5.6 Use Range Charts? Yes Sample Size Variable
.Nom._ 4.6 Sigma Multiple 3.0 GMA Weight . 2,..
I er— 3.7
Control Limits Calculated within the Estimation Range Estimation Ran ge Samples to
Active Range: Samples to
Cusurn Parameters: Lower Upper _. -------------------- 1Jec ci on Interval 4.000 . . ..___4.. 000.
Reference Value 0.500 C). 500 Heacetart 2.000 2. 000 ..-.
—
Fi le B. \ /.VOL. F - Act i ve Estimation i.E #6 of W h VOLATILE CONTENT
Edit the Active File Press <ENTER: to edit this sample.
YPE VARIABLE NUMBER OF SAMPLES 25 - Histogram - - Data
8M-L.E 6 NuMkE.!: OF OBSERVATIONS 20
--
CUMMEi'
LL;L X--bar 4.. UCL
L.CL. 0. k . UCL
L.CL. 0.2 5 0.1 UCL
LOL. 4.,6 GMA 4.6 UCL
Loe'r Cue..: --0.7 Upper Cusum
- 5May57— :-j4a-
(Variable)
4.8
1.9
0.
4.7
U
I 20
I
I
I
I
SI 1ttEV,:,3
k2k)
too
I.!O
160
1
I
Io
Process Status V UOLATILE CONTENT
YIELD: 97 4 X UP1FALLOUI: 1: I It EUI I
I'lllT i I 1i'
I I PI I LL I I I Ii'
I 1 . H II
; yII I •.I ; I
• 15 Iv8 7
I
I
I
I
I
"r L1 ' r r :.r r rr• r r 1. I1 ..1 - •.1 j,Ijj J,J diV..'
21
Ran cies x VOLATILE CONTENT1 4.
Li
:ft•
6
7I , fr fr I
Li I I I I 1 I I I I
Li 1
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I * I I I I I I I I I
I I
1. l'i
I I I I I. I I I
I I • 1. I I I.
is
I.IS
6
I I I
4.4:lIj1[i-• ----------- J!JJ;;,jJ!JjU.,1LLI.ilLv.lLi!Li.
22
I
311:
•1 La'
UariaJi ii ty z VOLATILE CONTENT
I
I I I I I I
pII"I
I I -rr ,
(I I
I I I31)
I I I La
I :! I
I I I
23
I
I 2.4
I Liii
•0
I -12
I •
4100
0
'Ii I
III I I I Cusu of 5 Chart
X UOLATILE CONTENT
I -b10i) 1i' 1 i: ILi 1 R. :iUA '• i' '.'
7
I I 24
I
4. 721
Ii i,bv
'1.
II
Ii ?. -i t. L)i
4160
III E;:;
ij ,r I
La rL
La Ii 'Li
U I I I I I U I I U U I I U U IL IC i' i' i i 'ii :'i •;':'':':''u'c
I:i JI .•( Li 1 Li..'
La I fir I p •
Li 1 i Li
La 1.54 1" _I p.•l
GMA of R Chart •, U1TTTTE F1JTt'IJT11.I'i £.L4L.i 'i.i'w'I.&L.iI.
Et v 87
Li I
Li ñ' 1 i.t 1•1
LI
LI
4.3 2
U )IJ
I I
I.
ii .:iic
Averages < UOLATILE CONTENT
' 11 ii ti 17 Lo Li
I I I 26
I I I I I I 1
rDcr1 r LrIluL SjD1DE.: Li uiI Iv
Process Status Y. RESIN SOLIDS
• '' i lID (II I AlIT1 A '
IJLLL'i //IVuI. Ut ii IILLYUt i '. I A CIJ1 LOUT: • A
i i'
P J I..'' i P IILLYU P i Y '
ll 1r irTu ltrj JLILL 0 0ItEiJI '1tiT1 H II AA JLiiHJ1QJ
15(i I riL I iT1 I I 1
L J I3V
r H
!IHHL=-fl •1ii i111F1hiIIiII_4l _____ I I • {
t L I I I I I J • i•I _____ ..._I._p_P_I I P •.!_j ____
• P I t H P I P P I
• U I' I I U U L i• • • I It HP IIJ I
Ii I i I k, IIIP H H1l_H...fIH P ifli H tIt.i1•I HIHL& !i pIP .114111
H I Li IC I 1[ l I, iJ '1 • 4 •
.H/ I44_j. .III !PM Y I Y •
I
27
I •I•• •
c it it c it c n n c it c it c it 1I 111 fii ii 111 jH '44 !4 J4 JH £'1 r4 ,fi 41! ii (i'
•. •: . I . .: = i i i J J L i J J J L I J L .L .1. i J .L J L .L La
I I I I I .1 I
it.. JERRE: 133 10. DEQ. 1 •$Li
15$ IL:
Ii$ I' I.'
I I
Process Status x FLOW @ 10 PSI
ItT F fl Lj.' UD C I ,IIT A I Lt.LL' Ii.
UP, & I ILL''U I i Vi '.',.
Ill FHLLIIU : U II,"
1! (qAfl' H 4 H
Ill r1
I IIII
t I 1) I i! :': .L L& 'L" LI Y La i i& '
Hr=-tH I . •. .: i•
I •.I I :...••I
I: .1 .1 •• 1. I ____
I.. .t I
.. .. •..
till
1 .1 .1 .(
I....:. I: __________
: •I . . .1 . .1 I . I i 1 1 :1 F t . I .. .1
; ! ! . ! I .1 ......!..... t I I I :.
U fj IU Li':' r:' r fL 't:i '-.1 • i I) I! I I •I II I• i II f iI ii i
I I-I
'1j
'l
I I I I I
I I
M [Ro6r, 51) 5
0113-5.
juu'evI
1105
I0
''U
Process Status PREPREG GEL 320 F
ItTfl n IJ.LLLi .Lai.Li
it
P P PP
i ir 1 II n AH V
III i
29
Process Status DEFECTS PER SIDE WALL PANEL
U TEl r I iA LID PI' iI A
L,(re' TTL Yh 1 '' 'i f .LLLL' i .L'. i ! I
I T i I tILL'IJ it
I.
L I i I ___
IS
Itat 1 1 1 I .1 I
I I I I I F I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • 1 I I• I I I I I I
hill 1 1 1 1 I I _____ I I I
I .1I
1I 1 1
I .1. I Ii I
I•.I I I
I. I I 1 .1 I U
I I I I
i •:' A I 1f A 4 AI I :! II I t r A I I ' .' V ! '' i V I . z V I L ta • V I J. . , '. I 5L V .
1.5 5 5 libS 13.5 1,5;
Ij
Hi
H'
lT
1DEV1: II
La
Lill it
1k!;
1)
I • -3'
30
I
.I I
.I _I
Averages and Uariability V. RESIN SOLIDS
35. 13 i : : i i i 11 i i i i 11 i i i i i
.u' .i. ...' j.i...' ..v j. ii.' •1 IC•
j(_! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
4 •) _-- -.____________________ -__. . . .. . . . .........
..............I ..................... i I I I I I 1 . .1 . I 1 i .1
.: . 1 ................,:.. ... . . . . . .. .-
)C I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I t I I I I I I I I I I I I -
11 JA, J. .L J... .L i.'.' i..' i.1 L81Ai..'
1
11017
31