113
The Degree of Practicing Teacher and Student Roles in Active Learning in Light of some Variables from Secondary Stage Teachers and Students Point of View in the State of Kuwait / 2015

ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

! "#

$ #

The Degree of Practicing Teacher and Student Roles in Active

Learning in Light of some Variables from Secondary Stage

Teachers and Students Point of View in the State of Kuwait

%&

'

(&

% ) $ *+

, # - % '. # /0$ 1*2 / 4.5

6 7 82

82 9: ;,

; ; $;;# ;

;+ 7; ;;

$2015

Page 2: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

ب

Page 3: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

ج

Page 4: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

د

;2:

أم إها إ

ر ا واء

..................واي

"ا* ( ا )#' & %$# و#"

..................وا+

ر3ق در0 إ.-ا وأ.-ا+ ا,%اء

Page 5: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

< ;$

… .

!" … #$ % #& '( )($ *+% , - %

+%# .%/ '0 '# %#&… ..

% '1 +1 - % ( 1 2 / %

% 34 1 *5 3 #& 61 ' "7 %&

%4 % + & .

1 & ,% / 58 5 ."&1 % '1

#5 3 58 ' % / *.

' ) '& + 38 2# +%# !% $

.

Page 6: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

و

=,

ا اع

+ 1

9%7 ,

58 5 8 :

.-

%

2% 5;8

5;8 <

=( 5;8

5% 5># ?0# @

5%%#- 5># ?0# +

'.> '+ :'.> '+ < % 1

%4 2

5 5# 7

4#;1 5 6 8

Page 7: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

ز

5 5%1 9

5 2#A$ 10

5 11

5 2 11

'.> :+ <# 12

/ , B 13

5 2 27

@ '.> : : < 34

'0 C D4 35

5 ! 35

5 5%& 35

5 1 37

2%>5 39

5%;$E 5 40

5 2. 41

A# '.> :;;; 8;;;;= 42

8= 43

'.> 65 : . 8= , 65

Page 8: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

ح

D; 58 66

2%$ 77

! 79

5% ! 80

5%/ ! 84

Page 9: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

ط

,' =

, ' % ,

>.

1 +%# 5%& 1 F. 35

2 5#A 5%& 1 F. 35

3 2A 5% 2- 5%% , 5 5 '# '# A + 54 B # 5# 5%I 5 2% 5 J%.

41

4 2A 5% 2- 5%% , 5 5 ,A '# A + 54 B # 5# 5%I 5 2% 5 J%.

46

5 2A 5% 2- 5%% , 5 5 '# '# A + 54 B 5#A 5# 5%I 5 2% 5 J%.

48

6 2A 5% 2- 5%% , 5 5 ,A '# A + 54 B 5#A 5# 5%I 5 2% 5 J%.

52

7 A +% +% 5 5 '# '# A 5 5 ,A '# A 5 2%.

55

Page 10: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

ي

8 2A 5% 2- 5%% 5 '# '# A %> *P 0) t-test.(

56

9 2A 5% 2- 5%% 5 5 '# '# A *%> %> S #.

57

10 %# +% / %- 5- =7 5 5 '# '# A %> S # .

58

11 2A 5% 2- 5%% 5 5 '# '# A *%> %> )0.

58

12 %# +% / %- 5- =7 5 5 '# '# A %> )0 .

59

13 2A 5% 2- 5%% 5 5 ,A '# A %> *P 0) t-test.(

60

14 2A 5% 2- 5%% 5 5 ,A '# *A %> W .

61

15 %# +% / %- 5- =7 5 5 ,A '# A %> W .

62

Page 11: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

ك

7B =,

, C >.

1 =#) 1 (5 '# '# A A 81

2 =#) 2 (5 ,A '# A 88

3 =#) 3 (5;8 1 5 93

Page 12: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

ل

"#

$ # !

%&

(&

% ) $ *+

45

6 5 3 2 '# ,A '# + 5 5

5 4#A 5%I 5# # B 54 + *2%> 9 ." *A

2% .

' 8 %0 5%& *5%& C% !8 %0- *5$ 2% 5A #& X#

5% 1 &)95 ( *J#)105( *2# )192 ( *JA)208 ( J5A. 28

/ 5- * +% . 5I : 2" *A '# '# 5

)55 () .5%I 5- : 2" *A '# ,A 5)21 () .

5 1 =$ + = ' + +% + & #& 5%/ 4$ 4"

5%/ 2 9 P% =A D +%$$0 P% 5;% ."&1

5%% .28 5I +%%A +%- 2I + = :/ 5%A : 5%A

0- )& 0-)test–retest :( 8 '# 5- +% A X#

A '# )0.83 . ( A '# ,A 5-)0.84 .( 5%A 1

Page 13: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

م

5 '0 ' 5%I "71 [) "Cronbach’s Alpha( , @ *

#0 =- 2I . '# 5- + A '# )0.80( 5- *

A '# ,A)0.85.(

2A 5I 20 *5 5#;1 +& 5E 1 + *2% %#

;$E 0- *+% A *5%% 2- *5%)2( *

/ +% %#D; 24B 8 * 5%\:

] +1 B 54 + A '# ,A '# + 5 5

*2% 5 5%I 5# #2 5A.

] +1 5 ,A '# 5 '# A + 54 B 5#A

5# 5%I 5 *2% 2 5A.

] '# '# 5 5 +% 5 5%;$ 5- 2 58(&

54 + *2% 5 A '# ,A 5 5 *A

J 5#A +%# B.

] = 2 5- 5%;$ & W )0.05≤α( 5 5 '#

#' A J %> P 5 *5%# C% + =7 ^$ CE.

] '& = 2 5- 5%;$ & W )0.05≤α( 5 5

'# '# A *J %> S # )0 '##.

] '& = 2 5- 5%;$ & W )0.05≤α( 5 5

,A '# A *J %> P W ,A#.

Page 14: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

ن

The Degree of Practicing Teacher and Student Roles in Active

Learning in Light of some Variables from Secondary Stage

Teachers and Students Point of View in the State of Kuwait

Prepared by

Fatima Al-Rasheede

Supervised by

Prof. Jawdat Ahmad Al-Massaeed

ABSTRACT

This study aimed at identifying the degree of practicing teacher and

student roles in active learning in light of some variables from secondary

stage teachers and students point of view in the state of Kuwait.

Cluster Sample was selected, and it consisted of (95) male teachers,

(105) female teachers, and (192) male students, (208) female students.

The researcher built two questionnaires, the first one was about the role

of the teacher in active learning, it consisted of (55) items . The second

questionnaire dealt with the role of the student in active learning, it

consisted of (21) items .The validity of the two tools was insured by

distributing them to a group of jury who were specialists in curriculum

and teaching methods in some Kuwaiti and Jordanian universities. The

researcher also assured the reliability of the tow instruments by using

test-retest method and The Pearson correlation coefficient and they

were (0.83) and (0.84). The researcher also used "Cronbach's alpha"

equation to calculate the reliability coefficient of internal consistency. It

was (0.80) for the role of the teacher in active learning, and (0.85) for

the role of the student in active learning .

Page 15: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

س

Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test,

and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results

showed the following:

- The degree of practicing teacher and student roles in active learning

from the secondary school teachers point of view was medium.

- The degree of practicing teacher and student roles in active learning

from secondary school students point of view was medium.

- There were positive statistically significant relationship between the

practicing degree of the teacher's role in active learning and the

practicing degree of the student role in active learning in the State of

Kuwait point of view.

- There were statistically significant differences at the level (0.05 ≥ α) in

the practicing degree of the teacher's role in active learning due to the

on the sex Variable, in favor of females teachers.

- There were no statistically significant differences at the level (0.05 ≥ α)

in in the practicing degree teacher's role in active learning due to

variables of academic qualification and experience of the teacher.

- There were no statistically significant differences at the level (0.05 ≥ α)

in the practicing of the role of the student in active learning due to the

sex and academic level of the student.

Page 16: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

1

ا اول

را

Page 17: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

2

ا اول

را

:

P , 6#0 _& _ & )& ' 4% 8 *+E )%

5% `% 58 %a 5#; 5% )I ' +& =I . 2A 34 -

5% 2 + %> *' 5% 'B #& 4(B # +1 5% 5%

%A 4 )7- =% *2A 3 5 W0/5% 4B . # @ +%

+ *5% 2S 4%#& 6 4B '%# '# 2%#& 2 +% 64

b% *2%I 5%a 5% 5;% ,#A *5I% P% 2%% ,%1 (0

# ,A %7 '4 +1 +% + J- *'# 5%#& _%% J

+%# # %#.

6 '# 4% '% 5%%# )" 5%A +1 *5% C/ D; 2% 8

- 5%A 34 *,> ); % 4(0 +# 2$% '4

=A %A ) 2& 4B & * '# '# 5%#& + % P%

=# 5# 1 58 1 5 1 ).8 +# @4% *# +1 *#%

=#% % '% ,% %# %# 5%# 2%# 0% #%

)* &2010.(

Page 18: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

3

=% 4B 2%4 + *+% % ^#A$ =#A1 %#& +4 2%B

'# '%# "'# A "* '- 4 ^#A$ ! A 'B '% #

2 + / 5%7/ 5II)* 2010.(

+0c ) 1 )2011 ( 41 ?;$0 + 5& %% A '# +1

2%% '- *24 , '# ,A 5%S #& 3%

*5% = 24 '# 2A0 b *5" '# 5A/ '-

'- * _$ P% '## _% '# & *2( 54 2&

'# )8 *58I '%% 2% #& &- *5%8 2( +"% '#

& ,%1 '0 5 '# 20 #& . #& '- *FE + #

!% 5"E *+%# !% + 5%& 28 #& '; *5 5%>

A '# =%A 2. < P% =;A.

I% / @ *5%" )% 2 W #& J% J A '# 8- 8

+% *# .>$E I 5%% 5%# 5A/ 5%%# =A + %%>

+# 4% @4% *5%% 2 2% 5A1 *5$ 28 5#%A 2B(

4 .- 5 5#A 28 4B 64)Prince,2004.(

A '# *# %# 68 '# 5%% #& 5% 57#

*'# %7 S 5%% 2.E 5% 2 + _& +"

=%A +& 5## '# $% 'I + *,% C (0 + '# '% C%

#& &- #& % - 4 *2- '% +% 24 , @ *7

Page 19: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

4

'# & #& *2( #& ) %7 5% #& +%# B7

. ,#/ #& 2# , #& +% - A '# % +

'% 24 2# @# A ,A ,% . #& ';8 '# A '#

'# 5 #& @# A1 4& D% *'# 4% 57#0 5A/

# %# 68 5%%E 5#&7)*$&2001.(

% + '% *'## 5%%E 5 A #& '# + F

% 4% '# 6 2 5%# 2.E 5A/ + 5& '0 4(0 .

#& ) '4% + *'# +% ,(A % A '# +1 ;- %

*'# '# +% 5 5 5%%# 5%# % *6 24 ,

I- *4 + % #& 3& '# 5%#& ,A =& #& !% @

*A '## 5& 5%%# 5;% + )7- *5%# I/ '# A

4#% 5% ))*%2008.(

P%I W )Mathewes,2006( +1 '# ,A 4% D% 5%A +& )& A

2# # + - *40 1 6$ 5a . *'# 5A1 6#0 5%#&7

'% *5%# 5%A P 6 +" +%0\ 5 #& '# !%

5%& '# 2& 5 2-S <A 4##0% *)%>$ 2&.

*'# 5%#& A 5#A > 5%#& 1 #& A '# B%

b %7 5 ). C% + % - J- *=%A 5 2%# +% *

57#0 4b 2# 5%#& #& $8- +)Felder & Brent,1997.(

Page 20: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

5

/ 64 =% *,A '# +% 5 5%#& 5%# 5%%# 5%#

7 J$ % +E . . 5%/ X _ 4% '# S%

(A +% *5%# 34 7 1 @ *)A0 . + +

J%" J4 '# . 3& *(A 2# P/ A% '# %

5%#& % ?04%% #& % '# . >% &8 $& + , 3

5%#&7 4 '% 4& %#& ) *+%2010.(

% +4 %A )$ 5& #& P%; ,A# 5%#

*5% 7$ J# *JA *7% *d8% <A% *5#;/ $% 5 7 .1

'# 4 % 'B ! ,A# $# *5 + (0 '%B 5;% '#

5#&7 +" ,%1 P% ?7 % +% )IE *3%7 37 #& C

*.$- $# 5 *4 C < + % +% ;(

)* 2010.(

% '# %> S% 1 *A '# 5%/ 2&- +

) 68 %% *%# 68 #& A%% - 4 *'## 4

* 64 +%# % C% *5% <A $ 5%1 24 'E ,#A%

%a )%I 58 5%%# 68 '%$ *28 ) 5#;/ . +%

6 )& #& '4& ,(A % A%A0 *5 3 '## P/

'4 5#A & )& ! *=; '1 #& .I 1 *@ / ,#A

'4%)* 12011.(

Page 21: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

6

+ 5%A '# A 5%# *5%%# % '# %>% + $& 0

# 6%" 5%#& '# '%# *5% I1 5%% J ! '#

A 31 *57#0 ^$b '# & '## *A 4 %A ,% ,(A

*%#& ^$1 J"%1 * & ) 68 %# # )0 *.

)& 5#A #& , 24 27$ 5%% ,a 4%) *2010(.

% ,A '/ 5%# 5%%# *5%e# P%; ,% +1

Af#g% %#& ." .4 2 57#7 2%g 4%#& @# *D +h 41 i,$ #&

7 # 7A &- *,A# ^$% 5 0)i% +

2 * J$& J- *JA J8 #& i 2%S .&/ #j #&

*# J(&7 ! C/ i * J 24# 5%/ 3& k *2(

J 6i%# ! 6B *4%% JB% 2%># %%5 5%&- 5%$8-

*5%# J% #A @# 2%>) * &2011.(

= 5%#& '# *A +h '# - 7% 3 '%# 24 *'# -

+ % ,A#) * 2011 .( '# A 5%# 5%%# 5%#

,A %>% + $& 0 # *2## 1 ?0

'%# '# 28 * $ '4 *% % 5%#& '# 5%#& 5 ,A#

@% '# ' 5A/ D 5%%# 5%# 4A%A0) & 1

*&2012.(

Page 22: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

7

% =% * A '# =% ,A '# 5%1 = ^"%

4% ,a 5% ;7 + .$ 5% 5 2. + 5 5

%> + & B *A '# ,A '# + 5# # B 54 + 2

4#A 5%I.

$ :

*5% 5%%# 5%# 5% IS '4 $ *'# +

4% 5%%# 5%# D A . '# @ '% +1 " + h *

/ + (A % #& J% P *5%% +% '4

5& '%8 2 24 6 . 2%7 ,% *@ '% +1 +% -

1 #& '%# #S *6$ 0 4% 5%% . + - h * +

b '- 5 5% 2 #& A ! '.( '#

% ! *A 5#A & 5# J(8 '# % '# *5 0

) J1 .'# '%# 5%# B 6(0 '## )% / 3 6#0 *

P% 2%% + %.

5% 2%## % '- 1 8 ! 3A 7 +/ JB

5% 27#7 9 5I% 5% 27# 4B ! *5 40 'I + 4(0

% +% ' '## )% 1 2 *5%8 + 4%S . 8 ,A +1

'# +% C% *'# '%# %#& 3 %7 + - *0\ %>

Page 23: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

8

0 4% 5#& 5 '# @% C% *6$ 5a 0 5%# 5%%# 5%#

1 *# ! P% *6$5%%# 5%# A @ '# +1 .

5% %#& % % *" + 5%4 A '# '47 4B JB

+0c ) +)2011( 5 2 C 9 . *

@ +1 5I 2B- * '# 2%% #& 2 2 9

,A 1 '# ' 2 @# +1 - *'%# '# 5%#& A

+ F @ + ) 6/ =% 5 W *A '#

'# . ' . =#A + A '# ,A '# + $ 5I

% !8 5 5.

=) (2 :

*A '# ,A '# + 5 5 $ 5 3 2

'# ?0 2%> + & ." 5%I 5# # B 54 + ,A

5%\ 5#;/ +& 5E (0 + @ *2% 5 4#A:

'+ 'D: 5# # B 54 + *A '# '# 5 5

l2% 5 5%I

'D : ,A 5 5 B 54 + *A '# # 5#

l2% 5 5%I

Page 24: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

9

@ 'D: 5# 5#A B 54 + *A '# '# 5 5

l2% 5 5%I

A# 'D : ,A 5 5 B 54 + *A '# 5#A 5#

l2% 5 5%I

65 'D: 58(& 2 5- 5%;$ W &5-) 0.05 ≤ α (+% 5

A '# '# 5 5 5 A '# ,A

l2% 5

6 'D: & 5%;$ 5- 2 = 5- W)0.05 ≤ α ( 5

5 # S P 2%> W *A '# '#

l'## )0

A# 'D : 5- W & 5%;$ 5- 2 = )0.05 ≤ α ( 5

5 P 2%> W *A '# ,A W

l,A#

2):

5%1 5 5% + (0 . ." #& + '# ,A '#

*A @ +h 3 5 8 %7 J( +:

] # 5# 5%I *?0 '% .A& 3 5# + 5%1 %5 5%#

5% 5%$$0 ?;$0 +%# 3 5# *5% +%# +%

Page 25: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

10

*'& S% '% %$7 5%" 1 '# ,A '#

A.

] % P '%% .1 +%# '1 '# A.

] +%% %A D 5% * C% +$% #& '# ,A

4#%7 2%%- 5 % '# %7 D '0 '# A .

] +%I + 1 . % + C F" '# A .

. (:

:" '4 ^ 5& 5Ab ,(A 4% @% * +c '%# '# 5%A

+# @% C% *5 ) '%# %# & %7 %E .>$E

'# 61 =% '4% '# 5%# % '# .\) "0c ) *+

2011: 33. (

5%> 5% 5;% % 64 '%# '# =A + 5%A b J%; 6%

%8 (0 + 5%#&7 5 7 7 '%# 5%S ,A# ^% *2%I

%# 5%# 8 '0 F(A- C ). 6 % 2 5# $

5& 1 +% + 57/ 3 *'#.

: " '# 4 '% 2.E 5%# A/ +& )& b 7% +%

C% *4% '# @# %Ib 64 *5%# 5%%# 5%# %7 5%% I1 +%

Page 26: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

11

) 5% 6/ =% &% + ! 7 ! J "

)* 42001 :10.(

P% 5 #& 5%I P # 4%#& $ 5 b J%; 6%

28 *'B 54 + A '# '# 1 J)1 %A &h 5I

5#.

: 5%# 5%%# 5%# ,A % +% b 7% +%

6$ 5a 0 2 2.h + . '1 *40 (0 + 5% 5%# I%

4 AA0 5 5% 5A1 5 '% * 6$ % - 4b %

5% )% .I %) "*F%42011 .(

#& 2% 5 5%I 5# 5#A 4%#& $ 5 b J%; 6%

8 *'4%# B 54 + A '# ,A P% 5 &h 5I 2

5# 5%I J)1 %A.

:

2#I '1 3 5 \ :

1] :$ ! 5 P 5%I 5 2% .

2] :2A 3 5 (0 $7 I + ' 2013 /2014.

3] :P # 5%I 5 2% 4#A.

Page 27: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

12

:

'% + D; 3 #& % 5 b%:

- 4I 48$ 5 1 . - 5- 5% =$ 5%&" W. - & 2 ! #& D; 3 '% 5#I 2 5 5% .

Page 28: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

13

'.>

+ <#

Page 29: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

14

'.>

+ <#

+"% $7 J( + ,/ * B 2 *5 @ #& \ :

/0) :+ :

% '% '47 '# *A *1 + '# ,A *% % b%

^%" @ :

>

B A *;4 b ,%1 P% 5I% '#

5%# 5%%# .b% '# A % #& 7% %#& '%# *'# A% '#

#% @% *5%7 % 7% % *#% +% J8 #& 0 2 '%

2.E 5( %%># %A '%.

'8 1 5% ?$0- 6% '# *A %I + *27%

2% 27#0 4 4 '47 +% 58 *6$ $0- 1 %$7 ) .

+ . @ +% 3 *27% %b #& 5%1 I F + '#

5%## 5%%# *5%# 5$0 + 2 % 5 2#

,$% 5AE * % % % # 4 % F + '# '# *A

Page 30: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

15

A% P/ & ! @# 5 *2# + %0- 6%B

7 2##) *+%2007.(

1 ) +0c) 2011 :33 ( $ +1 '# A " : 5%A '#

'%# +c * @% 4% 5#A 5Ab 5& ^ '4 .>$E %E %7

& %# '%# ) *5 C% @% +# .\ '# %

5%# '# 4%' =% 61 '#. "

& 1) 2007 :65 (b " : @ '# % ,A @% 68

%# 5%#&7 *A + (0 '% + C ).8 5 *% @ 2 6

'# 4%. "

& ) 2011:13 (b " : 2% & 5#A #& +1 #% I1 +

'4& *)" 1 9& % '# 5#A# .,(A +% 2%#& 5&

I :*6- *.$- '# * @ 24 5%#& )%& I : %7 *8

%7 = * 24 %#5 5%/ I :*5B( *%7 *:-

*S @ 24 ). *)8 *?%0# *F- %a + 24 4A

!8 % + 2 . "

W% d%) 2010 :4 (1 " : 5%A P% @ +%# & .%1 '7

#& 7% % #% '4E 2# 24 J%8 5%8(01 47%B '4%."

Page 31: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

16

&) * 42001 :120 (b " :2. 4% '# 0 5& '# A%A0

= *4 41 2%% + 2%%- 54 '# *B7 + %

/ ) 5% 5% '## %a 5A / 5 * 4B7% +

(0 F- 1 , * 1 2%% '# *A A% +1 + /

) 5% 5% '## 5A / 5 * + 4% '# *7 + %

2" 5% 4 +& =%A 5 &7 7$ 2&

5B + (0 5A1 5%%# 54 #& 28 5%7$.

&) # *1999 :98 (1 " :@ '# @% % '# 5 5

5%#& '# + (0 %8 ). C F(A- 5A/ 5%7$

5%7$( +% % '# J4 J 5%# '#.

6 5I '# A b : '# F% % '# 2%%- 50

.IE 5;% 5% % =% 6/ 5% ) #& 6(0 4& :

4%* C% +% 4% '# J J%%; + (0 P% + 5A1 *57#0

?7 '# @# 2&" A 5 5#&7 4%A % 5%#.

2)

% '# A 3 J1 6% '# *%$/ % 1 2-

5I% *+\ C% 64% =% $81 +% +1 $% % '# , +

, *5%# *5%7 *5%&- 5%) * 2011.(

Page 32: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

17

% '# A + I1 A1 '# *5I C% ^%% '# A +%## 5$

)% 5# &7 *2%"% +% % A *5%% '4h . 1

. 1 % / 5# 5%"% '4#&7 ! 5;% 5A% '4) 1 5% &*5

2007 .(

1 +) 2002 ( +1 + D; 5%%E '## A #%:

] . I '# W '#.

] )% &7 0 6$.

] %A 2 5%% ) 5%%#.

] 5% 24 %7 %#.

] )% ' 5#A '4.

] )% %$ 5#A.

] , 24 '# A 24 5%%.

1 +0c 7%) Scheyvens et. al.,2008 ( +1 '# A + b

=% 2%%E 5%\:

] $% +# + (0 '# A # 2 '& 2(# '4/ A%+

+% 6 )%.

Page 33: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

18

] $% +# (0 '# A #& 2% '44 6# )%.

] +% '# A +%# + A 5%#&.

] % '# '4 7 (0 '# A 1 @% *4% + 2 5%8 1 + 54

% ?0 0c.

+ W0/ 6 . 5%1 '# *A +1 5 5A *'#

+1 '# A ,#A% J4 J% + *5#A % '4 ; 2 21 & #&

=%A #7 '## *%7 %>% + '4 *'# + 5A/ (0 )%I %

4%#& F + *'# # + 5A/ 5%# 5%# I .>$E *# 01 +%

2B( 5#%A 28 *5$ %I% '4% '## P>- 4% . + '# A

_%" _4 *,A# 4 @ 5 *'## C% 3&% #& %0 2 5#;/ +

2% 57 *5$ & +% +%# + = *5% '% '4

)& ^$ E 28 , . I% '# A n + ,A '#

- 5%## 5 *%7 '% +& # 5 '4A1 5%%

)*12011(

% '# A #& % #& *'# 3& 5%# *5%

.> # + (0 2;% 5%%# & F7 W 5 +%#

I1 + *F- %4 . A *5# + b +1 +% )8 '#

#& * 5"E % * +/ '# A ,#A% + +%# '0 24

Page 34: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

19

%7 %# *%# ,% *'% '4 5A1 5& ). 5

*58 J(" +& '- % %% )& +%# 6 2- '%

)Mckinney, 2001.(

(2)

I '1 61 '# A \) *+% 2007: (

] !% 5#A #& , 24 %7 *8 ). 8).

] !% 5A/ 5%# 5;( 5#A# =% 6/ 5% ).

] '& 5I P7 W +%# +%% *5 '4& #& 6 %" 54.

] !% 5#A #& <A 5#I/ *57#0 2(.

] % 5%7% '# 5#A # 5% 57#0.

] P%8 )8 5#A #& . / )% 4%B.

] +% 5#A + , 24 + &7 $ ! +%0\.

] )% &/ 5%&E 5& W 5#A.

] , 5#A 6# 24 2- ,a 4%* 20 5%% 5%%

.

] !% 5#A #& , 24 %7 %# %# ,% '%.

Page 35: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

20

] )& #& %%> )$ '# #& 1 $ % 5#.

61 '# A . *'# C% +% %#&5

*'# 6% !%A% '# , '# P1 *'# , 5 *24 %%>

2- + +1 % '# '# .3 6/ '## A % +& '#

* %# 2&1 5%## 5%%# 5%# 4 *4% '- '#) *%2008.(

21 .S) 2007 ( +1 '# A % #& '# % J I1

JA 58 *5%7$ 1 % #& !8 '# (0 5%#& *'# F +

'# ^% ,A = *%0- !8% % + ) o5% C% % '# ,

*'## J- + +1 +% J(8 5# . + 58( +% '# ,A 5% o

+ (0 4 J 5%; *'# ! %b #& 5%1 < ,A# +b %

J8 + '%B A" , # 5%$0 .

' '# A *'# J1 ) *4%S% + 1 $ #& D;

20 5%% .+ @# / 54 '## '# A \ )*% 2005:(

] !% 5#A '4& #& *'# % + +% 5A/ 5%# 5%7 5%&.

] % #& %" 5$0 2%8(0b '# *'%# 5B #& 5% 5%

5%#& '#.

Page 36: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

21

] ,% 5#A #& '# *A ! <A 2% *'4%#& 5;%4 5;% 5%# 5A% '4

#& 4;I J.

] '%8 ,A C =I *2## @ . 5.

] .>$E 5#A# *J% #& *'4I 97 '4 +b / .\

)%I.

] '# P% J4 1 _ *, J"%1 '& % #,A ?0 P.

] '# P% _% 6# 2# *A @ ?0 % #& %

27 + ,A 0\ 1 + 5& 5%(A W01.

] '# P% B7 #& 28( 5%&- 0 ) 5% *, J"%1

C& '& *4 )8 5 (A.

] '# 7 D# 5% # ,(A P% =A 4 A.

– '# ?0 D +A 6" 5#A ';.

– #& 5;%4 5#A '4%a* '# '#.

] %A D4 * - A5# + '# %# '# A.

] ?%$0 28 ?7 q '%7 % 4%#& '# *A '4

2%B '# P/ 5 '# A +% ?;$0 +%#.

Page 37: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

22

] %0 2%%- ,%1 P% 5;( ##' A.

] % $ 5% 5% & #& '# A @ % 28 +

+%;( #%4.

] !% 5#A #& & .%/ %7 5A/ *'47b +1 5#A 2(#

'44 '% ?7 5%# I1 + @# & '% +0c 5% '4&

'4(.

] !% 5#A '7 #& b '4 *'4&1 % +& @ *2# C

'4 +% 6% +7%.

] % ? %0- +%## % =#% 5A/ 5%%#.

] %A 2 %%5 ' #& '47 .c 5#A '4a '4 'A1 5%.

] % [ +\ *'& 5;%4 5;% 5%%# 5%# *5%> % 5#A

20 )%I '## A.

_ #& )% 5% 5#A *'## # J7 J- 5%# 5%%# 5%#.

] !" ,A J; 68 % 4% *)IE @ + I1 5%#& *'#

)I 37 '#.

] + ! .( + # 5% 5A/ 57#0 #& !% '#

A .

Page 38: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

23

W) *%2008 (+1 '# '# A I% \ :

] % '##.

] !"% J ! 5#A # 0 $7.

] F% 5A/ ,%1 P% 68# %# 28 5#A.

] '0% ,%1 5 5%;.

] A% P% 5;% 5#A '40.

] % #& )% 5% 5#A '##.

] &% +% 5% 57#0.

% 21) * 42001 ( +1 '# B 2%% '# A ?0#%

% b% :

] %b #& *'# - #& oP% ! '& '# .

] !% 8 5% *+%# 5;%4 ?7 ^ '4 . 5 )% '4 =%& .

] !% .$- W *+%# !% *'47 '4-S .

] '%& "7 %A W +%# !% 58 +%% +%#.

]+1 ^$% '# 1 $ '#% 4 '# P% $ % .

Page 39: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

24

+ 5%A '# A 5%# 5%%# % '# %>% 5%#& '#

'%# o5% + 1 $ % 2## I1 5%% _ ! '#

A 31 *57#0 ^$b '# & '## A ,4 %A ,% ,A

*%#& ^$1 '# * & #& ) 68 %# )0 *. @ '%

)& ,A #& , 24 27$ 5%% ,a 4%.

= 5%#& '# *A +h '# - 7% 3 '%# '4 *'# - +

% *,A# + @# / 54 ,A# '# A 3 )*#& 2006 (

@ \ :

] 5 5%% 20 *5%# % 5%8 / .\ ! +%0\.

] 4 *,#A ?%$0 28 *'( + 1 2.# 5B ! 7

5.

] ^%" 2 5%E \ 2A + '# 7.

] '47 +b 3 3A 7 1% + *J-1 % ^;$ 28- + +%#

+%4 +%$$0 #& P1 + ) 58$.

] 5I #& < ! 5;% 5%%# 5%# 5A% * 7%B 6#

24 2- 4 68 5%# 5%% )%.

] C +& 5# 7 + $ ).

Page 40: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

25

] @- ! ;( + *& C% % <A 5#;/ 1 =%# #& % 1

<A / .\ )%.

] ) #& 58 ) * 5 '%$ 5;% 5%%# 5%# 5;(.

] J( 1 +" 5& *5 C% $% &7% '&%.

] %7 n 8 5%A *# ) *'# ^%% . 5 %A.

' W% )2009 ( A '# % + J8(A b% A '# ,A +1

*,A 5 5%% #&5%%# 5%# 1 . 68 '# % +%

b% A %#:

]5%#&7 5%%E A %# 68 ,A !% .

]P %7 A%A0 ,A +% .

] '# <A 7% - *) 5% $ ,A '0% ,.

]61 + W % *7 '%% ,A @% .

]5%&" +%0\ '%% @% .

]5 A P7 &- .

]5$0 S ) #& ) .

]! %" 7 & 5B% *! 5I '% @ .

Page 41: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

26

]& ) 0\ 1 ' ! 5& A #.

]58 5 5B( #& ) .

]+%0\ ! 5%%E 5 )% < ! .

] '%% A%A0 #& ) * 0 '%B A%A0 #& ) .

]2( %7 %# # ,#/ F .

1 )* 2011 ( \ I A '# '# 1 +1 :

];% '# '%$ @% .

] $% C% o5 5& +" 1 *J( (0 + '& =%

7%'&% &.

] 2(# 5% J-# '% C% o4 2( %# %7 P%

)% 4.

]%& *'# ) *# 5%A J%% J%#b J%7 7% .

] 5%#&7 4 $% *4% $% *5 $ +& C% ).7.

]%& *'# A )8 5% 5#;1 <A% d8% % .

# $& + %>% ,A 5%%# 5%# A '# 5%A +

5%#& % *% '4 $ *'# '%# ?0 2## #

Page 42: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

27

'# ,A *5%%# 5%% D A%A0 ' @ ,A# 5 5%#&

'## J8 _ I1 ,A ^$1 *5%#& I1 ^$% , #& P% 8

5%#& I1 % C '4 %> ,A W %$.

/ : <#:

2#A 5I #& & + 2 5% 5%/ 2 5#$ *4I + + 41

'8 ,%) 1996 (+ 5 2 6 +& W 5%#& =;A 5%#&7) '#

A(* 6$ * *58 %I / 5A ,A# %Ib %$

5#A 6$ I &E ) 5% 5%(E = .=% @ *64 ' &

21 C 5 + 0 #%$ *&" 5 5 .c +%#

=;A *5%%# 5 W01 5 .c +%# =;A &75%# .2#$ 5

D; + 41 =7 5#A 5& 5%% 2 =;A 5%#&7 - %

/ 5A ,A# #& 5& 5A" 2 5%A 5%%# .

W1 د-+ (Todd,1999) * '%# D A '# 5 64

28 '0 I1 $ 5%%# 2t 5#&7 ' +%# 5

5 +% . 5# 2 B 24 + A '# 0 5 1

2" .h 5$0 2 o5% 67$ '# $- P%

o '%# D P% )II 2& 4 *)%>$ 2& $$0

5# 5% 28 48(& *P% =A & '# '47 )E !

'%# 6 )E o'%# . '%7 @ 5 2$ =%A 5%#

Page 43: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

28

5# 2 5 (0 + * '%# D A '#

40 . A '# . 5%%; =A P0 5 2"& 8) *5

2& *5% ,%/ *,(A 8 + 54 '# 2& 5; 2&

5 5 #& .( 5 5 +& J% C '8 * A '# 5% %

! 2( 2%1 C% * '%## 5% 5S '# + F 20-)26 (

,(A #& 2 !% W01 2( . ! *J$0 J 2B( 01

=A A '# '4%# ' . 5#A 2 9& ' +

4% / . / 5 +% A 2(b +1 D; 2#$

7 A '# 5%% =%A < ,A '# + 5%% 1 + 4% *5

'# ,A +.

5 2 @#%)Wilk,2003 ( ل-:; + A '# 2%% 5%#& .$

5% 6;B '#& 5 5#A 1 %7 %$ #& 5 )1 ,

+%$$0 %> . + 2%> 2 8 2& % '%$ (0

5/)141 ( 5%% 2& P% ' o 5%> P 5 5A JA

5I =A '0 5A" 2& P% ' +% *A '# : '0

5%%# . '# 2%% 5%#& '%% '#& W u v0 5#A #& =jA A

2 P% *5#A / )7 2%%E 5 *6;B . D; 2"1 8

*4% 2 5%#& 2 *W I1 5 2 5%% 2& +1 %#

*5%% 2& 5#A + I1 '# #& 5#A %7 = @ +% ' +%

Page 44: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

29

A . 5%% 2 "& 8 *+%& # 5#A +1 2- P% ^"1 8

A '# .

+0c 7% '8 ) Scheyvens et. al.,2008 ( 2%% 6%B I1 $ 5

A '# @ '# %7 2%%- 3 5%1 *5%> P%

4% +%4% 5%%# P% =;A 5 *%# 68 +%# #& '#

% 5#&7 5# +%## 5$7 ^%% - *%# 68 . D; 21 8 #& 5

%7% &- 9 *5%> C P% A '# 2%% 6%B 5%1

W +% +1 ,#A 4/ *5%%# 68 + %I A '# 2%% %7 5$

% 5%a =%A +1 *%# 68 W 5 5 5#A ,#A% A '# 2%

. #& 5#A +%# 8 + _% J4 *J4 J.

5% 1 5 2 )2009 ( q ' +%# 5 5 +& 6

A '#C P% 5 P 4%# B 54 + 5%&- 2

+/ 5% C> . P 5%&- 2 # + 5 ! +

'& X '4% 5% C> 5)121 ( 5# J# . 2># 5 5%& 1)70 (

5# J# .2% ! )1 5- '0 ' . 5 D; 24B1 8:

] )/ #& A '# q '4 5 5%&- 2 # % A +1

P 1 +I(I *J 5%& 5 P q 5I(I 2 C% *5%& 5 + 5%#

5"70 5 P% 1 * 5A 5 +% +c *5%& 5.

Page 45: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

30

] # 2% 2A +% 5%;$ 5- 2 = C 5%&- 2

P %> W * A '# q '4 5) I1 ( CE ^$.

] 2 C # 2% 2A +% 5%;$ 5- 2 = '&

5 5%&- )0 2 %> W * A '# q '4 ) P0 + 81

2 & + I1 * 2 & 2 P0 + *2.(

=A )2010( 2 5 A '## ,%1 5I(I '0 I1 6

*5%(E 5% P%) ) * 6$ +%- 2 5$ * ( %$

A ! 6$ ,(A W &E %7 . P !1 #& 5 5%& 2$8

2% 5 5%%# 5%7 5A +%# P . 5 +%1 '0 ' :

0- *#%$ E %7# P 0 &. 2 = +& D; 27

5%;$ 5-)0.05 ≤ α ( 5% ) ! 6$ ,(A %$ 2A +%

*&- '%7 W 2% 5 5%(E =A A '# ,#/ W) 6$

+%- 2 5$ *) * (A 5 '0 A '# ^$ 5%%&- 5%

C(I 2%%-.

5 2 )2010 ( # , < % D 5%#& 5

2%"% '4(A 2 %$ #& A '# 24 9 2%"% . 2A

+%%& #& 5 :% '%# 5% , 5%;- 5# 2%"% # + / 5

'& X# *7$)12 ( A '# J%% J '4 '8 J#. # '4;1 P%8 '

# ,(A +& )& 5%I 5% *A '# 24 ./ P% 5A +%

Page 46: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

31

'& X# 8 *;- P0 6$ ,(A + % D " +%)273 ( *JA

3- P% #%$ 0 5A '4;1 P%8 ' *A '# '4% '

5%\ D; 5 2#$ 8 *% %#8 2%"% :

]- 2 = ./ P% #& 2%"% # .1 A +% 5%;$ 5

=%A ^$ 3 *< % D# '4" 8 A '# 24.

] 6$ ,(A 2 A +% 5%;$ 5- 2 = ./ ;- P0

0( # =%A ^$ #%$.

W1 )2011 ( 5%/ 5# # B 24 6 1 + 5

' B A '## '4 *5% C> 5 P 4# %

P# . + 5 5%& 2)75 (5# J# . + 5 5 5 20

)30 () . 5# # B 24 5%;$ 5- 2 = D; 24B1

'& ! *C- 2# ^$ 5% C> 5 P 4# % 5%/

+%# B 24 5%;$ 5- 2 = *A '## '4

4% +% 67$ *)0 2 & 5B # S %> . @

'# +4 CE 2# B 24 5%;$ 5- 2 = '&

2 & 5B # S %> *A +% # 67$ *)0

4%.

1 5 2 )2012 ( 5%#&7 5% A '# 2%% I1 $

C> 5 5 5% '# 5%# '4 %/ %$ 5#A 5% . 8

Page 47: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

32

+ 5 5%& 2)59 ( A 5% '# 5%# + 5%I 5 + '%0 ' 5A

5 /6$ '# ?$0 . ) #%$ 0 5% 5%#&7 P% '0 '

E . 2 A +% 5%;$ 5- 2 = 5 2#$ 8

7 P% #& +%# 5#A 5& ^$ #%$ 0 A '# ./ 5% 5%#&

5%%.

<# - % <:

+% ?%0# 5%#& ,% #& 2 5 A 5%\:

] 2 9 2 5 I A '## ) 2%% I1 $ ,%

)1996(* 5 $&) 2002(* 5 @#% )Wilk,2003(، 5)2010( *

1 5)2012 .( % D 5%#& 5 W0/ 2 9 2

5 I A '# 24 9 +%# , #& <)2010 .( 2

W01 5& +P% A '# q 5 5 +& 6 2 I

5 5% 1)2009( '# 5 5 6 2 5% 5 1 *

5%I 5# # B 54 + 2%> 9 ." A '# ,A

2% 5 4#A.

] + 5% 5 5%& 2 % *+%# 1 5#A + 5 2 9 5%& 2

J 5#A +%#.

Page 48: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

33

] 3I1 $ *A '# =%A % D4 5 2 9 20

7$ D4 '0 4" *5#A ?0 ) 2%> $ q 5 5

A '# . +%# + !8 6$ 7$ D4 20 5% 5 1

4% 58( A '# 5#A.

] A '# 2%% '0- %E I/ +& 5 2 D; 9 27

1 4" *P%5 5%& 5 P% A '# q 5 I

5% 1)2009.( +& ; 27 0\ 9 , #& < % D 5%#&

5 I A '# 24 9 +%#)2010.(

] )% 5 5% 5 + 2% 5)5I '#& #& ( 2

+ '# ,A '# *A B & + *2%> + 54 B #

5# 5%I 4#A.

Page 49: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

34

@ '.>

;: ;<

Page 50: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

35

@ '.>

;: ;<

$7 *2/ *5% *! *5 5%4 + J7$

\ #& @ *50 5%;$E 5 *2%>:

8:

7$ D4 '0 ' 5 3 9a/ *.

A:

+ ! 5 + +%; :/ 5; +%# P 5%I 2%

' (02013 /2014* 5%I 5; 5#A 5# *5%I X# +#

P 5%I 2%) 12819 (J# *J5# +%& #& =A 5%%# *2

+% X# & 5#A) 68383 (AJ ' (0 J5A2013 /2014* +%& #&

=A 5%%# 2.

% :

' %0 5%& *5%& C% !8 %0- *5$ 5A #& # & X# P 5$ 5A 5%I)2295( J# J5# .!8) 1094 (J# )1201 (*J5# +%& #&) 25 (5 *5%I C% X# & P +%) 12 (*5 & P CE) 13 (5 .5#A & X# P 5$ 5A 5%I)11081 (JA *J5A !8) 5925 (*JA )5156 (J5A . %0 ')95 ( *J#)105 ( J5#

Page 51: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

36

!8 5%; 5%A)8 ( *5$ 5A +% 5 + +%#)8 ( + 2#5$ 5A C 5 . %0 ')192 ( *JA)208 ( *5%; 5%A J5A

!8)16 ( * 5$ 5A +% 5 + JA)16 (5A C 5 + *5$ 5A) 1 () 2 (+%%\ +"% F 1 5%& 5 :

')1(

% ) CH

%>

5B3 ات-D 68

-ات10 -6D 100

11 FGآB3 D 32

-ات اF"Jة DKL3 ار

200 اNON-ع

21 0#-مد

Q0 119-رL-س

60 دراDت %#

N#ا اRNه

200 اNON-ع

F95 ذآ

G 105 أ

KOا

200 اNON-ع

')2(

# % ) CH

Page 52: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

37

%>

FTا UV133 ا

134 اUV ا,ول اG -ي

133 اUV اG اG -ي

اى ا را

400 اNON-ع

F192 ذآ

G 208 أ

ا

400 اNON-ع

) :

5 61 =% * 5 (0 + 5 %A &h 5I 28

5 I 5 2 B ,/ $&) 2002(، 5)2010( *

1 5)2012 ( 5)2010 .(

5- 5 % 0 2% P% J % '# & % ' : J 5%&

/ 5%& / 5A / 5"70 / J 5"70 . ,% #& 5%\ 2( J%8 I)5 *4 *

3 *2 *1(

) 5;7 A] 1 / (3 = 4 / 3 = 1.33

J \ 2% + 5% 3:

Page 53: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

38

- + 81 2.33970 W

- 2.34 ] 3.67A W

- 3.68 ] 5& W

) 7.:

+ +% + & #& 5%/ 4$ 4" 5 1 =$ + = '

5;% ."&1 5%/ 2 9 P% =A D +%$$0 + P%

=# 'S 5% 5%%)3( *5%># 4( 27 <" + b# @ *

% # 4; . 9a/ +%/ 5.( 2 . '4 ,#A

5 . ." %#& =7 0/ ' *2 @#)80 (% F:Gأو أآ )/ +

,#A % . =# *5%;4 4$ 5 1 :0 ' @ #& J.

)1( *A '# '# 5 =#)2( '# ,A 5

A .

# ):

28 5I +%%A +%- 2I + =:

-+ <:0- )& 0- 5%A )test–retest :( =%A =%A +& @

& +%# + 5 5%& :0 + 5%& #& +%-)30 ( *J5# J#)30 (

A JA*5/ ) + +%&1 '4%#& =%A )& 'I A '0 'I

Page 54: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

39

2I %E +% . A '# '# 5- 5 X# 8).83( *

A '# ,A 5-).84.(

< : 5 '0 "1 [7) "Cronbach’s Alpha( , @ *

#0 =- 2I . A '# '# 5- +).80( ,A 5- *

A '# ).85.(

! :

5%\ 2%> #& 5 2#:

J-1 :\ 5# 2%>:

1]5#A +%## P :+% :

]

] I1

2]+%## )0 :2% 5I(I 4:

]) 58b 2 (

]) +6]102(

]) 11I 5 (

3] +%## # S :+% :

Page 55: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

40

]) P%(

]) = %(

4] 5#A# W :2% 5I(I :

] 6$

] I / 6$

] I I 6$

J%I : \ *5 2%>:

] A '# '# .

]A A '# ,.

=.:

] I / +%S +& 5x ! CI 5% 2A '0 ' *

5 5%% 2- .

]+% A '0 ' *P0 S +& 5x .

] *! P +%S +& 5x 0- '0 ' ;) 2 ( +%% *+%#

%# +% /) One Way ANOVA.(

Page 56: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

41

&

28 5I 2.E 5%\:

J % ! 5 5%.

] . 1 *5 b + 48$ 4I =A 5%;$E 5;( .

] =%A +%- #& 5%& 5.

] ! 2% $ 5$0 .

] %# 2% J%;$ '0 5 5%;$E '## 5%&- SPSS .

] ?(0 D; 48 .

] '% 2%$ 2.

Page 57: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

42

'.> A#

8=

Page 58: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

43

'.> A#

8=

+"% $7 J"& D;# 2#$ 4% 3 5 + (0 5E +&

*4#;1 #& \:

'D '+ :

K $

, 5%% 2- 5% 2A , ' *S +& 5(

5 5 5 5%I 5# # B 54 + A '# '#

2% *5- 2 + ) *)3 (@ ^"%:

')3(

# 0

$ /H #

, 9<>

#

(0

#

15 /. /# /> < (. 3.08 1.56 1

16 >. =+ M '# - % A

#.

2.98 1.53 2

14 %# ,B% * H . 2.96 1.55 3

Page 59: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

44

17 # > 7> %) N < <

%0 >(.

2.96 1.58 3

19 O $> -. 2.88 1.56 5

18 6 % ) # ) C %. 2.87 1.55 6

13

' 6 7 5 C :

) N9$ N' N N %> M

2* (.. (

2.81 1.54 7

10 '= 5 C– .

.

2.77 1.40 8

12 H /2 <# . 2.72 1.54 9

33 > % # 4 '

1 .

2.72 1.51 9

34 %) 1 > *! <. 2.72 1.52 9

38 A - % $ $> ) ' $

$ <.(

2.71 1.51 12

6 6 % ) .. 2.68 1.41 13

11 . 5 C. 2.67 1.46 14

24 - % #5 1 7# -& Q

Q # ,B% * 9 O5) (,.

2.60 1.54 15

54 # /<< /% $ + -. 2.58 1.57 16

32 @+ 5 6 /B5 =#

# #.

2.57 1.41 17

35 & ) # R S# <

> 5 A ..

2.57 1.49 17

52 ' '$# , 9S# . 2.56 1.47 19

28 #& % .5. 2.54 1.45 20

Page 60: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

45

20 #% C >S# 6 ' -& -

O 7*.

2.53 1.52 21

27 6 % 'B5 < =# '. 2.53 1.51 22

7 . 5 T. 2.52 1.37 23

9 HB '= 5 T. 2.50 1.40 24

25 > >.B + C. 2.49 1.48 25

29 @# HH ## ( $. 2.46 1.41 26

26 # #$# ( $ @+# # 9., @

.

2.45 1.50 27

36 =+ (, HB HH <. 2.45 1.53 27

44 . HB 7< (2+. 2.45 1.46 27

37 , $> $ - % A

%#:.

2.43 1.51 30

8 # + 5 T. 2.42 1.42 31

30 6 $ ' %. 2.42 1.40 31

5 # '.0 . 2.41 1.36 33

23 6 $ 5. 2.38 1.53 34

42 % - % # ,B% % '5 !

>. 5.

2.37 1.33 35

22 !. / N ') N2$)

2 Q) % << .

2.35 1.41 36

4 O . 2.34 1.33 37

1 $ % #$) T& -& -

6 .

2.33 1.36 38 >5

31 6 < ' %. 2.33 1.44 38 >5

51 * O5+ A

A - %.

2.33 1.40 38 >5

Page 61: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

46

53 # '<B 8 - % '

-& < .

2.32 1.45 41 >5

55 # U / $ + -. 2.32 1.45 41 >5

21 > 5 Q#) < ) 5 C. 2.31 1.48 43 >5

46 4 50 7 +#

.

2.31 1.46 43 >5

39 H # + > %. 2.29 1.38 45 >5

43 45 ( O ' - % B%. 2.26 1.41 46 >5

45 A 2H> - % 'V

> 5.

2.22 1.33 47 >5

3 > 5 =+ M 'B5

)9# <> . (

2.21 1.29 48 >5

47 ' - % 2 #& < - %

> 2 ,.

2.18 1.36 49 >5

2 (,# O <# #5 #

9.

2.17 1.29 50 >5

48 W X % < 6>#. 2.16 1.28 51 >5

50 # 1 (, /= A. 2.14 1.25 52 >5

40 H # + . 2.10 1.38 53 >5

41 A - % < # @# $

# .

2.09 1.28 54 >5

49 $) N 9H - % '

%.

1.96 1.26 55 >5

$ 2.48 0.44

B(% + =) 3 (+1 B 54 + A '# '# 5 5

2% 5 5%I 5# #2 *5A X# A ) 2.48 (

Page 62: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

47

6- %) 0.44(* 2. 2 +% 5A *5"70

2 2A 5% +%) 3.08] 1.96(* 2. 5 / )7) 15 (

? #& \ " :6B% ,I , J7%B J% J%$ "* A ) 3.08 (

6 %) 1.56 (5 *5A 5 5%I 2. )7) 16 ( ?

#& b% " :!% +%# #& <A 5#;/ 5%7$ % '4% "A

)2.98 (6 %) 1.53 (5 *5A 2. 5 8 )%0- )7

)41 ( ? #& \ ": !% '# #& '% C 2## 5# .

5 "A ) 2.09 (6 %) 1.28(* 5 *5"70 2.

5 )%0- )7) 49 ( ? #& b% " : % #& )% 5% +%# *'##

'4# I1 5%#& 5%# 5%%# 5%# "A ) 1.96 (6 %

)1.26 (5 5"70.

'D :

K $

5( +& *S ' , 2A 5% 2- 5%% , 5

5 ,A '# A + 54 B # 5# 5%I 5 *2%

) + 2 *5- ) 4 (\ ^"% @:

Page 63: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

48

')4(

0 #

$ /H #

, 9<>

#

(0

#

16 ( ( 20 #$

(, 9.

3.09 1.50 1

15 $> Y'$# , < NQ Z Q #

2.

3.04 1.57 2

13 , 9& N $ . =#

=B.

2.94 1.48 3

14 ' % N @# '. '%>

%.

2.89 1.56 4

17 $ < Q> O Q<< (2). 2.89 1.58 4

21 T A 5X NX #

.

2.89 1.58 4

19 "# *> % ' Q=BH A

.

2.82 1.58 7

10 (.0 #:# (, . 2.78 1.39 8

12 T0 A Q=BH N% @# # M#

=+.

2.77 1.51 9

18 >. + *> %># $. 2.77 1.55 9

11 @# % Q># . 9. 2.71 1.42 11

6 : V# 1 >$ )# Q* /0). 2.65 1.43 12

7 Z=. '#<. 2.63 1.42 13

Page 64: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

49

9 < Q># Q<# - % ' M# A =#

Q#.

2.63 1.45 13

8 ,0 '#<. 2.61 1.45 15

20 !.: #: $[ 5X. 2.54 1.49 16

5 Z Q : Q '$

>.

2.52 1.35 17

1 $ << + . 2.38 1.34 18

4 4.5 , HB 7< (2+. 2.37 1.34 19

2 < , '# $+ X A 5X. 2.32 1.33 20 >5

3 '*# '5 . 5. 2.26 1.31 21 >5

$ 2.68 0.56

^"% + ) 4 (+1 5 ,A '# A + 54 B # 5#

5%I 5 2% 2 *5A X# A ) 2.68 (6- %

)0.56(* 2. 2 +% 5A *5"70 2 2A

5% +%) 3.09] 2.26(* 2. 5 / )7) 16 ( ? #& \ " :

6%B 6 24 2- 4 68 5%# 5%% )%" * A

) 3.09 (6 %) 1.50 (5 *5A 5 5%I 2. )7

)15 ( ? #& b% " : %7 n 8 5%A *# ^%% . 5

%A " A ) 3.04 (6 %) 1.57 (5 *5A 2.

5 8 )%0- )7) 2 ( ? #& \ " :% 5%8 / .\ !

+%0\ " A ) 2.32 (6 %) 1.33(* 5 *5"70 2.

Page 65: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

50

5 )%0- )7) 3 ( ? #& b% " : 4 ,#A 0 5$ 40

"A ) 2.26 (6 %) 1.31 (5 5"70.

@ 'D: ; ;# ;

K $

5( +& *S ' , 2A 5% 2- 5%% ,

5 5 '# '# A + 54 B 5#A 5# 5%I 5 *2%

) + 2 *5- ) 5 (^"% @:

')5(

0 #

$ # /H #

, 9<>

#

(0

#

17 # > 7> %) N < <

%0 >. (

2.84 1.54 1

18 6 % ) # ) C %. 2.81 1.55 2

16 >. =+ M '# - % A

#.

2.79 1.47 3

15 /. /# /> < (. 2.76 1.55 4

38 A - % $ $> ) ' $

$ <.(

2.76 1.51 5

34 %) 1 > *! <. 2.75 1.51 6

19 O $> -. 2.72 1.53 7

Page 66: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

51

14 %# ,B% * H . 2.70 1.50 8

23 6 $ 5. 2.70 1.58 9

24 - % #5 1 7# -& Q

Q # ,B% * 9 O5) (,.

2.69 1.54 10

42 % - % # ,B% % '5 !

>. 5.

2.69 1.47 11

22 !. / N ') N2$)

2 Q) % << .

2.66 1.50 12

36 =+ (, HB HH <. 2.65 1.52 13

1 $ % #$) T& -& -

6 .

2.64 1.50 14

13

' 6 7 5 C :

) N %> M N9$ N' N

2* (.. (

2.63 1.46 15

33 ' > % # 4

1 .

2.63 1.49 16

10 '= 5 C– .

.

2.61 1.47 17

11 . 5 C. 2.61 1.48 18

28 .5 #& % . 2.61 1.47 19

54 # /<< /% $ + -. 2.61 1.56 20

25 > >.B + C. 2.60 1.50 21

12 H /2 <# . 2.59 1.48 22

26 ( $ @+# # 9., @# #$#

.

2.59 1.49 23

35 & ) # R S# <

> 5 A ..

2.59 1.46 24

44 . HB 7< (2+. 2.59 1.48 25

52

'$# , 9S# '.

2.59 1.48 26

Page 67: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

52

20 #% C >S# 6 ' -& -

O 7*.

2.58 1.50 27

55 # U / $ + -. 2.57 0.40 28

6 6 % ) .. 2.56 1.42 29

30 ' %6 $. 2.56 1.43 30

32 6 /B5 =# @+ 5

# #.

2.54 1.44 31

51 * O5+ A

A - %.

2.54 1.50 32

3 > 5 =+ M 'B5

)9# <> . (

2.53 1.46 33

27 6 % 'B5 < =# '. 2.52 1.48 34

40 H # + . 2.52 1.52 35

48 W X % < 6>#. 2.52 1.47 36

2 (,# O <# #5 #

9.

2.51 1.46 37

9 HB '= 5 T. 2.51 1.45 38

43 45 ( O ' - % B%. 2.51 1.48 39

53 # '<B 8 - % '

-& < .

2.50 1.48 40

8 # + 5 T. 2.49 1.47 41

21 > 5 Q#) < ) 5 C. 2.49 1.45 42

46 4 50 7 +#

.

2.49 1.48 43

45 A 2H> - % 'V

> 5.

2.48 1.42 44

47 ' - % 2 #& < - %

> 2 ,.

2.48 1.50 45

Page 68: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

53

41 A - % < # @# $

# .

2.47 1.46 46

4 O . 2.46 1.44 47

7 . 5 T. 2.45 1.46 48

50 # 1 (, /= A. 2.45 1.42 49

29 @# HH ## ( $. 2.44 1.41 50

5 # '.0 . 2.41 1.42 51

39 H # + > %. 2.39 1.44 52

37 , $> $ - % A

%#:.

2.37 1.49 53

31 6 < ' %. 2.36 1.42 54

49 $) N 9H - % '

%.

2.35 1.47 55

$ 2.57 0.40

B(% + ) 5 (+1 5 '# '# A + 54 B 5#A 5#

5%I 5 2% 2 *5A X# A 5# 5%# )2.57 (

6- %) 0.40(* 2. 2 5 *5A 2

2A 5% +%) 2.84] 2.35(* 2. 5 / )7) 17 ( ? #&

\ " :&% =7 5%7 +% +%#) 2 *5%# 5%7 5% 5%&-" (*

A ) 2.84 (6 %) 1.54( 5 *5A 5 5%I 2.

)7) 18 ( ? #& b% " : &% F A1 '# 5#A# .I1 5%#& P% "

A ) 2.81 (6 %) 1.55 (5 *5A 2. 5 8

)%0- )7) 31 ( ? #& \ " :&% # A P% " A

Page 69: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

54

) 2.36 (6 %) 1.42(* 5 *5A 2. 5 )%0- )7

)49 ( ? #& b% " : % #& )% 5% +%# *'## '4# I1 5%#&

5%# 5%%# 5%# " A ) 2.35 (6 %) 1.47 (5 5A.

A# 'D : ;# ;

K $

5( +& *S ' , 2A 5% 2- 5%% ,

5 5 ,A '# A + 54 B 5#A 5# 5%I 5

*2% ) + 2 *5- ) 6 (^"% @:

')6(

0 #

# $ /H #

, 9<>

#

(0

#

17 $ < Q> O Q<< (2). 2.83 1.54 1

18 >. + *> %># $. 2.80 1.56 2

16 ( ( 0 2 #$

(, 9.

2.78 1.50 3

21 T A 5X NX #

.

2.78 1.50 4

19 "# *> % ' Q=BH A

.

2.76 1.53 5

15 $> Y'$# , < NQ Z Q #

2.

2.75 1.56 6

Page 70: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

55

14 ' % N @# '. '%>

%.

2.74 1.51 7

13 , 9& N $ . =#

=B.

2.71 1.47 8

20 !.: #: $[ 5X. 2.68 1.49 9

1 $ << + . 2.64 1.50 10

11 @# % Q># . 9. 2.63 1.47 11

10 (.0 #:# (, . 2.60 1.47 12

12 T0 A Q=BH N% @# # M#

=+.

2.59 1.49 13

3 '*# '5 . 5. 2.55 1.47 14

6 : V# 1 >$ )# Q* /0). 2.55 1.42 15

2 < , '# $+ X A 5X. 2.52 1.45 16

8 ,0 '#<. 2.49 1.46 17

9 < Q># Q<# - % ' M# A =#

Q#.

2.47 1.43 18

4 4.5 , HB 7< (2+. 2.46 1.43 19

7 Z=. '#<. 2.44 1.46 20

5 Z Q : Q '$

>.

2.41 1.40 21

$ 2.62 0.59

B(% + ) 6 (+1 5 ,A '# A + 54 B 5#A 5#

5%I 5 2% 2 *5A X# A 5# 5%#) 2.62 (6

%) 0.59(* 2. 2 5 *5A 2 2A

Page 71: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

56

5% +%) 2.83] 2.41(* 2. 5 / )7) 17 ( ? #& "5

'%% 7 % W + 61" * A ) 2.83 (6 %

)1.54 (5 *5A 5 5%I 2. )7) 18 ( ? #& " 5

5%#&7 %7 5A/ 5%7$ " A ) 2.80 (6 %) 1.56 (5

*5A 2. 5 8 )%0- )7) 7 ( ? #& " ^;$ + '# "

A ) 2.44 (6 %) 1.46(* 5 *5A 2. 5

)%0- )7) 5 ( ? #& "^%" 5%E A + '#

7 ".A ) 2.41 (6 %) 1.40 (5 5A.

65 'D :'2 ,B% * 0 =.& O; %)0.05 ≤ α ( ;# ;

; ; ;

K $

% A , ' *S +& 5x 5 +% + '# 5

A '# 5 5 A '# ,A * 2% 5 )7 (

D; 3 +%%:

') 7(

# # # '

$

**0.553 " ا!ر ط

! 0.000 ى ا

Page 72: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

57

200 ا" د

**0.592 " ا!ر ط

! # 0.000 ى ا

400 ا" د

**0.569 " ا!ر ط

! 0.000 ى ا # /

600 ا" د

(-ى ** % V;0.01( دال ا(

(-ى*% V;0.05( دال ا(

+ ^"% )7 ( 5 5 +% 5 5%;$ 5- 2 58(&

J 2% 5 A '# ,A 5 5 A '# '#

# *+% A X)0.569 ( 5- W)0.000(*

# / + ^"% *)7 ( +% +% 5 5%;$ 5- 2 58(& J"%1

5 A '# ,A 5 5 A '# '# 5 5

2% +%# B 54 + +% A X# )0.553 ( 5- W)0.000 (

'# '# 5 5 +% +% 5 5%;$ 5- 2 58(& @ *

X# *5#A B 54 + 2% 5 A '# ,A 5 5 A

+% A )0.592 ( 5- W)0.000 ( +% A- '%8 2

%;$ 5.

Page 73: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

58

6 'D : O % =.& 0 * 7 T2 '2)0.05 ≤ α (

K 9#5 '2D 6 ! OH

8 +& 5- 2 *# S *P 2%> 2%;$E ^%" S

\ ) #& *)0:

1. P:

' , 2A 5% 2- 5%% 5 5 '#

'# A %> P *'# ' =%A 0) t]test (4B% ) 8 (@:

') 8(

# 0 # !

N6 #5) t-test(

6 #

(0

,

O

0

$* 95 2.35 0.44 4.137 0.000

-& 105 2.60 0.40

% D; ) 8 ( = 2 5- 5%;$ & W

)0.05≤α (5 5 '# '# A %> P 5 *5%#

J 5%8) 2 (5 2>#) 4.137 (W 5-) 0.000 (C% + =7

^$ C- % F7 +4A 5%.

Page 74: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

59

:ا)ه ا"&%$ .2

' , 2A 5% 2- 5%% 5 5 '# '# A %> S # '##N 4B% ) 9 (@.

') 9(

# 0 #

!N # ! '2D

'2D # (0

# 21 2.59 0.44

6$# 119 2.44 0.43

% 60 2.52 0.44

C 200 2.48 0.44

B(% + ) 9 ( = 5%B +% 2A 5% 5 5

'# '# A J %> S *# $ ,$ 5;) '# (#&

#&1 A X#) 2.59(* . ,$ 5;) 2 %#& (5 5%I A

X#) 2.52(* J%01 . A 5;7) P% ( X#) 2.44 .(

% % 2 =7 +% 2A 2 5- 5%;$ & W 5-

)0.05≤á ( ' =%A %# +% / ) One way ANOVA(* 2. D;

%# +% #& "% \) 10:(

Page 75: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

60

') 10(

7> 0 0 + # ' #

! '2D

# . C

#

# ( ,

O

0

% # .496 2 0.248 1.308 0.273

% '5 37.329 197 0.189

C 37.825 199

+% D; ) 10 ( '& = 2 5- 5%;$ & W

)0.05≤á (5 5 '# '# A %> S *# J

5%8) 6 (5 2>#) 1.308(* W -5) 0.273.(

:ا*$ة&%$ .3

' , 2A 5% 2- 5%% 5 5 '# '# A J %>* %> 9#5N 4B% ) 11 (@ :

') 11(

# 0 #

!N # ! 9#5

9#5 # (0

5 ',V 68 2.54 0.44

Page 76: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

61

6J10 100 2.45 0.44

11 $ 32 2.48 0.41

C 200 2.48 0.44

B(% + ) 11 ( = 5%B +% 2A 5% 5 5

'# '# A J %> )0* $ ,$ 5;) 5 ',V (#&

#&1 A X#) 2.54 .(. ,$ 5;) 11 $ (5 5%I A

X#) 2.48( *. ,$1 5;7) 6J10 (5 0/)% A

)2.45(* % % 2 =7 +% 2A 2 5- 5%;$ & W 5-

)0.05≤á( ' =%A %# +% / ) One way ANOVA(* 2. D; %#

+% #& "% ) 12:(

') 12(

+ # ' 7> 0 0 #

! 9#5

# . C

#

# ( ,

O

0

% # .348 2 0.174 0.916 0.402

% '5 37.476 197 0.190

C 37.825 199

Page 77: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

62

D; ) 12 ( '& = 2 5- 5%;$ & W

)0.05≤á( 5 5 '# '# A %> *)0 J 5%8 6

5 2>#) 0.916(* W 5-) 0.402.(

A# 'D : 0 * 7 T2 '2 O % =.& )0.05 ≤ α (

K O 6 ! OH

W P %> 2%;$- ^%" S +& 5E 2

\ ) #&:

1. P:

' , 2A 5% 2- 5%% 5 5 ,A

A '# %> P *,A ' =%A 0) t-test (4B% ) 13 (@ :

') 13(

# 0 # !

N6 #5) t-test(

6 #

(0

,

O

0

$* 192 2.66 0.63 1.463 0.144

-& 208 2.58 0.55

D; ) 13 (#& '& = 2 5- 5%;$ & W

)0.05≤á( 5 5 ,A '# A %> P 5 5%#.

Page 78: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

63

:اى ا را&%$

' , 2A 5% 2- 5%% 5 5 ,A '# A %> W* 4B% ) 14 (@:

) 14(

# 0 N #

! O

O # (0

0.64 2.54 133 ا/ ا".$

0.49 2.71 134 ا/ ا!ول ا12ي

0.62 2.60 133 ا/ ا12 13ي

C 400 2.62 0.59

(%B + ) 14 ( = 5%B +% 2A 5% 5 5

,A '# A %> W * %> W *

$ , A / 5 &#) ا12ي ا!ول ا/ (;5 $) 2.71(* $

,$ 5;) (. (#& 5 5%I A ) 2.60($ * ,$1

5;) 6$ ( 5II 5 #& A ) 2.54( .% % 2

=7 +% 2A 2 5- 5%;$ & W 5- )0.05≤á( ' =%A %#

+% / ) One Way ANOVA(* 2. D; %# +% #&

"% ) 15:(

Page 79: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

64

') 15(

7> 0 0 + # ' #

! O

# . C

#

# ( ,

O

0

% # 1.899 2 0.950 2.779 0.063

% '5 135.646 397 0.342

C 137.545 399

% D; ) 15 ( '& = 2 5- 5%;$ & W

)0.05≤á( 5 5 ,A '# A %> W * J

5%8 6 5 2>#) 2.779(* W 5-) 0.063.(

Page 80: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

65

'.> 65

, 8= .

Page 81: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

66

'.> 65

, 8= .

+" $7 58 D; 2#$ 4% 5 5% 2%$

*4A #& \:

'D '+ :

K $

21 D; +1 5# # B 54 + A '# '# 5 5

2% 5 5%I2 *5A X# A 5# 5%#) 2.48 (6

%) 0.44.(

8 % , *@ 6" @ +%# 5%/ '# *A %#& W

5%%# 5%# 2%%E + % =% . + =# J"%1 @ , % 8

%%> C + J0 %%># +%# 5% + #% *A '# %# '%# +

5A/ 28 %7 #& % @ # W 5#A '#% - +1

5" *'# I 5%" _.&1 A '# #g% +1 + J0 1 *5&

% . 4# 5#8 %%> 5a 6" , % 8

, % '% 6" 1 *%%>.

'# #& ,$ + % *5%7$ 5$ ) $8 J"%1 5% 3 W 8

J$$0 *^%$ 28 )B 67$ )% 5#A &1 *5%

Page 82: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

67

, 6$ ) 7 *'4%#& )A% + + 60 . '# %

J $7 ) +" W .4 +b J#8.

2/ 9 ? J"%1 5% 3 W 8 %7 5( $ )4/

+%# 5%%# =A #& $% '# % *4(0 4& =% *5A/

5( , 1 5A/ 1 5%%" 5%%# ; + #0 ) )".

@( 6" J"%1 5% 3 W 8 '# A '%## 5( 24# '#

'# 5;% ! , A '# 2%% =%A %0 3&% - *A

4% = 5# .

,% 5 5% ! 5% 3 27 8)1996( 2#$ 4; =7 5#A

5& 5%% 2 =;A 5%#&7 - % / 5A 5 *,A#

)Todd,1999 ( 21 + / 5 +% A 2(b +1 4;

% 1 + 4% *57 A '# 5%% =%A < ,A '# + 5%

'# ,A. 5% 1 5 5% ! 7 28 27#0 )2009 ( 21 4;

)/ #& A '# q '4 5 5%&- 2 # % A +1

J 5%& 5 P q 5I(I 2 C% *5%& 5 + 5%# P 1 +I(I *

5"70 5 P% 1 * 5A 5 +% +c *5%& 5.

Page 83: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

68

'D :

K $

21 D; +1 5 ,A '# A + 54 B # 5#

5%I 5 2% 2 *5A X# A ) 2.68 (6- %

)0.56 .(

*%%> 5a '& *5%%# =A '# #& 5#A 5% 3 W 8

'# 5 6" '# + F ' 5 6" *A . 8

&7 #& J8 #% - *A '# ,%1 '## )0 '& J"%1 W

5%7$ 5> 0 5A 5A/ 5.

+ 50 '% ; J"%1 5% 3 8 #& +%#

5#&7 5 5A/ '- + B7 5#A *5%#%$ 20-

5%7$ 5> 0 .

5 5% ! 5% 3 27 8 )2010( 2#$ 4;

A +% 5%;$ 5- 2 = '# 24 ./ P% #& 2%"% # .1

=%A ^$ 3 *< % D# '4" 8 A. 28 27#0

5% 1 5 5% ! 7)2009 ( 21 4; # % A +1

5 5%&- 2 *5%& 5 + 5%# )/ #& A '# q '4

Page 84: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

69

+c *5%& 5 P 1 +I(I *J 5%& 5 P q 5I(I 2 C%

5"70 5 P% 1 * 5A 5 +%.

@ 'D: #

K $

21 D; +1 5 '# '# A + 54 B 5#A 5# 5%I

5 2% 2 *5A X# A ) 2.57 (6- %) 0.40.(

A P @ , % 8 '4 '& [ % 5# '4 5#

A '# 3 %7 '# 6" 28 +% '4#% .

5#A# 5 6 '# A '# 6" J"%1 5% 3 W 8

*6 3 5%7%B '7% 8 *5%% '4% 3 A 5 6" +%

+ ) .$ 6 '4 '% C% *5%% '4% '# 8 + 20 6

5 )0 ! '4 )% )0 5%% 5%%# 5%# 20 # A%A0.

# '# !% 6" @ 5% 3 W 8 &7 24 , #& 5#A

%" 1 . #& 5#A '# '%7 1 2E +%0\ ! $

4 =7- 1 9 5A.

,% 5 5% ! 5% 3 27 8 )1996 ( 5#A =7 4; 2#$

5& *,A# 5A / % - 5%#&7 =;A 2 5%% ! 5

)2010 ( .1 A +% 5%;$ 5- 2 = 4; 2#$

% D# '4" 8 A '# 24 ./ P% #& 2%"% #

Page 85: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

70

3 *< =%A ^$ . 5% 1 5 5% ! 7 28 27#0

)2009 ( '4 5 5%&- 2 # % A +1 4; 21

5 P q 5I(I 2 C% *5%& 5 + 5%# )/ #& A '# q

*J 5%& 1 * 5A 5 +% +c *5%& 5 P 1 +I(I

5"70 5 P%.

A# 'D : ;# ;

K $

21 D; +1 5 ,A '# A + 54 B 5#A 5#

5%I 5 2% 2 *5A X# A ) 2.62 (6- %

)0.59.(

#& 4 5%%# '% ,%1 +1 5% 3 W 8

,A + % 8 5%#%$ 20- 5%%# ,%/ +1 '4& *A '#

20- 3 "1 D; #& +#$% '4#.

'# '47 A +" ,A 5#A @ 6" J"%1 5% 3

# # $& + %>% +b %# +& 6#0% 1 *A '%#

61 =% ?% - 4 @ *5%%# 5%# ^$% *'#

A '#.

Page 86: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

71

5 5% ! 5% 3 27 8 )Todd,1999 ( +1 4; 21

A '# + / 5 +% A 2(b 5%% =%A < ,

'# ,A + 5%% 1 + 4% *57 A '#* ! 5

)2010 ( # .1 A +% 5%;$ 5- 2 = 4; 2#$

# '4" 8 A '# 24 ./ P% #& 2%"% *< % D

=%A ^$ 3 . 5% 1 5 5% ! 7 28 27#0)2009 (

'# q '4 5 5%&- 2 # % A +1 4; 21

5I(I 2 C% *5%& 5 + 5%# )/ #& A *J 5%& 5 P q

5 P% 1 * 5A 5 +% +c *5%& 5 P 1 +I(I

5"70.

65 'D :'2 ,B% * 0 =.& O; %)0.05 ≤ α ( ;# ;

; ; ;

K $

21 D; '# 5 5 +% 5 5%;$ 5- 2 58(&

J 2% 5 A '# ,A 5 5 A '#

X# *+% A)0.569 ( 5- W)0.000(* J 5#A +%# B 54 +.

5#A #& J J P% '# .1 +1 *5% 3 W 8

,A + A '# 3 '# 5 +1 C% *5% 5%#

*5% 5%## J%%; J 5A/ J ^$% ,A #& P%

Page 87: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

72

*'# 4B% 20%>% + '4 '# + 5A/ (0 )%I

% 4%#& F + '# # + 5A/ 5%# 5%# I .>$E #.

+ W0/ 6 . 3 58( A +% '# ,A +1

'# '# A + b !% 5#A '4& #& *'# % + +% 5A/

5%# 5%7 *5%& 5B #& 5% 5% 5%#& '# + (0 %

[ +\ '& 5#A# ! )& '4a '4 '4% . &%

5#A #& %A 2 5%% 5%#& *'# '&% ! *;( C% %

<A / .\ )% 4 % *,#A5 + '%$ 5;%

5%%# 5%# 5;(.

#& 9% + *@ h +% '## %# .E #

6 2# 5#A# +1 $% .-S 5#A # # + &7 1 5.

% 5 5% ! 5% 3 27 8 ,)1996 ( 5#A =7 4; 2#$

*,A# 5A / % - 5%#&7 =;A 2 5%% 5& ! 5

)Todd,1999 ( / 5 +% A 2(b +1 4; 21

=%A < ,A '# + + 5%% 1 + 4% *57 A '# 5%%

'# ,A .

Page 88: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

73

6 'D : O % =.& 0 * 7 T2 '2)0.05 ≤ α (

K 9#5 '2D 6 ! OH

%7 +%\ )0 # S P 2%> ." D;:

- 6:

21 D; = 2 5- 5%;$ & W) 0.05≤α (5

5 '# '# A J %> P 5 *5%# C% + =7 ^$

CE.

8 % 4B 3 *5% 5a CE %b 2 =% W !7 +

=7 o%/ @ '# 2# %% '4 %A ./ + (0

'0 =A 2%% '# A* %E 5;% 5%%# 5%# ' 'B ?(0E

*5% %+ &1 *5#A *'41 i% '4#%$ .

8 % , 3 5% J"%1 '& )E % + (0 '&

2# #& 8 + 5 *) '% 5%& !%# *+4 C%/

d 8%" 2# o2A / 4g% % 2#A 5;% 5%

5& '## A + 67$# 5%" 2%4.

Page 89: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

74

:ا)ه ا" &%$ -

21 D; '& = 2 5- 5%;$ & W) 0.05≤á (

5 5 '# '# A J %> S #.

+ +% P% 5 #%b '# +1 5% 3 W 8

*) 6/ =% ,#A W 5%7$ 5> 0 #%7 ;1 %A

(0 #& ^" P - %# 2 +1 %'## / ./ 6.

'# % + ) '%# '# $ +1 @ 5% 3 W 8

B 9> ;1 '# +1 5#%7 C# ) 4 5%%" 2

%#& 2 1 P% # #S +&.

% 8 1 *+%## ) 4 5%% 2 J"%1 @ ,

S +& B 9> *5% '40 '44 %A + +%# 4(0 + +%

# '4.

:ا*$ة&%$ -

21 D; '& = 2 5- 5%;$ & W )0.05≤á( 5

5 '# '# A J %> )0 . '# )0 +1 * 5% 3 %7

W #& IS - 3 '# A * @ +1 @ % + 2%A

5;% 5% + 4b '& '# + C% 4 %*P 4 '& )E

% 2#A 2%E 5( + $ '# ; *5%%# '& %/

E * #& & +1 % 5 6 '% $% ! +%# '&

Page 90: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

75

'4;1 3%A * '% 5%> 5 +% W 2 5%# 5% 9>

B +& & 2 )0 '4.

8 W 3 5% +1 +%# + 20 57#0 1 5%1 '# A

" 5%# *5% P% J%% #& 5#$ 5%;4 5%## 5% 5#I

,A '# + + .1 4 ,#A . # % +1 )0

%> %a IS 5 5 '# '# A * @E . *J4 '

6#0% 6(0 2 )0 .-S4 +%# 2# .

1 5 5% ! 5% 3 27 5%)2009 ( 4; 21 =

'4 5 5%&- 2 ) # 2% 2A +% 5%;$ 5- 2

P %> W * A '# q) I1 ( CE ^$ . 2 = '&

# 2% 2A +% 5%;$ 5- q '4 5 5%&- 2 )

)0 2 %> W * A '# ) & 2 P0 + *2 P0 + 81

2 & + I1 * 2.( # 5 5% )2011 ( 4; 21

# B 24 5%;$ 5- 2 = 4# % 5%/ 5#

5%;$ 5- 2 = '& ! *C- 2# ^$ 5% C> 5 P

5B # S %> *A '## '4 +%# B 24

+% 67$ *)0 2 &4% . 5- 2 = '& @

# S %> *A '# +4 CE 2# B 24 5%;$

4% +% # 67$ *)0 2 & 5B.

Page 91: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

76

A# 'D : O % =.& 0 * 7 T2 '2)0.05 ≤ α(

K O 6 ! OH

\ W P %> ." D; 58 ' :

- 6:

21 D; '& = 2 5- 5%;$ & W) 0.05≤á (5

5 ,A '# A J %> P 5 5%#.

% 3 5% +1 ,A - 6#0% 5%# 5% +% *CE

5#A 1 CE '4 6> 5%7$ ! 5%A C !

*'# 9> B J 1 jI .

:اى ا را &%$ -

21 D; '& = 2 5- 5%;$ & W )0.05≤á( 5

5 ,A '# A J %> W .

% 3 5% +1 ,A - 6#0% 5%# 5% 6(0 W

* @ +1 5#A 5# 5%I +% '1 6> 5%7$ ,

#& 6(0 *'47$ +/ ?;$0 5%7 5%; 34 5# - 6#0 6(0

W % '4 54 .

% ! 5% 3 27 5% 1 5 5)2009 ( 4; 21 =

'4 5 5%&- 2 ) # 2% 2A +% 5%;$ 5- 2

Page 92: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

77

P %> W * A '# q) I1 (CE ^$* 2 = '&

2A +% 5%;$ 5- q '4 5 5%&- 2 ) # 2%

)0 2 %> W * A '# ) & 2 P0 + *2 P0 + 81

2 & + I1 * 2(* ! # 5 5%)2011 ( 4; 21

5%;$ 5- 2 = 4# % 5%/ 5# # B 24

5%;$ 5- 2 = '& ! *C- 2# ^$ 5% C> 5 P

5B # S %> *A '## '4 +%# B 24

67$ *)0 2 &4% +% . 5- 2 = '& @

# S %> *A '# +4 CE 2# B 24 5%;$

4% +% # 67$ *)0 2 & 5B.

;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;.:

' ." 5%\ 2%$ 5I ' D; + % $:

- 5% ) '%8 5%% 2 5%I 5# 2# #

A '# ' '&.

- A '# '# '& P% =A 2%% '# % +%".

- % +%4 %7 '# '1 '& 2 +%# 5 +%

A.

- .- '& *A '# ' ^%" 5#A# 5% 2" '%

.

Page 93: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

78

- *A '# ,A '# + 5 5 $ 5#I 2 .

5%/ +%##5A.

Page 94: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

79

A;;;;;;;;;;;;

Page 95: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

80

A

# A:

* 1 ^$)2011 " .(I1 '0 2%% '# A +% %$

# '47 2 5%%/ W 2A 6$ CI /." ; ;

# .i# 38 * =#2.

6% & *5& % *5% 1)2007 .( (>. 6 82

-+.+& :!% # )% .

%P ( ). " 2009 (اO:-اد %": %:-دة 1 %5* A '# q 5 5

B 54 + 5%&- 2 5% C> 5 P 4%#

+/". : @# ,H . I *! # . ?

51] 70 .

$ *& % *& 1)2012 " .( 5% 5%#&7 5% A '# 2%% I1

#A W %/ %$ 5% C> 5 5 5% '# 5%# 5 ." ;

7 . #28 ]/ .

& 4 & *1)2007 ". ( A '# 2%% 9 '0 F 5%#&

5# ,(A W $8- 5 3- %$ #& $8- P%

Page 96: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

81

+& 5A# 5%I ." 6 7 82 . $ * :

P% =A D# 5%$ 5%.

+% *%)2008 .( .+& :)% .

*d% + & A) 2010.( 8# c c - % cc

.5 *) $.

*+ %) 2002 .( H$$ << .' :2 '(&/

=%.

% & *+%)2007 " :(A '# 5%A < " !8 +& J( * :

http://www.aloyun.com

*)).2005 " .( 5% %%) – : –@ ( .$-

24 5% 5% 2%"% A '# ,#1 #& +%;

5%&E 5# ,(A W 2%"% =#8 0 "% %7 ."

% # .+# 5 *CI *& # :#5% 5%.

#& *)2011 " .( P 4# % 5%/ 5# # B 24

P# ' B A '# '4 5% C> 5 ."

N ? */ 3]24.

' 5A &* &)2011 " .(0 I1 CI 6$ ,(A %$ A '# '

4 '4#% 2%"% ) A ."> # @# *

+I(I *+% 5.

Page 97: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

82

) N W *,8& 1 % *5% * *& 2)2011 . ( ;

# #7 . +& : !% # = .

= & ,A *%)2005 .( . !8 +& J(

http://www.moudir.com

1 *+%)2010 " .( P 5 5%# 5% % =%A 2(

+% B 54 + 57 ." N> 6< + *!

I.

5 & * )2010 .( B: # 6 ) B 7#

%;#: 2$> . 2) $ # A (. B.) 5

) %a %(/ *+& *A/ = 5 *+.

* + ) 2011 .( 101 . ; :) 5% '%#.

% " *$&)2001 .(6 7 82 2 . 5

5% 5%# *5%.

$& * " %) 2002 " .(5%#& ,#1 '# A '; #& 5%%

5% P% 2- 2 5% . " # .

5%# 5% # ! * % ? 83] 113.

#& * 5 ) 2006 ":('# A "* J( +& !8 :etn.alyaseer.www://http

Page 98: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

83

'% * )2010 .( =+ 9 % & 5# 7#

'. T* ) $ # A (. ,> # - % 9#

# ! 9#) .) %a % 5( = 5 *

/+/ *+& * A.

*# 1 +% * #& 1) 1999 .( . # 82 7

6. ) : , .

+ + 7 ' & *)2010 .( $: M< #c 8# %

- % "# #B 2 '..

)) %a 3 5A1( 5% 5# *5 5 *W '1 5 *

5%.

*' ^ ) 2009 .( ,A '# A. `% 0 :15 /4 / 2014

http://ebnelsakr.mam9.com

* 4 ') 2001 .(I1 2%% '# A 2& 58 #&

%$ ,%- %7 2- .%%7 W ,(A 6$ /

I . # * # ! * *I %%.

%& ' *F%4)2011 .( # D '>. `% 0 :1/6/2013

http://www.raya.com

Page 99: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

84

1 %4 * 4)2001 .( (. # O c%0 c< "# c

2 9Hd # % ) . ) %a % 5(5 *

*5%(E ،ة() *+,-./.

% *,%)1996 .( %> 7 %) ( NB: # 6

7 # %: (. # - % # ) . % 5

) %a( = *= 5 * .

#+ A :

Felder , R . M . and Brent, R . (1997) . Effective teaching workshop . North

Carolina State University Press .

Mathews, L.k. 2006. Elements of active learning. Look at:

http://www.2 una.edu/geography/active/eleemtsn.htm.

Mckinney, P. (2001). Active Learning. at: www.cat/edu/teachingtips.

Prince, M. (2004) .Does active learning work ? Review of the research.

Journal of Engineering Education. 93 (3), PP.223-231.

Scheyvens, R.;Griffin, A.;Jocoy, C.; Liu, Y.;Bradford, M, (2008). Experimenting

with active learning in geography: Dispelling the myths that

perpetuate resistance . Journal of Geography in Higher Science

Teaching, Vol. (29). (1) pp.1723.

Todd, F.(1999). "Degrees of freedom : a study of collaborative learning in

higher education" . DAI . 89205.

Page 100: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

85

Wilke, R. (2003).The effect of active learning on student characteristics in a

human physiology course for none majors. Advances in Physiology

Education. 27, 207-223.

Page 101: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

86

7;;;;;;B

7 )1(

#

Page 102: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

87

ا$8%4 ا$78 ا6 45

;+ 7; ;;

# $

6 7 82 ,

:ا: ا"4 98$ة

'( '%#& 5 :

' 5I .h 5 + : "

"# N ! #

$"* b 2#A $ #& 5 % D =A

P% 5 = A/ +/ . ' 5E +& 2

5- )A0 54 + 1 :0 5 W *,#A J5% "7

%0 5E 4 5 *) J#& +b 2% 4

5% *5 + '0 W 9a/ C *# ! ' #&

+ '.

وا ?$ ا!8$ام =>; 5ل و 9ا

ا28

ل اي

2014

4" :ا&%$ات ا ?@$ا=%

Page 103: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

88

258b : ات ا*$ة = ا ر?

-ات) 10 - 6( & D

) 11 (FGآB3 D

د0#-م :ا)ه ا"

Q0-رL-س

%#& 2

ذآF :ا

I1

Page 104: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

89

= ا"4 اBC ا1 دور ا"4

ــ4ـــ

Eــ$

ا

اــ$ات

%

/ % >5

>5

/

% F5دوار ا BC"4 اا ;%G لHI 4"م ا?:

1. L+ 3 &N#Nا & &QN د% F"اك أآFTإ إ )L .ا)ت ا#N #روس

ا#N0 N-اU اN#N& ى ا(0FL $0[ اF"Jات .2

.اLOة

3. N#Nدا3 ا FG)L ^#JNا #_D,ح اFa لb. & &.

4. &N#Nرات اون ى ا NL.

5. &N#Nل 0& اV+dرات ا NL.

6. KL3 ار %- e أ fNVL.

7. L f#در اV 3 ا.ر &N#Nك اFe.

8. L "DNا e ,3 ا.ر ا &N#Nك اFe.

9. Lزbا N#ا D-3 ا.ر ا &N#Nك اFe .

10. N#ا D-ام اJDع 3 ا-L– درVو N#ا f#ا.

11. f#در اV امJDع 3 ا-L.

12. LFi .L- ا"$ت اN# اهL N-ازي اO-ا j ا

Page 105: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

90

ــ4ـــ

Eــ$

ا

اــ$ات

%

/ % >5

>5

/

13. FDق واFa امJDع 3 ا-L G KLت ارO+ا :، واNآة، واF)Nح ا^%#، (GNاور، وا j

) .واUV اlه

14. ONت ا%-m-N0 b% رات ا ذاتLز fiL.

15. L n L-0F+ ^o-+ اب وا$ب-Gا Uo-.

16. N3 ^Vا #_D,ح اFa دل"+ #% &N#Nا qOeLf0.

17. &N#N0& ا LدF^وق اF^ا% اFL.

18. KLار #N% ءrأ "## f#ط اN ع أ- .FLا% +

19. &N#Nا# ى ا FQ^رات ا FL- )L.

L( إ ) اروس mt0 N^ء -ع & ا0% .20 .واlوق اN# NO-ى

21. -L ^#JNا "Dوأ fL-$ام أدوات اJDع 3 ا.

22. uVL ا( ،&N#N# & .أQ3رهf اDب أ)

--) ا#J)L 3 fم .23Q+ & Lاروس ا.

24. (-L &N#Nإ ا v"+ w-N#+ #% اتF". &Uى -اF.ة أL( ذات b% N0 f+ N#+ .

-ع .25L 3 e ,ا &N#Nا +^ ا ^nbا.

26. U#QL &N#N0 اQ0 0,;اث "+F تDودرا FLر$+

LرOا .

27. OL _0 aاF$NLد f#ا #N% لb. KLار.

28. %)L 3 FL-+ f3 0OLإ VJe f#Nا.

Page 106: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

91

ــ4ـــ

Eــ$

ا

اــ$ات

%

/ % >5

>5

/

29. U#QL &N#N0-ا)"ت ا اy"رات از + .

.ارKL 3 ا(Q--) ا(#( FLا% .30

$ ا(#( FLا% .31N3 ا KLار.

#روس .b اN# ا"_ 3 اOرL ا,;اث J)Lم .32

0 "+FNا.

33. LF3- &N#N# صF3 F"ا N% 3 fD-^ ل-;

w-N#+.

.+wO أ%NN#N# f& ا^-رL اFا) اL Llu$م .34

35. & 3mإ e اد وأ-N0 DرNج اNاء اFrt0 م-$L^#J q(اFدر وV.

36. &N#N# ا,دا Uا-N# زمbا Lم ا$L.

37. qOeL اN#N& %# اآ(ب رات ا^FQ ا .وا*0ا%

38. qOeL #% رات اآ(ب FQ^ا# ا) آ#jآFوا fL-$وا.(

.واNO% ا^FدL ا#N ا, L &0 e-ازن .39

.واN# اLFi ا#N ا, L &0 e-ازن .40

41. qOeL f#N0ور ا$م %# ا y;"ت ا-#N# رآeN# 3 0ء 3FNا.

42. %)L &N#Nء %# ا .ا)b% %Nت 0

43. |JeL &aا- Uى ا &N#Nا N# #% (b%.

Page 107: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

92

ــ4ـــ

Eــ$

ا

اــ$ات

%

/ % >5

>5

/

44. F3-L درVNا N#ز اbا v$ ا,هاف.

45. qOeL &N#Nا fه^Lو #% B3 ا f+DرN N#ا ^#JNا.

46. F3-L صF3 ر.dا N#&N# N3 v#L e ,0 N#ا.

47. NL #% FL-+ هتO+0 اOLإ &N#N# م-$+ #% f^+ f+Nاه f+راو.

48. F3-L خNا& ا-دي ا f%واا $G# K^0.

49. Lf## &N#Nدة دا3 اLز #% N.

50. L U3 -ا Nدا f#Nا qL 0ي 3 wFe.

51. Lون q N# اد-Nا Dى اراF.,ا &Llن ا-#NL #% qOe+ f#ا ]e .ا

3ل .52Qe0 '-دارة اt0 fL.

53. Dارا Nا FL-+ #% NL.

.L( ,ن QL-ن دا%f# $$; N ا#" .54

. TFا ##" L( ,ن QL-ن -) .55

Page 108: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

93

7 )2 (

#

ا$8%4 ا$78 ا6 45

;;;;;;+ 7;;;;;;; ;;

;;;;;#;;;;; ;;;;;;; ;;;; ;$

6 7 82 ,

:اM$?4 اGK?K Lي

'( '%#& 5 :

' 5I .h 5 + : "

"# N ! #

$"* b 2#A $ #& 5 % D =A P% . ' 5E +& 2 3 5- )A0 54 + 1 :0 5 W *,#A J5% "7 %0 5E 4 5 ) + 27 *+% J#& +b 2% 4 5% *5 + '0 W 9a/ C *# ! ' #& +

'.

وا ?$ ا!8$ام =>; 5ل و 9ا

ا28

اي ل

Page 109: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

94

2014

LG :ا&%$ات ا ?@$ا=%

ذآF :ا

I1

اUV اFT : اى ا را

اUV ا,ول اG -ي

اUV اG اG -ي

Page 110: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

95

LGدور ا = ا"4 اBC ا1

ــ4ـــ

Eــ$

ا

اــ$ات

%

/ % >5

>5

/

% F5دوار ا BC"4 ال اHI 4"م ا?:

1( 5 5%% 5A/ 5%#.

2( % 5%8 / .\ ! +%0\.

3( 4 ,#A 0 5$ 40 .

4( ?%$0 28 '( =% 6/.

5( ^%" 2 ,A 5%E A.

6( 'E +b 3A 7 1% + J-1 .

7( '# + ^;$ .

8( '# + 28- .

9( 5I 7 #& < ! 5;% 5%%# 5%# 5A% .

10( 6$- 5%%E 68 5%# 5A.

Page 111: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

96

ــ4ـــ

Eــ$

ا

اــ$ات

%

/ % >5

>5

/

11( C +& #5 7 + $ ).

12( @- ! ;( + &) % <A 5#;/.(

13( 58 ) * 5 '%$ 5;% 5%%# 5%# 5;(.

14( J( + + $ &7 ! ;(.

15( %7 n 8 5%A #.

16( 6%B 6 24 2- 4 68 5%# 5%% )%.

17( 5 '%% 7 % W + 61.

18( 5 5%#&7 %7 5A/ 5%7$.

19( 2& # ;( ! + 9 %7 24.

20( .>$E %E 5A + +%0\ .

21( @ ! +%# +%0\ .\.

Page 112: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

97

7 )3(

) $ =,

Page 113: ˆ ' ˇ - meu.edu.jo · س Means standard deviations, Pearson Correlation Coefficient, (t) test, and One Way ANOVA were used to analyze the data . The results showed the following:

98

0 ) $ =,

$ =, $ )

0 4.5

1 ,% /# P% =A D

< / P% =A D

- 1 +%1 / P% =A D

2( B & / '%# %

57%#0 a / P% =A D

7% 4 P& / 5% )

2% $ P% =A D

0 4.5

#% +& P% =A D

% ) 3 P% =A D

4 - 3 P% =A D

& P% =A D