Λ𝒄+ physics at BESIII

Ying-Chao Xu (胥英超）

On behalf of the BESIII Collaboration

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences

2019.10.26 @ Lin Fen

Outline◼ Introduction to the lightest charm baryon Λc

+

◼ BESIII results on its production and decays

⚫ Λc+ hadronic decays BF(Λc

+→pK-π+) +11hadronic modes :PRL 116, 052001 (2016)

BF(Λc+→pK+K-, pπ+π-) :PRL 117, 232002 (2016)

BF(Λc+→nKsπ

+) :PRL 118, 12001 (2017)

BF(Λc+→pη, pπ0) :PRD 95, 111102(R) (2017)

BF(Λc+→ Σ−π+π+π0) :PLB 772, 388 (2017)

BF(Λc+ → Ξ (∗)0K+) : PLB 783,200 (2018)

BF(Λc+ → Σ+𝜼 , Σ+𝜼′) :CPC 43, 083002, (2019)

BF(Λ𝑐+ → Λ 𝜂 𝜋+) :PRD 99, 032010,(2019)

⚫ Λc+ semi-leptonic decay BF(Λc

+→Λe+𝜈𝑒) :PRL 115, 221805(2015)

BF(Λc+→Λμ+𝜈𝜇) : PLB 767, 42 (2017)

⚫ Λc+ inclusive decay Λc

+→Λ+X

BF(𝚲𝐜+→𝚲X) : PRL 121, 062003(2018)

BF(𝚲𝐜+→𝑒X) : PRL 121, 251801(2018)

⚫ Λc+Λc

− pair cross section : PRL 120,132001(2018).

⚫ Λc+ decay parameters measurement :PRD 100, 072004 (2019)

◼ Data taking plan & Summary 2

2019/11/1

new

Renaissance on the charmed heavy baryon

3

⚫ Before 2014, the charmed baryons have been

produced and studied at many experiments,

notably fixed-target experiments (such as

FOCUS and SELEX) and e+e- B-factories

(ARGUS, CLEO, BABAR, and BELLE).

⚫ Large uncertainties in experiment=>Retarder

development in theory.

⚫ Afterwards, more extensive measurements on

charmed baryons are performed at BESIII,

BELLE and LHCb.

◆ The absolute BF measurements at BESIII and BELLE.

◆ The observation of the DCS mode Λc+→pK+π- at BELLE.

◆ The observation of the doubly charmed baryon 𝚵𝐜𝐜++ at

LHCb.

⚫ These experimental progresses have revoked

the activities in the theoretical efforts.2019/11/1

The charmed baryon family

4

⚫ Singly charmed baryons

◆ Established ground states:

𝚲𝐜+, 𝚺𝐜, 𝚵𝐜

(′), 𝛀𝐜

◆ Excited states are being explored

⚫ Doubly charmed baryons( 𝚵𝐜𝒄++) observed

recently.

⚫ No observations of triply charmed baryons.

✓ 𝚲𝐜+ decay only weakly, many recent

experimental progress since 2014.

✓ 𝚺𝐜: B(𝚺𝐜 → 𝚲𝐜+π)~100%, B(𝚺𝐜 → 𝚲𝐜

+𝜸)?

✓ 𝚵𝐜 : decay only weakly; no absolute BF

measured, most relative to 𝚵− π+(π+).

✓ 𝛀𝐜:decay only weakly; no absolute BF

measured.

2019/11/1

𝚲𝐜+: The lightest charmed baryon spectroscopy

5

⚫ Most of the charmed baryons will eventually decay to 𝚲𝐜+.

⚫ The 𝚲𝐜+ is one of important tagging hadrons in c-quark counting in the productions at high energy

experiment.

⚫ Also important input to 𝚲𝒃 (including 𝚵𝐜𝐜++) physics as 𝚲𝒃 decay preferentially to 𝚲𝒄 .

==>Important input to B physics and Vub calculations.

⚫ 𝚲𝐜+ may provide more powerful test on internal dynamics than D/Ds does !

⚫ Naive quark model picture: a heavy quark (c) with an unexcited spin-zero diquark (u-d). Diquark

correlation is enhanced by weak Color Magnetic Interaction with a heavy quark(HQET).

c

ud

sc

→ Strange

baryons(L[uds])

mu, md ≈ ms →

(qqq) uniform

→ Charmed

baryon

(Lc[udc])

mu, md << mc →

diquark + quark

(qq) (Q)

→ Charmed meson

(D+[cഥ𝒅])

md << mc →

quark + heavy quark

(q) (Q)2019/11/1

𝚲𝐜+ weak decays

6

⚫ Contrary to charmed meson, W-exchange contribution is important.(No color

suppress and helicity suppress)

⚫ Phenomenology aim at explain data and predict important observables.

⚫ Calculate what they can(HQET, factorization)+parametrize what they cannot

+ some non-perturbations extracted from data=> explain and predict.

2019/11/1

BESIII data taking @ Λc+Λc

− threshold

7

Energy(GeV) lum.(pb-1)

4.575 47.67

4.580 8.54

4.590 8.16

4.600 567.93

• In 2014, BESIII took data above Λc

pair threshold and run machine at

4.6GeV with excellent performance!

• Measurement using the threshold

pair-productions via e+e-

annihilations is unique: the most

simple and straightforward.

• ~106×103 𝚲𝒄+𝚲𝒄

− pairs make

sensitivity to 10-3.

• First time to systematically study 𝚲𝒄+

at threshold.

• Collect more 𝚲𝒄+ data are in the

schedule.

PRL101 (2008) 172001

BELLE

2019/11/1

Production near threshold and tag technique

• Ecms-2M𝚲c=26MeV only!

• 𝚲𝐜+𝚲𝐜

− produced in pairs with no additional

accompany hadrons.

• e+e-→γ*→ 𝚲𝐜+𝚲𝐜

−

• Clean backgrounds and well constrained

kinematics.

• Typically, two ways to study 𝚲𝐜+ decays:

• Single Tag(ST): detect only one of the 𝜦𝒄+𝜦𝒄

−.

=>Relative higher backgrounds

=>Higher efficiencies

=>Full reconstruction

• Double Tag(DT): detect both of 𝜦𝒄+𝜦𝒄

−

=>Smaller backgrounds.

=>Missing technique.

=>Lower efficiencies.

=>Systematic in tag side are mostly cancelled. 82019/11/1

Several popular variables

9

⚫ ∆E=EΛc-Ebeam

⚫ Beam-Constrained-Mass;

MBC= 𝑬𝐛𝐞𝐚𝐦𝟐 − |𝒑𝚲𝐜|

𝟐

⚫ Emiss=Ebeam-Eh

⚫ 𝒑𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐬= 𝒑𝚲𝐜- 𝒑𝐡

⚫ 𝒑𝚲𝐜= - 𝒑𝐭𝐚𝐠・ 𝑬beam𝟐 −𝒎

𝚲𝐜

𝟐

⚫ Umiss=Emiss-| 𝒑𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐬 |

⚫ Mmiss= 𝑬m𝐢𝐬𝐬𝟐 − |𝒑𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐬|

𝟐

⚫ Ƹ𝑝tag is the direction of the momentum of the singly tagged Λc .

⚫ Eh(ph) are the energy(momentum) of h which are measured in e+e- system.

⚫ mΛc+

is the mass of the Λc+ quoted from the PDG.

2019/11/1

Λc+ reconstruction at BESIII

10

⚫ The BFs are extracted via the double-tag technique.

⚫ BF is determined independent of N𝚲𝐜+𝚲𝐜

−and the systematic due to the reconstruction

of ST side to be canceled.

⚫ ~15400 ST yields and ~1000 DT yields2019/11/1

⚫ No absolute measurement (Model independently) on Λc+ BFs at threshold after Λc

+

discovered(30 years ago).

⚫ A least square global fit taking into account correlations over different modes are

performed to improve the precision.

⚫ The precision of B(pK-π+) are comparable with Belle’s

⚫ The precisions of Λc decay rates is reaching to the level of charmed mesons!

⚫ N𝚲𝐜+𝚲𝐜

−as a byproduct determined to be (105.9±4.8±0.5)×103

Results of 12 Λc+ hadronic decay BFs

11

PRL 116, 052001 (2016)

567pb-1 @ 4.6 GeV

2019/11/1

HFLAV Fit to world BF data

12

Eur. Phys. J. C77, 895 (2017)

⚫ A fitter to constrain the 12 hadronic BFs and 1 SL BF,

based on all the existing experimental data

⚫ Correlated systematics are fully taken into account

◆ The least overall 𝝌2/ndf=30.0/23=1.3

◆ Precise 𝐵 𝑝𝐾−𝜋+ is useful for constrain Vub determined via baryonic mode2019/11/1

Experimental precision reaches of the charmed hadrons

Golden hadronic mode δB/B Golden SL mode δB/B

D0 B(Kπ)=(3.88±0.05)% 1.3% B(Kev)=(3.55±0.05)% 1.4%

D+ B(Kππ)=(9.13±0.19)% 2.1% B(K0ev)=(8.83±0.22)% 2.5%

Ds B(KKpi)=(5.39±0.21)% 3.9% B(ɸev)=(2.49±0.14)% 5.6%

Λc B(pKπ)=(5.0±1.3)%(PDG2014)

=(6.8±0.36)% (BELLE)

=(5.84±0.35)% (BESIII)

=(6.46±0.24)% (HFAG)

26%

5.3%

6.0%

3.7%

B(Λev)=(2.1±0.6)%(PDG2014)

=(3.63±0.43)% (BESIII)

=(3.18±0.32)% (HFAG)

29%

12%

10%

• The precisions of Λc decay rates is reaching to the level of

charmed mesons!

• More data input will further constrain the HFLAV fit.

• However, search for more unknown modes are important132019/11/1

Important Input for b physics⚫ stringent Fragmentation Function of b/c quark to baryon

◆ [Eur. Phys. J. C12, 225 (2000); Eur. Phys. J. C 16, 597 (2000); Phys. Rev. D 85, 032008 (2012),

Phys. Rev.D 66, 091101 (2002).]

◆ Fragmentation Function (FF) is an important probe in experiment to test and calibrate QCD theory.

PhysRevD.85.032008

⚫ Now B(𝒑𝑲−𝝅+) are still dominated

2019/11/1 14

15

CKM matrix element Vub

B(𝑝𝐾−𝜋+) are dominated systematic uncertainty

Nature Physics 11 (2015) 743

2019/11/1

• ST method: 𝚲𝐜+→pK-p+ as ref. mode

• First observation of SCS decay of 𝚲𝐜+→pp+p-

• Improved measurement on the SCS decays 𝚲𝐜+→pK+K-

• 𝚲𝐜+→pϕ are sensitive to non-factorable contributions from C diagrams

16

Singly Cabibbo-Suppressed Decays of

𝚲𝐜+→pp+p- and 𝚲𝐜

+→pK+K-

PRL117,232002(2016)

2019/11/1

Λc+→ p: test large-Nc expansion

17

⚫ Λc+→ p proceeds only through internal W-emission C diagram.

⚫ Input BF ⇒ |a2|=0.450.03, Nc ≈7, close to a2(mc) -0.44(from theory)

⚫ 1/Nc is also applicable to charmed baryon sector.

⚫ BESIII measurement are consistent with previous measurement.

a1 =c1() +c2() (1/Nc +1()),

a2= c2() +c1() (1/Nc +2()),

If 1 = 2 = 0, naïve factorization

If 1 = 2 ≈ -1/Nc, large-Nc factorization

⚫ Charmed meson decays

2019/11/1

PRD.97.074028

18

Singly Cabibbo-Suppressed Decays of 𝚲𝐜+→pp0 and 𝚲𝐜

+→p

⚫ These modes have not been measured before.

⚫ Predicted BFs vary under different theoretical models(SU(3)

symmetry and FSI)

⚫ B(𝛬𝑐+→ p)>>B(𝛬𝑐

+→ pp0) in the SU(3) flavor symmetry generated

by u,d and s

⚫ Nonfactorizable terms contribute constructively to p and

destructively to pp0

⚫ Their relative size is essential to understand the interference ofdifferent non factorizable diagrams.

2019/11/1

19

SCS Decays of 𝚲𝐜+→pp0 and 𝚲𝐜

+→p

PRD,111102(R) (2017)

𝛬𝑐+ → p(→γγ)

𝛬𝑐+→ p(→𝝅+𝝅−𝝅𝟎)

𝛬𝑐+→ pp0

PhysRevD.97.074028

ST method

• First evidence for 𝛬𝑐+→ p with 4.2

• B(𝛬𝑐+→ p)=(1.24±0.28±0.10)×10-3

• No signal seen in 𝛬𝑐+→ pπ0, B(𝛬𝑐

+→ pp0)<2.7×10-4

• d

2019/11/1

2019/11/1 20From Chao-Qiang Geng’ report at Wuhan

?

21

Observation of Λc+→n𝐾𝑠

0p+

PRL,118,112001(2017)

• Peaking background from 𝛬𝑐+→+ (→np+) p+p-

• 2-D fitting extract 83±11 net signals => B[Λc+→n𝐾𝑠

0p+]=(1.820.230.11)%

• B[Λc+→n𝐾0p+]/B[Λc

+→pK-p+]=0.620.09; B[Λc+→n𝐾0p+]/B[Λc

+→pK0p0]=0.970.16

• A test of final state interactions and isospin symmetry in the charmed baryon sector. [PRD93, 056008 (2016)]

⚫ First direct measurement of 𝜦𝒄+decay involving the neutron in the final state.

2019/11/1

22

Study of Λc+→ Σ−π+π+(π0)

PLB 772, 388 (2017)

• 𝜦𝒄+decay involving the neutron in the

final state(missing technique). Less

known in experiment.

• B(𝜦𝒄+→-p+p+p0)= (2.110.33 0.14)%

• B(𝜦𝒄+→-p+p+)= (1.810.17 0.09)%

• more precise than old result (2.3±0.4)%

• B[𝜦𝒄+→-p+p+]/B[𝜦𝒄

+→+p+p-]

=0.420.050.02 better precision than

the previous ratio 0.530.150.07

𝛬𝑐+→ Σ−π+π+

𝛬𝑐+→ Σ−π+π+π0

161±15

88±14

⚫ First observation of a large-rate forgotten channel 𝜦𝒄+→-p+p+p0 (CF decay)

Constrained variables:

2019/11/1

W-exchange-only process Λc+ → Ξ (∗)0K+

23

⚫ 𝚲𝐜+ → 𝚵𝟎(∗)𝐊+ decay only through W-exchange.

⚫ W-exchange are non-factorable in theoretic

calculation.

⚫ Large cancellation both in S-wave and P-wave.

⚫ This measurement helps in calibration of the W-

exchange process in the charmed baryon sector.

⚫ The previous measurements have poor precision.

ARGUS

CLEO

CLEO

2019/11/1

W-exchange-only process Λc+ → Ξ (∗)0K+

24

⚫ Double tag and missing 𝚵𝟎(∗) to increase the detection

efficiency.

⚫ Low backgrounds because the anti-strangeness of K+

⚫ First absolute measurement, using world largest on-

threshold data at 𝒔=4.6GeV

⚫ Improved precision

⚫ No model can accommodate the both rates

6.4σ10.3σ

2019/11/1

PLB 783,200 (2018)

𝛬𝑐+ → 𝛴+𝜂, 𝛴+𝜂′

25

⚫ Decay through internal W-emission and W-exchange.

⚫ Both are non-factorable in theoretic calculation.

⚫ Large variations in theory: B(𝜦𝒄+ → 𝜮+𝜼) =(0.11-0.94)%, B(𝜦𝒄

+ → 𝜮+𝜼′) =(0.1-1.28)%

⚫ 𝜦𝒄+ → 𝜮+𝜼 is measured by CLEO with BF=(0.700.23)% (~33% uncertainty)

⚫ 𝜦𝒄+ → 𝜮+𝜼′ is not observed yet.

2019/11/1

CPC 43, 083002, (2019)

𝛬𝑐+ → 𝛴+𝜂 , 𝛴+𝜂′

262019/11/1

CPC 43, 083002, (2019)

3.2σ2.5σ

⚫ 𝜦𝒄+ → 𝜮+𝜼 is smaller than CLEO but

still compatible within uncertainty.

⚫ 𝜦𝒄+ → 𝜮+𝜼′ is measured for first time.

⚫ Our measurement contradict with

most theoretical calculations.

2019/11/1 27From Chao-Qiang Geng’ report at Wuhan

2019/11/1 28

Absolute BF for Λ𝑐+ → Λ 𝜂 𝜋+

PRD 99, 032010,(2019)

292019/11/1

1.We have measured the branching fraction of the decay Λ𝑐+ → Λ 𝜂 𝜋+

as (1.84 ± 0.21 ± 0.15)%more precise than (2.3 ± 0.5) % in current PDG.

2. Branching fraction of decay Λ𝑐+ → Σ∗+𝜂 is measured as

(0.91 ± 0.08 ± 0.09)%more precise than (1.24 ± 0.37) % in current PDG.

3. These are the first absolute measurements of the branching fractions

for these two modes, and are consistent with the previous relative

measurements ,but with improved precisions.

Absolute BF for Λ𝑐+ → Λ 𝜂 𝜋+

PRD 99, 032010,(2019)

30

Absolute BF for 𝜦𝒄+→𝜦l+𝝂𝒍

PRL 115, 221805(2015) • Benchmark channel via the CF

transition c→sl+𝝂𝒍

• BESIII measured the

electronic mode 𝜦𝒄+→𝜦e+𝝂𝒆 by

missing the neutrino.

• Provides stringent test for

nonperturbative aspects of the

theory of strong interaction.

• Important input for

implementing and calibrating

the LQCD calculations.

𝛬𝑐+→𝛬e+𝜈𝑒

104±11 signal

B[𝜦𝒄+→𝜦e+𝝂𝒆]=(3.360.380.20)%

2019/11/1𝛬𝑐+→𝑛e+𝜈𝑒 is very urgent in theory.

31

Study on 𝛬𝑐+→𝛬μ+𝜈𝜇

• Double tag and missing neutrino.

• Peaking backgrounds from muon-pion mis-ID

• B[𝜦𝒄+→𝜦μ+𝝂𝝁]=(3.490.460.27)%

=>improved precision,

=>first absolute measurements.

• G[𝜦𝒄+→𝜦μ+𝝂𝝁]/G[𝜦𝒄

+→𝜦e+𝝂𝒆]= 0.96±0.16±0.04

=>compatible with unity

𝛬𝑐+→𝛬μ+𝜈𝜇

79±11 signal

𝛬𝑐+→𝛬π+π0

PLB 767, 42 (2017)

2019/11/1

32𝛬𝑐+→𝛬l+𝜈𝑙 BF is the largest error source.2019/11/1

The inclusive channel 𝜦𝒄+→𝜦+X

33

⚫ The inclusive process mediated by the c-s transition.

⚫ Essential input in the calculation of the 𝜦𝒄+ life time.

⚫ Useful in understanding the heavier charmed baryons, esp. the less known double-

or triple-charm baryons.

⚫ Current PDG: BF(𝜦𝒄+→𝜦+X)=(3511)% with large uncertainty.

⚫ The sum of know exclusive modes only accounts for (24.52.1)% => need better

understanding of the gap between exclusive and inclusive rates.

⚫ Comparison with K+X will shed light on the 𝜦𝒄+ internal dynamics.

⚫ Search for the CPV by measuring the asymmetry.

2019/11/1

The inclusive channel 𝜦𝒄+→𝜦+X

34

⚫ In the ST modes of 𝚲𝐜+→pK-p+ and

p𝐾𝑠0, to measure the probability of find

a 𝜦 in the final states.

⚫ Extract yields from 2D distributions in

bins of 𝑝−|𝑐𝑜𝑠𝜃|

⚫ Data-driven 2D efficiency correction

using several 𝜦 control samples.

⚫ ℬ 𝛬𝐶+ → 𝛬 + 𝑋 = （38.2−2.2

+2.8 ± 0.8)%

(excl. rate (24.5 ± 2.1)% observed,

indicates ~1/3 BFs are unknown)

⚫ Acp = (2.1−6.6+7.0 1.4)%

(No CPV is observed.)

data

PRL 121, 062003(2018)

2019/11/1

⚫ Comparison with K+X will shed

light on the internal dynamics

𝜦𝒄+→𝒆+𝝂𝒆+X

35

⚫ Current PDG: BF(𝜦𝒄+→𝒆+X)=(4.51.7)%.

⚫ Large rate, but also with large uncertainty

⚫ Tagged with 𝚲𝐜+→pK-p+ and p𝐾𝑠

0

=>

=>

⚫ The 𝜦l+𝝂𝒍 dominate the l++X =>𝓑 (pKl+𝝂𝒍)~10-3.

PPRL 121,251801(2018)

2019/11/1

Why 𝚲𝒄+→Le+ne are dominated?

36

B[Lc+→Le+v]=(3.630.380.20)%

Umiss (GeV)

Even

ts /

0.0

10 (G

eV)

PRL 115, 221805 (2015)

B[Lc+→e++X]=(4.310.4)%

2019/11/1

PPRL 121,251801(2018)

The cross-section of baryon pair

37

PRD97,032013(2018)

2019/11/1

Cross-section and EMFF of e+e-→ Λc+Λc

− near threshold

38

Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 132001 (2018).

⚫ One of the most basic observables that intimately related to

the internal structure of the nucleon.

⚫ One of the most challenging questions in contemporary

physics is why and how quarks are confined into hadrons.

⚫ The electromagnetic form factors (EMFFs) have been a

powerful tool in understanding the structure of nucleons.

2019/11/1

Λc+ decay parameters measurement

2019/11/1 39

Λc+ decay parameters measurement

2019/11/1 40

Λc+ decay parameters measurement

2019/11/1 41

Result

Λc+ decay parameters measurement

2019/11/1 42

Other efforts from experimental side

2019/11/1 43

⚫ Inclusive measurement of 𝛬𝑐+ → 𝐾𝑠

0𝑋, 𝐾𝑋

⚫ 𝚲𝒄+→ne+ne is under investigate even very

challenging.

Data taking plan

2019/11/1 44

From Changzheng Yuan’s report at Fudan

July 5, 2019

Push the precisions to the level of those of D/Ds mesons.

Hadronic decays

• PWA analysis of hadronic decays: hadron spectroscopy

• studies of the modes involving n/Σ/Ξ particles

• more Cabbibo-suppressed modes, esp. W-exchange only process

SL decays :

• so far, only Le+ne mode is measured; How about pK- e+ne?

• many more SL modes can be established

golden mode δB/B SL δB/B

D0 B(Kpi)=(3.88±0.05)% 1.3% B(K e v)=(3.55±0.05)% 1.4%

D+ B(Kpipi)=(9.13±0.19)% 2.1% B(K0 e v)=(8.83±0.22)% 2.5%

Ds B(Kkpi)=(5.39±0.21)% 3.9% B(phi e v)=(2.49±0.14)% 5.6%

Λc

B(pKpi)=(5.0±1.3)% (PDG2014)

=(6.8±0.36)% (BELLE)

=(5.84±0.35)% (BESIII)

=(5.84±0.18)% (new

BESIII)

26%

5.3%

6.0%

3.0%

B(Λev)=(2.1±0.6)%(PDG2014)

=(3.63±0.43)% (BESIII)

=(3.63±0.20)% ( new BESIII)

29%

12%

5.4%

Precision Prospects（1）

2019/11/1 45

Precision Prospects（2）

2019/11/1 46

• Prospects with the proposed new 𝛬𝑐+ data set

✓ precise measurement of the W-exchange and W-internal-

emission only process: to test the quark-diquark configuration

important to understand the non-factorizable contribution

✓ establishment of more SL and neutron modes: 𝑛𝑙𝜐, 𝑝𝐾𝑙𝜐, …

✓ search for more decay modes unexplored yet in experiment

A good chance for BESIII to systematically enhance

our knowledge on 𝜦𝒄+ decays ( to the level of D/Ds

mesons )• Better understanding of baryonic structure

• many new observations

• refresh the precisions in old data

Energies go up to 5GeV

2019/11/1 47

The charmed baryon spectroscopies

48

If BEPCII can access energies up to

5GeV, we can study the Λ𝑐, Σ𝑐 and

Ξ𝑐 at threshold.

• Study on the isospin triplet Σ𝑐• First absolute measurements of

Ξ𝑐 decays

c

Λ𝑐+ Σ 𝑐

++c

Σ 𝑐+

c

c

Ξ𝑐+

c

Ξ𝑐0 Σ 𝑐

0c

2019/11/1

49

Partiale Width of decay of Σc+

BESIII will search for the EM decay

(MeV)

(keV)

◼ Precise determination of Γ Σ𝑐+ → Λ𝑐

+𝜋0 can be used for testing heavy quark

symmetry and chiral symmetry

◼ measurements of Σ𝑐+ & c(2520) widths by Belle [PRD89, 091102 (2014)]:

Γ Σ𝑐+ → Λ𝑐

+𝜋0 is not easy for Belle; BESIII has potential to improve it.

Wise; Yan et al.; Burdman, Donoghue (’92)

2019/11/1

Ξ𝑐 (usc)： 3-star particle in PDG

2019/11/150

No absolute branching fractions have been measured/calculated

𝜩𝒄𝟎: relative to the decay of 𝜩−𝝅+𝜩𝒄

+: relative to the decay of 𝜩−𝟐𝝅+

Very limited knowledge on their decays

We have opportunity to firstly fill up the decay tables

Most of the Ξ𝑐 weak decays to BP are missing in

experiment.

2019/11/1 51

BFs of Cabibbo-allowed decays

RQM Pole Pole RQM Pole Pole (in units of %)

2019/11/1 52

Decay asymmetry for Cabibbo-allowed decays

Longitudinal pol. of daughter baryon from unpol. parent baryon

⇒ information on the relative sign between s- and p-waves

Most of the Ξ𝑐 weak decay asymmetries are

missing in experiment.

Summary

2019/11/1 53

➢ Threshold data at BESIII opens a new door to direct measurements of the

decays ➔precise study of Λc decays

◆ kinematics does not allow additional particle produced along with the Λ𝑐+Λ𝑐

− pair

◆ fully reconstruct the pairs and take their yield ratios to measure the BFs:

◆ low backgrounds and high detection efficiency

➢ Era of precision study of the Λc decays:

◆ provide more data for theorists to develop more reliable models

◆ precise measurement of the W-exchange and W-internal-emission only process: to test the

quark-diquark configuration

important to understand the non-factorizable contribution

◆ explore as-yet-unmeasured channels and understand full picture of intermediate structures

➢ Data taking plan;

a golden opportunity to thoroughly improve our knowledge on Λc decays

Thanks

2019/11/1 54