092011 Lakeport City Council - Council Business

8/4/2019 092011 Lakeport City Council - Council Business

1/76

CITY OF LAK

Lakeport RedevelopCity of Lakeport Municipal S

STAFF REPORT

RE: Ordinance Establishing Speed Limits MEETING DAT

SUBMITTED BY: Scott Harter, City Engineer

PURPOSE OF REPORT: Information only Discussion Action Item

WHAT IS BEING ASKED OF THE CITY COUNCIL/AGENCY/BOARD:

The City Council is being asked to receive the speed zone survey conducted by Phillip J. DTraffic Engineer, and introduce the proposed ordinance establishing speed limits based on

recommendations of the report.

BACKGROUND:

Earlier this summer the City received a report from the Lake County/City Area Planning Ccompiles the results of a speed zone survey completed for the City of Lakeport. The speedconducted under Work Element 603 of the 2010/2011 Transportation Planning Work Proaccordance with standard engineering practices and the relevant sections of the California VAttached for your review is a summary of the existing speed zones and the recommended

the areas surveyed.

There were thirty-two segments of roadway surveyed, and there are changes recommendedincreases of 5 mph are recommended for three segments, and the remaining three are recoposted at 25 mph where currently no posting exists. This information was presented to, anthe Traffic Safety Advisory Committee as a non-action item due to the desire to bring this action in a timely manner at their previous meeting. The only concern voiced by membersthe proposed increased speed on Hartley Street from Twentieth Street to the northern city

fact that the school is adjacent to a portion of this segment. This can be addressed by the School Speed Limit Assembly C limiting the speed limit to 25 mph in the vicinity of the sc

DISCUSSION:

The recommendations of the report only result in a 5 mph increase for three segments of rconsistent with current legislation which governs the establishment of speed limits. If the


2/76

OPTIONS:

Introduce the proposed Ordinance, which is consistent with the traffic and engineering stuset a public hearing to consider adoption thereof for the October 18, 2011, City Council M

OR

Provide further direction to staff regarding the proposed ordinance.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None $1,800 Account Number:

SUGGESTED MOTIONS:

Move to introduce the proposed ordinance establishing speed limits and set the public hea

adoption thereof for the October 18, 2011, City Council Meeting.

Attachments: Proposed OrdinanceSpeed Zone Study report summary and table


3/76

ORDINANCE NO. ________ (2011)

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF LAKEPORT REPEALING THE CURRENT LANGULAKEPORT MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 10.16 AND REPLA

WITH LANGUAGE WHICH REFLECTS THE CURRENENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEYS PERFORME

WHEREAS, Lakeport Municipal CodeChapter 10.16 sets forth speed limits in thLakeport established by engineering and traffic surveys; and

WHEREAS, recent engineering and traffic surveys have been performed by a professional engineer who is recommending changes in the speed zones for various loc

NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKDOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1: That the current language set forth in Chapter 10.16 is repealed in it

Section 2: Chapter 10.16 shall read as follows:

10.16.010 Twenty miles per hour. A. Lange Street from Lakeshore Blvd. to Forest Drive

10.16.020 Twenty-Five miles per hour.

A. All city streets unless posted otherwise

10.16.025 Twenty-Five miles per hour recommended to be posted A. Armstrong Street from Berry Street to Main StreetB. Giselman Street from Lakeshore Blvd. to Lange StreetC. Mellor Drive from Eleventh Street to 170 north of Page DriveD. Sixth Street from Spurr Street to Main StreetE. Sixteenth Street from Mellor Drive to High Street

F. Twentieth Street from Hartley Street to High Street

10.16.030 Thirty miles per hour.A. Bevins Street from Martin Street to Lakeport Blvd.B. Forbes Street from Martin Street to Clear Lake Ave.C. Hartley Street from Clear Lake Ave. to Twentieth Street.D High Street from Clearlake Aven e to T entieth Street


4/76

10.16.040 Thirty-Five miles per hour.

A. Hartley Street from Twentieth Street to northern City LimitsB. Lakeshore Blvd. from Lange to northern City Limits.

C. South Main Street from 575 feet south of Lakeport Blvd. to souLimits.

D. Parallel Drive from Lakeport Blvd. to 1500 feet south of LakepE. Eleventh Street from 1,100 feet west of Mellor Drive to western

10.16.050 Forty miles per hour. A. Martin Street from Bevins Street to western City Limits.

Section 3: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of thifor any reason held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validitremaining portions of this ordinance.

The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this and each sectiophrase, or clause thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsector clauses be declare unconstitutional on their face or as applied.

Section 4: This Ordinance shall take effect 30 days after the date of its adoptioto the expiration of 15 days from the passage thereof shall be published at least once inCounty Record Bee, a newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the Lakeport and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be in full force and effect.

This ordinance was introduced before the City Council of the City of Lakepomeeting thereof on the 20th day of September, 2011, by the following vote:

AYES:NOES:ABSENT:ABSTAINING:

This Ordinance was duly enacted by the City Council of the City of Lakepomeeting thereof on the 18th day of October, 2011, by the following vote:

AYES:NOES:ABSENT:ABSTAINING:


5/76


6/76

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. Introduction 1

II. Study Procedure 3

III. Findings and Analysis 4

Table 1 Lakeport Speed Study 18

IV. Summary of Recommendations 19

Appendix A - Accident Report Summaries

Appendix B Traffic Volume Reports

Appendix C - Speed Study Reports


7/76

I. INTRODUCTION

This speed zone survey was completed for the City of Lakeport by staff of the La

County/City Area Planning Council under Work Element 603 of the 2010/11Transportation Planning Work Program.

Various sections of the California Vehicle Code contribute to the importance of csystematic speed zone surveys on the Citys street system. Section 22352 descri

conditions where prima facie speed limits of 15 and 25 MPH apply. Section 223permits local authorities, on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey, to incr

speed limits to 30, 35, 40, 45, 50 or 55 miles per hour to facilitate the orderly mo

traffic on streets where a 25 MPH limit would otherwise apply. Similarly, Sectiopermits local authorities to decrease speed limits, based upon an engineering and

study, to a speed below the maximum speed limit (C.V.C. Section 22349).

An engineering and traffic survey is defined in the California Vehicle Code to beof highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the

Department of Transportation. The engineering and traffic survey specifically in

consideration of all of the following:

1. Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measureme

2. Accident records.

3. Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to tdriver.

Study procedures followed in this speed zone survey are consistent with Californ

Code requirements and California Department of Transportation methods for trafengineering surveys.

Traffic and engineering surveys are mandated by the legislature as a prerequisitezone establishment to ensure that resulting speed zones are reasonable and safe.

Reasonable speed limits are those that somewhat conform to the actual behavior

majority of motorists who drive the street under study. Therefore, a major comptraffic and engineering survey is a sample of prevailing speeds on radar, followin

study procedures. Results of the spot speed survey are not conclusive, but must b

reconciled with historic accident data and an analysis of road, traffic, and roadsid

conditions.


8/76

In recognition of the dynamic nature of traffic flow and in a particular effort to el

the use of speed traps, the legislature enacted C.V.C. Section 40802 in 1973. S

40802 of the California Vehicle Code requires that speed zones be justified by anengineering and traffic survey every 5 years if the local authority wishes to enfor

speed limit on that facility by radar or other electronic device. Under certain cond

that entail systematic enforcement training and equipment testing, the validity ofengineering and traffic surveys may be extended to 7 years.


9/76

II. STUDY PROCEDURE

Radar spot speed studies procedures are outlined in the Caltrans Traffic Manual.

sample of vehicle speeds is taken of vehicles moving in both directions at each suStudies should be conducted from an inconspicuously parked, unmarked vehicle

sizes of 100 vehicles are considered statistically adequate to derive good results.

lightly traveled areas, sample sizes may sometimes be lower, but should representwo hours of survey time. Survey times were at off-peak hours (except in low vo

areas) to ensure that recorded speeds reflected roadway conditions, not traffic con

Speed data collected for this study utilized traffic data recorders at all locations. F

Jamar Technologies, Inc. TRAX RD Plus traffic data recorders were used betweeand June, 2011 to collect the prevailing speed data. This technology is especially

suited to low volume roadways that are characteristic of some of the residential s

surveyed.

Accident data on the surveyed roadway was also reviewed. Statewide Integrated

Records System reports, compiled by the California Highway Patrol for Lakepor

reviewed for the three-year period including 2008, 2009, and 2010. Data for 201for the entire calendar year even though the information was pulled in June 2001

accidents in which vehicle speed was specifically identified as a factor were iden

summary of accident data gathered for each of the roadway segments surveyed apthis report.

The third part of this study involved review of traffic and roadway conditions. Tfactors noted included traffic controls, volume, parking and pedestrians. Roadwa

conditions reviewed included width, driveways, roadside development, curvatureshoulders, terrain, obstructions, structures, sight distance, and pavement conditio


10/76

III. FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS

Traffic and engineering survey analysis begins with review of spot speed study d

meaning and significance of the various parameters used in spot speed study analfollows:

1. 85th Percentile or Critical speed is that speed at or below which 8percent of the observed vehicles are traveling. Through extensive

nationwide study, it is generally agreed that the 85th Percentile sprepresents the preferred speed of the reasonable and prudent drive

most conditions. Therefore, the 85th Percentile speed is the prima

indicator of the speed limit which might be imposed unless modifdeemed appropriate due to accident, traffic, or roadway factors.

2. Pace is the 10 miles per hour range of observed speeds which con

greatest number of observations. The 85th Percentile speed is genthe upper end of the Pace or slightly outside this parameter.

3. Percent in Pace is a secondary indicator which shows what percenthe entire sample lies within the Pace. The more vehicles in the P

less likelihood there is of traffic collisions.

4. 50th Percentile Speed or Median Speed is that speed above and be

which 50 percent of the sample speed lie.

5. Mode is that speed in the sample which recorded the highest numb

observations. The Mode is frequently near the 50th Percentile spealmost always within the Pace.

6. Range of Speed is simply the speeds of the slowest and fastest veh

observed. Wide ranges typically indicated the need for speed lim

adjustment, enforcement, or other measures.

Once field data has been gathered and the above parameters have been calculated

professional judgment comes into play. Spot speed study results (chiefly the 85tPercentile Speed or Critical Speed), accident history, and traffic and roadway con

must be considered to formulate a recommended speed. Spot speed study results

recommended speeds based on this study are summarized in Table 1.

A discussion of considerations used for analysis for each of the 32 street segmen


11/76

IV. STREET SEGMENT ANALYSIS

The following analysis of thirty-two street segments in the Lakeport street system is based upon

study results, traffic and roadway factors, and accident history:

1. Armstrong StreetVolume: 460 vpd 85th P: 30 mph Pace: 21-30 mph Existing SL.: N

Armstrong Street is a relatively low volume local street. It is identified as a collector in

circulation element if the Lakeport General Plan. It extends from Berry Street to Main S

speed zone survey site between Lakeview and Polk was selected to represent Armstrong

Analysis of the results indicates a Critical Speed of 30 MPH, a Pace of 21-30 MPH, and

sampled vehicles in the pace. Street width varies greatly, but is generally 24 to 36 feet in

Curb and gutter exists in some areas, but generally there are no shoulders. There were n

accidents during the analysis period. The street is not currently posted.

This street is characterized by rolling topography and moderate vertical curvature. Ther

discontinuous pedestrian facilities, obscured intersections and very poor pavement cond

This street meets the definition of Residence District in the California Vehicle Cod

qualifies for posting as a prima facie 25 mph zone. It is recommended that 25 mph

posted and this street be removed from the speed zone review program.

2. Bevins Street (Bevins Court Martin Street)Volume: 3300 vpd 85

thP: 35 mph Pace: 26-35 mph Existing S.L.: 3

Bevins Street is a collector which extends from Lakeport Boulevard to Martin Street. Its

route between downtown Lakeport and the Route 29 freeway is increasing as volumes a

associated congestions rise of South Main Street and Lakeport Boulevard. Current avera

are approximately 3,300 per day. The site of the spot speed study for this segment was 3

south of Martin Street. The study area for the effect of this analysis ranges from Bevins Martin Street. Results of the study indicates a Critical Speed of 35 MPH, Pace of 26-35

percent in pace of 68 for this segment. Sight distance limitations are a concern at Bevins

a left turn lane, acceleration lane, and warning signs mitigate this situation. There was o

accident in the analysis period on this street segment, and it was not speed related. It wa

damage accident south of Martin Street with a PCF involving drugs/alcohol.

This street segment is characterized by moderate traffic volumes, steep vertical curvatur

curvature, a hilltop junction (Bevins Court), and significant roadside development. A sp

lower than indicated by the 85th Percentile is warranted by conditions.

A speed limit of 30 MPH is recommended for this street segment.

3. Bevins Street (Lakeport Boulevard Bevins Court)Volume: 4000 vpd 85th P: 35 mph Pace: 26-35 mph Existing S.L.: 3


12/76

This street segment is characterized by moderate traffic volumes, steep vertical curvatur

curvature, a hilltop junction (Bevins Court), and significant roadside development. A sp

lower than indicated by the 85th Percentile is warranted by conditions.

A speed limit of 30 MPH is recommended for this segment of Bevins Street.

4. South Forbes Street (Martin Street 6th Street)Volume: 2600 vpd 85

thP: 34 mph Pace: 21-30 mph Existing S.L.: 3

Forbes Street is a north-south arterial which supplements the Main Street arterial near d

Lakeport. It extends from D Street to 16th Street, carrying approximately 2,600 vehicles

selected spot speed study site between Armstrong and 1st Street is intended to represent

between Martin Street and 6

th

Street. Analysis of results indicates a Critical Speed of 34Pace of 21-30 MPH, and percent in pace of 62%. There were three reported accidents on

segment during the analysis period. All three were intersection accidents, with one being

related, and producing no injuries.

This street is characterized by steep vertical curves and frequent pedestrian activity.

The speed limit on this segment of Forbes Street was increased from 25mph to 30 mph a

recommended in the 2006 Speed Zone Study. The slight increase in Critical Speed from

2006 to 34mph in 2011 may be the result of new paving. The Pace remained at 21-30 m

2006 to 2011. Analysis of prevailing conditions and accident data continues to support aspeed limit in this street segment.

A speed limit of 30 MPH is recommended for this segment of South Forbes Street.

5. North Forbes Street (6th Street Clear Lake Avenue)

Volume: 3450 vpd 85th P: 32 mph Pace: 21-30 mph Existing S.L.: 3

Forbes Street is a collector street from Martin Street to Clear Lake Avenue. The spot spelocation between 8th Street and 9th Street was selected to represent the collector portion

Street between 6th Street and Clear Lake Avenue. Study results at that location reveal a C

Speed of 32 MPH, a Pace of 21-30 MPH, and 70 percent of sampled vehicles in the pac

width is 45 feet in this segment, which accommodates two through lanes and on-street p

There is a moderate vertical curve in the vicinity of the spot speed location and traffic v

3450 vehicles per day. There were 2 accidents reported on North Forbes during the anal

Both were property damage and neither were speed-related.

The speed limit on this segment of Forbes Street was increased from 25mph to 30 mph arecommended in the 2006 Speed Zone Study. The slight increase in Critical Speed from

2006 to 32mph in 2011 may be the result of new paving. The Pace remained at 21-30 m

2006 to 2011.

A speed limit of 30 MPH is recommended for this segment of North Forbes Street.


13/76

21-30 MPH, and percent in pace of 75 was derived from the sample of this area. A steep

curve, cresting near Hillcrest Drive, is responsible for poor sight distance in the area of t

Stop controls require stopping near the crest of the hill. The street is within a school zon

Pedestrians are frequent. There were no reported accidents on this street during the anal

This street, a school route, is characterized by steep vertical curvature, discontinuous pe

facilities, and 3-Way STOP signs at Hillcrest (at the crest of a vertical curve).




7. Hartley Street (Clear Lake Avenue 20

th

Street)Volume: 1600 vpd 85th P: 36 mph Pace: 26-35 mph Existing S.L.: 3

Hartley Street is a collector street which serves neighborhoods of northwest Lakeport. T

extends from Clear Lake Avenue to the north city limits. A location between 16th and 17

was selected to represent the segment between Clear Lake Avenue and 20th Street. Traff

in this segment are approximately 1,600 per day. The speed survey at that point found a

Speed of 36 MPH, a pace of 26-35 MPH. and 72 percent of the sample within the pace.

in this segment varies from 24 to 38 feet, with on-street parking available in the wider a

distance is fair in most areas. There was one reported accident on this segment of Hartle

analysis period. It was an injury accident at the intersection of 16th Street with a reportedROW violation. There were no speed-related accidents.

Hartley Street lacks shoulders, but curb and gutter is available in some developed areas.

characterized by moderate vertical curvature in rolling terrain, discontinuous pedestrian

and poor pavement condition. A speed limit lower than indicated by the 85th Percentile

warranted by roadway conditions.

A speed limit of 30 MPH is recommended on this segment of Hartley Street.

8. Hartley Street (20th Street City Limits)


Hartley Street is a collector street which serves the neighborhoods of northwest Lakepor

extends from Clear Lake Avenue to the north city limits, carrying approximately 690 ve

day. A location north of Anastasia was selected to represent the segment of Hartley betw

Street and the north city limits. The speed survey at that point found a Critical Speed of

Pace of 31-40 MPH, and 58 percent of the sample was within the pace. This segment of

traverses a hilly area with no pedestrian facilities. There are steep vertical as well as hor

curves. Street width averages only 24 feet, and no shoulders are available. A stop is requ

intersection because of sight distance limitations on a hill crest. There was one reported

during the analysis period. It was near Anastasia and involved driver alcohol/drugs, cau

There were no speed-related accidents.

h d li i h d f 25 h 30 h l f h 2006 d


14/76

visibility. Speed zoning guidelines (established recently by the California Committee on

Control Devices) have removed discretion from transportation professionals to recomm

limits more than 5 mph less than indicated by the Critical Speed.

A speed limit of 35 MPH is recommended for this segment of Hartley Street.

9. High Street (Clear Lake Avenue 20th Street)

Volume: 7500 vpd 85th

P: 35 mph Pace: 26-35 mph Existing S.L.: 3

High Street is a component of Lakeports north-south arterial system which also include

Street, a portion of Clear Lake Avenue, and Lakeshore Boulevard. Volumes are high, re

7,500 vehicles per day. The speed analysis site near 17th Street is intended to represent H

between Clear Lake Avenue and 20

th

Street. Analysis of this spot speed survey indicatesSpeed of 35 MPH, a Pace of 26-35 MPH, and 80 percent of vehicles in the sample were

pace. Street width is 40 feet, which accommodates two through lanes, a two-way center

and bicycle lanes. There is slight horizontal and vertical curvature except at both termin

sharp turns are required. There were three reported accidents on this segment of High St

the analysis period. Two of these were speed-related, one of which produced injuries. T

constraints on this street segment are considered to be the sharp turns at both termini as

turning movements to accommodate adjacent commercial development.

The speed limit on High Street was changed from 25 mph to 30 mph as a result of the 20

survey. The Critical Speed was 34 mph as monitored in 2006 and the Pace has remained

The Critical Speed and Pace indicate that a speed limit of 35 mph would be appropriate.

there are multiple reasons to reduce the speed that include: narrowness of lanes, turning

through the center turn lane, narrow bicycle lanes, and sharp turns at both street termini

A speed limit of 30 MPH is recommended for the entire length of High Street.

10. Lakeport BoulevardVolume: 8800 vpd 85th P: 33 mph Pace: 26-35 mph Existing S.L.: 3

Lakeport Boulevard is one of Lakeports two primary east-west arterials. Approximatel

vehicles per day use this street. It extends from Parallel Drive to Main Street, connectin

Route 29 with downtown. The spot speed study site was 250 feet west of the South Forb

junction. It was selected to represent the entire length of Lakeport Boulevard. Results of

speed study indicate a Critical Speed of 33 MPH, a Pace of 26-35 MPH, and 62 percent

sample within the pace. Street width varies between 38 and 50 feet, with an acceleration

deceleration lane provided at the new Brunos Market property. Sight distance is good. T

four reported accidents on this street during the accident analysis period. The single spe

accident was east of Larrecou, resulting in injuries. The other three were scattered, one o

near the roundabout at Parallel.

The Critical Speed and Pace indicate that a speed limit of 35 mph would be appropriate.

there are multiple reasons to reduce the speed that include: relatively high traffic volum

f i d dj i l d l


15/76


16/76

There were no reported accidents during the analysis period.

The speed limit on Lange Street was increased from 15mph to 20 mph as recommended

Speed Zone Study. The Pace remained at 26-35 mph from 2006 to 2011and the Critical

decreased from 24 mph to 22 mph.

A speed limit of 20 MPH is recommended for Lange Street.

14. North Main Street (1st

Street Clear Lake Avenue)

Volume: 10700 vpd 85th P: 30 mph Pace: 21-30 mph Existing: 30 mp

Main Street is a component of Lakeports north-south arterial system which also include

Main Street, a portion of Clear Lake Avenue, High Street, and Lakeshore Boulevard. Av

volumes on this segment were monitored at 10,700 vehicles per day. The speed survey l

north of 7th Street was selected to represent North Main Street between 1st Street and Cl

Avenue. Analysis of speed survey data indicates Critical Speed of 30 MPH, a Pace of 21

and 74 percent of sample vehicles within the pace. Width in this area is 56 feet, which

accommodates two through lanes, a center turn lane, and on-street parking. There were

accidents within this heavily traveled segment during the analysis period. Three of these

related. Most were intersection accidents, with concentrations at 5th

Street and at 1st

Stre

The speed limit on this segment of North Main Street was increased from 25mph to 30 m

recommended in the 2006 Speed Zone Study. The Critical Speed and Pace has remainedfrom 2006 monitored levels (30 mph and 21-30 mph).

A speed limit of 30 MPH is recommended for North Main Street.

15. South Main Street (Martin Street - 1st Street) Site A


South Main Street is a component if Lakeports north-south arterial system which also iNorth Main Street, a portion of Clear Lake Avenue, High Street, and Lakeshore Boulev

speed study site between Armstrong and 1st Street was selected to represent the street se

Martin Street to 1st Street. Analysis of spot speed data indicates a Critical Speed of 29

of 21-30 MPH, and 77 percent of the sample within the Pace. The roadway width in this

typically 57 feet, which accommodates two travel lanes, on-street parking and a center t

Volumes are heavy, at approximately 12,300 vehicles per day in some areas. There were

accidents on this segment during the analysis period, of which one was speed-related.

The speed limit on this segment of South Main Street was increased from 25 mph to 30

recommended in the 2006 Speed Zone Study. A spot speed survey was not conducted at

location in 2006, but results of the 2011 survey are consistent with a 30 mph speed limit

A speed limit of 30 MPH is recommended for this segment of South Main Street.

16 S h i S ( k l d i S ) Si


17/76

roadway width in this area is typically 57 feet, which accommodates two travel lanes, on

parking and a center turn lane. Volumes are heavy, at approximately 13,800 vehicles pe

some areas. There were 11 reported accidents on this segment during the analysis period

were speed-related. Accidents were dispersed throughout the segment, with a slight con

between Lily Cove and Helena.

The speed limit on this segment of South Main Street was increased from 25 mph to 30

recommended in the 2006 Speed Zone Study. The Pace increased from 21-30 mph to 26

since the change, but the Critical Speed increased only from 31 mph to 32 mph.

A speed limit of 30 MPH is recommended for this segment of South Main Street.

17. South Main Street (City Limits Lakeport Boulevard) Site C


South Main Street is a component of Lakeports north-end arterial system which also in

Main Street, a portion of Clear Lake Avenue, High Street, and Lakeshore Boulevard. Th

study site 270 feet south of Kimberley is one of 3 sites selected to monitor speeds within

segment from the city limits to Lakeshore Boulevard. The Critical Speed in this area wa

39 MPH, the Pace at 31-40 MPH, and 73 percent of the sample was found to be in the P

volumes in this area are approximately 10,900 per day. Sight distance is generally good

widths are constrained in some areas. There were 6 reported accidents in the entire leng

Main Street from the city limits to Lakeport Boulevard during the five-year analysis perthese were speed related.

This segment of South Main Street is characterized by varying roadway widths, a two-w

turn lane, frequent turning movements, high traffic volumes, and discontinuous pedestri

A speed limit lower than indicated by the 85th Percentile is warranted by conditions.

A speed limit of 35 MPH is recommended for this street segment to a point 575 fee

Lakeport Boulevard.

18. South Main Street (City Limits Lakeport Boulevard) Site D



Main Street, a portion of Clear Lake Avenue, High Street, and Lakeshore Boulevard. Th

study site 150 feet south of Industrial is one of 3 sites selected to monitor the segment fr

limits to Lakeshore Boulevard. The Critical Speed in this area was sampled at 39 MPH,

31-40 MPH, and 68 percent of the sample was found to be in the Pace. Traffic volume i

approximately 10,400 per day. Sight distance is generally good, although widths are con

some areas. There were 6 reported accidents in the entire length of South Main Street fr

limits to Lakeport Boulevard during the five-year analysis period. None of these were sp



A d li i l h i di d b h 85th il i d b di i


18/76

19. South Main Street (City Limits Lakeport Boulevard) Site E




Main Street, a portion of Clear Lake Avenue, High Street, and Lakeshore Boulevard. Thstudy site 650 feet south of Peckham Lane is one of 3 sites selected to monitor the segm

city limits to Lakeshore Boulevard. The Critical Speed in this area was sampled at 40 M

Pace at 31-40 MPH, and 74 percent of the sample was found to be within the Pace. Traf

in this area are approximately 8,900 per day. Sight distance is generally good, although

constrained in some areas. . There were 6 reported accidents in the entire length of Sout

Street from the city limits to Lakeport Boulevard during the five-year analysis period. N

were speed related.



A speed limit lower than indicated by the 85th Percentile is warranted by conditions.

A speed limit of 35 MPH is recommended for this street segment to a point 575 fee

Lakeport Boulevard.

20. Martin Street (Bevins Street Main Street)


Martin Street is an arterial street which links Bevins Street and State Route 29 with Forb

and Main Street. The spot speed study location was selected to apply to the segment bet

Street and Main Street. Speed survey results indicate a Critical Speed of 35 MPH, a Pac

MPH, and 75 percent of the sample within the Pace. Roadway width varies from 24 feet

Traffic volumes are moderate, at approximately 2,400 vehicles per day. Two accidents w

reported on this street during the analysis period. Neither were speed-related.

This segment of Martin Street is characterized by an open ditch on the south side, poor i

sight distance, on-street parking, discontinuous pedestrian facilities, and poor pavementA speed limit lower than indicated by the 85th Percentile is warranted by conditions.

A speed limit of 30 MPH is recommended for Martin Street between Main Street and B

21. Martin Street (City Limits Bevins Street)


Martin Street is an arterial street which links Bevins Street and State Route 29 with Forb

and Main Street. The spot speed study location was selected to apply to that portion of M

from the city limits to Bevins Street. Spot speed survey results indicate that the Critical

MPH, the Pace is 31-40 MPH, and 49 percent of the sample is in the Pace. Traffic volum

to moderate, at 680 vehicles per day. The street width varies from 24 to 34 feet in rolling

Sight distance is restricted in some locations, especially near the junction of Bevins Stre

accidents were reported on this street during the analysis period.


19/76

A speed limit of 40 MPH is recommended for this segment of Martin Street.

22. Mellor Drive



Mellor Drive is a collector street which penetrates a developing residential area north of

The spot speed survey site between 15th Street and 16th Street is intended to represent th

street. Survey results indicate a Critical Speed of 32 MPH, a Pace of 21-30 MPH, and sh

percent of the sample was within the Pace. This street is characterized by a very steep v

horizontal curvature, and relatively narrow widths. Traffic volumes are approximately 1

vehicles per day. There were no reported accidents on this street during the analysis per

The steep vertical curvature makes it difficult for vehicles to maintain a constant speed,

Mellor penetrates a residential area. A speed limit lower than indicated by the 85th Perce

warranted by conditions.

A speed limit of 25 MPH is recommended for Mellor Drive.

23. Parallel Drive (Lakeport Boulevard North of Craig)


Parallel Drive is a frontage road to State Route 29 that functions as one of the citys arteextends from a State Route 175 to north of Lakeport Boulevard. The segment represente

speed survey site (120 feet north of Westside Park Road), extends from Lakeport Boule

end of improvements north of Craig Avenue. A Critical Speed of 38 MPH, Pace of 26-3

percent in pace of 45 were measured for this segment. Average daily traffic was monito

vehicles per day. Adjacent land continues to develop; therefore volumes are expected to

No accidents were reported on this street during the analysis period. The roadway width

somewhat constrained in an area of horizontal and vertical curvature north and south of

Boulevard.

The prevailing speeds indicate that an appropriate speed limit of 40 mph, or possibly 35

be appropriate for this segment of Parallel Drive. The new Mendocino College Lakepor

planned for construction on the southerly segment of Parallel Drive in 2012. Since the e

campus is located within this segment and the campus will be relocated to a southerly se

Parallel Drive, traffic characteristics of the entire street are likely to change when classe

the new site.

A speed limit of 30 MPH is recommended to be retained for this segment of Paralle

is further recommended that Parallel Drive in its entirety be re-surveyed within six

opening classes at the new Mendocino College Lakeport Campus site.

24. Parallel Drive (old City Limit Lakeport Boulevard)


ll l i i f d S 29 h f i f h i


20/76

This segment is un-posted and transitions into the un-posted (and presumed to be 55 MP

that was recently annexed by the City. The new Mendocino College Lakeport Campus i

for construction to the south of this segment in 2012. When open for classes, the traffic

characteristics of Parallel Drive will be changed. This particular segment of Parallel Drirelatively short segment. It has a history of being monitored separately because it encom

segment south of Lakeport Boulevard to the former southerly Lakeport City Limits. No

Parallel Drive is within the City of Lakeport, the relevancy of this particular segment in

overall speed zoning for Parallel Drive between S.R. 175 and Lakeport Boulevard is que

The prevailing speeds on this segment suggest a reasonable speed limit of 45 mph to 50

be appropriate. The newly acquired segment to the south remains non-posted, although i

reviewed for the City for the first time within this study. Since significant land use chan

pending that are likely to affect all of Parallel Drive, it is recommended the entire street

surveyed within six months after the new college site is open for classes and that no cha

made to the existing speed limit at this time.

A speed limit of 35 MPH is recommended for this segment of Parallel Drive. It is f

recommended that Parallel Drive in its entirety be re-surveyed within six months o

classes at the new Mendocino College Lakeport Campus site.

25. Parallel Drive (State Route 175 old City Limit)

Volume: 1000 vpd 85th P: 55 mph Pace: 41-50 mph Existing S.L.: N

Parallel Drive is a frontage road to State Route 29 that functions as one of the citys arte

extends from State Route 175 to north of Lakeport Boulevard. The segment represented

speed study site (at new college site), extends from State Route 175 to the previous sout

Limit. A Critical Speed of 55 MPH, Pace of 41-50 MPH, and percent on pace of 50 wer

within this segment. Width is approximately 34 feet, with 8 foot shoulders on the west s

foot shoulders on the east side. Terrain is generally flat except where horizontal and ver

are necessary near both termini. Traffic volumes were monitored at 1,000 vehicles per d

non-speed related accident of unknown circumstances was reported for this segment witanalysis period.

This segment is of Parallel Drive was recently annexed into the City of Lakeport system

speed zoned when it was a county maintained road. The new Mendocino College Lakep

is planned for construction within this segment in 2012. When open for classes, the traff

characteristics of all of Parallel Drive will likely be changed.

The prevailing speeds on this segment suggest a reasonable speed limit of 55 mph woul

appropriate. This is the appropriate speed for non-posted two-lane highways that are not

identified residential or business zones. Since significant land use changes are pending t

likely to affect all of Parallel Drive, it is recommended the entire street be re-surveyed w

months after the new college site is open for classes and that no changes be made to the

speed limit at this time.

It is recommended that this segment of Parallel Drive remain non-posted.It is furt

i i i i i i i


21/76

26. 6th Street



Sixth Street functions as an east-west collector street in central Lakeport between Spurr

Forbes Street. A speed study location between North Brush Street and Cherry Street warepresent Sixth Street between Spurr and Main Street. Analysis of the speed study data

Critical Speed of 26 MPH, a Pace of 16-25 MPH, and percent of vehicles in pace of 67 p

Traffic columns are light (410 vehicles per day) and the roadway width is generally only

There is curb and gutter in some areas, but shoulders are generally lacking. The area is a

area in rolling topography. Stops are required at Manzanita, Brush, Forbes, and Main. A

inhibits width along one segment of this street. Two accidents were reported for 6th Stre

analysis period. Neither were speed-related.

A speed limit of 25 MPH is recommended for this segment of 6th

Street.

27. 11th Street (Pool Street North Main Street)


Eleventh Street is one of Lakeports two primary east-west arterials. It extends from the

limits to North Main Street. Volumes are very high, monitored at 8,400 vehicles per day

segment. The spot speed study conducted between North Tunis and North Brush is inten

represent the segment of 11th Street between Pool Street and North Main Street. Analysi

results of the survey shows a Critical Speed of 34 MPH, a Pace of 26-35 MPH, and 79 psampled vehicles within the pace. Eleventh Street is 32 feet wide, accommodating two t

and parking on the north side. Curb and gutter are installed the length of the segment. D

frequent and sight distance is generally poor at the frequent intersections. There were 11

accidents on this segment during the analysis period. They were not concentrated in any

Three of the accidents were speed-related.

This segment of 11th Street is particularly narrow with discontinuous and narrow pedestr

facilities, no bicycle lanes, obscured intersections, and tight radii on intersecting streets.

limit lower than indicated by the 85

th

Percentile is warranted by conditions.


Street.

28. 11th Street (1100 feet west of Mellor - Pool Street)



limits to North Main Street. Volumes are very high, monitored at 11,500 vehicles per da

segment. The spot speed study conducted 600 feet west of Mellor is intended to represe

segment of 11th

Street between Pool Street and 1100 feet west of Mellor Drive. Analysi

results of the survey shows a Critical Speed of 36 MPH, a Pace of 26-35 MPH, and 62 p

sampled vehicles within the pace. Eleventh Street is 32 feet wide, accommodating two t

and parking on the north side. Curb and gutter are installed the length of the segment. D

frequent and sight distance is generally poor at the frequent intersections. There were 6 r

id hi d i h l i i d d l d


22/76

29. 11th Street (City Limit 1100 feet west of Mellor)




limits (joining Scotts Valley Road) to North Main Street. Volumes are very high, monit10,800 vehicles per day within this segment. The spot speed study location at 350 feet e

Central Park Avenue was selected to represent the segment of 11th Street between 1100

Mellor Drive and the western city limits. Results indicate a Critical Speed of 40 MPH, a

40 MPH, and 76 percent of sampled vehicles in pace. Street width on this segment is va

48 feet. Turning movements are frequent because of the adjacent shopping in this segme

were 3 accidents reported on this street segment during the analysis period. One was spe

This segment of 11th Street is impacted by high traffic volumes and multiple turning mo

to the high level of adjacent commercial activity. There are discontinuous pedestrian fac

lanes, two through lanes, and freeway ramp access points in this segment. A speed limit

indicated by the 85th Percentile is warranted by conditions.


Street.

30. 16th

Street (Mellor Drive High Street)

Volume: 950 vpd 85th P: 30 mph Pace: 21-30 mph Existing: Not Po

Sixteenth Street functions as a collector between Mellor Drive and High Street. The sitethe spot speed study was between Orchid and Hartley. Analysis of data gathered at that

a Critical Speed of 30 MPH, a Pace of 21-30 MPH, and 70 percent of sampled vehicles

the pace. Traffic volumes are moderate, approximately 1,100 vehicles per day. Street wi

feet, which frequently accommodates on-street parking. No accidents have been reporte

review period. The current speed limit is not posted in the street segment.




31. 20th Street (Hartley Street High Street)

Volume: 1450 vpd 85th P: 31 mph Pace: 21-30 mph Existing; 25 mp

Twentieth Street is a collector street which provided continuity between Hartley Street a

Street/Lakeshore Boulevard. Approximately 1,450 vehicles per day use this segment of

The spot speed study conducted between Hartley and North High Street revealed a Criti

31 MPH, a pace of 21-30 MPH, and 72 percent of the sample was within the pace. Road

is 38 feet, which accommodates two through lanes and on-street parking on the south si

distance is generally good. No accidents have been reported during the review period. S

required at both Lakeshore/High and at Hartley

Adjacent land use is residential, but pedestrian facilities are discontinuous and pavemen

poor. A speed limit lower than indicated by the 85th Percentile is warranted by conditio


23/76

32. 20th Street (Alden Avenue Hartley Street)


P: 34 mph Pace: 26-35 Existing S.L.: 2

The westerly extension of 20th Street is a newer collector which serves the developing re

area in northwest Lakeport. Although the westernmost end of this street is currently unddevelopment, the easternmost segment lies within a fully developed residential area. Cu

volumes are low, at approximately 440 vehicles per day, but are expected to increase wi

development. Results of the spot speed survey indicate a critical speed of 34 MPH, a Pa

MPH, and 65 percent of the sample within the pace. One accident was reported on this s

during the review period. It was not speed-related.

This segment of 20th Street is characterized by adjacent residential development, on-stre

and discontinuous pedestrian facilities. A speed limit lower than indicated by the 85th P

warranted by conditions.


Street.


24/76

Recommendation chart


25/76

IV. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS

Recommendations for surveyed Lakeport city streets are as follows:

1. Armstrong Street (Berry Street to Forbes Street):Critical Speed: 30; Pace: 21-30; Existing S.L.: NP

Armstrong Street is a collector in the Lakeport street system. Although A

Street is currently not posted, the area which it bisects would certainly quResidence District per the California Vehicle Code. A prima facie spee

25 mph would apply. Prevailing speeds are consistent with a 25 mph zone

It is recommended that a speed limit of 25 mph be established for this zon

street meets the definition of Residence District in the California Vehicle

qualifies for posting as a prima facie 25 mph zone. It is recommended thasigns be posted and this street be removed from the speed zone review pr

2. Bevins Street (Bevins Court to Martin Street):Critical Speed: 35; Pace: 26-35; Existing S.L.: 30 mph

Bevins Street is a collector in the Lakeport street system. Bevins Street wconstructed with a steep vertical curve that somewhat obscures driveway

approaches. There is also a junction with Bevins Court at the crest of the

These are conditions present that may not be readily apparent to the prude

It is recommended that the existing speed limit of 30 mph be retained.

3. Bevins Street (Lakeport Boulevard to Bevins Court):Critical Speed: 35; Pace: 26-35; Existing S.L.: 30 mph

Bevins Street is a collector in the Lakeport street system. Bevins Street w

constructed with a steep vertical curve that somewhat obscures driveway

approaches. There is also a junction with Bevins Court at the crest of theThese are conditions present that may not be readily apparent to the prude



26/76


5. Forbes Street (Sixth Street to Clear Lake Avenue):Critical Speed: 32; Pace: 21-30; Existing S.L.: 30 mph

Forbes Street functions as an arterial street in the Lakeport system. It was

repaved which may account for the slight change in critical speed from th

survey.


6. Giselman Street (Lakeshore Boulevard to Lange Street):Critical Speed: 29; Pace: 21-30; Existing S.L.: NP

Giselman is a collector in the Lakeport street system. Giselman Street wa

constructed with a steep vertical curve on an approach to a school zone. T

also a three-way stop near the crest at the junction of Hillcrest Drive. Althcritical speed is 29, speeds in this area are somewhat skewed by vehicles

accelerating up the grade and gaining extra speed down the grade. As this

bisects a residential area and includes a school zone at the north end, it woappropriate to post a 25 mph speed zone on this un-posted street.

This street meets the definition of Residence District in the California VeCode and qualifies for posting as a prima facie 25 mph zone. It is recomm

that 25 mph signs be posted and this street be removed from the speed zoprogram.

7. Hartley Street (Clear Lake Avenue to Twentieth Street):Critical Speed: 36; Pace: 26-35; Existing S.L.: 30 mph

Hartley Street is a collector street in the Lakeport street system.


8. Hartley Street (Twentieth Street to City Limit):


27/76

apparent to the prudent driver. Speed zoning guidelines (established recen

California Committee on Traffic Control Devices) have removed discreti

transportation professionals to recommend speed limits more than 5 mph

indicated by the Critical Speed.

It is recommended that the speed limit be established at 35. It is also

recommended that this segment of street be assigned medium priority for zone enforcement.

9. High Street (Eleventh Street to Lakeshore Boulevard):Critical Speed: 35; Pace: 26-35; Existing S.L.: 30 mph

High Street is an arterial in the Lakeport street system. It is a componentmajor north-south arterial that also includes South Main Street, North Ma

Clear Lake Avenue, and Lakeshore Boulevard.


10.Lakeport Boulevard (Todd Road to Main Street):Critical Speed: 33; Pace: 26-35; Existing S.L.: 30 mph

Lakeport Boulevard is a major east-west arterial in the Lakeport street sy

connects Parallel Drive and State Route 29 with downtown Lakeport and

Street.


11.Lakeshore Boulevard (High Street to Lange Street):Critical Speed: 35; Pace: 26-35; Existing S.L.: 30 mph

Lakeshore Boulevard is an arterial in the Lakeport street system. It is a c

of the major north-south arterial that also includes South Main Street, No

Street, Clear Lake Avenue, and High Street.



28/76


13.Lange Street (Lakeshore Boulevard to Forest Drive):Critical Speed: 22; Pace: 16-25; Existing S.L.: 20 mph

Lange Street is a collector in the Lakeport street system that is the primarto the schools complex (elementary, middle school and high school). It i

short street that is impacted heavily by school pedestrian, bicycle, and veh

traffic. California Vehicle Code Section 22358.4 permits a decrease of spschools or senior centers to 20 or 15 based on an engineering and traffic s


14.North Main Street (First Street to North High Street, includes arteriasegment of Clear Lake Avenue):

Critical Speed: 30; Pace: 21-30; Existing S.L.: 30 mph

North Main Streetis an arterial in the Lakeport street system. It is a comof the major north-south arterial that also includes South Main Street, Cle

Avenue, High Street, and Lakeshore Boulevard.


15.South Main Street (575 south of Lakeport Boulevard to First Street)Site A: Critical Speed: 29; Pace: 21-30; Existing S.L.: 30 mphSite B: Critical Speed: 32; Pace: 26-35; Existing S.L.: 30 mph

South Main Streetis an arterial in the Lakeport street system. It is a com

of the major north-south arterial that also includes North Main Street, CleAvenue, High Street, and Lakeshore Boulevard. The 2011 survey collecte

data at two sites (Site A & Site B) to represent this segment of South Mai


16.South Main Street (City Limit to 575 south of Lakeport Boulevard):C. Critical Speed: 39; Pace: 31-40; Existing S.L.: 35 mph


29/76

It is recommended that the existing speed limit of 35 mph be retained on

segment.

17.Martin Street (Bevins Street to South Main Street):Critical Speed: 35; Pace: 26-35; Existing S.L.: 30 mph

Martin Street is an arterial in the Lakeport street system.

It is recommended that the existing speed limit of 30 mph on this segmenretained.

18.Martin Street (City Limit to Bevins Street)Critical Speed: 43; Pace: 31-40; Existing S.L.: 35 mph

Martin Street is an arterial in the Lakeport street system. This segment is transitional zone between the County maintained segment (40 mph) and t

easterly (30 mph) segment.Speed zoning guidelines (established recently

California Committee on Traffic Control Devices) have removed discretitransportation professionals to recommend speed limits more than 5 mph

indicated by the Critical Speed.

It is recommended that the speed limit on this segment be established at 4

is also recommended that this segment of street be assigned medium prior

speed zone enforcement.

19.Mellor Drive (Eleventh Street to Sixteenth Street):Critical Speed: 32; Pace: 21-30; Existing S.L.: 25 mph

Mellor Street is a collector street in the Lakeport street system that servesresidential area.


20.Parallel Drive (Lakeport Boulevard to Craig Avenue):Critical Speed: 38; Pace: 26-35; Existing S.L.: 30 mph


30/76

21.Parallel Drive (Old City Limit to Lakeport Boulevard):Critical Speed: 48; Pace: 36-45; Existing S.L.: 35 mph

Parallel Drive is an arterial in the Lakeport street system. This segment is

northerly extension of the State Route 29 frontage road that was formerlyCounty jurisdiction. This segment had been previously surveyed because

transitioned into the non-posted County maintained segment to the south.

in traffic patterns are expected in 2012.

It is recommended that the existing speed limit of 35 mph be retained. It irecommended that all segments of Parallel Drive be re-surveyed within 6

the completion of the new Mendocino College campus on south Parallel

22.Parallel Drive (State Route 175 to Old City Limit):Critical Speed: 55; Pace: 41-50; Existing S.L.: Not Posted

Parallel Drive is an arterial in the Lakeport street system. This segment issoutherly component of the State Route 29 frontage road that was formerl

County jurisdiction. This is the first time it has been surveyed as a Lakepo

Changes in traffic patterns are expected in 2012 with the construction of tMendocino College campus adjacent to this segment.

It is recommended that the existing speed limit of 35 mph be retained. It irecommended that all segments of Parallel Drive be re-surveyed within 6

the completion of the new Mendocino College campus on south Parallel

23.Sixth Street (Spurr Street to North Main Street):Critical Speed: 26; Pace: 16-25; Existing S.L.: 25 mph

Sixth Street is a collector in the Lakeport street system serving a resident


24.Eleventh Street (Pool Street to North Main Street):Critical Speed: 34; Pace: 26-35; Existing S.L.: 30 mph


31/76

25.Eleventh Street (1100 feet west of Mellor Drive to Pool Street):Critical Speed: 36; Pace: 26-35; Existing S.L.: 30 mph

Eleventh Street is an arterial in the Lakeport street system. It is a major earoute that links Scotts Valley Road and State Route 29 with downtown L

and provides direct access to major commercial areas as well as residenti

It is recommended that the existing speed limit of 30 mph on this segmen

retained. It is further recommended that this segment be considered a me

priority candidate for speed zone enforcement.

26.Eleventh Street (City Limit to 1100 feet west of Pool Drive):Critical Speed: 40; Pace: 31-40; Existing S.L.: 35 mph

Eleventh Street is an arterial in the Lakeport street system. It is a major ea

route that links Scotts Valley Road and State Route 29 with downtown Land provides direct access to major commercial areas as well as residenti

This particular segment is in a transitional area between commercial area

the east, State Route 29 ramps, and continuation into County-maintained Valley Road, which is posted at 35 mph.


27.Sixteenth Street (North High Street to Mellor Drive):Critical Speed: 30; Pace: 21-30; Existing S.L.: NP

Sixteenth Street is a collector street in the Lakeport street system that servresidential area. There is no posted speed limit, however the residential n

this area would indicate a 25 mph limit is appropriate..

This street meets the definition of Residence District in the California Ve

Code and qualifies for posting as a prima facie 25 mph zone. It is recomm

that 25 mph signs be posted and this street be removed from the speed zo

program.

28.Twentieth Street (North High Street to Hartley Street):Critical Speed: 31; Pace: 21-30; Existing S.L.: 25 mph


32/76


29.Twentieth Street (Hartley Street to Alden Avenue):Critical Speed: 34; Pace: 26-35; Existing S.L.: 25 mph

Twentieth Street is a collector in the Lakeport street system. It serves as aresidential areas to the west as well as north via Hartley Street. This segm

Twentieth Street serves a developing residential area in northwest Lakepo

posted speed should more closely correspond to the prevailing speeds on

It is recommended that the speed limit on this segment be established at 3


33/76

CITY OF LAK


34/76

CITY OF LAK


STAFF REPORT

RE: Two Hour Parking Adjacent to City Hall MEETING DAT

SUBMITTED BY: Scott Harter, City Engineer



The Council is being asked to adopt the proposed Resolution designating the north side ofbetween Park Street and a location 115 feet west of Park Street (located at the alley) as Two

BACKGROUND:At a previous meeting the City Manager initiated a discussion regarding the parking arounddesire to see quicker turn over on space availability. Options explored were restricting the Street, Second Street, or a combination thereof. Further discussions at a staff level determeasiest to implement and enforce would be to limit the parking restrictions to one street. Pparking restrictions on Second Street provides a natural location in the alley to delineate thof restricted parking. The proposed resolution results in six parking spaces which are currbeing converted to Two-Hour parking.

DISCUSSION:

The proposed resolution is consistent with the direction provided by Council at the previoit limits about five spaces and provides a easily identifiable location for that demarcation asentrance. Council can, if desired, provide further refinement to the proposed resolution

OPTIONS:

Adopt the proposed resolution adding the specified area as a designated Two Hour Parkinprovide further direction to staff regarding the proposed Resolution.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None $400 Account Number:

RESOLUTION NO. _____ (2011)


35/76

( )

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITYLAKEPORT DESIGNATING THOSE SPECIFIC PLACEWHEREPARKING SHALL BE LIMITED TO TWO (2)

CONSECUTIVE HOURS BETWEEN 6:00 A.M. AND 6:00 POF ANY DAY EXCEPT SUNDAYS AND HOLIDAYS

BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lakeport that Resolution 239Resolution 2334 (2008) and Resolution 2048 (2001) having effect under the provisions of Artic11 of Ordinance No. 356 (58) as amended by Ordinances Nos. 578 (79) and 795 (98) are herebtheir entirety;

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lakeport pursuProvisions of Article II, Section 11 of Ordinance No. 356 (58) as amended by Ordinance Nos. 795 (98) the following locations be designated as Two-Hour Parking Zones with parking limitebetween the hours of 6 a.m. and 6 p.m., Sundays and holidays excepted:

1. Second Street along the south side from Park Street to Forbes Street;2. Second Street along the north side from Park Street to 115 feet west of Park Str3. Second Street along the north side from Main Street to Brush Street;4. Third Street along the south side from Park Street to Forbes Street;5. Third Street along the north side from Park Street to Forbes Street;6. Fourth Street along the south side from Main Street to Forbes Street;7. Fifth Street along the south side from Main Street to Forbes Street;8. Forbes Street along the west side from Second Street to Seventh Street;9. Forbes Street along the east side from First Street to Sixth Street;10. Main Street along the west side from Armstrong Street to Sixth Street;11. Main Street along the east side from 150 feet south of Martin Street to 100 feet

Street;

12. The city parking lot located at the southwest corner of Third Street and Park Strknown as Assessors Parcel Number 025-411-02, address 75 Third Street;

13. Main Street along the west side from Campbell Lane to Industrial Avenue.THIS RESOLUTION was passed by the City Council of the City of Lakeport at a r

thereof on the 20th day of September, 2011, by the following vote:

AYES:NOES:

CITY OF LAK


36/76

CITY OF LAK


STAFF REPORT

RE: Contract for Business Loan Administration MEETING DAT

SUBMITTED BY: Richard Knoll, CDD/Redevelopment Director



The City Council is being asked to authorize a contract with Community Development Serloan administration and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract.

BACKGROUND:

In May the City Council authorized the issuance of an RFP for business loan consultants, aDevelopment Services (CDS) was the only respondent.

With CDS being the only consultant to respond to the RFP, it was necessary to obtain solefrom HCD, which has now come through. Attached is a copy of the CDS proposal to proadministrative and activity delivery services for the City Business Loan Program at $125 pe

DISCUSSION:

CDS has provided loan underwriting and administrative services to the City for several yeaproven track record of knowledge and capability.

OPTIONS:

Approve contract or give further direction to staff.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None $125.00 per hour Account Number:Comments: Payment to the consultant is paid out of Grant administrative and activity de

SUGGESTED MOTIONS:

Move to approve CDS for the City Business Loan Program delivery and general administr


37/76


38/76


39/76


40/76


41/76


42/76


43/76


44/76


45/76


46/76


47/76


48/76


49/76


50/76

CITY OF LAK


51/76


STAFF REPORT

RE: Resolution to Continue City Participation in AbandonedVehicle Abatement Service Authority

MEETING DATE

SUBMITTED BY: Andrew Britton, Planning Services Manager


WHAT IS BEING ASKED OF THE CITY COUNCIL:

The Council is being asked to adopt a proposed Resolution which will allow the City to conparticipation in the Lake County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Service Authority (AVAS

BACKGROUND:

In October of 1991 the City of Lakeport entered into a Joint Powers Agreement with the Cand City of Clearlake to create an agency known as the Lake County Abandoned Vehicle AAuthority (AVASA). The purpose of this authority was to establish a program for the abaabandoned and nuisance vehicles under the jurisdiction of a service authority as provided fVehicle Code Section 22710. The AVASA is governed by a commission consisting of twoCounty Board of Supervisors and one member from the City Council of each city. Counci

Rumfelt is the City's current member.

Subsequent to the establishment of the AVASA, the City adopted Ordinance No. 769 (MuChapter 8.35) which prohibits the accumulation/storage of abandoned or nuisance vehicleprivate property in the City.

The AVASA program is funded by a $1.00 fee that is added to all vehicle registration bills fCounty. Funds are collected by the State and disbursed to the AVASA who provides the Cproportionate share. The City Council approved Resolutions in 1991 (No. 1699) and 2001

which were needed in order for the $1.00 fee to be collected on behalf of the AVASA progNo. 2088 extended the collection of the vehicle registration fee until April 30, 2012.

The City has been notified that the adoption of a new Resolution by the City Council is reqthe AVASA program to be continued. Please see the attached notice from the DepartmenVehicles Sections 9250 7 and 22710 of the California Vehicle Code provide for the establ

DISCUSSION:

Adoption of the proposed Resolution will allow the City to continue with its abandoned/nabatement program for an additional ten years


52/76

abatement program for an additional ten years.

Community Development Department records indicate that 286 abandoned and nuisance been abated in the City of Lakeport since 2000. The Finance Department reports that $43

collected since late 1999 from the AVASA reimbursement program to offset expenses relavehicle abatement activities.

The following table illustrates the number of vehicle abatement cases that have been invoicsince the year 2000. It is important to emphasize that staff initiates more vehicle abatemenactually invoiced. Some vehicles are abated after the City initiates an investigation but befoabatement action is taken, including tagging the vehicles and contacting the registered ownof the vehicle abatement cases are initiated by a citizen complaint but staff also pursues the

flagrant violations in the absence of a complaint.

OPTIONS:

FISCAL IMPACT:

None $Expenses and revenues vary depending on the program activities. Sinprogram fund has a surplus of $5,797.14. Account Number: 928.002


53/76

program fund has a surplus of $5,797.14. Account Number: 928.002

SUGGESTED MOTIONS:

Move that the City Council approve the proposed Resolution which will allow the Citys coparticipation in the Lake County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Service Authority (AVAS

Attachments: Proposed ResolutionAVA Program: DMV Renewal Notice 2011

RESOLUTION NO. ______ (2011)


54/76

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THECITY OF LAKEPORT EXTENDING THE REGISTRATIO

FEE/SERVICE FEE FOR THE ABANDONED VEHICLABATEMENT PROGRAM IN THE CITY OF LAKEPOR

WHEREAS, Resolution No. 1699 (91), adopted by the City of Lakeport on A1991, established the City of Lakeport Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Service Authoriimposed a vehicle abatement registration fee of one dollar ($1.00) per vehicle in the Citto be used as a service fee to establish and maintain an Abandoned Vehicle Abatement

the Service Authority, pursuant to Sections 22710 and 9250.7 of the California VehicleWHEREAS, Resolution No. 2088 (01), adopted by the City of Lakeport on N

2001, extended the sunset date for the City of Lakeport Abandoned Vehicle Abatemena period of ten (10) years, to April 30, 2012; and

WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code section 9250.7(h) authorizes the vehicle registration fee of one dollar ($1.00) per vehicle to be imposed by a service authority onperiod of 10 years from the date that the collection of the fee commenced, provided, h

the fee may be extended in increments of up to 10 years by two-thirds vote of the CouSupervisors and a majority of the cities having a majority of the incorporated populatioCounty adopting resolutions providing for the extension of the fee; and

WHEREAS, the City of Lakeport fee is due to sunset on April 30, 2012, beingafter the collection of said fee was extended and it is therefore necessary for the City Capprove and adopt an extension of said fee pursuant to the California Vehicle Code; an

WHEREAS, vehicles abandoned on public and private property continue to cconditions and it is increasingly difficult for the City to sufficiently fund programs to ababandoned vehicle nuisances.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the Citythat the vehicle registration/service fee of one dollar ($1.00) per vehicle for LakeportsVehicle Abatement Program, authorized by Sections 9250.7 and 22710 of the Vehicle Chereby extended for a period of ten (10) years, to April 30, 2022.

The foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of thon the 20th day of September, 2011, by the following vote:

AYES:NOES:ABSTAINING:ABSENT:


55/76

CITY OF LAK

Lakeport Redevelop


56/76


STAFF REPORT

RE: Delegate Voting Direction for AnnualLeague of California Cities Conference

MEETING DAT

SUBMITTED BY: Janel Chapman, City Clerk



The City Council is being asked to provide direction to its designated voting delegate and aannual business meeting at the League of California Cities Conference.

BACKGROUND:

The League of California Cities holds an annual conference every year at which time they hbusiness meeting. At that annual business meeting member cities are asked to give directioby voting on a number of resolutions. These resolutions are presented to the policy commprovide a recommendation to the General Resolutions Committee. The recommended acconsent agenda for consideration by the general assembly. Any voting delegate may make resolution from the consent agendas in order to request the opportunity for debate.

DISCUSSION:

Six resolutions will be considered at the annual business meeting to be held on Friday, SepThe resolutions include:

1. A resolution supporting alternative methods of meeting public notice requirements anrevisions to the Government Code recognizing alternative methods as a means to meerequirements.

2. A resolution relating to tort reform.3. A resolution relating to raising public awareness about the imminent health and safety

bullied children.

4. A resolution supporting the Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None $ Account Number: Comments:

SUGGESTED MOTIONS


57/76

SUGGESTED MOTIONS:

Move to provide direction to the City's voting delegates to either support/disapprove the p

resolutions based upon the recommendations of the League policy committees.

Attachments: League of California Cities Annual Conference Resolutions Packe


58/76


59/76


60/76


61/76


62/76


63/76


64/76


65/76


66/76


67/76


68/76


69/76


70/76


71/76


72/76


73/76


74/76


75/76


76/76

Documents

092011 Lakeport City Council - Council Business