Upload
archibald-dennis
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Soil Vapor Extraction Limitations and Enhancements
LeeAnn Racz
AgE 558
Semester Project
April 2001
2
Outline
• Theory– SVE Mass Removal Performance– Gas Extraction Methods
• Application– Limitations to SVE– Enhancements to SVE
• Remaining Uncertainties/Challenges
3
Theory
• Removes soil gas under vacuum from soil matrix
• Mass transfers from aqueous and sorbed phases to gas phase in order to re-establish equilibrium
• Model assumes mass transfer between gas and solid phases occurs via continuous film of water (wetting fluid)
4
Water/Solid Partitioning (Desorption)
Advecting Air
Air/Water Partitioning (Volatilization)
Dissolved Contaminant Sorbed Contaminant
Soil Moisture
Mass Transfer Processes in the Vadose Zone (Armstrong et al. 1994)
Soil Grain
5
SVE Mass Removal Performance
• First Stage– Removes pure product– System in equilibrium– High off-gas concentrations– Relatively short duration– Henry’s law dominates– High organic content can have partitioning
between liquid and solid phases in equilibrium
6
SVE Mass Removal Performance
• Henry’s lawPi = HiCi
or
Hi = CwCa
where Pi = partial pressure in gas phase
Ci and Cw = concentration in aqueous phase
Hi = Henry’s law constant for phase partitioning of i
Ca = concentration in gas phase
7
SVE Mass Removal Performance• Partitioning between liquid and solid phases
– Expressed as linear Freundlich isotherm– Valid for soils with >0.1% organic carbon
Kd = Cs/Cw
and
Kd = foc/Koc
where Kd = distribution coefficient
Cs = concentration in sorbed phase
foc = mass fraction of organic carbon
Koc = organic carbon partitioning coefficient
8
SVE Mass Removal Performance
• Second Stage– Transition from first to third stages– System is in non-equilibrium– Quickly declining mass removal rates
9
SVE Mass Removal Performance
• Third Stage– Also in non-equilibrium– Partitioning between soil gas, soil moisture and
soil solids limit the mass transfer rate to mobile gas pathways
– Non-zero asymptote
10
SVE Mass Removal Performance• Non-equilibrium mass transfer (second and third
stages)– Rate limiting factors in mass transfer process
– Modeled as first-order kinetic mass transfer relationships
• Diffusive mass transfer between air and water driven by concentration gradient between average concentration in water phase and equilibrium concentration at water/air interface
• Kinetically limited desorption from soil grains to water phase
11
Gas Extraction Methods• Active
– Involves introducing fresh air into soil– Apply vacuum by mechanical means to draw soil gas
from soil matrix
• Passive– Screened well installed– Open to atmosphere– Gas flows from soil matrix out through open well when
subsurface gas pressure greater than barometric pressure
12
Limitations to SVE
• Well suited for:– Vapor removal from moist sand and granular
soils– Soils with increased gas permeability– Removing VOCs and LNAPLs
13
Limitations to SVE
• Not so well suited for:– Removing contaminants from capillary fringe
• Low relative permeability to soil gas flow makes diffusion the rate-limiting process
– Sites with high water tables– Mixed contamination
• Includes nonvolatile compounds and DNAPLs
– Sites without sufficient moisture• If too dry, increases sorption capacity of soil
14
Enhancements to SVE
• Synergistic Effects– Pump and treat ground water
• Leaves dewatered area treatable by SVE
– SVE vacuum produces air flow• Enhances effects of aerobic microbial activity
– Air sparging• Injects air into ground water and extracts volatile
portion to unsaturated zone
• Extracts gas and controls vapor migration
15
Enhancements to SVE• Soil Heating
– Increases volatility of contaminant to gas phase– Reduces mass transfer limitations in non-equilibrium
conditions– Useful for removing chlorinated compounds and
compounds with higher boiling points– Methods
• Hot air • Electrical heating• Microwave energy
16
Enhancements to SVE
• Pulse Pumping– Theory: turn off vacuum at tailed portion of
effluent curve and allow air phase concentrations to recover, then reapply vacuum
– Intended to give lower energy costs and effluent treatment costs
– However, slow but continuous pumping gives best performance
17
Enhancements to SVE• Passive SVE
– Cap well with check valve to prevent air from flowing into subsurface through well
• Lightweight ball in conical seat
• Solenoid valve
– Install surface cover around well • Prevents short-circuiting adjacent to well to increase horizontal
flow to well
• Prevents clean air from entering subsurface diluting contaminant concentrations
• Increases differential between surface and subsurface gas pressures
18
Remaining Uncertainties/Challenges
• Difficult to use in removing DNAPLs and other recalcitrant compounds
• Difficult to use in certain soil types– Low porosity– High moisture content– Capillary fringe
19
Remaining Uncertainties/Challenges
• Combine with other methods for synergistic effects
• Nonzero asymptotic characteristic of nonequilibrium
• Better measuring techniques to obtain data for better designs– Uncertainties in heterogeneous media– Otherwise, rely on further refined curve-fitted
models