56
13 - 1 06/27/22 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 104/19/23

Process Engineering

ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems

Spring 2011

Dr. R. A. Wysk

Page 2: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 204/19/23

PROCESS ENGINEERING

• Process planning is also called: manufacturing planning, process planning, material processing, process engineering, and machine routing.

• Which machining processes and parameters are to be used (as well as those machines capable of performing these processes) to convert (machine) a piece part from its initial form to a final form predetermined (usually by a design engineer) from an engineering drawing.

• The act of preparing detailed work instructions to produce a part.

• How to realize a given product design.

Page 3: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 304/19/23

PRODUCT REALIZATION

Product design

Process planning

Operation programming

Verification

Scheduling

Execution

Process,machineknowledge

Schedulingknowledge

Page 4: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 404/19/23

PROCESS PLANNING

Design MachineTool

Scheduling and Production Control

Process

Planning

Page 5: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 504/19/23

PROBLEMS FACING MANUFACTURING

INDUSTRYFact:Only 11% of the machine tools in the U.S. are programmable.

More than 53% of the metal-working plants in the U.S. do not have even one computer-controlled machine.

Some problems:Cannot justify the cost

Lack of expertise in using such machines

Too small a batch size to offset the planning and programming costs

Source: Kelley, M.R. and Brooks, H., The State of Computerized Automation in US Manufacturing, J.F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, October 1988.

Potential benefits in reducing turnaround time by using programmable machine tools have not been realized due to time, complexity and costs of planning and programming.

Page 6: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 604/19/23

DOMAIN

One-of-a-kind and Small batchObjectives: Lead-time, Cost

Approaches: process selection, use

existing facilities.

Mass productionObjective: Cost

Approaches: process design, optimization,

materials selection, facilities

design

Page 7: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 704/19/23

How do we process engineer?

• How can we make it?

• How much does it cost?

• How long will it take us to complete it?

• How reliable will it be?

• How can we recycle it

Page 8: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 804/19/23

How can we make it?

• Is this like something else that we’ve done?– Yes; What methods were used?

– No; Design a new process

Page 9: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 904/19/23

What methods were used?

• Machining methods

• Pressworking

• Welding/fabrication

• Casting

• Powder materials

• Layered deposition

• Others

Page 10: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 1004/19/23

Welding/fabrication:Additive techniques

Initial Stock

WeldAdd-on

WeldAdd-on

Final Product

Page 11: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 1104/19/23

Machining Methods:Subtractive techniques

Initial Stock

Slotting DrillingFinal Product

Page 12: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 1204/19/23

Casting:Form Methods

Page 13: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 1304/19/23

ENGINEERING DESIGN MODELING

10" +0.01-0.01

1'-4" +0.01-0.01

4" +0.01-0.01

7" +0.05-0.05

5" +0.01-0.01

3" +0.01-0.01

2" +0.01-0.01 0.001 A B

A

B

S.F. 64 u inch

U*

- *

CSG MODEL

Fa c e

Lo o p

Ed g e

V e rt e x

B-REP MODEL

Page 14: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 1404/19/23

INTERACTION OF PLANNING

FUNCTIONSGEOMETRIC REASONING

PROCESS SELECTION

CUTTER SELECTION

MACHINE TOOL SELECTION

SETUP PLANNING

FIXTURE PLANNING

CUTTER PATH GENERATION

• global & local geometry

• process capability• process cost

• available tools• tool dimension and geometry• geometric constraints

• machine availability, cost• machine capability

• feature relationship• approach directions• process constraints• fixture constraints

• fixture element function• locating, supporting, and clamping surfaces• stability

• feature merging and split• path optimization• obstacle and interference avoidance

Page 15: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 1504/19/23

PROCESS PLAN

• Also called : operation sheet, route sheet, operation planning summary, or another similar name.

• The detailed plan contains:

route

processes

process parameters

machine and tool selections

fixtures

• How detail the plan is depends on the application.

• Operation: a process

• Operation Plan (Op-plan): contains the description of an operation, includes tools, machines to be used, process parameters, machining time, etc.

• Op-plan sequence: Summary of a process plan.

Page 16: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 1604/19/23

EXAMPLE PROCESS PLANS

Route Sheet

Part No. S1243Part Name: Mounting Bracket

1. Mtl Rm2. Mill02 5 3. Drl01 44. Insp 1

workstation Time(min)

by: T.C. Chang

PROCESS PLAN ACE Inc.

Part No. S0125-FPart Name: HousingOriginal: S.D. Smart Date: 1/1/89Checked: C.S. Good Date: 2/1/89

Material: steel 4340Si

Changes: Date: Approved: T.C. Chang Date: 2/14/89

No. OperationDescription

Workstation Setup Tool Time(Min)

10 Mill bottom surface1 MILL01 see attach#1for illustration

Face mill6 teeth/4" dia

3 setup5 machining

20 Mill top surface MILL01 see attach#1 Face mill6 teeth/4" dia

2 setup6 machining

30 Drill 4 holes DRL02 set on surface1 twist drill1/2" dia2" long

2 setup3 machining

Detailed Process Plan

Oper. Routing Summary

Page 17: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 1704/19/23

FACTORS AFFECTING PROCESS

PLAN SELECTION• Shape

• Tolerance

• Surface finish

• Size

• Material type

• Quantity

• Value of the product

• Urgency

• Manufacturing system itself

• etc.

Page 18: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 1804/19/23

PROCESS PLANNING CLASSIFICATIONMANUAL

COMPUTER-AIDED

VARIANT

GT based

Computer aids for editing

Parameters selection

GENERATIVE

Some kind of decision logic

Decision tree/table

Artificial Intelligence

Objective-Oriented

Still experience based

AUTOMATIC

Design understanding

Geometric reasoning capability

Page 19: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 1904/19/23

REQUIREMENTS INMANUAL PROCESS

PLANNING• ability to interpret an engineering drawing.

• familiar with manufacturing processes and practice.

• familiar with tooling and fixtures.

• know what resources are available in the shop.

• know how to use reference books, such as machinability data handbook.

• able to do computations on machining time and cost.

• familiar with the raw materials.

• know the relative costs of processes, tooling, and raw materials.

Page 20: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 2004/19/23

INDUSTRIAL SOLUTION

10" +0.01-0.01

1'-4" +0.01-0.01

4" +0.01-0.01

7" +0.05-0.05

5" +0.01-0.01

3" +0.01-0.01

2" +0.01-0.01 0.001 A B

A

B

S.F. 64 u inch

PRODUCTCONCEPT

CAD

CAMCUTTER PATH

HUMAN - decision makingCOMPUTER - geometric computation, data handling

N0010 G70 G 90 T08 M06

N0020 G00 X2.125 Y-0.475 Z4.000 S3157

N0030 G01 Z1.500 F63 M03

N0040 G01 Y4.100

N0050 G01 X2.625

N0060 G01 Y1.375

N0070 G01 X3.000

N0080 G03 Y2.625 I3.000 J2.000

N0090 G01 Y2.000

N0100 G01 X2.625

N0110 G01 Y-0.100

N0120 G00 Z4.000 T02 M05

N0130 F9.16 S509 M06

N0140 G81 X0.750 Y1.000 Z-0.1 R2.100 M03

N0150 G81 X0.750 Y3.000 Z-0.1 R2.100

N0160 G00 X-1.000 Y-1.000 M30

.

Page 21: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 2104/19/23

PROCESS PLANNING STEPS• Study the overall shape of the part. Use this

information to classify the part and determine the type of workstation needed.

• Thoroughly study the drawing. Try to identify every manufacturing features and notes.

• If raw stock is not given, determine the best raw material shape to use.

• Identify datum surfaces. Use information on datum surfaces to determine the setups.

• Select machines for each setup.

• For each setup determine the rough sequence of operations necessary to create all the features.

Page 22: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 2204/19/23

PROCESS PLANNING STEPS

(continue)• Sequence the operations determined in the previous step.

• Select tools for each operation. Try to use the same tool for several operations if it is possible. Keep in mind the trade off on tool change time and estimated machining time.

• Select or design fixtures for each setup.

• Evaluate the plan generate thus far and make necessary modifications.

• Select cutting parameters for each operation.

• Prepare the final process plan document.

Page 23: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 2304/19/23

COMPUTER-AIDED PROCESS PLANNING

ADVANTAGES

1. It can reduce the skill required of a planner.

2. It can reduce the process planning time.

3. It can reduce both process planning and manufacturing cost.

4. It can create more consistent plans.

5. It can produce more accurate plans.

6. It can increase productivity.

Page 24: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 2404/19/23

WHY AUTOMATED PROCESS PLANNING

• Shortening the lead-time

• Manufacturability feedback

• Lowering the production cost

• Consistent process plans

Page 25: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 2504/19/23

PROCESS PLANNING

Machining featuresDesign

Workpiece SelectionProcess SelectionTool SelectionFeed, Speed SelectionOperation SequencingSetup PlanningFixturing PlanningPart Programming

Page 26: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 2604/19/23

VARIANT PROCESS PLANNING

Standardprocess plans &individualprocessplans

processplanediting

part coding

partfamilyformation

standardplanpreparation

part coding

partfamilysearch

processplanretrieval

finishedprocessplan

GROUP TECHNOLOGY BASED RETRIEVAL SYSTEM

Page 27: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 2704/19/23

PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH THE VARIANT APPROACH

1. The components to be planned are limited to similar components previously planned.

2. Experienced process planners are still required to modify the standard plan for the specific component.

3. Details of the plan cannot be generated.

4. Variant planning cannot be used in an entirely automated manufacturing system, without additional process planning.

Page 28: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 2804/19/23

ADVANTAGES OF THE VARIANT APPROACH

1. Once a standard plan has been written, a variety of components can be planned.

2. Comparatively simple programming and installation (compared with generative systems) is required to implement a planning system.

3. The system is understandable, and the planner has control of the final plan.

4. It is easy to learn, and easy to use.

Page 29: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 2904/19/23

GENERATIVE APPROACH

A system which automatically synthesizes a process plan for a new component.

(i) part description

(ii) manufacturing databases

(iii) decision making logic and algorithms

MAJOR COMPONENTS:

Page 30: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 3004/19/23

ADVANTAGES OF THE GENERATIVE APPROACH

1. Generate consistent process plans rapidly;

2. New components can be planned as easily as existing components;

3. It has potential for integrating with an automated manufacturing facility to provide detailed control information.

Page 31: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 3104/19/23

KEY DEVELOPMENTS

1. The logic of process planning must be identified and captured.

2. The part to be produced must be clearly and precisely defined in a computer-compatible format

3. The captured logic of process planning and the part description

Page 32: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 3204/19/23

PRODUCT REPRESENTATION

Geometrical information

Part shape

Design features

Technological information

Tolerances

Surface quality (surface finish, surface integrity)

Special manufacturing notes

Etc.

"Feature information"

Manufacturing features

e.g. slots, holes, pockets, etc.

Page 33: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 3304/19/23

INPUT REPRESENTATION SELECTION

• How much information is needed?

• Data format required.

• Ease of use for the planning.

• Interface with other functions, such as, part programming, design, etc.

• Easy recognition of manufacturing features.

• Easy extraction of planning information from the representation.

Page 34: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 3404/19/23

WHAT INPUT REPRESENTATIONS

GT CODE

Line drawing

Special language

Symbolic representation

Solid model

CSG

B-Rep

others?

Feature based model

Page 35: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 3504/19/23

SPECIAL LANGUAGE

10 CYLINDER/3,1/11 DFIT/K,5/12 CHAMFER/.2,2.6/20 CYLINDER/2.5,1.2/21 LTOL/+0.001,-0.001/

3

11.2

2.5

.2x2.6

K5

+.001-.001

AUTAP

Page 36: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 3604/19/23

CIMS/PRO REPRESENTATION

a1

a2 a3

a4

a5

a6

t

X

Y Z

sweep

direction

Page 37: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 3704/19/23

GARI REPRESENTATION

0 3.0

2.5

0 1.

X

Y3.0

F1

F2

F3

(F1 (type face) (direction xp) (quality 120))

(F2 (type face) (direction yp) (quality 64))

(F3 (type face) (direction ym) (quality rough))

(H1 (type countersunk-hole) (diameter 1.0)

(countersik-diameter 3.0)

(starting-from F2) (opening-into F3))

(distance H1 F1 3.0)

(countersink-depth F2 H1 0.5)

Page 38: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 3804/19/23

CONCEPT OF FEATUREManufacturing is "feature" based.

Feature:

1 a: the structure, form, or appearance esp. of a person

b: obs: physical beauty.

2 a: the makeup or appearance of the face or its parts

b: a part of the face: LINEAMENT

3: a prominent part or characteristic

4: a special attraction

Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary

Page 39: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 3904/19/23

FEATURES IN DESIGN AND

MANUFACTURINGA high level geometry which includes a set of connected geometries. Its meaning is dependent upon the application domain.

Boss

Pocket with an island

Design Feature vs Manufacturing Feature

Page 40: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 4004/19/23

DESIGN FEATURES

• For creating a shape

• For providing a function

Motion Slot feature

Page 41: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 4104/19/23

MANUFACTURING FEATURES

• For process selection

• For fixturing

End mill a slot

Drilling Round hole

Turning Rotational feature

End milling Plane surface,

Hole, profile, slot

pocket

Ball end mill Free form surface

Boring Cylindrical shell

Reaming Cylindrical shell

... ...

Manufacturing is feature based.

Page 42: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 4204/19/23

MANUFACTURING FEATURES (cont.)

?

Page 43: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 4304/19/23

DATA ASSOCIATED WITH DESIGN FEATURES

Mechanical Engineering Part Design

• Feature Type

• Dimension

• Location

• Tolerance

• Surface finish

• Function

A Slot

Page 44: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 4404/19/23

DATA ASSOCIATED WITH MANUFACTURING FEATURES

• Feature type

• Dimension

• Location

• Tolerance

• Surface finish

• Relations with other features

• Approach directions

Approach

Approach

° Feature classifications are not the same.

Page 45: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 4504/19/23

FEATURE RECOGNITION

Extract and decompose features from a geometric model.

• Syntactic pattern recognition

• State transition diagram and automata

• Decomposition

• Logic

• Graph matching

• Face growing

Page 46: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 4604/19/23

DIFFICULTIES OF FEATURE RECOGNITION

• Potentially large number of features.

• Features are domain and user specific.

• Lack of a theory in features.

• Input geometric model specific. Based on incomplete models.

• Computational complexity of the algorithms.

• Existing algorithms are limited to simple features.

Page 47: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 4704/19/23

DESIGN WITH MANUFACTURING FEATURES

Make the design process a simulation of the manufacturing process. Features are tool swept volumes and operators are manufacturing processes.

Design

Process Planning

Bar stock - Profile - Bore hole

Turn profile Drill holeBore hole

Page 48: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 4804/19/23

PROS AND CONS OF DESIGN WITH

MANUFACTURING FEATURES• Concurrent engineering - designers are forced

to think about manufacturing process.

• Simplify (eliminate) process planning.

• Hinder the creative thinking of designers.

• Use the wrong talent (designer doing process planning).

• Interaction of features affects processes.

Pros

Cons

Page 49: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 4904/19/23

BACKWARD PLANNING.

Bo rin g

D r i l l i n g

Mi l l i n g

Fin is h e dp a rt

Wo rkp ie c e

P l a n n i n g

M a c h i n i n g o p e r a t i o n

Page 50: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 5004/19/23

PROCESS KNOWLEDGE

REPRESENTATION• Predicate logic

• Production rules

• Semantic Nets

• Frames

• Object Oriented Programming

Page 51: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 5104/19/23

SOME RESEARCH ISSUES

• Part design representation: information contents, data format

• Geometric reasoning: feature recognition, feature extraction, tool approach directions, feature relations

• Process selection: backward planning, tolerance analysis, geometric capability, process knowledge, process mechanics

• Tool selection: size, length, cut length, shank length, holder, materials, geometry, roughing, and finishing tools

Page 52: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 5204/19/23

SOME RESEARCH ISSUES

(continue)• Fixture design: fixture element model, fixturing

knowledge modeling, stability analysis, friction/cutting force

• Tool path planning: algorithms for features, gauging and interference avoidance algorithms, automated path generation

• Software engineering issues: data structure, data base, knowledge base, planning algorithms, user interface, software interface

Page 53: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 5304/19/23

A FEATURE BASED DESIGN/PROCESS PLANNING

SYSTEM

Geometric Reasoning

Application-Specific Features (e.g. manufacturing features)

blind slot, through slot, step, etc.

approach direction, feed direction

feature relations: precedence and intersection type

Manufacturing-Oriented Design Features

hole, straight slot, T-slot, circular slot, pocket

counterbore, sculptured surface cavity

Principle:Provide designer with the freedom to describe shape -

avoid constraining manufacturing planning

or requiring detailed manufacturing knowledge.

Page 54: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 5404/19/23

SOME AUTOMATED PROCESS PLANNING EFFORTS

U. Mass, Dixon: Features-based design for manufacturing analysis of extrusions, castings, injection molding

ASU, Shah: Theory of features study for CAM-I; Feature-mapping shell

Stanford,Cutkosky: feature-based design, process planning, fixturing systems.

Helsinki, Mantyla: systems for design & process planning.

IBM, Rossignac:Editing & validation of feature models; MAMOUR system.

SDRC, Chung, GE, Simmons: Feature-based design and casting analysis.

NIST : Automated process planning

CAM-I, UTRC: XPS-2, generative process planning

U of Maryland, Nau: Semi-generative process planning

GE R & D, Hines: Art to Part

Penn State, Wysk (Texas A&M): graph based process planning

Stanford, Cutkosky: FirstCut, integrated design and manufacturing system based on features.

CMI & CMU: IMW, feature based design, expert operation planning.

U. of Twente, Holland, Kals: PARTS , feature based input, feature recognition, operation planning.

Allied Bendix, Hummel & Brooks: XCUT system for cavity operation planning.

IPK Berlin & IPK Aachen

UMIST, B.J. Davies

U. of Leeds, de Pennington

U. of Tokyo, Kimura

Features in Process PlanningFeature in Design

QTC is one of the only efforts that considers design through inspection and the only one that uses deep geometric reasoning to link design and process planning.

Page 55: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 5504/19/23

SOME APPROACHESCAD

CAM

2-D Drafting

Process Planner

• automatic drawing interpretation• gen. type plan generation

Automatic part programming

3-D Solid Model

canned/auto. cutter path cycle

Feature based solid model

automatic part programming

• feature refinement • limited geometric reasoning • generative planning • seq may dictated by design

2-D Drafting

• drawing interpretation• variant type plan generation • interactive part programming

NC control

3-D CAD Model

• interactive drawing interpretation • gen./variant type plan generation

canned cutter path cycles

• geometric reasoning • expert planner • no human decision

Page 56: 13 - 1 8/10/2015 Process Engineering ISE789 -- Manufacturing Systems Spring 2011 Dr. R. A. Wysk

13 - 5604/19/23

THE DEVELOPMENT OF CAPP

1960 1970 1980 1990 2000

Intelligence of the system

Human Expert

?

manual planning

Data base

GT variant system

expert system

geometric reasoning

elementary machine learning

? technology