Upload
sheila
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
1/120
1Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
20 09 O ffic ia l Po ve rty Sta tistic s:20 09 O ffic ia l Po ve rty Sta tistic s:Tow a rd s Be tte r Ta rg e te dTow a rd s Be tte r Ta rg e te d
a nd Foc use d Pove rty Re d uc tion Prog ra m sa nd Foc use d Pove rty Re d uc tion Prog ra m s
Hum a n De ve lop m e nt C luste r M e e ting
4:00 PM , 17 M a rc h 2011Bu lw a g a n n g Ka ru n un g a n , De p a rtm e n t o f Ed u c a tio n
Pre se nte d b y
Ro m ulo A . V iro laSe c re ta ry G e n era l
Na tion a l Sta tistic a l C oo rd ina tion Boa rd
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
2/120
2Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
O utline of Pre se nta tion
I. Intro d uc tio n
II. 2009 O ffic ia l Pove rty Sta tistic s
A . Na tiona l
B. Re g ion a l/ Pro vinc ia l
I II . Som e Pol ic y/ Prog ra m Im p lic a tions
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
3/120
3Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
I . Intro d uc tio n
Exe c utive O rd e r 352De sig na tion o f Sta tistic a l Ac tivit ie s tha t wi ll G e ne ra te C ritic a lDa ta for De c ision- m a king o f the G ove rnm e nt a nd the Priva teSector
Issue d on July 1, 199 6 The Te c hnic a l C om m itte e o n Po ve rty Sta tistic s (TC Po vSta t)
c re a te d by the NSC B is in c ha rge of the
form ula tion / d e ve lop m e nt of the o ffic ia l p o ve rty e stim a tio n
m e t h o d o l o g y .
The NSCB generates and releases the official poverty
statistics in the Philippines.
SO URC E O F O FFIC IA L PO V ERTY STA TISTIC S IN THE PHILIPPINES
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
4/120
4Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
What is the Food Threshold?
Refers to the minimum income/expenditure required for afamily/individual to meet the basic food needs, which satisfies thenutritional requirements for economically necessary and socially
desirable physical activities
Also referred to as the subsistence thresholdor the food poverty line
SO M E DEFINITIO N S
I . Intro d uc tio n
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
5/120
5Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
What is the Poverty Threshold?
Refers to the minimum income/expenditure required for afamily/individual to meet the basic food and non-food requirements
Basic Non-Food Requirement includes: 1) clothing and footwear; 2) fuel, light andwater; 3) housing maintenance and other minor repairs; 4) rental of occupied
dwelling units; 5) medical care; 6) education; 7) transportation & communication; 8)non-durable furnishing; 9) household operations and 10) personal care and effects
Basic Non-Food Requirement excludes: 1) recreation; 2) tobacco; 3) alcoholicbeverages; 4) durable furnishings; 5) taxes; 6) special family occasion expenditure;7) total gifts and contributions; 8) total other disbursements (e.g., major repair ofhouse, loans granted to person outside family; amortization of real property).
Is equal to the cost of minimum basic needs:food + non-food
SO M E DEFINITIO N S
I . Intro d uc tio n
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
6/120
6Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
Who are the Food Poor/Core Poor?
Refers to families/individuals with per capita income/expenditureless than the per capita food threshold
Who are the Poor?
Refers to families/individuals with per capita income/expenditure
less than the per capita poverty threshold
SO M E DEFIN ITIO N S
I . Intro d uc tio n
If a family is poor, all the members of the family are consideredpoor
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
7/120
7Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
What is the Magnitude of the Food Poor/Core Poor?
Refers to the number of families/individuals who are food poor/corepoor
What is the Magnitude of the Poor?
Refers to the number of families/individuals who are poor
SO M E DEFIN ITIO N S
I . Intro d uc tio n
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
8/120
8Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
What is subsistence incidence?
Refers to the proportion of families/individuals with per capitaincome/expenditure less than the per capita food threshold to thetotal number of families/ individuals
Is Equal to the proportion of the food poor
What is poverty incidence?
Refers to the proportion of families/individuals with per capita
income/expenditure less than the per capita poverty threshold to
the total number of families/individuals
Is Equal to the proportion of the poor
SO M E DEFIN ITIO N S
I . Intro d uc tio n
Both subsistence incidence and poverty incidence can beexpressed as proportion of families or proportion of individuals
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
9/120
9Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
Ye a r Re fine m e nts C o nsid e ra tio ns
19871992 1 st Re fin em e n ts we re m a d e so a s no t to
overest imate pover ty
2003 2 nd Re fin em e n ts we re m a d e to g e n era tep rov inc ia l p ov e rty sta tistic s b y u singre g iona l m e nus p ric e d using
p rovinc ia l pr ic e s.2010 3 rd Re fin e n e m e n ts w e re u nd e rta k e n to
e n h a n c e comparabi l i ty of e stim a te sa c ro ss sp a c e a n d o ve r tim e .
History of the offic ia l p ov e rty e stim a tion m e tho d olog y
The 1 st offic ia l po ve rty e stim a tion m e thodo log y w a s a do pted in1987.B et ween 1 9 87 - 2 0 11 ( 2 4 y e a rs) , the re w e re three re fine m e nts onthe m e thod olog y sinc e its a do pt ion .
I . Intro d uc tio n
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
10/120
10Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
SO M E C O N SIDERA TIO N S IN REFININ G THE M ETHO DO LO G Y:
1 . To in tro d u c e re fin e m e n ts in th e m e th o d o lo g y a t the be ginn ing o fthe a d m inistra tion (or end of the a dm inistra tion) to a voidm isc onc e p tions tha t the re fine m e nts a re p ol itic a lly m ot iva te d . .
2 . Ba c k e stim a te s using the re fine d m e thod olog y should be re le a se dto e nsure tha t tre nd a na lysis c ould b e unde rta ke n in the p ove rty
e stim a te s.
3 . Enha nc e comparabi l i ty of po ve rty e stim a te s a c ross spa c e .
4 . Enha nc e comparabi l i ty of po ve rty e stim a te s ove r tim e .
5 . To re v ie w th e m e th o d o lo g y e v e ry te n y e a rs/ u se th e m e th o d o lo g yfor a t le a st 12 y e a rs (two a d m inistra tion s)
I . Intro d uc tio n
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
11/120
11Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
A PPRO V ED REFIN EM EN TS IN THE O FFIC IA L PO V ERTY ESTIM A TIO NMETHODOLOGY
C o m p o n e n t O ld 2003M e t h o d o l o g y
201 0 Re fine dM e t h o d o l o g y
I n c o m e - b a s e d
Foo d Threshold Estim a tio n
Fo o d Bund le Re g io na l Provincial
(Ba se d o n a na tiona lre fe re nce food bundle )
Pric e Da ta Use d Pro vinc ia l Pro vinc ia l
N o n- Fo o d Thre sho ld Estim a tio n Ind ire c t Ind ire c t
Re fe re nc e Fa m ily + / - 1 0 p e rc e n tile b a n da round the food
thre shold p e r p rov inc eurban-rural
+ / - 1 0 p e rc e n tile b a n da round the foo d
thre sho ld a t thenat ional level
C o nsta nt/ C ha ng ing C ha ng ing Constant
(Ave ra ge o f 2000 , 2003 ,2006 and 2009)
I . Intro d uc tio n
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
12/120
12Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
Actual Prices
100% RENI for ene rgy100% RENI for protein80% RENI for vita m ins
a nd m inera ls
PROVINCIAL food bundle
Fa rm ga te Price
Fo o d e a t e nin the a re a
Re ta il Price
LEA ST costVisualizable
FO O D THRESHO LD
I f incom e / exp e nditure o f fa m ily / ind iv idua lis le ss tha n foo d thre sho ld
Pro vinc ia l SUBSISTEN C E IN C IDENC Ea nd M AG NITUDE O F SUBSISTENC E PO O R
Na tiona l foo d b und le
I . Intro d uc tio n
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
13/120
13Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
Non-food thresholdFoo d thre sho ld
C o nsta nt FE/ TBE ra tio
PO V ERTY THRESHO LD
I f inco m e / exp e nditure o f fa m ily / ind iv idua lis le ss tha n p ov e rty thre sho ld
Provinc ial PO VERTY IN C IDENC Ea nd M AG NITUDE O F PO O R
ACTUAL Non-Food Basic Needs
Educat ion
Clothing & footwea r
M e d ic a l c a r e Tran sportation &
co m m u n i ca t i o n
Fue l , light & wa ter
Housing
Housing maintenance &other m inor repa irs
Non -d urab le furnishings
Household ope ra t ions
Persona l ca re & e f fec ts
Renta l of oc cup ied d we llingunit
I . Intro d uc tio n
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
14/120
14Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
Meal Time Viands
Breakfast Scrambled egg
Boiled rice
Coffee with milk
Lunch Boiled monggo withmalunggay and dried dilis
Banana, latundan
Boiled rice
Dinner Fried tulingan
Boiled kangkong
Boiled rice
Snacks Pandesal
Na tiona l re fe re nc e food bund le f romthe Te st of Re ve a le d Pre fe re nc e
Meal Time Viands
Breakfast Scrambled egg
Coffee with milk
Boiled rice/rice-corn mix
Lunch Boiled/ginataang monggo withmalunggay and dried dilis
Banana
Boiled rice/corn mix
Dinner Fried fish/boiled pork
Vegetable dish
Boiled rice/rice-corn mix
Snacks Bread or boiled rootcrop
Sa m p le tra nsla tion: NC R
I . Intro d uc tio n
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
15/120
15Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
Meal Time Viands
Breakfast Scrambled egg
Boiled rice
Coffee with milk
Lunch Boiled monggo withmalunggay and dried dilis
Banana, latundan
Boiled rice
Dinner Fried tulingan
Boiled kangkong
Boiled rice
Snacks Boiled camote
Na tiona l re fe re nc e food bund le f romthe Te st of Re ve a le d Pre fe re nc e
Meal Time Viands
Breakfast Scrambled egg
Coffee with milk
Boiled rice/rice-corn mix
Lunch Boiled/ginataang monggo withmalunggay and dried dilis
Banana
Boiled rice/corn mix
Dinner Fried fish/boiled pork
Vegetable dish
Boiled rice/rice-corn mix
Snacks Bread or boiled rootcrop
Sa m p le tra nsla tio n:
N u e v a Ec ija
I . Intro d uc tio n
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
16/120
16Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
Meal Time Viands
Breakfast Scrambled egg
Boiled rice
Coffee with milk
Lunch Boiled monggo withmalunggay and dried dilis
Banana, latundan
Boiled rice
Dinner Fried galunggong
Boiled kangkong
Boiled rice
Snacks Boiled saba
Na tiona l re fe re nc e food bund le f romthe Te st of Re ve a le d Pre fe re nc e
Meal Time Viands
Breakfast Scrambled egg
Coffee with milk
Boiled rice/rice-corn mix
Lunch Boiled/ginataang monggo withmalunggay and dried dilis
Banana
Boiled rice/corn mix
Dinner Fried fish/boiled pork
Vegetable dish
Boiled rice/rice-corn mix
Snacks Bread or boiled rootcrop
Sa m p le tra nsla tio n:
Za m b o a ng a d e l N o rte
I . Intro d uc tio n
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
17/120
17Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
III. The 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
18/120
18Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
Indicators
Old Methodology Refined Difference
2003 2006 2009 2003 2006 2009 2003 2006 2009
Among families
Subsistence Incidence (%) 10.2 11.0 10.3 8.2 8.7 7.9 (2.0) (2.3) (2.4)
Magnitude of Food Poor (in
million)
1.7 1.9 1.9 1.4 1.5 1.5 (17.6) (21.1) (21.1)
Poverty Incidence (%) 24.4 26.9 26.3 20.0 21.1 20.9 (4.4) (5.8) (5.4)
Magnitude of Poor (inmillion)
4.0 4.7 4.9 3.3 3.7 3.9 (17.5) (21.3) (20.4)
Among individuals
Subsistence Incidence (%) 13.5 14.6 13.9 11.1 11.7 10.8 (2.4) (2.9) (3.1)
Magnitude of Food Poor (in
million)
10.8 12.2 12.2 8.8 9.9 9.4 (18.5) (18.9) (23.0)
Poverty Incidence (%) 30.0 32.9 32.6 24.9 26.4 26.5 (5.1) (6.5) (6.1)
Magnitude of Poor
(in million)
23.8 27.6 28.5 19.8 22.2 23.1 (16.8) (19.6) (18.9)
In general, poverty estimates using both the old and refined methodology showed the same trend/pattern.In terms of levels, the use of the old methodology yielded higher poverty estimates as compared with those
generated based on the refined methodology.
II. Highlights of the 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
A. NA TION AL
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
19/120
19Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
4,573
5,562
7,017
5,129
6,274
7,953
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
2003 2006 2009
Old Refined
5,298
3,395
4,177
3,857
4,869
3,157
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
2003 2006 2009
Old Refined
On the average, the food thresholds and the poverty thresholds are
lower by 8% and 12%, respectively, using the refined methodology ascompared to the old methodology!
-10.8%
-11.3%
-11.8%
-7 .0%
-8.1%
-7 .7%
Food Threshold for a Family of Five(in Php)
Poverty Threshold for a Family of Five(in Php)
II. Highlights of the 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
A. NATIO NA L
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
20/120
20Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
Subsistence incidence and poverty incidence are lower by about 2 and5 percentage points, respectively, using the refined methodology ascompared to the old methodology.
26.326.9
24.4
20.921.120.0
0 .0
10.0
20.0
30.0
2 0 0 3 2 0 0 6 2 0 0 9
Old Refined
-4 .4-5 .4-5 .8
10.2 11.0 10.3
8 .2 8 .7 7 .9
-
10.0
20.0
30.0
2003 2006 20 09
Old Refined
-2.0 -2.4-2.3
Subsistence Incidence among Families (%) Poverty Incidence among Families (%)
II. Highlights of the 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
A. NATIO NA L
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
21/120
21Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
In 2009, family of five* needed PhP 160 daily income to meet food needs
and PhP 231 to stay out of poverty!
Da ily Pove rty Threshold for aFa m ily of Five (in PhP)
III. The 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
55
104127
160
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
1991 2003 2006 2009
79
150 183
231
0
50
100
150
200
250
1991 2003 2006 2009
Infla tion for foo d :
2006-2009:24.3%
Note: App lying 2010/ Ave . of Jan & Feb 2011 Food CPI to2009 Food thre shold:
2010 : Phils = PhP 165
2011 : Phils = PhP 170
Note: App lying 2010/ Ave . of Ja n a nd Feb. 2011 C PI for a l l item s to2009 poverty threshold:
2010 threshold= PhP 240
2011 threshold= PhP 246
A. NATIO NA L
Da ily Foo d Thre sho ld for aFa m ily o f Five (in PhP)
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
22/120
22Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
Among FAMILIES:
Subsistence incidence among families improved from 8.7% in 2006 to 7.9% in 2009.Out of 100 families --- 9 families were classified as food poor in 2006, thiswas reduced to 8 out of 100 families in 2009.
20.920.0
28.3
21.1
0 .0
5 .0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
1 9 9 1 2 0 0 3 2 0 0 6 2 0 0 9
13.3
8 .2
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
19 91 2003 2 006 200 9
(0.8)
Sub siste nc e Incide nc ea m ong Fa m ilie s (%)
Pove rty Inc id e nc ea m ong Fa m ilie s (%)
(0.2)
8.7
7.9
II. The 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
A. NATIO NA L
[20.2, 21.6]
[20.3, 21.8]
[19.2, 20.7]
[7.5, 8.3]
[8.2, 9.1][7.8, 8.7]
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
23/120
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
24/120
24Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
Among POPULATION:
Subsistence incidence among population improved from 11.7% in 2006 to10.8% in 2009!Out of 100 Filipinos -- 12 Filipinos were classified as food poor in 2006,this was reduced to 11 in 2009!
3 3 .1
2 4 . 9
2 6 . 4 2 6 . 5
0
5
1 0
1 5
2 0
2 5
3 0
3 5
1 9 9 1 2 0 0 3 2 0 0 6 2 0 0 9
16.5
11.1 10.8
11.7
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1991 2003 2006 2009
(0.9)
0.1
Subsiste nc e Incide nc ea m ong Popula t ion ( in %)
Pove rty Inc ide nc ea m ong Popula t ion ( in %)
II. The 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
A. NATIO NA L
[11.1, 12.3]
[10.3, 11.3]
[10.5, 11.7]
[24.1, 25.8]
[25.5, 27.3]
[25.6, 27.3]
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
25/120
25Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
3 3 .1
2 4 . 9
2 6 . 4 2 6 . 5
0
5
1 0
1 5
2 0
2 5
3 0
3 5
1 9 9 1 2 0 0 3 2 0 0 6 2 0 0 9
16.5
11.1 10.8
11.7
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1991 2003 2006 2009
(0.9)
0.1
Subsiste nc e Incide nc ea m ong Popula t ion ( in %)
Pove rty Inc ide nc ea m ong Popula t ion ( in %)
II. The 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
A. NATIO NA L
[11.1, 12.3]
[10.3, 11.3]
[10.5, 11.7]
[24.1, 25.8]
[25.5, 27.3]
[25.6, 27.3]
Among POPULATION:
In terms of poverty incidence among population, there was a very slightincrease during the three-year period from 26.4% in 2006 to 26.5% in2009.
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
26/120
26Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
MAGNITUDE among FAMILIES: Magnitude of subsistence poor families decreased by about 58,000 from 1.51million in 2006 to 1.45 million in 2009!However, in terms of magnitude of poor families, there was an increase ofabout 185,000 from 3.67 million in 2006 to 3.86 million out of in 2009!
3.39
3.29
3.86
3.67
2.00
2 .50
3 .00
3 .50
4 .00
1 9 9 1 2 0 0 3 2 0 0 6 20 0 9
1.51
1.451.36
1.60
-
0 .50
1.00
1.50
2.00
1 9 91 2 0 0 3 2 0 06 20 09
(4.0%)
5.2%
M a gnitud e of Subsiste nc e Poo rFa m ilie s (in m illion )
M a gnitud e of Poo r Fa m ilie s(in m illio n)
II. The 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
A. NATIO NA L
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
27/120
27Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
MAGNITUDE among POPULATION: Magnitude of subsistence poor population decreased by about 410,000 in2009 from 9.9 million in 2006 to 9.4 million in 2009!The magnitude of poor population increased by almost 970,000 Filipinos-from 22.2 million in 2006 to 23.1 in 2009 by 4.4%.
2 2 . 1 7
23.14
1 9 . 8 0
2 0 . 8 9
1 5 .0 0
1 6 .0 0
1 7 .0 0
1 8 .0 0
1 9 .0 0
2 0 .0 0
2 1 .0 0
2 2 .0 0
2 3 .0 0
2 4 .0 0
2 5 .0 0
1 9 9 1 2 0 0 3 2 0 0 6 2 0 0 9
10.40
8.80
9.44
9.85
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00
10.00
11.00
12.00
13.00
14.00
15.00
1 991 20 03 2 006 2009
(4.2%)
M a gnitud e of Subsiste nc e Poo rPo p ula tio n (in m illio n)
M a gnitud e of Poo r Pop ula tion(in m illio n)
4.4 %
II. The 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
A. NATIO NA L
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
28/120
28Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
Indicator 2003 to 2006 2006 to 2009
AMONG FAMILIES
Subsistence Incidence, Families + 0.5 - 0.8
Poverty Incidence, Families + 1.1 - 0.2
Magnitude of Food Poor Families + 154,000 - 58,000
Magnitude of Poor Families + 378,000 + 185,000
AMONG POPULATION
Subsistence Incidence, Population +0.6 - 0.9
Poverty Incidence, Population + 1.5 + 0.1
Magnitude of Food Poor Population +1.05 million - 0.41 million
Magnitude of Poor Population +2.38 million + 0.97 million
Summary of increases/decreases:
NATIONAL: While food poverty and poverty deteriorated between 2003 and 2006, theseimproved between 2006 and 2009 except for the increases in the poverty
incidence among population, magnitude of poor families and magnitude ofpoor population.The increases, however, were not as much as between 2003 and 2006!
II. The 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
29/120
29Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
Income shortfall of the poor decreased between 2006 and 2009!
FGT measure 2003 2006 2009 Inc/Dec
03-06 06-09
Income gap 27.7 27.2 25.7 (0.5) (1.5)
Total Cost (in pesos)
Per Capita Cost
(in pesos)
60.2 B 80.5 B 100.2 B 33.7 24.4
3,040 3,631 4,328 19.4 19.2
II. The 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
In 2009 , the a vera ge inco m e o f a p oo r Pino y n e e d e d to b einc re a se d by 25 .7% of the p o ve rty thre shold o r Ph p 4 ,3 2 8 ; Assum ing
di re c t c a sh tra nsfe rs, th is m e a ns tha t the g ove rnm e nt ne e d e d a to ta lo f PhP 100.2 b illion in 200 9 to e lim ina te p ov e rty in the c ou ntry. I tm ust be noted tha t b udg e t a lloc a te d for C C T a m ounts to :
2 0 0 9 7 .9 B; 2010 10B; 2011 21 .194B
A. NATIO NA L
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
30/120
30Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
Average per capita income of the bottom 10% of families rose faster thanprices of food!
Indicator 2006 2009 % Change
Subsistence Incidence (among families) 8.7 7.9 (0.8)
Inflation (food) 130.7 162.4 24.3
Inflation (all items) 137.9 160.0 16.0
Annual Per Capita Food Threshold 9,257 11,686 26.2
Mean/average per capita income (APCI)
All income groups 35,788 43,538 21.7
First decile class 7,389 9,681 31.0Second decile class 11,263 14,542 29.1Third decile class 14,599 18,542 27.0
Fourth decile class 18,249 23,003 26.0
Fifth decile class 22,781 28,281 24.1
Sixth decile class 28,493 35,068 23.1Seventh decile class 36,551 44,358 21.4
Eight decile class 48,200 58,362 21.1
Ninth decile class 69,335 83,662 20.7
Tenth decile class 151,130 184,997 22.4
II. The 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
A. NATIO NA L
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
31/120
31Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
Average per capita income of the bottom 30% of families rose faster thanprices of all items!
Indicator 2006 2009 % Change
Poverty Incidence (among families) 21.1 20.9 (0.2)
Inflation (food) 130.7 162.4 24.3
Inflation (all items) 137.9 160.0 16.0
Annual Per Capita Poverty Threshold 13,348 16,841 26.2
Mean/average per capita income (APCI)
All income groups 35,788 43,538 21.7
First decile class 7,389 9,681 31.0
Second decile class 11,263 14,542 29.1
Third decile class 14,599 18,542 27.0
Fourth decile class 18,249 23,003 26.0
Fifth decile class 22,781 28,281 24.1
Sixth decile class 28,493 35,068 23.1
Seventh decile class 36,551 44,358 21.4
Eight decile class 48,200 58,362 21.1
Ninth decile class 69,335 83,662 20.7
Tenth decile class 151,130 184,997 22.4
II. The 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
A. NATIO NA L
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
32/120
32Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
Caraga and Region IX consistently posted the highest subsistenceincidence among families in 2006 and 2009!
Region Subsisten ce incidence am ong fam ilies2 00 3 20 0 6 2 00 9
PH ILIPPIN ES 8 .2 8 .7 7 .9
Caraga 1 6 .6 1 6 .9 1 9 .7
Re gio n IX 2 5 .1 1 7 .9 1 8 .6
Re gio n X 1 6 .1 1 6 .3 1 5 .6
Re gion V I II 11 .1 1 3 .5 1 4 .4Re gion V I I 16 .0 1 7 .1 1 3 .2
Re gion V 18 .0 1 5 .7 1 2 .9
Re gion XII 10 .6 1 0 .8 1 1 .3
Re gion XI 12 .3 1 2 .1 1 1 .0
Re gion IV -B 11 .1 2 .8 1 0 .5
ARM M 7 .3 1 1 .6 8 .5
Re gion V I 9 .1 7 .9 7 .9
CAR 5 .8 8 .3 7 .6Re gion I 5 .8 7 .1 5 .5
Re gion II 4 .1 4 .3 4 .1
Re gion II I 2 .3 3 .7 3 .7
Re gion IV -A 2 .4 2 .8 2 .4
N CR 0 .3 0 .7 0 .4
II. The 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
B. REG IO N A L/ PRO V INC IAL
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
33/120
33Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
Caraga and ARMM consistently posted the highest poverty incidenceamong families in 2006 and 2009!
Region Poverty incidence am ong fam ilies2 00 3 20 0 6 2 00 9
PH ILIPPIN ES 20 .0 2 1 .1 2 0 .9
Caraga 3 7 .6 3 6 .9 3 9 .8
ARM M 2 5 .0 3 6 .5 3 8 .1
Re gio n IX 4 0 .5 3 4 .2 3 6 .6Re gion V 38 .0 3 6 .1 36 .0
Re gion V I II 30 .2 3 1 .1 33 .2
Re gion X 32 .4 3 2 .7 32 .8
Re gion V I I 32 .1 3 3 .5 30 .2
Re gion XII 27 .2 2 7 .1 28 .1
Re gion IV -B 29 .8 3 4 .3 27 .6
Re gion XI 25 .4 2 6 .2 25 .6
Re gion V I 23 .5 2 2 .1 23 .8
Re gion I 17 .8 2 0 .4 17 .8CAR 16 .1 1 8 .6 17 .1
Re gion II 15 .2 1 5 .5 14 .5
Re gion II I 9 .4 1 2 .0 12 .0
Re gion IV -A 9 .2 9 .4 10 .3
N CR 2 .1 3 .4 2 .6
II. The 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
B. REG IO N A L/ PRO V INC IAL
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
34/120
34Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
Regions VII, V, and X continue to have the biggest share in the total number of food poor families!
RegionM agn it ude of Fo od Po or Fam ilie s % Sh are to To ta l Fo od Po or Fam ilie s
20 0 3 20 0 6 20 0 9 2 0 03 20 0 6 20 0 9PH ILIPPIN ES 1 ,3 5 7 ,8 3 3 1 ,51 1 ,57 9 1 ,45 3 ,8 4 3 1 00 .0 1 0 0 .0 1 0 0 .0
Re gio n V I I 1 9 4 ,3 5 2 2 2 0 ,6 9 2 1 8 1 ,6 4 9 1 4 .3 1 4 .6 1 2 .5
Re gio n V 1 6 9 ,8 6 9 1 5 8 ,9 3 6 1 3 7 ,5 2 7 1 2 .8 1 0 .5 9 .5
Re gio n X 1 1 8 ,9 2 4 1 2 8 ,5 1 3 1 3 1 ,3 0 4 8 .8 8 .5 9 .0Re gio n V III 8 3 ,5 73 1 1 0 ,0 71 1 24 ,5 47 6 .2 7 .3 8 .6
Re gio n IX 1 47 ,13 7 1 1 7 ,6 55 1 22 ,8 93 10 .8 7 .8 8 .5Re gio n V I 1 14 ,92 9 1 0 8 ,5 85 1 15 ,2 98 8 .5 7 .2 7 .9
Re gio n XI 9 9 ,4 37 1 0 1 ,4 84 9 6 ,9 6 9 7 .3 6 .7 6 .7
Caraga 6 9 ,1 00 7 5 ,2 2 1 9 2 ,8 0 3 5 .1 5 .0 6 .4
Re gio n XI I 7 4 ,9 90 8 0 ,5 2 2 9 0 ,3 0 5 5 .5 5 .3 6 .2
Re gio n II I 4 0 ,8 20 6 9 ,9 5 7 7 5 ,5 8 5 3 .0 4 .6 5 .2
Re gio n IV -B 5 5 ,5 17 8 1 ,6 9 2 6 2 ,1 5 1 4 .1 5 .4 4 .3
Re gio n IV -A 5 3 ,4 87 6 2 ,1 6 6 5 8 ,4 6 8 3 .9 4 .1 4 .0Re gio n I 5 1 ,1 27 6 6 ,7 7 5 5 4 ,8 3 9 3 .8 4 .4 3 .8
ARM M 3 6 ,9 52 6 1 ,8 6 3 4 8 ,6 8 6 2 .7 4 .1 3 .3
Re gio n II 2 3 ,7 90 2 6 ,8 5 0 2 6 ,7 9 2 1 .8 1 .8 1 .8
CAR 1 6 ,1 51 2 5 ,2 4 5 2 4 ,6 2 5 1 .2 1 .7 1 .7
N CR 7 ,6 7 7 1 5 ,3 5 4 9 ,40 0 0 .6 1 .0 0 .6
II. The 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
B. REG IO N A L/ PRO V INC IAL
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
35/120
35Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
Regions VII, V, and VI continue to have the biggest share in the total number poor families!
RegionM agn it ude o f Po or Fam ilie s % Share t o Tot a l Poo r Fam ilie s
20 0 3 20 0 6 20 0 9 2 0 03 20 0 6 20 0 9PH ILIPPIN ES 3 ,2 93 ,0 96 3 ,6 7 0 ,7 9 1 3 ,8 55 ,7 30 1 00 .0 1 0 0 .0 1 00
Re gio n V I I 3 8 9 ,8 1 8 4 3 2 ,8 7 0 4 1 5 ,3 0 3 1 1 .8 1 1 .8 1 0 .8
Re gio n V 3 5 8 ,9 8 1 3 6 4 ,3 1 8 3 8 5 ,3 3 8 1 0 .9 9 .9 1 0 .0
Re gio n V I 2 9 8 ,0 5 8 3 0 2 ,8 3 6 3 4 5 ,7 0 3 9 .1 8 .2 9 .0Re gio n V III 2 2 7 ,4 5 8 2 53 ,3 47 28 7 ,1 5 6 6 .9 6 .9 7 .4
Re gio n X 2 3 9 ,8 7 4 2 57 ,6 40 27 5 ,4 3 3 7 .3 7 .0 7 .1Re gio n IV -A 2 0 1 ,7 2 5 2 10 ,8 30 24 8 ,1 7 9 6 .1 5 .7 6 .4
Re gio n II I 1 6 9 ,7 7 1 2 28 ,7 41 24 4 ,2 7 3 5 .2 6 .2 6 .3
Re gio n IX 2 3 7 ,8 9 8 2 24 ,3 78 24 2 ,2 8 5 7 .2 6 .1 6 .3
Re gio n XI 2 0 5 ,9 6 6 2 20 ,7 07 22 6 ,2 8 4 6 .3 6 .0 5 .9
Re gio n XI I 1 9 2 ,5 4 5 2 03 ,0 00 22 4 ,8 8 2 5 .8 5 .5 5 .8
ARM M 1 2 6 ,2 3 3 1 94 ,6 26 21 8 ,0 4 3 3 .8 5 .3 5 .7
Caraga 1 5 6 ,2 2 1 1 63 ,7 83 18 7 ,2 7 8 4 .7 4 .5 4 .9Re gio n I 1 5 6 ,2 6 1 1 93 ,3 92 17 9 ,1 7 9 4 .7 5 .3 4 .6
Re gio n IV -B 1 4 8 ,9 2 4 1 86 ,8 38 16 2 ,6 0 9 4 .5 5 .1 4 .2
Re gio n II 8 9 ,35 2 9 6 ,31 1 9 4 ,4 3 3 2 .7 2 .6 2 .4
N CR 4 8 ,92 3 8 0 ,82 8 6 4 ,4 0 4 1 .5 2 .2 1 .7
CAR 4 5 ,08 8 5 6 ,34 6 5 4 ,9 4 9 1 .4 1 .5 1 .4
II. The 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
B. REG IO N A L/ PRO V INC IAL
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
36/120
36Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
10 of 17 regions had decreasing subsistence incidence between2006 and 2009, only 5 regions between 2003 and 2006!
Region Su bsist en ce in cid en ce am o n g fa m ilie s In cr ease / D e cre ase2 00 3 20 0 6 2 0 09 03 -0 6 0 6 -09
PH ILIPPIN ES 8 .2 8 .7 7 .9 0 .4 (0 .8 )Region V II 1 6 .0 1 7 .1 1 3 .2 1 .1 (3 .8 )
ARM M 7 .3 1 1 .6 8 .5 4 .3 (3 .1 )
Region V 1 8 .0 1 5 .7 1 2 .9 (2 .2 ) (2 .9 )
Region I 5 .8 7 .1 5 .5 1 .2 (1 .6 )
Region XI 1 2 .3 1 2 .1 1 1 .0 (0 .2 ) (1 .1 )
CAR 5 .8 8 .3 7 .6 2 .5 (0 .7 )
Region X 1 6 .1 1 6 .3 1 5 .6 0 .2 (0 .6 )
Region IV -A 2 .4 2 .8 2 .4 0 .3 (0 .3 )N CR 0 .3 0 .7 0 .4 0 .3 (0 .3 )
Region I I 4 .1 4 .3 4 .1 0 .3 (0 .2 )
Region V I 9 .1 7 .9 7 .9 (1 .1 ) 0 .9
Region I I I 2 .3 3 .7 3 .7 1 .4 1 .0
Region XII 10 .6 1 0 .8 1 1 .3 0 .2 1 .7
Region IX 25 .1 1 7 .9 1 8 .6 (7 .1 ) 1 .7
Region V III 11 .1 1 3 .5 1 4 .4 2 .4 2 .1
Caraga 16 .6 1 6 .9 1 9 .7 0 .3 2 .4
Region IV -B 11 .1 2 .8 1 0 .5 (8 .3 ) 3 .0
II. The 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
B. REG IO NA L/ PRO V INC IAL
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
37/120
37Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
8 of 17 regions had decreasing poverty incidence between2006 and 2009, only 5 regions between 2003 and 2006!
Region Po ve rt y incid en ce am o ng fam ilies Incre ase/ D ecrease2 00 3 20 0 6 2 0 09 03 -0 6 0 6 -09
PH ILIPPIN ES 2 0 .0 2 1 .1 2 0 .9Region IV -B 2 9 .8 3 4 .3 2 7 .6 4 .5 (6 .7 )
Region V II 3 2 .1 3 3 .5 3 0 .2 1 .4 (3 .2 )
Region I 1 7 .8 2 0 .4 1 7 .8 2 .6 (2 .6 )
CAR 1 6 .1 1 8 .6 1 7 .1 2 .4 (1 .5 )
Region II 1 5 .2 1 5 .5 1 4 .5 0 .3 (1 .1 )
N CR 2 .1 3 .4 2 .6 1 .3 (0 .8 )
Region XI 2 5 .4 2 6 .2 2 5 .6 0 .9 (0 .6 )
Region V 3 8 .0 3 6 .1 3 6 .0 (1 .9 ) (0 .1 )Region I I I 9 .4 1 2 .0 1 2 .0 2 .6 0 .1
Region X 32 .4 3 2 .7 3 2 .8 0 .2 0 .2
Region IV -A 9 .2 9 .4 1 0 .3 0 .1 0 .9
Region XII 27 .2 2 7 .1 2 8 .1 (0 .1 ) 1 .0
ARM M 25 .0 3 6 .5 3 8 .1 1 1 .4 1 .7
Region V I 23 .5 2 2 .1 2 3 .8 (1 .4 ) 1 .7
Region V III 30 .2 3 1 .1 3 3 .2 1 .0 2 .1
Region IX 40 .5 3 4 .2 3 6 .6 (6 .3 ) 2 .4
Caraga 37 .6 3 6 .9 3 9 .8 (0 .7 ) 3 .0
II. The 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
B. REG IO NA L/ PRO V INC IAL
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
38/120
38Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
-
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
Regio
nVI
I
Regio
nV
Regio
nX
Regio
nVIII
Regio
nIX
Regio
nVI
Regio
nXI
Caraga
Regio
nXI
I
Regio
nIII
Regio
nIV
-B
Regio
nIV
-A
Regio
nI
ARMM
Regio
nII
CAR
NCR
2003
2006
2009
II. The 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
B. REG IO NA L/ PRO V INC IAL: M a g nitud e of Foo d Poo r Fa m ilie s
-39 ,043
14,476
8285191972735165214234946343917CCT(08-09)
NCRCARIIARMMIIV-AIV-BIIIXIICaragaXIVIIXVIIIXVVII
-21 ,409
-19,54117,582 9,783
Biggest reductions in the num be r of foo d p oo r fa m ilie s from 2006 to 2009 we re o bserved inRe gions VI I , V a nd IV-B. O n the o ther hand , la rge st inc re a se s we re observed in C a r a g a , RegionsV III a nd XII with 17,582, 14,476 a nd 9 ,783 inc re a se in foo d p oor fa m ilies , re spe c tive ly .
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
39/120
39Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
Biggest reductions in the num be r of poo r fa m ilies from 2006 to 2009 we re ob se rve d in Re g ions IV-B, VI I and NC R. O n the o ther ha nd , largest inc re a se s we re observed in Reg ions VI , IV- A a nd V I II,with 42 ,867, 37 ,349 an d 33 ,808 inc re a se in p oor fa m ilie s, respe c tive ly .
II. The 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
B. REG IO NA L/ PRO V INC IAL: M a g nitud e of Poo r Fa m ilie s
-
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
400,000
450,000
500,000
VII V VI VI
II XIV
-A III IX XI XII
ARMM
Cara
gaI
IV-B II
NCR
CAR
2003
2006
2009
-24 ,229
-17,567
-16,423
42,867
37,349
33,808
2885271952191614493573446233917CCT(08-09)
CARNCRIIIV-BICaragaARMMXIIXIIXIIIIV-AXVIIIVIVVII
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
40/120
40Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
-
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
3,000,000
V VII VI VI
II XIV
-A III
ARM
M IX XII XI
Cara
gaI
IV-B II
NCR
CAR
2003
2006
2009
II. The 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
-141,498
264,651
2885271952191614493573446233917CCT(08-09)
CARNCRIIIV-BICaragaXIXIIIXARMMIIIIV-AXVIIIVIVIIV
-107,790
-146,477
263,315
166,500
Biggest reductions in the num be r of foo d p oo r po pula tion from 2006 to 2009 we re ob serve d inRe gions I , IV- B a nd NC R.
B. REG IO NA L/ PRO V INC IAL: M a g nitud e of Foo d Poo r Pop ula tion
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
41/120
41Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
-
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
V VII VI VI
II XIV-A III
ARMM I
X XII XI
Caraga
IIV-B II
NCR
CAR
2003
2006
2009
Biggest reductions in the numb er o f poor popula t ion from 2006 to 2009 w ere o bserved in NCR,Regions IV-B and I. O n the o ther ha nd , la rge st inc re a se s we re o bserved in Reg ions VI , VI I I and IV-A , with 264,651, 263,315, and 166,550 incre a se s in the po or pop ulat ion, re spe c tive ly .
II. The 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
B. REG IO NA L/ PRO V INC IAL: M a g nitud e of Poo r Pop ula tion
-146,477
-141,498
-107,790
263,315
166,550
264,651
2885271952141649193573446231739CCT(08-09)
CARNCRIIIV-BICaragaXIXIIIXARMMIIIIV-AXVIIIVIVIIV
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
42/120
42Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
New entrants in the least poor cluster of provinces in 2009 were Ilocos Norte, Bataan,and Nueva Vizcaya!
B. REGIONAL/PROVINCIAL:Batanes, the 4 districts of NCR, Benguet, Cavite, Bulacan, Laguna, Rizal, and Pampangawere consistently included in the least poor cluster of provinces in 2003, 2006, and 2009!
II. The 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
8.74.26.53.71.62.73.91.92.9Rizal
8.44.96.75.22.43.86.33.54.9Pampanga
10.52.96.710.31.45.84.61.83.2Nueva Vizcaya
7.64.15.9634.56.93.55.2Laguna
12.36.19.216.95.811.320.67.914.3Ilocos Norte
5.93.14.55.72.64.26.23.44.8Cavite
5.93.74.86.63.75.15.72.94.3Bulacan
6.12452.13.67.11.74.4Benguet
0000006.36.36.3Batanes
104.87.410.547.2115.18.1Bataan
2.50.71.63.722.92.41.11.84th District
5.12.53.84.82.63.73.51.72.63rd District
3.21.62.45.52.13.83.41.72.62nd District
5.623.84.51.73.11.70.41.11st District
Upperlimit
Lowerlimit
Upperlimit
Lowerlimit
Upperlimit
Lower limit
90% CIPoverty
incidence
90% CIPoverty
incidence
90% CIPoverty
incidence
200920062003
Province
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
43/120
43Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
Agusan del Sur, Bohol, Maguindanao, Masbate, Surigao del Norte and Zamboanga del Norte wereconsistently included in the bottom cluster of provinces in 2003, 2006, and 2009!
II. The 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
50.935.443.242.525.734.153.233.343.3Zamboanga Sibugay
59.84652.961.746.454.167.551.459.5Zamboanga del Norte
40.822.231.558.439.849.128.28.118.2Tawi-tawi
52.843.147.948.334.941.649.435.242.3Surigao Del Norte
45.53339.344.229.136.727.113.420.3Sulu
41.728.835.246.530.938.746.528.137.3Sultan Kudarat
44.321.332.837.613.925.863.527.445.5Siquijor
47.33440.738.829.234.045.128.436.7Saranggani
49.836.34346.634.740.643.727.935.8Romblon
32.418.325.450.730.440.640.324.932.6Occidental Mindoro
5132.441.753.832.943.347.027.937.4Northern Samar
43.229.536.452.736.144.451.535.643.6Negros Oriental
44.129.736.945.730.738.243.430.637Misamis Occidental
48.336.642.551.833.942.95842.350.2Masbate
51.637.744.650.93944.949.534.441.9Maguindanao
46.131.93940.628.134.344.12735.6Lanao del Norte
54.137.645.843.531.837.63920.529.8Eastern Samar
48.636.442.550.1283944.426.735.6Davao Oriental
46.825.936.453.721.937.838.731.535.1Camiguin
43.633.838.742.33136.644.132.538.3Camarines Sur
39.225.332.339.221.630.452.928.640.7Camarines Norte
48.433.641.051.635.843.746.733.840.2Bohol
49.423.236.349.424.63718.03.410.7Apayao
58.943.551.252.938.245.555.641.348.5Agusan del Sur
Upper limitLower limitUpperlimit
Lower limitUpper limitLower limit
90% CIPoverty
incidence
90% CIPoverty
incidence
90% CIPoverty
incidence
200920062003
Province
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
44/120
44Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
B. REGIONAL/PROVINCIAL:Cebu and Negros Occidental continue to have the biggest share in the totalnumber of poor families!
ProvinceMagnitude of Poor Families % Share to Total Poor Families
2003 2006 2009 2003 2006 2009
PHILIPPINES 3,293,096 3,670,791 3,855,730 100 100 100
Cebu 185,624 211,406 213,162 5.6 5.8 5.5
Negros Occidental 112,512 130,077 144,828 3.4 3.5 3.8
Camarines Sur 116,460 119,747 126,280 3.5 3.3 3.3
Pangasinan 92,191 128,396 114,400 2.8 3.5 3.0
Nueva Ecija 64,808 94,026 112,367 2.0 2.6 2.9
Leyte 99,082 104,260 110,214 3.0 2.8 2.9
Zamboanga del Norte 102,074 101,511 109,745 3.1 2.8 2.8
Bohol 90,735 104,032 102,522 2.8 2.8 2.7
Quezon 84,031 101,394 98,426 2.6 2.8 2.6
Davao del Sur 88,165 89,452 94,049 2.7 2.4 2.4
Negros Oriental 105,334 112,585 91,387 3.2 3.1 2.4
II. The 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
45/120
45Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
B. REGIONAL/PROVINCIAL: Magnitude of Poor FamiliesN e gros O rien ta l , Ta wi-Ta wi a nd Pa nga sinan had the b igg est red uct ion a m ong po orfamil ies from 2006 to 2009!
II. The 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
-
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
Panga
sinan
NegrosOr
iental
MisamisOr
iental
Palaw
an
OrientalMi
ndoro
An
tique
OccidentalMi
ndoro
2ndD
istri
ct
Zambales
Tawi-t
awi
2003
2006
2009
122956144107CCT (08-09)
Tawi-TawiZambales2nd DistrictOccidentalMindoro
AntiqueOrientalMindoro
Palawan
MisamisOriental
NegrosOriental
Pangasinan
-13 ,996
-21,199
-14,978
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
46/120
46Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
B. REGIONAL/PROVINCIAL: Magnitude of Poor PopulationSulu, La na o d e l Sur, a nd I loilo w e re the p rovince s tha t ha ve la rg e st inc re a se s in thenum be r of po or fa m ilie s from 2006-2009!
II. The 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
204461523118CCT (08-09)
PampangaRizalLanao delSur
MisamisOccidental
SuluLanao delNorte
SouthCotabato
IloiloNuevaEcija
NegrosOccidental
-
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
Negros
Occidental
Nueva
Ecija
Iloilo
SouthC
otabato
Lanaode
lNorte
Sulu
MisamisOcc
identa
l
Lanao
delSur
Rizal
Pam
pang
a
2003
2006
2009
19,972
24,945 18,957
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
47/120
47Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
B. REG IO NA L/ PRO V INC IAL:In terms of poverty incidence, most provinces with more than 40% of total
families are poor were located in Visayas and Mindanao. However, in terms of
magnitude of poor families, provinces with more than 100,000 were mostlylocated in Luzon and Visayas.
II. The 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
48/120
48Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
II. 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
Contiguous regions with high concentration of poor families could beprioritized in DSWDs poverty intervention programs.
N u e v aEcija
Pangasinan
C e b u
BoholN eg r o sO c c i d e n t a l
C a m a r i n e sSur
Le yte
Z a m b o a n g adel Norte
5.9%
3.3%
14.9%
2.8%
Province No. ofMunicipalitywith CCT
Pangasinan 7
Nueva Ecija 11
CamarinesSur
5
NegrosOccidental
8
Bohol 1
Cebu 6
Leyte 10
Zamboangadel Norte
27
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
49/120
49Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
II. 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
Subsistence and poverty incidence among families in 2009 were notablyhigh in Mindanao provinces.
Province s with high p ove rty
and subsistencei n c i d e n c e s
1 . Ta w i- Ta w i
2. M a g u ind a na o
3 . Su lu
4. D a va o O rie n ta l
5. Za m b o a n g a d e l N o rte6 . A g u sa n d e l Su r
7 . Su lta n Ku d a ra t
8. M a sb a te
9 . N e g ro s O rie n ta l
10 .Northern Samar
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
50/120
50Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
In 2009, 8 (or 9%) out of 85 provinces/NCR districts with small magnitude of POOR families, wereincluded in the CCT program.
No CCTin
Easte rnSam arin 2008-
2009
II. 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
51/120
51Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
In 2009, 23 (or 27%) out of 85 provinces/NCR districts with small magnitude of FOOD POOR families, wereincluded in the CCT program.
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
52/120
52Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
II. The 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
Most of the provinces with high poverty incidence and low human development index in2006 can be observed in Mindanao.
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
53/120
53Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
Cluster# of
provinces
Total Population
in 2009
Percent
Distribution
1 15 12,008,400 13.0
2 23 13,564,900 14.73 24 32,188,900 34.9
4 9 8,073,200 8.8
5 14 26,391,200 28.6
II. The 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
Distribution of Provinces Across ClustersBa se d o n C I o f the 2009 Pove rty Inc ide nc e Am ong Fa m ilie s
B. REG IO NA L/ PRO V INC IAL:
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
54/120
54Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
II. The 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
Distrib ution o f Pro vinc e s A c ro ss C lusters Ba se d on C I
of the 2003, 2006 a nd 2009 Pove rty Inc ide nc e Am ong Fa m ilie s
85
13
12
22
28
10
2003
8585TOTAL
14115
954
24203
23302
15191
20092006
Number of ProvincesCluster
B. REG IO NA L/ PRO V INC IAL:
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
55/120
55Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
03-06 06-09
Food Threshold 9,776 11,515 13,831 17.8 20.1
Subsistence Incidence
(among families) 0.3 0.7 0.4 0.4 (0.3)
Inflation (food) 108.5 127.8 153.5 17.8 20.1
Poverty Threshold 13,997 16,487 19,802 17.8 20.1
Poverty Incidence
(among families) 2.1 3.4 2.6 1.3 (0.8)Inflation (all items) 114.5 140.7 156.9 22.9 11.5
Mean per capita income
All income groups 57,683 66,106 77,462 14.6 17.2
First decile class 16,132 17,496 21,714 8.5 24.1
Second decile class 23,567 26,395 31,097 12.0 17.8
Third decile class 29,031 33,051 39,112 13.8 18.3
Fourth Decile class 34,145 40,037 47,069 17.3 17.6Fifth Decile class 40,100 47,945 56,273 19.6 17.4
Sixth Decile class 48,199 57,777 67,964 19.9 17.6
Seventh Decile class 58,124 71,696 83,226 23.4 16.1
Eighth Decile class 74,030 92,717 107,377 25.2 15.8
Ninth Decile class 102,336 127,839 145,456 24.9 13.8
Tenth Decile class 235,805 263,928 309,122 11.9 17.1
% change2003 2006 2009
NCRStatistics/
Income decile class
In NCR, the average per capita income of the bottom 10%of families rose faster than prices of food and all items!
II. The 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
56/120
56Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
03-06 06-09
Food Threshold 7,636 9,001 11,249 17.9 25.0
Subsistence Incidence
(among families) 5.8 8.3 7.6 2.5 (0.7)
Inflation (food) 106.8 128.4 158.4 20.2 23.4
Poverty Threshold 10,881 12,976 16,122 19.3 24.3
Poverty Incidence
(among families) 16.1 18.6 17.1 2.4 (1.5)Inflation (all items) 115.2 140.0 160.9 21.5 14.9
Mean per capita income
All income groups 31,260 39,989 46,694 27.9 16.8
First decile class 6,948 7,561 9,617 8.8 27.2
Second decile class 10,428 11,645 14,828 11.7 27.3
Third decile class 13,813 15,371 19,488 11.3 26.8
Fourth Decile class 17,051 19,504 24,866 14.4 27.5Fifth Decile class 21,730 24,782 31,376 14.0 26.6
Sixth Decile class 27,309 31,482 39,751 15.3 26.3
Seventh Decile class 34,611 41,103 49,596 18.8 20.7
Eighth Decile class 45,200 55,442 64,151 22.7 15.7
Ninth Decile class 64,530 79,832 91,944 23.7 15.2
Tenth Decile class 122,662 177,643 194,703 44.8 9.6
Statistics/
Income decile class
CAR
2003 2006 2009% change
In CAR, the average per capita income of families belonging to the 1st
and 2nd decile classes rose faster than prices of food and all items!
II. The 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
57/120
57Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
03-06 06-09
Food Threshold 8,269 10,016 12,389 21.1 23.7
Subsistence Incidence (among families) 5.8 7.1 5.5 1.2 (1.6)
Inflation (food) 111.1 135.3 167.4 21.8 23.7
Poverty Threshold 11,791 14,350 17,768 21.7 23.8
Poverty Incidence (among families ) 17.8 20.4 17.8 2.6 (2.6)
Inflation (all items) 112.9 139.4 161.3 23.5 15.7
Mean per capita income
All income groups 26,080 29,966 40,239 14.9 34.3
First decile class 7,491 8,815 11,447 17.7 29.9
Second decile class 10,851 12,823 16,738 18.2 30.5
Third decile class 13,383 15,762 20,196 17.8 28.1
Fourth Decile class 15,962 18,392 23,804 15.2 29.4
Fifth Decile class 18,808 21,803 28,077 15.9 28.8Sixth Decile class 22,482 25,969 33,698 15.5 29.8
Seventh Decile class 27,513 31,870 41,487 15.8 30.2
Eighth Decile class 35,132 40,380 51,577 14.9 27.7
Ninth Decile class 48,488 54,992 70,526 13.4 28.2
Tenth Decile class 96,014 109,900 162,162 14.5 47.6
Statistics/Income decile class
Region I
% change2003 2006 2009
In Region I, the average per capita income of families belonging to the1st and 2nd decile class rose faster than prices of food and all items!
II. The 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
58/120
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
59/120
59Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
03-06 06-09
Food Threshold 8,902 10,719 13,308 20.4 24.2Subsistence Incidence
(among fam ilies ) 2.3 3.7 3.7 1.4 0.1
Inflation (food) 107.9 129.7 159.7 20.2 23.1
Poverty Threshold 12,771 15,374 18,981 20.4 23.5Poverty Incidence
(among fam ilies ) 9.4 12.0 12.0 2.6 0.1
Inflation (all items ) 111.3 134.1 158.8 20.5 18.4
Mean per capita incom e
All incom e groups 32,719 40,595 46,944 24.1 15.6
First decile class 10,175 11,233 13,785 10.4 22.7
Second decile class 14,800 16,424 20,397 11.0 24.2
Third decile class 18,204 20,568 25,561 13.0 24.3
Fourth Decile class 21,756 24,910 30,367 14.5 21.9
Fifth Decile class 25,798 29,597 35,909 14.7 21.3Sixth Decile class 30,457 35,435 42,157 16.3 19.0
Seventh Decile class 36,237 42,940 51,057 18.5 18.9
Eighth Decile class 45,065 53,747 63,562 19.3 18.3
Ninth Decile class 59,496 72,496 84,940 21.8 17.2
Tenth Decile class 106,362 145,897 156,146 37.2 7.0
% change
Region III
2003 2006 2009Statistics/
Income decile class
In Region III, prices of food and all items rose faster that the average percapita income of families belonging to the 1st and 2nd decile classes!
II. The 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
60/120
60Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
03-06 06-09
Food Threshold 8,539 9,901 12,278 15.9 24.0
Subsis tence Incidence
(among families) 2.4 2.8 2.4 0.3 (0.3)
Inflation (food) 108.1 125.5 154.9 16.1 23.4
Poverty Threshold 12,394 14,284 17,779 15.2 24.5
Poverty Incidence
(among families) 9.2 9.4 10.3 0.1 0.9Inflation (all items ) 114.7 137.4 157.1 19.8 14.3
Mean per capita income
All income groups 39,629 45,276 53,029 14.2 17.1
First decile class 9,742 11,021 13,789 13.1 25.1
Second decile class 14,818 17,102 20,486 15.4 19.8
Third decile class 19,086 22,097 25,699 15.8 16.3
Fourth Decile class 23,620 27,220 31,425 15.2 15.4
Fifth Decile class 28,777 33,056 38,025 14.9 15.0Sixth Decile class 34,835 39,528 46,116 13.5 16.7
Seventh Decile class 42,639 48,170 56,218 13.0 16.7
Eighth Decile class 53,753 60,993 71,644 13.5 17.5
Ninth Decile class 73,409 82,366 96,221 12.2 16.8
Tenth Decile class 149,106 160,931 202,748 7.9 26.0
Statistics/
Income decile class
Region IV-A
2003 2006 2009% change
In Region IVA, the average per capita income of the bottom 10% of families rosefaster than prices of food, while the average per capita income of familiesbelonging to the 1st to 2nd decile classes rose slower than prices of all items.
II. The 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
61/120
61Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
03-06 06-09
Food Threshold 7,270 8,870 10,978 22.0 23.8Subsistence Incidence (among families) 11.1 2.8 10.5 (8.3) 7.8Inflation (food) 109.5 131.6 163.1 20.2 23.9
P overty Threshold 10,398 12,610 15,769 21.3 25.0Poverty Incidence(among families) 29.8 34.3 27.6 4.5 (6.7)
Inflation (all items) 112.5 133.0 156.3 18.2 17.5
Mean per capita incomeAll income groups 20,107 21,631 29,727 7.6 37.4
First decile class 5,506 6,049 8,488 9.9 40.3Second decile class 7,884 8,755 12,342 11.0 41.0Third decile class 9,558 10,536 14,969 10.2 42.1Fourth Decile class 11,422 12,665 17,588 10.9 38.9Fifth Decile class 13,521 15,192 20,823 12.4 37.1
Sixth Decile class 16,060 18,255 24,924 13.7 36.5Seventh Decile class 19,571 22,172 30,386 13.3 37.0Eighth Decile class 25,347 27,861 39,161 9.9 40.6Ninth Decile class 35,758 39,545 55,363 10.6 40.0Tenth Decile class 91,636 89,490 123,781 (2.3) 38.3
Statistics/Income decile class
Region IV-B
2003 2006 2009% change
In Region IVB, the average per capita income of the bottom 30% offamilies rose faster than prices of food and all items.
II. The 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
62/120
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
63/120
63Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
03-06 06-09
Food Threshold 7,374 8,659 11,254 17.4 30.0
Subsistence Incidence
(among families) 9.1 7.9 7.9 (1.1) 0.0
Inflation (food) 107.8 127.6 164.2 18.4 28.7
Poverty Threshold 10,548 12,432 16,036 17.9 29.0
Poverty Incidence
(among families) 23.5 22.1 23.8 (1.4) 1.7Inflation (all items) 113.6 134.1 160.4 18.0 19.6
Mean per capita income
All income groups 23,489 27,635 34,147 17.6 23.6
First decile class 5,929 7,553 9,562 27.4 26.6
Second decile class 8,713 10,576 13,398 21.4 26.7
Third decile class 10,814 13,054 16,420 20.7 25.8
Fourth Decile class 12,990 15,321 19,805 17.9 29.3
Fifth Decile class 15,461 18,254 23,478 18.1 28.6
Sixth Decile class 18,576 21,958 28,165 18.2 28.3
Seventh Decile class 22,787 26,590 34,202 16.7 28.6
Eighth Decile class 29,460 34,918 44,406 18.5 27.2
Ninth Decile class 42,704 50,836 65,037 19.0 27.9
Tenth Decile class 98,435 111,258 136,529 13.0 22.7
Statistics/
Income decile class
Region VI
2003 2006 2009 % change
In Region VI, the average per capita income of the bottom 30% offamilies rose slower than prices of food and all items.
II. The 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
64/120
64Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
03-06 06-09
Food Threshold 8,150 10,069 12,410 23.5 23.2
Subsis tence Incidence
(among families) 16.0 17.1 13.2 1.1 (3.8)
Inflation (food) 117.9 143.9 176.4 22.1 22.6
Poverty Threshold 11,798 14,468 17,848 22.6 23.4
Poverty Incidence
(among families) 32.1 33.5 30.2 1.4 (3.2)Inflation (all items) 119.7 142.6 166.0 19.1 16.4
Mean per capita income
All income groups 24,730 29,189 37,850 18.0 29.7
First decile class 4,957 6,267 8,562 26.4 36.6
Second decile class 7,860 9,511 12,751 21.0 34.1
Third decile class 10,163 12,067 16,154 18.7 33.9
Fourth Decile class 12,557 14,975 19,796 19.3 32.2
Fifth Decile class 15,510 18,685 24,129 20.5 29.1
Sixth Decile class 19,196 23,294 29,373 21.3 26.1
Seventh Decile class 24,022 29,344 37,046 22.2 26.2
Eighth Decile class 32,069 38,522 48,865 20.1 26.9
Ninth Decile class 46,777 55,380 72,090 18.4 30.2
Tenth Decile class 101,891 114,936 150,249 12.8 30.7
Statistics/
Income decile class
Region VII
2003 2006 2009% change
In Region VII, the average per capita income of families belonging to the1st to 4th decile classes rose faster than prices of food and all items.
II. The 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
II Th 2009 Offi i l P S i i
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
65/120
65Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
03-06 06-09
Food Threshold 6,884 8,317 11,126 20.8 33.8
Subsis tence Incidence
(among families) 11.1 13.5 14.4 2.4 0.9
Inflation (food) 109.5 132.0 176.2 20.5 33.5
Poverty Threshold 9,850 11,885 15,910 20.7 33.9
Poverty Incidence
(among families) 30.2 31.1 33.2 1.0 2.1
Inflation (all items) 112.0 133.1 164.3 18.8 23.4
Mean per capita incomeAll income groups 20,795 25,042 33,157 20.4 32.4
First decile class 5,461 5,989 8,063 9.7 34.6
Second decile class 7,505 8,585 11,290 14.4 31.5
Third decile class 9,067 10,667 13,762 17.6 29.0
Fourth Decile class 10,621 12,665 16,269 19.2 28.5Fifth Decile class 12,515 14,971 19,299 19.6 28.9
Sixth Decile class 14,941 18,131 22,867 21.3 26.1
Seventh Decile class 18,282 22,391 28,804 22.5 28.6
Eighth Decile class 23,901 29,269 37,353 22.5 27.6
Ninth Decile class 36,145 46,263 59,470 28.0 28.5
Tenth Decile class 100,044 112,835 165,382 12.8 46.6
Region VIII
2003 2006 2009% changeStatistics/
Income decile class
In Region VIII, the average per capita income of the bottom 10% rose faster thanprices of food, while the average per capita income of families belonging to 1st
to 4th decile classes rose faster than the prices of all items.
II. The 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
II Th 2009 Offi i l P t St ti ti
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
66/120
66Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
03-06 06-09
Food Threshold 6,744 8,226 10,587 22.0 28.7
Subsistence Incidence
(among families) 25.1 17.9 18.6 (7.1) 0.6
Inflation (food) 108.1 132.3 169.8 22.4 28.3
Poverty Threshold 9,642 11,810 15,160 22.5 28.4
Poverty Incidence
(among families) 40.5 34.2 36.6 (6.3) 2.4Inflation (all items) 110.1 134.3 163.4 22.0 21.7
Mean per capita income
All income groups 19,469 25,515 30,181 31.1 18.3
First decile class 3,365 4,772 6,799 41.8 42.5
Second decile class 5,243 7,315 9,689 39.5 32.5
Third decile class 6,667 9,554 12,255 43.3 28.3
Fourth Decile class 8,596 11,663 14,792 35.7 26.8
Fifth Decile class 10,564 14,099 17,952 33.5 27.3
Sixth Decile class 13,114 17,316 22,072 32.0 27.5
Seventh Decile class 16,829 22,427 27,793 33.3 23.9
Eighth Decile class 22,574 31,532 36,319 39.7 15.2
Ninth Decile class 35,834 48,067 55,331 34.1 15.1
Tenth Decile class 89,020 111,832 141,819 25.6 26.8
Statistics/Income decile class
Region IX
2003 2006 2009 % change
In Region IX, the average per capita income of families belonging to the 1st to 2nd
decile classes rose faster than prices of food, while the average per capita income offamilies belonging to 1st to 4th decile classes rose faster than the prices of all items.
II. The 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
II Th 2009 Offi i l P t St ti ti
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
67/120
67Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
03-06 06-09
Food Threshold 7,312 9,080 11,543 24.2 27.1
Subsistence Incidence
(among families) 16.1 16.3 15.6 0.2 (0.6)
Inflation (food) 109.5 135.1 172.3 23.4 27.5
Poverty Threshold 10,501 12,987 16,568 23.7 27.6
Poverty Incidence
(among families) 32.4 32.7 32.8 0.3 0.1
Inflation (all items) 113.6 139.3 168.0 22.6 20.6
Mean per capita income
All income groups 22,212 28,460 34,500 28.1 21.2
First decile class 4,722 5,953 7,619 26.1 28.0
Second decile class 7,072 8,719 11,267 23.3 29.2
Third decile class 9,004 10,996 14,295 22.1 30.0
Fourth Decile class 11,050 13,667 17,368 23.7 27.1Fifth Decile class 13,399 16,770 20,855 25.2 24.4
Sixth Decile class 16,094 20,387 25,949 26.7 27.3
Seventh Decile class 20,272 26,449 33,162 30.5 25.4
Eighth Decile class 27,782 37,104 44,265 33.6 19.3
Ninth Decile class 42,700 54,973 65,677 28.7 19.5
Tenth Decile class 95,330 126,361 144,022 32.6 14.0
Statistics/Income decile class
Region X
2003 2006 2009% change
In Region X, the average per capita income of families belonging to the 1st to 2nd decileclasses rose faster than prices of food, while the average per capita income offamilies belonging to 1st to 4th decile classes rose faster than the prices of all items.
II. The 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
II Th 2009 Offi i l P t St ti ti
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
68/120
68Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
03-06 06-09
Food Threshold 7,493 9,392 11,879 25.4 26.5
Subsis tence Incidence
(among families) 12.3 12.1 11.0 (0.2) (1.1)
Inflation (food) 109.0 136.5 173.3 25.2 27.0
Poverty Threshold 10,737 13,469 17,040 25.4 26.5
Poverty Incidence
(among families) 25.4 26.2 25.6 0.9 (0.6)Inflation (all items) 112.8 140.7 167.0 24.7 18.7
Mean per capita income
All income groups 23,846 28,037 35,835 17.6 27.8
First decile class 5,383 7,094 8,977 31.8 26.6
Second decile class 8,132 10,199 13,361 25.4 31.0
Third decile class 10,539 13,144 16,969 24.7 29.1
Fourth Decile class 12,857 16,051 20,530 24.8 27.9Fifth Decile class 15,728 19,510 24,773 24.1 27.0
Sixth Decile class 19,076 23,731 30,074 24.4 26.7
Seventh Decile class 23,434 29,369 36,479 25.3 24.2
Eighth Decile class 30,154 37,522 46,917 24.4 25.0
Ninth Decile class 42,165 52,730 66,657 25.1 26.4
Tenth Decile class 100,919 103,021 147,614 2.1 43.3
Statistics/Income decile class
Region XI
2003 2006 2009 % change
In Region XI, the average per capita income of the bottom 30% offamilies rose faster than the prices of food and all items.
II. The 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
II Th 2009 Offi i l P t St ti ti
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
69/120
69Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
03-06 06-09
Food Threshold 7,154 8,757 11,014 22.4 25.8
Subsistence Incidence
(among families) 10.6 10.8 11.3 0.2 0.5
Inflation (food) 108.4 132.2 166.3 22.0 25.8
Poverty Threshold 10,277 12,530 15,762 21.9 25.8
Poverty Incidence(among families) 27.2 27.1 28.1 (0.1) 1.0
Inflation (all items ) 111.3 133.4 160.2 19.9 20.1
Mean per capita incom e
All income groups 24,272 24,281 32,975 0.0 35.8
First decile class 5,563 6,939 8,327 24.7 20.0
Second decile class 8,001 9,652 12,093 20.6 25.3
Third decile class 9,846 11,996 14,730 21.8 22.8
Fourth Decile class 11,916 14,415 17,739 21.0 23.1
Fifth Decile class 14,184 17,016 21,287 20.0 25.1
Sixth Decile class 17,098 20,336 25,750 18.9 26.6
Seventh Decile class 21,011 24,617 31,600 17.2 28.4
Eighth Decile class 26,564 31,337 40,723 18.0 30.0
Ninth Decile class 37,855 44,275 60,265 17.0 36.1
2003 2006 2009% change
Statistics/
Income decile class
Region XII
In Region XII, the average per capita income of families belonging to the 1st to 2nd
decile classes did not increase as fast as the increase in the prices of food, while theaverage per capita income of families belonging to 2nd to 3rd decile classes rose fasterthan the prices of all items.
II. The 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
II The 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
70/120
70Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
03-06 06-09
Food Threshold 7,291 9,099 11,863 24.8 30.4
Subsistence Incidence
(among families) 16.6 16.9 19.7 0.3 2.8
Inflation (food) 108.9 136.0 177.5 24.9 30.5
Poverty Threshold 10,355 12,935 16,858 24.9 30.3
Poverty Incidence
(among families) 37.6 36.9 39.8 (0.7) 2.9
Inflation (all items) 112.1 137.4 168.8 22.6 22.9
Mean per capita income
All income groups 17,574 22,821 29,526 29.9 29.4
First decile class 4,816 5,853 7,553 21.5 29.0
Second decile class 6,789 8,408 10,591 23.8 26.0
Third decile class 8,335 10,409 12,961 24.9 24.5
Fourth Decile class 9,847 12,509 15,448 27.0 23.5Fifth Decile class 11,462 14,701 18,064 28.3 22.9
Sixth Decile class 13,543 17,613 21,517 30.1 22.2
Seventh Decile class 17,053 21,592 26,635 26.6 23.4
Eighth Decile class 22,283 28,006 34,164 25.7 22.0
Ninth Decile class 33,451 40,143 50,559 20.0 25.9
Tenth Decile class 67,613 96,759 142,834 43.1 47.6
Statistics/
Income decile class
CARAGA% change
2003 2006 2009
In CARAGA, the average per capita income of families belonging to the 1st to 2nd decileclasses did not increase as fast as the increase in the prices of food, while the averageper capita income of families belonging to 3rd to 4th decile classes rose faster than the
prices of all items.
II. The 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
II The 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
71/120
71Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
03-06 06-09
Food Threshold 6,809 8,699 11,291 27.8 29.8
Subsistence Incidence
(among families) 7.3 11.6 8.5 4.3 (3.1)
Inflation (food) 111.7 143.9 190.6 28.8 32.5
Poverty Threshold 9,664 12,358 16,334 27.9 32.2
Poverty Incidence
(among families) 25.0 36.5 38.1 11.4 1.7
Inflation (all items) 114.7 144.6 180.3 26.1 24.7
Mean per capita income
All income groups 16,371 16,809 21,273 2.7 26.6
First decile class 5,874 6,988 9,643 19.0 38.0
Second decile class 7,987 9,054 12,636 13.4 39.6
Third decile class 9,549 10,624 14,213 11.3 33.8
Fourth Decile class 10,998 12,090 15,985 9.9 32.2Fifth Decile class 12,371 13,491 17,628 9.1 30.7
Sixth Decile class 14,288 15,132 19,582 5.9 29.4
Seventh Decile class 16,532 17,128 21,697 3.6 26.7
Eighth Decile class 20,108 19,955 24,940 (0.8) 25.0
Ninth Decile class 26,935 24,768 31,429 (8.0) 26.9
Tenth Decile class 54,428 53,019 63,054 (2.6) 18.9
% change2003 2006 2009
ARMMStatistics/
Income decile class
In ARMM, the average per capita income of the bottom 10% of families rose faster thanthe prices of food, while the average per capita income of families belonging to the 1st
to 4th decile classes rose faster than the prices of all items.
II. The 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
II Highlights of the 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
72/120
72Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
Some positive events between 2006 and 2009:
Period Event
July 2009 Increase in the salaries of government employees withthe implementation of the 1st of four parts of the SalaryStandardization Law III.
2008 Conditional cash transfer (CCT) implemented in 161municipalities in 2008 41.6% in Luzon, 14.9% in
Visayas, and 43.5% in Mindanao.2009 CCT was implemented in 277 municipalities 36.5% in
Luzon, 22.4% in Visayas, and 41.1% in Mindanao.
February2009
Start of application for the Project on Nurses Assignedin Rural Service by the DOLE, DOH, and theProfessional Regulation Commission, Board of Nursing(PRC-BON). The Project involved thetraining/deployment of unemployed registered nurses inthe 1,000 poorest cities/municipalities of the country.
II. Highlights of the 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
II Highlights of the 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
73/120
73Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
Some negative events between 2006 and 2009:
Period Event
2006-2009 Rice price crisis: Price of ordinary riceincreased by 44.2%, from PhP 21.28/kgin 2006 to PhP 30.69 in 2009
2008 Global financial crisis
June 2009 Start of El Nio
July 2009 Start of the increase in alert level ofMayon Volcano
II. Highlights of the 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
II Highlights of the 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
74/120
74Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
Some negative events between 2006 and 2009:
Some typhoons/calamities in 2009
Typhoon/Calamity Period Covered Estimated Cost ofDamage
Area(s) affected
1. Pepeng Sept. 24 - 27,2009
PhP 27.195 billion NCR, CAR, I, II, III,IV-A, IV-B, V, IX
2. Ondoy Sept. 30 Oct.11, 2009
PhP 11.121 billion NCR, CAR, I, II, III,IV-A, IV-B, V, IX
3. Ramil Oct. 20-26, 2009 PhP 87 million inCagayan Valley
CAR, Regions Iand II
II. Highlights of the 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
II Highlights of the 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
75/120
75Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
With the latest 2009 poverty estimates, the probability of
halving poverty, between 1990 and 2015, has gone down butremains at medium!
Indicator Target 1991 2003 2006 2009
Povertyincidence
amongpopulation
16.6 33.1
(Baseline) 24.9 26.4 26.5
Pace ofProgress
0.99 0.65 0.53
Notes: The pace of progress is computed as the ratio of the actual annual growth rate and required annual growthrate.
High: Pace of Progress is greater than 0.9
Medium: Pace of Progress between 0.5 and 0.9
Low: Pace of Progress is less than 0.5
II. Highlights of the 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
II Highlights of the 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
76/120
76Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
Actual Target (given the present
performance)Poverty Incidence amongpopulation
Percentage pointdecrease
Poverty Incidenceamong population
Percentage pointdecrease
1991 33.1 Annual reduction of0.37 percentage
points, between1991-2009, from abaseline of 33.1
0.69 annually,
between 1991-2015, from abaseline of 33.1
2003 24.9
2006 26.4
2009 26.5 20.72012 18.6 1.65 annually,
between 2009-2015, from abaseline of 26.5
2015 16.6
M DG Pe rform a nce a nd Ta rge ts on M DG 1, Ta rge t 1 , Ind ica tor 1
Target red uct ion in poor p opulat ion
Populat ion Target pove rty inciden ce
An nua l Cum ulat ive
20 1 0 1 ,59 8 ,22 4 2 5 .0 5
20 1 1 1 ,62 8 ,37 2 3 ,22 6 ,59 7 2 3 .3 5
20 1 2 1 ,65 8 ,67 1 4 ,88 5 ,26 8 2 1 .6 5
20 1 3 1 ,68 9 ,11 3 6 ,57 4 ,38 1 1 9 .9 5
20 1 4 1 ,71 9 ,68 9 8 ,29 4 ,07 1 1 8 .2 5
20 1 5 1 ,75 0 ,41 0 1 0 ,0 4 4 ,4 81 1 6 .5 5
II. Highlights of the 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
II Highlights of the 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
77/120
77Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
As of 2009, the Philippines was eight years behind target onpoverty reduction!
Only NCR, CAR, Regions II and IV-A are ahead of their targets!
-8.4
5.0
0.5
-2.3
0.5
-3.8
3.2
-8.3-9.6
-5.6
-10.2
-14.1-12.0
-8.3
-4.0
-20.0
-15.0
-10.0
-5.0
0.0
5.0
10.0
Philip
pine
sNC
RCA
R
Region
I
Region
II
Region
III
R
egio
nIV
-A
R
egio
nIV
-B
Region
V
Region
VI
Region
VII
Region
VIII
Region
X
Region
XI
Region
XII
Notes: Time-distance (years): positive (+) time lead (progress is ahead the path to target)
Negative ( - ) time lag (Progress is behind the path to target)
The time distance is a new generic statistical measure for analysis and visualization of time series data. This was firstdeveloped by Prof. Pavle Sicherl of the University of Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Region IX, Caraga, and ARMM are 27, 21, and 81 years behind the target in 2009.
II. Highlights of the 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
II Highlights of the 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
78/120
78Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
In terms of poverty incidence among population in ASEAN countries,the Philippines is better off than Lao PDR, Myanmar, and Cambodia;but behind Vietnam (14.5%) and Indonesia (14.2%).
CountryPoverty Incidence
Among Popn.Year
Lao PDR 33.5 2003
Myanmar 32.0 2005
Cambodia 30.1 2007
Philippines 26.5 2009
Vietnam 14.5 2008
Indonesia 14.2 2009
Thailand 8.5 2008
Malaysia 3.6 2007
Brunei Darussalam Singapore
Note: Brunei Darussalam is a regional member of ADB, but is not classified as a developing member country.
Sources: Millennium Indicators Database Online (UNSD 2010), Pacific Regional Information System (SPC 2010), country
sources. (http://www.adb.org/documents/books/key_indicators/2010/pdf/Key-Indicators-2010.pdf )
II. Highlights of the 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
II Highlights of the 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
79/120
79Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
II. Highlights of the 2009 Official Poverty Statistics
101010061321321380.4510.4440.40610. Myanmar
LOW HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
998011241241230.4940.4890.4669. Cambodia
889141221231260.4970.4900.4608. Lao People's DemocraticRepublic
777011131131140.5720.5660.5407. Viet Nam
666221081101100.6000.5930.5616. Indonesia
555-1-29796950.6380.6350.6195. Philippines
444019292930.6540.6480.6314. Thailand
MEDIUM HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
3331-25758550.7440.7390.7263. MalaysiaHIGH HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
222-1-53736320.8050.8040.8012. Brunei Darussalam
111012727280.8460.8410.8261. Singapore
VERY HIGH HUMANDEVELOPMENT
2010200920052009-2010
2005-2010
201020092005201020092005
10 ASEAN membercountriesChange169 countries
HDI Rank out ofHDI rankHDI Rank out of
HDI
Countries
In terms of the Human Development Index (HDI) in ASEAN countries, the Philippines iscategorized in countries with medium human development together with Thailand, Indonesia,Vietnam, Lao PDR and Cambodia.
III Some Policy/Program Implications
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
80/120
80Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
18.7
7.37.57.47.38.0
22.6
19.3 19.1
21.1 21.0320.9
0
5
10
15
20
25
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Unemployment Rate
Underemployment Rate
Poverty Incidence amongfamilies
Proportion of poor families declined from 21.1 in 2006 to 20.9 in 2009, consistentwith the declining trend in underemployment rate and unemployment rate, whichwent down from 22.6 to 19.1 and 8.0 to 7.5, respectively from 2006 to 2009!
III. Some Policy/Program Implications
-0 .2
A . Po ve rty a n d Un em p lo yme n t/ Un d e re m p lo ym e n t: N e e d fo r q u a litye m p l o y m e n t
III. Some Policy/Program Implications
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
81/120
81Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
5,7986,058
5,7986,0585,6204
5,7986,0589,8357
5,7986,05811,2408
5,7986,0588,4306
5,7986,0584,2153
5,7986,0582,8102
5,7986,0581,4051
7,0255
Agriculture (PhP 223/day)Non-agriculture (PhP 233/day)
Required monthlyincome (in PhP)
Family size Monthly Income of a Minimum Wage Earner in 2009
REGIONAL (FOR Caraga): A minimum wage earner* in Caraga can support a family of at most fourmembers in 2009, to be classified as non-poor! However, average family size in Caraga is 5. Minimumwage should have been at least PhP270/day in 2009 in order to support a family of 5 members. For 2011,
it should be at least PhP290/day. This m ea ns tha t the m in im um wa ge a s o f 2010 o f Php233 fora griculture a nd Php 243 for non-a gric ulture should b e inc rea se d b y Php57 a nd Php47 or 24 .5% a nd19.3%, respe c tive ly , to supp ort a fa m ily of five m e m be rs.
Minimum wage earner in Caraga employed in the agriculture and non-agriculture sector.
Rate is effective 20 June 2008, per Wage order No. 9 (Source of data:http://www.nwpc.dole.gov.ph/pages/statistics/stat_wage%20rates1989-present_non-agri.html )
For this exercise, number of working days considered in a month is 26.
Gross famil income was used.
B. Pove rty a nd M inim um Wa ge -Se tting: Ne e d for m ore p ove rty-se nsitive m inim um w a ge
III. Some Policy/Program Implications
III. Some Policy/Program Implications
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
82/120
82Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
5,4605,460
5,4605,4605,4444
5,4605,4609,5277
5,4605,46010,8888
5,4605,4608,1666
5,4605,4604,0833
5,4605,4602,7222
5,4605,4601,3611
6,8055
Agriculture (PhP 210/day)Non-agriculture (PhP 210/day)
Required monthlyincome (in PhP)
Family size Monthly Income of a Minimum Wage Earner in 2009
REGIONAL (FOR ARMM): A minimum wage earner* in ARMM can support a family of at most fourmembers in 2009, to be classified as non-poor! However, average family size in ARMM is 5. Minimumwage should have been at least PhP262/day in 2009 in order to support a family of 5 members. For2011, it should be at least PhP286/day. This means that the minimum wage as of 2010 of Php222 for
agriculture and non-agriculture should be increased by Php64.00 or 28.8% to support a family of fivemembers.
Minimum wage earner in ARMM employed in the agriculture and non-agriculture sector.
Rate is effective 29 June 2008, per Wage order No. 11 (Source of data:http://www.nwpc.dole.gov.ph/pages/statistics/stat_wage%20rates1989-present_non-agri.html )
For this exercise, number of working days considered in a month is 26.
Gross famil income was used.
y g p
B. Pove rty a nd M inim um Wa ge -Se tting: Ne e d for m ore p ove rty-se nsitive m inim um w a ge
III. Some Policy/Program Implications
7/30/2019 2009 Philippine Poverty Statistics
83/120
83Human Development C luster Meet ingRAVirola/ 17 Ma rch 2011
NA TIO NA L STATISTIC AL CO O RDINATIO N BO ARD
5,5906,240
5,5906,2405,0524
5,5906,2408,8417
5,5906,24010,1048
5,5906,2407,5786
5,5906,2403,7893
5,5906,2402,5262
5,5906,2401,2631
6,3155
Agriculture (PhP 215/day)Non-agriculture (PhP 240/day)
Required monthlyincome (in PhP)
Family size Monthly Income of a Minimum Wage Earner in 2009
REGIONAL (FOR Region IX): A minimum wage earner* in Region IX can support a family of at mostfour members in 2009, to be classified as non-poor! However, average family size in Region IX is 5.Minimum wage should have been at least PhP243/day in 2009 in order to support a family of 5members. For 2011, it should be at least PhP259/day. This m ea ns tha t the m in im um wa ge as o f 2010
of Php 230 for ag riculture a nd PHP255 for non -a griculture should b e inc rea sed by Php29 a nd Php4 o r12.6% an d 1 .6%, re spe c tive ly , to supp ort a fa m ily of five m e m be rs .