38

2012-2013 preliminary Accreditation Data

  • Upload
    jamese

  • View
    38

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

2012-2013 preliminary Accreditation Data. Suffolk Public Schools School Board August 9, 2012. Determining School Accreditation. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: 2012-2013   preliminary  Accreditation Data
Page 2: 2012-2013   preliminary  Accreditation Data

2012-2013 PRELIMINARY

ACCREDITATION DATA

Suffolk Public SchoolsSchool Board

August 9, 2012

Page 3: 2012-2013   preliminary  Accreditation Data

3

Determining School Accreditation

• Based on the percentage of students passing the Standards of Learning (SOL) assessment tests in the four core academic areas

• Calculated on the current year's scores or a trailing three-year average

Page 4: 2012-2013   preliminary  Accreditation Data

2012-2013 Accreditation Benchmarks

Note: Ratings for the 2012-2013 school year are based on achievement during 2011-2012 or on average achievement during the three most recent school years.

Accreditation Benchmarks Changes for the 2013-2014:Science and history and social science, the third grade pass rate will increase from 50 percent to 70 percent.

English, the pass rate for grades six through twelve will increase from 70 percent to 75 percent.

SUBJECT Grade 3 Grade 4-5 Grades 6-12

English 75% 75% 70%

Mathematics 70% 70% 70%

Science 50% 70% 70%

History 50% 70% 70%

4

Page 5: 2012-2013   preliminary  Accreditation Data

High School:

Is based on the percentage of students graduating from or completing high school based on a Graduation and Completion Index (GCI) prescribed by the state board of education.

5

Determining School Accreditation

Page 6: 2012-2013   preliminary  Accreditation Data

6

2011 – 2012PRELIMINARY

SOL TEST RESULTS

- DIVISION LEVEL -- GRADE LEVEL -

Page 7: 2012-2013   preliminary  Accreditation Data

2011-2012 COMBINED SOL STUDENT

PERFORMANCE

Reading

Writing

MathHistor

yScienc

e

ELEM 87% 87% 70% 83% 86%

MIDDLE 84% 86% 70% 76% 94%

HIGH 86% 93% 39% 67% 81%

7

Page 8: 2012-2013   preliminary  Accreditation Data

Reading Writing Math Science History

2009-10 0.850000000000001

0.91 0.92 0.860000000000001

0.850000000000001

2010-11 0.840000000000001

0.870000000000002

0.820000000000001

0.890000000000001

0.78

2011-12 0.860000000000001

0.890000000000001

0.580000000000001

0.850000000000001

0.750000000000002

55%

65%

75%

85%

95%

2010-2012 SOL STUDENT PERFORMANCE DIVISION-WIDE

8

Page 9: 2012-2013   preliminary  Accreditation Data

Reading Writing Math History Science

2009-10 0.820000000000001

0.850000000000001

0.92 0.870000000000002

0.860000000000001

2010-11 0.830000000000001

0.860000000000001

0.91 0.750000000000002

0.870000000000002

2011-12 0.870000000000002

0.870000000000002

0.700000000000001

0.830000000000001

0.860000000000001

65%

75%

85%

95%

2010-2012 SOL STUDENT PERFORMANCE

ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS

9

Page 10: 2012-2013   preliminary  Accreditation Data

Reading Writing Math History Science

2009-10 0.870000000000003

0.9 0.830000000000001

0.870000000000003

0.9

2010-11 0.860000000000001

0.870000000000003

0.820000000000001

0.81 0.940000000000001

2011-12 0.850000000000001

0.860000000000001

0.710000000000001

0.760000000000004

0.940000000000001

65%

75%

85%

95%

2010-2012 SOL STUDENT PERFORMANCE

MIDDLE SCHOOLS

10

Page 11: 2012-2013   preliminary  Accreditation Data

Reading Writing Math History Science

2009-10 0.88 0.940000000000001

0.710000000000001

0.870000000000002

0.830000000000001

2010-11 0.89 0.91 0.760000000000002

0.740000000000002

0.88

2011-12 0.860000000000001

0.93 0.390000000000001

0.670000000000003

0.81

35%

45%

55%

65%

75%

85%

95%

2010-2012 SOL STUDENT PERFORMANCE

HIGH SCHOOLS

11

Page 12: 2012-2013   preliminary  Accreditation Data

SOL STUDENT PERFORMANCEBY GRADE LEVEL

• READING• WRITING

• MATH• HISTORY

• SCIENCE

12

Page 13: 2012-2013   preliminary  Accreditation Data

Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 11

2010 Pass Rate

75 85 88 88 86 86 88

2011 Pass Rate

76 86 86 84 85 88 89

2012 Pass Rate

84 88 91 84 83 84 86

65

75

85

95

2010-2012 SOL Student Performance

in Reading

13

Page 14: 2012-2013   preliminary  Accreditation Data

CELEBRATIONS in English-Reading

• BTWES – Grade 3 increased 9%• CES – Grade 3 increased 10%• CES – Grade 5 increased 6%• DES – Grade 3 increased 11%• EFES – Grade 5 increased 16%• HPES – Grade 4 increased 6%• KSES – Grade 3 increased 14%• KSES – Grade 5 increased 6%

14

Page 15: 2012-2013   preliminary  Accreditation Data

CELEBRATIONS in English-Reading

• MBJrES – Grade 3 increased 15%

• MBJrES – Grade 5 increased 11%

• NPES – Grade 3 increased 10%

• NPES – Grade 5 increased 10%

• NSES – Grade 5 increased 8%• OES – Grade 5 increased 11%• SWES – Grade 3 increased

14%• JFKMS – Grade 6 increased

6%• JFKMS – Grade 7 increased

5%

15

Page 16: 2012-2013   preliminary  Accreditation Data

Grade 5 Grade 8 Grade 11

2010 Pass Rate 89 90 94

2011 Pass Rate 85 86 91

2012 Pass Rate 87 86 93

65

75

85

95

2010-2012 SOL Student Performance

in Writing

16

Page 17: 2012-2013   preliminary  Accreditation Data

CELEBRATIONS in English-Writing

• DES – Grade 5 increased 7%• EFES – Grade 5 increased

7%• KSES – Grade 5 increased

7%• NPES – Grade 5 increased

8%• OES – Grade 5 increased 5%

17

Page 18: 2012-2013   preliminary  Accreditation Data

Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Alg I Geom Alg II

2010 Pass Rate

90 91 93 75 83 81 89 63 72

2011 Pass Rate

92 93 89 73 69 88 92 70 72

2012 Pass Rate

64 74 73 80 49 65 48 46 36

35

45

55

65

75

85

95

2010-2012 SOL Student Performance

in Math

18

Page 19: 2012-2013   preliminary  Accreditation Data

CELEBRATIONS in Math

• NSES – Grade 5 Plain English Math increased 25%

• OES - Grade 4 Plain English Math increased 50%

• FGMS - Grade 6 Plain English Math increased 13%

• JFKMS - Grade 6 Math increased 17%• JYMS - Grade 6 Math increased 5%

19

Page 20: 2012-2013   preliminary  Accreditation Data

Grade 3 Va Stud-ies Grade

4

US Hist I Grade 5

US Hist II Grade 6

Civics/ Econ

Grade 7

WH I WH II US/VA

2010 Pass Rate

93 84 77 88 81 88 76 90

2011 Pass Rate

81 85 75 81 78 73 71 77

2012 Pass Rate

86 86 77 74 78 65 72 65

65

75

85

95

2010-2012 SOL Student Performance

in History

20

Page 21: 2012-2013   preliminary  Accreditation Data

CELEBRATIONS in History

• CES – Grade 3 increased 8%• EFES – Grade 4 Virginia Studies increased

5%• EFES – Grade 5 US History I increased 7%• HPES – Grade 3 History increased 9%• HPES – Grade 4 Virginia Studies increased

11%• HPES – Grade 5 US History I increased

26%• KSES – Grade 3 History increased 5%• MBJrES – Grade 4 Virginia Studies

increased 6%21

Page 22: 2012-2013   preliminary  Accreditation Data

CELEBRATIONS in History

• NPES – Grade 3 increased 8%• NPES – Grade 4 Virginia Studies increased

9%• NPES – Grade 5 US History I increased 8%• NSES – Grade 3 History increased 7%• NSES – Grade 5 US History I increased 6%• OES – Virginia Studies increased 8%• OES – Grade 5 US History I increased 19%• SWES – Grade 3 History increased 7%

22

Page 23: 2012-2013   preliminary  Accreditation Data

CELEBRATIONS in History

• JFKMS – Civics and Economics increased 10%

• KFHS – World History I increased 11%• KFHS – World History II increased 28%• LHS – World History II increased 12%

23

Page 24: 2012-2013   preliminary  Accreditation Data

Grade 3 Grade 5 Grade 8 Earth Sci-ence

Biology Chemistry

2010 Pass Rate 90 82 89 80 80 94

2011 Pass Rate 90 84 93 87 87 93

2012 Pass Rate 85 89 94 78 82 85

65

75

85

95

2010-2012 SOL Student Performance

in Science

24

Page 25: 2012-2013   preliminary  Accreditation Data

CELEBRATIONS in Science

• CES – Grade 5 increased 5%• EFES – Grade 5 increased 5%• HPES – Grade 5 increased 7%• KSES – Grade 5 increased 8%• MBJrES – Grade 5 increased

12%• NSES – Grade 5 increased 5%• OES – Grade 5 increased 10%• SWES – Grade 5 increased 5%• LHS – Biology increased 5%

25

Page 26: 2012-2013   preliminary  Accreditation Data

2011-2012 SOL Student Performance

by Elementary SchoolSCHOOL READING WRITING MATH HISTORY SCIENCE Accredited

StatusBTWES 81 76 80* 73 78 Fully

AccreditedCES 93 89 74 89 90 Fully

AccreditedDES/FBES

92 90 79 90 91 Fully Accredited

EFES 85 81 71 78 85 Fully Accredited

HPES 87 82 73 86 89 Fully Accredited

KSES 88 84 84* 83 88 Fully Accredited

MBJRES 90 81 72 82 88 Fully Accredited

NPES 88 85 72 81 81 Fully Accredited

NSES 94 90 82 92 92 Fully Accredited

OES 94 85 82 95 92 Fully Accredited

SWES 87 92 82* 82 92 Fully Accredited

NOTE: * Indicates the Alternate Benchmark (Three Year Average) was needed.

26

Page 27: 2012-2013   preliminary  Accreditation Data

2011-2012 SOL Student Performance

by Middle SchoolSCHOOL READING WRITING MATH HISTORY SCIENCE

Accredited Status

FGMS 87 86 80 85 95 Fully Accredited

JFKMS 84 82 71* 71* 94 Fully Accredited

JYMS 91 90 81 82 96 Fully Accredited

KFMS 79 86 77* 71 92 Fully Accredited

NOTE: * Indicates the Alternate Benchmark (Three Year Average) was needed.

27

Page 28: 2012-2013   preliminary  Accreditation Data

2011-2012 SOL Student Performance

by High School

Notes:1. * - Indicates the Alternate Benchmark (Three Year Average).

2. Accredited with Warning – Pass rates are below the achievement levels required for full accreditation. Schools must undergo academic reviews and are required to adopt and implement school improvement plans. Schools that are Accredited with Warning in English and/or mathematics also are required to adopt instructional programs proven by research to be effective in raising achievement in these subjects.

3. The Graduation and Completion Index (GCI) data for the high schools is not available. The data will be calculated following the completion of summer school and the submission of the summer student record collection in August.

SCHOOL READING WRITING MATH HISTORY SCIENCE Accredited

Status

KFHS 90 92 68* 82 90 Accredited with Warning in Math

LHS 92 91 66* 74 87 Accredited with Warning in Math

NRHS 93 95 79* 89 94 Fully Accredited

28

Page 29: 2012-2013   preliminary  Accreditation Data

29

Action Steps

Page 30: 2012-2013   preliminary  Accreditation Data

30

• Analyze district Student Performance By Question (SPBQ) reporting category and SPBQ reports to identify areas of strength and improvement

• Continue to develop additional Technology Enhanced Items

• “Look-a-like” problems are being used as the framework for the pre-assessments and have been placed in curriculum management for teacher use.

Action Steps Focused on Enhancing the Math Results

Page 31: 2012-2013   preliminary  Accreditation Data

31

• Conduct a Needs Assessments of all teachers who teach math

• Create Professional Development sessions based on the results of the Needs Assessment

• Increase monitoring of teachers’ evidence of re-teaching and remediation (building administrators and central office administrators)

Action Steps Focused on Enhancing the Math Results

Page 32: 2012-2013   preliminary  Accreditation Data

32

Action Steps Focused on the Revised English and Science Standards

SOL English Standards:• Adopted in 2010 and Implemented in 2011• Field tested new online writing tool in 2012• Field tested new reading & writing content in 2012• SOL tested in 2013

SOL Science Standards:• Adopted in 2010 and Implemented in 2011• Field tested new content in 2012• SOL tested in 2013

Page 33: 2012-2013   preliminary  Accreditation Data

33

Action Steps Focused on the Revised English and Science Standards

Beginning in 2010, committees created:

• Action plans & Time tables

• Crosswalks comparison-- Integrated critical portions of new standards without deleting current standards

• Scope and sequences

Page 34: 2012-2013   preliminary  Accreditation Data

34

Action Steps Focused on the Revised English and Science Standards

Beginning in 2010, committees also created:

• Pacing guides

• Updated student review notes -- Infused certain critical standards one year in advance of testing

• Lessons & labs developed and included in teachers' curriculum guides in science

Page 35: 2012-2013   preliminary  Accreditation Data

35

Other action steps:

• Teachers shared best practices

• Students provided chance to use new online writing practice tool provided by VDOE in 2012 during SOL Writing field test

Action Steps Focused on the Revised English and Science Standards

Page 36: 2012-2013   preliminary  Accreditation Data

36

Other action steps:

• Provide students with practice using Technology Enhanced Practice Items provided by VDOE

• Update division tests and quizzes to align with Technology Enhanced Items formatting

Action Steps Focused on the Revised English and Science Standards

Page 37: 2012-2013   preliminary  Accreditation Data

QUESTIONS?

37

Page 38: 2012-2013   preliminary  Accreditation Data