2016 Cotton Variety Testing Results - University of Arizona › sites › extension... · Cotton Variety Testing Results 2016 Introduction Variety selection is one of the most important

1 University of Arizona College of Agriculture and Life Sciences

Cotton Variety Testing Results

Cooperative ExtensionAgricultural Experiment Station

The University of Arizona, TucsonU.S. Department of Agriculture

2016



Cotton Variety Testing Results2016

IntroductionVariety selection is one of the most important decisions a grower will make contributing to the success

of a cotton crop. It is critical, that a grower have as much information as possible in order to make an informed decision regarding variety selection.

In an effort to help supply reliable variety performance information, the University of Arizona conducts a statewide Upland cotton variety testing program. This program consists of a few different types of trials. The first is a small plot evaluation of commercially available varieties along with experimental varieties, and is conducted in 3 locations across Arizona including; Yuma, Maricopa, and Safford. This testing program is called the University of Arizona Upland Cotton Advanced Strains Testing Program.

Another type of University sponsored trial is a large plot, replicated strip trial conducted on grower cooperator farms in a wide variety of locations across Arizona. These large plot strip trials consist of replicated plots extending the full length of the irrigation run at each location. This program is titled the University of Arizona Upland Cotton Variety Testing Program (UCVT). Eight locations across the state were conducted in 2016.

The table found below contains location, planting date, early and mid-season data collection dates, final irrigation date, initial defoliation date, harvest date, soil type, and irrigation technique, for each of the trials conducted across Arizona in 2016. The remainder of the tables in this publication contain yield and fiber quality data for each of the locations. Statistical analysis for all parameters is presented at the bottom of each table. Included this year are early season data of stand count and vigor ratings along with mid-season data including plant height and nodes above white flower (NAWF) collected at early to mid bloom. For each location of the UCVT trial a figure plotting lint yield as a function of fiber premium/discount is presented. The vertical line represents the average of the trial for fiber premium and the horizontal line represents the trial average for yield. Any varieties falling in the upper right quadrant performed better than average for both lint yield and fiber quality at that location. If you have any questions regarding these trials or this publication please direct them to Dr. Randy Norton, Regional Extension Specialist and Director of the Safford Ag Center at [email protected].

The work performed over the course of the 2016 cotton season to produce the results contained in this booklet was funded in part by Cotton Incorporated through the Arizona Cotton Growers Association and also by participating seed companies.

Team membersRandy Norton, editorRegional Extension SpecialistAyman MostafaAssistant Area Agent, Agriculture, Maricopa County


Loca

tion

and

agro

nom

ic in

form

atio

n fo

r the

Uni

vers

ity o

f Ariz

ona

Upl

and

Cot

ton

Adva

nced

Stra

in T

estin

g Pr

ogra

m, 2

016.

Loca

tion

Elev

ation

Latit

ude

Long

itude

Plan

ting

Date

Early

Sea

son

Data

Mid

-Sea

son

Data

Fina

l Irr

igati

onDe

folia

tion

Date

Harv

est D

ate

Soil

Type

Irrig

ation

Tech

niqu

eYu

ma

121

32.7

09-1

14.7

055/

17/2

016

6/7/

2016

7/7/

2016

10/5

/201

611

/15/

2016

12/1

9/20

16Ga

dsde

n Cl

ayFu

rrow

Mar

icop

a11

9133

.063

-111

.971

4/26

/201

66/

13/2

016

7/14

/201

69/

8/20

1610

/28/

2016

11/2

8/20

16Ca

sa G

rand

e Sa

ndy

Clay

Loa

mFu

rrow

Saffo

rd29

6032

.813

-109

.679

5/5/

2016

6/6/

2016

7/6/

2016

9/6/

2016

10/2

3/20

1611

/17/

2016

Grab

e Cl

ay L

oam

Furr

ow

Loca

tion

and

agro

nom

ic in

form

atio

n fo

r the

Uni

vers

ity o

f Ariz

ona

Upl

and

Cot

ton

Varie

ty T

estin

g (U

CVT

) Pro

gram

, 201

6.

Loca

tion

Elev

ation

Latit

ude

Long

itude

Plan

ting

Date

Early

Sea

son

Data

Mid

-Sea

son

Data

Fina

l Irr

igati

onDe

folia

tion

Date

Harv

est D

ate

Soil

Type

Irrig

ation

Tech

niqu

eYu

ma

111

32.6

42-1

14.6

763/

16/2

016

4/19

/201

6---

8/2/

2016

9/2/

2016

9/21

/201

6Cl

ayFu

rrow

Good

year

923

33.4

02-1

12.3

805/

26/2

016

---8/

10/2

016

9/15

/201

610

/27/

2016

12/1

/201

6Lo

amFl

ood

Eloy

1498

32.8

41-1

11.5

025/

11/2

016

6/2/

2016

7/19

/201

69/

20/2

016

11/1

5/20

1612

/13/

2016

Sand

y Lo

amFu

rrow

Que

en C

reek

1548

33.1

69-1

11.4

974/

15/2

016

6/2/

2016

6/29

/201

69/

12/2

016

10/2

1/20

1611

/15/

2016

Loam

Furr

owRe

d Ro

ck18

5132

.545

-111

.357

5/5/

2016

6/2/

2016

7/19

/201

69/

12/2

016

10/2

4/20

1611

/14/

2016

Sand

y Lo

amFu

rrow

Mar

ana

2011

32.4

38-1

11.1

954/

19/2

016

6/2/

2016

7/14

/201

69/

15/2

016

10/3

/201

610

/17/

2016

Sand

y Lo

amFu

rrow

That

cher

2872

32.8

60-1

09.7

724/

29/2

016

6/14

/201

67/

20/2

016

9/16

/201

610

/3/2

016

10/2

1/20

16Cl

ay L

oam

Subs

urfa

ce D

ripW

illco

x40

7932

.012

-109

.080

4/14

/201

66/

15/2

016

7/28

/201

69/

4/20

1610

/15/

2016

11/7

/201

6Si

lty C

lay

Loam

Cent

er P

ivot


Yiel

d an

d fib

er q

ualit

y da

ta fo

r the

Uni

vers

ity o

f Ariz

ona

Upl

and

Cot

ton

Adva

nced

Stra

in T

estin

g Pr

ogra

m, Y

uma,

AZ

2016

.

See

d C

ompa

nyVa

riety

Lint

Yie

ld (l

bs/

acre

)Yi

eld

Mea

ns

Sep

arat

ion*

Per

cent

Li

ntC

olor

G

rade

Sta

ple

(32n

ds)

Mic

ro-

naire

Stre

ngth

(g

/tex)

Leng

th

(in.)

Leaf

G

rade

Uni

form

ity

Inde

x (%

)P

rem

ium

(c

ents

/lb)

Valu

e**

($/a

cre)

Am

eric

ot/N

exG

enA

MX

1601

B2X

F1,

943.

3a

43.2

3139

5.2

36.9

1.21

383

.72.

2$1

,054

.81

Mon

sant

o/D

elta

pine

DP

1725

B2X

F1,

671.

2b

44.6

3139

4.8

34.1

1.22

381

.24.

3$9

40.6

4M

onsa

nto/

Del

tapi

neD

P15

49B

2XF

1,59

4.0

bc41

.031

394.

735

.31.

203

81.1

4.3

$896

.70

Pre

miu

m C

otto

n G

enet

ics

0708

-806

-W90

31,

496.

2bc

d37

.031

385.

135

.11.

203

81.9

2.2

$810

.59

Mon

sant

o/D

elta

pine

DP

1044

B2R

F1,

488.

9bc

d38

.731

385.

134

.31.

193

81.0

1.6

$796

.96

Mon

sant

o/D

elta

pine

15R

556B

2XF

1,48

0.2

bcd

47.7

3139

5.0

36.5

1.21

382

.53.

1$8

13.5

7A

mer

icot

/Nex

Gen

NG

5007

B2X

F1,

466.

3bc

d41

.931

394.

632

.31.

213

80.3

3.5

$814

.30

Am

eric

ot/N

exG

enN

G34

06B

2XF

1,36

7.3

cde

42.3

3137

4.9

32.1

1.15

382

.42.

9$7

50.4

9B

ayer

FM19

53G

LTP

1,36

5.3

cde

41.1

3139

5.0

34.0

1.20

382

.12.

8$7

47.3

4M

onsa

nto/

Del

tapi

ne16

R23

2B2X

F1,

353.

9cd

e41

.231

415.

138

.21.

263

81.3

2.2

$732

.53

Mon

sant

o/D

elta

pine

16R

228N

RB

2XF

1,32

3.3

def

46.3

3140

4.8

35.0

1.24

381

.53.

4$7

31.6

2M

onsa

nto/

Del

tapi

ne16

R25

2NR

B2X

F1,

308.

2de

fg42

.931

395.

135

.01.

213

82.2

2.6

$713

.02

Bay

er/F

iber

Max

FM18

30G

LT1,

302.

5de

fg41

.731

385.

034

.71.

203

83.3

3.2

$718

.96

Mon

sant

o/D

elta

pine

16R

225N

RB

2XF

1,29

4.1

defg

46.8

3139

4.8

34.7

1.23

381

.73.

4$7

14.2

3M

onsa

nto/

Del

tapi

ne16

R24

2NR

B2X

F1,

262.

1de

fgh

41.6

3139

5.2

37.8

1.23

381

.61.

7$6

77.8

8B

ayer

BX

1737

GLT

1,17

1.3

efgh

i40

.031

395.

133

.21.

213

81.6

1.7

$628

.51

Mon

sant

o/D

elta

pine

16R

229B

2XF

1,14

8.2

efgh

ij41

.131

364.

932

.91.

133

81.6

2.9

$629

.37

Am

eric

ot/N

exG

enN

G45

45B

2XF

1,13

1.0

efgh

ijk39

.831

384.

635

.01.

203

81.8

4.7

$641

.27

Bay

erB

X17

75G

LTP

1,11

0.0

fghi

jk39

.031

394.

733

.71.

233

81.7

4.3

$624

.37

Bay

er/S

tone

ville

ST4

949G

LT1,

105.

0fg

hijk

42.4

3138

4.9

34.1

1.20

382

.13.

6$6

13.1

2B

ayer

ST5

020G

LT1,

104.

5fg

hijk

42.0

3139

4.8

35.3

1.21

381

.23.

3$6

10.9

4B

ayer

/Sto

nevi

lleS

T494

6GLB

21,

093.

7fg

hijk

42.5

3138

4.8

35.4

1.18

381

.73.

6$6

09.7

3P

rem

ium

Cot

ton

Gen

etic

s07

13-8

06-W

903

1,08

0.0

ghijk

35.6

3139

5.1

35.6

1.22

381

.13.

0$5

93.3

7M

onsa

nto/

Del

tapi

neD

P17

47N

RB

2XF

1,04

1.2

hijk

45.3

3138

5.2

35.1

1.19

382

.02.

6$5

68.5

7A

mer

icot

/Nex

Gen

NG

3517

B2X

F1,

019.

1ijk

38.7

3138

4.4

34.5

1.20

381

.33.

8$5

67.7

5A

mer

icot

/Nex

Gen

NG

3500

XF

991.

1ijk

l42

.331

384.

835

.61.

203

82.2

3.6

$550

.10

Mon

sant

o/D

elta

pine

16R

251N

RB

2XF

978.

7ijk

l46

.431

404.

735

.91.

253

81.3

4.3

$550

.89

Pre

miu

m C

otto

n G

enet

ics

0708

-808

-W90

596

5.0

ijkl

33.3

3138

4.8

34.3

1.20

381

.53.

3$5

34.3

4P

rem

ium

Cot

ton

Gen

etic

s07

10-8

06-W

904

946.

1ijk

l33

.831

365.

234

.31.

143

82.2

2.0

$510

.36

Bay

erB

X17

33G

LT94

5.8

ijkl

41.2

3137

4.9

33.6

1.17

381

.82.

7$5

18.2

6P

rem

ium

Cot

ton

Gen

etic

s07

02-8

05-W

901

907.

0jk

l32

.231

404.

838

.51.

253

81.3

3.9

$507

.22

Bay

erB

X17

74G

LTP

904.

6kl

38.4

3138

4.7

32.6

1.19

382

.44.

7$5

12.5

2B

ayer

BX

1739

GLT

755.

4l

42.1

3139

5.1

35.0

1.22

381

.32.

6$4

11.2

9Av

erag

e1,

213.

541

.1--

-38

4.9

34.8

1.20

---

81.7

3.1

$668

.49

LSD

§24

2.9

2.4

---

10.

42.

20.

03--

-N

SN

S$1

31.9

2O

SL†

<0.0

001

<0.0

001

---

<0.0

001

0.00

5<0

.000

1<0

.000

1--

-0.

558

0.08

6<0

.000

1C

V‡

14.2

4.2

---

2.1

6.1

4.5

1.8

---

1.7

45.5

14.0

*Mea

ns fo

llow

ed b

y th

e sa

me

lette

r are

not

sig

nific

antly

diff

eren

t by

Fish

er’s

Pro

tect

ed L

SD

at α

= 0

.05.

**

Valu

e ca

lcul

ated

from

CC

C lo

an s

ched

ule

base

pric

e of

$0.

52/lb

+ p

rem

ium

/dis

coun

t§

Leas

t Sig

nific

ant D

iffer

ence

† O

bser

ved

Sig

nific

ance

Lev

el‡

Coe

ffici

ent o

f Var

iatio

n

Cotto

n Va

riety

Testi

ng R

esult

s20

16


Varie

tyPl

ant P

opul

ation

(p

lant

s/fo

ot)

Plan

t Vig

or R

ating

(0

-9 L

-H)

Plan

t Hei

ght

(inch

es)

Nod

es A

bove

Whi

te

Flow

er (N

AWF)

0702

-805

-W90

13.

67.

355

.45.

307

08-8

06-W

903

3.1

8.0

49.3

4.9

0708

-808

-W90

53.

67.

356

.05.

407

10-8

06-W

904

3.5

7.7

52.1

4.5

0713

-806

-W90

33.

67.

054

.86.

215

R556

B2XF

2.4

4.7

52.3

4.8

16R2

25N

RB2X

F2.

66.

052

.46.

316

R228

NRB

2XF

2.7

5.3

51.2

5.6

16R2

29B2

XF2.

55.

350

.35.

616

R232

B2XF

3.3

7.3

59.0

5.9

16R2

42N

RB2X

F3.

26.

351

.35.

216

R251

NRB

2XF

3.1

6.0

51.2

5.4

16R2

52N

RB2X

F3.

26.

754

.25.

8AM

X160

1B2X

F2.

45.

349

.64.

7BX

1733

GLT

3.2

6.7

49.8

5.4

BX17

37GL

T3.

47.

352

.24.

9BX

1739

GLT

2.7

6.0

56.6

5.7

BX17

74GL

TP3.

56.

749

.34.

7BX

1775

GLTP

3.8

7.7

53.4

5.3

DP10

44B2

RF3.

46.

750

.05.

4DP

1549

B2XF

3.2

6.7

54.5

5.9

DP17

25B2

XF3.

06.

052

.55.

1DP

1747

NRB

2XF

2.6

6.0

52.5

5.6

FM18

30GL

T2.

95.

350

.95.

1FM

1953

GLTP

3.7

7.3

50.2

5.7

NG3

406B

2XF

3.3

7.3

53.1

5.0

NG3

500X

F3.

57.

050

.85.

2N

G351

7B2X

F3.

37.

053

.54.

8N

G454

5B2X

F2.

96.

354

.75.

3N

G500

7B2X

F2.

66.

052

.05.

7ST

4946

GLB2

3.1

6.3

49.7

4.6

ST49

49GL

T1.

84.

754

.15.

0ST

5020

GLT

3.4

7.0

51.4

5.0

Mea

n3.

16.

552

.55.

3

Cotto

n Va

riety

Testi

ng R

esult

s20

16Ea

rly a

nd m

id-s

easo

n da

ta c

olle

cted

for t

he U

nive

rsity

of A

rizon

a U

plan

d C

otto

n Ad

vanc

ed S

train

Tes

ting

Prog

ram

, Yum

a, A

Z 20

16.


Cotto

n Va

riety

Testi

ng R

esult

s20

16Yi

eld

and

fiber

qua

lity

data

for t

he U

nive

rsity

of A

rizon

a U

plan

d C

otto

n Ad

vanc

ed S

train

Tes

ting

Prog

ram

, Mar

icop

a, A

Z 20

16.

See

d C

ompa

nyVa

riety

Lint

Yie

ld

(lbs/

acre

)Yi

eld

Mea

ns

Sep

arat

ion*

Per

cent

Li

ntC

olor

G

rade

Sta

ple

(32n

ds)

Mic

rona

ireS

treng

th

(g/te

x)Le

ngth

(in

.)Le

af

Gra

deU

nifo

rmity

In

dex

(%)

Pre

miu

m

(cen

ts/lb

)Va

lue*

* ($

/ac

re)

Mon

sant

o/D

elta

pine

16R

252N

RB

2XF

2,68

9.0

a43

.031

385.

133

.61.

163

81.5

2.3

$1,4

60.4

1M

onsa

nto/

Del

tapi

ne16

R22

8NR

B2X

F2,

667.

6a

44.0

3140

4.9

35.5

1.24

381

.43.

6$1

,484

.57

Mon

sant

o/D

elta

pine

DP

1549

B2X

F2,

648.

1a

39.9

3138

4.5

34.8

1.20

380

.33.

4$1

,467

.74

Mon

sant

o/D

elta

pine

DP

1747

NR

B2X

F2,

565.

0ab

44.0

3138

4.8

34.4

1.19

380

.43.

9$1

,433

.71

Mon

sant

o/D

elta

pine

16R

225N

RB

2XF

2,52

0.4

abc

43.8

3139

4.7

35.7

1.23

380

.83.

8$1

,404

.86

Mon

sant

o/D

elta

pine

16R

229B

2XF

2,46

9.5

abcd

41.7

3137

5.2

32.8

1.14

380

.91.

4$1

,318

.87

Mon

sant

o/D

elta

pine

DP

1725

B2X

F2,

396.

3bc

de42

.531

385.

032

.21.

193

79.7

2.6

$1,3

07.2

5M

onsa

nto/

Del

tapi

neD

P10

44B

2RF

2,37

7.2

bcde

f38

.331

385.

034

.21.

193

81.0

3.2

$1,3

10.4

6M

onsa

nto/

Del

tapi

ne16

R23

2B2X

F2,

375.

7bc

def

37.1

3140

5.0

36.2

1.24

380

.93.

8$1

,324

.13

Mon

sant

o/D

elta

pine

15R

556B

2XF

2,36

2.7

bcde

f44

.931

384.

633

.91.

203

80.8

4.5

$1,3

34.9

7B

ayer

BX

1733

GLT

2,34

9.1

bcde

fg39

.231

394.

734

.91.

223

79.6

3.8

$1,3

10.7

9B

ayer

ST4

949G

LT2,

344.

0bc

defg

h42

.831

375.

033

.41.

173

81.3

3.5

$1,2

98.8

4B

ayer

/Fib

erM

axFM

1830

GLT

2,32

6.0

cdef

gh41

.031

395.

034

.71.

233

80.6

3.2

$1,2

82.3

1A

mer

icot

/Nex

Gen

NG

5007

B2X

F2,

311.

2cd

efgh

i41

.731

394.

831

.91.

203

79.9

3.8

$1,2

90.1

5P

rem

ium

Cot

ton

Gen

etic

sP

CG

612

2,28

0.7

defg

hij

37.9

3138

5.4

35.2

1.19

380

.50.

7$1

,200

.40

Mon

sant

o/D

elta

pine

16R

242N

RB

2XF

2,26

8.0

defg

hij

40.5

3140

5.0

38.9

1.24

380

.82.

6$1

,238

.46

Mon

sant

o/D

elta

pine

16R

251N

RB

2XF

2,24

8.0

efgh

ij42

.631

404.

733

.41.

243

79.6

3.3

$1,2

41.4

3A

mer

icot

/Nex

Gen

AM

X16

01B

2XF

2,21

0.5

efgh

ijk41

.931

395.

035

.11.

203

81.0

3.3

$1,2

23.4

6B

ayer

ST5

020G

LT2,

198.

3ef

ghijk

40.2

3139

5.0

34.9

1.22

380

.33.

0$1

,207

.99

Pre

miu

m C

otto

n G

enet

ics

0713

-806

-W90

32,

189.

2ef

ghijk

36.8

3139

5.1

35.5

1.21

380

.81.

5$1

,169

.49

Am

eric

ot/N

exG

enN

G34

06B

2XF

2,17

1.7

fghi

jk39

.931

374.

932

.61.

163

82.2

3.7

$1,2

08.9

0P

rem

ium

Cot

ton

Gen

etic

sP

CG

604

2,13

6.5

ghijk

38.4

3139

4.7

35.3

1.23

380

.44.

0$1

,195

.34

Bay

erB

X17

37G

LT2,

123.

3hi

jkl

38.8

3139

4.6

32.9

1.23

380

.14.

0$1

,189

.65

Pre

miu

m C

otto

n G

enet

ics

PC

G60

52,

097.

3ijk

lm35

.831

395.

335

.51.

223

80.7

1.2

$1,1

16.1

3P

rem

ium

Cot

ton

Gen

etic

s07

13-8

09-W

904

2,09

2.5

ijklm

38.1

3138

5.4

34.3

1.19

380

.10.

6$1

,100

.46

Bay

erB

X17

75G

LTP

2,07

5.8

jklm

n39

.931

394.

732

.81.

223

80.3

3.3

$1,1

46.0

8A

mer

icot

/Nex

Gen

NG

4545

B2X

F1,

994.

5kl

mno

39.7

3138

4.7

34.4

1.19

380

.54.

1$1

,118

.58

Bay

erB

X17

76G

LTP

1,91

0.3

lmno

p38

.531

384.

932

.31.

193

80.4

3.5

$1,0

59.6

7B

ayer

BX

1774

GLT

P1,

895.

1nm

opq

38.5

3139

4.6

33.9

1.21

380

.34.

1$1

,062

.82

Pre

miu

m C

otto

n G

enet

ics

PC

G61

51,

862.

5no

pq36

.531

405.

234

.91.

243

81.1

1.7

$999

.42

Bay

erFM

1953

GLT

P1,

815.

2op

q38

.631

394.

534

.01.

223

80.1

4.0

$1,0

16.1

0A

mer

icot

/Nex

Gen

NG

3517

B2X

F1,

748.

4pq

37.6

3139

4.5

36.0

1.23

380

.84.

1$9

81.3

3A

mer

icot

/Nex

Gen

NG

3500

XF

1,69

7.6

pq39

.431

394.

836

.41.

213

81.1

3.8

$945

.52

Bay

erB

X17

39G

LT1,

683.

6q

42.4

3140

4.8

34.0

1.24

378

.92.

6$9

18.8

9Av

erag

e2,

208.

840

.2--

-39

4.9

34.4

1.21

---

80.6

3.1

$1,2

16.7

4LS

D§

221.

41.

7--

-1

0.3

1.7

0.04

---

1.0

1.50

$120

.36

OS

L†<0

.000

1<0

.000

1--

-<0

.000

1<0

.000

1<0

.000

1<0

.000

1--

-<0

.000

1<0

.000

1<0

.000

1C

V‡

7.1

3.0

---

2.4

4.8

3.5

2.2

---

0.9

34.3

7.1

*Mea

ns fo

llow

ed b

y th

e sa

me

lette

r are

not

sig

nific

antly

diff

eren

t by

Fish

er’s

Pro

tect

ed L

SD

at α

= 0

.05.

**

Valu

e ca

lcul

ated

from

CC

C lo

an s

ched

ule

base

pric

e of

$0.

52/lb

+ p

rem

ium

/dis

coun

t§

Leas

t Sig

nific

ant D

iffer

ence

† O

bser

ved

Sig

nific

ance

Lev

el‡

Coe

ffici

ent o

f Var

iatio

n


Cotto

n Va

riety

Testi

ng R

esult

s20

16Ea

rly a

nd m

id-s

easo

n da

ta c

olle

cted

for t

he U

nive

rsity

of A

rizon

a U

plan

d C

otto

n Ad

vanc

ed S

train

Tes

ting

Prog

ram

, Mar

icop

a, A

Z 20

16.

Varie

tyPl

ant P

opul

ation

(p

lant

s/fo

ot)

Plan

t Vig

or R

ating

(0

-9 L

-H)

Plan

t Hei

ght

(inch

es)

Nod

es A

bove

Whi

te

Flow

er (N

AWF)

0713

-806

-W90

35.

05.

328

.86.

007

13-8

09-W

904

4.8

5.3

31.1

5.9

15R5

56B2

XF4.

44.

528

.75.

816

R225

NRB

2XF

4.2

4.8

27.0

5.9

16R2

28N

RB2X

F4.

24.

029

.66.

216

R229

B2XF

4.1

3.8

29.7

6.6

16R2

32B2

XF4.

74.

530

.65.

916

R242

NRB

2XF

4.5

5.0

29.9

5.8

16R2

51N

RB2X

F3.

63.

328

.96.

716

R252

NRB

2XF

3.7

4.3

30.8

5.8

AMX1

601B

2XF

4.6

4.0

28.2

5.8

BX17

33GL

T4.

95.

330

.75.

8BX

1737

GLT

4.9

5.3

28.1

6.1

BX17

39GL

T4.

65.

329

.36.

5BX

1774

GLTP

4.5

5.0

28.2

5.9

BX17

75GL

TP5.

25.

527

.76.

0BX

1776

GLTP

5.1

6.3

27.1

6.7

DP10

44B2

RF4.

14.

029

.06.

0DP

1549

B2XF

4.6

5.3

29.6

6.3

DP17

25B2

XF4.

34.

327

.65.

8DP

1747

NRB

2XF

4.0

4.0

29.7

6.1

FM18

30GL

T4.

64.

028

.16.

0FM

1953

GLTP

3.6

4.0

27.9

5.6

NG3

406B

2XF

4.8

5.8

29.8

5.4

NG3

500X

F4.

45.

031

.06.

4N

G351

7B2X

F4.

64.

330

.05.

9N

G454

5B2X

F4.

55.

032

.56.

2N

G500

7B2X

F4.

13.

830

.45.

6PC

G604

5.1

6.3

31.1

6.3

PCG6

054.

54.

830

.66.

2PC

G612

4.9

6.3

29.6

6.0

PCG6

155.

16.

328

.36.

0ST

4949

GLT

3.7

4.3

28.5

6.5

ST50

20GL

T4.

65.

529

.15.

4M

ean

4.5

4.8

29.3

6.0


Cotto

n Va

riety

Testi

ng R

esult

s20

16Ea

rly a

nd m

id-s

easo

n da

ta c

olle

cted

for t

he U

nive

rsity

of A

rizon

a U

plan

d C

otto

n Ad

vanc

ed S

train

Tes

ting

Prog

ram

, Saf

ford

, AZ

2016

.

See

d C

ompa

nyVa

riety

Lint

Yie

ld

(lbs/

acre

)P

erce

nt

Loss

Adj

uste

d Li

nt

Yiel

d (lb

s/ac

re)

Yiel

d M

eans

S

epar

atio

n*P

erce

nt L

int

Col

or

Gra

deS

tapl

e (3

2nds

)M

icro

naire

Stre

ngth

(g

/tex)

Leng

th

(in.)

Leaf

G

rade

Uni

form

ity

Inde

x (%

)P

rem

ium

(c

ents

/lb)

Valu

e**

($/

acre

)M

onsa

nto/

Del

tapi

neD

P10

44B

2RF

740.

666

.02,

177.

5a

40.2

3138

4.4

32.2

1.17

381

.24.

4$1

,228

.95

Bay

erB

X17

34G

LT88

4.8

58.5

2,12

6.0

ab42

.231

384.

934

.41.

183

82.4

3.5

$1,1

80.3

5B

ayer

FM18

88G

L10

61.2

49.8

2,10

8.2

abc

43.4

3139

4.9

34.3

1.21

383

.33.

6$1

,173

.04

Mon

sant

o/D

elta

pine

DP

1549

B2X

F91

2.6

56.6

2,09

7.9

abcd

43.4

3137

4.3

31.9

1.17

381

.24.

4$1

,183

.11

Bay

erB

X17

74G

LTP

797.

561

.72,

083.

5ab

cde

39.5

3138

4.2

31.3

1.19

381

.14.

4$1

,175

.84

Mon

sant

o/D

elta

pine

16R

251N

RB

2XF

883.

557

.22,

063.

6ab

cdef

44.6

3139

4.5

31.8

1.21

381

.44.

3$1

,161

.53

Mon

sant

o/D

elta

pine

16R

242N

RB

2XF

850.

758

.72,

056.

8ab

cdef

41.7

3139

4.9

36.1

1.22

382

.63.

4$1

,140

.40

Pre

miu

m C

otto

n G

enet

ics

0713

-809

-W90

470

8.4

65.0

2,02

2.6

bcde

fg40

.431

375.

031

.61.

143

81.2

2.3

$1,0

97.7

6M

onsa

nto/

Del

tapi

neD

P17

47N

RB

2XF

708.

464

.51,

994.

1cd

efgh

45.0

3137

4.4

30.9

1.16

381

.04.

1$1

,118

.60

Mon

sant

o/D

elta

pine

DP

1725

B2X

F44

2.8

77.7

1,98

5.1

cdef

gh45

.231

374.

829

.61.

153

80.8

3.3

$1,0

97.2

7B

ayer

BX

1735

GLT

1086

.345

.01,

971.

0de

fgh

39.6

3140

4.0

34.4

1.26

382

.24.

7$1

,116

.89

Mon

sant

o/D

elta

pine

15R

556B

2XF

862.

256

.21,

968.

6de

fghi

47.0

3139

4.0

32.5

1.21

380

.54.

1$1

,104

.53

Pre

miu

m C

otto

n G

enet

ics

PC

G61

564

6.8

67.1

1,96

3.1

efgh

ij38

.631

394.

733

.41.

213

81.8

4.5

$1,1

08.6

5B

ayer

/Sto

nevi

lleS

T494

6GLB

254

5.9

72.2

1,96

2.4

efgh

ij41

.331

384.

533

.01.

183

81.6

4.3

$1,1

04.8

9P

rem

ium

Cot

ton

Gen

etic

s07

08-8

06-W

903

543.

572

.51,

958.

1ef

ghij

40.8

3139

4.6

35.0

1.21

382

.64.

5$1

,106

.95

Bay

er/F

iber

Max

FM18

30G

LT79

6.8

59.3

1,94

6.3

fghi

j43

.331

394.

632

.91.

233

81.6

4.4

$1,0

97.5

8B

ayer

BX

1733

GLT

642.

866

.51,

915.

1gh

ij42

.231

384.

533

.11.

183

81.4

4.4

$1,0

80.1

2B

ayer

/Sto

nevi

lleS

T494

9GLT

627.

767

.11,

906.

8gh

ij43

.931

374.

630

.21.

163

80.3

3.7

$1,0

61.6

9M

onsa

nto/

Del

tapi

ne16

R25

2NR

B2X

F74

9.1

60.3

1,88

1.9

hijk

44.4

3137

4.6

31.0

1.16

380

.23.

8$1

,050

.13

Bay

er/F

iber

Max

FM19

11G

LT10

27.2

44.4

1,83

9.6

ijkl

41.1

3138

4.8

33.3

1.20

381

.84.

3$1

,035

.94

Bay

erFM

1953

GLT

P73

2.7

60.3

1,83

7.0

jklm

40.4

3139

4.3

32.7

1.22

382

.14.

6$1

,039

.38

Pre

miu

m C

otto

n G

enet

ics

PC

G61

152

9.5

70.2

1,76

4.5

klm

39.7

3138

4.7

32.7

1.18

381

.64.

2$9

92.1

6A

mer

icot

/Nex

Gen

NG

3517

B2X

F59

2.5

66.1

1,74

5.6

lmn

39.1

3139

4.5

32.8

1.20

382

.64.

7$9

89.7

6A

mer

icot

/Nex

Gen

NG

3500

XF

607.

665

.41,

737.

3lm

n41

.131

374.

933

.11.

153

82.5

3.3

$961

.74

Am

eric

ot/N

exG

enN

G45

45B

2XF

610.

364

.81,

730.

1lm

n40

.731

374.

832

.31.

163

80.5

3.9

$966

.76

Am

eric

ot/N

exG

enN

G34

06B

2XF

381.

377

.71,

708.

0m

n42

.331

374.

431

.21.

163

82.0

4.3

$961

.17

Mon

sant

o/D

elta

pine

16R

232B

2XF

535.

168

.61,

693.

5n

38.0

3139

4.4

35.4

1.21

382

.74.

7$9

59.6

5A

mer

icot

/Nex

Gen

AM

X16

01B

2XF

434.

974

.41,

687.

3n

44.3

3139

4.9

34.1

1.20

381

.43.

9$9

43.7

4M

onsa

nto/

Del

tapi

ne16

R22

8NR

B2X

F46

8.7

72.3

1,68

6.5

n43

.331

383.

832

.31.

193

80.6

3.8

$941

.41

Mon

sant

o/D

elta

pine

16R

225N

RB

2XF

467.

070

.01,

553.

0o

43.9

3139

3.8

32.8

1.22

381

.34.

4$8

76.1

4B

ayer

BX

1736

GLT

1006

.035

.21,

551.

8o

42.7

3139

4.1

33.6

1.23

382

.04.

6$8

78.0

9P

rem

ium

Cot

ton

Gen

etic

sP

CG

612

606.

560

.51,

531.

2o

39.6

3137

5.0

32.0

1.15

381

.02.

8$8

40.3

1M

onsa

nto/

Del

tapi

ne16

R22

9B2X

F51

9.6

65.9

1,52

5.3

o41

.731

364.

630

.21.

113

81.2

3.7

$850

.51

Am

eric

ot/N

exG

enN

G50

07B

2XF

399.

973

.71,

508.

2o

43.2

3137

4.5

28.6

1.15

380

.73.

6$8

38.8

5P

rem

ium

Cot

ton

Gen

etic

sP

CG

616

543.

563

.61,

491.

6o

38.1

3138

4.6

31.2

1.17

379

.23.

3$8

24.6

1Av

erag

e68

7.5

63.2

1853

.541

.9--

-38

4.5

32.5

1.19

---

81.5

4.0

$1,0

38.5

0LS

D§

114.

73.

913

0.0

1.7

---

10.

31.

50.

03--

-N

S1.

0$7

9.91

OS

L†<0

.000

1<0

.000

1<0

.000

1<0

.000

1--

-<0

.000

1<0

.000

1<0

.000

1<0

.000

1--

-0.

053

0.00

0<0

.000

1C

V‡

12.0

4.5

5.0

3.0

---

2.1

4.7

3.3

1.8

---

1.5

18.2

5.5

*Mea

ns fo

llow

ed b

y th

e sa

me

lette

r are

not

sig

nific

antly

diff

eren

t by

Fish

er’s

Pro

tect

ed L

SD

at α

= 0

.05.

**

Valu

e ca

lcul

ated

from

CC

C lo

an s

ched

ule

base

pric

e of

$0.

52/lb

+ p

rem

ium

/dis

coun

t§

Leas

t Sig

nific

ant D

iffer

ence

† O

bser

ved

Sig

nific

ance

Lev

el‡

Coe

ffici

ent o

f Var

iatio

n


Cotto

n Va

riety

Testi

ng R

esult

s20

16Ea

rly a

nd m

id-s

easo

n da

ta c

olle

cted

for t

he U

nive

rsity

of A

rizon

a U

plan

d C

otto

n Ad

vanc

ed S

train

Tes

ting

Prog

ram

, Saf

ford

, AZ

2016

.

Varie

tyP

lant

Pop

ula-

tion

(pla

nts/

foot

)

Pla

nt V

igor

R

atin

g (0

-9

L-H

)

Pla

nt

Hei

ght

(inch

es)

Nod

es A

bove

Whi

te

Flow

er (N

AWF)

0708

-806

-W90

34.

46.

332

.05.

407

13-8

09-W

904

3.6

6.0

31.3

5.8

15R

556B

2XF

2.0

3.3

31.8

7.3

16R

225N

RB

2XF

1.9

3.3

30.7

6.4

16R

228N

RB

2XF

1.9

3.7

31.0

5.4

16R

229B

2XF

2.6

4.5

33.8

6.2

16R

232B

2XF

3.7

5.7

34.1

5.7

16R

242N

RB

2XF

4.3

6.3

30.7

5.4

16R

251N

RB

2XF

2.3

4.0

31.8

6.9

16R

252N

RB

2XF

3.7

6.0

30.5

6.8

AM

X16

01B

2XF

2.3

4.3

30.7

5.4

BX

1733

GLT

3.9

5.7

31.8

6.4

BX

1734

GLT

4.0

5.7

33.1

5.5

BX

1735

GLT

3.9

6.3

30.5

5.7

BX

1736

GLT

3.3

5.7

30.6

5.4

BX

1774

GLT

P3.

85.

329

.25.

3D

P10

44B

2RF

3.4

5.0

31.0

6.3

DP

1549

B2X

F3.

65.

330

.66.

0D

P17

25B

2XF

2.7

4.3

28.0

5.4

DP

1747

NR

B2X

F3.

35.

330

.66.

1FM

1830

GLT

3.6

5.3

30.7

6.2

FM18

88G

L3.

16.

030

.55.

5FM

1911

GLT

3.8

5.8

30.0

6.2

FM19

53G

LTP

4.2

6.0

30.1

6.0

NG

3406

B2X

F3.

87.

033

.06.

1N

G35

00X

F3.

96.

032

.66.

0N

G35

17B

2XF

3.8

6.0

31.7

5.9

NG

4545

B2X

F4.

56.

730

.45.

9N

G50

07B

2XF

2.3

4.5

29.5

5.3

PC

G61

14.

16.

729

.55.

8P

CG

612

4.3

6.3

32.4

6.3

PC

G61

53.

46.

331

.25.

3P

CG

616

3.8

6.7

31.8

6.1

ST4

946G

LB2

3.2

5.3

31.7

5.7

ST4

949G

LT3.

05.

030

.65.

9M

ean

3.5

5.5

31.1

5.9


Cotto

n Va

riety

Testi

ng R

esult

s20

16Yi

eld

and

fiber

qua

lity

data

for t

he U

nive

rsity

of A

rizon

a U

plan

d C

otto

n Va

riety

Tes

ting

Prog

ram

, Yum

a, A

Z 20

16.

See

d C

ompa

nyVa

riety

Lint

Yie

ld

(lbs/

acre

)Yi

eld

Mea

ns

Sep

arat

ion*

Per

cent

Li

ntC

olor

G

rade

Sta

ple

(32n

ds)

Mic

ro-

naire

Stre

ngth

(g

/tex)

Leng

th

(in.)

Leaf

G

rade

Uni

form

ity

Inde

x (%

)P

rem

ium

(c

ents

/lb)

Valu

e *

($/a

cre)

Mon

sant

o/D

elta

pine

DP

1522

B2X

F2,

039.

1a

36.5

3137

5.2

33.6

1.15

482

.50.

9$1

,077

.70

Bay

er/S

tone

ville

ST4

946G

LB2

1,89

0.5

b36

.721

375.

133

.21.

143

81.3

1.8

$1,0

17.3

5M

onsa

nto/

Del

tapi

neD

P16

12B

2XF

1,80

9.8

bc34

.431

374.

933

.31.

194

80.7

1.8

$973

.49

Dow

/Phy

toge

nP

HY

333W

RF

1,79

1.7

bcd

35.4

3138

4.5

33.9

1.21

480

.02.

1$9

68.9

2D

ow/P

hyto

gen

PH

Y31

2WR

F1,

731.

3cd

e34

.631

374.

732

.91.

183

81.6

4.0

$969

.10

CP

S/D

ynag

Gro

DG

3385

B2X

F1,

687.

8de

34.1

2137

5.0

31.0

1.14

282

.53.

9$9

41.8

3B

ayer

/Sto

nevi

lleS

T494

9GLT

1,64

6.4

ef36

.131

375.

133

.31.

174

81.6

1.5

$880

.18

CP

S/D

ynag

Gro

DG

3757

B2X

F1,

541.

8f

37.8

2137

5.2

31.1

1.16

281

.81.

7$8

27.9

4Av

erag

e1,

767.

335

.7--

-37

5.0

32.8

1.17

381

.52.

2$9

57.0

6LS

D§

115.

21.

5--

-N

S0.

3N

S0.

041

NS

NS

$62.

09O

SL†

<0.0

001

0.00

1--

-0.

678

0.00

10.

123

0.04

00.

007

0.17

30.

063

<0.0

001

CV

‡3.

72.

4--

-2.

63.

24.

22.

119

.51.

455

.43.

7*

Valu

e ca

lcul

ated

from

CC

C lo

an s

ched

ule

base

pric

e of

$0.

52/lb

+ p

rem

ium

/dis

coun

t§

Leas

t Sig

nific

ant D

iffer

ence

† O

bser

ved

Sig

nific

ance

Lev

el‡

Coe

ffici

ent o

f Var

iatio

n


Cotto

n Va

riety

Testi

ng R

esult

s20

16Ea

rly a

nd m

id-s

easo

n da

ta c

olle

cted

for t

he U

nive

rsity

of A

rizon

a U

plan

d C

otto

n Va

riety

Tes

ting

Prog

ram

, Yum

a, A

Z 20

16.

Varie

tyPl

ant P

opul

ation

(p

lant

s/fo

ot)

Plan

t Vig

or R

ating

(0

-9 L

-H)

Plan

t Hei

ght

(inch

es)

Nod

ea A

bove

Whi

te F

low

er

(NAW

F)DG

3385

B2XF

2.4

6.7

7.0

DG37

57B2

XF2.

16.

37.

7DP

1522

B2XF

2.3

7.0

8.1

DP16

12B2

XF2.

47.

76.

9PH

Y312

WRF

2.2

6.3

7.4

PHY3

33W

RF2.

06.

07.

2ST

4946

GLB2

2.2

5.7

6.9

ST49

49GL

T1.

64.

77.

1M

ean

2.2

6.3

7.3

Figu

re p

rese

ntin

g lin

t yie

ld (y

-axi

s) v

ersu

s fib

er q

ualit

y pr

emiu

m/

disc

ount

(x-a

xis)

for t

he U

CVT

loca

tion

in Y

uma,

AZ,

201

6.


Cotto

n Va

riety

Testi

ng R

esult

s20

16Yi

eld

and

fiber

qua

lity

data

for t

he U

nive

rsity

of A

rizon

a U

plan

d C

otto

n Va

riety

Tes

ting

Prog

ram

, Goo

dyea

r, AZ

201

6.

See

d C

ompa

nyVa

riety

Lint

Yie

ld

(lbs/

acre

)Yi

eld

Mea

ns

Sep

ara-

tion*

Per

cent

Li

ntC

olor

G

rade

Sta

ple

(32n

ds)

Mic

ro-

naire

Stre

ngth

(g

/tex)

Leng

th

(in.)

Leaf

G

rade

Uni

form

i-ty

Inde

x (%

)

Pre

miu

m

(cen

ts/lb

)Va

lue

* ($

/ac

re)

Mon

sant

o/D

elta

pine

DP

1555

B2R

F2,

147.

7a

40.1

3140

4.0

35.1

1.25

383

.25.

1$1

,226

.34

Mon

sant

o/D

elta

pine

DP

1549

B2X

F2,

111.

4ab

38.8

3139

3.8

33.6

1.20

382

.05.

4$1

,212

.02

Dow

/Phy

toge

nP

HY

444W

RF

2,11

0.7

ab37

.631

423.

934

.71.

303

83.9

5.0

$1,2

02.0

4D

ow/P

hyto

gen

PH

Y33

3WR

F2,

090.

2ab

37.5

4139

4.3

33.0

1.22

683

.4$1

,067

.36

Bay

er/S

tone

ville

ST4

946G

LB2

2,08

8.0

ab36

.031

384.

734

.61.

184

83.6

2.5

$1,1

37.4

9C

PS

/Dyn

agG

roD

G33

85B

2XF

1,97

2.1

ab35

.831

394.

832

.71.

203

84.3

4.8

$1,1

20.1

2B

ayer

/Sto

nevi

lleS

T494

9GLT

1,94

8.5

b37

.741

384.

232

.81.

205

83.4

0.4

$1,0

20.0

3C

PS

/Dyn

agG

roD

G37

57B

2XF

1,69

1.3

c37

.531

384.

232

.11.

203

83.5

5.3

$968

.70

Dow

/Phy

toge

nP

HY

725R

F1,

485.

1d

32.3

4140

3.6

38.5

1.26

584

.60.

5$7

79.3

7Av

erag

e1,

960.

637

.0--

-39

4.2

34.1

1.22

483

.53.

1$1

,081

.50

LSD

§18

2.1

1.5

---

10.

31.

40.

031

1.3

2.8

$129

.24

OS

L†0.

000

<0.0

001

---

0.00

00.

000

0.00

00.

000

0.00

50.

048

0.00

30.

001

CV

‡4.

11.

8--

-1.

13.

51.

81.

216

.50.

739

.25.

2*

Valu

e ca

lcul

ated

from

CC

C lo

an s

ched

ule

base

pric

e of

$0.

52/lb

+ p

rem

ium

/dis

coun

t§

Leas

t Sig

nific

ant D

iffer

ence

† O

bser

ved

Sig

nific

ance

Lev

el‡

Coe

ffici

ent o

f Var

iatio

n


Cotto

n Va

riety

Testi

ng R

esult

s20

16Ea

rly a

nd m

id-s

easo

n da

ta c

olle

cted

for t

he U

nive

rsity

of A

rizon

a U

plan

d C

otto

n Va

riety

Tes

ting

Prog

ram

, Goo

dyea

r, AZ

201

6.

Varie

tyP

lant

Pop

ulat

ion

(pla

nts/

foot

)P

lant

Vig

or R

atin

g (0

-9 L

-H)

Pla

nt H

eigh

t (in

ches

)N

odes

Abo

ve W

hite

Fl

ower

(NAW

F)D

G33

85B

2XF

35.2

6.0

DG

3757

B2X

F34

.27.

5D

P15

49B

2XF

39.2

7.4

DP

1555

B2R

F35

.67.

5P

HY

333W

RF

39.1

5.5

PH

Y44

4WR

F36

.16.

0P

HY

725R

F35

.85.

7S

T494

6GLB

234

.65.

7S

T494

9GLT

35.8

6.9

Mea

n36

.26.

5

Figu

re p

rese

ntin

g lin

t yie

ld (y

-axi

s) v

ersu

s fib

er q

ualit

y pr

emiu

m/

disc

ount

(x-a

xis)

for t

he U

CVT

loca

tion

in G

oody

ear,

AZ, 2

016.


Cotto

n Va

riety

Testi

ng R

esult

s20

16Yi

eld

and

fiber

qua

lity

data

for t

he U

nive

rsity

of A

rizon

a U

plan

d C

otto

n Va

riety

Tes

ting

Prog

ram

, Que

en C

reek

, AZ

2016

.

See

d C

ompa

nyVa

riety

Lint

Yie

ld

(lbs/

acre

)Yi

eld

Mea

ns

Sep

arat

ion*

Per

cent

Li

ntC

olor

G

rade

Sta

ple

(32n

ds)

Mic

rona

ireS

treng

th

(g/te

x)Le

ngth

(in

.)Le

af

Gra

deU

nifo

rmity

In

dex

(%)

Pre

miu

m

(cen

ts/lb

)Va

lue

* ($

/ac

re)

Mon

sant

o/D

elta

pine

DP

1044

B2R

F1,

894.

0a

36.1

4137

4.8

31.5

1.15

382

.52.

9$1

,040

.03

Bay

er/F

iber

Max

FM18

30G

LT1,

857.

8ab

37.2

3139

4.8

34.2

1.22

282

.65.

4$1

,065

.68

Dow

/Phy

toge

nP

HY

444W

RF

1,79

9.9

abc

37.9

3139

4.0

33.8

1.23

282

.55.

3$1

,031

.63

CP

S/D

ynag

Gro

DG

3757

B2X

F1,

761.

4bc

37.8

3137

4.8

31.2

1.17

283

.05.

2$1

,008

.17

Mon

sant

o/D

elta

pine

DP

1549

B2X

F1,

702.

1cd

36.6

3137

4.5

32.1

1.15

281

.14.

7$9

65.1

1B

ayer

/Sto

nevi

lleS

T494

9GLT

1,69

3.8

cd36

.831

374.

732

.11.

163

82.5

4.0

$948

.96

Dow

/Phy

toge

nP

HY

333W

RF

1,58

0.3

d35

.341

384.

232

.31.

193

82.2

3.6

$878

.07

CP

S/D

ynag

Gro

DG

3445

B2X

F1,

393.

9e

33.6

3139

4.6

35.8

1.23

283

.85.

1$7

96.3

6Av

erag

e1,

710.

436

.4--

-38

4.6

32.9

1.19

282

.54.

5$9

66.7

5LS

D§

128.

02.

6--

-1

0.3

1.5

0.04

10.

90.

8$6

8.08

OS

L†<0

.000

10.

044

---

0.00

80.

000

0.00

00.

001

0.00

30.

002

<0.0

001

<0.0

001

CV

‡4.

34.

0--

-2.

13.

72.

71.

917

.50.

610

.44.

0*

Valu

e ca

lcul

ated

from

CC

C lo

an s

ched

ule

base

pric

e of

$0.

52/lb

+ p

rem

ium

/dis

coun

t§

Leas

t Sig

nific

ant D

iffer

ence

† O

bser

ved

Sig

nific

ance

Lev

el‡

Coe

ffici

ent o

f Var

iatio

n


Cotto

n Va

riety

Testi

ng R

esult

s20

16Ea

rly a

nd m

id-s

easo

n da

ta c

olle

cted

for t

he U

nive

rsity

of A

rizon

a U

plan

d C

otto

n Va

riety

Tes

ting

Prog

ram

, Que

en C

reek

, AZ

2016

.

Figu

re p

rese

ntin

g lin

t yie

ld (y

-axi

s) v

ersu

s fib

er q

ualit

y pr

emiu

m/

disc

ount

(x-a

xis)

for t

he U

CVT

loca

tion

in Q

ueen

Cre

ek, A

Z, 2

016.

Varie

tyP

lant

Pop

ula-

tion

(pla

nts/

foot

)

Pla

nt V

igor

Rat

-in

g (0

-9 L

-H)

Pla

nt H

eigh

t (in

ches

)N

odes

Abo

ve W

hite

Fl

ower

(NAW

F)

DG

3445

B2X

F1.

46.

025

.15.

7D

G37

57B

2XF

2.2

7.3

28.8

7.0

DP

1044

B2R

F3.

17.

526

.07.

0D

P15

49B

2XF

2.6

7.8

24.6

6.2

FM18

30G

LT2.

27.

023

.46.

2P

HY

333W

RF

2.0

7.3

28.0

6.2

PH

Y44

4WR

F1.

76.

525

.56.

2S

T494

9GLT

1.7

6.0

26.1

6.6

Mea

n2.

16.

925

.96.

4


Cotto

n Va

riety

Testi

ng R

esult

s20

16Yi

eld

and

fiber

qua

lity

data

for t

he U

nive

rsity

of A

rizon

a U

plan

d C

otto

n Va

riety

Tes

ting

Prog

ram

, Elo

y, A

Z 20

16.

See

d C

ompa

nyVa

riety

Lint

Yie

ld

(lbs/

acre

)Yi

eld

Mea

ns

Sep

arat

ion*

Per

cent

Li

ntC

olor

G

rade

Sta

ple

(32n

ds)

Mic

ro-

naire

Stre

ngth

(g

/tex)

Leng

th

(in.)

Leaf

G

rade

Uni

form

ity

Inde

x (%

)P

rem

ium

(c

ents

/lb)

Valu

e *

($/a

cre)

Dow

/Phy

toge

nP

HY

333W

RF

1,72

2.0

a40

.531

384.

330

.61.

183

79.9

3.7

$958

.85

Bay

er/S

tone

ville

ST4

949G

LT1,

599.

7b

41.5

3138

3.9

30.8

1.18

380

.13.

9$8

94.2

9B

ayer

/Sto

nevi

lleS

T494

6GLB

21,

586.

1bc

39.9

3138

4.2

32.2

1.19

380

.74.

0$8

87.4

7D

ow/P

hyto

gen

PH

Y44

4WR

F1,

560.

8bc

40.4

3141

3.5

33.2

1.27

379

.62.

7$8

53.3

7M

onsa

nto/

Del

tapi

neD

P10

44B

2RF

1,49

2.4

bc38

.231

364.

230

.51.

123

80.3

3.1

$822

.29

Mon

sant

o/D

elta

pine

DP

1549

B2X

F1,

483.

5c

40.6

3137

3.5

31.7

1.16

379

.41.

9$7

99.8

5C

PS

/Dyn

aGro

DG

3445

B2X

F1,

360.

4d

37.4

3139

3.8

33.9

1.22

380

.54.

2$7

64.4

2C

PS

/Dyn

aGro

DG

3757

B2X

F1,

302.

4d

41.1

3136

4.1

30.3

1.14

380

.33.

4$7

21.6

8Av

erag

e1,

513.

439

.9--

-38

3.9

31.6

1.18

380

.13.

3$8

37.7

8LS

D§

113.

91.

7--

-2

NS

1.5

0.04

---

1.0

1.30

$72.

73O

SL†

<0.0

001

0.00

2--

-0.

000

0.07

80.

001

<0.0

001

---

0.22

40.

040

0.00

0C

V‡

4.3

2.4

---

2.3

8.6

2.8

2.0

---

0.7

23.0

5.0

* Va

lue

calc

ulat

ed fr

om C

CC

loan

sch

edul

e ba

se p

rice

of $

0.52

/lb +

pre

miu

m/d

isco

unt

§ Le

ast S

igni

fican

t Diff

eren

ce†

Obs

erve

d S

igni

fican

ce L

evel

‡ C

oeffi

cien

t of V

aria

tion


Cotto

n Va

riety

Testi

ng R

esult

s20

16Ea

rly a

nd m

id-s

easo

n da

ta c

olle

cted

for t

he U

nive

rsity

of A

rizon

a U

plan

d C

otto

n Va

riety

Tes

ting

Prog

ram

, Elo

y, A

Z 20

16.

Varie

tyP

lant

Pop

ulat

ion

(pla

nts/

foot

)P

lant

Vig

or R

atin

g (0

-9 L

-H)

Pla

nt H

eigh

t (in

ches

)N

odes

Abo

ve W

hite

Fl

ower

(NAW

F)D

G34

45B

2XF

3.2

7.0

32.2

5.7

DG

3757

B2X

F3.

26.

332

.55.

0D

P10

44B

2RF

3.8

6.7

29.1

5.3

DP

1549

B2X

F3.

57.

033

.05.

5P

HY

333W

RF

3.6

7.7

33.5

5.3

PH

Y44

4WR

F3.

77.

031

.85.

3S

T494

6GLB

22.

97.

032

.95.

0S

T494

9GLT

3.1

6.7

31.6

5.8

Mea

n3.

46.

932

.15.

4

Figu

re p

rese

ntin

g lin

t yie

ld (y

-axi

s) v

ersu

s fib

er q

ualit

y pr

emiu

m/

disc

ount

(x-a

xis)

for t

he U

CVT

loca

tion

in E

loy,

AZ,

201

6.


Cotto

n Va

riety

Testi

ng R

esult

s20

16Yi

eld

and

fiber

qua

lity

data

for t

he U

nive

rsity

of A

rizon

a U

plan

d C

otto

n Va

riety

Tes

ting

Prog

ram

, Red

Roc

k, A

Z 20

16.

See

d C

ompa

nyVa

riety

Lint

Yie

ld

(lbs/

acre

)Yi

eld

Mea

ns

Sep

arat

ion*

Per

cent

Li

ntC

olor

G

rade

Sta

ple

(32n

ds)

Mic

rona

ireS

treng

th

(g/te

x)Le

ngth

(in

.)Le

af

Gra

deU

nifo

rmity

In

dex

(%)

Pre

miu

m

(cen

ts/lb

)Va

lue

* ($

/ac

re)

Bay

er/S

tone

ville

ST4

949G

LT2,

171.

6a

38.5

2138

4.6

31.4

1.19

382

.05.

1$1

,241

.15

Mon

sant

o/D

elta

pine

DP

1044

B2R

F2,

019.

8a

36.4

2138

4.8

32.7

1.20

383

.65.

2$1

,155

.96

Mon

sant

o/D

elta

pine

DP

1549

B2X

F2,

011.

2a

37.4

2138

4.4

33.3

1.19

282

.35.

6$1

,158

.73

Dow

/Phy

toge

nP

HY

312W

RF

1,98

1.1

a35

.731

404.

633

.11.

243

84.0

4.9

$1,1

28.1

3C

PS

/Dyn

agG

roD

G37

57B

2XF

1,90

8.2

a40

.921

384.

730

.41.

192

82.4

5.6

$1,0

99.4

5D

ow/P

hyto

gen

PH

Y44

4WR

F1,

885.

9a

38.6

2139

4.3

32.8

1.23

282

.15.

8$1

,090

.34

CP

S/D

ynag

Gro

DG

3385

B2X

F1,

869.

8a

38.1

2138

4.9

31.4

1.19

283

.55.

8$1

,081

.35

Bay

er/S

tone

ville

ST4

946G

LB2

1,85

4.4

a36

.131

384.

833

.11.

202

83.3

5.2

$1,0

61.8

0Av

erag

e1,

962.

737

.7--

-38

4.7

32.3

1.20

282

.95.

4$1

,127

.11

LSD

§N

S1.

6--

-N

S0.

21.

6N

S1

1.2

0.60

NS

OS

L†0.

628

0.00

0--

-0.

096

0.00

20.

011

0.06

20.

013

0.01

30.

028

0.71

3C

V‡

10.7

2.3

---

2.0

2.8

2.8

1.8

19.1

0.8

6.0

11.0

* Va

lue

calc

ulat

ed fr

om C

CC

loan

sch

edul

e ba

se p

rice

of $

0.52

/lb +

pre

miu

m/d

isco

unt

§ Le

ast S

igni

fican

t Diff

eren

ce†

Obs

erve

d S

igni

fican

ce L

evel

‡ C

oeffi

cien

t of V

aria

tion


Cotto

n Va

riety

Testi

ng R

esult

s20

16Ea

rly a

nd m

id-s

easo

n da

ta c

olle

cted

for t

he U

nive

rsity

of A

rizon

a U

plan

d C

otto

n Va

riety

Tes

ting

Prog

ram

, Red

Roc

k, A

Z 20

16.

Varie

tyPl

ant P

opul

ation

(p

lant

s/fo

ot)

Plan

t Vig

or R

ating

(0

-9 L

-H)

Plan

t Hei

ght

(inch

es)

Nod

es A

bove

Whi

te

Flow

er (N

AWF)

DG33

85B2

XF2.

27.

035

.26.

3DG

3757

B2XF

3.0

5.7

39.8

6.1

DP10

44B2

RF2.

96.

036

.96.

7DP

1549

B2XF

2.8

6.3

36.9

7.2

PHY3

12W

RF2.

26.

039

.26.

9PH

Y444

WRF

2.1

5.7

39.6

6.5

ST49

46GL

B22.

76.

336

.96.

8ST

4949

GLT

1.8

5.0

36.5

6.9

Mea

n2.

56.

037

.66.

7

Figu

re p

rese

ntin

g lin

t yie

ld (y

-axi

s) v

ersu

s fib

er q

ualit

y pr

emiu

m/

disc

ount

(x-a

xis)

for t

he U

CVT

loca

tion

in R

ed R

ock,

AZ,

201

6.


Cotto

n Va

riety

Testi

ng R

esult

s20

16Yi

eld

and

fiber

qua

lity

data

for t

he U

nive

rsity

of A

rizon

a U

plan

d C

otto

n Va

riety

Tes

ting

Prog

ram

, Mar

ana,

AZ

2016

.

Seed

Com

pany

Varie

tyLi

nt Y

ield

(lb

s/ac

re)

Yiel

d M

eans

Se

para

tion*

Perc

ent L

int

Colo

r Gra

deSt

aple

(3

2nds

)M

icro

naire

Stre

ngth

(g/

tex)

Leng

th (i

n.)

Leaf

Gra

deU

nifo

rmity

In

dex

(%)

Prem

ium

(c

ents

/lb)

Valu

e *

($/

acre

)Do

w/P

hyto

gen

PHY4

44W

RF97

9.2

a38

.321

394.

232

.01.

232

80.5

5.3

$560

.57

Baye

r/St

onev

ille

ST49

46G

LB2

968.

9a

35.7

2136

4.8

30.5

1.11

281

.93.

1$5

33.5

8CP

S/Dy

nagG

roDG

3385

B2XF

930.

7ab

37.4

3136

4.9

30.0

1.13

282

.04.

0$5

21.7

2M

onsa

nto/

Delta

pine

DP15

49B2

XF92

9.3

ab36

.921

354.

630

.11.

092

80.6

2.8

$509

.21

Baye

r/St

onev

ille

ST49

49G

LT90

3.7

ab37

.231

364.

830

.61.

143

81.5

3.0

$497

.05

CPS/

Dyna

gGro

DG34

06B2

XF85

5.5

ab37

.421

364.

730

.21.

113

80.7

3.6

$475

.78

Dow

/Phy

toge

nPH

Y312

WRF

838.

1b

34.4

3137

4.7

30.4

1.15

381

.03.

9$4

68.0

2M

onsa

nto/

Delta

pine

DP16

39B2

XF81

4.3

b37

.031

365.

131

.51.

113

81.5

1.3

$433

.82

CPS/

Dyna

gGro

DG37

57B2

XF80

8.2

b38

.921

354.

929

.61.

102

81.5

2.9

$443

.97

Aver

age

892.

037

.0---

364.

730

.51.

132

81.2

3.3

$493

.75

LSD§

NS

2.8

---3

2.8

NS

2.84

NS

NS

NS

NS

OSL

†0.

062

0.00

2---

0.00

3<0

.000

10.

100

0.00

60.

507

0.73

20.

408

0.05

0CV

‡7.

92.

7---

2.6

2.7

2.9

2.8

27.6

1.4

51.7

9.1

* Va

lue

calc

ulat

ed fr

om C

CC lo

an sc

hedu

le b

ase

pric

e of

$0.

52/lb

+ p

rem

ium

/disc

ount

§ Le

ast S

igni

fican

t Diff

eren

ce†

Obs

erve

d Si

gnifi

canc

e Le

vel

‡ Co

effici

ent o

f Var

iatio

n


Cotto

n Va

riety

Testi

ng R

esult

s20

16Ea

rly a

nd m

id-s

easo

n da

ta c

olle

cted

for t

he U

nive

rsity

of A

rizon

a U

plan

d C

otto

n Va

riety

Tes

ting

Prog

ram

, Mar

ana,

AZ

2016

.

Varie

tyPl

ant P

opul

ation

(p

lant

s/fo

ot)

Plan

t Vig

or R

ating

(0

-9 L

-H)

Plan

t Hei

ght

(inch

es)

Nod

es A

bove

Whi

te

Flow

er (N

AWF)

DG33

85B2

XF2.

67.

230

.65.

1DG

3406

B2XF

2.7

7.2

30.2

5.8

DG37

57B2

XF2.

26.

432

.75.

3DP

1549

B2XF

2.8

7.8

31.0

5.7

DP16

39B2

XF2.

56.

829

.25.

4PH

Y312

WRF

2.5

7.4

32.6

5.2

PHY4

44W

RF2.

47.

029

.85.

0ST

4946

GLB2

2.7

7.0

30.7

5.5

ST49

49GL

T2.

26.

230

.45.

6M

ean

2.5

7.0

30.8

5.4

Figu

re p

rese

ntin

g lin

t yie

ld (y

-axi

s) v

ersu

s fib

er q

ualit

y pr

emiu

m/

disc

ount

(x-a

xis)

for t

he U

CVT

loca

tion

in M

aran

a, A

Z, 2

016.


Cotto

n Va

riety

Testi

ng R

esult

s20

16Yi

eld

and

fiber

qua

lity

data

for t

he U

nive

rsity

of A

rizon

a U

plan

d C

otto

n Va

riety

Tes

ting

Prog

ram

, Tha

tche

r, AZ

201

6.

See

d C

ompa

nyVa

riety

Lint

Yie

ld

(lbs/

acre

)Yi

eld

Mea

ns

Sep

arat

ion*

Per

cent

Li

ntC

olor

G

rade

Sta

ple

(32n

ds)

Mic

ro-

naire

Stre

ngth

(g

/tex)

Leng

th

(in.)

Leaf

G

rade

Uni

form

ity

Inde

x (%

)P

rem

ium

(c

ents

/lb)

Valu

e *

($/a

cre)

Bay

er/F

iber

Max

FM19

11G

LT2,

155.

9a

38.2

2138

4.7

31.7

1.18

380

.94.

5$1

,216

.74

Mon

sant

o/D

elta

pine

DP

1549

B2X

F2,

101.

6a

36.8

2137

3.8

30.6

1.15

279

.54.

9$1

,195

.33

Mon

sant

o/D

elta

pine

DP

1044

B2R

F2,

011.

0a

36.2

2137

3.9

30.0

1.15

380

.13.

6$1

,118

.49

Bay

er/F

iber

Max

FM18

30G

LT1,

981.

1a

39.2

2140

4.4

33.6

1.25

282

.15.

6$1

,141

.35

Dow

/Phy

toge

nP

HY

333W

RF

1,95

2.5

a37

.231

374.

231

.01.

163

80.8

3.6

$1,0

84.8

2C

PS

/Dyn

aGro

DG

3757

B2X

F1,

924.

4a

40.6

2137

4.4

30.0

1.16

379

.84.

0$1

,077

.89

Dow

/Phy

toge

nP

HY

444W

RF

1,88

6.5

a38

.821

403.

332

.41.

243

79.8

2.1

$1,0

21.3

2C

PS

/Dyn

aGro

DG

3385

B2X

F1,

857.

4a

36.6

2137

4.5

29.7

1.16

381

.24.

7$1

,054

.42

Aver

age

1,98

3.8

38.0

---

384.

131

.11.

183

80.5

4.1

$1,1

13.7

9LS

D§

NS

2.2

---

10.

21.

61.

25N

SN

SN

SN

SO

SL†

0.23

50.

009

---

<0.0

001

<0.0

001

0.00

1<0

.000

10.

171

0.45

90.

078

0.17

7C

V‡

7.3

3.3

---

1.6

3.0

2.9

1.7

27.1

1.9

29.3

7.9

* Va

lue

calc

ulat

ed fr

om C

CC

loan

sch

edul

e ba

se p

rice

of $

0.52

/lb +

pre

miu

m/d

isco

unt

§ Le

ast S

igni

fican

t Diff

eren

ce†

Obs

erve

d S

igni

fican

ce L

evel

‡ C

oeffi

cien

t of V

aria

tion


Cotto

n Va

riety

Testi

ng R

esult

s20

16Ea

rly a

nd m

id-s

easo

n da

ta c

olle

cted

for t

he U

nive

rsity

of A

rizon

a U

plan

d C

otto

n Va

riety

Tes

ting

Prog

ram

, Tha

tche

r, AZ

201

6.

Varie

tyP

lant

Pop

u-la

tion

(pla

nts/

foot

)

Pla

nt V

igor

R

atin

g (0

-9

L-H

)

Pla

nt

Hei

ght

(inch

es)

Nod

es A

bove

Whi

te

Flow

er (N

AWF)

DG

3385

B2X

F6.

77.

731

.04.

7D

G37

57B

2XF

5.6

7.0

27.6

4.1

DP

1044

B2R

F6.

17.

731

.34.

8D

P15

49B

2XF

6.1

7.3

31.1

5.0

FM18

30G

LT5.

77.

031

.04.

3FM

1911

GLT

5.2

7.0

28.5

4.5

PH

Y33

3WR

F5.

67.

031

.35.

0P

HY

444W

RF

5.7

7.3

28.7

4.1

Mea

n5.

87.

330

.04.

6

Figu

re p

rese

ntin

g lin

t yie

ld (y

-axi

s) v

ersu

s fib

er q

ualit

y pr

emiu

m/

disc

ount

(x-a

xis)

for t

he U

CVT

loca

tion

in T

hatc

her,

AZ, 2

016.


Cotto

n Va

riety

Testi

ng R

esult

s20

16Yi

eld

and

fiber

qua

lity

data

for t

he U

nive

rsity

of A

rizon

a U

plan

d C

otto

n Va

riety

Tes

ting

Prog

ram

, Willc

ox, A

Z 20

16.

See

d C

ompa

nyVa

riety

Lint

Yie

ld

(lbs/

acre

)Yi

eld

Mea

ns

Sep

arat

ion*

Per

cent

Li

ntC

olor

G

rade

Sta

ple

(32n

ds)

Mic

ro-

naire

Stre

ngth

(g

/tex)

Leng

th

(in.)

Leaf

G

rade

Uni

form

ity

Inde

x (%

)P

rem

ium

(c

ents

/lb)

Valu

e *

($/a

cre)

CP

S/D

ynaG

roD

G33

85B

2XF

2,35

1.6

a38

.821

404.

131

.21.

241

83.9

5.9

$1,3

62.3

9M

onsa

nto/

Del

tapi

neD

P16

12B

2XF

2,30

7.3

a38

.021

404.

032

.61.

252

83.0

5.7

$1,3

29.8

5D

ow/P

hyto

gen

PH

Y31

2WR

F2,

299.

1a

36.2

2140

4.0

31.4

1.25

383

.05.

5$1

,321

.01

Mon

sant

o/D

elta

pine

DP

1522

B2X

F2,

259.

6a

36.8

2139

4.3

31.6

1.22

282

.65.

6$1

,302

.58

Bay

er/F

iber

Max

FM19

11G

LT2,

188.

9ab

38.1

2140

3.9

32.9

1.25

282

.85.

7$1

,263

.72

Dow

/Phy

toge

nP

HY

333W

RF

2,18

2.4

ab36

.821

394.

131

.81.

223

82.3

5.4

$1,2

53.3

3B

ayer

/Fib

erM

axFM

1320

GL

2,15

0.5

ab39

.221

384.

231

.51.

182

81.2

5.5

$1,2

37.1

6C

PS

/Dyn

aGro

DG

3757

B2X

F2,

034.

4ab

38.2

1138

4.0

29.3

1.19

181

.85.

6$1

,170

.77

Aver

age

2,22

1.7

37.8

---

394.

131

.51.

222

82.6

5.6

$1,2

80.1

0LS

D§

NS

1.4

---

1N

S1.

00.

031

1.4

NS

NS

OS

L†0.

080.

005

---

0.01

30.

172

<0.0

001

0.00

40.

029

0.04

60.

798

0.06

9C

V‡

5.2

2.1

---

1.9

4.6

1.7

1.6

24.1

1.0

6.9

5.2

* Va

lue

calc

ulat

ed fr

om C

CC

loan

sch

edul

e ba

se p

rice

of $

0.52

/lb +

pre

miu

m/d

isco

unt

§ Le

ast S

igni

fican

t Diff

eren

ce†

Obs

erve

d S

igni

fican

ce L

evel

‡ C

oeffi

cien

t of V

aria

tion


Cotto

n Va

riety

Testi

ng R

esult

s20

16Ea

rly a

nd m

id-s

easo

n da

ta c

olle

cted

for t

he U

nive

rsity

of A

rizon

a U

plan

d C

otto

n Va

riety

Tes

ting

Prog

ram

, Willc

ox, A

Z 20

16.

Varie

tyP

lant

Pop

ulat

ion

(pla

nts/

foot

)P

lant

Vig

or R

atin

g (0

-9 L

-H)

Pla

nt H

eigh

t (in

ches

)N

odes

Abo

ve W

hite

Fl

ower

(NAW

F)D

G33

85B

2XF

2.4

7D

G37

57B

2XF

2.1

6.3

DP

1522

B2X

F2.

67.

3D

P16

12B

2XF

3.1

7.7

FM13

20G

LT2.

65.

7FM

1911

GLT

2.2

7.3

PH

Y31

2WR

F2.

57.

3P

HY

333W

RF

2.6

7.0

Mea

n2.

57.

0

Figu

re p

rese

ntin

g lin

t yie

ld (y

-axi

s) v

ersu

s fib

er q

ualit

y pr

emiu

m/

disc

ount

(x-a

xis)

for t

he U

CVT

loca

tion

in W

illcox

, AZ,

201

6.



AZ 1736P-171

February 2017

extension.arizona.edu/pubs/az1736-2017.pdf

Any products, services, or organizations that are mentioned, shown, or indirectly implied in this publication do not imply endorsement by The University of Arizona

The University of Arizona is an Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer

Documents

2016 Cotton Variety Testing Results - University of Arizona › sites › extension... · Cotton Variety Testing Results 2016 Introduction Variety selection is one of the most important