28 11th Street Asbestos Report - Greenville County

Asbestos Assessment Report

Residential Structure - 28 11th Street

Greenville, South Carolina

S&ME Project No. 4226-18-003 Phase 47

PREPARED FOR:

Greenville County

301 University Ridge, Suite 4100

Greenville, South Carolina, 29601

PREPARED BY:

S&ME, Inc.

48 Brookfield Oaks Drive, Suite F

Greenville, SC 29607

December 27, 2018

Inspection Performed by:

Taylor Williams

SCDHEC License BI-01602

Inspection Date: November 30, 2018

Asbestos Identified No

Asbestos Design Required No

Asbestos Air Monitoring Required No

Attachment A

S&ME, Inc. | 48 Brookfield Oaks Drive, Suite F | Greenville, SC 29607 | p 864.297.9944 | www.smeinc.com

December 27, 2018

Greenville County

301 University Ridge, Suite 4100

Greenville, South Carolina 29601

Attention: Ms. Jessica Jordan

Reference: Asbestos Assessment Report

Residential Structure – 28 11th Street


S&ME Project No. 4226-18-003, Phase 47

Dear Ms. Jordan:

S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) has completed an asbestos assessment for the referenced property. The purpose of the

assessment is to identify asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) in the structure prior to demolition. Our

assessment was conducted in general accordance with our Proposal Number 42-1600890 dated July 20, 2016.

This work was authorized by the Greenville County Task Order # 04, dated August 1, 2018.

S&ME appreciates the opportunity to provide our asbestos assessment services to Greenville County. Please

contact us at your convenience if there are questions regarding the information contained in this report.

Sincerely,

S&ME, Inc.

Brian Mulholland Sherman Woodson, CIH, CSP

Staff Professional Senior Industrial Hygienist

[email protected] [email protected]

BM/SW T:\Projects\2018\ENV\4226-18-003_Greenville County Asbestos_Various Residents\Working_Documents\Phase 47 - 28 11th Street

ACM\28 11th Street Asbestos Report.docx





December 27, 2018 ii

Table of Contents

1.0 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... 1

2.0 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 2

3.0 Site And Project Descriptions ........................................................................................ 2

3.1 Purpose ............................................................................................................................................ 2

3.2 Site Description ............................................................................................................................... 2

4.0 Asbestos Assessment ........................................................................................................ 3

4.1 Sampling and Analysis .................................................................................................................. 3

4.2 Assessment ...................................................................................................................................... 3

4.3 Findings and Results ...................................................................................................................... 4

5.0 Conclusions and Recommendations ............................................................................. 5

6.0 Assumptions and Limitations ........................................................................................ 4

Appendices Appendix I – Figures and Photographs

Appendix II – Table 1 – Summary of Asbestos Results

Appendix III – Asbestos Laboratory Reports

Appendix IV – Copy of Inspector’s License





December 27, 2018 1

Executive Summary

S&ME performed an asbestos assessment of the structure located at 28 11th Street in Greenville, South Carolina.

The assessment was conducted by S&ME on November 30, 2018. This Executive Summary is intended as an

overview for the convenience of the reader. The complete report must be reviewed in its entirety prior to making

decisions regarding this site.

The subject structure is an approximately 1,150 square foot (SF) single-story residence built over a crawl space.

We understand the structure is scheduled for demolition. The interior is finished with drywall and plaster ceilings,

plaster ceilings, plaster walls, wood floors, floor tile, and vinyl sheet flooring. Exterior materials consist of vinyl

siding, wood framed windows, and a tin roof.

In addition a dog house and storage shed are located on the property. The dog house consists of wood siding

with no roof. The storage shed consists of metal siding with a metal roof. Neither contain any suspect ACMs.

The asbestos assessment included bulk sampling and laboratory analysis of suspect ACMs associated with the

interior and exterior of the structures. A total of 32 samples were collected including drywall with associated joint

compound, plaster, vinyl sheet flooring, floor tile, window glazing compound material, ceiling tile, and textured

ceiling.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control

(SCDHEC) define materials as asbestos-containing (ACMs) if an asbestos content of one percent or greater (> 1%)

is detected in a representative sample.

No asbestos-containing materials were identified in the residential structure, dog house or storage shed

structures.

It should also be noted that the following materials contains less than 1% asbestos:

• Mastic associated with square pattern vinyl sheet flooring, located in bedroom #1 as a bottom layer –

approximately 400 SF.

Although this material is not considered an ACM by SCDHEC and EPA, OSHA regulations apply to workers who

may potentially come in contact with or disturb these materials. Therefore, S&ME recommends this material be

treated as ACM and also be removed by a SCDHEC licensed abatement contractor prior to demolition.

This summary is for convenience only and should not be relied upon without first reading the full contents of this

report, including appended materials.





December 27, 2018 2

1.0 Introduction

S&ME was contracted by Greenville County to perform an asbestos assessment of the structure located at 28 11th

Street in Greenville, South Carolina. S&ME performed the asbestos assessment on November 30, 2018. This

assessment consisted of observing for, sampling, and analyzing suspect ACM that may be disturbed during future

demolition.

The scope of this assessment fulfills the requirements of the United States Environmental Protection Agency

(USEPA) National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPS) asbestos regulation, 40 CFR, Part

61, Subpart M, and SCDHEC Regulation 61-86.1, which requires an asbestos assessment of buildings scheduled for

renovation or demolition.

2.0 Site and Project Descriptions

2.1 Purpose

The assessment was performed to identify ACMs, prior to disturbing building materials during demolition

activities. The assessment included the interior and exterior of the building including roofing materials of the

residential structure located on the property. No additional structures were observed on the property. An

assessment strategy appropriate for this purpose was presented in our proposal and this report should be

interpreted only with regard to the specific purpose indicated.

2.2 Site Description

The subject structure is an approximately 1,150 SF single-story residence built over a crawl space foundation. We

understand the structure is scheduled for demolition. The interior is finished with drywall and plaster ceilings,

plaster ceilings, plaster walls, wood floors, floor tile, and vinyl sheet flooring. Exterior materials consist of vinyl

siding, wood framed windows, and a tin roof. Rock wool insulation is present in the attic. Fiberglass insulation is

present on the HVAC duct work.

Non-suspect materials observed and not sampled in the building include: glass, cement, fiberglass insulation, rock

wool insulation, and concrete.

The general layout of the structure is depicted in Figure 1 in Appendix I. Photographs of the suspect samples are

also included in Appendix I. Table 1, Asbestos Results Summary, is found in Appendix II, and presents a summary

of the suspect materials, material friability, condition, potential for disturbance, quantity, and asbestos analysis of

the samples collected. The laboratory results are located in Appendix II.





December 27, 2018 3

3.0 Asbestos Assessment

3.1 Sampling and Analysis

The assessment was performed by observing and sampling suspect ACMs associated with the accessible areas of

the subject building. The possibility exists that suspect materials were undetected in inaccessible areas such as

wall voids. If additional suspect ACMs not identified in this report are discovered during destructive activities, bulk

samples must be collected by a SCDHEC licensed inspector and analyzed for asbestos content prior to disturbance

or disposal of the suspect materials.

A sampling strategy was developed to provide representative samples in accordance with the SCDHEC and the

EPA. Bulk samples of suspect ACMs were collected by an SCDHEC licensed inspector. The bulk PLM and TEM

samples were submitted through chain-of-custody procedures to Eurofins CEI asbestos laboratory in Cary, North

Carolina for analysis of asbestos type and content. The laboratories are accredited by the National Voluntary

Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP), which is administered by the National Institute of Standards and

Technology.

Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM)

The suspect materials were analyzed by trained microscopists using PLM techniques coupled with dispersion

staining in accordance with EPA Test Method Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter I (1-1-87 edition), Part

763, Subpart F-APPENDIX A. This method identifies asbestos mineral fibers based on six optical characteristics:

morphology, birefringence, refractive index, extinction angle, sign of elongation and dispersion staining colors.

The laboratory analysis reports the specific type of asbestos identified (there are six asbestos minerals) and the

percentage of asbestos present.

Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)

Suspect non-friable organically bound materials, exhibiting negative results via PLM analysis, were analyzed by

trained microscopists by TEM using EPA 600 Method in accordance with ASTM E2356. Typical examples of this

material include, but are not limited to floor tile, mastic adhesives, sheet flooring (linoleum), roofing materials,

glazing, caulking, duct mastic and cove base mastic.

3.2 Assessment

The sampled materials were assessed based on condition (good, fair or poor) and potential for disturbance due to

the scheduled renovation/demolition. The sampled materials were also categorized based on the EPA’s National

Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) regulation categories. Friable ACM is classified as an

ACM that can be crumbled to a powder by moderate hand pressure. Non-friable ACM is classified as either

Category I Non-friable ACM or Category II Non-friable ACM. Category I and Category II Non-friable ACM are

distinguished from each other by their fiber release potential when damaged. Generally, Category I Non-friable

ACM, which by definition includes intact ACM roofing materials, gaskets, packing, resilient floor coverings and

floor mastics, is less likely to become friable and release fibers in a damaged state. Category II Non-friable ACM

include all other non-friable ACM excluding Category I that have a high probability of being rendered friable





December 27, 2018 4

during removal activities or demolition. All Friable ACM, Category I Non-friable ACM that has become friable,

Category I Non-friable ACM that will be or has been subjected to sanding, grinding, cutting or abrading, or

Category II Non-friable ACM that has a high probability of becoming or has become crumbled, pulverized, or

reduced to powder by the forces expected to act on the material in the course of demolition or renovation

operations are considered to be a Regulated Asbestos-Containing Material (RACM).

3.3 Findings and Results

The EPA and SCDHEC define materials as asbestos containing when an asbestos content >1% is detected in a

representative sample.

No asbestos-containing materials were identified in the residential structure, dog house or storage shed

structures.

In accordance with SCDHEC Regulation 61-86.1, TEM analysis was performed on one sample of each of the non-

friable, organically-bound (NOB) materials that displayed a result of no asbestos detected or less than 1%

asbestos via PLM analysis. NOBs consist of materials such as vinyl floor tiles, vinyl baseboards and mastics. Please

refer to Table 1 in Appendix II for more detail regarding which samples of NOB materials were submitted for TEM

analysis.

It should also be noted that the following materials contains less than 1% asbestos:

• Mastic associated with square pattern vinyl sheet flooring, located in bedroom #1 as a bottom layer –

approximately 400 SF.

Although this material is not considered an ACM by SCDHEC and EPA, OSHA regulations apply to workers who

may potentially come in contact with or disturb these materials. Therefore, S&ME recommends this material be

treated as ACM and also be removed by a SCDHEC licensed abatement contractor prior to demolition.

4.0 Assumptions and Limitations

This report is provided for the sole use of the Client. Use of this report by any other parties will be at such party’s

sole risk, and S&ME disclaims liability for any such use or reliance by third parties. The results presented in this

report are indicative of conditions only during the time of the sampling period and of the specific areas

referenced. Under no circumstances is this report to be used as a bidding document, or as a project design or

specification.

S&ME performed the services in accordance with generally accepted practices of reputable environmental

consultants undertaking similar studies at the same time and in the same geographical area. S&ME has

endeavored to meet this standard of care. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is intended or made with

respect to this report or S&ME’s services. Users of this report should consider the scope and limitations related to

these services when developing opinions as to risks associated with the site.





December 27, 2018 5

The possibility exists that suspect materials were undetected in inaccessible or concealed areas such as under

carpeting or multiple flooring layers, and inside pipe chases or wall voids. If additional suspect materials are

discovered during the planned destructive activities, bulk samples must be collected by an asbestos inspector and

analyzed for asbestos content.

5.0 Conclusions and Recommendations

No asbestos-containing materials were identified in the building. Therefore, no specific recommendations are

made at this time. If the structure remains unchanged from the condition observed during the performance of

this assessment, the report will remain valid for three years.

This report should be provided to the contractor(s) to assist with compliance with applicable State and Federal

regulations. If additional suspect materials are discovered during renovation activities, bulk samples must be

collected and analyzed for asbestos content prior to continuation of work.

Appendices

Appendix I – Figures and Photographs

FIGURE NO.

CHECKED BY: SW 28 11th Street1

DRAWN BY: TRW Greenville, South Carolina

SCALE: NTS Approximate Asbestos Sample Locations

DATE: 11/30/2018 Project Number : 4226-18-003 Phase 47

D1

C1

Kitchen

Structure #3Structure #2

Back Porch

Living Room

C2

D2

H2Bedroom #1

E2

Front Porch

I3

A3, B3

F5

A1, B1

E1

A2, B2

J2

J1

J3

G1

Bedroom #2

Bathroom

Foyer

F1

F2

D3

I1

F4

E3

G3, I2

G2

F3

H1

H3

C3

Asbestos Assessment

28 11th Street


S&ME Project # 4226-18-003 Phase 47

Taken by: Taylor Williams Date Taken: 11/30/2018

1

1 General view of the front of the main structure. 2 General view of the back of the main structure.

3 General view of the crawl space of the main structure. 4 General view of the roof of the main structure.

Asbestos Assessment

28 11th Street




2

5 General view of Structure #2. . 6 General view of Structure #3.

7 General interior view of Structure #3. 8 Sample A: Rock pattern vinyl sheet flooring (top layer).

No asbestos detected.

Asbestos Assessment

28 11th Street




3

9 Sample B: Square pattern vinyl sheet flooring (bottom layer).

No asbestos detected. 10 Sample C: 18-inch tan floor tile with yellow mastic.


11 Sample D: 18-inch gray floor tile with yellow mastic.

No asbestos detected. 12 Sample E: 18-inch brown rock pattern floor tile with black mastic.


Asbestos Assessment

28 11th Street




4

13 Sample F: Plaster.

No asbestos detected. 14 Sample G: Drywall and joint compound.


15 Sample H: 2’ x 2’ grooved ceiling tile.

No asbestos detected. 16 Sample I: Textured ceiling.


Asbestos Assessment

28 11th Street




5

No Photo

17 Sample J: Window glazing.

No asbestos detected. 18

No Photo No Photo

19 20

Appendix II – Table 1 – Summary of Asbestos Results

A1

A2

A3

(TEM)

B1

B2

B3

(TEM)

C1

C2

C3

(TEM)

D1

D2

D3

(TEM)

E1

E2

E3

(TEM)

F1

F2

F3

F4

F5

G1

G2

G3

H1

H2

H3

I1

I2

I3

LPD 75 SF

Drywall - NAD

Joint Compound - NADFriable Good LPD 600 SF

Table 1

Asbestos Results Summary


Estimated

Quantity

Sample

NumberAnalytical Results


Friable /

Non-Friable

Current

Condition

Potential for

Disturbance

28 11th Street

Sample Description Location

18-inch Tan Floor Tile

with Yellow Mastic

Foyer - patterned floor tile

layout

Tile - NAD

Mastic - NAD

18-inch Gray Floor Tile

with Yellow Mastic

Foyer and Kitchen -

patterned floor tile layout

Tile - NAD

Mastic - NAD

Plaster Skim Coat - NAD

Base Coat - NAD

Walls: Bedroom #2 and Hallway

Ceilings: Both Bedrooms and

Kitchen

Drywall and Joint CompoundCeilings: Living Room, Hallway,

and Bathroom

18-inch Brown Rock Pattern Floor

Tile with Brown Mastic

Kitchen - patterned floor tile

layout

Tile - NAD

Mastic - NAD

25 SFNon-Friable Good LPD

Non-Friable Good LPD 150 SF

1500 SFLPDGoodFriable

Non-Friable Good

LPD 400 SF

Rock Pattern Vinyl Sheet Flooring

(top layer)Bedroom #1

Vinyl Flooring - NAD

Mastic - NADNon-Friable Damaged PD 400 SF

Square Pattern Vinyl Sheet

Flooring (bottom layer)Bedroom #1

Vinyl Flooring - NAD

Mastic - < 1% ChrysotileNon-Friable Good

Foyer NAD Friable Good2' x 2' Carpet Ceiling Tile

Textured Ceiling

LPD 40 SF

Living Room NAD Friable Good LPD 350 SF

Table 1

Asbestos Results Summary


Estimated

Quantity

Sample

NumberAnalytical Results


Friable /

Non-Friable

Current

Condition

Potential for

Disturbance

28 11th Street

Sample Description Location

J1

J2

J3

(TEM)

1) Quantities listed above are estimates to be used for inspection purposes only.

2) Samples shown in bold are designated as asbestos-containing materials (ACMs).

3) Sampled by Taylor Williams, SCDHEC License No. 01602.

NAD - No Asbestos Detected

Samples analyzed by PLM - Polarized Light Microscopy.

PACM - Presumed Asbestos Containing Material

NOTES:

SF - square feet

LF - linear feet

CF - cubic feet

Window Glazing Windows 250 LFLPDGoodNon-FriableNAD

Appendix III – Asbestos Laboratory Reports

December 4, 2018

S&ME48 Brookfield Oaks Dr, Suite FGreenville, SC 29607

CLIENT PROJECT: 28 11th Street, 4226-18-003 Phase 47CEI LAB CODE: A1816175

Dear Customer:

Enclosed are asbestos analysis results for PLM Bulk samples received at our laboratory onDecember 3, 2018. The samples were analyzed for asbestos using polarizing light microscopy(PLM) per the EPA 600 Method.

Sample results containing >1% asbestos are considered asbestos-containing materials(ACMs) per EPA regulatory requirements. The detection limit for the EPA 600 Method is <1%asbestos by weight as determined by visual estimation.

Thank you for your business and we look forward to continuing good relations.

730 SE Maynard Road • Cary, NC 27511 • 919.481.1413

Tianbao Bai, Ph.D., CIHLaboratory Director

Kind Regards,

ASBESTOS ANALYTICAL REPORTBy: Polarized Light Microscopy

Prepared for

S&ME

CLIENT PROJECT:

LAB CODE:

TEST METHOD: EPA 600 / R93 / 116 and EPA 600 / M4-82 / 020

REPORT DATE:

TOTAL SAMPLES ANALYZED:

# SAMPLES >1% ASBESTOS:

28 11th Street, 4226-18-003 Phase 47

A1816175

26

12/04/18

Asbestos Report SummaryBy: POLARIZING LIGHT MICROSCOPY

PROJECT: 28 11th Street, 4226-18-003 Phase 47 LAB CODE: A1816175

Client ID Lab ID Color Sample DescriptionASBESTOS

%Layer

METHOD: EPA 600 / R93 / 116 and EPA 600 / M4-82 / 020

Layer 1 A199271 Tan,Black Vinyl Flooring None DetectedA1

Layer 2 A199271 Brown Mastic None Detected

Layer 1 A199272 Tan,Black Vinyl Flooring None DetectedA2


Layer 1 A199273 Sample Submitted for TEMAnalysis

A3


Layer 1 A199274 Tan,Green Vinyl Flooring None DetectedB1


Layer 1 A199275 Tan,Green Vinyl Flooring None DetectedB2



B3


A199277A Tan,Gray Floor Tile None DetectedC1

A199277B Yellow Mastic None Detected

A199278A Tan,Gray Floor Tile None DetectedC2


A199279A Sample Submitted for TEMAnalysis

C3

A199279B Sample Submitted for TEMAnalysis

A199280A Gray Floor Tile None DetectedD1


A199281A Gray Floor Tile None DetectedD2



D3


A199283A Brown Floor Tile None DetectedE1

Page 1 of 3




%Layer


A199283B Brown Mastic None Detected

A199284A Brown Floor Tile None DetectedE2

A199284B Brown Mastic None Detected


E3


Layer 1 A199286 White Plaster Skim Coat None DetectedF1

Layer 2 A199286 Tan Plaster Base Coat None Detected









Layer 1 A199291 White,Tan Drywall None DetectedG1

Layer 2 A199291 White Joint Compound None Detected





A199294 Silver,Gray Ceiling Tile None DetectedH1



A199297 Off-white Texture None DetectedI1



A199300 White Window Glazing None DetectedJ1

A199301 White Window Glazing None DetectedJ2

Page 2 of 3




%Layer


A199302 Sample Submitted for TEMAnalysis

J3

Page 3 of 3

ASBESTOS BULK ANALYSISBy: POLARIZING LIGHT MICROSCOPY

Lab Code: A1816175Date Received: 12-03-18Date Analyzed: 12-04-18Date Reported: 12-04-18

Client IDLab ID

LabAttributes

LabDescription

ASBESTOS%

ASBESTOS BULK PLM, EPA 600 METHODNON-ASBESTOS COMPONENTS

Non-Fibrous

Client: S&ME48 Brookfield Oaks Dr, Suite FGreenville, SC 29607

Project: 28 11th Street, 4226-18-003 Phase 47

Fibrous

Tan,BlackA1

A199271

60%Heterogeneous

FibrousBound

20%20%

Cellulose VinylTar

None DetectedLayer 1

Vinyl Flooring

BrownMastic

A199271Homogeneous

Non-fibrousBound

100% Mastic None DetectedLayer 2

Tan,BlackA2

A199272

60%Heterogeneous

FibrousBound

20%20%

Cellulose VinylTar


Vinyl Flooring

BrownMastic

A199272Homogeneous

Non-fibrousBound


A3

A199273Layer 1

Sample Submitted forTEM Analysis

Sample Submitted forTEM AnalysisA199273

Layer 2

Tan,GreenB1

A199274

60%Heterogeneous

FibrousBound

20%20%

Cellulose VinylTar


Vinyl Flooring

BrownMastic

A199274Homogeneous

Non-fibrousBound


Page 1 of 8



Client IDLab ID

LabAttributes

LabDescription

ASBESTOS%


Non-Fibrous



Fibrous

Tan,GreenB2

A199275

60%Heterogeneous

FibrousBound

20%20%

Cellulose VinylTar


Vinyl Flooring

BrownMastic

A199275Homogeneous

Non-fibrousBound


B3

A199276Layer 1


Sample Submitted forTEM AnalysisA199276

Layer 2

Tan,GrayFloor TileC1

A199277AHomogeneous

Non-fibrousBound

100% Vinyl None Detected

YellowMasticA199277B Homogeneous

Non-fibrousBound

100% Mastic None Detected

Tan,GrayFloor TileC2

A199278AHomogeneous

Non-fibrousBound



Non-fibrousBound


Page 2 of 8



Client IDLab ID

LabAttributes

LabDescription

ASBESTOS%


Non-Fibrous



Fibrous


C3A199279A


A199279B

GrayFloor TileD1

A199280AHomogeneous

Non-fibrousBound



Non-fibrousBound


GrayFloor TileD2

A199281AHomogeneous

Non-fibrousBound



Non-fibrousBound



D3A199282A


A199282B

BrownFloor TileE1

A199283AHomogeneous

Non-fibrousBound


Page 3 of 8



Client IDLab ID

LabAttributes

LabDescription

ASBESTOS%


Non-Fibrous



Fibrous

BrownMasticA199283B Homogeneous

Non-fibrousBound


BrownFloor TileE2

A199284AHomogeneous

Non-fibrousBound


BrownMasticA199284B Homogeneous

Non-fibrousBound



E3A199285A


A199285B

WhiteF1

A199286

Homogeneous

Non-fibrousBound

60%35%5%

BinderSilicatesPaint


Plaster Skim Coat

TanPlaster Base Coat

A199286Homogeneous

Non-fibrousBound

40%60%

BinderSilicates


WhiteF2

A199287

Homogeneous

Non-fibrousBound

60%35%5%



Plaster Skim Coat

Page 4 of 8



Client IDLab ID

LabAttributes

LabDescription

ASBESTOS%


Non-Fibrous



Fibrous


A199287Homogeneous

Non-fibrousBound

40%60%

BinderSilicates


WhiteF3

A199288

Homogeneous

Non-fibrousBound

60%35%5%



Plaster Skim Coat


A199288Homogeneous

Non-fibrousBound

40%60%

BinderSilicates


WhiteF4

A199289

Homogeneous

Non-fibrousBound

60%35%5%



Plaster Skim Coat


A199289Homogeneous

Non-fibrousBound

40%60%

BinderSilicates


WhiteF5

A199290

Homogeneous

Non-fibrousBound

60%35%5%



Plaster Skim Coat


A199290Homogeneous

Non-fibrousBound

40%60%

BinderSilicates


Page 5 of 8



Client IDLab ID

LabAttributes

LabDescription

ASBESTOS%


Non-Fibrous



Fibrous

White,TanG1

A199291

20%Heterogeneous

FibrousBound

80%Cellulose Gypsum None DetectedLayer 1

Drywall

WhiteJoint Compound

A199291Homogeneous

Non-fibrousBound

60%40%<1%

BinderCalc CarbPaint


White,TanG2

A199292

20%Heterogeneous

FibrousBound


Drywall

WhiteJoint Compound

A199292Homogeneous

Non-fibrousBound

60%40%<1%



White,TanG3

A199293

20%Heterogeneous

FibrousBound


Drywall

WhiteJoint Compound

A199293Homogeneous

Non-fibrousBound

60%40%<1%



Silver,GrayCeiling TileH1

A19929410%80%

Heterogeneous

FibrousLoosely Bound

10%CelluloseMineral Wool

Metal Foil None Detected

Page 6 of 8



Client IDLab ID

LabAttributes

LabDescription

ASBESTOS%


Non-Fibrous



Fibrous


A19929510%80%

Heterogeneous





A19929610%80%

Heterogeneous




Off-whiteTextureI1

A1992975%Homogeneous

Non-fibrousBound

55%35%5%

Cellulose BinderFoamPaint

None Detected

Off-whiteTextureI2


Non-fibrousBound

55%35%5%


None Detected

Off-whiteTextureI3


Non-fibrousBound

55%35%5%


None Detected

WhiteWindow GlazingJ1

A199300Homogeneous

Non-fibrousBound

100% Binder None Detected

WhiteWindow GlazingJ2

A199301Homogeneous

Non-fibrousBound

100% Binder None Detected


J3A199302

Page 7 of 8

LEGEND: Non-Anth = Non-Asbestiform AnthophylliteNon-Trem = Non-Asbestiform TremoliteCalc Carb = Calcium Carbonate


REPORTING LIMIT: <1% by visual estimation

REPORTING LIMIT FOR POINT COUNTS: 0.25% by 400 Points or 0.1% by 1,000 Points

REGULATORY LIMIT: >1% by weight

Due to the limitations of the EPA 600 method, nonfriable organically bound materials (NOBs) such asvinyl floor tiles can be difficult to analyze via polarized light microscopy (PLM). EPA recommends thatall NOBs analyzed by PLM, and found not to contain asbestos, be further analyzed by TransmissionElectron Microscopy (TEM). Please note that PLM analysis of dust and soil samples for asbestos isnot covered under NVLAP accreditation. Estimated measurement of uncertainty is available onrequest.

This report relates only to the samples tested or analyzed and may not be reproduced, except in full,without written approval by Eurofins CEI. Eurofins CEI makes no warranty representation regardingthe accuracy of client submitted information in preparing and presenting analytical results.Interpretation of the analytical results is the sole responsibility of the client. Samples were received inacceptable condition unless otherwise noted. This report may not be used by the client to claimproduct endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government.

Information provided by customer includes customer sample ID, location, volume and area as well asdate and time of sampling.

Page 8 of 8

ANALYST: APPROVED BY:Tianbao Bai, Ph.D., CIHLaboratory Director

Megan Fisher

December 6, 2018

S&ME48 Brookfield Oaks Dr, Suite FGreenville, SC 29607

CLIENT PROJECT: 28 11th Street, 4226-18-003 Phase 47LAB CODE: T182889

Dear Customer:

Enclosed are asbestos analysis results for TEM bulk samples received at our laboratory onDecember 4, 2018. The samples were analyzed for asbestos using transmission electronmicroscopy (TEM) per Chatfield Method.

Sample results containing > 1% asbestos are considered asbestos-containing materials(ACMs) per the EPA regulatory requirements. The detection limit for the TEM Chatfieldmethod is <1% depending on the processed weight and constituents of the sample.

Thank you for your business and we look forward to continuing good relations.

730 SE Maynard Road • Cary, NC 27511 • 919.481.1413

Tianbao Bai, Ph.D., CIHLaboratory Director

Kind Regards,

ASBESTOS ANALYTICAL REPORTBy: Transmission Electron Microscopy

Prepared for

S&ME

CLIENT PROJECT:

LAB CODE:

TEST METHOD: Bulk ChatfieldEPA 600 / R93 / 116

REPORT DATE:

28 11th Street, 4226-18-003 Phase 47

T182889

12/06/18

ASBESTOS BULK ANALYSISBy: TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY

Lab Code: T182889Date Received: 12-04-18Date Analyzed: 12-05-18Date Reported: 12-06-18

Client IDLab ID

MaterialDescription

TEM BULK CHATFIELD / EPA 600 / R93 / 116



SampleWeight

(g)

OrganicMaterial

%

Acid SolubleMaterial

%

Acid InsolubleMaterial

%Asbestos

%

T88542A3 Vinyl Flooring 0.212 71.2 28.3 .5 None

Detected

T88543A3 Mastic 0.109 76.1 22.9 1 None

Detected

T88544B3 Vinyl Flooring 0.414 69.8 25.1 5.1 None

Detected

T88545B3 Mastic 0.107 76.6 22.4 1 <1% Chrysotile

T88546C3 Floor Tile 0.492 36.4 57.9 5.7 None

Detected

T88547C3 Mastic 0.135 86.7 9.6 3.7 None

Detected

T88548D3 Floor Tile 0.585 49.1 49.7 1.2 None

Detected

T88549D3 Mastic 0.138 84.8 13.8 1.4 None

Detected

T88550E3 Floor Tile 0.423 45.4 50.1 4.5 None

Detected

T88551E3 Mastic 0.192 90.6 4.2 5.2 None

Detected

T88552J3 Window Glazing 0.582 12.4 84.9 2.7 None

Detected

Page 1 of 2

LEGEND: None

METHOD: CHATFIELD & EPA/600/R-93/116

LIMIT OF DETECTION: Varies with the weight and constituents of the sample (<1%)

REGULATORY LIMIT: >1% by weight

This report relates only to the samples tested or analyzed and may not be reproduced, except in full,without written approval by Eurofins CEI. Eurofins CEI makes no warranty representation regardingthe accuracy of client submitted information in preparing and presenting analytical results.Interpretation of the analytical results is the sole responsibility of the client. Estimated measurement ofuncertainty is available on request. Samples were received in acceptable condition unless otherwisenoted.

Information provided by customer includes customer sample ID, location, volume and area as well asdate and time of sampling.

Page 2 of 2

ANALYST: APPROVED BY:Tianbao Bai, Ph.D., CIHLaboratory Director

Brunilda Gjoka

Appendix IV – Copy of Inspector’s License

S&ME, Inc. | 48 Brookfield Oaks Drive, Suite F | Greenville, SC 29607 | p 864.297-9944 | www.smeinc.com

South Carolina Department

of

Health and Environmental Control

Asbestos License

Taylor R Williams