15
Technical Assistance and Supervision for ISPA Contracts in Deva - Hunedoara General Site and Contract Supervision Manual November 2007 Annex A3-1 Standard Format Draft in English, Translate into Romanian Report No….…… (same number as the proforma) DESIGN REVIEW and /or APPROVAL REPORT Contract Name……………………………………………………………………. Contractor’s Submittal Name………………………………………………….. Report Prepared by : Date Issued to: 1. ……………………………………… 2. ……………………………………… 3. ……………………………………… 4. ……………………………………… 5. ……………………………………… ……………… ……………… ……………… ……………… ……………… The Proforma Design Review and /or Approval Interim Report cover sheet forms an integral part of this Report and shall be read with this Report. Particular attention shall be given by all Parties to the need for compliance with Contractual dates. ______________________________________________________________________________________________ ______ Annex A3-1 Design Review Report Page 1

6[1]. A3-1 Design Review Report - Final

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

model

Citation preview

Technical Assistance and Supervision for ISPA Contracts in Deva - HunedoaraGeneral Site and Contract Supervision ManualNovember 2007Annex A3-1Standard Format Draft in English, ranslate into !omanianReport No.(same number as the proforma)DES"#N !E$"E% and &or A''!($A) !E'(!*ontra+t Name,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-*ontra+tor.s S/bmittal Name,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,--Report Prepared by : DateIssued to:1. 2. 3. 4. 5. The Proforma Design Review and /or Approval Interim Report cover sheet forms an integral part ofthis Report and shall be read with this Report. Particular attention shall be given b all Parties to theneed for compliance with !ontractual dates.____________________________________________________________________________________________________Annex A3-1 Design Reie! Report Page 1Technical Assistance and Supervision for ISPA Contracts in Deva - HunedoaraGeneral Site and Contract Supervision ManualNovember 2007Exe+/tive S/mmar0"#e $ontra%tor sub&itted #is design 'or t#e aboe portion (or in the unli"el event# state the $hole)o' t#e (or)s 'or approa* under t#e $ontra%t. "#e +ngineer initia**y %ondu%ted a brie' pre*i&inary oerie! to estab*is# !#et#er t#e sub&itta* !assub&itted substantia**y in a%%ordan%e !it# t#e proisions o' t#e $ontra%t. ,e %on%*uded t#at (chooseone and delete the other two) (%) detailedreviewshouldbeunderta"en# theresults of whicharepresentedinthisReport. The &ngineerissueda cop of the !ontractor's submittal to the &mploer forreview in parallel. (() the submittal was significantl non)responsive# b the omission of considerable detailthat in the opinion of the &ngineer would prevent a proper appraisal to be underta"en.The &mploer agreed with this assessment. The &ngineer therefore re*ected the submittal#a cop of the re*ection letter having been copied to the &mploer. (+) the submittal related to a portion of the $or"s# but in the opinion of the &ngineer# thedesignimpactedonother aspects of the$or"s preventingaholistic appraisal andassessment of conse,uential effectsof thedesignassubmittedonotherareasof the$or"s. The &mploer agreed with this assessment. Accordingl# the submittal wasre*ected and the !ontractor was re,uested to remed the omission. If option (() above is applicable# then there should be nothing further to include in this report.If option(+) aboveisapplicable# thenthereshouldbenothingfurthertoincludeinthisreport#because the &ngineer's response to the !ontractor will detail all that is wrong with the submittal andthat letter is copied to the &mploer.If option (%) is applicable# then the Report shall continue as shown below.-o**o!ing detai*ed reie!. t#e +ngineer %onsiders t#at (choose one and delete the other two) (-) the submittal complies with the re,uirements of the !ontract and ma be accepted withoutreservation. Accordingl# the &ngineer invites the &mploer to endorse the attached InterimDesignReport beforethe&ngineernotifiesthe!ontractor. the&mploerhavingalreadconfirmed his comments on the submittal to the &ngineer. (/) the submittal does not compl with the re,uirements of the !ontract in all respects# butthat ,ualified acceptance ma be given. The ,ualifications are detailed in Appendi0 %. The,ualifications arenotsignificant enoughtore*ectthe submittaloutright#andthe ,ualifiedacceptance will enable the !ontractor to proceed with certain areas of the wor" so that anpotential dela tothe programme is minimised. Accordingl# the !onsultant invites the&mploertoendorsetheattachedInterimDesignReport beforethe&ngineernotifiesthe!ontractor.the&mploerhavingalreadconfirmedhiscommentsonthesubmittaltothe&ngineer. (1) the submittal is unacceptable# and should be re*ected. The reasons for the re*ection aredetailedinAppendi0%. Accordingl#the!onsultant invitesthe&mploertoendorsetheattached Interim Design Report before the &ngineer notifies the !ontractor. the &mploerhaving alread confirmed his comments on the submittal to the &ngineer. S/b1e+t 2atter of the Design S/bmittal (chose one or other version# delete the other)"#e $ontra%tor/s sub&itta* is 'or $on%eptua* Design 'or ..state scope2222. Pre*i&inary Design 'or ..state scope. Detai*ed Design 'or..state scope.____________________________________________________________________________________________________Annex A3-1 Design Reie! Report Page 2Technical Assistance and Supervision for ISPA Contracts in Deva - HunedoaraGeneral Site and Contract Supervision ManualNovember 2007 Do+/ments Forming the Design S/bmittal"#edo%u&ents%o&prisingt#edesignsub&itta* are*istedint#e$ontra%tor/s*etterdated.and in Appendix A3-1.2. "nitial !evie3 b0 the Engineer"#e+ngineer/s "ea&%ondu%tedaninitia*reie!.!#i%#!asdire%tedatensuringt#at t#esub&itta* !as su''i%ient*y %o&p*ete to 'a%i*itate a detai*ed reie!o' t#e $ontra%tor/sob0e%tie and sub0e%t o' t#e sub&itta*. "#is in%*uded a pre*i&inary appraisa* o' t#e &atterst#at !ou*d re1uire to be exa&ined. re*eant %ontra%tua* proisions re*ating to t#e s%ope o' t#esub&itta*. and !#et#er t#ere !ere any &ateria* o&issions t#at !ou*d preent a 'u** reie!."#e resu*ts o' t#is initia* reie! are detai*ed in Appendix A3-1.3."#e +ngineer %on%*udedt#at t#e extent o' detai* proidedsu''i%ient data to&a)e t#esub&itta* !ort#y o' detai*ed reie!. *on+e4t/al Design"#e$ontra%tor #as2#as not(deleteas appropriate)&odi'ied#is approa%#tot#edesignob0e%ties. %o&pared to #is a%%epted "ender and !#i%# 'or&s part o' t#e $ontra%t. !hoose one of the following and delete the other two.(3) This submittal has not been sub*ect to a 4alue engineering stud. It should be noted thatthe decision to refer it to such a stud is for the !ontractor to ma"e# or for the &mploer tore,uest a 4ariation to the !ontract.(5) The scope of this submittal has been sub*ected to a 4alue &ngineering stud that has beenpreviousl approved b the &mploer and the &ngineer under Design Review Report 6umber2..(enter number)(7) This submittal is in respect of a 4alue &ngineering proposal# and has been treated as adesign submittal so that the proposal is properl assessed."#e e*e&ents o' t#e design t#at #ae been identi'ied and studied in%*ude: Pro%ess design in%*uding ana*ysis o' 3!#at i'4 operationa* s%enarios 5perationa* $onsiderations. bot# during %onstru%tion and a'ter $o&p*etion. 'oro 6ini&a* disruption to t#e existing operationa* 'un%tion. and%o&p*ian%e !it# spe%i'ied re1uire&ents in respe%t o'te&porary s#utdo!ns o A%%ess and &aintenan%eo Running %osts 7round $onditions. !#ere re*eant 8u''i%ien%y o' surey data espe%ia**y !#ere reuse o' existing 'a%i*ities are ino*ed. Ade1ua%y o' intended !or)s to re#abi*itate existing e*e&ents 'or reuse. Ade1ua%yo'appraisa* byt#e$ontra%toro't#esituationinrespe%t o'useo'any3-ree Issue4 &ateria*s proided by t#e +&p*oyer 8a'ety during %onstru%tion and on %o&p*etion in%*uding ,A95P8 !#ere re*eant. +niron&enta* $onsiderations -uture extensionsDetai*edsu&&ariesare%ontainedin AppendixA3-1.4. "#e+ngineer%on%*udest#at t#e%on%eptua* design is is2not a%%eptab*e. (Delete as appropriate)____________________________________________________________________________________________________Annex A3-1 Design Reie! Report Page 3Technical Assistance and Supervision for ISPA Contracts in Deva - HunedoaraGeneral Site and Contract Supervision ManualNovember 2007 Detailed Design"#e e*e&ents o' t#e design t#at #ae been identi'ied and studied in%*ude t#e sa&e #eadings as'or $on%eptua* Design. p*us 'urt#er e*e&ents in%*uding detai*ed bui*ding2%ii*2stru%tura* design detai*ed &e%#ani%a* design detai*ed e*e%tri%a* and 8$ADA design reappraisa* o' %on%eptua* design !#ere re*eantDetai*edsu&&aries are%ontainedinAppendixA3-1.5. "#e+ngineer %on%*udes t#at t#edetai*ed design is is2not a%%eptab*e. (delete as appropriate) !is5 Anal0sisA ris) ana*ysis #as been %arried out. as s#o!n in Appendix A3-1.:. "#e +ngineer %on%*udest#at t#e sub&itta* (choose one# delete the other two) (%8) carries no additional ris" compared to what is normal for a Pro*ect such as this. (%%) carries some ris" which the &ngineer considers is acceptable in all thecircumstances. $here relevant as construction proceeds# the &ngineer ma elect todirect the !ontractor to underta"e further surve# revise his programme# or submitmore detailed information# so that the perceived ris" is managed to the e0tent that ispracticable (%()carriesunacceptableris"andforthisreasonthedesignsubmittalshouldbere*ected or the approval ,ualified. Environmental "m4a+t"#ere is noper%eiedaderse +niron&enta* I&pa%t %o&pared tot#e tender situation.!hange onl if this statement is not true# and then the impact is considered as a ris" identifiedin section 1 above) *osts*a4ital *osts 6 "#e sub&itta* #as no i&pa%t on t#e $ontra%t Pri%e. and t#ere'ore no 'inan%ia*;ariations are re1uired. (!hange as re,uired onl if the submittal is sub*ect to 9!! clause %+:but not incidental da wor") (4erating *osts 6 "#e sub&itta* does not appear to resu*t in operating %osts t#at !i** ex%eedt#e guaranteed proisions in t#e $ontra%t.(6ote that it is assumed that the !ontractor willhave sorted this out before submittal. ;ut if not and the costs are considered to be too high#thenit will beacaseof re*ecting# orgiving,ualifiedacceptancetothedesignandthe!ontractor will have the choice of disputing the assessment and/or resubmitting in part or inwhole.) 'rogrammeThis will need a statement on the actual situation. The primar ob*ective is to sa that theapproved programme is not affected# if it is possible to sa that. ;e ver careful about thecomments here if the report is a 4alue &ngineering stud. ong "er&2.3. A%%ess and 6aintenan%e2.4. Running $osts3- #!(?ND *(ND""(NS>- S?FF"*"EN*= ofDES"#N DAA in+l/ding S?!$E= DAA@- ADE8?A*= (F '!('(SA)S F(! *(NS!?*"(N (! !EAAB")"A"(N5.1. 8"RC$"CR+85.2. ACI>DIN785.3. 6+$,ANI$A>5.4. +>+$"RI$A> 5.5. PIP+>IN+85.:. 5",+RC- F!EE "SS?E 2AE!"A)S7- SAFE=D.1. I6PA$" 5- D+8I7N 5N $5N8"RIC$"I5ND.2. 5N $56P>+"I5ND.3. ,A9ARDD- EN$"!(N2ENA) *(NS"DE!A"(NSE- F??!E E7ENS"(NS____________________________________________________________________________________________________Annex A3-1 Design Reie! Report Page FTechnical Assistance and Supervision for ISPA Contracts in Deva - HunedoaraGeneral Site and Contract Supervision ManualNovember 2007A''END"7 A3-1-@Detailed S/mmar0 of Detailed Design *onsiderations6ote : $here a particular heading does not appl to the design under review# then enter NotApp*i%ab*e against that heading.1- '!(*ESS1.1. Pro%ess Des%ription and $a*%u*ations1.2. -D8 < -un%tiona* Design 8pe%i'i%ation1.3. ,ydrau*i% %a*%u*ations1.4. P H I Diagra&2- ('E!A"(NA) *(NS"DE!A"(NS2.1. +''e%t on +xisting 5peration during $onstru%tion2.2. >ong "er&2.3. A%%ess and 6aintenan%e2.4. Running $osts3- #!(?ND *(ND""(NS>- S?FF"*"EN*= ofDES"#N DAA in+l/ding S?!$E= DAA@- ADE8?A*= (F '!('(SA)S F(! *(NS!?*"(N (! !EAAB")"A"(N5.1. 8"RC$"CR+85.2. ACI>DIN785.3. 6+$,ANI$A>5.4. +>+$"RI$A> 5.5. PIP+>IN+85.:. 5",+RC- F!EE "SS?E 2AE!"A)S7- SAFE=7-1- "2'A* (F DES"#N (N *(NS!?*"(ND.2. 5N $56P>+"I5ND.3. ,A9ARD____________________________________________________________________________________________________Annex A3-1 Design Reie! Report Page 1GTechnical Assistance and Supervision for ISPA Contracts in Deva - HunedoaraGeneral Site and Contract Supervision ManualNovember 2007D- EN$"!(N2ENA) *(NS"DE!A"(NSE- F??!E E7ENS"(NS10- DEA")ED *"$") DES"#N in+l/ding #ENE!A) A!!AN#E2ENS11- DEA")ED '"'E)"NE DES"#N12- DEA")ED ?NNE) DES"#N13- DEA")ED S!?*?!A) DES"#N1>- DEA")ED 2E*AAN"*A) DES"#N1@- DEA")ED E)E*!"*A) DES"#N1C- DEA")ED S*ADA F *(N!() DES"#N17- !EA''!A"SA) (F *(N*E'?A) DES"#N 3ith res4e+t to DEA")ED DES"#NNote 6 In a** %ases. t#e reie! s#a** be %ondu%ted against t#e $ontra%t to ensure %o&p*ian%e !it# t#e$ontra%t re1uire&ents in%*uding any spe%i'ied Per'or&an%e 7uarantees and issued ;ariations.____________________________________________________________________________________________________Annex A3-1 Design Reie! Report Page 11Technical Assistance and Supervision for ISPA Contracts in Deva - HunedoaraGeneral Site and Contract Supervision ManualNovember 2007A''END"7 A3-1.C!is5 Anal0sis !elating to Design 'ro4osalsS/mmar0!ef AAGA!D !"SHA'')"*AB)E=es&NoA**E'AB)E=es&No1 Insu''i%ient site data Inappropriate design2 Inter'a%e !it# 5ps3 Di''i%u*t stru%ture 8a'ety4 Di''i%u*t stru%ture Progra&&e5 -ree Issue 6ateria* Cn)no!n $ondition:D Above are e0amples onlEF1G*omments on 'er+eived !is5s!is5 1- !is5 2-!is5 3-____________________________________________________________________________________________________Annex A3-1 Design Reie! Report Page 12