7th_DayPac

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/6/2019 7th_DayPac

    1/42

  • 8/6/2019 7th_DayPac

    2/42

    Outlook Brief background history

    Objectives of Pre-admission Clinics (PAC)

    Who should be seen in PAC

    Classification of physical status Patient assessment by organ system

    Conclusion

    Questions

  • 8/6/2019 7th_DayPac

    3/42

    Background 1

    1992: 6% DOSA (Liverpool Hospital) 6,700 elective admissions

    1994: 35% DOSA

    2003: 95% DOSA (RMH) > 10,000 elective admissions

  • 8/6/2019 7th_DayPac

    4/42

    Background 2

    Day Case Surgery at Royal Melbourne: Feb. 03 - Jan. 04

    2,242 Day cases vs 7,083 Multiday cases

    Endoscopies: 2,767 as day cases

    5,009 Day cases of a total of 12,092 patients

    41 % Day Cases

  • 8/6/2019 7th_DayPac

    5/42

    Background 3

    Mid 90 - PACs everywhere Australia leading the world

    Love - hate relationship

    Poor guidelines by colleges

    Vast differences in organisation and

    philosophy

  • 8/6/2019 7th_DayPac

    6/42

    Objectives 1

    Identifying potential anaesthetic difficulties Identifying existing medical conditions

    Improving safety by quantifying risk

    Allowing planning of peri-operative care

    Explain and discuss

    Allaying fear and anxiety

  • 8/6/2019 7th_DayPac

    7/42

    Objectives 2

    Reduce costs Increase efficiency of operating time

    Increase patient comfort and satisfaction

    Reduce cancellations

    Reduce FTA

  • 8/6/2019 7th_DayPac

    8/42

    Classification of Physical Status

    AmericanSociety ofAnesthesiologists

    ASA

  • 8/6/2019 7th_DayPac

    9/42

    ASA 1

    Class I Normal healthy patient

    Class II Mild systemic disease

    Class III Severe systemic disease

    that limits activity, but is not

    incapacitating

  • 8/6/2019 7th_DayPac

    10/42

    ASA 2

    Class IV Severe incapacitating

    systemic disease with

    constant threat to life

    Class V Moribund Patient not

    expected to survive 24hours with or without

    surgery

  • 8/6/2019 7th_DayPac

    11/42

    Predictors of operative

    morbidity Age

    Pre-operative ASA status

    Type of surgery (minor vs. major)

    Emergency vs. elective

  • 8/6/2019 7th_DayPac

    12/42

    Day Case Eligibility

    Social

    medical

    facilities and procedures

  • 8/6/2019 7th_DayPac

    13/42

    Day Case Eligibility 2

    Medical Procedure

    Minimal bleeding

    Minimal pain and nausea

    Minimal post op airway compromise

    No special nursing requirements

    Rapid return to oral intake

  • 8/6/2019 7th_DayPac

    14/42

    Day Case Eligibility 3

    Medical cont. Patients should be fit or well controlled chronic

    disease

    BMI < 30 (35) Physiological status vs age

    Routine rules apply to pre-operative assessment

  • 8/6/2019 7th_DayPac

    15/42

    Day Case Eligibility:

    Ever growing list of procedures: eg: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

    Hernias

    VVs Orthopaedics

    Plastics

    Urology

    Eyes

  • 8/6/2019 7th_DayPac

    16/42

    Who should be seen Type of surgery (cataract vs. hemihepatectomy)

    Age (? Over 60/65/70)

    ASA III and IV

    Language Patient request

    Previous anaesthetic problems

    Social circumstances (country patients, elderlyetc)

    Repeat operations

    Possible airway problems

  • 8/6/2019 7th_DayPac

    17/42

    Who should assess

    Anaesthetist vs Liaison nurses

    RMH: 94% of all patients are seen by

    anaesthetist

    Patient questionnaire

    Nurse assessment guided by protocols

  • 8/6/2019 7th_DayPac

    18/42

    Organ systems

    CVS

    Respiratory

    Renal

    Hepatic

    Haematological

    Endocrine

  • 8/6/2019 7th_DayPac

    19/42

    CVS Risk Factors Hypertension

    Diabetes

    Family History

    Cholesterol

    Smoking

    Obesity

  • 8/6/2019 7th_DayPac

    20/42

    Guidelines for Perioperative

    Cardiovascular Evaluationfor Noncardiac Surgery

    ACC/AHA Task Force

    JACC 1996; 27:910-945Circulation 1996; 93:1278-1317

  • 8/6/2019 7th_DayPac

    21/42

    Cardiac risk stratification for Noncardiac

    Surgical ProceduresHigh (Reported cardiac risk often

    >5% )

    Emergent major operations,particularly in the elderly

    Aortic and other major vascular

    Peripheral vascular

    Anticipated prolonged surgicalprocedures associated with large

    fluid shifts and / or blood loss

    Intermediate (risk generally

  • 8/6/2019 7th_DayPac

    22/42

    Clinical Predictors of Increased

    Perioperative Cardiovascular Risk (MI,

    CHF, Death)Major

    Unstable coronary syndromes

    Recent MI ( >7 days but 30 days) with evidence of important ischemicrisk by clinical symptoms or noninvasive study

    Unstable or severe angina (Canadian Cardiovascular Society Class III

    or IV). May include stable angina in patients who are unusually

    sedentary. Decompensated congestive heart failure

    Significant arrhythmia

    High-grade atrioventricular block

    Symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias in the presence of underlying

    heart disease

    Supraventricular arrhythmias with uncontrolled ventricular rate

    Severe valvular disease

    ACC/AHA Task Force

    JACC 1996; 27:910-945; Circulation 1996; 93:1278-1317

    Clinical Predictors of Increased

  • 8/6/2019 7th_DayPac

    23/42

    Clinical Predictors of Increased

    Perioperative Cardiovascular Risk (MI,

    CHF, Death)Intermediate

    Mild angina pectoris (Canadian Cardiovascular Society Class I or II)

    Prior myocardial infarction by history or pathological waves Compensated or prior congestive heart failure

    Diabetes mellitus

    Minor

    Advanced age Abnormal electrocardiogram (LVH, LBBB, ST-T abnormalities)

    Rhythm other than sinus(eg. atrial fibrillation)

    Low functional capacity (eg. Unable to climb one flight of stairs with a bag of

    groceries)

    History of stroke

    Uncontrolled systemic hypertension

    ACC/AHA Task Force

    JACC 1996; 27:910-945; Circulation 1996; 93:1278-1317

  • 8/6/2019 7th_DayPac

    24/42

    Estimated Energy Requirements

    for Various Activities

    1 MET Can you take care of yourself?

    Eat, dress, or use the toilet?

    Walk indoors around thehouse?

    Walk a block or two on level

    ground at 2-3 mph or 3.2-4.8

    km/h?

    4 METs Do light work around the houselike dusting or washing

    clothes?

    MET = metabolic equivalent

    4 METs Climb a flight of stairs or walk up

    a hill?Walk on level ground at 4 mph or6.4 km/h?

    Run a short distance?

    Do heavy work around the houselike scrubbing floors or lifting or

    moving heavy objects?Participate in moderaterecreational activities like golf,bowling, dancing, doubles tennis,or throwing a baseball orfootball?

    10 METs Participate in strenuous sportslike swimming, singles tennis,

    football, baseball, or skiing?

  • 8/6/2019 7th_DayPac

    25/42

    Stepwise Approach to Preoperative Cardiac

    Assessment2. Coronary

    revascularization

    within 5 years ?

    Recurrent

    symptoms

    or signs ?

    Urgent or

    Elective

    Yes

    Yes

    No1. Need for

    noncardiac

    surgery

    3. Recent

    coronary

    evaluation

    No

    Recent coronary

    angiogram or

    stress test ?

    Postoperative risk

    stratification and risk

    factor management

    Operating

    Room

    4. Clinical

    predictorsEmergency Yes

    No

    Favorable AND no

    change in symptoms

    Unfavorable

    OR change in

    symptoms

    ACC/AHA Task Force

    JACC 1996; 27:910-945; Circulation 1996; 93:1278-1317

  • 8/6/2019 7th_DayPac

    26/42

    Stepwise Approach to Preoperative Cardiac

    Assessment4. Clinical

    predictors

    6. Intermediate

    clinical

    predictor

    7. Minor or no

    clinical

    predictor

    5. Major

    clinical

    predictor

    Advanced age

    Abnormal ECG

    Rhythm other than sinus

    Low functional capacity

    History of stroke

    Uncontrolled systemic

    hypertension

    Mild angina pectoris

    Prior myocardial

    infarction

    Compensated or prior

    CHF

    Diabetes mellitus

    Unstable coronary

    syndromes

    Decompensated congestive

    heart failure

    Significant arrhythmia

    Severe valvular disease

    ACC/AHA Task Force

    JACC 1996; 27:910-945; Circulation 1996; 93:1278-1317

  • 8/6/2019 7th_DayPac

    27/42

    Stepwise Approach to Preoperative Cardiac

    Assessment

    5. Major

    clinical

    predictor

    Major Clinical Predictor

    Unstable coronary

    syndromes

    Decompensated congestive

    heart failureSignificant arrhythmia

    Severe valvular disease

    ACC/AHA Task ForceJACC 1996; 27:910-945; Circulation 1996; 93:1278-1317

    Consider delay

    or cancel

    noncardiac surgery

    Consider

    coronary

    angiography

    Medical

    management and

    risk factormodification

    Subsequent care

    dictated by

    findings andtreatment results

  • 8/6/2019 7th_DayPac

    28/42

    Stepwise Approach to Preoperative Cardiac

    AssessmentFunctionalcapacity

    Surgical

    risk

    Noninvasive

    testing

    Invasive

    testing

    6. Intermediate

    clinical

    predictor

    Moderate or

    excellent

    (>4 METs)

    Intermediate

    or low surgical

    risk procedure

    High surgical

    risk procedure

    Low surgical

    risk procedure

    8. Noninvasive

    testing

    Postoperative

    risk stratification

    and risk factor

    reduction

    Low risk

    High risk

    Poor

    (

  • 8/6/2019 7th_DayPac

    29/42

    Stepwise Approach to Preoperative Cardiac

    AssessmentFunctionalcapacity

    Surgical

    risk

    Noninvasive

    testing

    Invasive

    testing

    Poor

    (4 METs)

    Intermediate

    or low surgicalrisk procedure

    High surgical

    risk procedure

    Low surgical

    risk procedure

    8. Noninvasive

    testing

    Postoperative

    risk stratification

    and risk factor

    reduction

    Low risk

    High risk

    7. Minor or no

    clinical

    predictor

    Consider

    coronary

    angiography

    Operating

    room

    Subsequent

    care dictated

    by findings and

    treatment results

    ACC/AHA Task ForceJACC 1996; 27:910-945; Circulation 1996; 93:1278-1317

  • 8/6/2019 7th_DayPac

    30/42

    Respiratory 1 Guidelines not as clear

    Poor respiratory function increases the

    risk of perioperative complications

    Respiratory function can often be

    optimised

    Asthma much better controlled today

  • 8/6/2019 7th_DayPac

    31/42

    Respiratory 2 Often determines anaesthetic technique

    GA vs. regional

    Epidural for pain relief

  • 8/6/2019 7th_DayPac

    32/42

    Respiratory 3 History of asthma/COAD/Malignancy

    Exercise tolerance Can you climb 2 flights of stairs?

    Drug history Inhalers, nebuliser, steroids

  • 8/6/2019 7th_DayPac

    33/42

    Respiratory 4 Hospital admissions

    Frequent infections

    Previous operations

  • 8/6/2019 7th_DayPac

    34/42

    Respiratory 5 CXR

    Respiratory Function Tests

    Arterial Blood Gases

    Exercise Testing

    Occlusive Vascular Tests

  • 8/6/2019 7th_DayPac

    35/42

    Respiratory 6

    Referral to Physician

    Optimisation of condition

    Steroids

    Reschedule

  • 8/6/2019 7th_DayPac

    36/42

    Diabetes History (Type, how long)

    Treatment

    How well controlled

    Complications (IHD, PVD, Neuropathies,

    Renal Impairment,

    retinopathy)

  • 8/6/2019 7th_DayPac

    37/42

    Renal History

    Medication

    Severity

    Dialysis

    Crea / Urea

    Complications (Hypertension, Anaemia

    IHD, fluid overload)

  • 8/6/2019 7th_DayPac

    38/42

    Hepatic History

    Infection / alcohol / drug abuse

    LFT / coagulation

    Complications (generally poor conditions,

    CVS, RS)

  • 8/6/2019 7th_DayPac

    39/42

    Conclusion Preadmission clinics are here to stay

    Essential for economy and patient safety

    Systematic approach to patient assessment

    Patient assessment in context of surgery Protocols for common situations

    Specialised nurses will take lead role in patientsassessment and triage

  • 8/6/2019 7th_DayPac

    40/42

    Conclusion Team approach needed in assessment

    and preparation of the sick patient

  • 8/6/2019 7th_DayPac

    41/42

    Any Questions?

  • 8/6/2019 7th_DayPac

    42/42