A Study of Pedestrian Behaviour

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/8/2019 A Study of Pedestrian Behaviour

    1/21

    Warnings and Behavior: A StudyWarnings and Behavior: A Studyof Pedestrian Behavior at Gradeof Pedestrian Behavior at Grade

    CrossingsCrossings

    Gavin HuntleyGavin Huntley--Fenner, Ph.D.Fenner, Ph.D.

    Managing ScientistManaging Scientist

    Exponent, Inc.Exponent, Inc.May, 2008May, 2008

  • 8/8/2019 A Study of Pedestrian Behaviour

    2/21

    OutlineOutline

    Introduction

    Case Study

    Implications

  • 8/8/2019 A Study of Pedestrian Behaviour

    3/21

    1996 FRA data 2004 FRA data

    Basic grade crossing taxonomy isBasic grade crossing taxonomy isevolvingevolving

  • 8/8/2019 A Study of Pedestrian Behaviour

    4/21

    6.3%

    55.7%

    38.0%

    % of public grade crossings

    2004 FRA data

    Current distribution of activeCurrent distribution of activedevices at public crossingsdevices at public crossings

  • 8/8/2019 A Study of Pedestrian Behaviour

    5/21

    Decrease in highway rail incidentsDecrease in highway rail incidentsis a familiar story (e.g., fatalities)is a familiar story (e.g., fatalities)

  • 8/8/2019 A Study of Pedestrian Behaviour

    6/21

    CounterCounter--trend: Pedestrian incidentstrend: Pedestrian incidentshave increased markedlyhave increased markedly

    Pedestrian incidentshave increased by20%

    Constitute between10% and 20% of allincidents

    In the same time frameMV incidents fell

    by about 6%

  • 8/8/2019 A Study of Pedestrian Behaviour

    7/21

    Pattern of pedestrian incidents isPattern of pedestrian incidents iscounter intuitivecounter intuitive

    Similar numbers ofmotor vehicleincidents at gates &crossbucks

    10x more pedestrianincidents with gatedcrossings than with

    crossbucks

    905

    10

    865

    123

    1

    10

    100

    1000

    MotorVehicles

    Pedestrians

    #o

    fincidents

    Crossbucks onlyGates

    2005 FRA data; Y axis is in log scale PUBLIC & PRIVATE crossings combined

    Federal Railroad Administration. (December 2006). Railroad Safety Statistics 2005 Final Report . U.S. Department of Transportation. Washington, D.C.

  • 8/8/2019 A Study of Pedestrian Behaviour

    8/21

    Pedestrian specific factors arePedestrian specific factors are

    acknowledged as importantacknowledged as important

    Railroads often act as physical dividersbetween important, interrelated elements ofcommunities.

    Railroads have always attracted juvenilesas play areas

    passengers frequently use short cutsbefore or after boarding a train.

    some people are prone to vandalism .

    Source: 2007 Railroad Grade Crossing Handbook Revised Second Edition

  • 8/8/2019 A Study of Pedestrian Behaviour

    9/21

    but historically the approach tobut historically the approach toinfluencing behavior is similarinfluencing behavior is similar

  • 8/8/2019 A Study of Pedestrian Behaviour

    10/21

    Motorists and pedestrians haveMotorists and pedestrians havedifferent mindsetsdifferent mindsets

    Pedestrians interpretsigns and signals atcrossings differently

    Pedestrians have minimalthreat of law enforcement

    Pedestrians may trespass easy to travel offroadway

    Many pedestrians have asense of control over theright-of-way

  • 8/8/2019 A Study of Pedestrian Behaviour

    11/21

    and multiple interpretations ofand multiple interpretations ofsignals are possiblesignals are possible

    State Drivers Manual

    Red light?

    Stop sign?

    Bells or other audible warning devices

    may be included to provide

    additional warning for pedestrians and

    bicyclists

    MUTCD 8D.01

    FHWA Railroad Grade

    Crossing Handbook

  • 8/8/2019 A Study of Pedestrian Behaviour

    12/21

    Some interpretations may be at oddsSome interpretations may be at odds

    Stimulus

    Information useful inguiding behavior toward anoptimal desired outcome

    Two interpretations

    Information about a possiblenegative consequence amessage that somethingundesirable may occur

    Train approaching donot enter crossing

    Train approachingsoon get into boardingposition on platform

    Lights flashingAlarm sounding

    Warning

    Signal

    Behavior

  • 8/8/2019 A Study of Pedestrian Behaviour

    13/21

    Case Study: Evidence forCase Study: Evidence for signalsignalinterpretation of active warningsinterpretation of active warnings

    Location Method Data

    Suburban commuterrail station in the US

    Surveillance was covert

    3 days of recording

    between 7am and 9am

    Directly at crosswalk

    Recorded data only

    while bell sounded &lights flashed

    # of trains

    # of people crossing

    Timing of crossing

    Manner of crossing

  • 8/8/2019 A Study of Pedestrian Behaviour

    14/21

    Schematic layout of the stationSchematic layout of the station

    Camera

  • 8/8/2019 A Study of Pedestrian Behaviour

    15/21

    Northbound viewNorthbound view

    Overpass:

    3481

    Trestle:

    5730

    D

  • 8/8/2019 A Study of Pedestrian Behaviour

    16/21

    Data summaryData summary

    Train Day 1 Day 2 Day 3

    07:30 NB Local ; SB Express - - 4

    07:40 NB Local ; 7:43 SB Local - 6 6

    07:52 SB Express - - -

    07:58 NB Local ; 8:01 SB Local 5 9 708:10 SB Express 2 - -

    08:17 NB Local 5 3 2

    08:22 SB Local - - -

    08:40 SB Local 1 2 -

    87% crossed while bellsounded- 8 people crossed pre-train, 2 of them ran

    13% waited until bellstopped and train left

    station

    60 pedestrians in crosswalk 28 female and 32 male

  • 8/8/2019 A Study of Pedestrian Behaviour

    17/21

    Summary of case study resultsSummary of case study results

    Pedestrians were willing to enter crosswalkseven while bells are sounding

    Some crossed just before the train arrived

    Most crossed after a train had left the station

    A few pedestrians waited for the bells to stopeven after the train had departed

  • 8/8/2019 A Study of Pedestrian Behaviour

    18/21

    Results of the study echo findings ofResults of the study echo findings ofFRA panelFRA panel

    Observations of pedestrianObservations of pedestrianbehavior often reveal that manybehavior often reveal that manypedestrians do not think ofpedestrians do not think ofthemselves as part of the overallthemselves as part of the overalltraffic stream, and therefore nottraffic stream, and therefore not

    really subject to traffic controlreally subject to traffic controldevices ...devices ...

    effective devices are aeffective devices are anecessary complement to lawnecessary complement to lawenforcement initiatives and publicenforcement initiatives and publicoutreach and education efforts inoutreach and education efforts inthe enhancement of pedestrianthe enhancement of pedestriansafety at grade crossings.safety at grade crossings.

  • 8/8/2019 A Study of Pedestrian Behaviour

    19/21

    ImplicationsImplications

    Auditory alarms warn AND reduce

    uncertainty

    Pedestrians use the safety informationprovided together with other information

    about when/whether to cross- Perceptual factors (looming, monocularparallax )

    - Timing of alarm bell- Physical layout- Visual Signs?-

    Threat of enforcement?

  • 8/8/2019 A Study of Pedestrian Behaviour

    20/21

    Rules differ but behavior is similarRules differ but behavior is similar

    Rule

    Some

    considerationsguiding behavior

    What manner ofcrossing ispossible?

    Is hazard

    present?

    How fast can Itravel?

    When can Ibegin to cross?

    Enter crosswalkonly on walk signal

    Do not enter if dontwalk is flashing orsolidly lit

    Do not enter

    crossing while gateis down

    When lights areflashing stop before

    proceeding intointersection

    Right of Way

    Drivers always yieldto pedestrians

    Trains yield for

    no one

  • 8/8/2019 A Study of Pedestrian Behaviour

    21/21