Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges 2010 Report: Moreno Valley College Calculation

Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges

2010 Report: Moreno Valley College Calculation

presented byDavid Torres, Dean

Institutional ResearchNovember 2, 2010

Background Accountability Reporting for the

Community Colleges (or ARCC) is a set of performance indicators for the California Community Colleges (CCC)

The final report was published in Spring 2010

Two level of analysis: system wide performance individual college performance

student progress and achievementpre-collegiate improvement

Caveat Slide Official ARCC data is for RCCD, not

MVC

Present data was extrapolated at RCCD Institutional Research office

Official college-level indicators may be available in 2012

Why will it take so long?ARCC MVC

Report Year 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

2010 S E

2010 S E

2010 S E

2011 S E

2011 S E

2011 S E

2012 S E

2012 S E

2012 S E

2013 S E

2013 S E

2013 S E

2014 S E

2014 S E

2014 S E

2015 S E

2015 S E

2015 S E

2016 S E

2016 S E

2016 S E

2017 S E

2017 S E

2017 S E

2018 S E

2018 ` S E

2018 S E

2019 S E

2019 S E

2019 S E

Moreno Valley College: College Level Indicators:Student Progress and Achievement Rate

Percentage of first-time students who showed intent to complete and within six years:

• transferred to a four-year college

• earned an AA/AS

• earned a Certificate (18 units or more)

• achieved "Transfer Directed" status

• achieved "Transfer Prepared”

Moreno Valley College: College Level Indicators:Transfer

“Intent To Complete” = attempted degree applicable credit math / English course.

1999 2000 2001 2002 20030%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

MOV RCCD

Moreno Valley College: College Level Indicators:Awarded AA /AS


1999 2000 2001 2002 20030%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

MOV RCCD

Moreno Valley College: College Level Indicators:Became “Transfer Directed”


“Transfer Directed” means a student successfully completed at least one transfer-level Math and English course.

1999 2000 2001 2002 20030%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

MOV RCCD

Moreno Valley College: College Level Indicators:Became “Transfer Prepared”


“Transfer Prepared” means student successfully completed 60 UC/CSU transferable units with a grade point average of at least 2.0 in those transferable courses.

1999 2000 2001 2002 20030%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

MOV RCCD

Moreno Valley College: College Level Indicators:Earned Certificate (18+ units)

“Intent To Complete” = attempted Advanced Occupational / Apprentice level Credit course.

1999 2000 2001 2002 20030%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

MOV RCCD

Moreno Valley College: College Level Indicators:

Percent of Students Who Earned at Least 30 Units

Percentage of first-time students with intent to complete and within six years:

• earned at least 30 units • while in the California Community College System

1999 2000 2001 2002 20030%

25%

50%

75%

RCCD MOV


Term to Term Persistence Rate

Percentage of first-time students with:

• a minimum of six units earned in a Fall term, and

• returned and enrolled in the subsequent Fall term

• anywhere in the system.

2005 2006 200720%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

MOV RCCD


Annual Successful Course Completion Rate for Credit Vocational Courses

Percentage of student enrollments:• in credit-based classes and • courses coded as “Clearly Occupational” or

higher• where students earned an A, B, C or CR grade

2006-07 2007-08 2008-090%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

RCCD MOV


Annual Successful Course Completion Rate for Credit Basic Skills Courses

Percentage of student enrollments:• in credit-based classes and • courses coded as “Basic Skills”• where students earned an A, B, C or CR grade

2006 2007 20080%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

RCCD MOV


Improvement Rates for ESL Courses

Percentage of students who:• successfully completed the initial basic skills course

and • successfully completed a higher-level course in the

same discipline • within three academic years

2004-05 Cohort 2005-06 Cohort 2006-07 Cohort

-10%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

RCCD MOV

ESL Explanation: Background

ESL Improvement has been the only inconsistent ARCC indicator

Only ESL enrollments that are two or more levels below college or transfer are included

Includes ESL 51, 52, any from the 70 through 99 only

ESL-54 and ESL-55 are college level and ESL-53 is only one level below, so they are not examined.

ESL Explanation: ESL Courses and Prior to College Levels, fall 2008

Prior To College Level Course Code Course TitleA (1 Level Below) ESL-53 Intermed Writing/GrammarB (2 Levels Below) ESL-52 Low-Intermed Writing/GrammarC (3 Levels Below) ESL-51 Basic Writing and Grammar

ESL-65 Amer Classroom CultureESL-71 Basic Reading/VocabESL-72 Intermed Reading/VocabularyESL-73 High-Intermed Reading/Vocab

ESL-90D Verb Tense ReviewESL-90G Articles: A, An, TheESL-90H Phrases and ClausesESL-90J Spelling ReviewESL-91 Oral Skills: Beginning Oral CommunicatioESL-92 Oral Skills: Intemed Oral CommunicationESL-93 Oral Skill: Advanced Oral CommunicationESL-95 Pronunciation, Accent ReductionESL-96 Writ/Read Ctr PracticumESL-97 Writ/Read Center Practicum

Not Eligible ESL-54 High-Intermed Writing/Grammar(College Level) ESL-55 Advanced Writing/Grammar

Y (More than 3 Levels Below)

ESL Explanation: ESL Courses and Inclusion in ARCC

If student is successful in...

and subsequently successful in…

is student included in the ARCC?

Is the student counted as

improved in the ARCC?

Reason

ESL-51 ESL-52 Yes Yes Moved from Level C to B

ESL-52 ESL-53 Yes Yes Moved from Level B to A

ESL-53 ESL-54 No No Not eligible, ESL-54 is only one level below college

ESL-71 ESL-72 Yes No Both course levels are "Y"



ANY ESL 7X ESL-51 Yes Yes Moved from Level Y to C

ANY ESL 9X ESL-51 Yes Yes Moved from Level Y to C

ESL Explanation: Pathways through ESL

No clear pathway for ESL Courses 70-99 No prerequisites to clearly indicate a

sequence

ESL 51, 52, and 53 constitute a clear sequence Prerequisites indicate the sequence

When ESL 70-99 are excluded, the Improvement Rates for clear pathway courses stabilizes

ESL Explanation: Revised ESL Improvement Rates

AY Courses Total Count Improved Percent

2003-04 ESL-51 / 52 217 107 49.3%ESL 70-99 367 198 54.0%

2003-04 Total 584 305 52.2%

2004-05 ESL-51 / 52 233 113 48.5%ESL 70-99 242 117 48.3%

2004-05 Total 475 230 48.4%

2005-06 ESL-51 / 52 193 95 49.2%ESL 70-99 285 173 60.7%

2005-06 Total 478 268 56.1%

The overall ARCC ESL Improvement Rates are influenced by the ESL 70-99

Improvement Rate.

Change the course coding of ESL 70 – 99

Conduct independent review every year to confirm the nature of any fluctuations Dependent on the cooperation of the

California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office

ESL Explanation: Implications


Improvement Rates for Credit Basic Skills Courses

Percentage of students who:• successfully completed the initial basic skills course

and • successfully completed a higher-level course in the

same discipline • within three academic years

2004-05 Cohort 2005-06 Cohort 2006-07 Cohort0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

RCCD MOV

Determine which indicators need improvement

Understand how the indicators are defined

Develop targeted treatments that are hypothesized to positively affect these indicators

Suggestions for moving forward…

End of slide show

Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges,

2010 Report: Moreno Valley College Calculation

David Torres, Dean, Institutional Research

[email protected]

951-222-8075

Documents

Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges 2010 Report: Moreno Valley College Calculation