Upload
feoras
View
33
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
How Has and Is the (Video) Network Traffic Changing?. ACE/RUS School and Symposium Corralling the Broadband Stampede. Presented By. Tom Lewis, PE Vice President - Engineering. Video Traffic Trends. Are you in the video business? You are if 2/3rds of your Internet traffic is video - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
ACE/RUS School and SymposiumCorralling the Broadband Stampede
How Has and Is the (Video) Network Traffic Changing?
Tom Lewis, PEVice President - Engineering
Presented By
Video Traffic Trends Are you in the video business? You are if 2/3rds of your Internet traffic is video Current and projected requirements for:
Managed IPTV (traditional Telco TV)
Unmanaged Internet Video
Planning for future, corralling the video stampede Capacity planning, impact on flat-rate Internet model
Managed IPTV Multicast SD and HD Historic Bandwidth requirements:
Backbone transport from Headend: 1Gbps or 2.5Gbps in past was adequate for avg SD/HD lineup
Access ~ 25Mbps minimum (2HD + SD + Internet)
Increased HD viewing primarily impacts Access To compete with satellite, need to be able to deliver 6
simultaneous HD channels = 48 Mbps + Internet
This requires VDSL2 or FTTP
Channel Lineup Multicast Bandwidth
How is IPTV traffic changing? New IPTV services require a significant amount of
bandwidth for unicast traffic such as: Video on Demand (VOD) Timeshifted Viewing (Network DVR for select channels) Microsoft Mediaroom Instant Channel Change (ICC)
Unicast Impact on Network Transport backbone: need 10GE Last Mile Access: Slight increase for ICC Distribution rings: How many subscribers can be served via a
single GE feed?
Estimated Traffic in a Mediaroom Network for 500 Homes
• This Conservative Model assumes the following– 500 Households– 70% of Households
watching TV– 10% of viewers
watching VOD– 5% of viewers watching
timeshifted content– 3% of viewers in fast
channel change
329 Mb/s
270 Mb/s
67 Mb/s
110 Mb/s
Total Traffic = 776 Mbps
Unicast
In a modern IPTV Network unicast video bandwidth usage can quickly outpace traditional multicast usage
Bandwidth Usage Versus Subscriber Counts
Internet Streaming Video We all know Internet Video traffic is exponentially
increasing, but the rate of change is difficult to grasp. Where does it end? Good Sources for Internet Video traffic statistics
Cisco Visual Networking Index
Calix U.S. Rural Broadband Q4 2011 Report
Internet Video Today Calix report findings for Q4 2011:
Video streaming accounted for 67% of downstream traffic, and providers with 100% FTTP saw 78%• Netflix is by far largest component, at least 2/3 of all video
For comparison, browsing accounted for 19% downstream P2P was only 1% 5% of users accounted for more than 50% of Internet traffic Fiber subs generate 2.67 times more traffic than DSL subs Average monthly download was 12 GB. Fiber average was 28.6 GB
per month.• Calix findings are consistent with N-Com’s recent analysis of
client’s traffic.
Sample Daily Aggregate Report from April 2012
10
Sample Internet Traffic Report Peak Usage around 9 PM. Peak usage is twice the average throughput.
Cisco 2011 VNI Report Busy Hour Internet traffic will grow 5-fold by 2015 vs
avg traffic growing 4-fold Peak traffic is 2.5 times the average throughput Globally streaming video accounts for 50% of
consumer Internet bandwidth, growing to 62% by 2015
Internet video to TV will continue to grow at a rapid pace, increasing 17-fold by 2015. Internet video to TV will be over 16 percent of consumer Internet video traffic in 2015, up from 7 percent in 2010.
Projecting Internet Video Growth
So where are we at on this roller coaster?
What percentage of subscribers are consuming Internet Video today?
From Calix report, 11% of subs generate 64% of traffic, more than 50GB monthly
Netflix movie ~ 2.5GB
Source: Calix
OTT Video Projection We are still very early in the OTT adoption curve If other 89% adopt OTT viewing pattern of today’s top 11%,
would result in approximately 6 times today’s traffic. In our analysis of client’s traffic, the average Netflix stream per
session is less than 1 Mbps. As more viewing takes place on TVs and/or subscribers upgrade broadband speeds, this will transition to the Netflix “best’ rate of around 2.2Mbps for non-HD content. So another growth factor of approximately 2 times.
So as a guestimate, OTT traffic could increase by 6 x 2 = 12 times over coming years. 12 x todays monthly average of 12GB gives a possible future average of 144 GB monthly.
But wait, there’s more…. OTT is just the initial phase. Over coming years the entire
video industry will transition from today’s CATV linear model to on-demand, “cloud TV”
According to Nielson, average individual American watches almost 5 hours of traditional TV every day, compared to 30 minutes of Internet video
Assume average home views 1.5 x 5 = 7.5 hours per day In future, a cloud TV home could require 7.5 x 30 = 225
hours/month x 2.3 GB/hr for HD = 517.5 GB/mo
And so we have Caps Comcast, AT&T Uverse, CenturyLink and Suddenlink are all examples of
providers that have implemented 250 GB monthly caps.
From the Comcast website: To put this usage in perspective, 250 GB is the equivalent of:
downloading 62,500 songs (173 days worth of music);
uploading more than 25,000 high-resolution photos; or
streaming between about 100 to 800 hours of video (the range depends upon whether you're streaming studio-quality video or good-quality, standard-definition video, which have different bit rates depending upon the provider).
Caps from non-landline broadband providers: Wildblue Exede plans max out at 25 GB
Verizon HomeFusion Fixed LTE service top plan is 30 GB – 24 hours of Netflix binge viewing
Possible Industry Initiatives Traffic growth must be linked to revenue growth Possible Measures or Mitigation Methods
Caps
1-800 model: content providers pay service provider to be cap-free
Subscriber usage based plans ($/MB)
Caching, or bring CDN provider into your network
Observations Key in sizing Internet uplinks is now the “primetime” 7
to 10 PM video viewing period. Maybe caps should only apply to downloads during these times?
In planning any network upgrades, have evolution path to ultimate future “cloud TV” bandwidth requirements. This needs to be considered in deciding between 1GE vs 10GE, 10GE vs WDM, etc.
OTT/Cloud TV impacts backhaul requirements, not Access network speeds. E.g., 200 subscribers each using 5 Mbps for video exhaust a single GE feed.
Conclusions We all watch way too much TV. Netflix growth rate
and Mayan prophecy connection? Begin routine monitoring of your Internet traffic
usage, track growth trends Have plans for gaining access to most economical
Internet uplink providers that can support growth Evaluate subscriber package modifications