54
Agricultural Prices ISSN: 1937-4216 Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). September Farm Prices Received Index Declines 1 Point The preliminary All Farm Products Index of Prices Received by Farmers in September, at 183 percent, based on 1990-1992=100, decreased 1 point (0.5 percent) from August. The Crop Index is unchanged but the Livestock Index decreased 7 points (4.4 percent). Producers received higher prices for cattle, strawberries, hay, and grain sorghum and lower prices for broilers, hogs, milk, and corn. In addition to prices, the overall index is also affected by the seasonal change based on a 3-year average mix of commodities producers sell. Increased monthly marketings of corn, soybeans, apples, and potatoes offset decreased marketings of cattle, wheat, broilers, and grapes. The preliminary All Farm Products Index is up 40 points (28 percent) from September 2010. The Food Commodities Index, at 169, decreased 4 points (2.3 percent) from last month but increased 28 points (20 percent) from September 2010. Prices Paid Index Unchanged The September Index of Prices Paid for Commodities and Services, Interest, Taxes, and Farm Wage Rates (PPITW) is 205 percent of the 1990-1992 average. The index is unchanged from August but 22 points above (12 percent) September 2010. Higher prices in September for complete feeds, supplements, LP gas, and potash & phosphate offset lower prices for concentrates, feeder cattle, feed grains, and feeder pigs. Prices Received, Prices Paid, and Ratio of Prices Received to Prices Paid Indexes 1990-1992 Base – United States: September 2011 with Comparisons Index September 2010 August 2011 September 2011 Prices received by farmers ......................................................................... Prices paid by farmers ................................................................................ Ratio of prices received to prices paid ........................................................ 143 183 78 184 205 90 183 205 89

Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

Agricultural Prices

ISSN: 1937-4216

Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). September Farm Prices Received Index Declines 1 Point The preliminary All Farm Products Index of Prices Received by Farmers in September, at 183 percent, based on 1990-1992=100, decreased 1 point (0.5 percent) from August. The Crop Index is unchanged but the Livestock Index decreased 7 points (4.4 percent). Producers received higher prices for cattle, strawberries, hay, and grain sorghum and lower prices for broilers, hogs, milk, and corn. In addition to prices, the overall index is also affected by the seasonal change based on a 3-year average mix of commodities producers sell. Increased monthly marketings of corn, soybeans, apples, and potatoes offset decreased marketings of cattle, wheat, broilers, and grapes. The preliminary All Farm Products Index is up 40 points (28 percent) from September 2010. The Food Commodities Index, at 169, decreased 4 points (2.3 percent) from last month but increased 28 points (20 percent) from September 2010. Prices Paid Index Unchanged The September Index of Prices Paid for Commodities and Services, Interest, Taxes, and Farm Wage Rates (PPITW) is 205 percent of the 1990-1992 average. The index is unchanged from August but 22 points above (12 percent) September 2010. Higher prices in September for complete feeds, supplements, LP gas, and potash & phosphate offset lower prices for concentrates, feeder cattle, feed grains, and feeder pigs. Prices Received, Prices Paid, and Ratio of Prices Received to Prices Paid Indexes 1990-1992 Base – United States: September 2011 with Comparisons

Index September 2010

August 2011

September 2011

Prices received by farmers ......................................................................... Prices paid by farmers ................................................................................ Ratio of prices received to prices paid ........................................................

143

183

78

184

205

90

183

205

89

Page 2: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

2 Agricultural Prices (September 2011) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Contents Prices Received by Farmers .................................................................................................................................................... 4 Prices Received Indexes – United States: September 2011 with Comparisons ...................................................................... 5 Prices Received and Prices Paid Indexes by Month for Selected Groups – United States: 2010 and 2011, 1990-1992 Base ................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Received Indexes by Month, Livestock Products, All Products, and All Crops – United States: 1990-1992=100 Chart................................................................................................................................... 6 Received Indexes by Month, Food Grains, Feed Grains & Hay, and Oilseeds – United States: 1990-1992=100 Chart................................................................................................................................... 6 Received Indexes by Month, Fruit & Nut and Commercial Vegetables – United States: 1990-1992=100 Chart................................................................................................................................... 7 Received Indexes by Month, Meat Animal, Dairy Products, and Poultry & Eggs – United States: 1990-1992=100 Chart................................................................................................................................... 7 Prices Received for Field Crops and Fruits – United States: September 2011 with Comparisons ......................................... 8 Prices Received for Vegetables and Livestock – United States: September 2011 with Comparisons .................................... 9 Prices Received for Corn by Month – United States Chart ................................................................................................... 10 Prices Received for Wheat by Month – United States Chart ................................................................................................ 10 Prices Received for Cotton by Month – United States Chart ................................................................................................ 11 Prices Received for Soybeans by Month – United States Chart ........................................................................................... 11 Prices Received for Cattle by Month – United States Chart ................................................................................................. 12 Prices Received for Milk by Month – United States Chart ................................................................................................... 12 Prices Received for Hogs by Month – United States Chart .................................................................................................. 13 Prices Received for Poultry by Month – United States Chart ............................................................................................... 13 Prices Received for All Wheat, Corn, and Soybeans by Month – United States: 2011 with Comparisons .......................... 14 Prices Received for Beef Cattle and All Hogs by Month – United States: 2011 with Comparisons .................................... 14 Prices Received for All Wheat – States and United States: September 2011 with Comparisons ......................................... 15 Prices Received for Winter Wheat – States and United States: September 2011 with Comparisons ................................... 15 Prices Received for Durum Wheat – States and United States: September 2011 with Comparisons ................................... 16 Prices Received for Spring Wheat – States and United States: September 2011 with Comparisons .................................... 16 Prices Received for All Barley – States and United States: September 2011 with Comparisons ......................................... 17 Prices Received for Malting Barley – States: September 2011 with Comparisons ............................................................... 17 Prices Received for Feed Barley – States: September 2011 with Comparisons ................................................................... 17 Prices Received for Corn – States and United States: September 2011 with Comparisons .................................................. 18 Prices Received for Soybeans – States and United States: September 2011 with Comparisons .......................................... 18 Prices Received for Oats – States and United States: September 2011 with Comparisons .................................................. 19 Prices Received for Sorghum Grain – States and United States: September 2011 with Comparisons ................................. 19 Prices Received for Dry Beans – States and United States: September 2011 with Comparisons ......................................... 20 Prices Received for Peanuts (In-Shell) – States and United States: September 2011 with Comparisons ............................. 20 Prices Received for Sunflower – States and United States: September 2011 with Comparisons ......................................... 21 Prices Received for Canola – States and United States: September 2011 with Comparisons .............................................. 21 Prices Received for Flaxseed – States and United States: September 2011 with Comparisons............................................ 21 Prices Received for Upland Cotton and Cottonseed – States and United States: September 2011 with Comparisons .............................................................................................................................................................. 22 Prices Received and Farm Marketings for Upland Cotton and Rice – United States: September 2011 with Comparisons .............................................................................................................................................................. 22 Prices Received for Hay by Type – States and United States: September 2011 with Comparisons ..................................... 23 Prices Received for Apples – States and United States: September 2011 with Comparisons .............................................. 23 Prices Received for Citrus Fruits by Utilization – States and United States: September 2010 ............................................. 24 Prices Received for Citrus Fruits by Utilization – States and United States: August 2011 .................................................. 25 Prices Received for Citrus Fruits by Utilization – States and United States: September 2011 ............................................. 26 Prices Received for Potatoes – States and United States: September 2011 with Comparisons ............................................ 27 Prices Received for All Milk – States and United States: September 2011 with Comparisons ............................................ 28 Prices Received for Milk Cows – States and United States: July 2011 with Comparisons .................................................. 29

Page 3: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

Agricultural Prices (September 2011) 3 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Commodity Parity Prices and Price as Percent of Parity Price – United States: September 2011 with Comparisons .............................................................................................................................................................. 30 Commodity Parity Prices – United States: September 2011 with Comparisons ................................................................... 31 Marketing Year for Specified Commodities ......................................................................................................................... 33 Dry Edible Peas Market Year Average Prices Received – States and United States: Marketing Years 2008 through 2010 ...................................................................................................................................................................... 34 Austrian Winter Peas Market Year Average Prices Received – States and United States: Marketing Years 2008 through 2010 ...................................................................................................................................................................... 34 Lentils Market Year Average Prices Received – States and United States: Marketing Years 2008 through 2010 .............. 34 Prices Received and Farm Marketings for Lentils by Month – United States: Marketing Years 2008-2009 through 2010-2011 ............................................................................................................................................................ 35 Prices Received and Farm Marketings for Dry Edible Peas by Month – United States: Marketing Years 2008-2009 through 2010-2011 .......................................................................................................................................... 35 Prices Received and Farm Marketings for Austrian Winter Peas by Month – United States: Marketing Years 2008-2009 through 2010-2011 .......................................................................................................................................... 36 Prices Received and Farm Marketings for Corn by Month – United States: Marketing Years 2008-2009 through 2010-2011 ............................................................................................................................................................ 36 Market Year Average Prices Received for Sorghum Grain – States and United States: Marketing Years 2008 through 2010 ...................................................................................................................................................................... 37 Percent of Sorghum Grain Farm Marketings by Month – States and United States: Marketing Years 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 ................................................................................................................................................................... 37 Prices Received for Sorghum Grain by Month – States and United States: Marketing Years 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 ................................................................................................................................................................... 38 Soybean Market Year Average Prices Received – States and United States: Marketing Years 2008 through 2010 ........... 40 Prices Received for Soybeans by Month – States and United States: Marketing Years 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 ................................................................................................................................................................... 41 Percent of Soybean Farm Marketings by Month – States and United States: Marketing Years 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 ................................................................................................................................................................... 43 Reliability of Prices Received Estimates .............................................................................................................................. 44 Prices Paid by Farmers .......................................................................................................................................................... 45 Prices Paid Indexes and Related Parity Ratios – United States: September 2011 with Comparisons .................................. 46 Prices Paid Indexes and Annual Weights for Input Components and Sub-Components – United States: September 2011 with Comparisons ................................................................................................................................... 47 Paid Indexes by Month, All Items and Production Items – United States: 1990-1992=100 Chart ................................................................................................................................ 48 Paid Indexes, Annual Averages, Production Items, Interest, Taxes, and Wages – United States: 1990-1992=100 Chart ................................................................................................................................ 48 Paid Indexes by Farm Type, All Items – United States: 1990-1992=100 Chart ................................................................... 49 Paid Indexes by Origin, All Production Items – United States: 1990-1992=100 Chart ....................................................... 49 Paid Indexes by Non-Farm Sector, Supplies & Repairs, Fertilizer, Machinery, and Fuel – United States: 1990-1992=100 Chart ................................................................................................................................ 50 Paid Indexes by Month, Feed and Replacement Livestock – United States: 1990-1992=100 Chart .................................... 50 Feed Price Ratios – United States: September 2011 with Comparisons ............................................................................... 51 Prices Received Used to Calculate Feed Price Ratios – United States: September 2011 with Comparisons ....................... 51 Prices Paid for Feeder Livestock – United States: September 2011 with Comparisons ....................................................... 51 Reliability of Prices Paid Estimates ...................................................................................................................................... 52 Information Contacts ............................................................................................................................................................ 53

Page 4: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

4 Agricultural Prices (September 2011) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Received by Farmers The September All Farm Products Index is 183 percent of its 1990-1992 base, down 0.5 percent from the August index but 28 percent above the September 2010 index. All crops: The September index, at 210, is unchanged from August but 38 percent above September 2010. Index increases for fruits & nuts, feed grains & hay, and upland cotton offset index decreases for oilseeds, food grains, commercial vegetables, and potatoes & dry beans. Food grains: The September index, at 245, is 1.6 percent below the previous month but 30 percent above a year ago. The September all wheat price, at $7.53 per bushel, is down 8 cents from August but $1.74 above September 2010. Feed grains & hay: The September index, at 281, is unchanged from last month but 62 percent above a year ago. The corn price, at $6.69 per bushel, is down 19 cents from last month but $2.61 above September 2010. The all hay price, at $176 per ton, is up $4.00 from August and $64.00 higher than last September. Sorghum grain, at $11.70 per cwt, is $1.00 above August and $4.44 above September last year. Cotton, Upland: The September index, at 157, is up 1.3 percent from August and 28 percent above last year. The September price, at 95.4 cents per pound, is up 1.4 cents from the previous month and 20.7 cents above last September. Oilseeds: The September index, at 215, is down 10 percent from August but 44 percent higher than September 2010. The soybean price, at $13.10 per bushel, decreased 30 cents from August but is $3.12 above September 2010. Fruits & nuts: The September index, at 182, is up 4.0 percent from August and 15 percent higher than a year ago. Price increases for apples, strawberries, and grapefruit more than offset price decreases for grapes, lemons, and oranges. Commercial vegetables: The September index, at 144, is down 2.7 percent from last month and 3.4 percent below September 2010. Price decreases for onions, sweet corn, and broccoli more than offset price increases during September for cucumbers, tomatoes, and lettuce. Potatoes & dry beans: The September index, at 172, is down 4.4 percent from last month but 35 percent above September 2010. The all potato price, at $9.32 per cwt, is down $1.15 from August but up $2.10 from last September. The all dry bean price, at $40.90 per cwt, is up $6.90 from the previous month and $14.40 above September 2010. Livestock and products: The September index, at 151, is 4.4 percent below last month but up 13 percent from September 2010. Compared with a year ago, prices are higher for cattle, milk, eggs, hogs, calves, and turkeys. Prices for broilers are lower than last year. Meat animals: The September index, at 149, is down 2.6 percent from last month but 16 percent higher than last year. The September hog price, at $66.70 per cwt, is down $9.10 from August but $5.70 higher than a year ago. The September beef cattle price of $112 per cwt is up $1.00 from last month and $17.90 higher than September 2010. Dairy products: The September index, at 160, is down 4.8 percent from a month ago but 18 percent higher than September last year. The September all milk price of $20.90 per cwt is down $1.10 from last month but $3.20 higher than September 2010. Poultry & eggs: The September index, at 147, is down 8.1 percent from August but unchanged from a year ago. The September market egg price, at 76.9 cents per dozen, decreased 22.2 cents from August but is 32.3 cents above September 2010. The September broiler price, at 44.0 cents per pound, is down 4.0 cents from August and 5.0 cents below a year ago. The September turkey price, at 72.1 cents per pound, is up 1.4 cents from the previous month and 3.1 cents higher than a year earlier.

Page 5: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

Agricultural Prices (September 2011) 5 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Received Indexes – United States: September 2011 with Comparisons [Revised historical price indexes for months not shown are available at www.nass.usda.gov]

Index 1910-1914 Base 1990-1992 Base

1990-1992 Average

September 2010

August 2011

September 2011

September 2010

August 2011

September 2011

(percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent)

All products ............................................ All crops ................................................. Food grains ........................................ Feed grains & hay .............................. Cotton, Upland ................................... Tobacco ............................................. Oilseeds ............................................ Fruits & nuts ...................................... Commercial vegetables ..................... Potatoes & dry beans ......................... Other crops ........................................ Livestock and products .......................... Meat animals ..................................... Dairy products ................................... Poultry & eggs ................................... Food commodities .................................

639

500 325 363 517

1263 554 716 698 540 493

768

1021 799 282

(NA)

907

753 599 617 632

1563 816

1101 1061 643 622

1028 1308 1089 412

(NA)

1165

1043 789

1001 796

1491 1311 1221 1060 910 635

1214 1559 1354 450

(NA)

1159

1041 775

1003 807

1491 1178 1267 1031 871 635

1159 1520 1286 413

(NA)

143

152 189 173 123 103 149 158 149 127 126

134 128 136 147

141

184

210 249 281 155 99

239 175 148 180 129

158 153 168 160

173

183

210 245 281 157 99

215 182 144 172 129

151 149 160 147

169

(NA) Not available.

Prices Received and Prices Paid Indexes by Month for Selected Groups – United States: 2010 and 2011, 1990-1992 Base [Revised historical price indexes for months not shown are available at www.nass.usda.gov. Blank data cells indicate estimation period has not yet begun]

Month

Index of prices received Index of prices paid

All farm products

All crops

Livestock and

products

All items

Production items

2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011

(percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent)

January ............................ February ........................... March ............................... April .................................. May .................................. June ................................. July ................................... August .............................. September ........................ October ............................ November ......................... December .........................

136 132 137 135 138 135 139 141 143 151 154 152

166 171 173 176 175 179 180 184 183

149 145 150 146 147 144 147 151 152 163 172 169

189 200 197 200 203 208 206 210 210

121 122 127 128 131 129 132 134 134 134 134 134

137 144 152 156 152 153 155 158 151

180 180 181 182 182 181 181 182 183 185 187 189

196 198 201 204 204 204 204 205 205

185 184 185 187 187 186 186 187 188 191 194 197

204 207 212 215 215 215 216 216 217

Page 6: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

6 Agricultural Prices (September 2011) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

50

70

90

110

130

150

170

190

210

230

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percent

Received Indexes by Month,Livestock Products, All Products, and All Crops –United States: 1990-1992=100

Livestock Products All Products All Crops

25

75

125

175

225

275

325

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percent

Received Indexes by Month,Food Grains, Feed Grains & Hay, and Oilseeds –United States: 1990-1992=100

Food Grain Feed Grain & Hay Oilseeds

Page 7: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

Agricultural Prices (September 2011) 7 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

50

100

150

200

250

300

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percent

Received Indexes by Month,Fruit & Nut and Commercial Vegetables –United States: 1990-1992=100

Fruit & Nut Commercial Vegetable

50

70

90

110

130

150

170

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percent

Received Indexes by Month,Meat Animal, Dairy Product, and Poultry & Egg –United States: 1990-1992=100

Meat Animal Dairy Product Poultry & Egg

Page 8: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

8 Agricultural Prices (September 2011) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Received for Field Crops and Fruits – United States: September 2011 with Comparisons

Commodity Average 1990-1992=100 September 2010 August 2011 Preliminary

September 2011

Field crops Austrian winter peas ............................................ dollars/cwt Barley, all ....................................................... dollars/bushel Feed ............................................................ dollars/bushel Malting ......................................................... dollars/bushel Beans, dry edible ................................................ dollars/cwt Canola ................................................................ dollars/cwt Chickpeas, all ..................................................... dollars/cwt Large ................................................................ dollars/cwt Small ................................................................. dollars/cwt Corn ............................................................... dollars/bushel Cotton, Upland ................................................ dollars/pound Cottonseed 1 ........................................................ dollars/ton Flaxseed ........................................................ dollars/bushel Hay, all, baled ...................................................... dollars/ton Alfalfa ................................................................. dollars/ton Other .................................................................. dollars/ton Lentils ................................................................. dollars/cwt Oats ............................................................... dollars/bushel Peanuts, in-shell ............................................. dollars/pound Peas, dry edible .................................................. dollars/cwt Potatoes ............................................................. dollars/cwt Rice, all ............................................................... dollars/cwt Long .................................................................. dollars/cwt Medium and short ............................................. dollars/cwt Sorghum grain .................................................... dollars/cwt Soybeans ....................................................... dollars/bushel Sunflowers, all ..................................................... dollars/cwt Wheat, all ....................................................... dollars/bushel Winter .......................................................... dollars/bushel Durum .......................................................... dollars/bushel Other spring ................................................. dollars/bushel Hard red winter 2 .......................................... dollars/bushel Soft red winter 2 ............................................ dollars/bushel Hard red spring 2 .......................................... dollars/bushel White 2 ......................................................... dollars/bushel Fruits Citrus, equivalent on-tree Grapefruit .......................................................... dollars/box Lemons ............................................................. dollars/box Oranges ............................................................ dollars/box Tangelos ........................................................... dollars/box Tangerines and mandarins ................................ dollars/box Noncitrus, fresh Apples 3 ........................................................ dollars/pound Grapes 3 ............................................................. dollars/ton Peaches 3 ........................................................... dollars/ton Pears 3 ............................................................... dollars/ton Strawberries ...................................................... dollars/cwt

(NA) 2.12 1.90 2.43

19.10 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) 2.30

0.606 96.00 4.27

76.30 77.20 60.00 (NA) 1.22

0.304 (NA)

5.82 7.07 (NA) (NA) 3.75 5.61 9.50

2.96 2.93 2.86 3.11 (NA) (NA) (NA) 3.24

5.77 10.10 5.79 5.82

15.11

0.212 506.00 432.00 370.00 56.00

16.60 3.61 2.89 3.96

26.50 17.40 25.00 25.30 21.20 4.08

0.747

154.00 10.80

112.00 119.00 96.80 23.30 2.30

0.199 8.69

7.22

11.10 10.10 17.00 7.26 9.98

17.30

5.79 5.76 4.89 5.97 5.82 5.89 6.03 5.54

4.70 19.72 6.88 (NA)

(S)

0.365 420.00 497.00 486.00 73.30

(S) 5.20 4.85 5.24

34.00 23.10 35.10 42.80 18.80 6.88

0.940

213.00 14.30

172.00 191.00 127.00 24.30 3.19

0.232 14.30

10.47 13.60 12.40 18.60 10.70 13.40 32.20

7.61 7.26

10.20 8.30 7.40 7.08 8.39 6.79

7.10 21.99 9.58 (NA) (NA)

0.434 960.00 622.00 620.00 92.80

(S) 5.52 5.05 5.70

40.90 24.00

(D) (D) (D)

6.69

0.954 245.00 14.40

176.00 196.00 128.00 28.50 3.32

0.232 15.40

9.32

13.80 12.70 18.80 11.70 13.10 33.50

7.53 6.99

10.60 8.13 (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

9.50 15.34 8.44 (NA) (NA)

0.480 810.00 606.00 585.00 111.00

(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (NA) Not available. (S) Insufficient number of reports to establish an estimate. 1 Marketing year August - February. 2 Preliminary estimates not set for this item. 3 Equivalent packinghouse-door returns for California, Michigan, New York (apples only), and Washington (apples, peaches, and pears). Prices as

sold for other states.

Page 9: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

Agricultural Prices (September 2011) 9 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Received for Vegetables and Livestock – United States: September 2011 with Comparisons [Price data source for livestock and poultry commodities is United States Department of Agriculture's Agricultural Marketing Service]

Commodity Average 1990-1992=100 September 2010 August 2011 Preliminary

September 2011

Vegetables, fresh 1 Asparagus ........................................................... dollars/cwt Beans, snap 2 ...................................................... dollars/cwt Broccoli ................................................................ dollars/cwt Cantaloupes 2 ...................................................... dollars/cwt Carrots ................................................................. dollars/cwt Cauliflower ........................................................... dollars/cwt Celery .................................................................. dollars/cwt Corn, sweet ......................................................... dollars/cwt Cucumbers 2 ........................................................ dollars/cwt Lettuce ................................................................. dollars/cwt Onions 3 ............................................................... dollars/cwt Tomatoes ............................................................ dollars/cwt Livestock Calves ................................................................. dollars/cwt Cattle, all beef ...................................................... dollars/cwt Cows 4 ............................................................... dollars/cwt Steers & heifers ................................................. dollars/cwt Milk cows 5 ........................................................ dollars/head Hogs, all .............................................................. dollars/cwt Barrows & gilts ................................................... dollars/cwt Sows ................................................................. dollars/cwt Lambs ................................................................. dollars/cwt Sheep .................................................................. dollars/cwt Dairy and poultry Milk, all 6 .............................................................. dollars/cwt Fat test .................................................................. percent Broilers, live 7 .................................................. dollars/pound Eggs, all 8 ....................................................... dollars/dozen Market 8 9 ...................................................... dollars/dozen Turkeys, live 8 10 11 .......................................... dollars/pound

79.80 (NA)

22.50 (NA)

13.20 26.80 11.60 15.70 (NA)

11.90 12.80 32.30

94.30 72.90 49.60 77.10

1130.00 47.70 48.40 39.50 56.20 23.40

13.06 3.66

0.317 0.643 0.546 0.380

(S) 69.40 33.30 11.50 26.80 27.70 15.10 24.00 28.50 17.20 11.70 38.40

118.00 94.10 55.20 99.50 (NA)

61.00 61.20 57.80

135.00 48.70

17.70 3.62

0.490 0.634 0.446 0.690

(S) 95.30 35.60 11.90 28.00 30.90 14.30 28.30 30.00 14.70 13.20 30.40

134.00 111.00 70.80

114.00 (NA)

75.80 76.10 68.90

189.00 66.80

22.00 3.56

0.480 1.140 0.991 0.707

(S) 95.30 32.20 16.00 27.60 29.00 12.70 26.40 41.40 15.20 10.60 37.80

133.00 112.00 69.70

116.00 (NA)

66.70 66.70 66.50 (NA) (NA)

20.90 3.63

0.440 0.948 0.769 0.721

Adjusted for seasonal variation Eggs, all .......................................................... dollars/dozen Seasonal factor ...................................................... percent Milk, all 6 .............................................................. dollars/cwt Seasonal factor ...................................................... percent

0.545

100 9.71 100

0.684

93 17.00

104

1.170

97 22.00

100

1.030

92 20.10

104

(NA) Not available. (S) Insufficient number of reports to establish an estimate. 1 Beginning January 2006, point of first sale. FOB shipping point for prior years. 2 Monthly estimates began January 1995. 3 Includes some processing. 4 Beef cows and cull dairy cows sold for slaughter. 5 Animals sold for dairy herd replacement only. Prices available for January, April, July, and October. 6 Before deductions for hauling. Includes quality, quantity, and other premiums. Excludes hauling subsidies. 7 Live weight equivalent price. 8 Mid-month price. 9 Also referred to as table eggs. 10 Live weight equivalent price is used when actual live weight price is not available. 11 Beginning January 2011, price reflects FOB shipping point basis. Prior year price reflects delivered basis.

Page 10: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

10 Agricultural Prices (September 2011) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Dollars per bushel

Prices Received for Corn by Month – United States

2

4

6

8

10

12

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Dollars per bushel

Prices Received for Wheat by Month – United States

Page 11: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

Agricultural Prices (September 2011) 11 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Dollars per pound

Prices Received for Upland Cotton by Month –United States

3

5

7

9

11

13

15

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Dollars per bushel

Prices Received for Soybeans by Month –United States

Page 12: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

12 Agricultural Prices (September 2011) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Dollars per cwt

Prices Received for Cattle by Month – United States

Calves Steers & Heifers All Beef Cattle Cows

10

12

14

16

18

20

22

24

26

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Dollars per cwt

Prices Received for Milk by Month – United States

Page 13: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

Agricultural Prices (September 2011) 13 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Dollars per cwt

Prices Received for Hogs by Month – United States

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Dollars per pound

Prices Received for Poultry by Month –United States

Turkeys Broilers

Page 14: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

14 Agricultural Prices (September 2011) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Received for All Wheat, Corn, and Soybeans by Month – United States: 2011 with Comparisons [Current month prices are mid-month; prices for previous months and years are for the entire month. Blank data cells indicate estimation period has not yet begun]

Month All wheat Corn Soybeans

2009 2010 Preliminary 2011 2009 2010 Preliminary

2011 2009 2010 Preliminary 2011

(dollars per bushel)

(dollars per bushel)

(dollars per bushel)

(dollars per bushel)

(dollars per bushel)

(dollars per bushel)

(dollars per bushel)

(dollars per bushel)

(dollars per bushel)

January ........ February ...... March ........... April ............. May .............. June ............. July .............. August ......... September ... October ........ November .... December ....

6.20 5.79 5.71 5.75 5.85 5.72 5.17 4.85 4.48 4.47 4.79 4.87

4.90 4.73 4.70 4.41 4.34 4.16 4.49 5.44 5.79 5.88 6.10 6.44

6.69 7.42 7.55 8.01 8.16 7.41 7.10 7.61 7.53

4.36 3.87 3.85 3.85 3.96 4.01 3.60 3.33 3.25 3.61 3.65 3.60

3.66 3.55 3.55 3.41 3.48 3.41 3.49 3.65 4.08 4.32 4.55 4.82

4.94 5.65 5.53 6.36 6.32 6.38 6.33 6.88 6.69

9.97 9.54 9.12 9.79

10.70 11.40 10.80 10.80 9.75 9.43 9.53 9.80

9.79 9.41 9.39 9.47 9.41 9.45 9.79

10.10 9.98

10.20 11.10 11.60

11.60 12.70 12.70 13.10 13.20 13.20 13.20 13.40 13.10

Prices Received for Beef Cattle and All Hogs by Month – United States: 2011 with Comparisons [Current month prices are mid-month; prices for previous months and years are for the entire month. Blank data cells indicate estimation period has not yet begun. Price data source is United States Department of Agriculture's Agricultural Marketing Service]

Month Beef cattle 1 All hogs 2

2009 2010 Preliminary 2011 2009 2010 Preliminary

2011

(dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt)

January ............. February ........... March ................ April .................. May ................... June .................. July ................... August .............. September ........ October ............. November ......... December .........

80.10 78.90 79.10 83.80 83.20 80.10 80.90 80.40 80.50 79.20 79.60 78.50

82.30 85.70 90.40 95.60 94.70 90.40 91.70 93.50 94.10 93.10 94.00 98.10

107.00 108.00 115.00 119.00 112.00 107.00 111.00 111.00 112.00

42.80 43.80 43.90 44.00 44.60 43.30 43.30 37.30 37.70 37.80 40.30 45.10

48.40 48.90 52.10 56.50 62.20 58.20 58.50 61.30 61.00 53.30 47.80 52.30

55.80 61.60 63.10 67.70 68.60 69.70 71.70 75.80 66.70

1 Cows and steers & heifers. 2 Barrows & gilts and sows.

Page 15: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

Agricultural Prices (September 2011) 15 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Received for All Wheat – States and United States: September 2011 with Comparisons State September 2010 August 2011 Preliminary

September 2011

(dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel)

Arizona .................................................. Arkansas ............................................... California ............................................... Colorado ................................................ Idaho ..................................................... Illinois .................................................... Indiana .................................................. Kansas .................................................. Michigan ................................................ Minnesota .............................................. Missouri ................................................. Montana ................................................ Nebraska ............................................... North Carolina ....................................... North Dakota ......................................... Ohio ....................................................... Oklahoma .............................................. Oregon .................................................. South Dakota ......................................... Texas .................................................... Washington ........................................... United States .........................................

(D) (D)

5.59 5.67 5.25 5.96 6.31 6.17 6.07 5.56

5.56 5.40 5.62 6.23 5.76 5.68 6.27 6.02 5.98 6.36 5.92

5.79

(D) 6.90 (D)

7.17 6.88 6.99 7.05 7.76 6.96 8.10

6.93 7.79 7.12 7.54 8.26 7.16 7.78 7.04 7.76 7.42 7.49

7.61

(S) 6.80 (D)

7.07 6.90 6.50 6.51 7.35 6.75 8.09

6.40 7.95 7.05 7.47 8.48 6.51 7.43 6.86 7.61 7.24 7.44

7.53

(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (S) Insufficient number of reports to establish an estimate.

Prices Received for Winter Wheat – States and United States: September 2011 with Comparisons State September 2010 August 2011 Preliminary

September 2011

(dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel)

Arkansas ......................................... California ......................................... Colorado .......................................... Idaho ............................................... Illinois .............................................. Indiana ............................................ Kansas ............................................ Michigan .......................................... Minnesota ........................................ Missouri ........................................... Montana .......................................... Nebraska ......................................... North Carolina ................................. North Dakota ................................... Ohio ................................................. Oklahoma ........................................ Oregon ............................................ South Dakota ................................... Texas .............................................. Washington ..................................... United States ...................................

(D) (D)

5.69 5.16 5.96 6.31 6.17 6.07 5.29 5.56

5.11 5.62 6.23 5.06 5.68 6.27 5.94 5.22 6.36 5.80

5.76

6.90 (D)

7.16 6.72 6.99 7.05 7.76 6.96 7.30 6.93

7.02 7.12 7.54 6.75 7.16 7.78 6.76 7.26 7.42 6.97

7.26

6.80 (D)

7.06 6.70 6.50 6.51 7.35 6.75 7.40 6.40

7.20 7.05 7.47 7.00 6.51 7.43 6.60 7.15 7.24 6.70

6.99

(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations.

Page 16: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

16 Agricultural Prices (September 2011) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Received for Durum Wheat – States and United States: September 2011 with Comparisons State September 2010 August 2011 Preliminary

September 2011

(dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel)

Arizona ........................................... California ........................................ Idaho ............................................... Montana .......................................... North Dakota ................................... United States ..................................

(D) (S) (D)

4.44 4.93

4.89

(D) (S)

8.86 9.42

11.00

10.20

(S) (S)

9.10 10.00 11.00

10.60

(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (S) Insufficient number of reports to establish an estimate.

Prices Received for Spring Wheat – States and United States: September 2011 with Comparisons State September 2010 August 2011 Preliminary

September 2011

(dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel)

Colorado ......................................... Idaho ............................................... Minnesota ....................................... Montana .......................................... North Dakota ................................... Oregon ............................................ South Dakota .................................. Washington ..................................... United States ..................................

(D) 5.47 5.57 6.07 5.96 6.50 6.44 6.50

5.97

(D) 7.24 8.12 8.47 8.16 8.29 8.49 8.59

8.30

(D) 7.15 8.10 8.50 8.10 8.20 8.31 8.41

8.13

(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations.

Page 17: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

Agricultural Prices (September 2011) 17 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Received for All Barley – States and United States: September 2011 with Comparisons State September 2010 August 2011 Preliminary

September 2011

(dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel)

California ......................................... Colorado .......................................... Idaho ............................................... Minnesota ........................................ Montana .......................................... North Dakota ................................... Oregon ............................................ Utah ................................................. Washington ..................................... Wyoming ......................................... United States ...................................

(D) 3.86 3.99 (D)

3.83 3.11 3.20 3.05 3.26 (D)

3.61

(D) 5.25 5.46 (D)

4.89 5.28 5.59 5.55 5.05 (D)

5.20

(S) (D)

5.75 (D) (D)

5.43 4.80 5.72 4.99 (D)

5.52

(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (S) Insufficient number of reports to establish an estimate.

Prices Received for Malting Barley – States: September 2011 with Comparisons State September 2010 August 2011 Preliminary

September 2011

(dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel)

Idaho ............................................... Minnesota ........................................ Montana .......................................... North Dakota ................................... Wyoming .........................................

4.13 (D)

4.09 3.67 (D)

5.46 (D)

4.95 5.35 (D)

5.75 (D) (D)

5.70 (D)

(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations.

Prices Received for Feed Barley – States: September 2011 with Comparisons State September 2010 August 2011 Preliminary

September 2011

(dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel)

Idaho ............................................... Minnesota ........................................ Montana .......................................... North Dakota ................................... Wyoming .........................................

3.27 2.33 2.60 2.31

(S)

5.62 4.29 4.56 4.75 (D)

5.90 (D) (D)

4.80 (D)

(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (S) Insufficient number of reports to establish an estimate.

Page 18: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

18 Agricultural Prices (September 2011) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Received for Corn – States and United States: September 2011 with Comparisons State September 2010 August 2011 Preliminary

September 2011

(dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel)

Colorado ......................................... Illinois .............................................. Indiana ............................................ Iowa ................................................ Kansas ............................................ Kentucky ......................................... Michigan ......................................... Minnesota ....................................... Missouri .......................................... Nebraska ........................................ North Carolina ................................. North Dakota ................................... Ohio ................................................ Pennsylvania .................................. South Dakota .................................. Tennessee ...................................... Texas .............................................. Wisconsin ....................................... United States ..................................

3.97 4.05 4.24 4.01 4.09 4.11 4.03 3.79 4.13 3.99

4.61 3.67 4.21 4.90 3.62 4.34 4.18 3.98

4.08

7.06 6.96 7.18 6.84 6.89 6.38 7.22 6.49 7.15 6.93

6.99 6.36 7.40 8.52 6.75 6.32 7.00 7.09

6.88

6.77 6.80 7.00 6.55 6.65 6.80 6.90 6.00 6.70 6.60

7.26 6.30 7.03 7.78 6.50 6.40 7.20 6.60

6.69

Prices Received for Soybeans – States and United States: September 2011 with Comparisons State September 2010 August 2011 Preliminary

September 2011

(dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel)

Arkansas ......................................... Illinois .............................................. Indiana ............................................ Iowa ................................................ Kansas ............................................ Kentucky ......................................... Louisiana ........................................ Michigan ......................................... Minnesota ....................................... Mississippi ...................................... Missouri .......................................... Nebraska ........................................ North Carolina ................................. North Dakota ................................... Ohio ................................................ South Dakota .................................. Tennessee ...................................... Wisconsin ....................................... United States ..................................

10.10 10.00 10.10 9.87 9.82 9.79

10.10 9.71 9.48

10.10

10.10 9.71

11.00 9.50

10.20 9.64

10.30 9.80

9.98

13.20 13.70 13.70 13.50 13.50 13.50 11.80 13.30 13.00 13.60

13.70 13.30 14.00 12.80 13.60 13.00 13.00 13.40

13.40

13.20 13.60 13.40 13.00 13.00 13.20 12.10 12.90 12.90 13.00

13.50 13.00 13.40 12.50 13.20 12.70 12.90 12.90

13.10

Page 19: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

Agricultural Prices (September 2011) 19 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Received for Oats – States and United States: September 2011 with Comparisons State September 2010 August 2011 Preliminary

September 2011

(dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel)

Illinois .............................................. Iowa ................................................. Michigan .......................................... Minnesota ........................................ Montana .......................................... Nebraska ......................................... New York ......................................... North Dakota ................................... Oregon ............................................ Pennsylvania ................................... South Dakota ................................... Texas .............................................. Wisconsin ........................................ United States ...................................

(D) 2.18 2.37 2.15 (D)

2.93 1.72 2.11 (D)

3.10 2.42

(S) 1.96

2.30

(D) 3.20 3.24 2.94

(S) 3.53 4.10 3.01

(S) 3.98 3.39

(S) 3.12

3.19

(S) 3.40 3.50 3.10

(S) 3.50 (D) (D) (S)

4.03 3.40

(S) 3.25

3.32

(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (S) Insufficient number of reports to establish an estimate.

Prices Received for Sorghum Grain – States and United States: September 2011 with Comparisons State September 2010 August 2011 Preliminary

September 2011

(dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt)

Arkansas ......................................... Illinois .............................................. Kansas ............................................ Louisiana ......................................... Missouri ........................................... Nebraska ......................................... Oklahoma ........................................ Texas .............................................. United States ...................................

7.61 7.35 7.16 7.76 7.10 6.59 7.43 7.33

7.26

10.90 (D)

12.20 10.10

(D) 11.70 11.80 10.60

10.70

10.90 (S)

11.60 (D)

11.00 11.60 11.60

(D)

11.70

(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (S) Insufficient number of reports to establish an estimate.

Page 20: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

20 Agricultural Prices (September 2011) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Received for Dry Beans – States and United States: September 2011 with Comparisons State September 2010 August 2011 Preliminary

September 2011

(dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt)

California ........................................ Colorado ......................................... Idaho ............................................... Michigan ......................................... Minnesota ....................................... Nebraska ........................................ North Dakota ................................... United States ..................................

44.60 24.00 27.60 29.00 27.40 24.90 24.40

26.50

(D)

41.10 35.70

(D) 35.20 39.50 35.40

34.00

(D)

40.80 34.30 45.00

(D) 42.70 40.00

40.90

(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations.

Prices Received for Peanuts (In-Shell) – States and United States: September 2011 with Comparisons State September 2010 August 2011 Preliminary

September 2011

(dollars per pound) (dollars per pound) (dollars per pound)

Alabama ......................................... Florida ............................................. Georgia ........................................... Mississippi ...................................... New Mexico .................................... North Carolina ................................. Oklahoma ....................................... South Carolina ................................ Texas .............................................. Virginia ............................................ United States ..................................

0.192 0.188 0.197 0.197 0.214 0.236

(D) 0.226 0.253 0.214

0.199

0.233 0.230 0.226 0.245

(S) 0.268

(S) 0.253 0.262 0.234

0.232

0.227 0.202 0.239 0.222

(S) 0.255

(S) 0.248

(S) (S)

0.232

(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (S) Insufficient number of reports to establish an estimate.

Page 21: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

Agricultural Prices (September 2011) 21 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Received for Sunflower – States and United States: September 2011 with Comparisons State September 2010 August 2011 Preliminary

September 2011

(dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt)

Colorado .......................................... Kansas ............................................ Minnesota ........................................ North Dakota ................................... South Dakota ................................... United States ...................................

(D) 23.90

(D) 16.70 15.70

17.30

(S) (D)

38.70 32.10 31.70

32.20

(S) 28.00 36.80 35.20 31.70

33.50

(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (S) Insufficient number of reports to establish an estimate.

Prices Received for Canola – States and United States: September 2011 with Comparisons State September 2010 August 2011 Preliminary

September 2011

(dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt)

Minnesota ........................................ North Dakota ................................... United States ...................................

19.30 17.40

17.40

24.10 23.10

23.10

(S) 24.00

24.00

(S) Insufficient number of reports to establish an estimate.

Prices Received for Flaxseed – States and United States: September 2011 with Comparisons State September 2010 August 2011 Preliminary

September 2011

(dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel)

North Dakota ................................... United States ...................................

10.80

10.80

14.30

14.30

14.40

14.40

Page 22: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

22 Agricultural Prices (September 2011) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Received for Upland Cotton and Cottonseed – States and United States: September 2011 with Comparisons [Cottonseed marketing year August - February]

State

Cotton, Upland Cottonseed

September 2010

August 2011

Preliminary September

2011

September 2010

August 2011

Preliminary September

2011

(dollars per pound) (dollars per pound) (dollars per pound) (dollars per ton) (dollars per ton) (dollars per ton)

Alabama ............................ Arizona .............................. Arkansas ............................ California ........................... Georgia .............................. Louisiana ........................... Mississippi ......................... North Carolina .................... Tennessee ......................... Texas ................................. United States .....................

0.741 (D)

0.793 (S)

0.773 0.740 0.766 0.689 0.893 0.749

0.747

(S) (S) (S) (S) (S) (D) (S) (S) (S)

0.940

0.940

(S) (S) (S) (S) (S) (D) (S) (S) (S)

0.954

0.954

(S) (S) (S) (S) (S)

165.00 159.00 139.00

(S) 150.00

154.00

(NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA)

213.00

213.00

(S) (D)

314.00 (S) (S)

257.00 (S) (S) (S)

236.00

245.00

(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (NA) Not available. (S) Insufficient number of reports to establish an estimate.

Prices Received and Farm Marketings for Upland Cotton and Rice – United States: September 2011 with Comparisons

Item September 2010 August 2011 Preliminary September 2011

Cotton, Upland Average price ..................................... dollars/pound Marketings 1 .......................................... 1,000 bales Rice, all Average price .......................................... dollars/cwt Marketings 2 ............................................. 1,000 cwt Rice, long Average price .......................................... dollars/cwt Marketings 2 ............................................. 1,000 cwt Rice, medium and short Average price .......................................... dollars/cwt Marketings 2 ............................................. 1,000 cwt

0.747 476

11.10 15,095

10.10 12,764

17.00 2,331

0.940 506

13.60 11,056

12.40 8,925

18.60 2,131

0.954 (NA)

13.80 (NA)

12.70 (NA)

18.80 (NA)

(NA) Not available. 1 Marketings based on a survey of cotton buyers in the major producing States - Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Georgia, Louisiana,

Mississippi, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Texas. 2 Purchases by private firms and rice (rough equivalent) shipped by cooperatives.

Page 23: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

Agricultural Prices (September 2011) 23 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Received for Hay by Type – States and United States: September 2011 with Comparisons

State

All hay Alfalfa hay Other hay

September 2010

August 2011

Preliminary September

2011

September 2010

August 2011

Preliminary September

2011

September 2010

August 2011

Preliminary September

2011

(dollars per ton)

(dollars per ton)

(dollars per ton)

(dollars per ton)

(dollars per ton)

(dollars per ton)

(dollars per ton)

(dollars per ton)

(dollars per ton)

Arizona ............ California ......... Colorado .......... Idaho ............... Illinois .............. Iowa ................. Kansas ............ Kentucky .......... Michigan .......... Minnesota ........ Missouri ........... Montana .......... Nebraska ......... Nevada ............ New Mexico ..... New York ......... North Dakota ... Ohio ................. Oklahoma ........ Oregon ............ Pennsylvania ... South Dakota ... Texas .............. Utah ................. Washington ..... Wisconsin ........ Wyoming ......... United States ...

120.00 121.00 124.00 116.00 122.00 107.00 97.00 85.00 92.00 95.00

70.00 79.00 74.00

120.00 164.00 97.00 56.00

106.00 84.00

147.00

118.00 74.00

123.00 108.00 148.00 99.00 88.00

112.00

216.00 220.00 187.00 227.00 134.00 126.00 156.00 117.00 96.00

108.00

81.00 94.00

107.00 216.00 253.00 124.00 61.00

149.00 142.00 225.00

136.00 102.00 165.00 184.00 200.00 100.00 121.00

172.00

216.00 225.00 195.00 220.00 141.00 123.00 158.00 108.00 102.00 115.00

87.00 91.00

114.00 215.00 264.00 100.00 65.00

141.00 156.00 216.00

105.00 123.00 176.00 184.00 207.00 101.00 135.00

176.00

120.00 128.00 125.00 120.00 133.00 112.00 110.00 135.00 105.00 110.00

135.00 78.00 77.00

120.00 167.00 120.00 59.00

151.00 138.00 135.00

150.00 75.00

180.00 108.00 135.00 105.00 90.00

119.00

220.00 232.00 190.00 230.00 150.00 128.00 180.00 175.00 105.00 115.00

200.00 94.00

112.00 219.00 259.00 135.00 65.00

188.00 204.00 226.00

177.00 105.00 246.00 188.00 195.00 105.00 123.00

191.00

220.00 236.00 200.00 228.00 155.00 132.00 185.00 175.00 110.00 125.00

220.00 91.00

122.00 220.00 269.00 115.00 71.00

177.00 218.00 235.00

161.00 130.00 249.00 187.00 210.00 115.00 140.00

196.00

125.00 97.00

110.00 90.00 84.00 79.00 70.00 70.00 75.00 60.00

60.00 88.00 66.00

125.00 136.00 90.00 42.00 76.00 76.00

164.00

108.00 68.00

110.00 99.00

180.00 75.00 82.00

96.80

180.00 170.00 170.00 150.00 92.00 83.00

100.00 80.00 80.00 85.00

65.00 92.00 87.00

180.00 193.00 121.00 49.00 89.00

102.00 224.00

125.00 82.00

135.00 151.00 210.00 75.00

115.00

127.00

170.00 174.00 160.00 139.00 100.00 90.00 95.00 80.00 85.00 85.00

65.00 91.00 90.00

170.00 209.00 95.00 53.00 98.00

120.00 190.00

89.00 97.00

155.00 151.00 200.00 75.00

120.00

128.00

Prices Received for Apples – States and United States: September 2011 with Comparisons [Equivalent packinghouse-door returns for California, Michigan, New York, and Washington. Prices at point of first sale for other States]

State Apples, fresh use

September 2010 August 2011 Preliminary September 2011

(dollars per pound) (dollars per pound) (dollars per pound)

California ......................................... Michigan .......................................... New York ......................................... Ohio ................................................. Pennsylvania ................................... Virginia ............................................ Washington ..................................... United States ...................................

0.349 0.320 0.285 0.460 0.416 0.280 0.392

0.365

0.634 (NA) (NA)

0.430 (S)

(NA) 0.405

0.434

(S) 0.435 0.396 0.460

(S) 0.470 0.504

0.480

(NA) Not available. (S) Insufficient number of reports to establish an estimate.

Page 24: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

24 Agricultural Prices (September 2011) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Received for Citrus Fruits by Utilization – States and United States: September 2010 [Net pounds per box: grapefruit in California-67, Florida-85, Texas-80; lemons-76; oranges in California-75, Florida-90, Texas-85; tangelos in Florida-90; tangerines and mandarins in Arizona and California-75, Florida-95]

Commodity, State,

and type

FOB packed fresh

Equivalent returns

Packinghouse-door On-tree

All Fresh Process All Fresh Process

(dollars per box)

(dollars per box)

(dollars per box)

(dollars per box)

(dollars per box)

(dollars per box)

(dollars per box)

Grapefruit California 1 ...................................... Lemons California ......................................... Oranges California Valencia ......................................

17.60

43.00

20.50

7.80

25.59

9.57

7.80

32.10

11.98

(S)

(D)

(D)

4.70

19.72

6.88

4.70

26.23

9.29

(S)

(D)

(D)

(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (S) Insufficient number of reports to establish an estimate. 1 Some processed sales included in fresh sales.

Page 25: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

Agricultural Prices (September 2011) 25 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Received for Citrus Fruits by Utilization – States and United States: August 2011 [Net pounds per box: grapefruit in California-80, Florida-85, Texas-80; lemons-80; oranges in California-80, Florida-90, Texas-85; tangelos in Florida-90; tangerines and mandarins in Arizona and California-80, Florida-95]

Commodity, State,

and type

FOB packed fresh

Equivalent returns

Packinghouse-door On-tree

All Fresh Process All Fresh Process

(dollars per box)

(dollars per box)

(dollars per box)

(dollars per box)

(dollars per box)

(dollars per box)

(dollars per box)

Grapefruit California 1 ...................................... Lemons California ........................................ Oranges California Valencia ......................................

15.60

42.20

22.00

9.20

27.98

12.01

9.20

31.08

13.36

(D)

(D)

(D)

7.10

21.99

9.58

7.10

25.09

10.95

(D)

(D)

(D)

(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. 1 Some processed sales included in fresh sales.

Page 26: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

26 Agricultural Prices (September 2011) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Received for Citrus Fruits by Utilization – States and United States: September 2011 [Net pounds per box: grapefruit in California-80, Florida-85, Texas-80; lemons-80; oranges in California-80, Florida-90, Texas-85; tangelos in Florida-90; tangerines and mandarins in Arizona and California-80, Florida-95]

Commodity, State,

and type

FOB packed fresh

Equivalent returns

Packinghouse-door On-tree

All Fresh Process All Fresh Process

(dollars per box)

(dollars per box)

(dollars per box)

(dollars per box)

(dollars per box)

(dollars per box)

(dollars per box)

Grapefruit California 1 ...................................... Lemons California ......................................... Oranges California Valencia ......................................

18.00

39.70

22.30

11.60

21.33

10.89

11.60

28.58

13.66

(D)

(D)

(D)

9.50

15.34

8.44

9.50

22.59

11.25

(D)

(D)

(D)

(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. 1 Some processed sales included in fresh sales.

Page 27: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

Agricultural Prices (September 2011) 27 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Received for Potatoes – States and United States: September 2011 with Comparisons State September 2010 August 2011 Preliminary

September 2011

(dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt)

California Spring .......................................... Fall .............................................. All 1 .............................................. Colorado Fresh 1 ......................................... All 1 .............................................. Florida ............................................. Idaho Fresh 2 ......................................... Processing ................................... All 1 .............................................. Maine .............................................. Michigan .......................................... Minnesota ........................................ New York ......................................... North Carolina ................................. North Dakota Fresh 2 ......................................... Processing ................................... All 1 .............................................. Oregon ............................................ Texas .............................................. Virginia ............................................ Washington Processing ................................... All 1 .............................................. Wisconsin Fresh 2 ......................................... Processing ................................... All 1 .............................................. United States Fresh 2 ......................................... Processing ................................... All 1 ..............................................

(S) (S) (S)

12.30 11.00

(S)

8.20 6.10 6.50 8.35 8.70 7.30

13.80 (S)

14.00 6.90 8.20 6.90

18.40 (S)

5.60 6.35

10.20 7.30 8.70

11.14 6.16 7.22

(S) (S) (S)

19.90 19.10

(S)

13.80 7.10 8.30 (D)

9.65 18.20 21.70

(S)

(S) (S) (S)

7.30 (S) (S)

7.30 9.90

21.00 9.00

13.80

23.05 7.24

10.47

(S) (S) (S)

(D)

14.20

(S)

(D) (D)

7.60 (D)

9.45 (D)

16.30 (S)

(D) (D) (D)

7.45 (S) (S)

(D) 8.65

(D) (D) (D)

(D) (D)

9.32

(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (S) Insufficient number of reports to establish an estimate. 1 Average price of potatoes sold for all uses, including table stock, processing, seed, and livestock feed. 2 Fresh market prices only. Includes table stock prices.

Page 28: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

28 Agricultural Prices (September 2011) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Received for All Milk – States and United States: September 2011 with Comparisons [Before deduction for hauling. Includes quality, quantity, and other premiums. Excludes hauling subsidies]

State September 2010 August 2011 Preliminary

September 2011

Price Fat test Price Fat test Price Fat test

(dollars per cwt) (percent) (dollars per cwt) (percent) (dollars per cwt) (percent)

Arizona ................................ California ............................. Colorado .............................. Florida .................................. Idaho .................................... Illinois ................................... Indiana ................................. Iowa ..................................... Kansas ................................. Michigan .............................. Minnesota ............................ Missouri ............................... New Mexico ......................... New York ............................. Ohio ..................................... Oregon ................................. Pennsylvania ....................... Texas ................................... Utah ..................................... Vermont ............................... Virginia ................................. Washington .......................... Wisconsin ............................ United States .......................

17.00 16.35 17.70 21.40 16.50 18.70 18.50 18.10 18.60 18.10

18.20 17.90 17.00 18.60 19.20 19.10 19.60 18.40 17.40 19.20

20.50 17.40 17.80

17.70

3.44 3.63 3.43 3.60 3.59 3.67 3.62 3.60 3.59 3.55

3.67 3.59 3.48 3.65 3.65 3.71 3.65 3.67 3.64 3.75

3.59 3.71 3.61

3.62

22.00 19.91 22.00 26.60 19.50 22.80 22.50 22.60 22.60 23.20

22.80 23.60 21.50 23.50 23.40 24.00 24.20 23.00 21.30 23.70

25.20 22.60 22.60

22.00

3.48 3.58 3.39 3.65 3.49 3.55 3.50 3.54 3.55 3.50

3.63 3.52 3.42 3.59 3.56 3.63 3.55 3.67 3.54 3.65

3.55 3.63 3.56

3.56

21.40 18.50 21.50 26.90 17.50 21.80 22.00 21.80 21.80 22.60

21.00 23.00 21.00 23.10 22.90 23.30 23.60 22.50 21.00 23.10

25.10 21.20 20.90

20.90

3.50 3.63 3.45 3.68 3.56 3.60 3.57 3.62 3.63 3.57

3.71 3.58 3.50 3.67 3.65 3.69 3.70 3.73 3.58 3.75

3.63 3.69 3.64

3.63

Page 29: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

Agricultural Prices (September 2011) 29 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Received for Milk Cows – States and United States: July 2011 with Comparisons [Animals sold for dairy herd replacement only. Prices estimated in January, April, July, and October]

State July 2010 April 2011 July 2011

(dollars per head) (dollars per head) (dollars per head)

Arizona ............................................ California ......................................... Colorado .......................................... Florida ............................................. Idaho ............................................... Illinois .............................................. Indiana ............................................ Iowa ................................................. Kansas ............................................ Michigan .......................................... Minnesota ........................................ Missouri ........................................... New Mexico ..................................... New York ......................................... Ohio ................................................. Oregon ............................................ Pennsylvania ................................... Texas .............................................. Utah ................................................. Vermont ........................................... Virginia ............................................ Washington ..................................... Wisconsin ........................................ United States ...................................

1,300 1,300 1,350 1,360 1,350 1,350 1,260 1,250 1,250 1,400

1,270 1,150 1,320 1,300 1,300 1,320 1,400 1,230 1,250 1,400

1,320 1,300 1,400

1,320

1,450 1,300 1,450 1,480 1,450 1,430 1,450 1,430 1,400 1,550

1,410 1,280 1,380 1,400 1,470 1,390 1,450 1,400 1,300 1,500

1,410 1,400 1,560

1,420

1,500 1,400 1,550 1,540 1,500 1,440 1,500 1,470 1,400 1,550

1,480 1,290 1,460 1,450 1,520 1,450 1,550 1,450 1,340 1,600

1,460 1,450 1,570

1,480

Page 30: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

30 Agricultural Prices (September 2011) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Commodity Parity Prices and Price as Percent of Parity Price – United States: September 2011 with Comparisons [Parity prices are computed under the provisions of Title III, Subtitle a, Section 301 (a) of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938 as amended by the Agricultural Acts of 1948, 1949, and 1956. See January Agricultural Prices for details on adjusted base price and parity price computations. Parity data not available for blank cells. Primary source of data for livestock and milk prices is United States Department of Agriculture's Agricultural Marketing Service]

Commodity and unit Adjusted

base price

Parity price Price as percent of parity

September 2010

August 2011

September 2011

September 2010

August 2011

September 2011

(dollars) (dollars) (dollars) (dollars) (percent) (percent) (percent)

Basic commodities All wheat ....................................... bushel Rice ................................................... cwt Corn .............................................. bushel Cotton Upland ...................................... pound American Pima .......................... pound Peanuts ......................................... pound Designated nonbasic All milk, to plants 1 ................................ cwt Honey, extracted 2 ......................... pound Wool and mohair Wool ............................................. pound Mohair ........................................... pound Other nonbasic Apples, fresh 3 ............................... pound Barley ........................................... bushel Canola ............................................... cwt Cottonseed ........................................ ton Dry edible beans ................................ cwt Flaxseed ....................................... bushel Oats .............................................. bushel Potatoes ............................................. cwt Sorghum grain ................................... cwt Soybeans ...................................... bushel Sunflower, all ..................................... cwt Citrus (equivalent on-tree) Grapefruit ........................................... box Lemons .............................................. box Oranges ............................................. box Tangerines ......................................... box Livestock and poultry Beef cattle .......................................... cwt Calves ................................................ cwt Hogs .................................................. cwt Lambs ................................................ cwt Sheep ................................................ cwt Eggs 1 ............................................ dozen Turkeys, live .................................. pound

0.608 1.63

0.384

0.071 0.129 0.027

1.82 0.134

0.092 0.324

0.033 0.425 1.740 15.40 2.92

1.020 0.250 0.834 0.675 0.948 1.91

0.663 1.36

0.686 1.43

10.10 14.10 5.51

11.70 4.38

0.091 0.056

14.60 33.60 9.07

2.05 3.22

0.707

44.60 3.10

2.07 8.36

0.805 10.10 39.70

368.00 70.20 23.70 5.95

20.30 16.00 22.30 45.10

15.80 33.60 16.10 33.90

249.00 351.00 135.00 280.00 106.00

2.22 1.370

16.50 44.30 10.40

1.93 3.50

0.733

49.40 3.64

2.50 8.80

0.896 11.50 47.30

418.00 79.30 27.70 6.79

22.70 18.30 25.70 51.90

18.00 36.90 18.60 38.80

274.00 383.00 150.00 318.00 119.00

2.47 1.520

16.60 44.50 10.50

1.94 3.52

0.737

49.70 3.66

2.51 8.85

0.901 11.60 47.50

420.00 79.70 27.80 6.83

22.80 18.40 25.90 52.10

18.10 37.10 18.70 39.00

276.00 385.00 150.00 319.00 120.00

2.48 1.530

40 33 45

36 36 28

38 47

38 32

45 36 44 42 38 46 39 36 45 45 38

30 59 43

138

38 34 45 48 46 31 50

46 31 66

49 33 32

45 40

46 40

48 45 49 51 43 52 47 46 58 52 62

39 60 52 53

41 35 51 59 56 47 47

45 31 64

49 33 31

40 39

46 39

53 48 51 58 51 52 49 41 64 51 64

52 41 45 53

41 35 44

(NA) (NA)

42 47

(NA) Not available. 1 Seasonally adjusted price as percentage of parity price. 2 Wholesale extracted. Adjusted base price derived from state annual averages prices weighted by production. For 1982 through 1985 the national

averages are the support prices. 3 Equivalent packinghouse-door returns for California, New York (apples only), Oregon (except peaches), and Washington. Price at point of first

sale for other states.

Page 31: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

Agricultural Prices (September 2011) 31 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Commodity Parity Prices – United States: September 2011 with Comparisons [Parity prices are computed under the provisions of Title III, Subtitle a, Section 301 (a) of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938 as amended by the Agricultural Acts of 1948, 1949, and 1956. See January Agricultural Prices for details on adjusted base price and parity price computations]

Commodity and unit Adjusted

base price

Parity price

September 2010

August 2011

September 2011

(dollars) (dollars) (dollars) (dollars)

Field crops and miscellaneous Hops ........................................................................ pound Mustard seed ............................................................... cwt Rapeseed .................................................................... cwt Rye ......................................................................... bushel Safflower ..................................................................... cwt Spearmint oil ............................................................ pound Sweetpotatoes ............................................................. cwt Tobacco Flue-cured, 11-14 ................................................ pound Fire-cured, 21-23 ................................................. pound Burley, 31 ............................................................ pound Maryland, 32 ........................................................ pound Dark air-cured, 35-37 ........................................... pound Pennsylvania seedleaf, 41 ................................... pound Cigar binder, 51 ................................................... pound Noncitrus fruit Apples, processing 1 ..................................................... ton Apricots Fresh 2 ...................................................................... ton Dried (California) ....................................................... ton Avocados 2 ................................................................... ton Cherries Sweet ....................................................................... ton Tart ...................................................................... pound Cranberry 3 ............................................................... barrel Dates 2 (California) ........................................................ ton Grapes Raisin variety ............................................................ ton Other dried ................................................................ ton Kiwifruit ......................................................................... ton Nectarines, fresh 2 (California) ...................................... ton Olives, canning 3 (California) ......................................... ton

0.307 2.66 2.14

0.492 1.94 1.44 2.27

0.208 0.293 0.214 0.183 0.261 0.191 0.675

16.10

114.00 262.00 198.00

210.00 0.034 4.89

183.00

117.00 65.40 94.40 55.30 87.40

7.31

63.10 49.70 11.60 47.50 34.60 55.30

5.27 7.27 5.53 4.53 6.53 4.73

15.90

407.00

2,630.00 6,170.00 5,140.00

5,000.00

0.853 116.00

4,800.00

2,680.00 1,620.00 2,320.00 1,350.00 2,310.00

8.34

72.20 58.10 13.40 52.70 39.10 61.70

5.65 7.96 5.81 4.97 7.09 5.19

18.30

437.00

3,100.00 7,120.00 5,380.00

5,700.00

0.923 133.00

4,970.00

3,180.00 1,780.00 2,560.00 1,500.00 2,370.00

8.38

72.60 58.40 13.40 53.00 39.30 62.00

5.68 8.00 5.84 5.00 7.13 5.21

18.40

440.00

3,110.00 7,150.00 5,410.00

5,730.00

0.928 133.00

5,000.00

3,190.00 1,790.00 2,580.00 1,510.00 2,390.00

See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued

Page 32: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

32 Agricultural Prices (September 2011) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Commodity Parity Prices – United States: September 2011 with Comparisons (continued) [Parity prices are computed under the provisions of Title III, Subtitle a, Section 301 (a) of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938 as amended by the Agricultural Acts of 1948, 1949, and 1956. See January Agricultural Prices for details on adjusted base price and parity price computations]

Commodity and unit Adjusted

base price

Parity price

September 2010

August 2011

September 2011

(dollars) (dollars) (dollars) (dollars)

Noncitrus fruit - continued Papayas (Hawaii) ....................................................... pound Peaches Fresh 4 ........................................................................ ton Dried (California) ......................................................... ton Processing, excludes dried Clingstone 3 (California) ......................................... ton Pears Fresh 4 ........................................................................ ton Dried 1 (California) ....................................................... ton Plums (California) Fresh, equivalent on-tree ............................................ ton Prunes, dried 1 (California) .............................................. ton Prunes and plums Fresh, excludes California 5 ......................................... ton Processing, excludes dried 1 ....................................... ton Tree nuts 6 Almonds ..................................................................... pound Hazelnuts ........................................................................ ton Pistachios .................................................................. pound Walnuts ........................................................................... ton Vegetables, fresh 7 Carrots 8 .......................................................................... cwt Cauliflower 8 .................................................................... cwt Celery 8 ........................................................................... cwt Honeydew melons ........................................................... cwt Lettuce ............................................................................ cwt Onions 8 .......................................................................... cwt Tomatoes ........................................................................ cwt

0.046

83.00 57.30

33.70

55.60 178.00

60.20

147.00

63.80 25.70

0.209 183.00 0.194

177.00

2.61 4.26 2.05 2.17 2.35 1.57 4.75

1.12

2,020.00 1,580.00

822.00

1,340.00 4,220.00

1,480.00 3,560.00

1,540.00

646.00

4.92 4,170.00

4.63 4,190.00

61.90 105.00 51.00 56.30 57.30 37.10

114.00

1.12

2,020.00 1,580.00

818.00

1,330.00 4,200.00

1,480.00 3,540.00

1,530.00

643.00

4.90 4,150.00

4.61 4,180.00

61.70 105.00 50.70 56.10 57.10 36.90

114.00

1.26

2,270.00 1,560.00

920.00

1,520.00 4,860.00

1,640.00 4,010.00

1,740.00

702.00

5.71 5,000.00

5.30 4,830.00

71.30 116.00 56.00 59.20 64.20 42.90

130.00 1 Equivalent returns at processing plant door. 2 Equivalent returns at packinghouse door. 3 Equivalent returns for bulk fruit at first delivery point. 4 Equivalent packinghouse-door returns for California, New York (apples only), Oregon (except peaches), and Washington. Price at point of first sale

for other states. 5 Based on "as sold" prices for fresh fruit in all states. 6 Prices In-Shell basis except almonds which are shelled basis. 7 FOB shipping point prices. 8 Includes some processing.

Page 33: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

Agricultural Prices (September 2011) 33 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Marketing Year for Specified Commodities Corn for grain: September 1 to August 31 for United States, Arizona, California, Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Missouri, Nebraska, New Mexico, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Virginia, and West Virginia; July 1 to June 30 for Texas; August 1 to July 31 for Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Tennessee; October 1 to September 30 for Colorado, Connecticut, Idaho, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Dakota, Oregon, Rhode Island, Utah, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. Sorghum for grain: September 1 to August 31 for United States, Arizona, California, Colorado, Illinois, Kansas, Kentucky, Missouri, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and South Dakota; June 1 to May 31 for Texas; August 1 to July 31 for Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Tennessee.

Soybeans: September 1 to August 31 for United States and all States except Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas; July 1 to June 30 for Texas; August 1 to July 31 for Louisiana and Mississippi. Austrian Winter Peas: July 1 to June 30 for United States, Idaho, Montana, and Oregon. Dry Edible Peas: July 1 to June 30 for United States, Idaho, Montana, North Dakota, Oregon, and Washington. Lentils: July 1to June 30 for United States, Idaho, Montana, North Dakota, and Washington.

Page 34: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

34 Agricultural Prices (September 2011) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Dry Edible Peas Market Year Average Prices Received – States and United States: Marketing Years 2008 through 2010 [Excludes both wrinkled seed peas and Austrian winter peas. See "Marketing Year for Specified Commodities" for State and United States marketing year months as defined on page 33 of this report]

State 2008 2009 2010

(dollars) (dollars) (dollars)

Idaho ....................................... Montana .................................. North Dakota ........................... Oregon .................................... Washington ............................. United States ..........................

15.40 14.50 13.00 18.30 14.40

13.40

10.40 8.46 8.44

17.50 11.30

8.98

11.10 9.13 9.47

20.70 11.50

9.77

Austrian Winter Peas Market Year Average Prices Received – States and United States: Marketing Years 2008 through 2010 [See "Marketing Year for Specified Commodities" for State and United States marketing year months as defined on page 33 of this report]

State 2008 2009 2010

(dollars) (dollars) (dollars)

Idaho ....................................... Montana .................................. Oregon .................................... United States ..........................

22.40 21.70 21.80

22.40

23.40 21.70 21.80

22.70

17.70 15.50 20.40

17.10

Lentils Market Year Average Prices Received – States and United States: Marketing Years 2008 through 2010 [See "Marketing Year for Specified Commodities" for State and United States marketing year months as defined on page 33 of this report]

State 2008 2009 2010

(dollars) (dollars) (dollars)

Idaho ....................................... Montana .................................. North Dakota ........................... Washington ............................. United States ..........................

33.20 34.90 33.10 34.10

33.80

26.80 27.20 26.60 26.80

26.80

27.90 23.90 25.10 30.20

25.70

Page 35: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

Agricultural Prices (September 2011) 35 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Received and Farm Marketings for Lentils by Month – United States: Marketing Years 2008-2009 through 2010-2011 [Marketing year average (MYA) prices are weighted average prices for the United States marketing year of July - June. Monthly farm marketings, based on a sample survey, as percent of total used for calculating MYA prices. See "Marketing Year for Specified Commodities" for State and United States marketing year months as defined on page 33 of this report]

Month Prices received Farm marketing percentages

2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011

(dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (percent) (percent) (percent)

July ...................... August ................. September ........... October ............... November ............ December ............ January 1 ............. February .............. March .................. April ..................... May ..................... June .................... MYA ....................

32.70 31.10 36.30 37.40 38.10 34.40 30.50 30.00 30.80 31.30 30.80 31.50

33.80

33.50 27.00 25.60 25.40 25.90 27.10 27.60 29.60 28.60 28.70 29.40 26.30

26.80

27.00 21.30 23.30 25.00 25.60 26.80 28.40 29.20 29.70 28.70 29.50 26.00

25.70

2.3 11.1 17.8 10.5 10.9 11.8 10.0 4.7 8.0 7.4 1.9 3.6

100.0

0.8 5.5

14.4 18.7 13.4 16.6 11.1 5.9 6.6 4.0 1.4 1.6

100.0

1.0 11.9 21.6 11.5 11.5 9.4 7.9 7.7 7.1 5.9 2.1 2.4

100.0

1 Second year.

Prices Received and Farm Marketings for Dry Edible Peas by Month – United States: Marketing Years 2008-2009 through 2010-2011 [Marketing year average (MYA) prices are weighted average prices for the United States marketing year of July - June. Monthly farm marketings, based on a sample survey, as percent of total used for calculating MYA prices. See "Marketing Year for Specified Commodities" for State and United States marketing year months as defined on page 33 of this report]

Month Prices received Farm marketing percentages

2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011

(dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (percent) (percent) (percent)

July ...................... August ................. September ........... October ............... November ............ December ............ January 1 ............. February .............. March .................. April ..................... May ..................... June .................... MYA ....................

16.10 15.10 15.40 13.80 13.00 12.70 12.70 12.40 11.80 11.40 12.00 11.10

13.40

10.90 9.02 8.57 8.95 8.78 8.99 9.79 9.14 8.49 8.43 9.35 7.48

8.98

7.60 8.77 8.69 8.26 9.04

10.20 10.50 12.10 10.90 12.00 12.60 14.00

9.77

9.8 11.9 11.0 7.8 7.4 7.8

10.4 6.1

11.3 6.4 4.4 5.7

100.0

5.7 11.1 11.4 13.1 9.8

10.1 9.3 8.5 5.9 5.6 3.7 5.8

100.0

14.0 20.4 10.5 5.4 6.4 7.2 7.2 3.6 9.1 6.7 4.8 4.7

100.0

1 Second year.

Page 36: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

36 Agricultural Prices (September 2011) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Received and Farm Marketings for Austrian Winter Peas by Month – United States: Marketing Years 2008-2009 through 2010-2011 [Marketing year average (MYA) prices are weighted average prices for the United States marketing year of July - June. Monthly farm marketings, based on a sample survey, as percent of total used for calculating MYA prices. See "Marketing Year for Specified Commodities" for State and United States marketing year months as defined on page 33 of this report]

Month Prices received Farm marketing percentages

2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011

(dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (percent) (percent) (percent)

July ...................... August ................. September ........... October ................ November ............ December ............ January 1 .............. February .............. March ................... April ..................... May ...................... June ..................... MYA .....................

(S) (S)

20.80 24.00

(S) (S) (S) (S) (S) (S) (S) (S)

22.40

24.00 23.20 22.30 23.30 21.10 21.70 23.20

(S) (S)

19.40 (S) (S)

22.70

15.80 16.70 16.60 16.80 17.70

(S) (S)

20.00 (S)

18.50 19.00

(S)

17.10

0.3 2.7

50.7 29.9 3.4 5.6 0.9 1.8 4.7 (S) (S) (S)

100.0

5.1 24.3 27.1 30.6 4.4 2.0 2.2 (S) (S) 1.1 (S) (S)

100.0

2.2 19.8 28.3 34.1 4.3 (S) (S) 6.5 (S) 0.4 1.2 (S)

100.0

(S) Insufficient number of reports to establish an estimate. 1 Second year.

Prices Received and Farm Marketings for Corn by Month – United States: Marketing Years 2008-2009 through 2010-2011 [Marketing year average (MYA) prices are weighted average prices for the United States marketing year of September - August. Monthly farm marketings, based on a sample survey, as percent of total used for calculating MYA prices. See "Marketing Year for Specified Commodities" for State and United States marketing year months as defined on page 33 of this report]

Month Prices received Farm marketing percentages

2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011

(dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel) (percent) (percent) (percent)

September ........... October ................ November ............ December ............ January 1 .............. February .............. March ................... April ..................... May ...................... June ..................... July ...................... August ................. MYA .....................

5.01 4.37 4.26 4.11 4.36 3.87 3.85 3.85 3.96 4.01 3.60 3.33

4.06

3.25 3.61 3.65 3.60 3.66 3.55 3.55 3.41 3.48 3.41 3.49 3.65

3.55

4.08 4.32 4.55 4.82 4.94 5.65 5.53 6.36 6.32 6.38 6.33 6.88

5.18

4.5 9.4

11.9 8.9

12.8 6.4 9.6 6.7 9.1 7.4 6.9 6.4

100.0

5.4 6.9

14.3 11.3 11.3 6.7 7.2 7.1 6.4 6.8 8.9 7.7

100.0

10.7 16.7 8.5 8.2

15.7 6.8 7.4 5.9 4.7 5.3 5.5 4.6

100.0

(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (S) Insufficient number of reports to establish an estimate. 1 Second year.

Page 37: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

Agricultural Prices (September 2011) 37 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Market Year Average Prices Received for Sorghum Grain – States and United States: Marketing Years 2008 through 2010 [See "Marketing Year for Specified Commodities" for State and United States marketing year months as defined on page 33 of this report]

State 2008 2009 2010

(dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt)

Arizona ............................................ Arkansas ......................................... Colorado .......................................... Georgia ........................................... Illinois .............................................. Kansas ............................................ Louisiana ......................................... Mississippi ....................................... Missouri ........................................... Nebraska ......................................... New Mexico ..................................... Oklahoma ........................................ South Dakota ................................... Texas .............................................. United States ...................................

9.40 6.93 5.90 6.10 5.29 5.61 6.90 6.00 6.38 5.80

6.25 5.89 5.62 6.91

5.72

6.20 5.77 5.28 5.70 6.86 5.47 5.70 4.72 5.86 5.62

6.12 5.68 4.88 6.00

5.75

9.10 7.14 9.00 6.65

10.40 9.00 6.90 7.02

10.20 8.74

9.60 9.00 8.56 7.26

8.96

Percent of Sorghum Grain Farm Marketings by Month – States and United States: Marketing Years 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 [Monthly farm marketings, based on a sample survey, as a percent of total used for calculating marketing year average prices. Blank cells indicate month is outside State's designated marketing year as defined on page 33 of this report]

State and Marketing

Year Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug

(%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%)

Arkansas 2009-2010 ................................................ 2010-2011 ................................................ Illinois 2009-2010 ................................................ 2010-2011 ................................................ Kansas 2009-2010 ................................................ 2010-2011 ................................................ Louisiana 2009-2010 ................................................ 2010-2011 ................................................ Missouri 2009-2010 ................................................ 2010-2011 ................................................ Nebraska 2009-2010 ................................................ 2010-2011 ................................................ Oklahoma 2009-2010 ................................................ 2010-2011 ................................................ Texas 2009-2010 ................................................ 2010-2011 ................................................ United States 2009-2010 ................................................ 2010-2011 ................................................

3 3

14 23

21 70

41 86

1 6

12 18

25 26

3

15

3 5

21 3

2 11

3 4

2 15

24 6

7.6 7.0

37 1

4 23

4

29

16 1

5 7

3 31

4

15

8 24

5.1 28.0

11 1

21 10

25 17

2 2

32 13

29 21

23 11

14 8

19.7 13.8

1 1

7 4

20 19

2 2

11 7

17 10

31 17

10 10

15.4 15.5

1 1

8 9

12 11

3 3

17 5

10 16

16 17

7 4

9.3 8.7

- -

9 3

7 5

1 -

13 5

5 3

8 5

2 1

5.0 4.0

3 -

23 6

5 3

- -

- 5

8 3

4 3

2 1

4.2 2.7

1 -

4 8

8 4

1 -

1 28

5 4

3 5

2 1

5.2 2.9

- -

6 10

6 3

1 -

4 4

4 3

4 3

2 1

4.1 2.2

- -

4 3

3 2

- -

- 10

5 3

2 2

3.1 5.7

- -

6 4

4 1

12 3

11 4

6 1

2 1

11.2 4.8

5 5

3 1

4 1

5 1

10.1 4.7

- Represents zero.

Page 38: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

38 Agricultural Prices (September 2011) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Received for Sorghum Grain by Month – States and United States: Marketing Years 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 [See "Marketing Year for Specified Commodities" for State and United States marketing year months as defined on page 33 of this report]

State 2009-2010

June July August September October November December January 1

(dollars per cwt)

(dollars per cwt)

(dollars per cwt)

(dollars per cwt)

(dollars per cwt)

(dollars per cwt)

(dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt)

Arkansas .................... Illinois ......................... Kansas ....................... Louisiana ................... Missouri ..................... Nebraska ................... Oklahoma .................. Texas ......................... United States .............

(D) (D)

6.09 (D)

6.84 6.18 7.09 6.64

6.29

(S) (D)

4.65 (D)

5.74 4.95 4.70 5.44

5.19

5.71 (D)

4.83 5.48 5.21 5.04 4.47 5.64

5.36

(D) (D)

4.74 5.49 4.47 4.86 4.66 5.95

5.63

(D) (D)

5.29 5.50 (D)

5.53 5.27 5.87

5.54

6.45 6.36 5.51 (D)

5.95 5.72 5.74 6.30

5.67

(D) 6.81 5.58 (D)

5.95 5.68 5.92 6.29

5.71

(D) 6.92 5.67 5.76 5.84 5.74 5.95 6.54

5.84

State 2010-2011

June July August September October November December January 1

(dollars per cwt)

(dollars per cwt)

(dollars per cwt)

(dollars per cwt)

(dollars per cwt)

(dollars per cwt)

(dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt)

Arkansas .................... Illinois ......................... Kansas ....................... Louisiana ................... Missouri ..................... Nebraska ................... Oklahoma .................. Texas ......................... United States .............

(S) (D)

5.02 (D) (S)

5.38 5.03 5.85

5.38

(S) (D)

5.42 (D)

5.45 5.35 5.39 6.14

5.97

6.94 6.66 5.92 6.74 5.78 5.96 6.41 6.35

6.36

7.61 7.35 7.16 7.76 7.10 6.59 7.43 7.33

7.26

(D) 9.55 8.00 (D)

7.90 7.77 8.34 7.41

7.80

(D) 9.26 8.36 (D)

8.18 8.21 8.66 8.67

8.44

(D) 10.80 8.98 (D)

9.02 8.86 8.99 8.24

8.79

(D) 10.70 9.61 (D)

9.00 8.99 9.52 9.16

9.49

See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued

Page 39: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

Agricultural Prices (September 2011) 39 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Received for Sorghum Grain by Month – States and United States: Marketing Years 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 (continued) [See "Marketing Year for Specified Commodities" for State and United States marketing year months as defined on page 33 of this report]

State 2009-2010

February March April May June July August

(dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt)

Arkansas ..................... Illinois .......................... Kansas ........................ Louisiana ..................... Missouri ....................... Nebraska ..................... Oklahoma .................... Texas .......................... United States ...............

(S) 7.44 5.30 (D)

6.29 5.55 5.48 6.13

5.44

4.36 (D)

5.53 (S) (S)

5.66 5.40 5.79

5.68

(D) 6.94 5.28 (D)

5.50 5.36 5.05 6.39

5.39

(S) (D)

5.55 (D)

5.40 5.38 5.26 6.91

5.69

(S) (D)

5.02 (D) (S)

5.38 5.03 5.85

5.38

(S) (D)

5.42 (D)

5.45 5.35 5.39 6.14

5.97

6.94 6.66 5.92 6.74 5.78 5.96 6.41 6.35

6.36

State 2010-2011

February March April May June July August

(dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) (dollars per cwt) Arkansas ..................... Illinois .......................... Kansas ........................ Louisiana ..................... Missouri ....................... Nebraska ..................... Oklahoma .................... Texas .......................... United States ...............

(S) 12.40 10.80

(D) 11.40 10.60 10.80 11.00

10.90

(S) 10.50 10.80

(S) (D)

10.30 10.90 9.75

10.60

(S) (D)

11.60 (S) (D)

11.60 11.80 12.20

11.70

(S) 12.40 11.50

(D) (D)

11.10 11.70 11.60

11.60

(S) 11.60 12.00

(S) (D)

12.30 12.30 10.00

10.50

(S) 12.20 11.60

(D) 12.10 12.40 11.10 10.30

10.40

10.90 (D)

12.20 10.10

(D) 11.70 11.80 10.60

10.70

(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. (S) Insufficient number of reports to establish an estimate. 1 Second year.

Page 40: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

40 Agricultural Prices (September 2011) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Soybean Market Year Average Prices Received – States and United States: Marketing Years 2008 through 2010 [See "Marketing Year for Specified Commodities" for State and United States marketing year months as defined on page 33 of this report]

State 2008 2009 2010

(dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel)

Alabama ......................................... Arkansas ......................................... Delaware ........................................ Florida ............................................. Georgia ........................................... Illinois .............................................. Indiana ............................................ Iowa ................................................ Kansas ............................................ Kentucky ......................................... Louisiana ........................................ Maryland ......................................... Michigan ......................................... Minnesota ....................................... Mississippi ...................................... Missouri .......................................... Nebraska ........................................ New Jersey ..................................... New York ........................................ North Carolina ................................. North Dakota ................................... Ohio ................................................ Oklahoma ....................................... Pennsylvania .................................. South Carolina ................................ South Dakota .................................. Tennessee ...................................... Texas .............................................. Virginia ............................................ West Virginia ................................... Wisconsin ....................................... United States ..................................

10.30 9.64 9.40 8.50 9.50

10.20 10.20 10.20 9.39

10.00

9.52 9.20 9.82

10.10 9.29 9.74 9.79 9.75

10.30 9.33

9.71

10.30 9.10

10.20 9.00 9.65 9.45 9.25 9.10 9.75 9.80

9.97

10.00 9.66 9.60 9.50 9.80 9.80 9.80 9.52 9.38 9.90

9.66 9.50 9.54 9.39 9.24 9.61 9.48 9.37 9.10 9.59

9.26 9.78 9.40 9.40 9.50 9.18 9.74 9.25 9.40 9.60 9.62

9.59

11.10 10.90 12.20 11.00 11.70 11.80 11.50 11.20 11.50 11.40

10.50 12.00 11.10 10.90 10.40 11.70 11.00 11.70 11.40 12.00

10.90 11.50 11.40 12.10 11.80 10.90 11.10 10.40 12.00 12.00 10.80

11.30

Page 41: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

Agricultural Prices (September 2011) 41 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Received for Soybeans by Month – States and United States: Marketing Years 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 [See "Marketing Year for Specified Commodities" for State and United States marketing year months as defined on page 33 of this report]

State 2009-2010

August September October November December January 1 February

(dollars per bushel)

(dollars per bushel)

(dollars per bushel)

(dollars per bushel)

(dollars per bushel)

(dollars per bushel)

(dollars per bushel)

Arkansas .................... Illinois ......................... Indiana ....................... Iowa ............................ Kansas ....................... Kentucky ..................... Louisiana .................... Michigan ..................... Minnesota ................... Mississippi .................. Missouri ...................... Nebraska .................... North Carolina ............ North Dakota .............. Ohio ............................ South Dakota .............. Tennessee .................. Wisconsin ................... United States ..............

10.70 11.10 11.00 11.00 10.70 11.40 10.10 11.00 10.50 9.93

10.90 10.80 10.90 10.10 11.10 10.30 10.60 11.50

10.80

9.60 10.10 9.97 9.89 9.46 9.80 9.72

10.10 9.54 9.53

10.00 9.47 9.86 9.24 9.99 9.16 9.68 9.88

9.75

9.56 9.73 9.49 9.35 9.11 9.51 9.51 9.40 9.38 9.20

9.33 9.32 9.54 9.30 9.63 9.02 9.57 9.39

9.43

9.69 9.79 9.63 9.53 9.37 9.63 9.60 9.50 9.32 8.87

9.45 9.59 9.69 9.27 9.72 9.22 9.71 9.55

9.53

9.68 10.10 10.20 9.81 9.72

10.30 9.41 9.91 9.63 9.32

9.80 9.82 9.48 9.40 9.95 9.46 9.93

10.00

9.80

9.91 9.95

10.00 9.66 9.53

10.10 9.99 9.67 9.59 9.52

9.81 9.73 9.46 9.28 9.93 9.15 9.96 9.86

9.79

9.00 9.44 9.82 9.30 9.17

10.00 9.44 9.50 9.16 8.96

9.47 9.21 9.49 9.23 9.87 9.22 9.47 9.59

9.41

State 2010-2011

August September October November December January 1 February

(dollars per bushel)

(dollars per bushel)

(dollars per bushel)

(dollars per bushel)

(dollars per bushel)

(dollars per bushel)

(dollars per bushel)

Arkansas .................... Illinois ......................... Indiana ....................... Iowa ............................ Kansas ....................... Kentucky ..................... Louisiana .................... Michigan ..................... Minnesota ................... Mississippi .................. Missouri ...................... Nebraska .................... North Carolina ............ North Dakota .............. Ohio ............................ South Dakota .............. Tennessee .................. Wisconsin ................... United States ..............

10.10 10.30 10.50 10.00 10.20 10.00 9.75

10.20 9.87 9.68

10.20 9.93

10.80 9.58

10.70 9.59

10.20 10.20

10.10

10.10 10.00 10.10 9.87 9.82 9.79

10.10 9.71 9.48

10.10

10.10 9.71

11.00 9.50

10.20 9.64

10.30 9.80

9.98

10.80 10.80 10.60 9.98

10.50 10.70 10.80 10.30 9.69

10.30

10.50 9.98

10.90 9.83

10.60 9.88

10.80 10.20

10.20

11.40 11.10 11.50 10.90 11.50 11.40 12.10 11.40 10.50 10.80

11.30 10.90 11.20 10.50 11.60 10.60 11.60 10.80

11.10

11.50 11.90 12.20 11.60 12.20 11.40 10.30 11.90 11.30 10.50

11.80 11.80 11.80 10.70 12.10 11.10 11.50 11.60

11.60

11.20 11.70 11.70 11.80 12.60 11.50 10.90 11.80 11.20 11.70

11.60 11.40 12.10 10.90 11.90 11.30 11.10 11.50

11.60

12.80 12.90 13.00 12.60 13.20 12.60 12.50 12.30 12.10 12.30

12.40 12.40 13.30 12.50 12.60 12.60 12.80 12.90

12.70

See footnote(s) at end of table. --continued

Page 42: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

42 Agricultural Prices (September 2011) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Received for Soybeans by Month – States and United States: Marketing Years 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 (continued) [See "Marketing Year for Specified Commodities" for State and United States marketing year months as defined on page 33 of this report]

State 2009-2010

March April May June July August

(dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel)

Arkansas ....................... Illinois ............................ Indiana .......................... Iowa .............................. Kansas .......................... Kentucky ....................... Louisiana ...................... Michigan ....................... Minnesota ..................... Mississippi .................... Missouri ........................ Nebraska ...................... North Carolina ............... North Dakota ................. Ohio .............................. South Dakota ................ Tennessee .................... Wisconsin ..................... United States ................

9.25 9.52 9.70 9.27 9.24 9.66 (D)

9.40 9.08 8.88

9.44 9.22 9.55 9.05 9.73 9.00 9.43 9.33

9.39

9.18 9.58 9.79 9.33 9.39 9.76 9.32 9.51 9.23 8.85

9.59 9.33 9.64 9.04 9.68 9.18 9.52 9.55

9.47

9.25 9.43 9.77 9.35 9.35 9.61 9.06 9.54 9.15 8.75

9.48 9.27 9.66 9.06 9.50 9.19 9.55 9.85

9.41

8.98 9.60 9.79 9.39 9.28 9.62 7.68 9.49 9.10 8.56

9.56 9.31 9.59 9.17 9.82 9.03 9.63 9.42

9.45

9.71 10.00 10.10 9.69 9.83

10.00 9.90 9.80 9.41 (D)

9.87 9.46

10.40 9.25

10.20 9.25 9.96 9.98

9.79

10.10 10.30 10.50 10.00 10.20 10.00 9.75

10.20 9.87 9.68

10.20 9.93

10.80 9.58

10.70 9.59

10.20 10.20

10.10

State 2010-2011

March April May June July August

(dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel) (dollars per bushel)

Arkansas ....................... Illinois ............................ Indiana .......................... Iowa .............................. Kansas .......................... Kentucky ....................... Louisiana ...................... Michigan ....................... Minnesota ..................... Mississippi .................... Missouri ........................ Nebraska ...................... North Carolina ............... North Dakota ................. Ohio .............................. South Dakota ................ Tennessee .................... Wisconsin ..................... United States ................

12.50 13.10 12.80 12.40 12.90 13.00 13.30 12.20 12.50 13.20

12.60 12.60 13.20 12.50 12.90 12.50 12.80 12.00

12.70

13.10 13.40 13.30 12.90 13.20 13.60 12.00 12.70 12.50 13.10

13.50 12.90 13.50 12.40 12.90 12.70 13.50 12.40

13.10

12.00 13.40 13.70 13.20 13.50 13.60 12.80 12.60 12.70 12.90

13.60 13.10 13.80 12.50 13.50 12.90 13.60 12.60

13.20

12.80 13.50 13.40 13.20 13.70 13.80 12.50 13.10 12.80 13.30

13.60 13.00 14.00 12.70 13.40 12.90 13.30 12.40

13.20

13.80 13.40 13.70 13.00 13.40 13.70 12.30 13.20 12.80

(D)

13.50 13.10 14.00 12.80 13.50 12.80 13.40 12.90

13.20

13.20 13.70 13.70 13.50 13.50 13.50 11.80 13.30 13.00 13.60

13.70 13.30 14.00 12.80 13.60 13.00 13.00 13.40

13.40

(D) Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual operations. 1 Second year.

Page 43: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

Agricultural Prices (September 2011) 43 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Percent of Soybean Farm Marketings by Month – States and United States: Marketing Years 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 [Monthly farm marketings, based on a sample survey, as a percent of total used for calculating marketing year average prices. Blank cells indicate month is outside State's designated marketing year as defined on page 33 of this report]

State and Marketing

Year Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug

(%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%)

Arkansas 2009-2010 .................................................. 2010-2011 .................................................. Illinois 2009-2010 .................................................. 2010-2011 .................................................. Indiana 2009-2010 .................................................. 2010-2011 .................................................. Iowa 2009-2010 .................................................. 2010-2011 .................................................. Kansas 2009-2010 .................................................. 2010-2011 .................................................. Kentucky 2009-2010 .................................................. 2010-2011 .................................................. Louisiana 2009-2010 .................................................. 2010-2011 .................................................. Michigan 2009-2010 .................................................. 2010-2011 .................................................. Minnesota 2009-2010 .................................................. 2010-2011 .................................................. Mississippi 2009-2010 .................................................. 2010-2011 .................................................. Missouri 2009-2010 .................................................. 2010-2011 .................................................. Nebraska 2009-2010 .................................................. 2010-2011 .................................................. North Carolina 2009-2010 .................................................. 2010-2011 .................................................. North Dakota 2009-2010 .................................................. 2010-2011 .................................................. Ohio 2009-2010 .................................................. 2010-2011 .................................................. South Dakota 2009-2010 .................................................. 2010-2011 .................................................. Tennessee 2009-2010 .................................................. 2010-2011 .................................................. Wisconsin 2009-2010 .................................................. 2010-2011 .................................................. United States 2009-2010 .................................................. 2010-2011 ..................................................

5 13

3 10

8

38

3 8

6 28

5 7

3 5

1 5

33 30

1

13

5 7

13 32

2 3

5 9

2 3

1 4

2 20

3 4

3 21

1 9

4.1 11.0

19 21

14 20

23 18

17 39

23 36

15 32

23 31

33 41

17 35

17 18

13 28

33 33

5 11

11 34

36 29

21 46

18 39

18 53

20.3 30.6

35 14

15 5

14 3

19 6

23 21

18 6

10 5

24 8

18 8

21 5

24 11

18 8

15 27

27 9

14 6

33 6

38 8

35 6

19.6 7.4

18 12

7

12

6 6

7 6

13 13

12 9

13 13

7 6

12 9

23 24

8

10

12 7

23 20

15 9

7 7

8 8

15 6

5 4

9.7 9.2

9 9

19 26

18 18

12 14

13 8

35 28

11 7

11 11

12 14

13 6

21 17

10 24

25 17

17 17

13 13

8

12

14 16

16 11

14.8 17.2

1 1

8 8

6 7

7 5

7 4

7 9

2 1

5 5

5 5

3 2

6 5

5 5

9 7

8 5

5 5

5 5

3 3

3 2

6.0 5.5

2 1

7 5

8 5

8 6

6 3

4 4

1 -

4 4

6 4

2 1

7 5

5 3

6 5

9 4

7 6

5 3

2 1

5 3

6.2 4.4

1 1

5 3

5 3

6 3

4 2

3 2

- -

4 3

4 3

2 -

6 6

3 2

4 3

3 2

4 3

4 2

1 1

5 3

4.4 2.9

1 1

4 3

3 3

3 3

2 3

1 2

- -

2 2

3 4

1 1

2 3

1 2

3 2

2 1

2 2

2 2

1 1

2 3

2.6 2.8

1 -

7 4

4 3

5 4

2 2

1 1

1 -

4 3

7 4

1 -

3 4

3 2

3 2

3 5

4 3

3 4

1 1

4 2

4.2 3.1

1 1

7 3

4 3

7 4

3 1

2 1

1 -

3 2

7 4

1 1

5 3

3 2

3 2

3 7

4 3

5 5

2 2

4 2

4.7 3.0

4 1

4 3

3 3

4 3

1 2

1 1

2 2

4 3

3 5

2 3

2 1

1 3

2 3

3 3

2 1

2 2

3.4 2.9

- Represents zero.

Page 44: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

44 Agricultural Prices (September 2011) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Reliability of Prices Received Estimates Definition: Prices received represent sales from producers to first buyers. They include all grades and qualities. The average commodity price from the survey multiplied by the total quantity marketed theoretically should give the total cash receipts for the commodity. Survey procedures: Primary sales data used to determine grain prices were obtained from probability samples of about 1900 mills and elevators. These procedures ensure that virtually all grain moving into commercial channels has a chance of being included in the survey. Generally, States surveyed account for 90 percent or more of total United States production. Livestock prices are obtained from packers, stockyards, auctions, dealers, and market check data from AMS-USDA, private marketing organizations, and state commodity groups and agencies. Inter-farm sales of grain and livestock are not included since they represent very small percentages of the total marketings. Grain marketed for seed is also excluded. Fruit and vegetable prices are obtained from sample surveys and market check data from AMS-USDA, private marketing organizations, state agencies, and universities. Summary and estimation procedures: Survey quantities sold are expanded by strata to state levels and used to weight average strata prices to a state average. State prices are then weighted to a United States price based on expanded marketings. Recommendations are prepared by the State Field Offices and reviewed by the Agricultural Statistics Board in Washington, D.C. State recommendations are reviewed for reasonableness with survey data, other States, and recent historic estimates. Revisions: For most items, the current month's preliminary price represents a 3-5 day period around the 15th of the month. Previous month's prices represent actual dollars received for quantities sold during the entire month. Revisions are published in monthly issues of Agricultural Prices. Reliability: United States price estimates based on probability surveys generally have a sampling error of less than one percent for the major commodities such as corn, wheat, soybeans, cotton, and rice. Current methods of summarization for non-probability commodities are not designed directly to calculate sampling errors. However, analytical measures approximate the United States relative sampling errors at around five percent. Any nonsampling errors are attributed to such things as the inability to obtain correct information, differences in interpreting questions or definitions, mistakes in coding or processing the data, etc. Efforts are made at each step in the survey process to minimize these nonsampling errors.

Page 45: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

Agricultural Prices (September 2011) 45 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Paid by Farmers The September Index of Prices Paid for Commodities and Services, Interest, Taxes, and Farm Wage Rates (PPITW) at 205 (1990-1992=100), unchanged from August 2011 but up 12 percent from September 2010. Production index: The September index, at 217, increased 0.5 percent from last month and 15 percent from last year. Higher prices in September for complete feeds, supplements, LP gas, and potash & phosphate more than offset lower prices for concentrates, feeder cattle, feed grains, and feeder pigs. Feed: The September index, at 238, increased 1.3 percent from August and 32 percent from last September. Since August, higher prices for complete feeds, supplements, and hay & forages more than offset lower prices for concentrates and feed grains. Livestock and poultry: The September index, at 146, decreased 0.7 percent from last month but increased 12 percent from last year. Since August, prices for feeder cattle and feeder pigs are lower. The September feeder cattle price, at $127.60 per cwt, is down 70 cents per cwt from the August price. September feeder pigs averaged $99.00 per cwt, down $4.00 per cwt from August. Fertilizer: The September index, at 331, is unchanged from August but 30 percent above September a year ago. Since August, higher prices for potash & phosphate offset lower prices for mixed fertilizer and nitrogen. Chemicals: The September index, at 145, is unchanged from August but 0.7 percent below last September. Compared with last month, prices are slightly higher for herbicides, insecticides, and fungicides/other. Fuels: The September index, at 368, is up 0.5 percent from a month earlier and 32 percent above September 2010. Compared with last month, prices are higher for LP gas and gasoline but lower for diesel. Machinery: The September index, at 241, is unchanged from August but 4.3 percent above last September. Compared with last month, prices are higher for self-propelled machinery and other machinery but unchanged for tractors. Consumer price index: The August 2011 Consumer Price Index, as issued by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, for all urban consumers (CPI-U) increased 0.3 percent before seasonal adjustment to a level of 226.545 (1982-1984=100). The July index is 225.922. For the 12 month period ending in August, the overall index increased 3.8 percent.

Page 46: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

46 Agricultural Prices (September 2011) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Paid Indexes and Related Parity Ratios – United States: September 2011 with Comparisons [Revised historical price indexes for months not shown are available at www.nass.usda.gov]

Indexes and

ratios

1910-1914 Base 1990-1992 Base

September 2010

August 2011

September 2011

September 2010

August 2011

September 2011

(percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent)

Prices paid by farmers for commodities, services, interest, taxes, and wage rates (PPITW) ......................................... Production ........................................... Feed ............................................... Livestock & poultry .......................... Seeds .............................................. Fertilizer .......................................... Chemicals ....................................... Fuels ............................................... Supplies & repairs ........................... Autos & trucks ................................. Machinery ....................................... Building materials ............................ Services & rent ................................ Services .......................................... Rent ................................................ Interest 1 ............................................. Taxes 2 ................................................ Wage rates ......................................... Production, interest, taxes, and wage rates (PITW) ................... Family living-CPI 3 ...............................

2432 1827 881

1662 3082 935 903

2152 1140

2980 5802 2251 2046 (NA) (NA)

3389 5549 6972

2506 2075

2723 2098 1147 1875 3327 1212 898

2827 1187

3074 6050 2348 2140 (NA) (NA)

3646 6032 7043

2837 2152

2730 2104 1164 1863 3327 1214 898

2839 1191

3064 6052 2349 2141 (NA) (NA)

3646 6032 7043

2845 2158

183 188 180 130 311 255 146 279 161

112 231 166

(NA) 162 191

135 207 186

187 162

205 216 235 147 336 331 145 366 167

116 241 173

(NA) 168 203

145 225 188

211 168

205 217 238 146 336 331 145 368 168

115 241 173

(NA) 168 203

145 225 188

212 169

Ratio (received/paid) ........................... Parity ratio 4 ........................................ Parity ratio adjusted 5 .......................... PPITW adjusted for productivity 6 ....................................

(NA) 37 39

1399

(NA) 43 44

1463

(NA) 42 44

1465

78 (NA) (NA)

(NA)

90 (NA) (NA)

(NA)

89 (NA) (NA)

(NA)

Crop sector (PPITW) ........................... Livestock sector (PPITW) ....................

(NA) (NA)

(NA) (NA)

(NA) (NA)

194 172

214 195

214 196

Farm sector (production) ..................... Non-farm sector (production) ...............

(NA) (NA)

(NA) (NA)

(NA) (NA)

184 191

221 213

223 214

(NA) Not available. 1 Interest per acre on farm real estate debt and interest rate on farm non-real estate debt. 2 Farm real estate taxes payable per acre. 3 Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers (CPI-U), for the previous month converted by the USDA. 4 Ratio of index of prices received to PPITW (1910-1914=100). 5 Based on estimated cash receipts, from marketings and government payments, the preliminary adjustment factor is 1.044 for 2011 and the

revised factor is 1.041 for 2010. 6 PPITW is adjusted based on productivity trend for the prior 15 years.

Page 47: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

Agricultural Prices (September 2011) 47 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Prices Paid Indexes and Annual Weights for Input Components and Sub-Components – United States: September 2011 with Comparisons [Revised historical price indexes for months not shown are available at www.nass.usda.gov. Relative weights are a five year moving average]

Relative weights Indexes (1990-1992=100)

2010 2011 September 2010

August 2011

September 2011

(percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent)

Production items ................................................... Feed ................................................................. Feed grains ................................................... Complete feeds ............................................. Hay & forages ............................................... Concentrates ................................................ Supplements ................................................. Livestock & poultry ............................................ Feeder cattle ................................................. Feeder pigs ................................................... Milk cow replacements .................................. Poultry .......................................................... Seeds ............................................................... Field crops .................................................... Grasses & legumes ....................................... Fertilizer ............................................................ Mixed fertilizer ............................................... Nitrogen ........................................................ Potash & phosphate ...................................... Chemicals ......................................................... Herbicides ..................................................... Insecticides ................................................... Fungicides & other ........................................ Fuels ................................................................ Diesel ........................................................... Gasoline ....................................................... LP gas .......................................................... Supplies & repairs ............................................. Supplies ........................................................ Repairs ......................................................... Autos & trucks .................................................. Autos ............................................................ Trucks ........................................................... Machinery ......................................................... Tractors ........................................................ Self-propelled ................................................ Other machinery ........................................... Building materials ............................................. Services ............................................................ Custom rates ................................................ Other services ............................................... Rent .................................................................. Cash ............................................................. Share ............................................................ Interest ................................................................. Taxes ................................................................... Wage rates ........................................................... Family living-CPI ...................................................

70.2

11.9 1.7 5.8 1.5 1.9 1.0 8.6 6.7 0.7 0.7 0.5

3.9 3.6 0.4 5.2 2.3 2.2 0.7 3.2 2.0 0.7 0.5

3.9 2.5 0.9 0.5 4.6 1.5 3.0 1.5 0.2 1.3

4.5 1.0 1.8 1.7 4.5

12.1 1.2

10.8

6.3 3.4 2.9 3.6 3.0 7.5

15.7

70.6

12.2 1.7 6.0 1.5 1.9 1.0 8.5 6.6 0.7 0.7 0.5

4.1 3.7 0.4 5.5 2.4 2.3 0.8 3.3 2.1 0.7 0.5

4.0 2.5 0.8 0.7 4.6 1.5 3.0 1.4 0.2 1.2

4.3 0.9 1.7 1.6 4.4

12.1 1.2

10.9

6.3 3.4 2.9 3.5 3.1 7.4

15.4

188

180 176 182 148 187 215 130 127 152 117 151

311 329 139 255 256 237 306 146 133 167 172

279 298 236 248 161 156 163 112 110 112

231 197 239 243 166 162 145 164

191 243 130 135 207 186 162

216

235 288 231 220 204 248 147 151 112 131 151

336 356 145 331 312 339 364 145 130 168 175

366 398 315 312 167 164 169 116 115 116

241 203 250 254 173 168 148 170

203 258 138 145 225 188 168

217

238 286 236 224 201 265 146 151 108 131 151

336 356 145 331 311 339 372 145 130 168 175

368 398 315 324 168 164 170 115 114 115

241 203 250 254 173 168 148 170

203 258 138 145 225 188 169

Page 48: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

48 Agricultural Prices (September 2011) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

100

120

140

160

180

200

220

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percent

Paid Indexes by Month,All Items and Production Items –United States: 1990-1992=100

All Items Production Items

30

80

130

180

230

280

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percent

Paid Indexes, Annual Averages,Production Items, Interest, Taxes, and Wages –United States: 1990-1992=100

Production Items Interest Taxes Wages

Page 49: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

Agricultural Prices (September 2011) 49 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

100

120

140

160

180

200

220

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percent

Paid Indexes by Farm Type and Month,All Items – United States: 1990-1992=100

All Farms Crop Farms Livestock Farms

90

110

130

150

170

190

210

230

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percent

Paid Indexes by Origin and Month,All Production Items –United States: 1990-1992=100

All Nonfarm Farm

Page 50: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

50 Agricultural Prices (September 2011) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

0

100

200

300

400

500

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percent

Paid Indexes by Non-Farm Sector and Month,Supplies & Repairs, Fertilizer, Machinery, andFuel – United States: 1990-1992=100

Supplies & Repairs FertilizerMachinery Fuel

50

100

150

200

250

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Percent

Paid Indexes by Month,Feed and Livestock & Poultry –United States: 1990-1992=100

Feed Livestock & Poultry

Page 51: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

Agricultural Prices (September 2011) 51 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Feed Price Ratios – United States: September 2011 with Comparisons

Feed price ratio 1 September 2010 August 2011 Preliminary September 2011

Broiler-feed: pounds of broiler grower feed equal in value to 1 pound of broiler, live weight 2 ....................................................... Market egg feed: pounds of laying feed equal in value to 1 dozen eggs 3 .................................................................................... Hog-corn: bushels of corn equal in value to 100 pounds of hog, live weight ......................................................................... Milk-feed: pounds of 16% mixed dairy feed equal in value to 1 pound of whole milk 4 ................................................................... Steer & heifer-corn: bushels of corn equal in value to 100 pounds of steer & heifers, live weight .................................................... Turkey-feed: pounds of turkey grower equal in value to 1 pound of turkey, live weight 5 ...........................................................

4.4

4.6

15.0

2.36

24.4

6.6

2.9

6.7

11.0

1.84

16.6

4.7

2.7

5.3

10.0

1.76

17.3

4.9 1 Effective January 1995, prices of commercial prepared feeds are based on current United States prices received for corn, soybeans, alfalfa hay, and

all wheat. 2 The price of commercial prepared broiler feed is based on current United States prices received for corn and soybeans. The modeled feed uses

58 percent corn and 42 percent soybeans. 3 The price of commercial prepared layer feed is based on current United States prices received for corn and soybeans. The modeled feed uses

75 percent corn and 25 percent soybeans. 4 The price of commercial prepared dairy feed is based on current United States prices received for corn, soybeans, and alfalfa hay. The modeled feed

uses 51 percent corn, 41 percent alfalfa hay, and 8 percent soybeans. 5 The price of commercial prepared turkey feed is based on current United States prices received for corn, soybeans, and wheat. The modeled feed

uses 51 percent corn, 28 percent soybeans, and 21 percent wheat.

Prices Received Used to Calculate Feed Price Ratios – United States: September 2011 with Comparisons [Price data source for livestock and poultry commodities is United States Department of Agriculture's Agricultural Marketing Service]

Item September 2010 August 2011 Preliminary September 2011

(dollars) (dollars) (dollars)

Broilers, live ........................................................... pound Eggs, market ......................................................... dozen Hogs, all .................................................................... cwt Milk, all ...................................................................... cwt Steers and heifers ..................................................... cwt Turkeys, live .......................................................... pound Corn ..................................................................... bushel Hay, alfalfa ................................................................. ton Soybeans ............................................................. bushel Wheat, all ............................................................. bushel

0.490 0.446

61.00 17.70

99.50 0.690

4.08

119.00

9.98 5.79

0.480 0.991

75.80 22.00

114.00 0.707

6.88

191.00

13.40 7.61

0.440 0.769

66.70 20.90

116.00 0.721

6.69

196.00

13.10 7.53

Prices Paid for Feeder Livestock – United States: September 2011 with Comparisons [Price data source is United States Department of Agriculture's Agricultural Marketing Service]

Item September 2010 August 2011 Preliminary September 2011

(dollars) (dollars) (dollars)

Feeder cattle & calves ............................................... cwt Feeder pigs ............................................................... cwt

107.90 140.00

128.30 103.00

127.60 99.00

Page 52: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

52 Agricultural Prices (September 2011) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Reliability of Prices Paid Estimates Definition: Prices paid by farmers represent the average costs of inputs purchased by farmers and ranchers to produce agricultural commodities. Conceptually, the average price when multiplied by quantity purchased should equal total producer expenditures for the item. Survey procedures: The prices paid data are obtained from establishments that sell goods and services to farmers and ranchers. Annually, about 8,500 firms are randomly selected from lists by type of item sold with an average response rate in the range of 75-80 percent. Firms are asked to report the price for the specified item "most commonly bought by farmers" or that was the "volume seller". Approximately 135 items are surveyed each March to represent all production input items purchased. The survey reference period for most items is the five business days centered around the 15th of the month. Separate prices paid surveys are conducted for agricultural chemicals, fuels, feed, fertilizer, machinery, and seed. Summary and estimation procedures: The annual March Prices Paid Survey is summarized as a nonprobability survey. Average prices reported are aggregated to the region and United States level using weights available from expenditure data and other administrative sources. Price recommendations are prepared by the State Field Offices and Headquarters for review by the Agricultural Statistics Board in Washington, D.C. Also, the change in price level for individual items surveyed are combined to the regional and United States levels, and are published as prices paid indexes referenced to a specific base period. Prices paid indexes for new autos and trucks, building materials, farm supplies, motor supplies, and marketing containers are updated based on price changes measured in selected Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) indexes. Revisions: Any revisions are published in the monthly and in annual issues of Agricultural Prices. The basis for revision must be supported by additional data that directly affect the level of the estimate. More revisions are likely for March when separate prices paid surveys are conducted, in lieu of BLS indexes, by the USDA to measure price change. Reliability: Current methods of summarization for the March data are not designed directly to calculate sampling errors. However, analytical measures approximate the United States relative sampling errors for major items around 10 percent. Any nonsampling errors are attributed to such things as the inability to obtain correct information, differences in interpreting questions or definitions, mistakes in coding or processing the data, etc. Efforts are made at each step in the survey process to minimize these nonsampling errors. Program change: Effective January 1, 1995, the National Agricultural Statistics Service updated the weights and changed the construction of its prices paid and received by farmers indexes. A Federal Register Notice dated October 28, 1994 discussed these program modifications. A 1990-1992 reference and base period replaced the 1977 reference and 1971-1973 base weight period. Five-year moving average weights replaced the current fixed 1971-1973 base period weights. The 1910-1914=100 price indexes, required by statute for computing parity prices, were linked forward based on the changes in the new 1990-1992=100 indexes. The new indexes were constructed by multiplying the ratios of the current prices to the base period prices by the moving average weights (adjusted for seasonal marketing patterns for the prices received indexes).

Page 53: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

Agricultural Prices (September 2011) 53 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Information Contacts Direct general questions to Kevin Barnes, Chief, Environmental, Economics and Demographics Branch at (202) 720-6146. Below are the commodity specialists to contact for additional information. Crop Prices Received Lance Honig, Chief, Crops Branch ................................................................................................................. (202) 720-2127 Jacqueline Moore, Head, Field Crops Section ................................................................................................. (202) 720-2127 Suzanne Avilla – Peanuts, Rice ..................................................................................................................... (202) 720-7688 Bryan Durham – Oats, Rye, Wheat ................................................................................................................ (202) 720-8068 Steve Maliszewski – Cotton, Cotton Ginnings, Sorghum .............................................................................. (202) 720-5944 Anthony Prillaman – Corn, Proso Millet, Flaxseed ....................................................................................... (202) 720-9526 Julie Schmidt – Crop Weather, Barley, Hay .................................................................................................. (202) 720-7621 Travis Thorson – Soybeans, Sunflower, Other Oilseeds ............................................................................... (202) 720-7369 Jorge Garcia-Pratts, Head, Fruits, Vegetables and Special Crops Section....................................................... (202) 720-2127 Debbie Flippin – Fresh and Processing Vegetables, Onions, Strawberries ................................................... (202) 720-2157 Fred Granja – Apples, Apricots, Cherries, Plums, Prunes, Tobacco ............................................................ (202) 720-4288 Erika White – Floriculture, Maple Syrup, Nursery, Tree Nuts ..................................................................... (202) 720-4215 Chris Hawthorn – Citrus, Coffee, Sugar Crops, Grapes, Tropical Fruits ...................................................... (202) 720-5412 Daphne Schauber – Berries, Cranberries, Potatoes, Sweet Potatoes ............................................................ (202) 720-4285 Dan Norris – Austrian Winter Peas, Dry Edible Peas, Lentils, Mints, Mushrooms, Peaches, Pears, Wrinkled Seed Peas, Dry Beans ................................................................... (202) 720-3250 Kim Ritchie – Hops ....................................................................................................................................... (360) 709-2400 Livestock Prices Received Dan Kerestes, Chief, Livestock Branch ........................................................................................................... (202) 720-3570 Scott Hollis, Head, Livestock Section ............................................................................................................. (202) 720-3570 Jason Hardegree - Cattle ................................................................................................................................ (202) 720-3040 Mike Miller - Milk, Milk Cows ..................................................................................................................... (202) 720-3278 Everett Olbert - Sheep, Lambs, Goats, Wool, Mohair ................................................................................... (202) 720-4751 Doug Bounds - Hogs ..................................................................................................................................... (202) 720-3106 Bruce Boess, Head, Poultry and Specialty Commodities Section ................................................................... (202) 720-3570 Cody Brokmeyer - Turkeys ........................................................................................................................... (202) 690-3237 Kim Linonis - Eggs ........................................................................................................................................ (202) 690-8632 Troy Marshall - Broilers, Honey .................................................................................................................... (202) 720-3244 Indexes, Prices Paid, and Parity Prices Kevin Barnes, Chief, Environmental, Economics and Demographics Branch ................................................................................................................................... (202) 720-6146 Kevin Hintzman, Head, Economics Section .................................................................................................... (202) 720-6146 Daryl Brinkman - Prices Received Indexes, Parity Prices ............................................................................. (202) 720-8844 Kevin Hintzman - Grazing Fees .................................................................................................................... (202) 720-6146 Vincent Davis - Prices Paid Indexes, Prices Paid for Feed, Fertilizer, Agricultural Chemicals, Seeds, Farm Supplies and Repairs, Farm Machinery, Fuels, Feeder Livestock, Poultry Chicks, Feed Price Ratios, Autos & Trucks ......................................................................................................... (202) 690-3229

Page 54: Agricultural Prices - Cornell University · 2018. 9. 16. · Released September 29, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United

Access to NASS Reports For your convenience, you may access NASS reports and products the following ways:

All reports are available electronically, at no cost, on the NASS web site: http://www.nass.usda.gov

Both national and state specific reports are available via a free e-mail subscription. To set-up this free

subscription, visit http://www.nass.usda.gov and in the “Receive NASS Updates” box under “Receive reports by Email,” click on “National” or “State” to select the reports you would like to receive.

Printed reports may be purchased from the National Technical Information Service (NTIS) by calling toll-free

(800) 999-6779, or (703) 605-6220 if calling from outside the United States or Canada. Accepted methods of payment are Visa, MasterCard, check, or money order.

For more information on NASS surveys and reports, call the NASS Agricultural Statistics Hotline at (800) 727-9540, 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. ET, or e-mail: [email protected]. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, political beliefs, genetic information, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Stop 9410, Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call toll-free at (866) 632-9992 (English) or (800) 877-8339 (TDD) or (866) 377-8642 (English Federal-relay) or (800) 845-6136 (Spanish Federal-relay). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.