15

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT€¦ · Ozone Study (CCOS). The study was guided by a policy committee comprised of staff from the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the California

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT€¦ · Ozone Study (CCOS). The study was guided by a policy committee comprised of staff from the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the California
Page 2: AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT€¦ · Ozone Study (CCOS). The study was guided by a policy committee comprised of staff from the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the California

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICTCOUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO

3433 Roberto CourtSan Luis Obispo, California 93401

Phone: (805) 781-5912Fax: (805) 781-1002

Burn Advisory (toll free): (800) 834-2876Email: [email protected]

World Wide Web Homepage: www.sloapcd.dst.ca.us

Air Pollution Control Officer: Robert W. Carr

Senior Staff

Technical Services: Paul Allen Enforcement: Karen BrooksPlanning: Larry Allen Engineering: David Dixon

Administrative Support: Kim Johnson

2000 Annual Air Quality Reportprepared by Jay Courtney

Technical Services Division

Published January 2002

Page 3: AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT€¦ · Ozone Study (CCOS). The study was guided by a policy committee comprised of staff from the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the California

The air qualitydatabase for SanLuis Obispo Countyis a public recordand is available fromthe APCD office invarious forms,includingcomprehensiverecords of all hourlyor other samplevalues acquiredanywhere in thecounty. Datasummaries arepublished in theAPCD quarterlynewsletter ClearVision, and in thisAnnual Air QualityReport. Ozonesummary dataappear weekly in theSaturday edition ofthe San Luis ObispoCounty TelegramTribune, a localnewspaper. Eachmonth data from allcountywidemonitoring is addedto separate archivesmaintained by thefederalEnvironmentalProtection Agency(EPA) and by theARB. Summarydata from San LuisObispo County canbe found in EPA andARB publicationsand on the District'swebsite at:

www.sloapcd.dst.ca.us.

2000 Air Quality SummaryMost populated areas of San Luis Obispo County enjoyed good airquality this year. In 2000 the state and federal ozone standards were notexceeded at any of the permanent ambient air monitoring stations. Stateand federal ozone standards were exceeded at three special study sitesassociated with the Central California Ozone Study (CCOS) described onpage 5. Countywide, exceedances of the state PM10 standard of 50ug/m3 occurred on 15 out of 60 different sample days in 2000. Both thePaso Robles and Atascadero monitoring stations recorded two statePM10 exceedances this year while the Ralcoa Way station on the NipomoMesa recorded fifteen exceedance days with a maximum value of 110.5ug/m3. There were no exceedances of the national air quality standard forPM10 in the county in 2000.

In San Luis Obispo County, ozone and PM10 are the pollutants of mainconcern, since exceedances of state health-based standards for thoseare experienced here in most years. For this reason our county isdesignated as a non-attainment area for both the state ozone and PM10standards.

Air Quality MonitoringSan Luis Obispo County air quality was measured in 2000 by a networkof ten permanent monitoring stations and two temporary stations run onlyduring the summer ozone season for the CCOS study. Station locationsare depicted on the map on page 2. The APCD operated stations atNipomo Regional Park, Grover Beach, Morro Bay, and Atascadero andresearch stations at Red Hills and on the summit of Black Mountain. TheAPCD also operated stations at Piedras Blancas and Camp Roberts forthe summer months only. The State Air Resources Board (ARB)operated stations at San Luis Obispo and Paso Robles. Two stations onthe Nipomo Mesa were operated by a private contractor for a petroleumrefining and production company.

Air quality monitoring is rigorously controlled by federal and state qualityassurance and control procedures to ensure data validity. Gaseouspollutant levels are measured continuously and averaged each hour, 24hours a day. Particulate pollutants are generally sampled by filtertechniques for averaging periods of three to 24 hours. PM10 (inhalableparticulate matter 10 microns or less in size) and PM2.5 (inhalableparticulate matter 2.5 microns or less in size) are sampled for 24 hoursevery sixth day on the same schedule nationwide. In addition, PM10 issampled continuously at the Atascadero monitoring station using aTEOM (tapered element oscillating microbalance) sampler.

1

Page 4: AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT€¦ · Ozone Study (CCOS). The study was guided by a policy committee comprised of staff from the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the California

Figure 1: Ambient Air Monitoring Stations in San Luis Obispo County in 2000

2

Page 5: AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT€¦ · Ozone Study (CCOS). The study was guided by a policy committee comprised of staff from the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the California

Table 1: Ambient Air Quality Parameters Monitored in San Luis Obispo County(2000)

O3 NO NO2 NOx SO2 CO PM10 PM2.5 TEOM WS WD ATMAPCD Stations

Atascadero X X X X X X X X X X

Morro Bay X X X XNipomo Regional

Park X X X X X X X X

Grover Beach X X X X X X X

*Black Mountain X X X

*Red Hills X X X X X X X

**Camp Roberts X X X X

**Piedras Blancas X X X X X X

ARB StationsSan Luis Obispo X X X X X X X X X X

Paso Robles X X X X X

Contractor Operated StationsNipomo,

Guadalupe Rd. X X X X XNipomo,

Ralcoa Way X X X X

Acronyms:O3 Ozone SO2 Sulfur Dioxide PM10 Particulates < 10 microns WS Wind SpeedNO Nitric Oxide CO Carbon Monoxide (samples every sixth day) WD Wind DirectionNO2 Nitrogen DioxideNox Oxides of Nitrogen

TEOM Particulates <10 microns (monitored continuously)

PM2.5 Particulates < 2.5 microns (samples every sixth day)

ATM Ambient Temp

* Research station** Special station for the CCOS study

3

Page 6: AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT€¦ · Ozone Study (CCOS). The study was guided by a policy committee comprised of staff from the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the California

Table 2: Ambient Air Quality Standards

Pollutant Averaging Time California Standard National Standard

1 Hour 0.09 ppm 0.12 ppm

Ozone8 Hour 0.08 ppm

(not yet implemented)

8 Hour 9.0 ppm 9 ppmCarbon

Monoxide 1 Hour 20 ppm 35 ppm

Annual Average 0.053 ppmNitrogenDioxide

1 Hour 0.25 ppm

Annual Average 80 µg/m3 (primary)

24 Hour 0.04 ppm 0.14 ppm (primary)

3 Hour 0.5 ppm (secondary)SulfurDioxide

1 Hour 0.25 ppm

Annual Geometric Mean 30 µg/m3

24 Hour 50 µg/m3 150 µg/m3PM10

Annual Arithmetic Mean

50 µg/m3

Annual Arithmetic Mean

15 µg/m3

(proposed)

Susp

ende

dPa

rtic

ulat

eM

atte

r

PM2.5

24 Hour 65 µg/m3

(proposed)

Hydrogen Sulfide 1 Hour 0.03 ppm

Visibility 1 ObservationIn sufficient amount to reduce the prevailingvisibility to less than ten miles when the relativehumidity is less than 70%.

4

Page 7: AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT€¦ · Ozone Study (CCOS). The study was guided by a policy committee comprised of staff from the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the California

In recent years wehave experiencedboth our worst andour cleanest ozoneseasons. Thefactors that lead toozone formationare very complexand include:climate,topography,emissions ofprecursorpollutants, andpollutant transport. Air qualitymonitoring hasshown that ozonelevels can be verydifferent from yearto year. Thereasons for this arenot yet fullyunderstood and arethe subject ofongoing research.

A standardexceedanceoccurs when ameasured valuemeets exceedancecriteria prescribedby state or federalagencies and doesnot necessarilyconstitute aviolation.

A standardviolation mayoccur following asingle orcumulative seriesof standardexceedances. Criteria constitutinga violation areunique for eachpollutant and mayresult in changes toan area’sattainment status.

Central California Ozone Study

During the summer of 2000 the Air Pollution Control District (APCD)participated in an air quality research effort called the Central CaliforniaOzone Study (CCOS). The study was guided by a policy committeecomprised of staff from the California Air Resources Board (ARB), theCalifornia Energy Commission (CEC), local air pollution control agencies,and industry. The study is a multi-year effort to examine ozone formationand transport in central and northern California. The field study portion,which occurred in the summer of 2000, will provide emissions, meteorologyand air quality data for use in photochemical models and other analyses tobe performed over the next several years. The study area extended fromRedding in the north to the Mojave desert in the south, and from the PacificOcean to the Sierra Nevada mountains. As a partner in the study the APCD installed and operated three newambient air monitoring stations at Piedras Blancas, Camp Roberts, andRed Hills (mostly using donated equipment). These new stationscontinuously monitored ambient ozone concentrations as well as windspeed, direction, and air temperature. They were located at the northern,western and eastern county boundaries to augment our existing network ofstations, and to shed light on the mechanisms and effects of pollutanttransport in and out of the county. In addition to surface-levelmeasurements of pollutants and meteorology, APCD staff also launchedand tracked weather balloons from the Paso Robles airport to betterunderstand air flow and other characteristics of upper level air.

Along with other important information obtained in the study, was thediscovery of a layer of very polluted air that frequently resides over theinterior northeast portion of the county during the summer ozone season. This layer is of variable thickness and seems to extend above about 2000feet in elevation. In this layer ozone concentrations can significantlyexceed those found at ground level. The polluted air is apparently normallykept from reaching the ground surface by the presence of a persistentsurface layer of relatively clean marine air from the Pacific Ocean. Theconditions under which polluted air over the interior of the county might bemixed down to ground level where it can affect people, and details aboutthe origin and transport of the pollutants are still under investigation.

Numerous cities, companies, and government institutions donated funds orother resources in support of the APCD’s involvement with the CCOSstudy. Supporters within the county included the cities of Atascadero,Morro Bay, Paso Robles, Pismo Beach, and San Luis Obispo. Countybusinesses supporting CCOS included Duke Energy, Lime MountainCompany, TOSCO Santa Maria Refinery, TOSCO Pipeline Division, andUnion Asphalt. We would like to extend our sincere thanks to all thatcontributed to this important research effort.

5

Page 8: AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT€¦ · Ozone Study (CCOS). The study was guided by a policy committee comprised of staff from the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the California

While ground levelozone is harmful toplants and animalsand is considered apollutant, upperlevel (stratospheric)ozone occursnaturally andprotects the earthfrom harmful ultra-violet energy fromthe sun.

Fine particulatematter, in additionto being a healthhazard, can greatlyreduce visibility.Recent researchsuggests that fineparticulate may bemuch moredetrimental tohuman health thanpreviously thought.

NO2 and SO2create aerosols,which may fall asacid rain causingdamage to crops,forests, and lakes.

CO is a colorless,odorless gas thatcan lower thebloods ability tocarry oxygen.

Ambient Air Quality Data Summaries

OzoneAlthough ozone occurs naturally at low concentrations near the earth'ssurface, much higher and unhealthful levels are created when airbornemixtures of hydrocarbons and oxides of nitrogen are driven by sunlight toreact, forming ozone pollution. The emissions of these ozone precursorpollutants come from many human activities, but primarily from industry andthe wide use of motor vehicles. As a pollutant, ozone is a strong oxidantgas, which attacks plant and animal tissues. It causes impaired breathingand reduced lung capacity, especially among children, athletes, andpersons with respiratory disorders. It also causes significant crop andforest damage. Ozone is a pollutant of particular concern in Californiawhere geography, climate and high population densities contribute tofrequent violations of health-based air quality standards.

Particulate MatterThe two classes of particulate matter are PM10 (coarse particulate matterless than 10 microns in aerodynamic diameter), and PM2.5 (fine particulatematter 2.5 microns or less in aerodynamic diameter). Both consist of manydifferent types of particles that vary in their chemical activity and toxicity.PM2.5 tends to be a greater health risk since it cannot be removed from thelungs once it is deeply inhaled. Sources of particulate pollution include:mineral extraction and production; combustion products from industry andmotor vehicles; demolition and construction; agricultural operations; fire;paved and unpaved roads; condensation of gaseous pollutants into liquidor solid particles; and natural sources such as wind-blown dust.

NO2, SO2, CONitrogen dioxide (NO2) is the brownish-colored component of smog. NO2irritates the eyes, nose and throat, and can damage lung tissues. Sulfurdioxide (SO2) is a colorless gas with health effects similar to NO2. SO2 andNO2 are generated by fossil fuel combustion in mobile sources (such asvehicles, ships and aircraft), and at stationary sources (such as industry,homes and businesses). SO2 may also be emitted by petroleumproduction and refining operations. The state and national standards forNO2 have never been exceeded in this county. The state standard for SO2was exceeded 34 times on the Nipomo Mesa after monitoring began therein 1984. As a result, San Luis Obispo County was formerly listed as non-attainment for the state SO2 standard by the ARB. Equipment andprocesses at the facilities responsible for the emissions have changed inrecent years, and the state SO2 standard has not been exceeded since1993. Exceedances of the federal SO2 standard have never beenmeasured here.

Carbon monoxide (CO) can cause headaches and fatigue and results fromfuel combustion of all types. Motor vehicles are by far the chief contributorof CO in outdoor air. State CO standards have not been exceeded in SanLuis Obispo since 1975. CO is measured at only one location in the countyand the measured concentrations have been low in recent years.

6

Page 9: AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT€¦ · Ozone Study (CCOS). The study was guided by a policy committee comprised of staff from the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the California

2000 OzoneThe following graphs depict 2000 monthly ozone concentrations at six locations. There are two databars presented for each month. The monthly maximum hour bar shows the highest hourly averageconcentration during the month in parts per billion (ppb). The monthly mean bar is a monthly averageconcentration and depicts an overall average ozone intensity (in ppb) for the month.

7

Morro Bay

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

ozon

e co

ncen

trat

ion

Monthly Maximum Hour Monthly Mean

State Standard

San Luis Obispo

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

ozon

e co

ncen

trat

ion

Monthly Maximum Hour Monthly Mean

State Standard

Grover Beach

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

ozon

e co

ncen

trat

ion

Monthly Maximum Hour Monthly Mean

State Standard

Nipomo Regional Park

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

ozon

e co

ncen

trat

ion

Monthly Maximum Hour Monthly Mean

State Standard

Paso Robles

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

ozon

e co

ncen

trat

ion

Monthly Maximum Hour Monthly Mean

State Standard

Atascadero

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

ozon

e co

ncen

trat

ion

Monthly Maximum Hour Monthly Mean

State Standard

Page 10: AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT€¦ · Ozone Study (CCOS). The study was guided by a policy committee comprised of staff from the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the California

2000 Ozone at CCOS Special Study Sites

Black Mountain

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

ozon

e co

ncen

trat

ion

Monthly Maximum Hour Monthly Mean

State Standard

Red Hills

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

ozon

e co

ncen

trat

ion

Monthly Maximum Hour Monthly Mean

State Standard

Camp Roberts

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

ozon

e co

ncen

trat

ion

Monthly Maximum Hour Monthly Mean

State Standard

The following graphs depict 2000 monthlyozone concentrations at three of the specialtemporary monitoring stations in place for theCCOS study (see page 5). There are twodata bars presented for each month. Themonthly maximum hour bar shows the highesthourly average concentration during themonth in parts per billion (ppb). The monthlymean bar is a monthly average concentrationand depicts an overall average ozoneintensity for the month (in ppb).

These three monitoring stations were locatedin relatively unpopulated areas onmountaintops and near the interior borders ofour county. They were sited to give us moreinformation about possible transport ofpolluted air into our county from other areas, as well as providing us with a profile of ozone concentration in the air column from groundlevel to about 4000 foot elevation. Thisinformation is invaluable to APCD staff andARB researchers in understanding pollutanttransport within California.

In general, ozone levels were higher at allthree sites than in populated areas where weregularly monitor for ozone. The wind rosefor ozone at Black Mountain shows how thehighest ozone concentrations are presentwhen the wind is out of the northeast.

8

Page 11: AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT€¦ · Ozone Study (CCOS). The study was guided by a policy committee comprised of staff from the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the California

Particulate Matter, 10 microns or less (PM10) The graphs on this and the next page present PM10 data from seven locations and a graph of PM10 trendsover the past eight years. In 2000, exceedances of the state standard of 50 micrograms per cubic meterwere recorded at four air monitoring stations in the county. No exceedance of the national standard of 150micrograms per cubic meter was measured.

9

Paso Robles 2000

0

20

40

60

80

100

WINTER SPRING SUMMER FALL

state standard: 50 micrograms/cubic t

Atascadero 2000

0

20

40

60

80

100

WINTER SPRING SUMMER FALL

state standard: 50 micrograms/cubic meter

Morro Bay 2000

0

20

40

60

80

100

WINTER SPRING SUMMER FALL

state standard: 50 micrograms/cubic meter

San Luis Obispo 2000

0

20

40

60

80

100

WINTER SPRING SUMMER FALL

state standard: 50 micrograms/cubic meter

Nipomo Regional Park 2000

0

20

40

60

80

100

WINTER SPRING SUMMER FALL

state standard: 50 micrograms/cubic meter

1300 Guadalupe Rd., Nipomo Mesa 2000

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

WINTER SPRING SUMMER FALL

state standard: 50 micrograms/cubic meter

Page 12: AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT€¦ · Ozone Study (CCOS). The study was guided by a policy committee comprised of staff from the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the California

Particulate Matter, 10 microns or less (PM10) continued.

Table 4: First, Second and Third Highest Hourly Averages for 2000sampling date and hour appears with each data value in the format of month/day : hour.

O3 (ppm) SO2 (ppm) NO2 (ppm) CO (ppm)Station 1st 2nd 3rd 1st 2nd 3rd 1st 2nd 3rd 1st 2nd 3rd

Paso Robles .0838/1:11

.0828/16:11

.0828/17:11

Atascadero .0846/14:10

.0828/1:11

.0829/13:11

.0599/12:18

.0569/12:19

.0544/1:19

Morro Bay .0634/2:15

.0614/1:16

.0603/31:16

San Luis Obispo .0758/1:17

.0695/21:17

.0644/1:16

.051n/a

.050n/a

n/a 3.912/6:17

3.411/20:08

3.312/27:08

Grover Beach .0689/13:14

.0634/1:16

.0634/12:12

.0225/28:18

.0213/21:20

.0177/31:00

.05012/18:11

.04411/03:18

.04412/05:14

Nipomo RegionalPark

.0789/13:13

.0678/1:12

.0664/01:16

.14012/28:16

.08311/20:09

.0514/02:09

.04311/19:18

.04011/3:19

.03912/26:19

Nipomo, 1300Guadalupe Road

.1505/26:17

.1243/10:13

.12112/18:13

Nipomo,Ralcoa Way

.1595/19:15

.1305/31:18

.1125/30:08

10

Ralcoa Way 2000

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

WINTER SPRING SUMMER FALL

state standard: 50 micrograms/cubic meter

Pm10 Trend

05

10152025303540

annu

al g

eom

etric

mea

n ug

/m3

93

94

95

96

97

98

99

2000

Paso Atas Moro SLO Ralcoa Guad. Rd.

Page 13: AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT€¦ · Ozone Study (CCOS). The study was guided by a policy committee comprised of staff from the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the California

COUNTYWIDE OZONE TRENDS - 1991-2000

The following graphs depict ozone trends at six locations within the county for the past ten years (nine years at PasoRobles and eight at Nipomo). Each data bar represents the total number of hours in a given year in which the ozoneconcentrations exceeded 65 parts per billion. This concentration level is a useful indicator for trend purposes eventhough there are no health standards for single-hour exposures to 65 parts per billion of ozone. The location of thePaso Robles monitoring station was changed in 1991. Consequently, data from Paso Robles is incomplete for 1991. No data was collected for Nipomo in 1997 and 1998 during which time the station was relocated. Monitoring resumedat Nipomo in November 1998.

11

Atascadero

275181 201 221

271

411

123

239 224176

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000

hour

s ab

ove

65 p

pb

Paso Robles

131 108

263355

147

1164

364

185

493

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000

hour

s ab

ove

65 p

pbMorro Bay

41 13 28 15 0 1 2 0 5 00

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000

hour

s ab

ove

65 p

pb

San Luis Obispo

17 13 24 13 21 45 6 4 12 100

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000

hour

s ab

ove

65 p

pb

Grover Beach

7 31 6 9 9 11 10 1 22 20

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000

hour

s ab

ove

65 p

pb

Nipomo

64 2945

67 42 5058 14

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000

hour

s ab

ove

65 p

pb

Page 14: AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT€¦ · Ozone Study (CCOS). The study was guided by a policy committee comprised of staff from the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the California

Errata

Subsequent to the original publication of this report, some minor errors were discovered in the

ozone and PM10 trends charts on pages 10 and 11. Corrected charts appear below; see the

2008-2009 Annual Air Quality Report for detailed discussion of the errors in the original figures.

Page 15: AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT€¦ · Ozone Study (CCOS). The study was guided by a policy committee comprised of staff from the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the California

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

an

nu

al ari

thm

eti

c m

ean

ug

/m3

PM10 Trends

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

Paso Atas Morro SLO NRP Mesa 2

state annual standard 20 ug/m3

Ralcoa