Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Aleksandar DurkovicAleksandar DurkovicProject DirectorProject Director
SERBIA ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROJECT
SEEP
EXPERIENCES OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY EXPERIENCES OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROJECT IN SERBIAPROJECT IN SERBIA
November, 2011
Sch
ools
, H
ospi
tals
& S
ocia
l Car
e In
stitu
tions
Sch
ools
, H
ospi
tals
& S
ocia
l Car
e In
stitu
tions
Spread Across Serbia Spread Across Serbia
1st Phase – Original Financing• IDA Credit 3870 YF – 21 mil. USD
• Contributions of Serbia – 4 mil. USD
• Total facility: 25 mil. USD
• In total 28 buildings for 10 mil. USD +
CC Belgrade energy system rehabilitation for 15 mil. USD
2nd Phase - Additional Financing• IDA Credit 3870-1 YF – 10 mil. USD
• IBRD Loan 7466 YF – 18 mil. USD
• Contribution of Serbia – 2 mil. USD
• Total facility: 30 mil. USD
• In total 86 buildings for 23 mil. USD+
CC Nis new energy system erection for 7 mil. USD
Implementation Body:
Serbian Energy Efficiency Agency
Stakeholders’ StructureStakeholders’ Structure
Funding: WORLD BANK
Beneficiary: Government of
SerbiaCredits &
Loans
Coordination:Ministry for Infrastructure and Energy
Investors and Nominees:
Ministry of Health
Ministry of Education and
Science
Ministry of Labor and Social Policy
SavingsObjectives
Audits
Inpu
ts - F
inan
cingImplementation
Nominations
Defining the Project Objectives and Defining the Project Objectives and
ImplementationImplementation
SEEP Outputs &Outcomes
Objectives:• Making heating more
affordable by energy savings = cost reduction
• Improvement of the functional health
environment for the users• Reduce the local and
global environmental impact of the use of dirty fuels for heating buildings
in Serbia
2nd Phase Implementation
Component A:Clinical Center of Nis in Nis – 7
mil. USD Energy supply (30 MW) and
distribution (2 km + 20 substations) system erection 19 Buildings inside CCN complex - Energy Efficiency
rehabilitationComponent B:
17 hospitals+40 schools+10 social care institutions
throughout Serbia – 23 mil. USD Energy Efficiency retrofit
1st Phase Implementation
Component A:Clinical Center of Serbia in
Belgrade – 15 mil. USD Gas fired boiler house – 50 MW
New heat substations – 55 units
New distribution network – 3.5 km
CHP plant construction – 4 MW
Component B:12 Hospitals + 16 Schools
throughout Serbia – 10 mil. USD•Energy Efficiency retrofit
Objectives AchievedObjectives Achieved
Technical EnvironmentSocial Impact
Energy savings inaverage of 40%
Indoor comfort improved 35 - 50%Satisfaction raised significantly
Awareness raised
CO2 reduction in average of 42%Elimination of ash, soot and SO2
Nitrogen oxides reduced
Benefits Benefits
Line Ministries proved as reliable decision maker
Department focused and touch points to other immediate impact areas
Technical & Financial
Healthcare, learning and working conditions improved
Environmental concern
Corporate and Institutional Responsibility
Technical & Financial
Healthcare, learning and working conditions improved
Process of ImplementationProcess of Implementation
Structure of EE measuresStructure of EE measures
Simple Payback Period - SPPSimple Payback Period - SPP
SPP - Whole ProjectSPP - Whole Project
Towards Serbian National Energy BenchmarksTowards Serbian National Energy Benchmarks
Hospital in the Town of Knjazevac
Hospital in Knjazevac – Overview Hospital in Knjazevac – Overview
Benefit Sharing Scheme Benefit Sharing Scheme
The Role of Benefit Sharing Scheme The Role of Benefit Sharing Scheme
• Stimulates the rational behavior• Grants the retain of portion of savings by end users• Incentive for even more savings• Show Case – Best practice Example• Impact to other stakeholders within local self
government
ROLL FORWARD MODEL ROLL FORWARD MODEL (RE-INVESTMENT)(RE-INVESTMENT)
Outcome: • The SAVING in energy costs (OPEX – savings in
operational expenditures) is used to • PAY BACK
• the CAPITAL INVESTMENT EXPENDITURES (Input = C – capex) of the PROJECT
• over a five to ten year period, or • Reinvested into the new building to allow for further
energy SAVINGS
Good Practice ExampleGood Practice ExampleLocal Self Government of Town of VrsacLocal Self Government of Town of Vrsac
1.E
lem
enta
ry S
cho
ol
“Bra
nko
Rad
icev
ic”
– vi
llag
e U
ljm
a
2.S
eco
nd
ary
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral
and
Tec
hn
olo
gy
Sch
oo
l in
Vrs
ac
Re - InvestmentRe - InvestmentLSG VRSAC, Serbia Savings p/a Financial Savings ≈ €
p/a ES ULJMA 30% 10,000
SS AGRICULTURAL SCHOOL VRSAC 30% 10,000 2-5 SCHOOLS WITH PARTIAL RETROFIT 40% 30.000
TOTAL 100% 50.000
The portion of savings, acquired by LSG is used in two possible ways:
1. Implementing, i.e. financing own EE projects, or
2.Contracting the EE Services.
Influence on other Investors and InstitutionsInfluence on other Investors and Institutions
• Acceptation of standards re thermal properties of windows from 2.3 to 1.7 and now to 1.3 W/m²K
• Acceptation of standards re thickness of wall thermal insulation from 5 to 10 cm, and for roofs from 10 to 20cm
• Inclusion of the most of the EE measures in the green field building practice as well as renovations in Serbia
• Measurement of energy consumption and monitoring of savings in time re benchmarks
• Methodology for defining the most effective EE packages• Simple software for assessment of the measures and monitoring of
results re benchmarks• Driving other Bank’s EE investment in existing building stock
renovation (KfW loan for about EUR 10 million for schools energy retrofit and JICA for about EUR 8 million for schools and hospitals)
• Awaiting for P4R: new WB’s lending instrument – disbursement against results (possible help to establish revolving EE fund)
• Driving PPP and ESCO schemes in EE services in Serbia
Republic of Serbia
Ministry of Infrastructure and Energy
&
Energy Efficiency Agency
Aleksandar Durkovic
Project Director & Building Expert
