1
PP-388 Angiographic Characteristics of Coronary Artery Fistulas: A Retrospective Database Study Cemal Tuncer 1 , Beyhan Eryonucu 2 , Talantbek Batyraliev 3 , Mustafa Gokce 4 , Remzi Yilmaz 5 , Murat Akkoyun 1 , Gurkan Acar 1 1 Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, Kahramanmaras, 2 Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Turgut Ozal University, Ankara, 3 Department of Cardiology, Sani Konukoglu Hospital, Gaziantep, 4 Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Karadeniz Teknik University, Trabzon, 5 Department of Cardiology, OSM Hospital, Sanliurfa Objectıves: Coronary artery stula (CAF) in adults is a rare form of coronary artery anomalies. It is often diagnosed incidentally during coronary angiograms. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical and angiographic characteristics of adult patients with CAF. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the database of 70850 patients who had undergone coronary angiography at 5 different invasive cardiology centers in the southeastern region of Turkey. Among them there were 56 patients with CAF (39 males and 17 females, mean age: 63.710.4 years). Demographic data and clinical evaluation, and cardiac catheterization reports were reviewed from medical records. Results: A total of 58 stulas were detected in 56 patients; two patients (4%) had bilateral stulas originating from both left coronary artery and right coronary artery. In our angiographic series, CAF prevalence was 0.079%. Dyspnea on exertion and / or angina pectoris was the most common symptoms (69%). There were 15 (29%) patients with concomitant obstructive coronary artery disease. Coronary artery stulas were originated mainly from left anterior descending artery (n¼30, 58%). Others were originating from right coronary artery (n¼15, %29), circumex artery (n¼6, 11%), and right sinus of Valsalva (n¼3, 6%). In four patients (n¼4, 8%), there were multiple micro stula drop into the left ventricle. Conclusıons: In our angiographic series, the prevalence of CAF was 0.079%. The most common site of origin was left anterior descending artery. PP-389 Comparison of Carotid Artery Stenting and Carotid Endarterectomy in Patients with Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis Hakan Muhammed Tas ¸ 1 , Ziya Simsek 1 , Abdurrahim Colak 2 ,Pınar Demir 1 , Recep Demir 3 , Yavuzer Koza 1 , Ibrahim Halil Tanboga 1 , Fuat Gundogdu 1 , Serdar Sevimli 1 1 Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ataturk University, Erzurum, 2 Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ataturk University, Erzurum, 3 Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Ataturk University, Erzurum Background and Aım: Large randomised trials have established carotid endarter- ectomy (CEA) as the standard treatment for symptomatic severe carotid artery stenosis. Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has been increasingly used for possible alternative treatment to CEA. In this study we aimed to compare the periprocedural and one year fallow-up outcomes of CAS with those of CEA among patients with symptomatic extracranial carotid stenosis in patients from eastern Turkey. Methods: The hospital records of all patients who underwent carotid artery revas- cularization between May 2011 and May 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the type of carotid revascularization performed, namely CEA or CAS. Comparisons between the 2 groups were made with respect to pre-procedural risk factors, periprocedural and post-procedural transient ischemic attack (TIA), myocardial infarction (MI), stroke and death rates. Cumulative survival for both groups was also analysed. Results: Thirty-two CEA procedures were performed by vascular surgeons and 33 CAS procedures were performed by cardiologists during the time period being evaluated. All of the operations and CAS were performed for symptomatic carotid occlusive disease. Baseline characteristics were similar between both treatment groups except for antihypertensive usage, the incidence of Diabetes Mellitus, and Atrial Fibrillation. The total 30-day perioperative TIA and death rates for CEA were similar. Stroke and periprocedural MI was not observed. No signicant differences were found with respect to 30-day mortality and neurologic morbidity endpoints. In the post- procedure 1 year fallow-up when both groups were analysed, only TIA was observed signicantly higher in CAS group, the other endpoints did not differ signicantly. One year cumulative survival did not differ in the CEA or CAS groups according to calendar period of admission (Log Rank p¼0.300). Conclusıon: In our trial of patients with severe symptomatic carotid artery stenosis no signicant difference could be shown in periprocedural outcomes, post-procedural outcomes except TIA, and in cumulative survival with one year fallow-up between patients who underwent carotid artery stenting and those who underwent endarter- ectomy. CAS is a safe and efcacious alternative for the treatment of symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Table 1 Variable Carotid Artery Stenting (n¼33) Carotid Endarterectomy (n¼32) p Value Age 71.5110.31 69.8111.07 0.421 Male gender 25 (75%) 31 (96%) 0.064 Symptomatic Amaurosis Fugax 5 (15%) 6 (19%) 0.699 TIA 25 (76%) 26 (82%) 0.590 Stroke 3 (9%) 0 0.081 Diabetes Mellitus 11 (33%) 20 (62%) <0.05 Hypertension 25 (76%) 21 (66%) 0.369 Smoker 20 (61%) 25 (78%) 0.126 CAD 23 (70%) 16 (50%) 0.105 Previous Myocardial _ Infarction 13 (39%) 9 (28%) 0.337 Previous CABG 5 (15%) 5 (16%) 0.958 Previous PTCA 15 (45%) 14 (43%) 0.890 Atrial Fibrillation 5 (15%) 1 (3%) <0.05 Preprocedural Medication ASA 25 (76%) 32(100%) 0.157 Clopidogrel 23 (70%) 19 (59%) 0.389 Antihypertensive 30 (91%) 21(65%) <0.05 Statin 33 (100%) 32(100%) 1 CAD: Coronary artery disease, CABG: Coronary artery by-pass graft surgery, PTCA: Percuta- neous transluminal coronary angioplasty, ASA: Acetyl salicylic acid Table 2 Variable CAS CEA p Value Periprocedural Transient Ischemic Attack 3 (9.1%) 2 (6.2%) 0.721 Myocardial Infarction 0 0 - Stroke 2(6.0%) 0 0.081 Death 0 2 (6.2%) 0.072 Postprocedural Transient Ischemic Attack 3 (9.0%) 0 <0.05 Myocardial Infarction 2 (6.0%) 2(6.2%) 0.963 Stroke 2 (6.0%) 3 (9.3%) 0.357 Death 1 (3,0%) 3 (9.3%) 0.137 C236 JACC Vol 62/18/Suppl C j October 2629, 2013 j TSC Abstracts/POSTERS POSTERS

Angiographic Characteristics of Coronary Artery Fistulas: A Retrospective Database Study

  • Upload
    gurkan

  • View
    214

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Angiographic Characteristics of Coronary Artery Fistulas: A Retrospective Database Study

Table 1

Variable

Carotid Artery

Stenting (n¼33)

Carotid

Endarterectomy

(n¼32) p Value

Age 71.51�10.31 69.81�11.07 0.421

Male gender 25 (75%) 31 (96%) 0.064

Symptomatic

Amaurosis Fugax 5 (15%) 6 (19%) 0.699

TIA 25 (76%) 26 (82%) 0.590

Stroke 3 (9%) 0 0.081

Diabetes Mellitus 11 (33%) 20 (62%) <0.05

Hypertension 25 (76%) 21 (66%) 0.369

Smoker 20 (61%) 25 (78%) 0.126

CAD 23 (70%) 16 (50%) 0.105

Previous Myocardial_Infarction

13 (39%) 9 (28%) 0.337

Previous CABG 5 (15%) 5 (16%) 0.958

Previous PTCA 15 (45%) 14 (43%) 0.890

Atrial Fibrillation 5 (15%) 1 (3%) <0.05

PreproceduralMedication

ASA 25 (76%) 32(100%) 0.157

Clopidogrel 23 (70%) 19 (59%) 0.389

Antihypertensive 30 (91%) 21(65%) <0.05

Statin 33 (100%) 32(100%) 1

CAD: Coronary artery disease, CABG: Coronary artery by-pass graft surgery, PTCA: Percuta-neous transluminal coronary angioplasty, ASA: Acetyl salicylic acid

Table 2

Variable CAS CEA p Value

Periprocedural

Transient IschemicAttack

3 (9.1%) 2 (6.2%) 0.721

MyocardialInfarction

0 0 -

Stroke 2(6.0%) 0 0.081

Death 0 2 (6.2%) 0.072

Postprocedural

Transient Ischemic 3 (9.0%) 0 <0.05

POSTERS

PP-388

Angiographic Characteristics of Coronary Artery Fistulas: A RetrospectiveDatabase Study

Cemal Tuncer1, Beyhan Eryonucu2, Talantbek Batyraliev3, Mustafa Gokce4,Remzi Yilmaz5, Murat Akkoyun1, Gurkan Acar11Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kahramanmaras Sutcu ImamUniversity, Kahramanmaras, 2Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine,Turgut Ozal University, Ankara, 3Department of Cardiology, Sani KonukogluHospital, Gaziantep, 4Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, KaradenizTeknik University, Trabzon, 5Department of Cardiology, OSM Hospital, Sanliurfa

Objectıves: Coronary artery fistula (CAF) in adults is a rare form of coronary arteryanomalies. It is often diagnosed incidentally during coronary angiograms. The aim ofthis study was to evaluate clinical and angiographic characteristics of adult patientswith CAF.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the database of 70850 patients who hadundergone coronary angiography at 5 different invasive cardiology centers in thesoutheastern region of Turkey. Among them there were 56 patients with CAF (39males and 17 females, mean age: 63.7�10.4 years). Demographic data and clinicalevaluation, and cardiac catheterization reports were reviewed from medical records.Results: A total of 58 fistulas were detected in 56 patients; two patients (4%) hadbilateral fistulas originating from both left coronary artery and right coronary artery. Inour angiographic series, CAF prevalence was 0.079%. Dyspnea on exertion and / orangina pectoris was the most common symptoms (69%). There were 15 (29%)patients with concomitant obstructive coronary artery disease. Coronary artery fistulaswere originated mainly from left anterior descending artery (n¼30, 58%). Others wereoriginating from right coronary artery (n¼15, %29), circumflex artery (n¼6, 11%),and right sinus of Valsalva (n¼3, 6%). In four patients (n¼4, 8%), there were multiplemicro fistula drop into the left ventricle.Conclusıons: In our angiographic series, the prevalence of CAF was 0.079%. Themost common site of origin was left anterior descending artery.

PP-389

Comparison of Carotid Artery Stenting and Carotid Endarterectomy in Patientswith Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis

Hakan Muhammed Tas1, Ziya Simsek1, Abdurrahim Colak2, Pınar Demir1,Recep Demir3, Yavuzer Koza1, Ibrahim Halil Tanboga1, Fuat Gundogdu1,Serdar Sevimli11Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ataturk University, Erzurum,2Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ataturk University,Erzurum, 3Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Ataturk University,Erzurum

Background and Aım: Large randomised trials have established carotid endarter-ectomy (CEA) as the standard treatment for symptomatic severe carotid arterystenosis. Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has been increasingly used for possiblealternative treatment to CEA. In this study we aimed to compare the periproceduraland one year fallow-up outcomes of CAS with those of CEA among patients withsymptomatic extracranial carotid stenosis in patients from eastern Turkey.Methods: The hospital records of all patients who underwent carotid artery revas-cularization between May 2011 and May 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Patientswere divided into 2 groups based on the type of carotid revascularization performed,namely CEA or CAS. Comparisons between the 2 groups were made with respect topre-procedural risk factors, periprocedural and post-procedural transient ischemicattack (TIA), myocardial infarction (MI), stroke and death rates. Cumulative survivalfor both groups was also analysed.Results: Thirty-two CEA procedures were performed by vascular surgeons and 33CAS procedures were performed by cardiologists during the time period beingevaluated. All of the operations and CAS were performed for symptomatic carotidocclusive disease. Baseline characteristics were similar between both treatment groupsexcept for antihypertensive usage, the incidence of Diabetes Mellitus, and AtrialFibrillation. The total 30-day perioperative TIA and death rates for CEA were similar.Stroke and periprocedural MI was not observed. No significant differences were foundwith respect to 30-day mortality and neurologic morbidity endpoints. In the post-procedure 1 year fallow-up when both groups were analysed, only TIA was observedsignificantly higher in CAS group, the other endpoints did not differ significantly. Oneyear cumulative survival did not differ in the CEA or CAS groups according tocalendar period of admission (Log Rank p¼0.300).Conclusıon: In our trial of patients with severe symptomatic carotid artery stenosis nosignificant difference could be shown in periprocedural outcomes, post-proceduraloutcomes except TIA, and in cumulative survival with one year fallow-up betweenpatients who underwent carotid artery stenting and those who underwent endarter-ectomy. CAS is a safe and efficacious alternative for the treatment of symptomaticcarotid artery stenosis.

Attack

MyocardialInfarction

2 (6.0%) 2(6.2%) 0.963

Stroke 2 (6.0%) 3 (9.3%) 0.357

Death 1 (3,0%) 3 (9.3%) 0.137

C236 JACC Vol 62/18/Suppl C j October 26–29, 2013 j TSC Abstracts/POSTERS