Antonioni Red Desert

8/13/2019 Antonioni Red Desert

1/21

Landscapes of Deliquescence in Michelangelo Antonioni's "Red Desert"Author(s): Matthew GandySource: Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series, Vol. 28, No. 2 (Jun.,2003), pp. 218-237Published by: Blackwell Publishing on behalf of The Royal Geographical Society (with the

Institute of British Geographers)Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3804446Accessed: 18/03/2010 23:02

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at

http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless

you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you

may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.

Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at

http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=black.

Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed

page of such transmission.

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of

content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms

of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].

Blackwell Publishingand The Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers)are

collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Transactions of the Institute of BritishGeographers.

http://www.jstor.org
http://www.jstor.org/stable/3804446?origin=JSTOR-pdfhttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=blackhttp://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=blackhttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/stable/3804446?origin=JSTOR-pdf


2/21

Landscapes o deliquescencenMichelangelontonioni s e d e s e r t

Matthew GandyThe cinematic landscape provides a rich opportunity to explore culturalrepresentations of place, space and nature. This essay focuses on the depiction oflandscape in Michelangelo Antonioni's Red Desert(1964).Previous approaches to thecriticalinterpretationof landscape in the cinema of Antonioni have been characterizedby three principal weaknesses: a narrow emphasis on formalist and auterist lines ofinfluence between different branches of the visual arts;an attachment to exceptionalistcharacterizationsof the Italian cinematic landscape;and a transhistoricalinterpretationof existential themes such as alienation. In this essay we shall consider two neglectedthemes: the significance of the technological sublime for the aesthetic experience ofindustrial landscapes; and the impact of abstractexpressionism on Antonioni'scinematic vision. We will counter simplistic categorizations of Antonioni's work byconsidering the complexity of the relationship between the cinematic landscape andwider developments in twentieth-century modernism. The essay concludes by locatingRed Desertat a unique juncture in the development of modernist conceptions of natureand landscape.key words landscape cinema modernity Italy Michelangelo AntonioniDepartmentof Geography, UniversityCollegeLondon,LondonWC1HOAPemail:[email protected] manuscript received 31 January 2003

IntroductionModernism was modernity's official opposition. It wasthe pessimist to modernity's eternal optimism. (Clark2002, 173)1Antonioni's films question the visible until there's notenough light to see any more. (Berger1995, 10)2

The German emigr6 and cultural critic SiegfriedKracaueronce remarked how 'the design of natureis the fountainhead of all visions' (1960, 204), yetwe know comparatively little of the engagementbetween filmmaking and cultural responses tolandscape.3 More specifically, the relationshipbetween the cinematic landscape and twentieth-century modernism remains only partially explored.This essay contends that a more nuanced readingof the cinematic landscape avoids the flatteningeffects of theoretical or metaphysical reductionismand has the potential to move beyond trans-historical phenomenologies of human perception.Before proceeding further, we should pause a

moment over the word 'landscape', which hasbecome so critical to recent discussions concern-ing place, space and cultural representations ofnature. A range of scholarship has highlighted howthe very idea of landscape implies a process ofalienation from nature and is an integral elementin the development of modern aesthetics.4 Thedepiction of landscape in film takes this process ofalienation a stage further by immersing us in apanoramic representation of space that radicallyextends the possibilities of aesthetic experience. Atthe outset, therefore,we can argue that the cinematiclandscape is a natural focus for any systematicexploration of the depiction of space in modernculture. Yet the core concept of landscape, in all itsetymological and historical complexity, is onlyrarely placed at the forefront of critical writing oncinema.The cinematic landscape presents a profoundchallenge to established modes of critical inquirywithin architectural theory, geography, sociology

TransInst BrGeogrNS 28 218-237 2003ISSN 0020-2754 ? Royal Geographical Society (with The Institute of British Geographers) 2003


3/21

Landscapesfdeliquescencen Michelangelontonioni'sRed Desertand other disciplines. The classic idea of landscaperests on a cultural mediation between space andthe human subject that is facilitated through art ordesign. In the modern era, however, this emphasishas shifted to encompass new kinds of landscapeexperience engendered by technologicaltransforma-tions in the use and representation of space. Withthe development of modern cinema, this techno-logical relation to landscape becomes double-codedso that we experience the movement of the imageitself at one further remove from the embodiedencounters with space which underpinned tradi-tional conceptions of landscape design. Yet thecinematic frame is also enclosed within its owngeometry of perception through the architecturalaspects to cinema houses and varying contextswithin which film itself is consumed as a culturalproduct. Though our focus is on the representationof space in film, it is important to recognize thatfilm encodes its own spatialities of production andconsumption, which are themselves undergoing aprocess of displacement through the shift towardsdigital media and other transformations in con-temporary visual culture. Cinema presents uswith a matrix of visual codes and symbols thatcan provide insights into broader historical andpolitical themes within the development of modernculture. Our intellectual task can be likened to the'appropriationof geography in history' through aninterdisciplinary and intertextual exploration of therelationship between cinematic topographies andthe evolution of visual cultures.6Such a strategy ofinterpretation is naturally opposed to any normat-ive or narrowly idealist conception of aestheticsand finds a rich intellectual lineage through, forexample, the early film theory of Bela Balazs,the 'visual unconscious' of Walter Benjamin, the'visible hieroglyphs' of Siegfried Kracauer and theexploration of 'iconology' in the writings of ErwinPanofsky.7In this essay we shall examine the significance oflandscape in Italian cinema through the work ofMichelangelo Antonioni. Antonioni was born in1912 in Ferrara,northern Italy, and began his earlycareer with a mix of film criticism and document-ary production. In the 1950s, Antonioni becameclosely associated with the development of neo-realist Italian cinema and established his reputa-tion through features such as I vinti (1953) and Ilgrido (1957).8 With the release of his criticallyacclaimed trilogy - L'avventura(1960), La notte(1961) and L'eclisse 1962) - Antonioni established a

distinctive cinematic vision with its character-istic emphasis on themes of alienation and spatialdisorientation. In this essay we shall focus onAntonioni's first colour feature film - Red Desert[Ildesertorosso](1964)- which proved both a commer-cial and critical success on its release and remainsan important point of departure for critical debatesabout his work. Red Desert was one of a number offilms that marked a transition from the predomin-ance of neo-realist approaches in Italian cinema toan emerging engagement with a wider variety ofaesthetic and intellectual themes. The period fromthe late 1950s to the early 1960s was marked by aresurgence of public interest and internationalacclaimfor Italiancinema,which gave Antonioni andhis contemporaries a new degree of self-confidencein the cultural status of film and deepened the exist-ing dialogue between cinema and wider develop-ments in art and literature.9The combination ofenhanced artistic freedom and commercial successfacilitated a shift towards more ambitious projectsthat sought to transcend the more technicallyrudimentary and small-scale dimensions of earlierproductions. The contemporarycritic and filmmakerPier Paolo Pasolini, for example, claimed that RedDesert marked a new level of sophistication inItalian cinema: the film came close to his ideal of'free indirect subjectivity'through the developmentof a distinctive poetic or oneiric form of cinematiclanguage (see Pasolini 1965). Although these earlyattempts to emphasize the semiotic basis for aputative 'cinematic exceptionalism' now appeartheoretically anachronistic, there is little doubt thatthe work of Antonioni helped to raise the status ofcinema within the visual arts.

Landscape features prominently in many of themost criticallyacclaimedexamples of Italiancinema.Consider, for example, the Mediterranean gariguein Pier Paolo Pasolini's The gospel accordingto StMatthew [II Vangelo SecondoMatteo] (1964) or theurban vistas in Roberto Rossellini's Rome, OpenCity [Roma,Citta Aperta] (1945). The centrality oflandscape to what Noa Steimatsky (1995, 39-40)terms the 'Italian cinematic imagination' hasemerged within the context of relatively late pro-cesses of industrialization and state formationin modern Italy. 'The primacy of landscape in theItalian cinematic imagination,' argues Steimatsky,'is grounded in the specific geographical condi-tions of Italy, its varied and rich conglomeratesof landscapes, and the cultural traditions, mythsand connotations that invest specific locales with

219


4/21

220meaning and value.'? The 'authentic' Italian land-scape became a powerful cinematic motif duringthe early decades of the twentieth century anddrew support from across the political spectrum. Ifwe survey the history of Italian cinema, we find adegree of aesthetic continuity running through thepre-fascist, fascist and post-fascist phases of Italianfilmmaking. The development of neo-realism in the1940s thus marked a political reappropriation ofthe cultural depiction of landscape that displacedthe nationalist sentiments of the fascist era with aneo-Marxian emphasis on landscape as a focus ofsocial and political struggle (see Steimatsky 1995,46-8). Yet, in the cinema of Antonioni, the depic-tion of landscape moves beyond the physicality ofspace as a locus for action towards an engagementwith the aesthetic effects of landscape on the psy-chological state of his protagonists. The cinematiclandscape becomes the dramatic setting for anexploration of the experience of modernity.Attempts to locate Red Desert within a broaderterrain of cultural theory have proved elusive. Inthe 1960s, anti-modern critics were hostile towardsthe film, which they saw as antithetical to tradi-tional cinema, whilst modernist critics placed thefilm at the cutting edge of European cinema. Tradi-tionalists such as HenryHart(1965,181),forexample,dismissed Red Desert as 'intellectually bankrupt'and 'culturally reprehensible', whereas more sym-pathetic voices such as Jean-Andre Fieschi (1965,84) were delighted by the panoply of modernistcultural references. More recently, there have beenattempts to subsume Antonioni's work within apost-modern cinematic canon simply on the basisof its complexity and concern with questions ofidentity (see Brunette 1998;Rohdie 1990).Yet noneof these simplistic categorizations are satisfactory.In interpreting Red Desertit is useful to grasp twoshifting dynamics: first, the changing nature ofAntonioni's cinematic vision and its articulationwith a wider cultural and political field; and sec-ond, the radically altered context for film criticismas it has passed through successive waves of the-oreticaland conceptual transformation.If we surveythe existing literature on Antonioni, we find thatthere are three prominent weaknesses. First, therehas been a focus on the influence of twentieth-century art without any consideration of the politi-cal and intellectual tensions running throughmodernist aesthetics. Much of the critical writingthat exists on the relationship between film andart appears trapped within a formalist frame of

MatthewGandyreference that is preoccupied with auterist linesof influence rather than any wider consideration ofhow different fields of cultural production interact.Angela Dalle Vache (1996), for example, takes atface value Antonioni's attempt to emulate abstractexpressionism and never explores the limitations tohis neo-romantic conception of creative autonomyin the visual arts. Second, there has been a recur-ring emphasis on the 'essential' characteristics ofthe Italian cinematic landscape rooted in a weaklydeveloped contextualization of the history oflandscape change. These static perspectives arefounded on determinist conceptions of the relation-ship between landscape and culture which areclearly at odds with the increasingly international-ist scope of Antonioni's cinema. And third, we findthat Antonioni's cinema has been read as emblem-atic of the 'human condition' or some other trans-historical category derived from the legacy ofWestern humanism. Red Desert has, for example,been characterized as a film which is 'almostbeyond verbal description or analysis' and whichtranscends social critique in order to focus on'more fundamental and permanent metaphysicalissues' (Cameron and Wood 1971, 112).In this essay two themes will be developed.First, we explore the significance of the technolo-gical sublime for the cinematic depiction of indus-trial landscapes. We find that Antonioni combineselements of the Kantian and Burkean sublime intoa distinctive synthesis as part of his aestheticambivalence towards the technological trans-formation of modern Italy. Second, we consider therelationship between Antonioni's cinematic icono-graphy and the development of abstract expres-sionism in the visual arts. We encounter thelimitations of a Greenbergian emphasis on the cul-tural autonomy and teleological progression oftwentieth-centurymodernism.Takentogether, thesetwo themes help to illuminate the relationshipbetween Antonioni's cinematic oeuvre and thecomplexities of modernist aesthetics in relation tocultural depictions of landscape.

The technological sublimeIn the countrysidearoundRavenna,the horizon isdominated y factories,mokestacksndrefineries.Thebeauty of that view is much more striking than theanonymous mass of pine trees which you see from afar,all lined up in a row, the same colour. (Antonioni1964b,253)


5/21

Landscapesfdeliquescencen Michelangelontonioni'sRed DesertFilmed on location over a period of two months inthe autumn of 1963, Red Desert is set in and aroundthe city of Ravenna in north-east Italy. Antonioni'svivid depiction of Italy's second largest portpresents us with a detailed insight into thechanging lives and landscapes of modern Italy. Insome ways the film marks a return to the place-based focus of Antonioni's earlier documentaryfilms: the misty landscapes of Red Desertrecall, forexample, his very first film, Gente del Po (1943-7),which depicts the people and landscapes of thePo Valley. In Red Desert Antonioni ignores thebeautiful architecture of mediaeval Ravenna,beloved of Baedeker and countless other touristguides. Instead, he presents us with what theFrench critic Michele Manceaux describes as a'short course in economic geography':

If the alabasterwindows of Galla Placidadiffuse thesoftestlight in the world,and if the blue mosaicsarelike a plungeinto the depthsof the sea,all this meanslittle to him, all this belongs to the past. He choseRavenna orits smokyfactories,ts oil derricks,ts steelpylons.Afterthe war, the pinewoodsstretcheddownto the sea and the town had thirtythousand nhabit-ants.Todaythe silos and oil refinerieshave killedoffthe trees. Oil has been found here, artificial slandshave been built;and there are a hundred and fortythousandnhabitants.Manceaux964,119)In the opening sequence of RedDesert,we observethe main protagonist Giuliana (played by MonicaVitti) walking with her young son across a muddyand desolate landscape. The only bright coloursare her full-length green coat, her child's lightbrown duffel coat and the orange petroleum flaresin the background. Lines of workers shuffle past,some of whom are wearing transparent raincoatswhich resemble space suits or perhaps even specialclothing to provide protection from radiation andhazardous chemicals. She looks out across theundulating expanse of oily puddles and refuse.Small swirls of steam emanate from the ground asif she were walking near the crater of a volcano.Beyond the blackened remnants of trees, and half-shrouded in mist, we can discern an array of com-plex industrial structures ranging from immensegas purification plants to elaborate water towers.Moments later she enters a factory to meet herhusband Ugo (played by Carlo Chionetti) and anew factory manager Corrado (played by RichardHarris). The camera tracks between an austeremodern control room and a vast hanger filled withpipes and turbines where we can scarcely hear the

human voices above the din of machinery.The sleekmodernist decor of the factory offices and controlrooms contrasts with the brutal and anarchiccharacteristicsof the surrounding landscape.At one level Red Desert is a lament for whatAntonioni describes as the 'violent transformationof the countryside around the city' (1964b, 253), butit is at the same time a multi-faceted immersionin the experience of modernity. The ambivalenceof technology is explored in Red Desert throughthemes such as alienation, spatial disorientationand the chromatic dissonance of modern land-scapes. A sense of aesthetic estrangement is sig-nalled from the title sequence of the film, wherecaptions are superimposed on a series of deliber-ately blurred images accompanied by avant-gardeelectronic music (composed by Vittorio Gelmetti).The environs of modern Ravenna provide a vividportrayal of a new and unfamiliar landscapeemerging under the post-war miracoloof Italianeconomic prosperity. The political salience of thefilm is signalled from the outset by a man standingon top of a car outside the perimeter fence of afactory shouting through a megaphone. We learnthat the pretext for this industrial dispute is asomewhat incongruous plan to relocate workers toPatagonia, yet class antagonisms play only a minorrole in the film. Maps of Patagonia appear inseveral scenes in order to allude to the emerginginternationaldivision of labour.The abstractdynamicsof industrial change are emphasized by thedetached and technical terms used to explain thefuture of the factory. We observe the pensive facesof workers gathered to hear details of their reloca-tion, but their experience does not become the focalpoint for the film. Antonioni's exploration of socialchange develops not from the vantage point of theindustrial workers, but through an intense explora-tion of the alienation felt by the upwardly mobileworkers of the new Italy. This emerging 'techno-cracy' of middle-ranking managers and skilledworkers is represented in Red Desertas a distinctivesocial class who enjoy the material prosperity ofmodern Ravenna,but who are nonetheless ambival-ent about the consequences of this economic trans-formation. 'A new class is coming into existence inthis extraordinary landscape', suggests Antonioni,'and my characters belong to this working-classbourgeoisie' (cited in Manceaux 1964, 119).Much of the film is focused on the growing senseof anxiety experienced by Giuliana as she wandersbetween different locations in the city. For Marxist

221


6/21

222critics such as Armando Borrelli, this fatalistic dis-avowal of class conflict marks an abandonment ofpolitical commitment, whereas Lino Micciche sug-gests that the film presents a radical critique ofbourgeois society (Borrelli 1966; Micciche 1975).11Thecinema of Antonioni is largely devoid of the tenseconfrontation between Catholicism and Marxismthat marks some of the most self-consciously pol-itical films associated with the development ofneo-realism such as Roberto Rossellini's Rome,Open City (1945) or Vittorio De Sica's The BicycleThief (1948). The critical distinction between RedDesert and most examples of Italian neo-realismlies in Antonioni's emphasis on the effects ratherthan the causes of social and political change:

I think filmmakers hould always try to reflect thetimes in whichtheylive - not so much to expressandinterpretevents in their most direct and tragicform,but ratherto capturetheir effect upon us. (CitedinStrick1963,8)

By focusing on the 'effects' of modernity,Antonioni develops a cinematic engagement withwider developments in cultural modernism. RedDesert does not present an outright rejection ofmodernity, but rests on a profound ambivalencetowards the post-war transformation of modernItaly. On the one hand, Antonioni echoes thetechnological critique of the FrankfurtSchool in hisconcern with 'the gap between moral man andscientific man':12

The myth of the factoryconditions he life of every-body here,denudes it of surpriseand disembodiest.Thesyntheticproductdominates, ndsooneror later twill end up by making reesinto obsoleteobjects, ikethehorses. Antonioni 964c, 3)13On the other hand, however, Antonioni marvelsat the scale and dynamism of modern landscapes,noting that 'even factories can be beautiful':

I don'tsay that thereought to be a return o nature,that industrializations wrong.I even find somethingvery beautiful n this masteryof man over matter.Tome, thesepipesandgirders eemjustas movingas thetrees.Ofcourse t'shorrifyingo think hatbirdswhichfly through these fumes are going to fall dead, that thegas makes it impossible to grow anything for milesaround. But every age, after all, has called for itssacrifices, nd it's out of these thatsomething lse hasgrown. Citedn Manceaux 964,119)Antonioni's concern with the effects of modernityis founded on a perception that new technologies

MatthewGandyhave contributed towards a sense of humanalienation. This theme is developed by Antonioniin two principal ways: first, with the portrayal ofthe alienation of people from each other; andsecond, through the focus on alienation from'nature' in its broadest sense, which is moststrikingly represented in Red Desert through theoppressive characteristics of the industrial land-scape. Narrowly Weberian conceptions of modernalienation do not capture Antonioni's emphasis onthe psychological drama of alienation as a formof social redemption or creative renewal whichmay expand our imaginative grasp of place andspace (see Moore 1995, 23). The sense of alienationdeveloped by Antonioni is phenomenological andpsychological at root and is not developed in aneo-Marxian sense except in relation to his critiqueof consumer capitalism.14The existential emptinesswhich Antonioni associates with many aspects ofconsumer capitalism is developed in Red Desertthrough his tracking shots of rubbish-strewn wasteground, but for the most part the highly stylizedinteriors represent the acme of modernist minimal-ism. In one scene, Giuliana, Ugo and Corrado,walk by a polluted creek on the outskirts of thecity. Ugo comments in a matter-of-fact tone that'effluent must end up somewhere', and adds that'fishermen have abandoned this spot'. They jokeabout overhearing a man in a local restaurantcomplaining that his 'eel tasted of petroleum'.There is an air of resignation that pervades theirstroll along the riverbank. This eerie landscape,where there is scarcely a sound of bird song, is anecessary exchange for the technological dynam-ism and prosperity of modern Italy.Antonioni's ambivalence towards technology isdeveloped in Red Desert through a series of juxta-positions between pollution and wealth, derelictionand construction, and most tellingly, in the tensefriendship which develops between Giuliana andCorrado. In one striking sequence, Giuliana andCorrado are seen walking under a series of giantradio masts, which form part of the Medicina radarinstallation on the outskirts of Ravenna (Plate 1). Asite worker explains to Giuliana that these mastsare 'a radio-telescope to listen to the stars'. The tinyfigures we can see working high up within thesecomplex metal structures appear dwarfed by thevastness of the towers. There is something strange- mythical even - about these new and unfamiliarindustrial features in the Italian countryside. Butwhat conceptual vocabulary can we use to critically


7/21

Landscapesof deliquescence n MichelangeloAntonioni's Red Desert

I ,---.,i7w' '-/\ \`J ?

. . ,

?~ - ?I, o ..it..a,,~~~..''~a~ ,(?~~~~~~~~~~~~~.? - '.~,-

Plate 1 Michelangelo Antonioni (1964)RedDesert. Giuliana (MonicaVitti) and Corrado RichardHarris)attheMedicinaradioinstallationSource:Courtesyof the BritishFilmInstitute,London

engage with the industrial aesthetics of RedDesert?These human artefacts are not just 'things' in thelandscape, but they have been transformed byAntonioni into something far more mysteriousand laden with symbolic meaning. The scale andpower of these new structures is suggestive ofthe 'sublime' as a particular category of aestheticengagement with landscape. In its classic Kantianformulation, the sublime is used primarily in rela-tion to the aesthetic experience of nature, but in thewritings of Edmund Burke and in the formulationsof more recent scholars, the concept has beenextended to encompass the scale of human arte-facts in the landscape such as machines, buildingsand vast industrial installations. For Kant, the dif-ference between the beautiful and the sublimerests on a distinction between a bounded object ofcontemplation and 'a formless object' which hasthe capacity to extend the power of the human

imagination. The ideal of beauty in nature 'carrieswith it a purposiveness in its form', whereas anobjectof sublime contemplation mayappearto be contrapurposiveor our powerof judg-ment,unsuitableorourfacultyof presentation,nd asit were doing violence to our imagination, but isneverthelessudgedall themoresublime orthat.(Kant2000,129;?? 23-29; eealsothe 1960edition)15

The Kantian sublime is at root a philosophicalstate-of-being in the world rather than an identifi-able set of objects or sensory stimuli. We mightgo further and suggest that it is the quality ofthe sublime as an 'anti-landscape', to use Lyotard'sapt term, that places the mysterious qualities ofindustrial landscapes in the realm of a sublimeaesthetic that lies at the boundary of humancomprehension. Or to put it in a slightly differentway, the Kantian concept of the sublime is rooted

223


8/21

224in an aesthetic that is capable of transcending anynarrow association with pantheistic impulses inEuropean romanticism (see Lyotard 1994, 54). Theaesthetic characterof an industrial landscape owesits geometry to a mix of abstract and concreteelements that are combined to produce new spatialformations. The contemporary resonance of thesublime can be attributed to the intellectualdisjuncture between our aesthetic and cognitiveabilities to read these kinds of modern spaces.If we develop the idea of the sublime beyond itseighteenth-century roots, we can identify an inter-connection between the experience of the sublimeand the cinematic landscape. The concept of thesublime helps us to locate Antonioni's handling ofthe Italian landscape within a historically specificcultural dynamic emerging from the engagementbetween the visual arts and the experience ofmodernity. Given the centrality of landscape toAntonioni's cinema, it is surprising that so littleattention has been placed on the sublime as aconceptual vantage point from which to evaluatethe significance of his work. Discussion of thecinematic sublime has thus far tended to focus onthe imaginary vistas of science fiction film. ScottBukatman (1995, 273), for example, traces the cine-matic sublime in science fiction cinema to the vastcanvasses of the nineteenth-century Luminists andthe Hudson Valley school of painting, where wefind a distinctively American fusion of nature andtechnology.16 'The mix of the sublime and thetranscendental',notes Bukatman, 'found its clearestexpression in the genre of Luminist painting,which emphasized impersonal expression, hori-zontality, minute tonal gradations, intimate scale,immobility, and silence'. The luminist emphasis onsilence and emptiness can be contrasted with theeschatological themes of the Hudson Valley schoolwith their focus on the scale and power of nature.In the paintings of Albert Bierstadt, Thomas Coleand Frederic Edwin Church, for instance, we findimmense dioramic depictions of the Americanlandscape which are rooted in powerful myths ofdivine providenceand nationbuilding.ForBukatman,these different aspects of the nineteenth-centurysublime are combined in American science fictioncinema to produce a distinctive synthesis where'our fantasies of superiority emerge from ourambivalence regarding technologicalpower, ratherthan nature's might' (1995,279). The awe-inspiringlandscapes of Stanley Kubrick's 2001 (1968), forinstance, can be conceived as typical of this genre

MatthewGandyof technological mastery over nature and celestialspace. Antonioni's cinematic sublime is not, how-ever, founded on the same mix of nationalist andtechnocratic fervour, but develops a more melan-cholic vision closer to the German origins ofromanticism and the philosophical elaborationsof Immanuel Kant and Arthur Schopenhauer.Schopenhauer, for example, elaborates on Kantianaesthetics to develop a universal ontology of humantragedy, where all happiness and fulfilment areillusory. He introduces a profound sense of pessim-ism into modern philosophical discourse, whichis further developed in the 'resignationism' ofNietzsche and the twentieth-century existentialismof Camus, Heidegger and Sartre. Schopenhauer'semphasis on the non-mimetic arts, particularlymusic, stems from his belief in the extraordinarypower of art that engages with metaphysicalthemes. It is this sense of a threshold betweenartistic creation and the recognition of humaninsignificance that drives Schopenhauer's 'roman-tic pessimism' and provides an insight into thecomplex aesthetic vision of Antonioni with its pro-found sense of loss and alienation.17 The cinemaof Antonioni develops the romantic motif of indi-vidual alienation expressed through a heightenedsensory experience of the world as an aestheticresolution or consolation for the emotional priva-tions of a 'technologized' modernity. The conceptof the technological sublime, though only partiallydeveloped, is relevant to the interpretation ofAntonioni's work in three respects: first, it providesan unusual synthesis of the Burkean emphasis onhuman artifice with the Kantian emphasis on thecontemplation of nature;second, it highlights Anto-nioni's interest in aesthetic experiences associatedwith spatial disorientation through his explorationof the encountersbetween the interiorpsychologicallandscapes of his cinematic protagonists and theirdisconcerting experiences of concrete spaces; andthird, following revisionist readings of the sublime,we might link Antonioni's pre-occupation withperceptual disorientation to anxieties over the dis-turbance of a masculinist spatial realm.18Antonioni plays with the idea of the sublime bydisrupting the possibilities for any straightforwardinterpretationof what we see. In an early scene, forexample, a fast-moving cloud of steam surges hori-zontally across the screen like a pyroclastic surgeand threatens to engulf everything in its path. Thebursts of steam which periodically obscure ourview during Red Desert can be conceived as a literal


9/21

Landscapesf deliquescencen Michelangelontonioni'sRed Desertrepresentation of the power of modernity, but atthe same time they reflect the processes of 'abstrac-tion, reduction and dematerialization' which con-tributed towards the implosion of modernismduring the 1960s (Clark 2002, 156). The extensivedeployment of fog and mist also adds to the aes-thetic tensions within the film as the landscape isrepeatedly distilled down to an indistinct form inwhich all traces of human life threaten to disappearcompletely. In one instance, we see a huge ship,partially obscured by mist, moving behind a row ofpine trees as if it were a train on land. In anotherinstance, Giuliana faces four of her friends on ajetty, but a thick fog descends so that the figuresmomentarily disappear completely from view. Inthese and other scenes, Antonioni tests the limits ofour perception so that there is a continual tensionbetween what we can see and our imaginativegrasp of events. In articulating the anxiety thatthese moments induce for Giuliana, the film alsoexplores the aesthetic dimensions to spatial phobiasassociated with modernity. At one level, therefore,Red Desert is an exploration of 'the landscapes offear and the topographies of despair created asa result of modern technological and capitalistdevelopment' (Vidler 2000, 2). Yet the film is notonly a representation of 'spatial psychosis', sincewe are presented with an ambivalent aestheticexperience of industrial landscapes as a source ofvisual pleasure as well as fear or dread.19The sublime is not a transhistorical category ofaesthetic experience in the cinema of Antonioni,but something far more specific: a powerful per-ceptual device for the articulation of a particularkind of spatial longing or Sehnsucht.Antonioni'sconcern with the 'horizon of events' is predicatedon two rather different but interrelated perspect-ives: an intense focus on the concrete spaces ofhuman thought and action;and a struggle to articu-late an abstract space at the boundary of humancognitive and imaginative possibilities. The pervas-ive restlessness and narrative irresolution of RedDesert is a reflection of the kind of social andcultural tensions engendered by the rapidity anduneven effects of Italian modernity. This is notto suggest that the visual splendour of Red Desertis merely a reflection of the particularities ofAntonioni's neo-romantic aesthetic sensibility, butrather to emphasize how the film illuminates thelimitations of modernist aesthetics. In Kantianterms, the realm of physical objects in Red Desert isrepeatedly transmuted by the power of the human

imagination into a conceptual form. The cinematiclandscape radically extends the conceptual possibil-ities of the sublime by reworking the visual rep-resentation of spatio-temporal transcendence andat the same time blurring the distinctions betweendifferent realms of cultural production. Cinemaplays a vital role in liberating the experience of thesublime from the realm of social exclusivity. Afocus on the cinematic sublime does not necessarilylead, therefore, to critical closure, but has thepotential to open the interpretation of film to amultitude of different possibilities. This idea of athreshold between form and concept also providesan important link between the philosophicalorigins of the sublime and the development ofnon-figurative art in the twentieth century. Leadingfigures within the emergence of abstract expres-sionism such as BarnettNewman and MarkRothko,for example, perceived clear links between theirwork and the experience of sublimity. The aestheticengagement between modernist abstraction and'sublimation' saw a move away from 'the material,the tactile, the objective' and involved an attemptto articulate metaphysical themes drawn fromprimordial conceptions of human creativity (seeKrauss 1993, 247). It is in the post-war modernistdrive towards abstraction that we find the focalpoint in Red Desert for an engagement betweencinema and wider developments in the visual arts.Fulvous modernities

I want to paint the film as one paints a canvas; I wantto invent colour relationships, and not limit myselfby photographing only natural colours. (MichelangeloAntonioni, cited in Strick (1963, 7))

The vivid use of colour in Red Desert is used toportray not only the iridescent qualities of theindustrial landscape, but also to heighten ouridentificationwith the visual acuity of the main pro-tagonist Giuliana (Plate 2). At an early stage in thefilm we learn that Giuliana is convalescing after acar accident which has left her psychologicallydamaged. One of the consequences of her accid-ent is that she has become much more aware ofthe aesthetic characteristics of her surroundings:'What do people expect me to do with my eyes?',implores Giuliana, 'What should I look at?'. Infocusing on the alteredstate of Giuliana,we find thatAntonioni has deployed an established romantictrope of illness and suffering as a means towardsheightened states of creative insight. 'No two people

225


10/21

Matthew Gandy

Plate 2 Michelangelo Antonioni (1964) Red Desert. Much of the film is focused on the enhanced aesthetic sen-sibilities of Giuliana (Monica Vitti) towards the places and landscapes of modern RavennaSource: Courtesy of the Museum of Modern Art, New York

see things in quite the same way', notes Antonioni,'and what you see is going to depend on yourmental condition' (cited in Manceaux 1964, 119).20The vibrant cinematography in Red Desert allowsAntonioni to develop his earlier explorations of

perception in new ways. For eighteenth-centurysubjectivists such as David Hume, the perceptionof colour was little more than a 'phantasm of thesenses', but subsequent philosophical enquiry fromKant onwards has sought to bring the experienceof colour within a workable intellectual frame-work. For studies of human perception, the senseof colour plays a critical role because this aspect ofvision is not reducible to the physiological char-acteristics of the human eye alone, but involvescognitive dimensions to sensory experience as astructured process of apperception. Colour is, inother words, a complex visual language that com-

bines subjectivist aspects to human experience witha system of shared meaning acquired through lan-guage. Yet the human eye can perceive a vast rangeof colours - ten million by some estimates - whichfar exceeds our mental schemas for the naming ofindividual colours.21 'The weakness of both empiricismand intellectualism', writes the phenomenologistMerleau-Ponty, 'lies in their refusing to recognizeany colours other than those fixed qualities whichmake their appearance in a reflective attitude,whereas colour in living perception is a way intothe thing' (1962, 305). Merleau-Ponty continues:

We must rid ourselves of the illusion, encouraged byphysics, that the perceived world is made up of colourqualities ... The real colour persists beneath appear-ances as the background persists beneath the figure,that is, not as a seen or thought-of quality, but througha non-sensory presence. (Merleau-Ponty 1962,305)

226


11/21

Landscapesfdeliquescencen Michelangelo ntonioni'sRed DesertThough phenomenologists such as Merleau-Pontyare right to dismiss mere subjectivism or thepositivist trappings of 'scientism' in the realm ofcolour perception, their framing of the culturalmeaning and historical resonance of colour withintwentieth-century visual culture remains limited.The shift from black and white to colour cinemato-graphy, for example, had important implicationsfor the status of film within the visual arts andraised similar dilemmas to the demise of silentmovies in the 1920s. The closer the cinematicmedium came to the emulation of physical reality,in a narrowly figurative or representational sense,the less it was considered capable of articulatingprofound meaning on a par with other forms ofartistic or creative expression (see Koch 2000).These tensions between modernist aesthetics,'realism' and popular culture provide a furthercontext in which to consider how Red Desertexplores the aesthetic 'unreality' of forms of spatialestrangement associated with modern landscapes.Colour is used in RedDesert to provide a literalrepresentation of the chromatic dissonance ofmodernity, ranging from the translucent hues ofdiscarded plastic bottles to fluorescent puddlesof yellow water. This 'invasion of colour' is forAntonioni (1964b, 253) an integral aspect tomodernity. Yet 'natural' variations in colour arenot enough: in order to emphasize the intensity ofthe aesthetic experience in Red Desert, Antonionidirectly altered colours to achieve his desired effectby painting trees, buildings and other features inthe film.22The deliberate artificiality of colour inRed Desert mimics the technological artifice of theindustrial landscape and also emphasizes the com-plexities of colour perception. Equally, Antonioni'sextensive deployment of variations in exposure,depth of field, colour filters and intentionallyblurred sequences, underpins the extent to whichRed Desert is an experimental film where 'thecharacters are lost in a world of artifice' (Wollen2001, 4). The repeated use of a narrow focal range,for example, enables Antonioni to emphasize veryspecific elements in the frame, such as a humanface or the surface of a wall. In so doing, our atten-tion is shifted between different elements in thelandscape and there is a clear break with anyattempt to emulate cinematic realism in its narrowsense.In Red Desert we find a sustained criticalengagement with developments in architecture,design and the visual arts. The film makes reference

to a myriad of different influences ranging fromthe deserted agora of Giorgio de Chirico to thescarred and fractured landscapes of GiacomoBalla, Umberto Boccioni and Mario Sironi. Ofparticular interest, however, is the extensiveinfluence of abstract expressionism in Red Desert.The sparse interiors repeatedly allude to the artof Jackson Pollock, Barnett Newman and MarkRothko, with splashes, stripes and blocks of colourused to transform austere spaces into sites ofintense creativity (Plate 3). But what does thismimicry of abstract expressionism reveal about therelationship between film and art? We know, forexample, that Pollock and his contemporaries werefearful that their work might be perceived aspurely decorative. If their work was seen as 'mereabstraction' then the serious intellectual basis totheir art would be lost (Krauss 1985, 237). ForRosalindKrauss,the driving forcebehind twentieth-century abstraction has been the dialecticalimpulse to depict 'Nothing'. 'The second greatwave of visual abstractionists,' she writes, 'whichis to say postwar painters and most prominentlythe abstract expressionists, instinctively under-stood this Nothing, this dialectical signified'(Krauss 1985, 238). The metaphysical void that liesat the heart of Antonioni's cinema is exploredthrough his phenomenological exploration of thelimits of human creativity and perception. Anto-nioni develops an engagement between moderncinema and the visual arts in order to develop'ways of expression that are absolutely free, as freeas painting that has reached abstraction' (cited inArrowsmith 1995, 2). Yet Antonioni's interpreta-tion of the critical significance of abstract expres-sionism is rooted in a Greenbergian conception ofaesthetic autonomy and the teleological develop-ment of modern art. For Clement Greenberg, theroots of abstract expressionism could be identifiedin relation to a cultural lineage of 'Western civili-zation' founded in a steady progression of differ-ent modes of creative expression towards higherlevels of sophistication.23The dominance of Green-berg's art criticism in the 1940s and 1950s providedpowerful intellectual support to the perceivedhegemony of American abstraction as the leadingedge of modernist culture. Greenberg provideda 'system through which to think the field ofmodern art' which conceived 'the field of art asat once timeless and in constant flux' (Krauss 1985,1). Modernist abstraction became caught up inan impetus towards universal, teleological and

227


12/21

228 MatthewGandy1 ',

I

.I I

i, ' I

Plate 3 MichelangeloAntonioni (1964)RedDesert.Giuliana(MonicaVitti) andone of the abstract nteriorsSource:Courtesyof the Museumof ModernArt,New York

transhistorical modes of critical interpretation thatcombined the neo-romantic 'mystique of creation'with an emphasis on the intensely individualizedpsychological drama of modernist expressionism.In this sense Red Desertcan be interpreted as a self-conscious attempt to articulate 'high modernism'through the medium of film. With these diverseculturalreferencesto abstractart,as well as develop-ments in architecture,design and even avant-gardeelectronic music, Antonioni presents us with a kindof cinematic Gesamtwerk hat seeks to provide asynthesis of all the arts into a complete work ofmodern art.During the 1950s, the work of American artistssuch as Jackson Pollock and Robert Motherwellwas widely perceived as a continuation and refine-ment of European modernism. The theme of creat-ive 'freedom' was extensively elaborated throughthe critical writings of Clement Greenberg, Meyer

Schapiro and other leading exponents of Americanabstraction. American art was perceived as 'thelogical culmination of a long-standing and inexor-able tendency towards abstraction' in which 'whathad been characteristicallyAmerican now becamerepresentative of Western culture as a whole'(Guilbaut 1983, 177). We now know, however, thatAmerican abstract art received significant logisticaland financial support from the US government andwas coopted as part of a 'cultural front' during theCold War. The CIA-backed exhibitions that touredFrance,Italy and other politically unstable Westerndemocracies during the 1950s had a profoundimpact on the future development of European artand consolidated the perceived cultural hegemonyof New York over Paris. The influential exhibi-tion New AmericanPainting (1958-9), for example,travelled to virtually every major European cityand the work of Willem de Kooning reached the


13/21

LandscapesfdeliquescencenMichelangelontonioni'sRed DesertVenice Biennale as early as 1948. We know fromAntonioni's interviews and writings that thesedevelopments had a profound impact: he evenmade a studio visit to Mark Rothko and commis-sioned one of his paintings (see Chatman 1985, 54).He would also have been familiar with a variety ofEuropean responses to abstract expressionismdeveloped by figures such as Jean Dubuffet, Wols,Alberto Burriand the 'Art Informel'.24In essence, Antonioni adopts a neo-romanticstance in relation to abstract expressionism thatfocuses on its non-figurative spontaneity and creat-ive freedom without engaging with the widerpolitical and intellectual complexities of post-warmodernism. This neo-romantic dimension to RedDesert is exemplified by the emphasis on natureas a source of both 'authenticity' and creativerenewal. The emphasis on the embodied dimen-sions to perception underpins the extent to whichRed Desert presents a phenomenological responseto the experience of landscape. It also highlightsthe degree to which the landscapes of Red Deserttake on strongly anthropomorphic qualities inorder to emphasize the distinctions between 'nat-ural' and 'artificial' modes of perception.25This isbest illustrated in Giuliana's imaginary landscapesequence, where she relates a story to her youngson. We are immersed in a 'natural' experience ofcolour, which profoundly disturbs the 'industrial'colours used elsewhere in the film. Giulianadescribes how 'the sea was transparent and thecoral was pink', yet the depiction of gulls, cormor-ants and even rabbits suggests that this somewhatincongruous mix of elements is closer to a half-remembered Mediterranean scene than any accur-ate depiction of a tropical atoll (the distinctive pinksand was in fact filmed on Budello Island off thecoast of Sardinia). Like the phenomenon of 'con-densation' in dreams, we are confronted with vari-ous fragments of experience and memory woveninto some kind of narrative coherence. A younggirl swims in the sea and observes the different fea-tures of the landscape as they are related byGiuliana. A strange voice can be heard singing (thesame voice that we hear during the title sequenceof the film). 'A little cove among the rocks' saysGiuliana, 'She had never realized they were likeflesh. And the voice ... at that moment the voicewas so sweet'. 'Who was singing?' asks her child.'Everything was singing. Everything', repliesGiuliana. The camera pans slowly across anexpanse of flesh-coloured rocks, which resemble

the desert landscapes of Georgia O'Keefe. This softand rounded anthropomorphic landscape contrastswith the poisoned and jagged environs of Ravenna.This is a landscape which for Antonioni 'showsreality as Giuliana wishes it were - that is, differentfrom the world that appears to her as transformed,alienated, obsessive to the point of being mon-strously deformed' (1964b,254). The tropical beachsequence also challenges any simplistic assumptionthat the entire film is simply a reflection ofGiuliana's perspective or even the vision of thedirector himself: the jarringjuxtaposition of differ-ent scenographies, whether material or imagined,underlies the fractured and alienated human rela-tionships towards landscape that are depicted inthe film.If we survey critical responses to cinema in the1960s, we find a tension emerging between thoseauthors who saw purely visual cinematic experi-mentation of the kind seen in Red Desertas a threatto the established narrative conventions of cinemaand an alternative perspective, principally devel-oped in Europe, which sought to raise the statusof cinema within the visual arts. The ideologicaldimensions to cinematic representation lie at theheart of this dispute, since the prevalence of auter-ist modes of critical exposition suppressed thepolitical and historical significance of film as acultural artefact.With the deepening politicizationof cultural discourse in the 1960s, new life wasbreathed into the earlier critical interventions ofBalazs, Benjamin,Kracauerand other radical theor-ists of visual culture. The innovative structure andscenography of Antonioni's cinema proved pivotalto this new emphasis on the theoretical sophistica-tion and critical significance of film within thevisual arts. This shift in the scope and dynamics offilm criticism was reflected in leading film journalssuch as Cahiersdu Cinemaand Screen that enthusi-astically embraced new developments in Europeancinema and provided a forum for film theoristsinformed by debates in anthropology, linguisticsand other disciplines. Andr6 Bazin (1967, 168), forexample, sensed that film had the potential to offerart 'a new form of existence'. 'The film of a paint-ing', countered Bazin, 'is an aesthetic symbiosis ofscreen and painting, as is the lichen of the algaeand mushroom'. Bazin's emphasis on cinema ascultural synthesis anticipates the interventions ofRoland Barthes,Peter Wollen and a wave of criticalscholarship emerging during the 1970s whichbegan to articulate a much more sophisticated

229


14/21

230account of the iconic significance of cinematicimages.26Cinema was now conceived as part of awider field of cultural production that extendedfrom the audience to a nexus of social, economicand also technological structures. Barthes, forexample, extended his literary insights to theexploration of visual culture and dispelled notionsof unity and consistency in the creation of mean-ing. Barthes insisted that the subtlety of meaningin the cinema of Antonioni enhanced its politicalpoignancy and at the same time protected his workfrom becoming a mere 'instrument of power' (citedin Brunette 1998, 13). This emphasis on the com-plexity of film is also developed in the writing ofWollen, who brought a greater level of sophistica-tion to film criticism commensurate with the newlyinvigorated status of film within the visual arts andin clear distinction to the naive theoretical excep-tionalism of early contributors to semiological andstructuralist analysis. Wollen, for example, sug-gests that any iconographic analysis of cinemamust be sensitive to three interrelated realms ofmeaning: the symbolic (myth), the iconic (visualpleasure) and the indexical (mimesis of concretereality) (see Wollen 1972). The lasting value ofWollen's conceptual schema, like that of Kracauer,is to contextualize film as a cultural form embeddedin a wider set of social and political dynamicswithout diminishing the richness of cinema as afocus for critical inquiry. 'The film-maker', notesWollen (1972, 154), 'is fortunate to be working inthe most semiologically complex of all media, themost aesthetically rich.' The cinema of Antonioniwas easily assimilated in this critical shift fromauterist to more structurally complex modes ofcritical inquiry during the 1970s and has remaineda focal point for intersections between film andphilosophy ever since.The oblique narrativestructures employed in thecinema of Antonioni anticipate a shift in criticalfilm discourse from its earlier focus on linguisticsto a more multi-faceted conception of cinema as akind of 'social technology' (see de Lauretis 1984).In Red Desert, Antonioni extends modernist aes-thetics through a radical industrial synthesis thatprefigures the extensive blurring of boundariesthat would ultimately contribute towards thedemise of modernism as a rarefied cultural realm.Gilles Deleuze (1989, 5-9), for example, chroniclesa shift in Antonioni's cinema from the 'discon-nected space' of his earlier films to the 'empty ordeserted space' of L'eclisse (1962) onwards. For

MatthewGandyDeleuze, these non-Euclidean and amorphousspaces reflect a crucial juncture in visual culturebetween the 'movement-image' and the 'time-image' that denotes a different kind of historicalpossibility for the cinematic imagination. Theassimilation of Antonioni within a deconstructivistcinematic canon is difficult to reconcile, however,with the self-conscious attachment of cinematic'high modernism' to well established cultural tenetswithin Western humanism. Though couched inthe visual language of ambiguity, the cinema ofAntonioni remains firmly grounded in a dichoto-mous arrangement of cultural coordinates rangingfrom gender to technology. The essentializedtopography of sexual difference in RedDesertis, forexample, a corollary of Antonioni's phenomeno-logical search for the 'essence' of aesthetic experi-ence as a metaphysical dimension to nature. And,from a contemporary neo-Marxian perspective, thefilms of Antonioni play a transitional role withinan emerging 'geopolitical aesthetic', to use FredericJameson's (1992) term, wherein cinema takes onan increasingly polyvalent and allegorical form.Jameson's (1992, 1) concern with the 'residues ofthe modern' places European cinema within aglobal arena of cultural and political transforma-tion in which different conceptions of cinematicmodernity vie for historical significance in the faceof a threatened cultural erasure. Yet, in adoptingthe terminology of Jameson and contemporaryneo-Marxian film criticism, we should be carefulnot to substitute the structuralist analysis of thepast with a new constellation of deterministic ele-ments. It is the complexity of RedDesert that lendsthe film such rich possibilities for exploring thechanging meaning and significance of film in mod-ernist culture.ConclusionsThe representation of industrial landscapes in RedDesertprovides an insight into the complexities ofcultural modernism in Italy during the social andeconomic transformations of the 1950s and early1960s. The film reflects a shift in Antonioni's workfrom his earlier association with Italian neo-realismtowards an exploration of the existential dilemmasthat lie at the heart of the post-war Fordist modelof Italian prosperity. What Antonioni (1964b, 254)refers to as the 'malaise of progress' is moststrikingly explored through the fragile mental stateof the film's main protagonist as she encounters


15/21

Landscapesfdeliquescencen Michelangelontonioni'sRed Desertdifferent facets to this strange new landscape. Thedisorientating and unfamiliar locales used in RedDesertserve as a powerful motif to raise questionsabout the effects of modernity that range fromthe aesthetic characteristics of industrial land-scapes to sensations of spatial displacement. Thesedisordered spaces provoke deep ambivalence intheir inhabitants as they traverse the remnants offamiliar landscapes strewn with the debris ofmodernity. 'The present is always wanting,' writesZygmunt Bauman, 'which makes it ugly, abhorrentand unendurable. The present is obsolete ... Themoment it lands in the present, the coveted futureis poisoned by the toxic effluvia of the wasted past'(1991, 11). In many of the critical responses to thecinema of Antonioni, however, these themes are alltoo often explored, not in relation to the distinctivecharacteristics of twentieth-century modernity, butrather as ciphers for existential commentaries onfractured human experience. Much of the existingliterature on Antonioni has tended to interpret hisfilms in terms of a set of putative universal aspectsto human experience. We have seen how trans-cendent perspectives tend towards transhistoricalor even neo-romantic conceptions of place andspace that obscure the historical and geographicalspecificity of cinematic landscapes. Antonioni'sdesire 'to capture a certain truth of the landscape'(cited in Brunette 1998, 97) is predicated on asearch for primal aesthetic energies inscribed in thelandscape that he uses to reflect the psychologicalstates of his cinematic protagonists.The cinema of Antonioni reveals much about thecontradictory dimensions to what we might term'high modernism' and its various manifestationsin the visual arts during the 1960s. Antonioni'sconception of the relationship between the visualarts and wider social and political developmentsremains trapped in a narrowly Greenbergianinter-pretation of the development of cultural modern-ism. In the final analysis, however, Antonioni'ssearch for 'pure cinema' is predicated on a concep-tion of creative autonomy and teleological progres-sion within the visual arts which has now beensuperseded by more sophisticated bodies of criticalanalysis. The blurring of perceptual boundaries inRedDesertleads us towards the cinematic sublimeas a powerful conceptual link between the neo-romantic apprehension of nature and the aestheticexperience of modern cinema. By developing theconcept of the sublime in relation to modern land-scapes, we can begin to locate cinematic repres-

entations of spatio-temporal transcendence withinan identifiable genealogy of landscape aesthetics.The experience of the sublime in the cinema ofAntonioni takes us beyond the eighteenth-centurydistinctions between 'beauty' and the 'sublime'.These oppositionalcategoriesare no longer adequateto account for the complexity and irrationality ofmodern space, since the experience of the sublimeitself has become fractured into new kinds of spa-tial disorder (see Nesbitt 1995). The shifting focusfrom 'natural' or even quasi-natural landscapes tomodern landscapes requires a more complex set ofanalytical tools than the classical trope of aesthetictheory can provide. The discourse is no longerbetween beauty and the sublime, or even betweennature and culture, but between categories of thesublime and different kinds of conceptual configura-tion. The modern landscape transcends binaryconceptualizations of either landscape change orthose categories of thought employed to mouldcomplex phenomena into pre-existing analyticalforms. In Red Desert, modern landscapes becomea source of profound mental anguish as if everyfeature has become transmuted into a threateningpresence within Giuliana's fragile psyche. If thelandscapes of modern Ravenna and its environshave been anthropomorphized, it is a mechanizedembodiment of living machines that forms thedominant visual motif rather than fleeting repres-entations of human form.The move away from narrative convention inRed Desert can be interpreted as a cinematic corol-lary of the shift towards non-figurative art. Itplaces Antonioni within a cinematic tradition influ-enced principally by painting in contrast with amore literary cinematic avant-garde.27It could beargued that Red Desertdisplays some of the charac-teristics of avant-garde cinema as set out in Ger-main Dulac's classic definition with her emphasison films, 'whose techniques, employed renewedexpressiveness of image and sound, break withestablished tradition to search out, in the strictlyvisual and auditory realm, new emotional chords',and on filmmakers who, 'detached from motives ofprofit, marchboldly on towards the conquest of thenew modes of expression ... to expand cinematicthought' (cited in Hoberman 1984, 59). Yet in manyrespects Red Desert was a mainstream film in itsday: it achieved significant commercial success; itwas widely distributed; and it paved the way forAntonioni's three-picturedeal with Metro GoldwynMayer studios. In commercial terms, therefore, we

231


16/21

232cannot claim that Red Desert is an example of anavant-garde film, but it is undeniable that the filmbreaks new ground in terms of the aesthetic scopeand complexity of modern cinema. For JohnHoberman it was only in 'the twilight of modern-ism', during the late 1960s and early 1970s, that 'anauthentically modernist avant-garde came intoexistence' (1984,64) through the work of filmmakerssuch as Stan Brakhage and Michael Snow. In con-trast, Antonioni's Red Desert leads in a differentdirection and prefigures a process of institutional-ization and coalescence between cinema and thevisual arts that would develop into the 'commer-cial avant-garde' of the 1970s represented by, forexample, the New German Cinema and militantThird World cinema.Over the last 25 years, the European art film hasfound itself increasingly marginalized in theoret-ical, political and commercial terms: the auteristvision is at odds with much contemporary culturaldiscourse; many well-established directors havefaced difficulties in distributing their work; and theidea of the film director (or artist) as social or polit-ical commentator now carries far less credence.This period has seen the decline and decay ofEuropean film culture both as a mode of culturalproduction and as a significant dimension to publiclife, as countless former art-house cinemas havedisappeared or lie in ruins (see Barber2002). Eventhe corporate studio system and its vast multiplexdistribution networks are struggling to maintain agrip on the consumption of visual culture as newforms of film production and distribution colonizethe cultural interstices of the contemporary city.Yet the idea of critical or artisticautonomy remainsof vital significance for the visual arts: the fact thatAntonioni resisted studio diktat or audience grati-fication in the development of his work is animportant element in its enduring appeal. In 1958,for example, he stated that 'one does not work forthe public' (cited in Leprohon 1963, 11) and hiswork with MGM studios ended in acrimony afterthe political storm of ZabriskiePoint (1969) and thecommercial disappointment of ThePassenger 1975).A range of cultural commentators from PierreBourdieu to Susan Sontag have sought to promotethe idea of an autonomous creative sphere which isnot open to political or economic manipulation.The expense and complexity of film production hasmade it especially vulnerable to these pressures,yet Red Desert remains a testament to the creativepossibilities of modern cinema. Antonioni's fascina-

MatthewGandytion with the 'deliquescence' of the industriallandscape derives from his exploration of the shift-ing boundary between cultural and economic pro-duction as devalorized fragments of the landscapeacquire new meaning as a focus of reverie and con-templation. That Antonioni aspires towards a formof universalist or even metaphysical abstraction inhis cinematic landscapes tells us much about thetrajectory and limitations of modernist aestheticsand the centrality of cinema to any sustainedengagement with the cultural legacy of twentieth-century modernism.

AcknowledgementsI am grateful for the detailed and thoughtful com-ments received from the referees. Thanks also toDonnatella Bernstein for assistance with the trans-lation of Italian sources and to Peter Wollen forsharing some of his insights from working withAntonioni in the mid-1970s. Embryonicversions ofthis paper were given to various audiences, includ-ing the Landscapeand Politics conference held atthe University of Edinburgh in 2001 and the TodSpieker Colloquium Series in the Department ofGeography at the University of California-LosAngeles in 2002.

Notes1 In Clark's (1999) survey of modernismhe placesexamplesof Italianneo-realist inemaat the leadingedge of modernistculturejust beforeits implosionand decline in the 1960s.2 Berger's close engagement with Antonioni's repres-entation of landscape underlies the degree to whichhis work has been taken seriously by a variety ofscholarsfrom diverse disciplinary backgrounds.RolandBarthes, Gilles Deleuze and Frederic Jameson, for

example, have all at various times drawn on thecinema of Antonioni in order to develop their theoret-ical reflections on the development of visual culture.3 Cited in Steimatsky (1995, 32). Kracauer's observa-tion was made in relation to the films of RobertoRosselini.

4 Key sources on landscape as a historically specificinterplay between social and aesthetic perspectivesinclude Barrell (1980 1993), Cosgrove (1998), Daniels(1989), Schama (1995) and Williams (1973). See alsothe edited collections by Mitchell (1994) and Wredeand Adams (1991).5 Recent examples of the study of the cinematic land-scape include Barber (2002), Bruno (2002), Clarke(1997),Shiel and Fitzmaurice (2001 2003), Foot (1999),


17/21

Landscapesof deliquescence n MichelangeloAntonioni's Red DesertGandy (1996a 1996b), Natter (1994) and Rohdie(2001).For the most part, however, these studies haveemerged outside of the disciplinary context of filmstudies and have drawn heavily on other areas ofscholarshipsuch as architecture, eographyand history.6 See Bruno (1993,4). In Bruno's study of Naples in thesilent films of Elvira Notari, she interweaves thehistorical and political context for Italian cinema witha sensitivity towards the corporeality of visual cul-ture and new methodological developments across arange of disciplines.7 See, for example, Ferretti (1989), Frisby (1986) andKoch (2000).8 For an overview of Italianneo-realismsee, for example,Bazin (1971), Bondanella (1994), Marcus (1986) andOverbey (1979). An alternative genealogy of earlyneo-realist cinema is provided by Bruno (1993). Forfurther details on the life and work of Antonioni see,for example, Barthes (1988), Bernardini (1967), Bru-nette (1998), Cowie (1963), del Rio (1996), Fonseca(1985), Goddard (1964), Goldman (1971), Jacobowitzand Lippe (1997), Micheli (1991), Perry and Preito(1986), Reynolds (1996), Rifkin (1982) and Rohdie(1990). Where appropriate I have referred to films inthis essay by the names that are best known to English-speaking audiences: unlike L'eclisse, or example, RedDesert is usually referred to by its translated title inmost Anglo-American publications.9 On literary influences in the cinema of Antonioni see,for example, Aristarco (1961)and Basting (1995).10 These historical and regional antecedents can berelated to an early emphasis on the use of locationshooting in Italian filmmaking. See, for example,Bruno (1993), Marcus (1986) and Steimatsky (1995).The role of the human figure in the cinematic land-scape is the focal point for Noa Steimatsky's (1995,276) study of landscape in Italian film. She concludesher analysis by suggesting that the frequent 'empty-ing out' of Antonioni's landscapes mark an importantdistinction from the 'figuration of the landscape' inthe films of his contemporaries such as Rossellini,Visconti and Pasolini. For greater detail on the polit-ical and economic dimensions to modern Italy see,for example, Atkinson and Cosgrove (1998), Forgacs(1986 1990).11 For an interesting overview of different criticalresponses to Antonioni's films in the 1960s and 1970s,see Brunette(1998).12 Antonioni cited in Tinazzi (1974,9). See also Antonioni(1964a).13 Author's translation. The original Italian reads: 'I1mito della fabbrica condiziona la vita di tutti, qui, laspoglia d'imprevisti, la scarnifica,il prodotto sinteticodomina, prima o poi finira per rendere gli alberioggetti antiquati, come I cavalli.'14 Antonioni's critique of consumer capitalism reachesits apotheosis in the finale to ZabriskiePoint (1969).

For greater detail on Marx's theory of alienationsee, for example, Axelos (1976), Meszaros (1970) andOilman (1976).15 For more detail on the concept of the sublime and itsapplicability to the arts see, for example, B6hme(1989),Crowther(19891992),Deleuze (1984),Freyssinet(2001), Gandy (1996a), Lyotard (1982 1984 1989 19911994), Monk (1935), Patterson (1999), Pries (1989),Pillow (2000), Riese (1998), Schaper (1992) and Vidler(1987). On Kantian conceptions of space see alsoGarnett (1965)and Parsons (1992).16 Bukatman echoes the insights of David Nye on theemergence of the 'American technological sublime' asa distinctively republicanaesthetic based on a celebra-tion of vast engineering projects such as bridges,dams and aqueducts (Nye 1994). See also Weiskel(1976), MacDonald (2001), Marx (1964 1991) andWilton and Barringer(2002).17 For greater detail on Schopenhauer's 'romantic pes-simism' see Foster (1999), Magee (1983), Janaway(1999), Simmel (1986), Soil (1998) and Tanner (1992).A range of authors have drawn attention to thephilosophical dimensions to Antonioni's cinema.Gilles Deleuze (1989, 95), for example, suggests thatAntonioni is the only director 'to have taken up theNietzschean project of a real critique of morality',whereas Frederic Jameson (1992, 20) draws attentionto Antonioni's 'Heidegerrian and metaphysicaldimension'. See also Elder (1991),Maunier (1995) andSchliesser (1998). We should note, however, thatSchopenhauer adds comparatively little to Kant'soriginal reflections on the meaning of the sublime,but is more significant with respect to the role of artin eliciting access to metaphysical sources of mean-ing. For a critique of the ideological implications ofromanticism in art see, for example, Eagleton (1990)and Gandy (1997).18 On the gendered dimensions to the sublime see, forexample, Yaeger (1992).19 On the aesthetic aspects of modern infrastructureandindustrial structures see, for example, Kaika andSwyngedouw (2000), Seidel (1993), Vidler (1994),Wigley (1993),Williams (1990)and Wollen (1997).20 Dalle Vache (1996, 47) suggests that Antonioni usesthe character of Giuliana in Red Desert as a form of'visual ventriloquism' in order to communicate the'director's female alter-ego'. In so doing, however,Dalle Vache presents a narrowly dualistic reading ofthe film based on a gendered differentiation between(male) rationality and (female) creativity that merelyreplicates Antonioni's own iconography of sexualdifference. In fact, she merely reiterates Pier PaoloPasolini's interpretation of Red Desert in his 1965essay on 'the cinema of poetry', where he argues thatthe director 'looks at the world by immersing himselfin his neurotic protagonist, reanimating the factsthrough her eyes ... becausehe has substituted n toto

233


18/21

234for the world view of a neurotichis own deliriousview ofaesthetics' Pasolini 1965, emphasis in original). If weaccept Dalle Vache's contention that Red Desert isa 'historical melodrama about the female condition'(p. 61) we effectively ignore feminist insights in filmcriticism that have developed since the 1960s.21 On the philosophy of colour see, for example, Hardin(1988), Hume (1965 [1757]), Merleau-Ponty (1962),Raffman(1988)and Sibley (1967).22 Antonioni even tried to paint a whole stretch of pineforest white but had to abandon the shoot the follow-ing day because the bright sunlight left the woods insilhouette thereby destroying the grey mise en scenethat he was trying to create (see Antonioni 1964c).Further debate over the significance of landscape inAntonioni's cinema can be found in, for example,Benayoun (1965),Bou (1995),Forgacs(2000),Scemama-Heard (1998)and Tomasulo (1993).23 On the significance of Clement Greenberg's writingssee, for example, Burger (1984), Clark (1982 1999),Foster (1996), Frascina and Harris (1992), Guilbaut(1990), Harris (1993), Krauss (1985 1993) and Wallis(1984).24 Other likely influences on Red Desert include neo-expressionist depictions of the new industrial land-scapes of modern Italy by, for example, FernandoFarulli and Arturo Tosi (see Bartoloni and Mennucci2001).25 On the 'physiognomy of landscape' in cinema see, forexample, Balazs (1972), Koch (1987) and Steimatsky(1995). On the phenomenology of space see, forexample, Merleau-Ponty (1962)and Kaelin (1966).

26 Key theoretical advances in film criticism thatemerged during this period include, for example,Heath (1981), Metz (1974 1982), Mulvey (1975) andWollen (1972).27 On the two cinematic avant-gardes see Wollen (1975).

ReferencesAntonioni M 1994 [1964a]II mio deserto in L'Europeo16August 1964) reprinted in di Carlo C and Tinazzi Geds Fareunfilm e permevivere: crittisul cinemaMarsilio,Venice 78-9Antonioni M 1994 [1964b] I1 deserto rosso. Interviewwith FrancoisMaurin in Humanitedimanche 23 Septem-ber 1964) reprinted in di Carlo C and Tinazzi G edsFare un film e per me vivere: scritti sul cinemaMarsilio,Venice 251-4Antonioni M 1978 [1964c] Il bosco bianco in di Carlo Ced IIdesertorosso2nd edn Cappelli, Bologna 80-4Aristarco G 1961 Literarycinema CinemaNuovo(January-February1961) reprinted and translated in Leprohon P1963 [1961] MichelangeloAntonioni:an introductionransScott Sullivan Simon and Schuster,New York 160-2Arrowsmith W 1995 Antonioni: poet of images OxfordUniversity Press, New York

Matthew GandyAtkinson D and Cosgrove D 1998 Urban rhetoric andembodied identities: city, nation, and empire at theVittorio Emanuele II Monument in Rome, 1870-1945Annalsof the Associationof AmericanGeographers8 28-49Axelos K 1976Alienation,praxisand techne n the thoughtofKarlMarxUniversity of Texas Press, AustinBalazs B 1972 [1952] Theory of film trans E Bone ArnoPress, New YorkBarber S 2002 Projectedcities: cinema and urban spaceReaktion,LondonBarrell J 1980 Thedarksideof thelandscape:he ruralpoor n

Englishpainting1730-1840 Cambridge University Press,CambridgeBarrell J 1993 The public prospect and the private view:the politics of taste in eighteenth-century Britain inKemal S and Gaskell I eds Landscape, aturalbeautyandthe arts CambridgeUniversity Press, Cambridge 81-103Barthes R 1988 CherAntonioni:1988-1989 Ente AutonomoGestione Cinema, Rome

Bartoloni V and Mennucci A 2001 L'immaginee laparola':Piero Santi e l'arte a Firenze dal 1950 al 1975Musei Civici di San Gimignano Galleria d'ArteModerna e Contemporanea 'Raffaele de Grada', SanGimignano

Basting B 1995 Im Labyrinth der Leidenschaften in du:Die Zeitschriftder Kultur 11 26-7Bauman Z 1991 Modernity and ambivalence Polity,CambridgeBazin A 1967 [c. mid-1950s] Cinema and painting inWhat s cinema?Volume trans Hugh Gray University ofCaliforniaPress, Berkeley CA 164-9Bazin A 1971 [1948] An aesthetic of reality: neorealism inWhat s cinema?Volume2 University of California Press,BerkeleyCA 16-40

Benayoun R 1965 Un cri dans le desert Positif66 43-59Berger J 1995 Madonna and the fog/Uber die Nebel vonFerrara n du:Die Zeitschriftder Kultur 11 14-15Bernardini A 1967 MichelangeloAntonioni:da Gentedel Poa Blow-UpEdizioni, RomeBohme H 1989 Das Steinerne: Anmerkungen zur Theoriedes Erhabenen aus dem Blick des 'Menschenfremdeste'

in Pries C ed Das Erhabene: wischenGrenzerfahrungndGrofienwahnWeinheimBondanella P 1994 Italian cinema: rom neorealism o thepresentContinuum, New YorkBorrelli A 1966 Neorealismo e marxismo Edizioni diCinemasud, AvellinoBou N 1995 Deserts, deserts urbans in Ball6 J ed ElSegle del CinemaCentre de Cultura Contemporania deBarcelona,Barcelona 88-92Brunette P 1998 The films of Michelangelo AntonioniCambridge University Press, CambridgeBruno G 1993 Streetwalking n a ruinedmap:culturaltheoryand the city films of Elvira Notari Princeton UniversityPress, PrincetonNJBruno G 2002 Atlas of emotion;ourneysin art, architectureandfilm Verso, London


19/21

Landscapesof deliquescence n Michelangelo Antonioni's Red DesertBukatman S 1995 The artificial infinite: on special effectsand the sublime in Cooke L and Wollen P eds Visual

display:culturebeyondappearances ay Press, Seattle WABurger P 1984 Theoryof the avante-gardeUniversity ofMinnesota Press, MinneapolisBurke E 1958 [1757]A philosophicalnquiry nto theoriginofour ideas of the sublime and the beautifulBoulton J edRoutledge and Kegan Paul, LondonCameron I and Wood R 1971 Antonioni Praeger, NewYork

Chatman S 1985 Antonioni, or the surface of the worldUniversity of CaliforniaPress, Berkeley CAClark T J 1982 Clement Greenberg's theory of art CriticalInquiry9 11-20Clark T J 1999 Farewell o an idea:episodes roma history ofmodernismYale University Press, New Haven CTClark T J 2002 Modernism, postmodernism and steamOctober100 154-74Clarke D B ed 1997 Thecinematiccity Routledge, London

Cosgrove D 1998 [1984] Socialformationand symbolic and-scape2nd edn University of Wisconsin Press, MadisonCowie P 1963Antonioni,Bergman,ResnaisTantivy, LondonCrowther P 1989 TheKantiansublime:from moralityto artClarendon Press, OxfordCrowther P 1992 Les immateriauxand the postmodernsublime in Benjamin A ed Judging LyotardRoutledge,London 192-205Dalle Vache A 1996 Michelangelo Antonioni's RedDesert:painting as ventriloquism and color as movement inCinemaand painting: how art is used in film Universityof Texas Press, Austin TX43-80Daniels S 1989 Marxism, culture, and the duplicity oflandscape in Peet R and ThriftN eds New models ingeographyvol 2 Unwin Hyman, London 196-220de Lauretis T 1984 Alice doesn't:feminism,semiotics,cinemaMacmillan, Londondel Rio E 1996 The technological imaginary in the cinemaof Antonioni, Godard and Atom Egoyan UnpublishedPhD dissertation University of California, BerkeleyCA

Deleuze G 1984 [1963]Kant'scriticalphilosophy:he doctrineof the faculties trans H Tomlinson and B HabberjamAthlone, LondonDeleuze G 1989 [1985] Cinema 2: the time-image rans HTomlinson and R Galeta Athlone, LondonEagleton T 1990 The ideology of the aestheticBlackwell,OxfordElder R B 1991 Antonioni's tragic vision Canadian ournalofFilm Studies1 1-34Ferretti S 1989 [1984] Cassirer,Panofsky,and Warburg:symbol,art, and history trans D Pierce Yale UniversityPress, New Haven CTFieschi J-A 1965 Pas de printemps pour la prisonniere dudesert Cahiersdu Cinema163 82-3Fonseca M S ed 1985 MichelangeloAntonioniCinematicaPortuguesa, LisbonFoot J 1999 Cinema and the city: Milan and Luchino Vis-

conti's Roccoand his brothersJournalof Modern ItalianStudies209-35Forgacs D 1986 RethinkingItalian fascism Lawrence andWishart,LondonForgacs D 1990 Italian culture in the industrial era 1880-1980: cultural ndustries,politicsand thepublicManchester

University Press, ManchesterForgacs D 2000 Antonioni: space, place, sexuality inKonstantarakos M ed Spacesin Europeancinema Intel-lect, Exeterand Portland 101-11Foster C 1999 Ideas and imagination: Schopenhaueron the proper foundation of art in Janaway C ed TheCambridgeompaniono Schopenhauer ambridge Univer-sity Press, Cambridge 213-51Foster H 1996 The returnof the real:the avant-garde t theendof thecenturyThe MITPress, Cambridge MAFrascina A and Harris J eds 1992 Art in modernculture:ananthologyof criticaltextsPhaidon, LondonFreyssinet E 2001 On the sublime Arq: architecturalresearchquarterly 249-53Frisby D 1986 Fragmentsof modernityThe MIT Press,Cambridge MAGandy M 1996aVisions of darkness: the representationofnature in the films of WernerHerzog Ecumene 1-21

Gandy M 1996b The heretical landscape of the body:Pier Paolo Pasolini and the scopic regime of Europeancinema Environment nd PlanningD: Societyand Space14293-310Gandy M 1997 Contradictorymodernities: conceptions ofnature in the art of Joseph Beuys and Gerhard RichterAnnalsof theAssociationof AmericanGeographers7 636-59Gandy M 2001 Paysage, esthetiques et ideologieGeographiet Cultures39 108-15Garnett C B 1939 The Kantianphilosophy f spaceColumbia

University Press, New YorkGoddard J-L 1964 La nuit, l'eclipse, l'aurore. Entretienavec Michelangelo Antonioni Cahiersdu Cindma 60 8-17Goldmann A 1971 Cinemaet societemoderne.Le cinemade1958 a 1968: Godard Antonioni- Resnais- Robbe-GrilletAnthropos, ParisGuilbaut S 1983 How New York tole the ideaof modernart:abstractexpressionism,reedom,and the Cold Wartrans AGoldhammer University of Chicago Press, Chicago ILGuilbaut S ed 1990 Reconstructingmodernism: rt in NewYork, Paris and Montreal 1945-1964 The MIT Press,Cambridge MAHardin C L 1988 Color orphilosophers ackett,IndianapolisHarris J 1993 Modernism and culture in the USA, 1930-1960 in Wood J, Frascina F, Harris J and Harrison Ceds Modernismn dispute:art sincethefortiesYale Univer-sity Press, New Haven CT 2-76Hart H 1965 Red Desert Films in Review16 180-1

Heath S 1981 Questionsof cinemaMacmillan, LondonHoberman J 1984 After avant-garde film in Wallis B edArtaftermodernism:ethinking epresentationew Museumof ContemporaryArt, New York59-73

235


20/21

236Hume D 1965 [1757] Of the standardof taste and otheressaysLenz J W ed Bobbs-Merrill,New YorkJacobowitz F and Lippe R 1997 Michelangelo Antonioni:the late years CineAction 2 70-2Jameson F 1992 Thegeopoliticalaesthetic:cinema and spacein theworldsystemIndianaUniversity Press,BloomingtonINJanaway C 1999 Schopenhauer's pessimism in Janaway Ced The Cambridgeompanion o Schopenhauer ambridge

University Press, Cambridge318-43Kaelin E F 1966 An existentialist aestheticUniversity ofWisconsin Press, Madison NJKafka M and Swyngedouw E 2000 Fetishising themodern city: the phantasmagoriaof urban technologicalnetworks InternationalJournal of Urban and RegionalResearch 4 120-38Kant I 1960 [1764]Observations n thefeelingof thebeautifulandthesublime ransJGoldthwaitUniversity of CaliforniaPress, Berkeley CAKant I 2000 [1790] Critiqueof the powerof judgmentGuyerP ed trans P Guyer and E Matthews Cambridge Uni-versity Press, CambridgeKoch G 1987 Bela Balazs: the physiognomy of things inNew GermanCritique40 167-77Koch G 2000 SiegfriedKracauer:an introductiontrans JGaines PrincetonUniversity Press, PrincetonNJKracauer S 1960 Theoryof film: the redemption f physicalrealityOxford University Press, New YorkKrauss R 1985 The originality of the avant-gardeand othermodernistmythsThe MITPress, Cambridge MAKrauss R 1993 The optical unconsciousThe MIT Press,

Cambridge MALeprohon P 1963 [1961] MichelangeloAntonioni:an intro-duction trans Scott Sullivan Simon and Schuster, NewYorkLyotardJ-F1982Presentingthe unpresentable: he sublimeArtForum 0 36-43LyotardJ-F1984 The sublime and the avant-gardeArtForum22 64-9LyotardJ-F1989 Die Erhabenheit st das Unkonsumierbare

Kunstforum 00 365Lyotard J-F 1991 Complexity and the sublime inAppignanesi L ed Postmodernism: CA documentsFreeAssociation Books, London 19-26Lyotard J-F 1994 [1991] Lessons on the analytic of thesublime trans E Rottenberg Stanford University Press,StanfordCAMacDonald S 2001 Thegarden n the machine: field guideto independentilms aboutplaceUniversity of CaliforniaPress, BerkeleyCAMagee B 1983More arguments for transcendental dealismin Magee B The philosophyof SchopenhauerClarendonPress, Oxford 73-104Manceaux M 1964 In the Red Desert Sight and Sound 3318-19. Article originally published in L'Express,ParisMarcusM 1986 Italian ilm in thelight of neorealism rinceton

University Press, PrincetonNJ

Matthew GandyMarx L 1964 The machine in the garden: technology andthe pastoralideal in America Oxford University Press,OxfordMarx L 1991 The American ideology of space in Wrede Sand Adams W H eds Denatured visions: landscapeandculture in the twentiethcenturyMuseum of Modern Art,New YorkMaunier F 1995 La structure myst6rieuse de l'architectureantonionienne CinemAction 5 161-7Merleau-Ponty M 1962 [1945] The phenomenology of

perceptiontrans C Smith Routledge and Kegan Paul,LondonMeszaros I 1970 Marx's theory of alienation Merlin,LondonMetz C 1974 Filmlanguage rans M Taylor Oxford Univer-

sity Press, OxfordMetz C 1982 Theimaginary ignifier:psychoanalysis nd thecinema ndiana University Press, Bloomington INMicciche L 1975 Il cinema italiano degli anni '60 MarsiloEditore,VeniceMicheli S 1991 Il film struttura, lingua, stile. Analisi sualcunicampioni i cinema taliano:Antonioni,Scola,Visconti,TavianiBulzoni, RomeMitchell W J T ed 1994 Landscapend powerUniversity ofChicago Press, Chicago ILMonk S H 1935 The sublimeUniversity of Michigan Press,Ann ArborMI

Moore K Z 1995 Eclipsing the commonplace: the logicof alienation in Antonioni's cinema Film Quarterly4822-34Mulvey L 1975 Visual pleasure and narrative cinemaScreen16 6-18Natter W 1994 The city as cinematic space: modernismand place in Berlin, Symphony of a city in Aitken S Cand Zonn L E eds Power,place,situation and spectacle:

geographyof film Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham MD203-28Nesbitt K 1995 The sublime in modern architecture:

unmasking (an aesthetic of) abstraction New LiteraryHistory26 95-110

Nye D 1994 American echnologicalublimeThe MITPress,Cambridge MAOilman B 1976 [1971] Alienation:Marx'sconception f manin capitalist ociety2nd edn Cambridge University Press,CambridgeOverbey D 1979 ed and trans Springtime n Italy:a readeron neo-RealismArchon Books, Hamden CTParsons C 1992 The transcendental aesthetic in Guyer Ped TheCambridgeompaniono KantCambridgeUniversityPress, Cambridge 62-100Pasolini P P 1965 The cinema of poetry in Heretical mpiri-cism 1988 [1972] trans L Barnett and B Lawton IndianaUniversity Press, Bloomington INPatterson R 1999 Trauma, modernity, and the sublimeJournalof Architecture 31-8Perry T and Preito R 1986 MichelangeloAntonioni:a guideto referencesnd resourcesG.K.Hall, Boston MA


21/21

Landscapesof deliquescence n MichelangeloAntonioni's Red DesertPillow K 2000 Sublimeunderstanding:estheticreflections nKantandHegelThe MITPress, Cambridge MAPries C 1989 Das Erhabne: wischen Grenzerfahrung ndGrdJ3enwahncta humaniora, WeinheimRaffman D 1988 Toward a cognitive theory of musicalineffability Reviewof Metaphysics 1 685-706Reynolds G H 1996 Michelangelo Antonioni: iconolatryand iconoclasmUnpublished PhD dissertationUniversityof MinnesotaRiese U 1998 Landschaft: Die Spur des Sublimen inSchmidt H-W and Riese U eds Landschaft: ie SpurdesSublimenKerberVerlag, BielefeldRifkin N 1982 Antonioni's visual languageUMI ResearchPress, Ann Arbor MIRohdie S 1990 AntonioniBritish Film Institute, LondonRohdie S 2001 Promised ands:cinema,geography,modernismBritish Film Institute, LondonScemama-Heard C 1998 Antonioni: e ddsertfigureHarmat-tan, ParisSchama S 1995 Landscapeand memoryAlfred A Knopf,New YorkSchaper E 1992 Taste, sublimity, and genius: the aestheticsof nature and art in Guyers P ed TheCambridgeompanionto KantCambridge University Press, Cambridge367-93SchliesserJ 1998 Antonioni'sHeideggerianswerve Literature/Film QuarterlyOctober 278-87Seidel P 1993 Unterwelten: Orte im Verborgenen/sitesofconcealmentTexts by Manfred Stack and Klaus KempErnstWasmuth Verlag, TiibingenShiel M and Fitzmaurice T eds 2001 Cinemaand the cityBlackwell,OxfordShiel M and Fitzmaurice T eds 2003 Screeningthe ci

Documents

Antonioni Red Desert