API Engine Oil Licensing and Certification System Years Committee Docu… · AMAP Sample Profile ... D7109 90 Pass Shear Stability X For API CJ-4 & CI-4 PLUS Oils - Every 10th D7528

API Engine Oil Licensing and

Certification System

API Lubricants Group

June 10, 2015

Engine Oil Program Participation

• 655 licenses in 58 countries (as of 6/5/2015)

– 313 North America

– 118 Asia Pacific

– 55 Southeast Asia

– 41 Middle East

– 37 Europe

– 18 South America

– 5 Africa

• Represents >13,000 products

Licenses by Selected API

Performance Levels

PCMO

Count (May ‘14)

Count (May ‘15)

% Change

SN 4713 5968 +27%

SM 2944 2603 -12%

SL 1722 1663 -3%

HDEO

(highest)

Count Count Count

CJ-4 922 1251 +36%

CI-4 950 1011 +6%

CI-4 PLUS 641 789 +23%

Licenses by ILSAC Performance

Visc. Gr. ‘14 Count (Share) ‘15 Count (Share) Annual change

All 2984 3657 +23%

0W-20 343 (11%) 455 (12%) +33%

0W-30 66 (2%) 92 (3%) +39%

5W-20 690 (23%) 845 (23%) +22%

5W-30 1063 (36%) 1305 (36%) +23%

10W-30 822 (28%) 960 (26%) +17%

AMAP SAMPLES

US Sample Distribution (2014)

= state where sample or

samples were purchased

Alaska & Hawaii not sampled.

AMAP Sample Profile (2013‒2014)

2013 2014

Products collected 916 1001

Bottles / Bulk 723 / 193 745 / 256

PCMO / HDEO 85% / 15% 85% / 15%

US & Canada / All Others 83% / 17% 80% / 20%

Visc. Gr. Profile

0W-20 Reported as other 4%

5W-20 12% 15%

5W-30 27% 26%

10W-30 22% 21%

10W-40 10% 10%

15W-40 14% 14%

All others 15% 9%

AMAP Sample Profile (2013‒2014)

Location Type 2013 2014

Quick Lube 38% 36%

Service Station 7% 5%

Auto Repair Shop 33% 17%

Auto Dealer 18% 21%

Truck Facility 2% 1%

Distrib. / Manuf. * <1% 10%

Other 2% 11%

* Includes MOM samples

International Sampling (2013‒2014)

2013 Canada South Korea

Columbia Thailand

Dominican Republic Turks & Caicos

Germany United Kingdom

Greece Vietnam

India

Kingdom of Bahrain

Luxembourg

Mexico

Peru

Saudi Arabia

Singapore

2014 Canada Japan

Chile Mexico

Columbia Spain

Dominican Republic United States

India Vietnam

AMAP Samples by Service Category

(2013‒2014)

Highest Category

Count 2013 (Share)

Count 2014 (share)

SN 627 (68%) 729 (73%)

SM 52 (6%) 58 (6%)

SL 58 (6%) 33 (3%)

SJ 21 (2%) 11 (1%)

CJ-4 102 (11%) 117 (12%)

CI-4 34 (4%) 33 (3%)

CH-4 4 (<1%) 2 (<1%)

Other 18 (2%) 18 (2%)

Packaged Samples Administrative

Audit 2013 2014*

Lic’d marketer name not displayed No data 19%

Improper mark display

Donut 29% 20%

Starburst 19% 20%

Trace Code Errors

Missing 14% 14%

Illegible 1% 11%

* Data still being compiled

AMAP (2013‒2014)

Results

AMAP Test Profile ASTM Method Property PCMO HD Eligible Viscosities/Categories

D445 Viscosity @ 100°C X X Every oil

D4683 High Shear Viscosity X X Every oil except single W grades

D5293 Cold Crank X X Every oil except single, non-W grades

D4684 Pumping X X Every oil except single, non-W grades

D5800 Volatility X X Every Oil

D892 Foaming X XEvery 3rd sample, Option A" Yes for PCMO; Optional

for CJ-4; No Option A when run for CI-4

D6082 High Temp Foam X Every 3rd Oil

D6557 Ball Rust Test X For API SJ, SL & SM Oils - Every 10th

D6594 High Temp Corrosion XFor CH-4, CI-4, CI-4 PLUS & API CJ-4 Oils - Every

10th

D6278 30 Pass Shear Stability X X For API SL, SM, CI-4, CH-4 Oils - Every 10th

D7109 90 Pass Shear Stability X For API CJ-4 & CI-4 PLUS Oils - Every 10th

D7528 ROBO - MRV XFor API SN & SM SAE 0W20, 0W30, 5W20, 5W30 &

10W30 - Every 10th

D2896 Total Base Number X X For SN/RC, GF-5 & HDEO Oils - Every Oil

D4951 Additive Elements by ICP X X Every oil

AMAP Results (2013‒2014)

Approach

• Split “S” oils and “C” oils

• Licensed and unlicensed

• Breakout by geographic area

AMAP Samples (2013‒2014) Geographic Split

2013 2014

Total Samples 916 1001

USA and Canada 765 809

Latin Americas 66 87

Rest of World (RoW) 85 105

AMAP Samples (2013‒2014) License Status

* Three (3) audits on administrative hold

2013 2014*

Total Samples 916 1001

Fully Licensed 730 846

Licensed Company- Unlicensed Brands 65 76

Unlicensed Company – Using Marks 21 31

Unlicensed Company – No Marks 100 45

Licensed “S” Oils

AMAP Samples (2013‒2014) Licensed “S” Oils – US & Canada

2013 2014

BULK BOTTLED BULK BOTTLED

NUMBER OF LICENSED OILS EVALUATED 152 412 199 404

% FULLY CONFORMING OILS 50 76 58 68

% OILS OK-PAPERWORK ISSUES 12 6 30 22

% OILS WITH QUESTIONABLE ADDITIVE 28 13 14 9

% OILS WITH ADDITIVE DEFICIENCIES 5 0.5 0 1

% PHYSICAL PROPERTY/BENCH TEST ISSUE 9 5 6 4

Some oils have multiple issues


Physical Property & Bench Test

Issues 2013 2014


NUMBER OF SAMPLES 14 21 17 27

KV100 2 3 1

CCS vs. SPEC 6 5 2

FE OIL CCS vs. REPORTED 1 NA NA

MRV-YS 1 10 6

MRV-VISC (NO YS) 9 4

NOACK 4 3 1

HTHS 1 1 1 4

30 PASS SHEAR 1 4 1 3

D 892 FOAM

HIGH TEMP FOAM 1

BALL RUST TEST 2 1

ROBO 4 1 3

CRITICAL ISSUES NUMBER OF SAMPLES

2013 2014 BULK BOTTLED BULK BOTTLED

MRV-YS 1 9 2

NOACK >20% 1

MRV-YS + CCS >3X J300 + HTHS >0.4 BELOW J300 + NOACK >20% + PHOSPHORUS <75% 1509

1

30 PASS SHEAR >1.0 BELOW F-2 1

MRV YS + ROBO MRV YS 1

MRV YS + MRV Pumping 3


AMAP Samples (2013–2014) Licensed “S” Oils – Mexico, Latin America,

Caribbean

2013 2014






% OILS WITH ADDITIVE DEFICIENCIES 25 0 0 6




Issues 2013 2014


NUMBER OF SAMPLES 1 1 1 6

FE OIL CCS vs. REPORTED 1

MRV-YS 1

KV100 1

MRV-VISC + YS 2

NOACK 1

30-PASS SHEAR 3


Caribbean

CRITICAL ISSUES 2013 2014 BULK BOTTLED BULK BOTTLED

MRV-YS 1 2


Caribbean

AMAP Samples (2013–2014) Licensed “S” Oils – Rest of World

2013 2014


NUMBER OF LICENSED OILS EVALUATED 24 63

% FULLY CONFORMING OILS 58 71

% OILS OK-PAPERWORK ISSUES 29 24

% OILS WITH QUESTIONABLE ADDITIVE 4 6

% OILS WITH ADDITIVE DEFICIENCIES 0 0

% PHYSICAL PROPERTY/BENCH TEST ISSUE 8 5




Issues

2013 2014


NUMBER OF SAMPLES 2 3

CCS vs. SPEC 1

ROBO 1

BRT 1

PHOS + CCS 1

PHOS + MRV-YS + MRV-Pumping 1

CRITICAL ISSUES 2013 2014


MRV-YS 1 1


AMAP Samples (2014) Regional Comparison – Licensed “S” Oils

PP/BT = Physical property /Bench test

USA/Can Latin America ROW

% Bulk-OK 86% 50% NA

% Packaged-OK 88% 76% 94%

% Bulk-PP/BT Issue 6% 17% NA

% Pack-PP/BT Issue 4% 12% 5%

# Bulk-Critical 0 0 NA

# Pack-Critical 6 2 1

Unlicensed “S” Oils

Unlicensed “S” Oils – US & Canada

SUMMARY NUMBER OF OILS


LICENSED COMPANY, BRAND NOT LICENSED

26 7

OK FOR CATEGORY 22 1

? FOR CATEGORY 0 1 6

NOT OK FOR CATEGORY 4 1

UNLICENSED COMPANY USING MARKS 11 19


? FOR CATEGORY 0 1


UNLICENSED COMPANY-NO MARKS 12 36 7 12

OK FOR CATEGORY 8 30 3 6

? FOR CATEGORY 2 1

NOT OK FOR CATEGORY 4 4 4 5

Unlicensed “S” Oils – Mexico, Latin

America & Caribbean




1 1 2

OK FOR CATEGORY 0 2

? FOR CATEGORY 1 2

NOT OK FOR CATEGORY 1


OK FOR CATEGORY 2 1 ? FOR CATEGORY

NOT OK FOR CATEGORY

UNLICENSED COMPANY-NO MARKS 5 1

OK FOR CATEGORY 3

? FOR CATEGORY


Unlicensed “S” Oils – Rest of World




12

OK FOR CATEGORY 9

? FOR CATEGORY 1


UNLICENSED COMPANY USING MARKS

OK FOR CATEGORY

? FOR CATEGORY

NOT OK FOR CATEGORY



? FOR CATEGORY 3 5


AMAP Samples (2013–2014) Regional Comparison – Unlicensed “S” Oils

Combined 2013 & 2014

US/CAN MEX, LA, CAR Rest of World

BULK


NA ? FOR CATEGORY 1 1


PACKAGED

OK FOR CATEGORY 86 8 25


NOT OK FOR CATEGORY 15 2 10

ROBO Results

AMAP Samples (2013–2014) Licensed “S” Oils – ROBO

* 2013 ROBO testing limited to US/Canada only; 2014 was indiscriminate

2013 2014*^

Samples Tested 40 64

Licensees Tested 32 49

No. Passing (% of total) 36 (90%) 44 (92%)

No. Failing – MRV Yield (%) 3 (8%) 2 (3%)

No. Failing – MRV Viscosity (%) 1 (3%) 5 (8%)

^ Retests still pending on several

Licensed “C” Oils

AMAP Samples (2013–2014) Licensed “C” Oils – US & Canada

2013 2014






% OILS WITH ADDITIVE DEFICIENCIES 0 0 3 0




Issues 2013 2014


MRV-YS, MRV-Pumping, PHOS, CCS 1

HTHS 1 1

HTCBT 1




MRV-YS 1

HTHS 1


AMAP Samples (2013–2014) Licensed “C” Oils – Mexico, Latin America

& Caribbean

2013 2014










& Caribbean


Issues 2013 2014


NOACK 3 1

D 892 FOAM 1



None to report


& Caribbean

AMAP Samples (2013–2014) Licensed “C” Oils – Rest of world


Issues 2013 2014


CCS vs. SPEC 1

MRV-YS + MRV-Visc 2

PHOS 2

D 892 FOAM 1



MRV-YS 2

AMAP Samples (2013–2014) Licensed “C” Oils – Rest of World

AMAP Samples (2013–2014) Licensed “C” Oils – Rest of World

2013 2014









AMAP Samples (2014) Regional Comparison – Licensed “C” Oils

PP/BT = Physical property /Bench test

USA/Can Latin America ROW

% Bulk-OK 87% NA NA

% Packaged-OK 91% 71% 0%

% Bulk-PP/BT Issue 0% NA NA

% Pack-PP/BT Issue 4% 7% 100%

# Bulk-Critical 0 NA NA

# Pack-Critical 2 2 2

UNLICENSED “C” OILS

Unlicensed “C” Oils – US & Canada




0 7 11


? FOR CATEGORY 2



OK FOR CATEGORY 4

? FOR CATEGORY 1



OK FOR CATEGORY 8

? FOR CATEGORY 2


Unlicensed “C” Oils – Mexico, Latin

America & Caribbean




1 3

OK FOR CATEGORY 2

? FOR CATEGORY 1



OK FOR CATEGORY 1 1

? FOR CATEGORY

NOT OK FOR CATEGORY

UNLICENSED COMPANY-NO MARKS 1

OK FOR CATEGORY 1

? FOR CATEGORY

NOT OK FOR CATEGORY

Unlicensed “C” Oils – Rest of World




3 1

OK FOR CATEGORY 3 1 ? FOR CATEGORY

NOT OK FOR CATEGORY

UNLICENSED COMPANY USING MARKS

OK FOR CATEGORY ? FOR CATEGORY

NOT OK FOR CATEGORY

UNLICENSED COMPANY-NO MARKS 1

OK FOR CATEGORY

? FOR CATEGORY


AMAP Samples (2013–2014) Regional Comparison – Unlicensed “C” Oils

Combined 2013 & 2014

US/CAN MEX, LA, CAR Other

BULK

OK FOR CATEGORY 1

NA NA ? FOR CATEGORY

NOT OK FOR CATEGORY

PACKAGED



NOT OK FOR CATEGORY 7 1 1

AMAP 2015

• Total sample goal 1100

• Total bulk goal 250

• Distribution – USA/Canada 80%

– International 20%

• Samples collected under MOM will be added to bulk totals

Why consumers need more information

2014 Bulk Oil Receipts How Much Information

240 Receipts

BRAND NAME

AND/OR

MARKETER +

VISC GRADE +

API CAT

2 OF THE 3 1 OF THE 3NONE OF

THE 3

Total Count (% of total) 43 (18%) 43 (18%) 88 (37%) 66 (28%)

MACHINE PRINTED (208) 29 (14%) 34 (16%) 81 (40%) 64 (31%)

HAND-WRITTEN (32)* 14 (44%) 9 (28%) 7 (22%) 2 (~1%)

* Significant portion may

have been written at

request of collector-may

not be seen by usual

customer

Usually

category

missing

Primarily

viscosity

grade shown

2014 Bulk Oil Receipts Information Type

240 ReceiptsMARKETER

OR BRAND

NAME

VISCOSITY

GRADE

API

CATEGORY

Total Count (% of total) 92 (38%) 160 (67%) 51 (21%)

MACHINE PRINTED (208) 69 (33%) 130 (63%) 37 (18%)

HAND-WRITTEN (32)* 23 (72%) 30 (94%) 14 (44%)

* Significant portion may

have been written at request

of collector-may not be seen

by usual customer

15 HAD NO

"W" IN GRADE

ID

Bulk Oil Receipts

• 22 states have adopted Handbook 130

• California appears to be close

• Others expected to follow

Enacted—distributors and installers must update invoices and receipts to be compliant

Proposed

Listed by National Conference as automatic Handbook 130 adopters

Regulations in Place

Documents

API Engine Oil Licensing and Certification System Years Committee Docu… · AMAP Sample Profile ... D7109 90 Pass Shear Stability X For API CJ-4 & CI-4 PLUS Oils - Every 10th D7528