APPLICATION FOR SECTION 21, ALBEE TOWNSHIP … · Multiple Spans, Steel (as above) SFT $230.00 /SFT Over Water or Single Span (add to replacement cost) 2,380.0 SFT $50.00 /SFT $119,000

SN 9211, Fergus Road over the Fairchild CreekSaginaw County

1

SAGINAW COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION LOCAL BRIDGE FUNDFERGUS ROAD OVER FAIRCHILD CREEK (SN 9211)

SECTION 21, ALBEE TOWNSHIPSAGINAW COUNTY

I. INTRODUCTION

The Fergus Road Bridge over Fairchild Creek is the third priority for SaginawCounty to be replaced in the 2018 fiscal year. Replacement of the entire structureis needed.

The Fergus Road Bridge was originally constructed in 1928. The bridge is a single span structure with a concrete thru girders, a concrete deck slab with an HMA wearing surface. The abutments concrete cantilever style with exposed footings. The bridge has a length of 37.7 feet and a clear width of 21.98 feet.

Fergus Road is a major collector east-west road. The bridge is approximately 1.2 miles east of Bishop Road. The average daily traffic on Fergus Road over the Fairchild Creek is approximately 1861 vehicles per day and it is the only posted bridge on this major collector route between M-52 and M-13.

II. GENERAL CONDITION OF THE FERGUS ROAD BRIDGE

The Fergus Road Bridge is currently posted at 23/36/56 tons and has been for years. The deficiencies noted from an October 2013 inspection included the following:

Heavy cracking with efflorescence and stalactites as well as spalls in deck bottom surface.

Cracking with efflorescence and delamination in abutment corners and exposed abutment footings.

Replacement of the entire structure is needed due to the bridge being scour critical, abutments constricting the channel and the bridge being too narrow for current ADT.


2

III. NARRATIVE SUPPORTING THE APPLICATION

A. Contact Person

The contact person for the Saginaw County Road Commission is:

Mr. Joe Wisniewski, P.E.Director of EngineeringSaginaw County Road Commission3020 Sheridan RoadSaginaw, MI 48601Phone: 989-752-6140

B. Economic Importance

The economic importance of the Fergus Road Bridge over the Fairchild Creekincludes the following:

Fergus Road is a part of a major collector road serving residential and agricultural users. Fergus Road is the only continuous primary east-west between M-52 and M-13 in this area. The Shiawassee National Wildlife Refuge is north of this roadway which blocks east-west travel through the county for 10 miles north (M-46 is the next crossing north of Fergus Road). The next major roadway south for Fergus Road with no posted bridges is M-57 which is 6.5 miles south of Fergus Road.Currently commercial and agricultural traffic over the current posted limit needs to take a 13 mile detour to bypass this bridge while using similar capacity roadways.

C. Existing Impact of Closed Structure

If the existing structure needed to be closed, commercial, agricultural and local traffic would need to travel 13 miles to go around this structure on similar capacity roadways. D. Structure Maintenance

The Saginaw County Road Commission has placed an HMA overlay, chip sealed the overlay, and wedged the settled approaches multiple times.


3

IV. COST BREAKDOWN FOR FERGUS ROAD BRIDGE

The following is the estimated cost for the replacement of the Fergus RoadBridge over the Fairchild Creek, SN 9211.

ITEM COST ITEM COSTA. Approach Construction (A) $372,900.00B. Structure Construction (B) $872,100.00

Total (A&B) $1,245,000.00

V. PRIORITY LIST

The following is the priority list for bridges in Saginaw County:

1. Orr Road over Marsh Creek, Replacement.

2. Sheridan Road over Flint River, PM

3. Fergus Road over Fairchild Creek, Replacement.

4. Hemlock Road bridges, Multiple PM

5. Tittabawassee Road Tittabawassee River, PM

2015 REV. 1/20/2015

REGION: FISCAL YEAR: 2018 STRUCTURE ID: 9211ENGINEER: Casey Collings DATE: 4/30/2015LOCATION: Fergus Road over Fairchild DECK AREA: 1,014 SFT BRIDGE ID:PRIMARY WORK ACTIVITY: Full Replacement DECK DIM: 37.7'x26.9' STR. TYPE: Concrete slab

WORK ACTIVITY QUANTITY UNIT TOTALNEW BRIDGE

Multiple Spans, Concrete (add demo & road approach & traffic control) 2,380.0 SFT $210.00 /SFT $499,800Multiple Spans, Steel (as above) SFT $230.00 /SFTOver Water or Single Span (add to replacement cost) 2,380.0 SFT $50.00 /SFT $119,000Precast 3-sided Culvert or 4-sided Box Culvert SFT $400.00 /SFTOther

NEW SUPERSTRUCTUREConcrete (includes remove exist super, new railing; add t.c. & approach) SFT $130.00 /SFTSteel (as above) SFT $170.00 /SFTOver Water (add to new superstructure cost) SFT $35.00 /SFTOther

WIDENINGAdded portion only. ______ ft of width (add road approach transition) SFT $270.00 /SFTOther

NEW DECKIncludes remove exist deck & new railing (add t.c. & approach) SFT $73.00 /SFTOther

DEMOLITIONEntire bridge, grade separation SFT $32.00 /SFTEntire bridge, over water 1,014.0 SFT $42.00 /SFT $42,588Other

SUPERSTRUCTURE REPAIRConcrete Deck Patch (includes hand chipping) SFT $36.00 /SFTFull Depth Patch SFT $80.00 /SFTHMA Cap (no membrane, add bridge rail if req'd) SFT $1.40 /SFTHMA Overlay with WP membrane (add bridge rail if req'd) SFT $5.50 /SFTRemoval of Concrete Wearing Course (latex) or HMA Overlay SFT $1.50 /SFTEpoxy Overlay SYD $34.00 /SYDShallow Overlay (includes joint repl & hydro; add bridge rail if req'd) SFT $30.00 /SFTDeep Overlay (includes joint repl & hydro; add bridge rail if req'd) SFT $32.00 /SFTHigh Load Hit Repair (PCI Beam) SFT $220.00 /SFTPCI Beam End Repair ($2000-$4000 per beam end) EA $4,000.00 EARepair Structural Steel ($2000 bolted, $6000 welded) EA $6,000.00 EAPaint Structural Steel (includes clean & coat) SFT $20.00 /SFTPartial Painting (includes clean & coat) SFT $40.00 /SFTPin & Hanger replacement (includes temporary supports) EA $7,300.00 EAOther

SUBSTRUCTURE REPAIRPier repair (measured x 2) Replace unit if spalled area > 30% CFT $290.00 /CFTPier repair over water (measured x 2) CFT $330.00 /CFTPier replacement CFT $85.00 /CFTAbutment repair (measured x 2) CFT $290.00 /CFTTemporary Supports for Substructure Repair EA $1,500.00 EASlope Protection repairs SYD $82.00 /SYDOther

MISCELLANEOUSExpansion or Construction Joints (includes removal) FT $540.00 /FTBridge Railing, remove and replace ($205 Type 4, $270 Aesthetic Parapet) FT $260.00 /FTThrie Beam Railing retrofit FT $30.00 /FTDeck Drain Extensions EA $600.00 EAArticulating Concrete Block System (ACB) SYD $150.00 /SYDScour Countermeasures LSUM LSUMOther

ROAD WORKApproach Pavement, 12" RC (add C & G, GR, Slope, Shldr.) 40' ea. end 2,080.0 SFT $15.00 /SFT $31,200Approach Curb & Gutter (18' ea. quad.) 72.0 FT $46.00 /FT $3,312Guardrail Anchorage to Bridge (<40') 4.0 quads $1,500.00 /quad $6,000Guardrail, Type B or T (beyond GR anchorage to bridge, <200') FT $22.00 /FTGuardrail Ending (end section) 4.0 EA $1,800.00 /EA $7,200Roadway Approach work (beyond approach pavement) 1.0 LSUM $225,000.00 LSUM $225,000Utilities LSUM LSUMOther

TRAFFIC CONTROL Unit Cost to be determined by Region or TSC T&SPart Width Construction LSUM LSUMCrossovers EA $275,000.00 EATemporary Traffic Signals set $22,000.00 /setRR Flagging LSUM LSUMDetour 1.0 LSUM $10,000.00 LSUM $10,000Other

CONTINGENCY (10% - 20%) (use higher contingency for small projects) 10 % $94,000MOBILIZATION (estimate at 10% as of 12/9/2014) 10 % $104,000INFLATION (assume 3% per year, beginning in 2016) 9 % $103,000

(DOES NOT INCLUDE PE & CE) CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $1,245,000$1,142,000.00

UNIT COST

Bay

LAP - BRIDGE COST ESTIMATE WORKSHEET- REPLACE -

$944,000.00$1,038,000.00

Saginaw County Road Commission 2014-15 Bridge Inspections GLEG Project No. 1014-2-271

Fergus Rd over Fairchild Creek SCRC # 9211

4/28/2015

1

South elevation of structure

North elevation of structure



4/28/2015

2

View looking south off of

structure

View looking north off of

structure



4/28/2015

3

View looking east thru structure

View of deck surface, typical



4/28/2015

4

View of railing, typical

South end joint



4/28/2015

5

North end joint

Underside of bridge deck,

typical



4/28/2015

6

West abutment

East abutment



4/28/2015

7

Load posting sign

NBI INSPECTION MTCJInspector Name Agency / Company Name Insp. Freq. Insp. Date

Mark Helinski, PE ROWE Professional Services Company 24 10/08/2013

GENERAL NOTESQTL Mark Helinski, P.E.Assisted by Steve Marble

Posted: 23//36/56

Posting Signs in Place

DECK10/09 10/11 10/13

1. Surface(SIA-58A)

5 5 5 Chip sealed HMA. Rutted with rolled edges. Vegetation along edges of thru girders. (10/13)Chip sealed HMA surface. Spalling of northerly 2' of north shoulder. (10/11)HMA surface. Spalling of Norhterly 2' of north shoulder. (10/09)

2. ExpansionJoints

N N N (10/13) (10/11) (10/09)

3. OtherJoints

N N N (10/13)Bridge seat joints have been paved over. (10/11)Bridge seat joints have been paved over. (10/09)

4. Railings 6 6 6 Concrete thru girders act as barriers. Minor concrete deterioration. No approach rail. (10/13)Concrete barrier has superficial deterioration. No approach rail. (10/11)Concrete barier has superficial deterioration. No approach rail. (10/09)

5. Sidewalksor Curbs

N N N (10/13) (10/11) (10/09)

6. DeckBottomSurface(SIA-58B)

5 4 4 Concrete slab between thru girders. Heavy cracking at NWQ. 2 full width diagonal cracks withefflorescence and stalactites. 4 STS, 1 at SWQ drain, 1 at NEQ drain, and 1 at each 1/3 ptclose to S fascia. (10/13)Concrete deck. Heavy cracking at NW quadrant and 2 large spalls. 2 full width diagonalcracks with efflorescence and stalactites. 2 rebar exposed and rusting. (10/11)Concrete deck. Heavy cracking at NW quadrant and 2 large spalls. 2 full width diagonalcracks wit efflorescence and stalactites. 1 rebar exposed and rusting. (10/09)

7. Deck(SIA-58)

5 4 4 Concrete slab between thru girders. Heavy cracking at NWQ. 2 full width diagonal cracks withefflorescence and stalactites. 4 STS, 1 at SWQ drain, 1 at NEQ drain, and 1 at each 1/3 ptclose to S fascia. (10/13)Rating is based on bottom surface only. (10/11)Rating is based on bottom surface only. (10/09)

8. Drainage 2 deck drains per fascia, paved over. (10/13)4 deck drains. (10/11) (10/09)

SUPERSTRUCTURE10/09 10/11 10/13

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

STR 9211 BRIDGE SAFETY INSPECTION REPORTFacility Latitude / Longitude MDOT Structure ID Structure ConditionFERGUS RD 43.256024 / -84.006573 73200016000B010 Poor Condition(4)Feature Length / Width OwnerFAIRCHILD CREEK 37.7 / 26.9 County: Saginaw(73)Location Built / Recon. / Paint / Ovly. TSC Operational Status1.2 MI E OF BISHOP RD 1928 / 1935 / / Bay City(4B) P Posted for load(P)Region / County Material / Design Last NBI Inspection Scour EvaluationBay(4) / Saginaw(73) 1 Concrete / 01 Slab 10/08/2013 / MTCJ U Unknown Scour

Form P2502 Printed on 05/04/2015 Page 1 of 3

9. Stringer(SIA-59)

5 4 4 Concrete thru girder. Minor deterioration at corners of girders. Deck rating affectssuperstructure rating. (10/13)Concrete through girder. Minor deterioration at corners of girders. Deck rating affectssuperstructure rating. (10/11)Concrete through girder. Minor deterioration at corners of girders. Deck rating affectssuperstructure rating. (10/09)

10. Paint(SIA-59A)

N N N (10/13) (10/11) (10/09)

11. SectionLoss

N N N (10/13) (10/11) (10/09)

12. Bearings 6 6 N No bearings, concrete on concrete. (10/13)Bearing device appears to be functioning. No spalls on top of abutments. (10/11)Bearing device appears to be functioning. No spalls on top of abutments. (10/09)

SUBSTRUCTURE10/09 10/11 10/13

13. Abutments(SIA-60)

6 5 5 Concrete cantilever abutments. Small spall at construction joint on west abutment. All 4corners of abutments have cracking with efflorescence and some spalling. Footings areexposed, but not undermined. (10/13)Concrete abutments appear stable. Small spall at construction joint on west abutment. All 4corners of abutments have cracking with efflorescence and some spalling. Footings areexposed. (10/11)Concrete abutments appear stable. Small spall at construction joint on west abutment. All 4corners of abutments have cracking with efflorescence and some spalling. (10/09)

14. Piers(SIA-60)

N N N (10/13) (10/11) (10/09)

15. SlopeProtection

N N N None present. (10/13)Steel sheeting visible near top of exposed footings. Not enough area visible to rate. (10/11)Steel sheeting visible near top of exposed footings. Not enough area visible to rate. (10/09)

APPROACH10/09 10/11 10/13

16. ApproachPavement

6 5 4 HMA. Sealed transverse cracks. Up to 1.5" settlement. (10/13)HMA pavement. Minor (+3/4") settlement at approaches. (10/11)HMA pavement. Minor settlement at east approach. (10/09)

17. ApproachShouldersSidewalks

N 5 N None. (10/13)Poorly graded gravel shoulders. (10/11) (10/09)

18. ApproachSlopes

Well vegetated. (10/13)Vegetated and mostly stable. (10/11) (10/09)

19. Utilities 2" dia galv conduit spans from slopewall to slopewall along N fascia. (10/13)2" conduit on north side of bridge. No longer attached. (10/11)2" conduit on north side of bridge. Barely supported. (10/09)

20. Channel(SIA-61)

7 7 6 Steep, stable banks. Fairly straight alignment. Water flows against exposed footings. (10/13)No undermining of footings. Probed. (10/11)No undermining of footings. Probed. (10/09)




21. DrainageCulverts

2 culverts in NEQ, 1 in NWQ with flapper valve, and 1 in SEQ with flapper valve. (10/13)2 culverts on NE quad and 1 on NW w/ flapper valve. (10/11)2 culverts on NE quad and 1 on NW w/ flapper valve. (10/09)

MISCELLANEOUSGuard Rail Other ItemsItem Rating Item Rating

36A. Bridge Railings 0 71. Water Adequacy 636B. Transitions 0 72. Approach Alignment 636C. Approach Guardrail 0 Temporary Support36D. Approach Guardrail Ends 0 High Load Hit (M) No

Special Insp. EquipmentUnderwater Insp. Method

False Decking (Timber) Removed to Complete Inspection N/A - null

Critical Feature Inspections (SIA-92)Freq Date

92A. Fracture Critical92B. Underwater92C. Other Special92D. Fatigue Sensitive




Bridge History, Type, Materials27 - Year Built 1928106 - Year Reconstructed 1935202 - Year Painted203 - Year Overlay43 - Main Span Bridge Type 1 0144 - Appr Span Bridge Type77 - Steel Type 078 - Paint Type 079 - Rail Type 580 - Post Type 0107 - Deck Type 1108A - Wearing Surface 6108B - Membrane 0108C - Deck Protection 0

Structure Dimensions34 - Skew 2035 - Struct Flared 045 - Num Main Spans 146 - Num Apprs Spans 048 - Max Span Length 34.849 - Structure Length 37.750A - Width Left Curb/SW 050B - Width Right Curb/SW 033 - Median 051 - Width Curb to Curb 21.9852 - Width Out to Out 26.9112 - NBIS Length Y

Inspection Data90 - Inspection Date 10/08/201391 - Inspection Freq 2492A - Frac Crit Req/Freq N93A - Frac Crit Insp Date92B - Und Water Req/Freq N93B - Und Water Insp Date92C - Oth Spec Insp Req/Freq N93C - Oth Spec Insp Date92D - Fatigue Req/Freq N93D - Fatigue Insp Date176A - Und Water Insp Method58 - Deck Rating 458A/B - Deck Surface/Bottom 5 459 - Superstructure Rating 459A - Paint Rating N60 - Substructure Rating 561 - Channel Rating 662 - Culvert Rating N

Navigation Data38 - Navigation Control 039 - Vertical Clearance 040 - Horizontal Clearance 0111 - Pier Protection116 - Lift Brdg Vert Clear

Route Carried By Structure(ON Record)5A - Record Type 15B - Route Signing 45C - Level of Service 15D - Route Number 073265E - Direction Suffix 010L - Best 3m Unclr-Lt 0 010R - Best 3m Unclr-Rt 99 99 PR Number Control Section11 - Mile Point 012 - Base Highway Network 013 - LRS Route-Subroute 0000004744 0619 - Detour Length 1320 - Toll Facility 326 - Functional Class 0728A - Lanes On 229 - ADT 186130 - Year of ADT 200332 - Appr Roadway Width 23.9532A/B - Ap Pvt Type/Width 4 24.0242A - Service Type On 147L - Left Horizontal Clear 0.047R - Right Horizontal Clear 22.053 - Min Vert Clr Ov Deck 99 99100 - STRAHNET 0102 - Traffic Direct 2109 - Truck % 7110 - Truck Network 0114 - Future ADT 2653115 - Year Future ADT 2011 Freeway 0

Structure Appraisal36A - Bridge Railing 036B - Rail Transition 036C - Approach Rail 036D - Rail Termination 067 - Structure Evaluation 368 - Deck Geometry 369 - Underclearance N71 - Waterway Adequacy 672 - Approach Alignment 6103 - Temporary Structure113 - Scour Criticality U

Miscellaneous37 - Historical Significance 498A - Border Bridge State98B - Border Bridge %101 - Parallel Structure N EPA ID Stay in Place Forms143 - Pin & Hanger Code148 - No. of Pin & Hangers

Route Under Structure (UNDER Record)5A - Record Type5B - Route Signing5C - Level of Service5D - Route Number5E - Direction Suffix10L - Best 3m Unclr-Lt10R - Best 3m Unclr-Rt PR Number Control Section11 - Mile Point12 - Base Highway Network13 - LRS Route-Subroute19 - Detour Length20 - Toll Facility26 - Functional Class28B - Lanes Under29 - ADT30 - Year of ADT42B - Service Type Under 547L - Left Horizontal Clear47R - Right Horizontal Clear54A - Left Feature54B - Left Underclearance 99 9954C - Right Feature54D - Right Clearance 99 99 Under Clearance Year55A - Reference Feature N55B - Right Horiz Clearance 327.856 - Left Horiz Clearance 0100 - STRAHNET102 - Traffic Direct109 - Truck %110 - Truck Network114 - Future ADT115 - Year Future ADT Freeway

Proposed Improvements75 - Type of Work 35 176 - Length of Improvement 100.194 - Bridge Cost 22595 - Roadway Cost 2596 - Total Cost 25097 - Year of Cost Estimate 2003

Load Rating and Posting31 - Design Load 441 - Open, Posted, Closed P63 - Fed Oper Rtg Method 064F - Fed Oper Rtg Load 1864MA - Mich Oper Rtg Method 064MB - Mich Oper Rtg .4764MC - Mich Oper Truck 1865 - Inv Rtg Method 066 - Inventory Load 10.770 - Posting 0141 - Posted Loading 233656193 - Overload Class


STR 9211 STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISALFacility Latitude / Longitude MDOT Structure ID Structure ConditionFERGUS RD 43.256024 / -84.006573 73200016000B010 Poor Condition(4)Feature Length / Width OwnerFAIRCHILD CREEK 37.7 / 26.9 County: Saginaw(73)Location Built / Recon. / Paint / Ovly. TSC Operational Status1.2 MI E OF BISHOP RD 1928 / 1935 / / Bay City(4B) P Posted for load(P)Region / County Material / Design Last NBI Inspection Scour EvaluationBay(4) / Saginaw(73) 1 Concrete / 01 Slab 10/08/2013 / MTCJ U Unknown Scour

Form 1717A (01/2002) Printed on 05/04/2015 Page 1 of 1

WORK RECOMMENDATIONS MTCJInspector Name Agency / Company Name Insp. Freq. Insp. Date

Mark Helinski, PE ROWE Professional Services Company 24 10/08/2013

CREW RECOMMENDATIONS CONTRACT RECOMMENDATIONSRecommendation

TypePriority Description Recommendation

TypePriority Description

Bridge Replacement M Prepare for structurereplacement.


STR 9211 WORK RECOMMENDATIONSFacility Latitude / Longitude MDOT Structure ID Structure ConditionFERGUS RD 43.256024 / -84.006573 73200016000B010 Poor Condition(4)Feature Length / Width OwnerFAIRCHILD CREEK 37.7 / 26.9 County: Saginaw(73)Location Built / Recon. / Paint / Ovly. TSC Operational Status1.2 MI E OF BISHOP RD 1928 / 1935 / / Bay City(4B) P Posted for load(P)Region / County Material / Design Last NBI Inspection Scour EvaluationBay(4) / Saginaw(73) 1 Concrete / 01 Slab 10/08/2013 / MTCJ U Unknown Scour

Printed on 05/04/2015 Page 1 of 1

RESOLUTION

Director of Engineering Wisniewski discussed the list of bridges to be submitted for the Local Bridge Program (FY 2018) and recommended acceptance of the following resolution:

Commissioner _____________ moved to accept the following bridge submittal list forconsideration under the Local Bridge Program (FY 2018). These applications have been reviewed and we at the Saginaw County Road Commission are actively seeking participation in the replacement of the following structures:

1. Orr Road over Marsh Creek (Replacement)2. Preventative Maintenance Application

a. Sheridan Road over Flint River3. Fergus Road over Fairchild Creek (Replacement)4. Preventative Maintenance Application

a. Hemlock Road over Weeks Drainb. Hemlock Road over Whitmore Drainc. Hemlock Road over Beaver Creek

5. Preventative Maintenance Applicationa. Tittabawassee Road over Tittabawassee River

Seconded by Commissioner __________. Ayes 5 Nays 0

I, Jennifer Brieske, duly appointed Secretary to the Board of County Road Commissioners, do hereby certify that the above is a true and exact copy of a resolution adopted by the Board and extracted from the minutes of a regular meeting held on Tuesday, April 28, 2015, at the Road Commission Office at 3020 Sheridan Avenue, Saginaw, Michigan.

________________________________Jennifer Brieske, Board Secretary

Documents

APPLICATION FOR SECTION 21, ALBEE TOWNSHIP … · Multiple Spans, Steel (as above) SFT $230.00 /SFT Over Water or Single Span (add to replacement cost) 2,380.0 SFT $50.00 /SFT $119,000