Art. 12 and L.P.G

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/4/2019 Art. 12 and L.P.G.

    1/20

    SADHVI C. KANTH

    2ND LL.M.,

    SLCU.

    ARTICLE 12 OF CONSTITUTIONV.

    LIBERALISATION PRIVATIZATION &

    GLOBALISATION

  • 8/4/2019 Art. 12 and L.P.G.

    2/20

    Art. 12 of Indian Constitution

  • 8/4/2019 Art. 12 and L.P.G.

    3/20

    Article 12

    State as provided under Article 12 of the Constitution has

    four components:

    ( a ) The Government and Parliament of India-Government means any department or institution of

    department. Parliament shall consist of the President, the

    House of People and Council of States.

    ( b ) The Government and Legislature of each State, State

    Legislatures of each State consist of the Governor,

    Legislative Council and Legislative Assembly or any of

    them.

  • 8/4/2019 Art. 12 and L.P.G.

    4/20

    (c) Local Authorities within the territory of India

    Authority means( i ) Power to make rules, bye- laws, regulations,

    notifications and statutory orders.

    ( ii ) Power to enforce them.Local Authority means Municipal Boards, Panchayatsand others legally entitled to or entrusted by thegovernment, municipal or local fund.

    ( d ) Other Authorities , other than local authoritiesworking

    ( i ) Within the territory of India or;

    ( ii ) Outside the territory of India.

  • 8/4/2019 Art. 12 and L.P.G.

    5/20

    Other Authorities

    The most noteworthy expression under Article 12 is otherauthorities

    Not defined in the Constitution.

    The wider this term is interpreted, the wider the ambit of

    fundamental rights would become.

  • 8/4/2019 Art. 12 and L.P.G.

    6/20

    OTHER AUTHORITIES

    In University of Madras v. Santa Bai (AIR 1954 Mad67)

    the Madras High Court evolved the principle ofejusdem generis which meant only authorities that

    perform governmental or sovereign functions can be

    included under Article 12.

  • 8/4/2019 Art. 12 and L.P.G.

    7/20

    Electricity Board, Rajasthan v. Mohan Lal (AIR 1967 SC 1857)

    the Supreme Court held that other authorities would

    include all authorities created by the Constitution or statute on

    which powers are conferred by law.

    It was not necessary that the statutory authority should be

    engaged in performing government or sovereign functions.

  • 8/4/2019 Art. 12 and L.P.G.

    8/20

    In Sukdev Singh v. Bhagat Ram Sardar Singh Raghuvanshi, (1975(1) SCC 421)

    - the court had to deal with the question, whether

    statutory corporations such as the ONGC, IFC and LIC, came

    within the definition oftheState under Article 12.

    The court held that the three corporations were theState

    as the three corporations were created by statutes, had the

    statutory power to make binding rules and regulations, and

    were subject to pervasive government control.

  • 8/4/2019 Art. 12 and L.P.G.

    9/20

    In Ajay Hasia v. Khalit Mujib Sehravarai,

    (AIR 1981 SC 487)

    Here a society registered under the societies registration act runningthe regional engineering college, sponsored, supervised and

    financially supported by the government was held to be an

    authority for the purposes of Article 12.

    The court laid down the following tests to adjudge whether a

    body is an instrumentality of the government or not:

    1. If the entire share capital of the corporation is held by the

    government,

    2. Where the financial assistance of the state is so much as to

    meet almost entire expenditure of the corporation.

  • 8/4/2019 Art. 12 and L.P.G.

    10/20

    3.Whether the corporation enjoys monopoly status, which is state

    conferred or state protected.

    4.Existence of deep and pervasive state control.

    5.If the functions of the corporation are of public importance.

    6.If a department of government is transferred to corporation.

    If on a consideration of these factors it is found that the corporation isan instrumentality or agency of government, it would be an authorityand therefore, state within the meaning of article 12.

  • 8/4/2019 Art. 12 and L.P.G.

    11/20

    L.P.G.

  • 8/4/2019 Art. 12 and L.P.G.

    12/20

    L.P.G., implication in to Indian economy.

    Extensive interference of private sector.

  • 8/4/2019 Art. 12 and L.P.G.

    13/20

    Can Fundamental Rights be claimedagainst them?

  • 8/4/2019 Art. 12 and L.P.G.

    14/20

    When does an act of a private party begins to

    resemble the act of a public authority?

    This may happen because of,

    (i) governmental nexus and assistance to the private

    act or

    (ii) concentration of economic power

    (iii) the simple fact that the private party has

    control over something which is indispensable for

    the ordinary living of other individuals.

  • 8/4/2019 Art. 12 and L.P.G.

    15/20

    The governmental assistance may take the form of,

    (i) tax concession;(ii) grant of monopoly;

    (iii) financial assistance;

    (iv) the power of eminent domain; or(v) any other way in which meaningful assistance may

    be given.

    Joint ventures or joint ownership of an undertaking will

    definitely come in the category of governmentalcollaboration.

  • 8/4/2019 Art. 12 and L.P.G.

    16/20

    Article 12 in the context of LPG

    JUDICIAL APPROACH

    BALCO Employees Union V Union of India, (AIR SC 350) In this case the employees challenged the decision of the Central

    Government to disinvestment majority shares of Bharat AluminiumCo.Ltd., (BALCO) the public under taking to private party.

    The workers contended that they had been adversely affected by thedecision of Government of India to disinvest 51% shares in BALCO in

    favour of private party and Also contended that by reason of disinvestment the workers have lost

    their right and protection under Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution ofIndia.

    The SC strongly defended and justified the Governmental policy ofdisinvestment by saying that the policies of the government ought not

    to remain static and held that the process of disinvestment is Policydecision involving complex economic factors and the courts haveconsistently refrained from interfering with economic decision.

  • 8/4/2019 Art. 12 and L.P.G.

    17/20

    MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS, INDUSTRIALGAINTS - STATE.

  • 8/4/2019 Art. 12 and L.P.G.

    18/20

    The Recommendation of the National

    Commission to Review the working of

    the Constitution, 2002

    New Article 12A should be inserted relating to private

    bodies or persons to making them subject tofundamental rights.

  • 8/4/2019 Art. 12 and L.P.G.

    19/20

    Conclusion The need of the times is that fundamental rights be made

    available against private entities also.

    Otherwise persons aggrieved by actions of large private

    corporations, will have no place to turn to.

    Defeating the very purpose of fundamental rights asenvisaged by the framers of the constitution.

  • 8/4/2019 Art. 12 and L.P.G.

    20/20

    References Arvind P. Datar. Commentary on the Constitution of India,

    2nd. Vol.1, 2007.

    Seervai, H.M. Constitution Law of India, Vol.1

    Singh, Arvind. Globalisation: Myths and Realities. Vol.11

    (Jul-Dec.2010), p.6-10.

    Need For Expanding The Definition Of The State Under

    Article12 Of The Constitution Of India In The Era Of LPG

    [http://www.allindiareporter.in/articles/index.php?article=1082]