Upload
dulcie-melton
View
233
Download
11
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Assessing The Microbiological and Heavy Metal Burden in Some Fresh Water and Marine Fishes in a Segment of the Bight of Bonny, Niger Delta Area of Nigeria.
Favour A. Eyo and Alfred Y. Itah*
Department of Microbiology
University of Uyo, Uyo,
Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria
2
Fig. 1: Map of Nigeria showing study area (Bight of Bonny)
BACKGROUND OF THE STUDYThe Bight of Bonny, on the Southern Atlantic coast of Nigeria (4°15’- 4° 35’ N; 7°30’- 8°25’ E) (Fig. 1). This coastal aquatic system is about 100 km long and more than 30 km wide. Its constitutes the eastern flank of the Niger Delta (Ntekim et al., 1992 and Benson et al; 2007 ), spanning the shorelines of Akwa Ibom, Cross River and Rivers States of Nigeria. The entire ecosystem is made up of extensive network of rivers, estuaries, creeks and tributaries which together form a significant commercial hydrographic feature within the region. The estuaries with the major creeks constitute a rich assemblage of fluvial ecohydrological biotopes, dominated predominantly by intertidal mangrove and Nipa forested wetlands. The study area is exposed to significant anthropogenic inputs such as oil spills, untreated sewage and industrial waste waters. Several other smaller fluvial and domestic effluents are also disposed in the shallow marginal estuarine beaches and creeks.
3
Background of the Study Area Cont’d
Callinectes pallidus
Fin fishes
The contamination of aquatic ecosytems with a wide range of pollutants has become a matter of concern in
the Niger Delta Area of Nigeria over the last few decades, as a result of rapid human population growth and
industrial output.
Petrogenic and anthropogenic activities, urbanization, industrialization and agricultural practices have
increased the amount of heavy metals in the environment especially in aquatic ecosystem.
Fishes are conditioned by their environment and hence it is obvious that if the growing and harvesting
environment of fish is polluted chemically or microbiologically, the fishes are also polluted. Hence the use of
fish to evaluate the health of aquatic ecosystems because pollutants build up in the food chain and are
responsible for adverse effects and death in the aquatic systems.
It has been established that the microbiological and heavy metal load of fish is a reflection of the
contamination level of their habitat and thus a potential indicator of pollution
This work will therefore establish the contamination level of the aquatic ecosystems in question by
determining the contamination levels of fishes inhabiting them.
4
Background of the Study Area Cont’d
Gas flaring
Mangrove oyster (Crassostrea tulipa)
Callinectes pallidus
Fin fishes
Artisanal fishing
Ecosystem pollution
Aquatic resources harvested for human consumption
Figure 2: Evidence of Pollution
5
Objectives Quantitative and qualitative microbiological assessment of
sediment, water and fish samples from marine and freshwater ecosystems
Assess the heavy metal concentration and total petroleum hydrocarbon degrading microorganisms in the different samples
Determine the physicochemical characteristics of sediment and water samples
6
Materials and Methods
Sample (water, sediment and fish) collection and processing
Physicochemical analysis Culture-dependent microbiological analysis
• Total heterotrophic micro-organisms
• Total coliform bacteria• Heavy metal content
• Total hydrocarbon content
• Petroleum hydrocarbon degrading microorganisms
Temperature, pH, total alkalinity, total hardness, turbidity, electrical conductivity, Total and suspended solids, Dissolved O₂, COD, BOD₅, TOC, NH₄, NO₂, NO, N₂, PO₄, SO₄, Sodium, Potassium,
Statistical analysis performed using Statistica® software with levels of significance maintained at 95% for each test
7
Fish Samples and their Local NamesFresh water fin fishes Common name Total weight
Parachanna africana Snake head 105.21g
Malapterus electricus Electric fish 32.78g
Heterobranchus bidorsalis Fresh water cat fish 38.00g
Tilapia zilli Tilapia 35.21g
Oreochromis niloticus Tilapia 34.01g
Fresh water shell fish
Callinectes pallidus Blue crab 14.4g
Macrobrachium vollenhoevenii Brackish water prawn 5.68g
Macrobrachium macrobractiion Shrimp 5.01g
Penaeus notialis Shrimp 4.68g
Callinectes amnicota Crab 4.68g
8
Fish Samples and their Local Names Cont’d.
Marine water fin fish Common name Total weight Ethmalosa fimbriata Bonga fish 128.34gPseudotolithus senegalensis Croacker 128.54g
Pseudotolithus elongatus Croaker 143.80gChrysichthys nigrodigitus Catfish 101.18gPseudotolithus typus Croacker 32.54gMarine water shellfishParapenaeopsis altantica Guinea shrimp 5.70gGeryon maritae West African geryon 4.02gParapenaens congirostris Deep water rose 7.05gAnadara senegalensis Senegal ark 6.70gCardium costatum Costate cockle 8.9g
9
Physicochemical Characteristics of fresh and marine water samples
Physicochemical parameters Sample WHO StandardFresh water Marine water
Appearance Slightly cloudy Slightly cloudy with suspended particles
Clear
Colour (H.U) 20.0 73.0 15.0Odour Inoffensive Marshy InoffensiveTemperature (oc) 26.30 27.63 27-28Turbidity (NTU) 2.14 36.18 5.0Total suspended solids (mg/l) 1.50 8.90 <10.0Electrical conductivity (µS/cm) 38.36 2570 1000Dissolved oxygen (mg/l) 2.20 2.70 6.00Total dissolved solids (mg/l) 19.27 126.5 500pH 6.52 6.71 6.5-8.5Biochemical oxygen demand (mg/l) 1.20 1.60 10.00Sodium (mg/l) 1.50 1.80 200Potassium (mg/l) 0.20 0.50 150Sulphate (mg/l) 2.27 62.4 250Nitrate (mg/l) 0.83 5.96 10.0Phosphate (mg/l) 0.08 24.6 3.50Nitrite (mg/l) 0.01 0.01 0.20Salinity as Cl-(mg/l) 9.0 25.0 250
10
Physicochemical Characteristics of Marine and Fresh Water FishPhysicochemical parameters Sample WHO
StandardFresh water Marine water
Appearance Slightly cloudy Slightly cloudy with suspended particles
Clear
Alkalinity (mg/l) 1.50 1.00 200Total hardness (mg/l) 23.0 252.0 100Calcium hardness (mg/l) 10.0 150.0 200Magnesium hardness (mg/l) 3.17 36.60 150Aluminium (mg/l) 0.008 4.306 0.20Lead (mg/l) <0.001 0.689 0.01Cadmium (mg/l) <0.001 0.260 0.003Nickel (mg/l) <0.001 1.364 0.07Zinc (mg/l) 0.080 0.763 0.10Copper (mg/l) 0.128 1.085 1.00Iron (mg/l) 0.120 2.068 0.30
HU = Hazen unitNTU = Nephelometric Turbidity UnitµS/cm = Microsiemen per centimetre
11
Figure 3: Comparative evaluation and distribution of different physiological groups of microorganisms from marine and freshwater
12
Figure 4: Comparative evaluation and distribution of different physiological groups of microorganisms from marine and freshwater sediment
13
Figure 5: Comparative evaluation and distribution of different physiological groups of microorganisms in finfishes from freshwater
14
Figure 6: Comparative evaluation and distribution of different physiological groups of microorganisms in shell fishes from freshwater
15
Figure 7: Comparative evaluation and distribution of different physiological groups of microorganisms in finfishes from marine water
16
Figure 8: Comparative evaluation and distribution of different physiological groups of microorganisms in shell fishes from marine water
17
Heavy metal concentration in fresh water and marine sediment
Sample Aluminium Lead Cadmium Nickel Zinc Copper Iron
Fresh Water 0.050 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.020 0.200 0.240
Marine Water 7.115 3.431 3.429 4.981 1.832 2.10 9.553
18
Figure 9: Level of heavy metals concentration in finfish parts from marine water
19
Figure 10: Level of Heavy metal concentration in finfish parts from freshwater
20
Figure 11: Level of heavy metal concentration in shell fish parts from freshwater
21
Figure 12: Level of heavy metals concentration in shell fish parts from marine water
22
Summary and Conclusion
The study on the whole evidenced the microbial and heavy metal status of shell and fin-fishes found in freshwater and marine ecosystems.
The heavy metal concentration in the fish organs vary directly with the concentration values in the water and sediment samples analyzed in this study, pointing to the fact that the heavy metals have their way into the fish organs from the environment through respiratory and feeding activities.
Some microbiological analysis, such as, Total heterotrophic counts; Total coliforms; Petroleum hydrocarbon degraders and Total fungal counts, were performed on different fish organs, water and sediment samples.
The presence of Petroleum hydrocarbon degraders e.g. Chromobacterium violaceum, B. subtilis, Penicillium italicum, C. albicans and Micrococcus varians in the fishes present some ecological advantages in the event of oil spill as the degraders in fish could multiply and biodegrade the pollutant for their survival.
It also confirms the fact that both shell and fin fishes remain a promising option in bio-monitoring and pollution assessment in lenthic aquatic systems.
23
Thank you for listening