Upload
luis-cardoso
View
222
Download
6
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Babesia canis canis and Babesia canis vogeli infections in dogs
from northern Portugal
Luıs Cardoso a,b,*, Alvaro Costa c, Joana Tuna c, Lisete Vieira c,Osnat Eyal d, Yael Yisaschar-Mekuzas d, Gad Baneth d
a Department of Veterinary Sciences and CECAV, University of Tras-os-Montes e Alto Douro, P.O. Box 1013, 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugalb Parasite Disease Group, Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular (IBMC), Universidade do Porto, Portugal
c Os Bichos–Veterinary Clinic, 5400-266 Chaves, Portugald School of Veterinary Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, P.O. Box 12, Rehovot 76100, Israel
Received 8 February 2008; received in revised form 7 May 2008; accepted 15 May 2008
Abstract
Canine babesiosis represents an important veterinary medical problem. This study describes the molecular characterization of
babesial parasites detected in eight clinically suspected dogs from northern Portugal, affected by lethargy, muscle tremors, weight
loss, pale mucous membranes, hyperthermia or red-coloured urine. Microscopic examination of peripheral blood smears showed
large intraerythrocytic piroplasms morphologically compatible with Babesia canis in all eight animals. DNA was extracted from
blood on filter paper, and a Babesia spp. infection confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of a 408 bp
fragment of the 18S rRNA gene. Analysis of PCR-derived sequences revealed that seven dogs were infected with B. canis canis and
one with B. canis vogeli. This is the first molecular identification report of both the species B. canis and the subspecies B. canis canis
and B. canis vogeli in dogs from Portugal.
# 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Babesia canis canis; Babesia canis vogeli; Babesiosis; Dog; Portugal; 18S rRNA gene
www.elsevier.com/locate/vetpar
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
Veterinary Parasitology 156 (2008) 199–204
1. Introduction
Canine babesiosis (or piroplasmosis), caused by tick-
borne protozoa, represents an important veterinary
medical problem worldwide (Lobetti, 1998). Two
species have traditionally been identified as the
aetiological agents of the disease in dogs: Babesia
canis and Babesia gibsoni, which correspond to large
(3–5 mm) and small (0.5–2.5 mm) intraerythrocytic
* Corresponding author at: Department of Veterinary Sciences,
University of Tras-os-Montes e Alto Douro, P.O. Box 1013, 5001-
801 Vila Real, Portugal. Tel.: +351 259 350 458;
fax: +351 259 350 629.
E-mail address: [email protected] (L. Cardoso).
0304-4017/$ – see front matter # 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.05.027
parasitic forms (or piroplasms), respectively (Boozer
and Macintire, 2003). The clinical features of canine
babesiosis often include hyperthermia, anaemia, hae-
moglobinuria, lethargy and anorexia (Bourdoiseau,
2006), but clinical signs in dogs may vary depending
on the pathogen (Schetters et al., 1997) and host
immunity (Brandao et al., 2003).
The species B. canis has been subdivided into three
subspecies – B. canis canis, B. canis vogeli and B. canis
rossi – on the basis of differences in vector specificity,
geographical distribution, pathogenicity and antigenic
properties (Uilenberg et al., 1989). Characterization
with molecular methods confirmed the existence of
three distinct genotypes of B. canis, and it has
additionally been suggested that each of the subspecies
L. Cardoso et al. / Veterinary Parasitology 156 (2008) 199–204200
that infect dogs might, in fact, correspond to a
genetically distinct species (Zahler et al., 1998; Carret
et al., 1999). A large Babesia sp. that shares a high
genetic identity with Babesia bigemina from cattle was
recently reported in a dog from North Carolina
(Birkenheuer et al., 2004), and a new subspecies, B.
canis presentii, has been characterized in cats from
Israel (Baneth et al., 2004).
Babesia canis canis, transmitted by Dermacentor
reticulatus ticks, is mostly found in temperate regions of
Europe (Duh et al., 2004; Foldvari et al., 2005) and causes
haemolytic anemia and coagulation abnormalities with
variable degrees of severity (Schetters et al., 1997).
Babesia canis vogeli, transmitted by Rhipicephalus
sanguineus, has mainly been detected in tropical or
subtropical areas of northern, eastern and southern Africa
(Lobetti, 1998; Matjila et al., 2004; Oyamada et al.,
2005), Europe (Caccio et al., 2002; Criado-Fornelio et al.,
2003b), Asia (Baneth et al., 2004; Inokuma et al., 2004),
northern and central Australia (Jefferies et al., 2003), and
North and South America (Birkenheuer et al., 2003;
Passos et al., 2005). It is considered a mildly virulent
subspecies, commonly inducing moderate clinical signs
in dogs. Finally, B. canis rossi, transmitted by
Haemaphysalis leachi, is prevalent in eastern and
southern Africa (Lobetti, 1998; Oyamada et al., 2005)
and causes a severe and often fatal haemolytic syndrome,
notoriously being the most virulent of these three
subspecies (Boozer and Macintire, 2003).
In addition to B. gibsoni, a small Babesia sp. reported
from five continents (Lobetti, 1998; Muhlnickel et al.,
2002; Criado-Fornelio et al., 2003a; Inokuma et al.,
2004; Birkenheuer et al., 2005), other genetically
distinct small piroplasms capable of infecting dogs have
been described. These include Theileria annae, closely
related to Babesia microti and endemic in northwestern
Spain (Zahler et al., 2000a; Camacho et al., 2001) and
Babesia conradae, from southern California (Kjemtrup
et al., 2000; Zahler et al., 2000b).
As variations in pathogenesis and clinical manifes-
tations are known to exist between species and
subspecies of the canine piroplasms, knowledge of
their distribution is important for the therapy against
canine babesiosis and also has potential implications
for vaccine development (Uilenberg et al., 1989;
Schetters, 2005). The diagnosis of infections with
Babesia spp. is usually based on the size and
morphology of the intraerythrocytic piroplasms
observed in peripheral blood smears, but the similarity
between species and subspecies has been a limiting
factor (Kjemtrup et al., 2000; Jefferies et al., 2007).
Serology does not definitively discriminate species and
subspecies, as antibodies to Babesia spp. are often
cross-reactive (Birkenheuer et al., 2003). Molecular
techniques, including polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
and sequence analysis, represent an objective and
precise method of species identification and have been
used for the individual diagnosis and epidemiological
studies of canine Babesia infections (Zahler et al.,
2000a,b; Caccio et al., 2002; Inokuma et al., 2003).
Canine babesiosis caused by large piroplasms is
known to occur in Portugal (Diz-Lopes et al., 2005), but
no data on the genetic characterization of Babesia
species or subspecies has been reported from dogs. In
the present study, we describe the molecular analysis of
parasites from several cases of canine babesiosis
detected in northern Portugal.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Animals and samples
Between October and December 2006, eight domes-
tic dogs living in or close to the city of Chaves
(4184403500N, 782801700W), northern Portugal, were
tested for the presence of babesial parasites. Routine
physical examination had previously revealed clinical
signs compatible with babesiosis, including lethargy,
muscle tremors, weight loss, pale mucous membranes,
hyperthermia, or red-coloured urine. These suspected
animals were of different breeds, both genders, aged
from 12 to 36 months (Table 1), and each of them had
access to outdoors as reported by their owners. No
history of travelling outside Portugal was recorded for
any of the eight dogs. Samples of peripheral blood from
the ear tip were collected from each animal to prepare
thin smears and to assess haematocrit. The slide smears
were air-dried, fixed with methanol, Giemsa-stained
and then examined under light microscopy (magnifica-
tion 1000�) for detection of possible intraerythrocytic
piroplasms. Peripheral blood was also spotted onto
individual filter papers allowed to air-dry and stored at
�20 8C until use.
2.2. DNA extraction
Blood samples spotted onto the filter paper,
corresponding to approximately 20 ml of fluid, were
cut out by use of individual sterile scalpel blades and put
into sterile tubes for DNA extraction (Strauss-Ayali
et al., 2004). DNA was extracted by adding 300 ml
of lysis buffer [50 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris, 10 mM
EDTA (pH 8.0)], proteinase K to a final concentration
of 250 mg/ml and Triton X-100 (20%) to a final
L. Cardoso et al. / Veterinary Parasitology 156 (2008) 199–204 201
Table 1
Physical examination, haematocrit and level of parasitemia in eight dogs from northern Portugal infected with Babesia spp. by Giemsa-stained smear
microscopy and PCR with further characterization of infective subspecies by sequence analysis
Dog Breed Gender Age
(months)
Clinical signs HCT (%) Observed
parasitemia
PCR for
Babesia
Subspecies (% relatedness; closest
GenBank accession number)
1 Mongrel M 36 Lethargy, hyperthermia, RU 33 ++ + B. canis canis (99.0; AY321119)
4 Pointer M 24 Muscle tremors, weight loss, RU 20 +++ + B. canis canis (99.0; AY321119)
5 Mongrel M 17 PMM, hyperthermia, RU 20 + + B. canis canis (100; AY648872)
7 Rottweiler M 20 PMM, RU 20 + + B. canis canis (100; DQ181653)
8 Mongrel F 12 Yellow mucous membranes, RU 15 + + B. canis canis (99.0; DQ181653)
9 Podengo F 12 Lethargy, PMM, hyperthermia 35 + + B. canis vogeli (100; AY371197)
11 ND M 30 Hyperthermia, RU 38 + + B. canis canis (99.0; DQ181653)
12 Podengo ND 24 PMM, hyperthermia, RU 28 ++ + B. canis canis (100; DQ181653)
HCT: haematocrit (normal range: 37–55%); M: male; F: female; ND: not determined; RU: red urine; PMM: pale mucous membranes.
concentration of 1%. Following a 2 h incubation at
56 8C and an inactivation of proteinase K at 90 8C for
10 min, 300 ml of phenol (75%), chloroform (24%) and
isoamylalcohol (1%) mixture were added, vortexed and
centrifuged (12,000 � g) for 4 min. The supernatant
was collected and 300 ml of a mixture of phenol (50%),
chloroform (48%) and isoamylalcohol (2%) were
added, vortexed and centrifuged (12,000 � g) for
4 min. The supernatant was collected and 300 ml of a
mixture of chloroform (96%) and isoamylalcohol (4%)
were added, vortexed and centrifuged (12,000 � g) for
4 min. The supernatant was collected, and 1:10 volume
of Na-acetate (3 M) and 1 volume of ice cold 100%
isopropanol (�20 8C) were added and incubated over
night at �20 8C. Following centrifugation (14,000 � g)
at 4 8C for 30 min, the supernatant was discarded and
the pellet was washed with 150 ml of ethanol (75%,
�20 8C) and centrifuged (13,000 � g, 4 8C) for 15 min.
The supernatant was discarded and the pellet was air-
dried. The DNAwas then hydrated with 30 ml of ddH2O
for 1 h at 50 8C.
2.3. PCR
Primers PIRO-A (50-AAT ACC CAA TCC TGA
CAC AGG G-30) and Piro-B (50-TTA AAT ACG AAT
GCC CCC AAC-30) were used to amplify a 408 bp
fragment of the 18S rRNA gene of Babesia spp. by
PCR (Olmeda et al., 1997). Amplification was done
under the following conditions: 94 8C for 1 min
followed by 39 cycles of 94 8C for 45 s, 62 8C for
45 s, and 72 8C for 45 s.
2.4. Sequence analysis
The PCR DNA products were sequenced using
BigDye1 Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit
(PerkinElmer, Applied Biosystems Divisions, Foster
City, CA) and ABI PRISM 3100 Genetic Analyzer
(Applied Biosystems Divisions, Foster City, CA) at the
Hylabs laboratories (Rehovot, Israel) according to the
recommendations of the manufacturer. Obtained
sequences were evaluated with ChromasPro software
version 1.33 and compared to sequence data available
from GenBank using the BLAST 2.2.9 program (http://
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/).
3. Results
Intraerythrocytic pear-shaped parasitic forms 3–
5 mm long were detected in Giemsa-stained blood
smears from all eight clinically suspected dogs (Fig. 1).
These large piroplasms mainly occurred in pairs inside
red blood cells and were morphologically compatible
with B. canis.
Results concerning physical examination, haemato-
crit, level of parasitemia, PCR for Babesia spp. and
subspecies relatedness of the infected dogs are
presented in Table 1. Red-coloured urine, hyperthermia
and pale mucous membranes were frequent clinical
signs, found in seven, five and four animals, respec-
tively. Seven out of the eight dogs with babesiosis were
anemic with a haematocrit value below the normal
range (37–55%). Dogs number 5, 7, 8 and 9 were
reported by the owners to have had ticks in the past, but
no external parasites could be identified at the time of
consultation.
The eight animals found to be infected by blood
smear microscopy were confirmed as positive by PCR
specific for Babesia spp. Further analysis of the partial
18S rRNA gene sequences determined seven dogs
infected with B. canis canis (99–100% relatedness to
the GenBank closest sequence) and one with B. canis
vogeli (100% relatedness).
L. Cardoso et al. / Veterinary Parasitology 156 (2008) 199–204202
Fig. 1. Peripheral blood smear showing pairs of intraerythrocytic large piroplasms compatible with Babesia canis (filled arrows) and phagocytosis of
infected erythrocytes by a mononuclear cell (open arrows). These piroplasms were further characterized as B. canis canis by DNA sequence analysis.
Giemsa; bar = 5 mm.
4. Discussion
The diagnosis of Babesia spp. infections is often based
on intraerythrocytic piroplasm observation in peripheral
blood smears. However, this method does not allow
differentiation between morphologically similar strains,
subspecies or species (Jefferies et al., 2003). In addition,
with antigenic cross-reactivity between species,
serology-based diagnosis lacks specificity (Yamane
et al., 1993; Birkenheuer et al., 2003). PCR represents
a great advantage over microscopical detection due to its
high sensitivity and specificity (Inokuma et al., 2004).
Furthermore, the phylogenetic analysis of DNA
sequences derived from the amplification of the 18S
rRNA gene provides strain characterization, including
that of subspecies B. canis canis, B. canis vogeli and B.
canis rossi (Zahler et al., 1998; Carret et al., 1999). The
collection of blood on filter paper facilitates convenient
sample storage and transport to the diagnostic laboratory
(Jefferies et al., 2007).
The present study was carried out to characterize, by
means of molecular methods, the aetiological agents of
babesiosis in dogs from northern Portugal. The PCR
primers used were not species-specific (Olmeda et al.,
1997; Foldvari et al., 2005); however, subsequent
sequence analysis of PCR products showed that seven
dogs were infected with B. canis canis and one with B.
canis vogeli.
This is the first report of the molecular identification
of both the species (B. canis) and subspecies (B. canis
canis and B. canis vogeli) of babesial parasites in
naturally infected dogs from Portugal. On the basis of
size and morphology of intraerythrocytic piroplasms, it
has been demonstrated that the agents of canine
babesiosis in northern Portugal comprised large
babesial parasites (Diz-Lopes et al., 2005). Based on
presumed vector specificity and clinical aspects, it was
previously assumed that B. canis could be the species
causing disease in dogs. However, identification and
molecular characterization at the subspecies level were
not available.
The presence of B. canis canis and B. canis vogeli in
northern Portugal is supported by the geographical
distribution of their vector ticks. In fact, D. reticulatus
and R. sanguineus, the vectors of B. canis canis and B.
canis vogeli, respectively, have been found to be
abundant in the Montesinho Natural Park (Santos-Silva
et al., 2006), which is contiguous to the municipality of
Chaves where the dogs were sampled. These facts
strongly suggest the autochthonous nature of B. canis
canis and B. canis vogeli infection among dogs in
northern Portugal, with D. reticulatus and R. sanguineus
as their probable vectors. However, additional studies
are essential to confirm the vector candidates and
evaluate endemicity levels.
Infections with Babesia spp. can range from an
asymptomatic or mild clinical condition to severe
disease depending on the virulence of the infecting
protozoan and the susceptibility of the individual host.
The fact that B. canis canis was more frequently
L. Cardoso et al. / Veterinary Parasitology 156 (2008) 199–204 203
detected may be due to its more virulent nature or to a
higher prevalence of infected tick vectors. Dogs
infected with B. canis canis would potentially be
brought in more often for veterinary consultation,
because of the severity of clinical presentation as
compared with the relatively mild signs of B. canis
vogeli infection.
The different subspecies of B. canis have been
described to cause somewhat diverse clinical manifes-
tations, and this finding may have implications for
treatment and vaccination (Uilenberg et al., 1989;
Matjila et al., 2004; Schetters, 2005).
In the present study, most of the dogs infected either
with B. canis canis or B. canis vogeli showed clinical
abnormalities such as low haematocrit, hyperthermia
and red urine. Although data from a complete
assessment are not available, a clear correlation could
not be drawn between B. canis subspecies and clinical
signs in those animals diagnosed with each of the two
subspecies.
In Europe, canine babesiosis has been found to be
caused mainly by B. canis canis and B. canis vogeli
(Caccio et al., 2002; Criado-Fornelio et al., 2003b; Duh
et al., 2004; Foldvari et al., 2005; Gulanber et al., 2006),
and cases due to small species are more rarely reported.
However, T. annae causes severe illness in dogs and is
endemic in Galicia, northwestern Spain (Camacho
et al., 2001), which borders the area of Portugal where
the present study was carried out. This small piroplasm
has Ixodes hexagonus as its main candidate vector
(Camacho et al., 2003), a tick species which has
also been found in Portugal (Caeiro, 1999). To our
knowledge there are no reports of T. annae infection in
dogs from Portugal, but this might change in the future.
Indeed, the increasing mobility of dogs and the
existence of competent vectors may allow piroplasms
to spread into previously non-endemic areas (Caccio
et al., 2002).
In conclusion, studies on the prevalence of B. canis
canis and B. canis vogeli in larger dog populations in
Portugal, consisting of both symptomatic and asympto-
matic animals, are necessary as well as studies in ticks.
These are important in order to define endemic areas
and to promote effective control measures against
canine babesiosis.
References
Baneth, G., Kenny, M.J., Tasker, S., Anug, Y., Shkap, V., Levy, A.,
Shaw, S.E., 2004. Infection with a proposed new subspecies of
Babesia canis, Babesia canis subsp. presentii, in domestic cats. J.
Clin. Microbiol. 42, 99–105.
Birkenheuer, A.J., Correa, M.T., Levy, M.G., Breitschwerdt, E.B.,
2005. Geographic distribution of babesiosis among dogs in the
United States and association with dog bites: 150 cases (2000–
2003). J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 227, 942–947.
Birkenheuer, A.J., Levy, M.G., Stebbins, M., Poore, M., Breitsch-
werdt, E., 2003. Serosurvey of antiBabesia antibodies in stray
dogs and American pit bull terriers from North Carolina. J. Am.
Anim. Hosp. Assoc. 39, 551–557.
Birkenheuer, A.J., Neel, J., Ruslander, D., Levy, M.G., Breitschwerdt,
E.B., 2004. Detection and molecular characterization of a novel
large Babesia species in a dog. Vet. Parasitol. 124, 151–160.
Boozer, A.L., Macintire, D.K., 2003. Canine babesiosis. Vet. Clin.
Small Anim. 33, 885–904.
Bourdoiseau, G., 2006. Canine babesiosis in France. Vet. Parasitol.
138, 118–125.
Brandao, L.P., Hagiwara, M.K., Myiashiro, S.I., 2003. Humoral
immunity and reinfection resistance in dogs experimentally inocu-
lated with Babesia canis and either treated or untreated with
imidocarb dipropionate. Vet. Parasitol. 114, 253–265.
Caccio, S.M., Antunovic, B., Moretti, A., Mangili, V., Marinculic, A.,
Baric, R.R., Slemenda, S.B., Pieniazek, N.J., 2002. Molecular
characterisation of Babesia canis canis and Babesia canis vogeli
from naturally infected European dogs. Vet. Parasitol. 106, 285–
292.
Caeiro, V., 1999. General review of tick species present in Portugal.
Parassitologia 41 (Suppl. 1), 11–15.
Camacho, A.T., Pallas, E., Gestal, J.J., Guitian, F.J., Olmeda, A.S.,
Goethert, H.K., Telford, S.R., 2001. Infection of dogs in north-
west Spain with a Babesia microti-like agent. Vet. Rec. 149, 552–
555.
Camacho, A.T., Pallas, E., Gestal, J.J., Guitian, F.J., Olmeda, A.S.,
Telford III, S.R., Spielman, A., 2003. Ixodes hexagonus is the main
candidate as vector of Theileria annae in northwest Spain. Vet.
Parasitol. 112, 157–163.
Carret, C., Walas, F., Carcy, B., Grande, N., Precigout, E., Moubri, K.,
Schetters, T.P., Gorenflot, A., 1999. Babesia canis canis, Babesia
canis vogeli, Babesia canis rossi: differentiation of the three
subspecies by a restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis
on amplified small subunit ribosomal RNA genes. J. Eukaryot.
Microbiol. 46, 298–303.
Criado-Fornelio, A., Gonzalez-del-Rıo, M.A., Buling-Sarana, A.,
Barba-Carretero, J.C., 2003a. Molecular characterization of a
Babesia gibsoni isolate from a Spanish dog. Vet. Parasitol. 117,
123–129.
Criado-Fornelio, A., Martinez-Marcos, A., Buling-Sarana, A., Barba-
Carretero, J.C., 2003b. Molecular studies on Babesia, Theileria
and Hepatozoon in southern Europe. Part I. Epizootiological
aspects. Vet. Parasitol. 113, 189–201.
Diz-Lopes, D., Rodrigues, F.T., Alves, S., Santos-Silva, M., 2005.
Babesiose em Cao de Gado Transmontano. Vet. Tec. 11 (Set/Out),
36.
Duh, D., Tozon, N., Petrovec, M., Strasek, K., Avsic-Zupanc, T., 2004.
Canine babesiosis in Slovenia: molecular evidence of Babesia
canis canis and Babesia canis vogeli. Vet. Res. 35, 363–368.
Foldvari, G., Hell, E., Farkas, R., 2005. Babesia canis canis in dogs
from Hungary: detection by PCR and sequencing. Vet. Parasitol.
127, 221–226.
Gulanber, A., Gorenflot, A., Schetters, T.P.M., Carcy, B., 2006. First
molecular diagnosis of Babesia vogeli in domestic dogs from
Turkey. Vet. Parasitol. 139, 224–230.
Inokuma, H., Yoshizaki, Y., Matsumoto, K., Okuda, M., Onishi, T.,
Nakagome, K., Kosugi, R., Hirakawa, M., 2004. Molecular survey
L. Cardoso et al. / Veterinary Parasitology 156 (2008) 199–204204
of Babesia infection in dogs in Okinawa, Japan. Vet. Parasitol.
121, 341–346.
Inokuma, H., Yoshizaki, Y., Shimada, Y., Sakata, Y., Okuda, M.,
Onishi, T., 2003. Epidemiological survey of Babesia species in
Japan performed with specimens from ticks collected from dogs
and detection of new Babesia DNA closely related to Babesia
odocoilei and Babesia divergens DNA. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41,
3494–3498.
Jefferies, R., Ryan, U.M., Irwin, P.J., 2007. PCR-RFLP for the
detection and differentiation of the canine piroplasm species
and its use with filter paper-based technologies. Vet. Parasitol.
144, 20–27.
Jefferies, R., Ryan, U.M., Muhlnickel, C.J., Irwin, P.J., 2003.
Two species of canine Babesia in Australia: detection and
characterization by PCR. J. Parasitol. 89, 409–412.
Kjemtrup, A.M., Kocan, A.A., Whitworth, L., Meinkoth, J., Birken-
heuer, A.J., Cummings, J., Boudreaux, M.K., Stockham, S.L.,
Irizarry-Rovira, A., Conrad, P.A., 2000. There are at least three
genetically distinct small piroplasms from dogs. Int. J. Parasitol.
30, 1501–1505.
Lobetti, R.G., 1998. Canine babesiosis. Compend. Cont. Educ. Pract.
Vet. 20, 418–431.
Matjila, T.P., Penzhorn, B.L., Bekker, C.P.J., Nijhof, A.M., Jongejan,
F., 2004. Confirmation of occurrence of Babesia canis vogeli in
domestic dogs in South Africa. Vet. Parasitol. 122, 119–125.
Muhlnickel, C.J., Jefferies, R., Morgan-Ryan, U.M., Irwin, P.J., 2002.
Babesia gibsoni infection in 3 dogs in Victoria. Aust. Vet. J. 80,
606–610.
Olmeda, A.S., Armstrong, P.M., Rosenthal, B.M., Valladares, B., del
Castillo, A., de Armas, F., Miguelez, M., Gonzalez, A., Rodriguez,
J.A., Spielman, A., Telford, S.R., 1997. A subtropical case of
human babesiosis. Acta Trop. 67, 229–234.
Oyamada, M., Davoust, B., Boni, M., Dereure, J., Bucheton, B.,
Hammad, A., Itamoto, K., Okuda, M., Inokuma, H., 2005. Detec-
tion of Babesia canis rossi, B. canis vogeli, and Hepatozoon canis
in dogs in a village of eastern Sudan by using a screening PCR and
sequencing methodologies. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 12, 1343–
1346.
Passos, L.M.F., Geiger, S.M., Ribeiro, M.F.B., Pfister, K., Zahler-
Rinder, M., 2005. First molecular detection of Babesia vogeli in
dogs from Brazil. Vet. Parasitol. 127, 81–85.
Santos-Silva, M., Sousa, R., Santos, A.S., Lopes, D., Queijo, E.,
Doreta, B., Vitorino, L., Bacellar, F., 2006. Ticks and tick-borne
rickettsiae surveillance in Montesinho Natural Park, Portugal.
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1078, 137–142.
Schetters, T., 2005. Vaccination against canine babesiosis. Trends
Parasitol. 21, 179–184.
Schetters, T.M.P., Moubri, K., Precigout, E., Kleuskens, J., Scholtes,
N.C., Gorenflot, A., 1997. Different Babesia canis isolates, dif-
ferent diseases. Parasitology 115, 485–493.
Strauss-Ayali, D., Jaffe, C.L., Burshtain, O., Gonen, L., Baneth, G.,
2004. Polymerase chain reaction using noninvasively obtained
samples, for the detection of Leishmania infantum DNA in dogs. J.
Infect. Dis. 189, 1729–1733.
Uilenberg, G., Franssen, F.F.J., Perie, M., Spanjer, A.M.M., 1989.
Three groups of Babesia canis distinguished and a proposal for
nomenclature. Vet. Q. 11, 33–40.
Yamane, I., Thomford, J.W., Gardner, I.A., Dubey, J.P., Levy, M.,
Conrad, P.A., 1993. Evaluation of the indirect fluorescent antibody
test for diagnosis of Babesia gibsoni infections in dogs. Am. J. Vet.
Res. 54, 1579–1584.
Zahler, M., Rinder, H., Schein, E., Gothe, R., 2000a. Detection of a
new pathogenic Babesia microti-like species in dogs. Vet. Para-
sitol. 89, 241–248.
Zahler, M., Rinder, H., Zweygarth, E., Fukata, T., Maede, Y., Schein,
H., Gothe, R., 2000b. ‘Babesia gibsoni’ of dogs from North
America and Asia belong to different species. Parasitology 120,
365–369.
Zahler, M., Schein, E., Rinder, H., Gothe, R., 1998. Characteristic
genotypes discriminate between Babesia canis isolates of differ-
ing vector specificity and pathogenicity to dogs. Parasitol. Res. 84,
544–548.