bakhan

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/16/2019 bakhan

    1/6

    International Society

    of Ocular TraumaOcular trauma resources for the worldMenu

    Skip to content

    • Home

    • About

    • BETTS

    • Donate

    • Past Meetings

    • Sonsors

    • Downloads

    BETTS

    Birmingham Eye TraumaTerminology System (BETTS)

    This comprehensive, standardized

    system of eye trauma terms,should be

    http://isotonline.org/http://isotonline.org/http://isotonline.org/betts/#contenthttp://isotonline.org/http://isotonline.org/about/http://isotonline.org/betts/http://isotonline.org/donate/http://isotonline.org/past-meetings/http://isotonline.org/sponsors/http://isotonline.org/documents-for-the-isot-study-for-the-prevention-of-post-traumatic-pvr/http://isotonline.org/http://isotonline.org/betts/#contenthttp://isotonline.org/http://isotonline.org/about/http://isotonline.org/betts/http://isotonline.org/donate/http://isotonline.org/past-meetings/http://isotonline.org/sponsors/http://isotonline.org/documents-for-the-isot-study-for-the-prevention-of-post-traumatic-pvr/http://isotonline.org/http://isotonline.org/

  • 8/16/2019 bakhan

    2/6

    utilized when reporting to USEIR.

    Endorsed by: Mandated by:

    • World Eye Injury Registry  • Graefe’s Archives

    • American Academy ofOphthalmology • Klinische onats!l"tter 

    • International #ociety of Ocular

    $rauma • Ophthalmology 

    • Retina #ociety

    • %nited #tates Eye InjuryRegistry   

    • &itreous #ociety   

    • World Eye Injury Registry   

    • American #ociety of Ocular$rauma  

    http://isotonline.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/bettschart.png

  • 8/16/2019 bakhan

    3/6

    BETTSlossary of Terms

    Term !efinition and e'planation

    Eyewall

    Sclera and cornea.

    $hough technically the eye(all has three coats posterior to the lim!us) for clinical and practical   purposes violation of only the moste'ternal structure is ta*en into consideration

    Closed globeinjury "o full# thic$ness wound of eyewall.

    Open globeinjury %ull# thic$ness wound of the eyewall.

    Contusion

    There is no &full# thic$ness' wound.

    $he injury is either due to direct energy delivery!y the o!ject +e, g,) choroidal rupture- or tothe changes in the shape of the glo!e +e, g,)

    angle recession-

    amellarla!eration (artial# thic$ness wound of the eyewall.

    "upture

    %ull# thic$ness wound of the eyewall, caused by a bluntob)ect.

    #ince the eye is filled (ith incompressi!le li.uid)the impact results in momentary increase ofthe IO/, $he eye(all yields at its (ea*est point+at the impact site or else(here0 e'ample1 an oldcataract  (ound dehisces even though the impact occurred else(here-0 the actual (ound is produced !y an inside2 out mechanism

    a!eration

    %ull# thic$ness wound of the eyewall, caused by a sharpob)ect.

    $he (ound occurs at the impact site !y anoutside2 in mechanism

  • 8/16/2019 bakhan

    4/6

    #enetratinginjury

    Entrance wound.

    If more than one (ound is present) each

    must have !een caused !y a different agent 

    Retained foreign ob)ect* s.

    $echnically a penetrating injury) !utgrouped separately !ecause of differentclinical implications

    #er$oratinginjury

    Entrance and e+it wounds.

    3oth (ounds caused !y the same agent 

    %Some injuries remain di$$i!ult to !lassi$y& 'or instan!e an intraitreal BB pellet iste!hni!ally an *O'B injury& +oweer sin!e this is a blunt obje!t that re,uires a hugeimpa!t $or!e i$ they enter not just !ontuse the eye there is an element o$ ruptureinoled& *n su!h situations the ophthalmologist should either des!ribe the injury as-mi.ed/ (i& e& rupture with an *O'B) or sele!t the most serious type o$ theme!hanisms inoled&

    Discussion  0orldwide interest in o!ular trauma is rapidly growing as in!reasingly e$$e!tiete!hni,ues $or preention and treatment are deeloped& #ro$essional asso!iations (*nternationalSo!iety o$ O!ular Trauma1nited States Eye *njury "egistry) hae been $ormed to promote resear!h anddisseminate its results&1n$ortunately the la!2 o$ an unambiguous !ommon language remains a majorlimiting $a!tor in e$$e!tielysharing eye injury in$ormation: arying responses are gien to simple ,uestions su!has What is the distinction !et(een laceration) rupture) penetration) and perforation4

    Is a full2 thic*ness scleral (ound (ithout o!vious choroidal and retinal involvementan open glo!e injury4 If a foreign !ody has traversed the eye and lodged in the or!it)is it perforating4 dou!le perforating4 dou!le penetrating4 )&  3espite these ambiguities whether publishing in a peer4 reiew journal ordis!ussing patient re$erral oer the telephone ophthalmologists !ontinue to use !ertain o!ular trauma terms ratherthan lengthy des!riptions to !hara!teri5e the eye6s !ondition& Our !olleagues7de$inition and understanding o$ these terms are assumedidenti!al to ours with ea!h term haing a de$inition whi!h is unambiguous andindependent o$ su!h ariables as time indiiduality geographi!al lo!ation and pla!eo$ training& *t is also !ommonly assumed that a one4to4one relationship between

    !ondition and term e.ists: there is no !ondition whi!h !an alternatiely be des!ribedby more than a single term and there is no term !hara!teri5ing more than a single

  • 8/16/2019 bakhan

    5/6

    !lini!al !ondition& 1n$ortunately our reiew o$ s!ienti$i! journals and re$eren!e boo2sproed these assumptions to be in!orre!t&0ithout a standardi5ed terminology o$ eye injury types it is impossible to designproje!ts li2e the 1nited

    States Eye *njury "egistry (1SE*") or the 0orld Eye *njury "egistry (0E*")8 !lini!altrials in the $ield o$ o!ular trauma !annot be planned8 and the !ommuni!ationbetween ophthalmologists remains ambiguous& 9standardi5ed terminology $or eye injury has been deeloped based on e.tensiee.perien!e& *t has thenundergone repeated reiews by international ophthalmi! audien!es in!orporatingsuggestions $romrespondents in ; !ountries and sele!ted o!ular trauma e.perts& By always using theentire globe as the tissue o$ re$eren!e !lassi$i!ation is unambiguous !onsistent andsimple& *t proides de$initions $or the !ommonly used eye trauma terms within the$ramewor2 o$ a !omprehensie system&

    ETTSBETTS satis$ies all !riteria by:) proiding a !lear de$inition $or all injury types (Table )

  • 8/16/2019 bakhan

    6/6

    Sundaram atara-an, um*ai,(ndia

    Daid %ela#es, uenos Aires,Argentina

    /ol&gang Schrader,urem*erg, $erman#&hairman of theBoard% Ro*ert orris,irmingham, AL, USA 

    A'liated societies%American Academ# o&0phthalmolog#

    American Societ# o& 0cular 1rauma

    Asia %aci2c 0phthalmic 1rauma Societ#

    %an3American Societ# o&0cular 1rauma 

    log at /ord%ress.com. 4 1he ist# Lake 1heme.Follow

    Follow “International Society of Ocular Trauma”

    $et eer# new post deliered to #our (n*o!.

    Sign me up

    uild a we*site with /ord%ress.com

    http://www.aao.org/http://www.aao.org/https://wordpress.com/?ref=footer_bloghttps://wordpress.com/themes/misty-lake/http://void%280%29/https://wordpress.com/?ref=lofhttp://www.aao.org/http://www.aao.org/https://wordpress.com/?ref=footer_bloghttps://wordpress.com/themes/misty-lake/http://void%280%29/https://wordpress.com/?ref=lof