16
Berkman Center Broadband Study Thomas W. Hazlett Professor of Law & Economics [email protected] http://mason.gmu.edu/~thazlett/ Federal Communications Commission December 10, 2009

Berkman Center Broadband Study

  • Upload
    denver

  • View
    37

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Berkman Center Broadband Study. Thomas W. Hazlett Professor of Law & Economics [email protected] http://mason.gmu.edu/~thazlett/ Federal Communications Commission December 10, 2009. Three Areas to Discuss. Econometric and data issues Global broadband rankings - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Berkman Center Broadband Study

Berkman Center Broadband Study

Thomas W. HazlettProfessor of Law & [email protected]://mason.gmu.edu/~thazlett/

Federal Communications CommissionDecember 10, 2009

Page 2: Berkman Center Broadband Study

Three Areas to Discuss

• Econometric and data issues• Global broadband rankings • Natural experiments in U.S. broadband

Page 3: Berkman Center Broadband Study

Global Broadband Race

Page 4: Berkman Center Broadband Study

Three Broadband Regimes

Period Cable Modems Telecoms/DSL

Page 5: Berkman Center Broadband Study

Three Broadband Regimes

Period Cable Modems Telecoms/DSL

unregulated

unregulated

unregulated

Page 6: Berkman Center Broadband Study

Three Broadband Regimes

Period Cable Modems Telecoms/DSL

until 1Q2003 unregulatedregulated with “line sharing”

obligation

unregulated

unregulated

Page 7: Berkman Center Broadband Study

Three Broadband Regimes

Period Cable Modems Telecoms/DSL

until 1Q2003 unregulatedregulated with “line sharing”

obligation1Q2003 to

3Q2005 unregulatedregulated but

no “line sharing”

unregulated

Page 8: Berkman Center Broadband Study

Three Broadband Regimes

Period Cable Modems Telecoms/DSL

until 1Q2003 unregulatedregulated with “line sharing”

obligation1Q2003 to

3Q2005 unregulatedregulated but

no “line sharing”

3Q2005 topresent unregulated deregulated

Page 9: Berkman Center Broadband Study

1st Period: Cable Dominates

0

2

4

6

8

10

12D

ec-9

9

Jun-

00

Dec

-00

Jun-

01

Dec

-01

Jun-

02

Dec

-02

ADSL (inmillions)Cable Modem(in millions)

Subs

crib

ers (

in m

illio

ns)

Page 10: Berkman Center Broadband Study

Causality asserted by the FCC• “[W]e don't have a duopoly in broadband.

We don't even have a monopoly in broadband. We have a ‘no-opoly.’ 

• “So how do we get Americans broadband pipes? .. [B]y letting a competitive marketplace thrive.”

– FCC Chairman William E. Kennard (No. Calif. FCBA, San Francisco, CA, July 20, 1999)

• and rejecting “open access” rules

Page 11: Berkman Center Broadband Study

2nd Period: DSL Surges

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

351Q

99

3Q99

1Q00

3Q00

1Q01

3Q01

1Q02

3Q02

1Q03

3Q03

1Q04

3Q04

1Q05

3Q05

1Q06

3Q06

DSL

Cable

DSL 'Line Sharing' Dereg

65% above trend

Num

ber

of S

ubsc

ribe

rs (i

n m

illio

ns) 11%

above trend

Page 12: Berkman Center Broadband Study

3rd Period: DSL Surges Again

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

1Q99

3Q99

1Q00

3Q00

1Q01

3Q01

1Q02

3Q02

1Q03

3Q03

1Q04

3Q04

1Q05

3Q05

1Q06

3Q06

DSL

Cable

DSL Dereg II

TrendII

DSL 'Line Sharing' Dereg 12%

above trend

Num

ber

of S

ubsc

ribe

rs (i

n m

illio

ns)

1% above trend

'Line Sharing'

Trend

Page 13: Berkman Center Broadband Study

FTTH Deployment in USA

0

2 ,0 0 0

4 ,0 0 0

6 ,0 0 0

8 ,0 0 0

1 0 ,0 0 0

1 2 ,0 0 0

1 4 ,0 0 0

1 6 ,0 0 0

H om es P as s ed (in thous ands )

H om es C onnec ted (in thous ands )

Page 14: Berkman Center Broadband Study

Pre- and Post-Deregulation

0

2 ,0 0 0

4 ,0 0 0

6 ,0 0 0

8 ,0 0 0

1 0 ,0 0 0

1 2 ,0 0 0

1 4 ,0 0 0

1 6 ,0 0 0

H om es P as s ed (in thous ands )

H om es C onnec ted (in thous ands )

FCC pre-empts fiber unbundling requirements

Page 15: Berkman Center Broadband Study

Causality ascribed

Page 16: Berkman Center Broadband Study

Thank you.