Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Big data:Comparing apples with apples to support improvement in
healthcare
20 April 2018
Dr Gail Prileszky General Manager
Non-profit membership groupHonour CodeOver 90 Health ServicesOver 160 FacilitiesShare problemsShare solutionsProvides informal networkNon-political
The Health Roundtable …An Innovation Clearinghouse since 1995
© 2016 Confidential Draft Discussion Document 2
Focus on Benchmarking for Innovation: Screening toolSearch for differencesIdentify exemplars
Health Roundtable: A ‘knowledge’ company, empowering potential
Data Collection & Standardisation
Analysis & Inquiry
Insight &
Networking
Innovation,
Knowledge….. Enable Action
• Software• AI + • Data
science• Integration
of broad data scope
• Visualisation• Clinical /
Health informatics
• Research support
• Data story telling
• Industry expertise
• Collective intelligence – virtualised networking
• Accelerating innovation & uptake
• Libraries & communities of knowledge
• Action oriented services.
Health Roundtable: Big data
© 2016 Confidential Draft Discussion Document 4
Why is benchmarking useful?
© 2016 Confidential Draft Discussion Document 5
Why is benchmarking useful?
© 2016 Confidential Draft Discussion Document 6
Big data – searchlights not spotlights
© 2016 Confidential Draft Discussion Document 7
Big data shows variance but does not verify cause and effect
Randomised controlled trials and audits give cause and effect (probably)
How do we support member hospitals?
On site and webinar support from Relationship Managers
Analytics, Insights & Workflow – Activity Bar Coding, Codecheck
Innovation & Collaboration – Innovations Awards, Library and Roadshow
Improvement Programs – Financial Improvement Group
My Patients are sicker!How do we risk adjust your data?
© 2016 Confidential Draft Discussion Document 9
“Relative Stay Index” (RSI) : a risk adjusted measure of length of stay standardised across
– 700 Diagnosis Related Groups (using DRG 7.0)– Age group – 0, 1-16, 17-34, 35-49, 50-64, 65-79, 80+– Admission type - same day emergency / overnight emergency / elective– Arrival source : transfer in /normal admit– Discharge destination : home, died, statistical discharge, transfer up, transfer
down– Comorbidity level: 3+ co-morbidities from separate ICD10 chapters– Caretype
“Expected” length of stay calculated for each episode using average length of stay from index period Jul 2013 – Jun 2016 (16M episodes)
Example of RSI for Gall Bladder Surgery (H08A)
© 2015 Confidential Draft Discussion Document
10
My Patients are sicker!How do we risk adjust your data?
© 2016 Confidential Draft Discussion Document 11
“Relative Cost Index” (RCI) : a risk adjusted measure of cost of stay standardised across
– 700 Diagnosis Related Groups (using DRG 7.0)– Age group – 0, 1-16, 17-34, 35-49, 50-64, 65-79, 80+– Admission type - same day emergency / overnight emergency / elective– Arrival source : transfer in /normal admit– Discharge destination : home, died, statistical discharge, transfer up, transfer
down– Comorbidity level: 3+ co-morbidities from separate ICD10 chapters– Caretype
“Expected” cost of stay calculated for each episode using average cost of stay from index period Jul 2013 – Jun 2016 (5M episodes)
www.healthroundtable.org
© 2016 Confidential Draft Discussion Document 12
Anyone from a member health service can register on our website using their
health service email address!
Drill down through reports to understand safety, effectiveness of care and efficiency
© 2016 Confidential Draft Discussion Document 13
Highlight improvement opportunities andlearn from exemplars
© 2016 Confidential Draft Discussion Document 14
Big data helps identify variance andexemplars
© 2016 Confidential Draft Discussion Document 15
High quality healthcare costs less
© 2016 Confidential Draft Discussion Document 16
Comparision of cost of not delivering‘perfect’ care
© 2016 Confidential Draft Discussion Document 17
1. Vivian S Lee et al. Implementation of a Value Driven Outcomes Program to identify high variability in clinical costs and outcomes in association with reduced cost and improved quality. JAMA 2016:316 (10): 1061-1072
Risk adjustment Pricing for Complications 2018/19
© 2016 Confidential Draft Discussion Document 18
National Efficient Price Determinationhttps://www.ihpa.gov.au/publications/national-efficient-
price-determination-2018-19
© 2016 Confidential Draft Discussion Document 19
Major Hospital Acquired Complications
List derived from ACsQHC Hospital Acquired Complications v1.1
Profile: Major Hospital Acquired Complications
45 Hospitals 2016/17 Data
• Total Episodes with HAC 51,267• Total HAC Incidents 90,616• Cost $2.01 billion• Revenue $1.75 billion• Profit / Loss $260 million (13%)
Highest Volume HAC: Cardiac Complications – DeliriumTotal Episodes: 10,488Total Loss: $42 million
© 2016 Confidential Draft Discussion Document 20
HACs cost more than they earn in revenue –2016/17
© 2016 Confidential Draft Discussion Document 21