105
1 Bio-Optimized Technologies to keep Thermoplastics out of Landfills and the Environment Bio-Optimized Technologies to keep Thermoplastics out of Landfills and the Environment (BOTTLE) Technology Session Review Area: Performance-Advantaged Bioproducts, Bioprocessing Separations, and Plastics PI: Gregg T. Beckham, National Renewable Energy Laboratory National Laboratory and University Co-PIs: Alberta Carpenter, National Renewable Energy Laboratory Taraka Dale, Los Alamos National Laboratory Adam Guss, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Christopher Tassone, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Meltem Urgun-Demirtas, Argonne National Laboratory Linda Broadbelt, Northwestern University Eugene Chen, Colorado State University Jennifer DuBois, Montana State University John McGeehan, University of Portsmouth Yuriy Román-Leshkov, MIT

Bio-Optimized Technologies to Keep Thermoplastics out of

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

1

Bio-Optimized Technologies to keep Thermoplastics out of Landfills and the Environment

Bio-Optimized Technologies to keep Thermoplastics out of Landfills and the Environment (BOTTLE)Technology Session Review Area: Performance-Advantaged Bioproducts, Bioprocessing Separations, and Plastics

PI: Gregg T. Beckham, National Renewable Energy LaboratoryNational Laboratory and University Co-PIs: Alberta Carpenter, National Renewable Energy LaboratoryTaraka Dale, Los Alamos National LaboratoryAdam Guss, Oak Ridge National LaboratoryChristopher Tassone, SLAC National Accelerator LaboratoryMeltem Urgun-Demirtas, Argonne National LaboratoryLinda Broadbelt, Northwestern UniversityEugene Chen, Colorado State UniversityJennifer DuBois, Montana State UniversityJohn McGeehan, University of PortsmouthYuriy Román-Leshkov, MIT

2

• The plastics pollution problem• Context for the BOTTLE Consortium• Brief history of BOTTLE to date• Project goals • Framing BOTTLE via the Heilmeier Catechism

BOTTLE Project Overview

33

Plastics pollution

• Growing awareness of the plastics waste problem in the last decade

• Plastics pollution is basically found everywhere researchers look

Data from Jambeck et al. Science 2015; Image from Ellen MacArthur Foundation Images from Fortune, Huffington Post, BBC

Image from Brahney et al. Science 2020

Image from Lamb et al. Science 2018

44

Current recycling approachesCurrent plastics waste management and recycling approaches are limited:• Recycled plastics often lower quality and value• Mech. recycling not applicable to all polymers• Little economic incentive for plastics reclamation

Image from Van Geem et al. Waste Management 2017

Methods “beyond” mechanical recycling for waste plastics: energy recovery, pyrolysis, and gasification

Images from ChemWeek, Plastics News Europe, C&E News

55

Context for the BOTTLE Consortium

Why should DOE labs work on waste plastics?

• ~6% of world fossil fuel consumption used to make polymers (equivalent to global aviation sector)1

• Projected to increase to 20% global fossil consumption by 20501

• US likely generates most plastic waste globally2

Image from DOE Plastics Innovation Challenge Roadmap, 2021 (Data from IEA 2018) 1. EMF The New Plastics Economy, 2016; 2. K Lavender Law et al. Science Advances 2020

Biomass and plastics share a few key attributes:

• Low-value, disperse, heterogeneous, solid polymers

Can we apply expertise in biomass conversion to develop economically viable, sustainable solutions for plastic waste that go beyond conventional approaches?

66

Project history• DOE issued Plastics Innovation Challenge

• FY20 seed project jointly funded by BETO and AMO to establish the BOTTLE Consortium

• Aimed to establish a complementary team to conduct analysis-guided R&D in plastics upcycling

• BOTTLE aimed to be complementary to other DOE activities in this space: REMADE, EFRCs, etc.

• DOE Lab Call expanded team in mid-FY20

• Began 3-year project in FY21 (October 2020)

Image from DOE Plastics Innovation Challenge Roadmap, 2021

77

Project overview: BOTTLE vision, mission, and goalsThe vision for BOTTLE is to deliver selective and scalable technologies that enable cost-effective recycling, upcycling, and increased energy efficiency for plastics

The mission of BOTTLE is to: • Develop robust processes to upcycle existing waste

plastics, and • Develop new plastics and processes that are recyclable-

by-design

The goals of BOTTLE are:• Develop chemical/biological processes to deconstruct and

upcycle today’s plastics• Design chemistries and recycling processes for

tomorrow’s plastics that are recyclable-by-design• Work with industry to catalyze a new upcycling paradigms• Leverage DOE investments in process development,

catalysis, materials, and analysis-driven R&D

Hong & Chen, Trends Chem. 2019, 1, 148

88

Project overview: Heilmeier Catechism framingWhat are you trying to do?• Develop selective, scalable processes to deconstruct and upcycle today’s plastics and thermosets• Redesign tomorrow’s plastics to be recyclable-by-design (RBD) and derived from bio-based feedstocks

How is it done today?• Most plastics that are recycled are down-cycled and many are not recyclable at all• Energy recovery and thermochemical conversion methods have substantial limitations

Why is this problem important:• Waste plastics are both an energy & environmental problem

What are the risks?There are many risks, including (but not limited to):• challenges deconstructing and upcycling realistic plastic waste, • unable to develop technologies that out-perform energy recovery and/or pyrolysis,• unable to redesign tomorrow’s plastics with cost/performance that incentivize adoption

9

• Project team• Organizational leadership• Research task structure • Industry engagement and communications plans• Reporting and decision making• Collaboration and communication• Project risks and mitigation plans

BOTTLE Management

1010

Team structure

1111

Leadership TeamBOTTLE Leadership Team (LT):• CEO, COO, & PM• Oversee the Management task• Weekly meetings• Role focused on leadership of BOTTLE

CEO COO PM

1212

Governing Board

Governing Board (GB):• BOTTLE LT, lab and several univ. leads, DOE• Yearly strategic planning meeting• Role focused on management, strategy• Provide advisory input on:

– BOTTLE priorities,– maintaining the BOTTLE mission in

alignment with DOE, – industrial engagement, – finances and project management,– facilities and operations, and– management concerns

1313

Science Leadership Team

Science Leadership Team (SLT):• CEO, all institutional leads, DOE• Yearly planning meeting,

teleconferences every other month• Role focused on research execution• Establish key technical challenges,

including annual review of BOTTLE R&D portfolio

• Implement and supervise research projects at each institution

• Foster inter-institutional collaborations• Recommend future projects within

each Consortium area

1414

BOTTLE SLT team and expertise

ORNL – Adam Guss- Prospecting and gene hunting- Synthetic and systems biology- Genetic tool development

LANL – Taraka Dale- Computational protein design- Strain and enzyme evolution- Biosensor development

NREL – Bob Allen- Process development- Biological and chemical catalysis- Polymer chemistry

MIT – Yuriy Román- Heterogeneous catalysis- Reaction engineering- Electrochemistry

Montana State – Jen DuBois- Enzyme biochemistry

Colorado State – Eugene Chen- Bio-based plastics and redesign- New building blocks- Homogeneous catalysis

ANL – Meltem Urgun-Demirtas- End of life testing (EOL) and

toxicity studies

Northwestern – Linda Broadbelt- Computational modeling including DFT and

chemical operators/retrosynthesis

SLAC – Chris Tassone- Time-resolved and space-resolved

in situ/operando experiments- Polymer physics and chemistry- Chemical catalysis

U of Portsmouth – John McGeehan- Structural biology- Protein biophysics- Centre for Enzyme Innovation (CEI)

NREL – Birdie Carpenter- Analysis including TEA, LCA,

MFI, and EEIO modeling

1515

Technical Advisory Board and Comm. CouncilTechnical Advisory Board (TAB):• Feedback on R&D, operations, management• Invited diverse group of thought leaders from

academia, government, industry, non-profits• TAB represents key points in the plastics value

chain to ensure robust assessment of BOTTLE• Convene annually (virtually or in-person)• Provide written evaluations to DOE, BOTTLE LT• Includes leads of complementary large R&D

efforts in this space

Commercialization Council:• Representative from each partner institution• Central “storefront” for accessing BOTTLE IP

through partnership and licensing• Promote rapid deployment of BOTTLE IP

1616

Research TasksDeconstruction: • Led by experts in biocatalysis (T. Dale, LANL)

and chemical catalysis (Y. Román, MIT)• Focus: selective depolymerization of today’s

plastics

Upcycling:• Led by expert in genetics and metabolic

engineering (A. Guss, ORNL)• Focus: converting intermediates from today’s

plastics to high-value materials• Bridging task between Deconstruction and

Redesign

Redesign:• Led by expert in circular polymers (E. Chen,

CSU)• Focus: creating recyclable-by-design (RBD)

polymers to replace commodity plastics

1717

Cross-Cutting TasksAnalysis: • Led by analysis expert (B. Carpenter, NREL)• Focus: TEA, LCA, EEIO, and other analysis

tools to map to BOTTLE key metrics

Characterization:• Led by experts in materials biodegradation

(M. Urgun-Demirtas, ANL) and synchrotron-based characterization (C. Tassone, SLAC)

• Focus on polymer end-of-life testing and in situ/in operando characterization of catalytic processes and new materials

Modeling:• Led by expert in polymer kinetics, theory, and

retrosynthesis (L. Broadbelt, NU)• Focus on deconstruction modeling and

polymer redesign via machine learning and pathway predictions

1818

Funding allocations by task and discipline

By task By discipline

1919

Industry engagement and communication plans

Communications LeadKathy Cisar

Industry Engagement and OutreachBob Baldwin & Ron Schoon

Commercialization Council LeadEric Payne

• Both plans established at the FY20 BOTTLE all-hands meeting• Centralized industry engagement effort• BOTTLE GB developed plans in FY21 and received positive feedback

Industry Engagement:• Led by Bob Baldwin and Ron Schoon• Coordinated outreach guided by industry landscape analysis• Developed standard promotional documents• Progress updates provided monthly• Responsible for monitoring the BOTTLE.org e-mail address• IPMP, CRADA and NDAs coordinated by Eric Payne

Communications:• Led by Kathy Cisar• POC for www.BOTTLE.org content• Coordinates news stories with BOTTLE partners and DOE• Organized development of logos, templates, etc.• Working on webinars and social media presence• Meets regularly with BOTTLE LT

2020

Reporting and decision makingProgress tracking & reporting• Use PM software for operational efficiency • Developed templates for reports and milestones• Frequent communication ensures timely milestone

adjustment, if needed• Annual BOTTLE Research Review (FY21 milestone)

On- and off-boarding projects:• BOTTLE conducts analysis-guided R&D • All major projects benchmarked to our key metrics• Advisory input for our R&D portfolio from the TAB

Resource allocation:• BOTTLE GB assesses resource allocations annually using active PM principles, SLT input, tracking

deliverable contribution and completion metrics, and progress towards analysis-guided research impact

2121

Collaboration and communication

Fortnightly BOTTLE R&D meetings:• Purpose: communication and collaboration for each

project in BOTTLE• Attendance: all BOTTLE members• Recorded via Dropbox Paper

Annual all-hands meeting• Purpose: foster collaboration, develop the next FY

project plan• Attendance: all BOTTLE members

Data Management Plan (DMP):• Created and approved by SLT in FY20 • Meets the DOE Public Access Plan criteria• Utilizes Dropbox for transparency and access

to all BOTTLE members

Monthly meetings with DOE Technology Managers• Purpose: updates on BOTTLE progress• Attendance: AMO and BETO TMs, technical

presenter(s) from BOTTLE, and BOTTLE LT• Recorded via Box Note

2222

Project risks and mitigation plansRisk: Geographically-distributed partner institutions adversely impact research coordination

Mitigation: Frequent, documented R&D meetings ensure active collaboration. Slack for daily interactions.

Risk: Research priorities unclear and resources not used effectivelyMitigation: Project priority documents created at start of FYs to outline priorities.

Risk: Industry engagement will be mostly virtual, limiting our ability to develop projectsMitigation: Developing virtual tours and content to showcase BOTTLE’s capabilities. Planning several virtual webinars with DOE.

Risk: Merit Review of BOTTLE identified a critical gap of material science expertiseMitigation: BOTTLE on-boarded an industrial polymer chemist (Bob Allen, formerly IBM), via institutional investments at NREL.

Risk: COVID-19 will impact both near- and long-term activitiesMitigation: Developed a ‘COVID-19 Contingency Plan’ with SLT, including: all meetings using a virtual platform, frequent COVID-19 check-ins with SLT, and utilization of a cloud-based folder for all materials

23

• Carbon, economic, and energy metrics• BOTTLE R&D approach• Analysis efforts• Substrate considerations• Milestones• Task descriptions, approach, primary projects, and risks

BOTTLE Approach

2424

Metrics for BOTTLE projectsThe mission of BOTTLE is to: • Develop robust processes to upcycle existing waste plastics, and • Develop new plastics and processes that are recyclable-by-design

BOTTLE projects will aim to meet 3 key metrics:Energy:• ≥50% energy savings relative to virgin material production• Closed-loop recycling estimated to save 40-90% energy1

Carbon:• ≥75% carbon utilization from waste plastics• Estimated based on recycling of commodity thermoplasticsEconomics:• ≥ 2x economic incentive over reclaimed materials

1. Rahimi and Garcia, Nature Reviews Chemistry, 2017

25

www.bottle.org

2626

Analysis-guided R&D• Analysis guides which polymers we work on• Techno-economic analysis (TEA) using Aspen Plus• Energy/GHG assessment via Materials Flows through Industry (MFI)• All major BOTTLE projects evaluated for C, $, and E metrics• Economics and sustainability assumptions follow transparent practices in EERE-funded R&D

Approach to analysis• Work with Analysis in parallel to lab R&D• Mass & energy balances early in projects• Evaluate ability to meet key metrics based on

“theoretical maximum” case • As projects increase in TRL, they merit more

in-depth analysis• Analysis is a primary risk mitigation tool to

focus R&D

2727

SubstratesSubstrates present several challenges:• Realistic substrates contain additives that may influence upcycling feasibility• Rigorous polymer characterizations are key

• Lessons from biomass: Poor characterization leads to failures and lack of confidence in the field

• Ensure reproducibility of BOTTLE research and be a positive example for the field

• Use model substrates (for reproducibility) and real substrates (for feasibility)

• BOTTLE appointed a “Substrate Czar” for substrate procurement and characterization

film powder fiber

≠ ≠

Image from GoodFellow website

2828

Milestones, Go/No-Go decisionsAbbreviated milestones:

• FY21: ML pipeline to predict the Tg of RBD polymers, analysis on ≥2 RBD polymers

• FY22 G/NG: Down-select C-C bond cleavage strategies using analysis

• FY23: Deconstruction/Upcycling: 3 methods to cleave C-C bonds and upcycle intermediates

• FY23: Redesign: 10 RBD polymers able to be produced at ≤$2.50/lb

• FY23: Analysis: ≥10 analyses for BOTTLE processes to achieve C, $, and E metrics

• FY23: Modeling: Computational pipeline to predict RBD polymers with target properties

• FY23: Characterization: 3 Laboratory Analytical Procedures

Image from Ellis, Rorrer, Sullivan, Otto, McGeehan, Román, Wierckx, Beckham, in revision at Nature Catalysis

Annual Review for BOTTLE projects:

Yearly portfolio review to on-board and off-board projects as dictated by analysis conducted the previous year

FY21 Industry Engagement:

Establish new industry-led, funds-in partnerships to tackle pressing commercial challenges

2929

Deconstruction

• Led by Taraka Dale (LANL) and Yuriy Román (MIT)• Thermal, electro, bio, photo-catalysis• Participants: LANL, MIT, MSU, NREL, ORNL, SLAC, UoP

Primary projects:• C-C bond cleavage catalysis via thermal, electro-,

and photo-catalytic methods• Selective deconstruction of mixed plastics• Enzymatic and organocatalytic process development

for C-O and C-N-linked polymers

Risks:• Catalytic deconstruction of plastics as solids will

scale with surface area – may inherently limit rates• Additives may deactivate or inhibit catalysts

3030

Upcycling• Led by Adam Guss (ORNL)• Biological and chemo-catalytic conversion• Participants: NREL and ORNL

Primary projects:• Bioconversion of Deconstruction intermediates• Discovery of new pathways to assimilate new

intermediates from Deconstruction, and• Consolidated biological deconstruction and

upcycling of C-O and C-N-linked polymers

Risks:• We are unable to identify metabolic pathways for some deconstruction products and/or additives• Bio-upcycling approaches are too slow to be economical and/or unable to meet carbon goals

3131

Redesign• Led by Eugene Chen (CSU)• This task will create RBD polymers to replace today’s

plastics with Deconstruction and Upcycling• Participants: ANL, CSU, MIT, NREL, ORNL, SLAC

Primary projects:• Redesign projects include new routes to replace PE,

PP, PS, PET, nylons, PU, and more• Modeling and analysis used to design atom-efficient,

cost-effective routes for new monomer syntheses

Risks:• We are unable to produce RBD polymers at commodity prices and achieve >50% energy savings

relative to today's materials• Performance of RBD circular polymers cannot match that of today’s commodity plastics

3232

Analysis, Characterization, and Modeling Task Leads:• Analysis: Birdie Carpenter (NREL)• Characterization: Chris Tassone (SLAC) & Meltem Urgun-Demirtas (ANL)• Modeling: Linda Broadbelt (NU)• Cross-cutting Tasks integrated into Research Tasks

Primary projects:• Analysis: TEA, LCA, and EEIO to guide R&D• Characterization: analytics and characterization including wet chemistry,

catalyst, polymer, biodegradation, and synchrotron-based characterizations• Modeling: Chemical operators for synthesis predictions, machine learning to

predict polymer properties, DFT, and kinetic modeling

Risks:• Monomer design space is vast, testing all potential leads from computation is prohibitive• Analysis tools may not be able to access reliable global supply chain data for baseline analyses

33

• Scientific• Industrial

BOTTLE Impact

Image from https://www.altmetric.com/details/91362881 (BOTTLE 2020 paper)

3434

ImpactScientific:• Analysis-guided R&D distinguishes BOTTLE

from basic science efforts – able to compare approaches in a self-consistent, rigorous, agnostic manner

• Focus on impactful publications and patents that encompass inter-disciplinary science, engineering, and analysis

• Standards development for both substrate characterization and analysis-guided R&D benchmarks to enable consistency within BOTTLE research tasks and across other plastics deconstruction scientific efforts

Image from Ellis, Rorrer, Sullivan, Otto, McGeehan, Román, Wierckx, Beckham, in revision at Nature Catalysis

Image from Nicholson, Rorrer, Carpenter, Beckham, Joule 2021

3535

Impact

Industrial:• Analysis-guided R&D to inform viability of both BOTTLE and

external technologies to ensure relevance

• Working with industry via CRADAs – provides feedback to DOE-funded efforts to guide R&D

• Comm. Council setup for facile tech. transfer

• TAB includes industry leaders to ensure robust assessment of BOTTLE technologies

• Business Development investments from institutions to solve industry’s most critical problems

• Industrial collaboration through BOTTLE FOA awards

Overall: BOTTLE conducts interdisciplinary, industry-relevant, and process-enabling research to deconstruct and upcycle today’s plastics and redesign tomorrow’s plastics

36

• Foundational documents• Industry engagement• Communication materials• FOA and Lab Call proposals• Consortium launch

BOTTLE Progress and Outcomes: Setting up BOTTLE

3737

Foundational Documents• IPMP – Intellectual Property Management Plan

– Document that enables industry access to BOTTLE innovations

– Agreed to by all Academic Partners

• Governance plan: outlines BOTTLE management structure

• CRADA: Developed standard set of pre-approved CRADA documents for BOTTLE engagements

• MMTA: Allows for materials transfer between BOTTLE members

• NDA: Protects confidential information to promote free exchange of information among BOTTLE members

• Data Management Plan

• FOA US Manufacturing Plan

3838

Industry Engagement• Developed pre-approved CRADA documents for BOTTLE

engagements that are available on the BOTTLE website

• Streamlined access to BOTTLE innovations to maximize industrial impact

– Rights to Subject Inventions in CRADA – address option terms, royalties, cooperation among joint IP owners, publications, etc.

• Over 80 companies engaged to date

• We are placing an emphasis on contacting companies that span the Plastics Value Chain

– Primary plastics production

– Raw material production

– Manufacture and use

• Identified key companies using an industry landscape analysis

• Currently negotiating five separate proposals

3939

Communication and MessagingGoal: Develop uniform BOTTLE messaging materials for one cohesive message across 10 institutions

Deconstruction Upcycling Redesign

Analysis Characterization Modeling

Developed www.BOTTLE.org• Provides updates to external parties on recent

publications & news• ‘Contact Us’ page for direct engagement• ‘Join Us’ page contains CRADA documents for

transparent partnership mechanisms

Presentation Materials• Slide templates for uniform presentations (used for this presentation)• Icons: provide visual context to Research Tasks• Placemat slide: conveys BOTTLE’s approach in a single image

4040

Communication and Messaging

Branding Materials• Designed a BOTTLE logo to show the monomer

breakdown products upcycled into new product s• Inspired the tagline “Changing the way we recycle”

Industry Engagement• Created a ‘1-pager’ for initial industry engagement• Designed overview slides for industry presentations to

streamline pre-NDA conversations• Developed an Org chart as a visual representation of

BOTTLE structure

4141

ProposalsLab Call:• Hosted webinar with DOE labs to solicit input and develop

complementary partnerships in BOTTLE• Participated in two rounds of Lab Calls in FY20• First round onboarded ANL, NU, and SLAC• Second round finalized 3-year AOP for BOTTLE

BOTTLE FOA: Topic Area 3 (TA3) designed to allow applicants to propose work with BOTTLE Consortium

• All potential TA3 applicants sent inquiries via www.BOTTLE.org

• Documented all interactions via the BOTTLE email/website

• All TA3 inquiries discussed with BOTTLE SLT to determine scope fit and appropriate BOTTLE partners

• 9 full TA3 proposals submitted, 3 selected for awards:• University of Wisconsin-Madison, University of Minnesota, and University of Delaware

4242

Official FY21 launch of BOTTLE project

• BOTTLE officially started on October 1st, 2020

• Two-day kickoff meeting held on Oct. 20 & 21

• Have an executed IPMP

• 10 AOPs were submitted to AMO and BETO

• 7 R&D meetings have been held

• A SLT meeting held in December

• All-hands meeting will be scheduled in Q3

• Paper and patent application pipeline starting to increase substantially

Future Work in FY21: Finalize TAB and hold inaugural meeting (summer), finalize CRADAs with BOTTLE FOA TA3 partners, and expand website content to highlight partnerships and capabilities

43

Bio-Optimized Technologies to keep Thermoplastics out of Landfills and the Environment

First Q&A section

1

• Analysis• Characterization• Deconstruction• Upcycling• Redesign & Modeling

BOTTLE Progress and Outcomes: R&D

2

www.bottle.org

3

• Analysis scope and tools• Benchmarking today’s plastics manufacturing• Ongoing analysis in thermal recycling methods• Ongoing analysis in PET chemical recycling• Illustrative analysis for enzymatic PET recycling

Analysis

44

Analysis Scope – TEA, MFI, and EEIO Modeling

Three complementary analysis scopes:• Techno-Economic Analysis (TEA): economics of prospective technology at the plant level• Materials Flows through Industry (MFI): environmental impacts at the supply chain level• Economically-Extended Input-Output (EEIO): economic and environmental impacts at the economy level

55

BOTTLE technologies require accurate baselines

• Goal: Estimate supply chain energy and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from US-based plastics consumption

• Scope: Polymers with global consumption of ≥1 MMT per year

• Output: Estimates of energy and GHG emissions from MFI supply chain analyses

SR Nicholson, NA Rorrer, AC Carpenter, GT Beckham, Joule 2021

66

Supply chain energy and GHG emissions analysis

Plastics consumption accounts for 3.2 Quads/yr and 104 MMT CO2e/yr in the US• Metrics enable comparison of new recycling technology for today’s plastics or replacements• If an organization has candidate recycling, circular, or bio-based technologies to compare business-as-usual, these data

serve are a baseline• MFI is publicly available for use so anyone can access this tool to compare their candidate processes• Ongoing work: extending this analysis to MFI Global

SR Nicholson, NA Rorrer, AC Carpenter, GT Beckham, Joule 2021

77SR Nicholson, NA Rorrer, AC Carpenter, GT Beckham, Joule 2021

Enabling outcomes of benchmarking analysis

Exemplary case study on polyolefins highlights both the per kg and total energy and GHG emissions in the US annually• Similar case studies included for all 18 polymers

GP = general purpose IM = injection molded

88

Ongoing analysis: Benchmarking pyrolysis and gasification

• Goal: Evaluate pyrolysis and gasification of mixed plastic waste to benchmark new recycling technologies against them

• Scope: Use literature and patent data to inform mass & energy balances

• Output:

– Transparent, peer-reviewed design cases for plastics pyrolysis and gasification available for the community

– Baseline estimates of carbon, economics, and energy metrics for these processes

G Yadav, A Singh et al. in preparation; S Afzal, A Singh et al. in preparation

99

Glycolysis

Methanolysis

Ammonolysis

Aminolysis

Chemical(solvolysis)

Thermo-chemical Pyrolysis

Bis(2-Hydroxyethyl) terephthalate

Oligomers

Dimethyl terephthalate

Terephthalamide

Bis(2-hydroxyethylene) terephthalamide

PET Recycling Technologies

Enzymatic

Various gas and liquid products (e.g., CO, benzoic acid, etc.)

Ethylene glycol

Terephthalic acid

Hydrolysis

Ongoing analysis: PET Recycling

• Goal: Evaluate and compare proposed PET chemical recycling strategies

• Scope: Use literature and patent data to inform mass & energy balances

G Yadav, A Singh et al. in preparation; S Afzal, A Singh et al. in preparation, A Singh et al. in review

• Output: Transparent cases for PET chemical recycling, estimates of C, $, and E metrics for these processes

1010

Example: PET enzymatic hydrolysisGoals:• Determine key drivers for community to

enable enzymatic PET depolymerization

• Provide base model to compare enzyme-based approaches for PET recycling to chemo-catalytic and thermal methods

• Highlight areas for further impactful development of biocatalysis-enabled plastics recycling

Methods:• TEA, MFI, EEIO (BEIOM)• Process data from patent and peer-

reviewed literature

Figure: (Top) Simplified process flow diagram of the PET enzymatic depolymerization process(Bottom) A representation of the bottom-up supply chain model (MFI tool) scope and top-down environmentally-extended input-output (BEIOM model) scope

A Singh, NA Rorrer, SR Nicholson, E Erickson, J DesVeaux et al. in review EEIO = environmentally-extended, input-output, rTPA = recycled terephthalic acid

1111

Example: Analysis results for PET enzymatic hydrolysis

Enzymatic PET recycling shows substantial promise relative to virgin polyester manufacturing:• TEA Impacts (Aspen) :

– Recycled TPA from enzymatic recycling predicted to be $1.93/kg from processed, clean flake ($0.66/kg)

– Cheaper feedstock enables cost parity;TPA price $0.50 – $1.50/kg

– Other major drivers: solids loading and process yield

A Singh, NA Rorrer, SR Nicholson, E Erickson, J DesVeaux et al. in review• Supply Chain Impacts (MFI) :

– Supply-chain energy reduced by 69-83% – GHG emissions by 17-43% per kg of TPA– Major drivers: mechanical pretreatment and EG recovery

• EEIO Impacts (BEIOM) :– Reduce broader environmental impacts up to 95%– Up to 45% more socio-economic benefits

12

• Characterization Scope• Characterization Capabilities• Advanced synchrotron-based characterization• Biodegradation capabilities for polymers from Redesign

Characterization

1313

Characterization Scope –Mechanisms, structure and EOL

Three complementary characterization scopes:• Mechanistic Determination, quantification of products, and elucidating kinetics enables us to improve process

efficiency, product selectivity, and process compatibility• Polymer structure characterization used to determine relationships between polymer chemistry, and its

associated structure and performance to improve redesigned polymers• End-of-Life (EOL) determines environmental impacts of redesigned polymers in natural (soil and fresh water) and

engineered environments (landfill, composting, and anaerobic digester)

Mechanism Determination Polymer Structure End-of-Life

1414

Analytics, catalyst, and polymer characterization capabilitiesAnalytical chemistry:Multiple high-resolution GC-MS, LC-MS instruments for small-molecule identification and proteomics

Laboratory-scale polymer characterization:GPC, HT-GPC, thermal, mechanical, barrier, particle size measurements, multiple spectroscopies, etc.

Laboratory-scale catalyst characterization:Automated ML-driven catalyst synthesis, catalyst characterization tools (BET, EPR, TPR/TPD, ICP-MS, etc.)

Laboratory-scale microscopy:AFM, FT-IR, Raman, SEM, TEM, cryoEM (SLAC), including in situ capabilities with heating stages

1515

Advanced characterization capabilitiesX-ray scattering:Multiple beamlines to characterize polymer substrate evolution during deconstruction, substrate-catalyst interactions, and structure-property relationships in redesigned polymers

X-ray imagingImagine capabilities with resolution from nm to µm scales. Full spectral-tomographic reconstruction to visualize catalyst-substrate interaction to inform process design

X-ray SpectroscopyMultiple beamlines to characterize the structural trajectory during reactions with fs resolution. Elucidate mechanisms and describe the substrate-catalyst active electronic coupling

Cryo-EMWorld leading cryo-EM capabilities with atomic resolution to determine structure in non-crystalline samples. Imaging of amorphous polymers and structural work on biocatalysts.

1616

End-of-Life (EOL) Testing CapabilitiesSoil Biodegradation (ASTM D5988)CO2 produced over time is captured via desiccators (incubated in dark) containing CO2 trap (0.5 N KOH)

High Solids Anaerobic Biodegradation (ASTM D5511)High solids (20%) inoculum degrades sample and gas produced is measured via GC and gas bag volume

Freshwater Biodegradation (ISO 14851)Samples placed in freshwater medium and % biodegradation tracked via dissolved oxygen over time

Composting Biodegradation ( ASTM D5338)Compost degrades samples and gas is measured via GC, gas bag volume, and/or on-line gas volume system

1717

Ongoing characterization: PET Deconstruction

• Goal: Determine deconstruction mechanisms of homogeneous catalytic PET deconstruction

• Scope: Utilize operando scattering to follow the reaction kinetics, disentangle solvent effects, temperature, and catalyst on the evolution of the substrate

• Output: Reduced process intensity, optimized catalyst loading, increased selectivity to desired products, increased reactivity

G Yadav, A Singh et al. in preparation; S Afzal, A Singh et al. in preparation, A Singh et al. in review

• Start of reaction only substrate present• After 20 minutes the substrate recrystallizes• After 40 minutes product crystallizes

18

• C-C bond cleavage via alkane hydrogenolysis• C-C bond cleavage via tandem chemistries• Electrochemical oxidative C-C bond cleavage• Enzymatic polymer deconstruction via two-enzyme systems• Rapid assays for polyesterases• HTP assays for enzymatic polyester deconstruction

Deconstruction

1919

Deconstruction scope

• Enzymatic deconstruction via two-enzyme systems• Rapid assays for polyesterases• HTP assays for enzymatic polyester deconstruction

• C-C bond cleavage via alkane hydrogenolysis• C-C bond cleavage via tandem chemistries

• Electrochemical oxidative C-C bond cleavage

2020

C-C bond cleavage for plastics deconstruction

C-C bond cleavage is among the most important areas in deconstruction R&D that will require new catalysis innovation

2121

Alkane hydrogenolysis of PE

JE Rorrer, GT Beckham, Y Román-Leshkov, JACS Au 2021

5 wt% Ru/C effective for depolymerization of PE to liquid n-alkanes• Demonstrates potential for alkane hydrogenolysis over supported metal catalysts• No solvent needed – catalysis conducted in the melt phase• Key upcycling challenge/future work is valorization of alkane products

2222

Post-consumer LDPE and PP hydrogenolysis

5 wt% Ru/C is also effective for depolymerization of LDPE and PP to liquid alkanes• Ongoing work examining PS, PET, and other materials, including mixtures• Ongoing work with Analysis team to understand the potential of alkane hydrogenolysis

JE Rorrer et al. in preparation

2323

Olefin-intermediate processes for C-C cleavage

LD Ellis et al., ACS SusChemEng 2021Baseline activities demonstrate potential for the olefin-intermediate process

• Ongoing work focused on upcycling of reaction products through additional chemistries and alternative solvents• Additional ongoing work with the analysis team to understand the potential of olefin-intermediate processes

Olefin-intermediate processes offer multiple pathways for polyolefin deconstruction and upcycling

LD Ellis et al., Nature Catalysis, in revision

2424

Electrochemical oxidative C-C bond cleavage

Goal: Develop a redox mediator system to oxidatively cleave C-C bonds at room temperature

Outcome:• Mediated oxidation reduces the driving force (oxidation

potential) by 1.26 V• Enabled C-C bond cleavage for model compounds (bibenzyl, 1,3-

diphenylpropane, 1,4-diphenylbutane, and their derivatives)4.8%Mass yield = 7.5%

Polystyrene (10,000 Da) can be completely deconstructedBase

Base-H

N

O

O

OH

NHPI

N

O

O

O

PINO

e

2525

Additional efforts

Ongoing and future work in chemo-catalytic Deconstruction

Substrate Scope

LDPEHDPE

PET

PS

Substrate Scope

• Effect of common additives on Ru-catalyzed hydrogenolysis

Additive Study

Analysis• What are realistic

selectivity/activity/ yield targets?

C-C Cleavage Thermal Catalysis

Mixed Streams

Electrochemical C-C Bond Cleavage

• Expand polymer substrates• Stable mediators for e-chem • Upcycling products into bio-

compatible feeds or directly to high-value products

• Characterization of PS products• Decomposition mechanism of PINO• Spectroscopy e.g. in situ EPR, UV-vis

Characterization

• Photocatalytic and thermal catalytic deconstruction of polyolefins via homogeneous catalysis

• Organocatalysis for C-O and C-N linked plastics (polyesters, polyamides, etc.)

• Expansion to other substrates guided by analysis efforts

2626

Enzymatic PET deconstruction

1. Yoshida et al. Science 20162. Knott, Erickson, Allen, Gado et al. PNAS 2020

Goal: Understand multi-component enzyme systems for polyester deconstruction and engineer enzymes for accelerated PET deconstructionScope: Ideonella sakaiensis PETase and MHETase enzymes1

Outcome: 6-fold higher activity when linking enzymes with tandem depolymerization functions2

2727

Process concept for identification of diverse PET hydrolases

• Goal: Use known PET hydrolases to build a predictive model and explore natural diversity to identify additional candidates

• Method: Predict protein thermal stability using a machine learning strategy

• Ongoing: Identified thermotolerant candidates show a wide sequence diversity – previously reported PETases are only found in 2 of the clades

• Ongoing: Assay 74 candidates for activity on PET

TOMER algorithm from Gado, Beckham, Payne J. Chem. Inform. Model. 2020

Previously Described

Activity on PET

Observed

Y

Y

Y

Y Y

Y Y

Y

2828

Developing rapid assays for polyesterases

38 enzymes: 1 day reaction with BHET 4 groups

Lusty Beech et al. in preparation for Green Chem.

• Goal: Develop flexible kinetic assay for binning candidate biocatalysts

• Method: Solution-phase, colorimetric, hydrolysis assay. Suitable for range of enzyme purities, substrates, and test conditions

• Outcome: A standardized enzyme assay with broad utility for polyesterase field – deploying to candidate PET hydrolases now

2929

High throughput screening for polymer degradation

• Goal: Develop ultra-high throughput approaches for generating and screening mutant libraries• Method #1: Custom biosensors used for rapid isolation of enzymes with increase degradation activity• Outcome: Whole cell screening assays using fluorescent reporters permits a “one-tube” analysis of

thousands (10s-100s) of enzyme variants in one experiment.

3030

High throughput screening for polymer degradation

Mutant library

In vivo screening for improved expression, solubility, & activity

• Method #2: Use mutagenesis and directed evolution approaches to increase expression and solubility, as well as enzymatic activity

• Outcome: Suite of ultra-high throughput assays to accelerate identification of improved enzyme variants

Enzyme characterization

DNA shuffling

PETase (A) PETase (B)

• Ongoing: PETase and then move to enzymes for other polymers – Can also further improve thermostability

3131

Enzyme screening & characterization

Ongoing and future work in biocatalytic Deconstruction

Model Substrates

PA

PETComputation

• Imaging/microscopy for surface studies and interfacial catalysis

• Structural analyses: • X-ray crystallography• Cryo-EM• SAXS

Advanced CharacterizationRealistic Substrates

• PET powder• BHET

Substrate choice Enzyme identification & engineering

• Machine learning based algorithms for identifying new, naturally occurring, thermotolerantdeconstruction enzymes

• Computational protein engineering (ROSETTA) for creating libraries of enzyme variants

• Activity on highly crystalline polymers

• Stability (shelf-life), temperature tolerance, and solvent tolerance

• Tolerance to additives, dyes, and contaminants

Performance Improvement Targets

• Films• Textiles: clothing, carpets, fibers• Foams, insulation• Mixed streams

High throughput screening• HT (100s) to ultra-HT (1000s+)

methods for screening activity of natural enzymes & mutant libraries

• New biosensors for degradation products of interest across polymers

• Transition to high-temperature assays

• Nylon 6

PU• Flexible

Foams

32

• Biological PET upcycling• Identification of new metabolic pathways for plastics upcycling• Consolidated Bioprocessing of PET

Upcycling

3333

Upcycling Scope

Three complementary upcycling scopes:• Pathway discovery integrates with Deconstruction and allows us to identify novel metabolic pathways for

microbial consumption of plastic deconstruction products• Metabolic engineering allows us to biologically synthesize monomers for “recyclable-by-design” polymers • Chemical upcycling provides a complement to biological routes by targeting applications directly

Conversion of incumbent plastics Production of new building blocks and products

Metabolic pathways Bioproduction Chemical Upcycling

Cat.

3434

Biological PET upcyclingGoal: Enable PET upcycling to β-ketoadipate, a precursor to a performance-advantaged nylon-6,61

Method: Metabolically engineer Pseudomonas putida for:1) Catabolism of the BHET, the PET monomer released by

chemocatalytic glycolysis2) Bioconversion of depolymerized PET to β-ketoadipate

1. CW Johnson et al. Joule 20192. AZ Werner et al., in review 2021

Outcome 1: TPA catabolism by engineered P. putida Outcome 2: BHET catabolism by engineered P. putida

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

0 12 24 36 48

base P. putida strain (RC026)

BHET engineered (RC038)

Gro

wth

(Abs

420-

480)

Time (h)

terephthalic acid (TPA)

TpaKRHA1TphAE6

TphBE6

growth

bis(2-hydroxyethyl)TPA (BHET)

PETaseIs

MHETaseIsTPA

growth0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

0 6 12 18

Gro

wth

(Abs

420-

480)

Time (h)

10 mM BHET10 mM TPA

wild-type P. putida

TPA engineered (TDM461)

3535

Tandem chemical and biological PET upcycling

31.5

05101520253035

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Time (h)

βKA

(g/L

)

Grow

th (OD

600 )

Inst

anta

neou

s BH

ET fe

ed (g

)

Cum

ulative BH

ET (g/L)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

0 24 48 72 96

0

2

4

6

8

10

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

0 12 24 36 48

BHET MHETTPA BKAOD

Time (h)

Anal

ytes

(mM

) Grow

th (OD

600 )

Future work: improve titer, rate, yield (TRY) and interface between deconstruction & bio-upcycling

AZ Werner et al., in review 2021

Outcome 3: Production of 15.1 g/L βKA from BHET at 76% (mol/mol) and 0.16 g/L/h

Outcome 4: Proof-of-concept demonstration of βKA production from crude PET glycolysis product

BHET

TPA

β-ketoadipate(βKA)

PET

BHET

β-ketoadipate (βKA)

Chemocatalytic glycolysis

PETaseIsMHETaseIsTpaKRHA1TphAE6TphBE6PcaHG PcaDPcaC PcaB

growth∆pcaIJ

∆pcaIJ

growth

3636

Discovery of metabolic pathways for deconstruction products

CHDCCHDM

PET co-monomers1

• Goal: Identify novel isolates that grow on plastic deconstruction products (for example IPA, CHDM, and CHDC) and elucidate corresponding metabolic pathways

• Methods: Systems biology to identify the responsible genes and pathways• Ongoing: Discovery of the suite of genes needed for growth on target substrate• Future work: Move pathways into P. putida to “expand the funnel” of substrates

that can be consumed for conversion of commercial PET, other plastics

SB Johnny

Environmental sourcesSystems biology for pathway discovery

Isophthalate (IPA)

Engineer P. putida

Enrichment Isolation

Genome sequencing

3737

PET-CBP: Deconstruction and bioconversion near the Tg

• Goal: Develop high temperature bioconversion approaches for consolidated deconstruction and bioconversion of PET near the Tg , where enzymatic PET deconstruction greatly improves

• Methods: Isolating organisms and pathways that function at higher temperatures

• Outcome #1: Isolated organisms that grows on EG at 65˚C and sequenced corresponding genomes

• Outcome #2: Isolated organism that grow on TPA at 55˚C and identified corresponding pathway genes

• Future directions: Develop genetic tools for thermophilic EG-degrader and engineer it for consolidated bioprocessing (CBP) of PET

3838

Ongoing and future work in Upcycling

P. putida

LDPEHDPE

PET

PS

Monomers

• Engineered organisms for simultaneous deconstruction and upcycling

High temperature

Expanded substrate bioconversion

Mixed Streams

New products

• Making building blocks for the next generation of “recyclable-by-design” polymers

• Focus on enhancing titer, rate, yield

• Functional oligomers for block copolymer applications (e.g., telechelics)

• Use of glycolysis products in high value applications (e.g., FRPs, PUs, etc.)

Oligomers

Biosensors

• Enhanced tools can accelerate bioengineering efforts

• Metabolic engineering for conversion of mixed, deconstructed feedstocks

Chemical upcycling

• PET to 3D Printing Resin• Aminolysis of polyesters to polymer

additives• Oxidative processes to yield long

chain carboxylates for polyamide/polyester applications

Multiple Products

39

• Prediction of recyclable-by-design polymers• Designer PHAs• Acrylic plastics• Crystalline, high-performance RBD circular polymers• HCT/LCT hybrid polymers

Redesign and Modeling

4040

Redesign Scope – Recyclable-by-Design (RBD) Circular Polymers (CPs)

• RBD-CP project goalThe Redesign task will create tomorrow’s plastics to be RBD, economically viable, energy efficient, and derived from bio-based sources and today’s plastics, and processes to recycle redesigned materials.

• Scopes of RBD-CPs• Expanding training database to improve domain of validity for RBD-CPs and develop new polymer chemistries

and structures for RBD-CPs and their performance

• Designer high-performance biodegradable polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs)

• Crystalline high-performance RBD-CPs with intrinsic crystallinity and chemical recyclability

• Acrylic bioplastics with low ceiling temperature (LCT)-enabled chemical recyclability

• HCT/LCT hybrid monomer design for CPs that can unify conflicting properties

• ApproachesEstablishing CP design principles and high-throughput computational pipelines for selecting RBD monomer structures, identifying polymerization conditions, and predicting polymer properties.

4141

Predicting RBD polymersOverall goal:• Deliver a computational pipeline to predict RBD polymers with target

thermal and mechanical properties Specific goals:• Build a library of millions of accessible bio/waste plastics-derived

monomers • Apply cheminformatics to build polymers in silico• Use DFT to predict ceiling temperature (Tc)• Use PolyML to predict mechanical and thermal propertiesImpact:• Narrow design space from 106 potential polymers that we could

make to 101 polymers that we should make

Screening of monomers

Generation of monomers

4242

PolyML for materials design

Overall goal:Use high throughput ML methods to down select material candidates based on predicted performance

Specific goals:• High fidelity structural generation• End-to-end learning (graph neural nets)

Impact:

• Explore vast material design space and avoid inefficient Edisonian approach

Prediction Rate 102 predictions s-1

Properties Tg, TM, ρ, E, PM-O2, PM-N2,PM-CO2,PM-H2O

Polymer Classes Olefins, Acrylates, Esters, Amides, Carbonates, Imides

4343

PolyML+BOTTLE

Goal:

• Expansion of polyML for RBD polymers

Scope:

• Training database to be expanded to improve domain of validity for RBD polymers

• New polymer chemistries (e.g., vitrimerlinkages) and structures (e.g., tacticity) for RBD and performance

Future directions:

• HTP prediction, screening, and feedback between experiment and computation with incorporation of pathway generation tools

4444

Designer PHAs: platform for HP biodegradable polymers

X Tang, et al. Science 2019

Solutions

• Natural polymers (>150 structures) by bacteria or other microbes• Biorenewable carbon and energy storage material• The best end-of-life option for biodegradable plastics

Features

• Current biosynthesis: slow kinetic, low volume, high cost• Poor mechanical properties (R = Me, P3HB, 3% elongation)• PHA copolymers with enhanced ductility but diminished crystallinity

Problems

• Catalyzed chemical synthesis: chemocatalytic pathway for speed, scale, & efficiency• Precision synthesis to access novel PHA microstructures inaccessible by bacteria• Microstructure-rendered high-performance PHAs to replace non-degradable PE and it-PP

X Tang, et al. Nat. Commun. 2018 X Tang, et al. Angew. Chem. 2020

4545

Chemo/biocatalytic pathway to circular PHAs

ChemicalBiological• Synthesized within a bacterial

cell for carbon & energy storage(step-growth mechanism)

• Perfectly isotactic • Linear

• Polymer properties tuned by choice of feed & metabolic

engineering

• Copolymers are random/statistical

• Feeds include sugars, fatty acids, various waste streams

BiodegradableBiocompatible

Tunable

• Synthesized by catalyzed, scalable, and rapid ring-opening polymerization

(chain-growth mechanism)

• Unnatural tacticities and side chains available

• Linear, cyclic, star architectures

• Polymer properties tuned by choice of monomers and

catalysts

• Copolymers can be random, gradient, or blocks

Multi-institutional & multi-pronged Approaches:Retrosynthetic computational tools (NREL, NWU)Metabolic engineering (NREL, ORNL)Chemical catalysis (CSU, MIT)

Biologically sequestered PHAs from waste plastics are to be transformed into building blocks for high-performance designer PHAs with catalysis-enabled chemical circularity

Impact:

4646

Recyclability: petroleum vs bio-based acrylic plastics

R Gilsdorf, et al. Polym. Chem. 2020

• Petroleum PMMA: Tg ~110°C, Td ~300°C, solvent non-resistant, limited monomer recovery in recycling due to fragmentation side reactions

• Bio-based PMMBL: superior thermal properties and solvent resistance (Tg ~225°C, Td ~400°C) and better recyclability with pure monomer recovery

Bio-based vinyl lactone units impart not only performance-advantaged properties but also enhanced chemical recyclability!

53% yield (impure)76% yield (pure)

Impact:

4747

Crystalline high-performance RBD-CPs

• RBD-CPs can be designed to defy the three common types of property tradeoffs• Circular PBTL exhibits intrinsic crystallinity and an unusual set of desired high-performance properties,

as a promising alternative to PET and it-PP

Tradeoffs challenge the design of CPs with high chemical recyclability and high-performance properties:• Depolymerizability–performance• Crystallinity–ductility• Stereo-disorder–crystallinity

Impact:

C Shi, et al. Sci. Adv. 2020

Problems

Solutions • A bridged [2.2.1] bicyclic thioester ring for high polymerizability and selectivity for monomer recovery, as well as high-performance properties and tacticity-independent crystallinity

4848

HCT/LCT hybrid monomer design

Impact:

• HCT polymers exhibit high-performance properties but are difficult to chemically recycle • LCT polymers are readily recyclable but lack robust performance properties• These contrasting properties are conflicting in a single monomer structure

Problems

Solutions • Structural hybridization between HCT and LCT parent monomers into a hybrid structure containing both sub-structural units to achieve both high de/polymerizability and performance properties

• A powerful approach for RBD-CPs where conflicting properties must be exploited and unified• Radically altering properties of the resulting RBD-CP polymers• Overcoming traditional polymers’ structure/property tradeoffs• As a promising alternative to PET, PC, and it-PP

C Shi, et al. in review 2021

4949

Closed-loop upcycling

Ongoing and future work in Modeling and Redesign

Monomer and polymer discovery

Redesign Modeling for RBD

Deconstruction modeling

• Chemical circularity for designer PHAs through integrated chemo-and biocatalytic processes

• Closing the upcycling loop via integration of upcycling of mixed waste plastics, coupled with biological funneling, into the circular designer PHA scheme consisting of (monomer) capture – redesign – recycle

• Expand pool of starting molecules and chemistries

• Tc calibration• Expansion of property

domain of PolyML

• Expand kMC framework for condensation polymers

• Couple intrinsic kinetics with phase behavior and transport

RBD-CPs

Designer PHAs

• Monomers derived from bio-based building blocks and waste plastic deconstruction

• RBD acrylic bioplastics• Architecturally complexed

CPs

• High Tg and Td PHA thermoplastics

• PHA thermoplastic elastomers

• Recyclable PHA thermosets

5050

SummaryOverview• BOTTLE focuses on analysis-guided R&D to upcycle today’s

plastics and redesign tomorrow’s plastics

Management• We have a world-class, interdisciplinary, complementary

team with a transparent collaborative approach to manage R&D

Approach• Interdisciplinary team with analysis as our foundation

provides agnostic view of realistic solutions to solving the plastics waste problem

Progress and Outcomes• Made substantial progress across the R&D portfolio with

high-impact publications emerging from seed project• Initiating active collaborations with industry to derisk and

scale BOTTLE technologies to real world problems

5151

Quad Chart

Timeline• Active Project Duration: 10/1/2020 – 9/30/2023• Total Project Duration: 10/1/2019 – 9/30/2023

FY20 Active Project (FY21-23)

DOE Funding

$2,000,000 $30,000,000

Barriers addressed • Ct-D Advanced Bioprocess Development• Ct-J Identification and Evaluation of Potential

Bioproducts• CT-K Developing Methods for Bioproduct Production

Project Goal• Develop selective, scalable processes to deconstruct and

upcycle today’s plastics and thermosets• Redesign tomorrow’s plastics to be recyclable-by-design (RBD)

and derived from bio-based feedstocks

End of Project Milestone• Deconstruction/Upcycling: Deliver 3 catalytic methods to cleave

C-C bonds and upcycle intermediates.• Redesign: Produce 10 new RBD polymers able to be produced

at ≤$2.50/lb over a range of large-volume applications. Demonstrate ≥50% predicted energy savings relative to incumbent materials.

• Analysis: Deliver 10 designs analyses to ensure BOTTLE metrics are achieved.

• Modeling: Deliver a computational pipeline to predict RBD polymers with target thermal and mechanical properties.

• Characterization: Publish 3 LAPs for plastics deconstruction products.

Project Partners• ANL, CSU, LANL, MIT, MSU, NREL, NU, ORNL,

SLAC, UoP

Funding MechanismBioenergy Technologies Office FY21 AOP Lab Call (DE-LC-000L079) – 2020

52

www.bottle.org

Thank You

DOE Technology Managers and Fellows:• Melissa Klembara, Kate Peretti, Christopher Oshman, Joe Cresko (AMO)• Jay Fitzgerald, Nichole Fitzgerald, Gayle Bentley, Joel Sarapas (BETO)

5353

ContributorsNREL: Gregg BeckhamShaik Afzal, Bob Allen, Bob Baldwin, Brenna Black, David Brandner, Felicia Bratti, Richard Brizendine, Megan Browning, Bonnie Buss, Jeremy Bussard, Birdie Carpenter, Kathy Cisar, Nick Cleveland, Jason DesVeaux, Rebecca DiPucchio, Bryon Donohoe, Meredith Doyle, Lucas Ellis, Erika Erickson, McKenzie Hawkins, Japheth Gado, Kelsey Kinley, Mike Konev, Megan Krysiak, Patrick Lamers, Joel Miscall, Ana Morais, Scott Nicholson, Eric Payne, Michelle Reed, Nic Rorrer, Ron Schoon, Avantika Singh, Morgan Skala, Kevin Sullivan, Chen Wang, Allison Werner, Nolan Wilson, Geetanjali Yadav

ANL: Meltem Urgun-DemirtasCristina Negri, Konstantin Preradovic, Sean Riggio

LANL: Taraka DaleShounak Banerjee, Ramesh Jha, Hau Nguyen, Sang-Min Shin

ORNL: Adam GussJim Elkins, Rich Giannone, Bob Hettich, Jay Huenemann, Ikenna Okekeogbu, Darren Parker, Jessie Tweedie

SLAC: Chris TassoneSimon Bare, Amani Ebrahim, Sarah Hesse, Riti Sarangi

CSU: Eugene ChenRobin Cywar, Reid Gilsdorf, Celine Parker, Yaman Peksenar, Ethan Quinn, Ravikumar Ramegowda, Eswara Rao, Liam Reilly, Changxia Shi, Andrea Westlie

MIT: Yuriy Román-LeshkovGriffin Drake, Ydna Questell, Julie Rorrer, Clara Troyano-Valls, Bing Yan

MSU: Jen DuBoisRita Clancy-Pfister, Jessica Lusty Beech, Dongjin Kim, Will Kincannon, Monica Sanchez

Northwestern University: Linda BroadbeltSri Bala Gorungantu, Shai Phani Kumar Vangala

University of Portsmouth: John McGeehanVictoria Bemmer, Anastasia Callaghan, Simon Cragg, Rory Miles, Andy Pickford, Joy Watts

5454

CollaboratorsAmcor: Kevin Nelson

Arkema: Dana Swan

Axiom: Johnny Lincoln

BASF: Jacob Brutman, Arunabha Kundu, Samantha Gee

Composites Automation: Roger Crane

Jülich: Nick Wierckx

NIST: Kathryn Beers, Sara Orski

Pyran: Kevin Barnett

StoraEnso: Gary Diamond

UCSD: Adam Feist

University of Georgia: Jason Locklin

University of Wisconsin-Madison: George Huber, Shannon Stahl, Victor Zavala

University of Minnesota: Paul Dauenhauer, Mark Hillmyer, Chris Ellison

University of Delaware: Joseph Deitzel

University of Kentucky: Christina Payne

University of Oklahoma: John Klier, Brian Grady

5555

Additional Slides

5656

Publications

In preparation

Avantika Singh, Nicholas A. Rorrer, Scott R. Nicholson, Erika Erickson, Jason DesVeaux, Andre F.T. Avelino, Patrick Lamers, Arpit Bhatt, Yimin Zhang, Chao Wu, Greg Avery, Ling Tao, Andrew R. Pickford, John E. McGeehan, Alberta C. Carpenter, Gregg T. Beckham, Analysis of the enzymatic recycling of poly(ethylene terephthalate), in preparation.

Allison Z. Werner, Rita Clare, Thom Mand, Isabel Pardo, Kelsey J. Ramirez, Christopher W. Johnson, Nicholas A. Rorrer, Davinia Salvachúa, Adam M. Guss, Gregg T. Beckham, Tandem chemical deconstruction and biological upcycling of poly(ethylene terephthalate) to b-ketoadipic acid by Pseudomonas putida KT2440, in preparation.

In review or revision

Benjamin C. Pollard, Brandon C. Knott, Heather B. Mayes, Tucker Burgin, Michael F. Crowley, John E. McGeehan, Gregg T. Beckham, H. Lee Woodcock, The reaction mechanism of the PETase enzyme, in revision at Nature Comm.

Lucas D. Ellis‡, Nicholas A. Rorrer‡, Kevin P. Sullivan‡, Maike Otto, John E. McGeehan, Yuriy Román-Leshkov, Nick Wierckx, Gregg T. Beckham, Chemical and biological catalysis for plastics upcycling, in revision at Nature Catalysis.

Robin M. Cywar, Nicholas A. Rorrer, Caroline Hoyt, Gregg T. Beckham, Eugene E.Y.-X. Chen. Bio-based Polymers with Performance-advantaged Properties. In revision at Nat. Rev. Mater.

Shi, C.; McGraw, M. L.; Li, Z.-C.; Cavallo, L.; Falivene, L.; Chen, E. Y.-X., Hybrid Monomer Design for Unifying Conflicting Polymerizability/Recyclability/Performance Properties. Chem 2021, in review.

In press

Lucas D. Ellis, Sara V. Orski, Andrew G. Norman, Kathryn L. Beers, Yuriy Román-Leshkov*, and Gregg T. Eugene Kuatsjah, Anson C. K. Chan, RuiKatahira, Gregg T. Beckham, Michael E. P. Murphy, and Lindsay D. Eltis*, Elucidating the repertoire of lignostilbene dioxygenases of Sphingomonassp. SYK-6 and their role in the catabolism of lignin-derived aromatic compounds, in revision at J. Biol. Chem, in press at ACS SusChemEng.

5757

Publications

2021

Lucas D. Ellis, Sara V. Orski, G.A. Kenlaw, Andrew G. Norman, Kathryn L. Beers, Yuriy Román-Leshkov, Gregg T. Beckham. Tandem heterogeneous catalysis for polyethylene depolymerization via an olefin intermediate process. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering (2021). 9, 2, 623–628

Julie E. Rorrer, Gregg T. Beckham, Yuriy Román-Leshkov, Conversion of polyolefin waste to liquid alkanes with Ru-based catalysts under mild conditions, JACS Au. (2021) 1, 8-12.

Scott R. Nicholson, Nicholas A. Rorrer, Alberta C. Carpenter, Gregg T. Beckham, Manufacturing energy and greenhouse gas emissions associated with plastics consumption, Joule (2021).

2020

Brandon C. Knott‡, Erika Erickson‡, Mark D. Allen‡, Japheth E. Gado‡, Rosie Graham, Fiona L. Kearns, Isabel Pardo, Ece Topuzlu, Jared J. Anderson, Harry P. Austin, Graham Dominick, Christopher W. Johnson, Nicholas A. Rorrer, Caralyn J. Szostkiewicz, Valérie Copié, Christina M. Payne, H. Lee Woodcock, Bryon S. Donohoe, Gregg T. Beckham, John E. McGeehan, Characterization and engineering of a two-enzyme system for plastics depolymerization, PNAS (2020), 117, 25476-25485.

Gilsdorf, R. A.; Nicki, M. A.; Chen, E. Y.-X. High Chemical Recyclability of Vinyl Lactone Acrylic Bioplastics, Polym. Chem. (2020). 11, 4942-4950.

C. Shi, M. L. McGraw, Z.-C. Li, L. Cavallo, L. Falivene and E. Y.-X. Chen, “High-Performance Pan-Tactic Polythioesters with Intrinsic Crystallinity and Chemical Recyclability”. Sci. Adv. (2020) eabc0495.

Japheth E. Gado, Gregg T. Beckham, Christina M. Payne, Improving enzyme optimum temperature prediction with resampling strategies and ensemble learning, J. Chem. Inform. Model. (2020), 60, 4098-4107.

5858

Patents and patent applications

• Bio-derived Epoxy-Anhydride Thermoset Polymers for Wind Turbine Blades and Anti-Static Coatings: 20-59, U.S. provisional patent application 63/087,547

• PET upcycled to 3D printing materials: 20-37, U.S. provisional patent application 63/050,912

• Universal reactive additives for biodegradable olefinic polymers: 20-77, Forthcoming

• PETase/MHETase enzyme chimera: 20-86, U.S. provisional patent application 63/022,784

• Upcycling mixed waste plastic through chemical depolymerization and biological funneling: 20-123, U.S. provisional patent application 63/126,153

• Catalysts and methods for depolymerizing plastics: 20-22,U.S. provisional patent application 63/050,209

5959

Presentations

2020Understanding the Origin of Long-Chain Alkane Hydrogenolysis Selectivity for the Chemical Upcycling of Waste Polyolefins, 2020 American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) National Conference, Session: Catalytic Upcycling of Waste Plastics, Catalysis and Reaction Engineering Division, Monday, Nov. 16th, 2020.

A heterogeneous system for alkane rearrangement: A means to depolymerize polyethylene at low temperature (< 200°C). Oral Presentation. Catalytic Upgrading of Waste Plastics Session, American Institute of Chemical Engineering Annual Meeting, November 11, 2020.Towards sustainable performance-advantaged bioproducts and plastics upcycling, Michigan Technological University (via webinar), November 6th, 2020Efforts towards selective and sustainable plastics upcycling, Trash-Free Seas Alliance and ReSource Annual Meeting, Sponsored by the World Wildlife Fund and The Ocean Conservancy (via webinar), October 20th, 2020.Tackling the Waste Plastics Problem – Plastics Supply-Chain Modeling and Chemical Catalysis Efforts in the BOTTLE Consortium. Invited Oral Presentation. Global Symposium onWaste Plastics, October 14, 2020.Efforts towards sustainable performance-advantaged bioproducts and plastics upcycling, Materials Life-Cycle Management Mini-Symposium, University of Delaware (via webinar), October 1st, 2020 Bacterial aromatic catabolism for lignin and plastics conversion, BioDiscovery Institute, University of North Texas (via webinar), August 20th, 2020 Computational Investigation of the PETase Reaction Mechanism. ACS Fall 2020 Virtual Meeting & Expo, Virtual Poster, August 17th-20th, 2020.Tackling the Waste Plastics Problem – Plastics Supply-Chain Modeling and Chemical Catalysis Efforts in the Bottle Consortium. International Congress on Sustainability & Engineering. August 4th, 2020Computational Investigation of the PETase Reaction Mechanism. NIH LCB Seminar Series, Virtual Seminar, July 23rd, 2020.Challenges and opportunities in plastics upcycling: Highlights from the BOTTLE Consortium, MIT Plastics and the Environment Program workshop (via webinar), June 18th, 2020Challenges and opportunities in sustainable packaging, Sustainable Packaging Coalition (via webinar), May 26th, 2020

Upcycling waste polyesters to performance thermoplastics and thermosets. 24th Annual Green Chemistry & Engineering Conference, virtual, May 29th, 2020.

Bio-derived Carboxylic Acid. Radtech UV+EB conference 2020, March 2020, Orlando, FL.

Biological processes for lignin and plastics conversion, University fo California Riverside (via webinar), January 7th, 2020

6060

Presentations

2018-2019Introduction to the BOTTLE consortium, DOE AMO-BETO Plastics for a Circular Economy Workshop, December 11th, 2019Using selective chemical and biological catalysis to upcycle lignin and plastics, ExxonMobil Research and Engineering, October 25th, 2019Challenges and opportunities in upcycling and redesigning plastics, ISMR 2019, October 9th, 2019Challenges and opportunities in plastics upcycling: the role of biological and chemical recycling, Sustainable Packaging Coalition Advance 2019, October 8th, 2019Biological recycling and upcycling, Mars Technology Committee Meeting, October 2nd, 2019Enzymes for lignin and plastics conversion, Enzymes, Coenzymes and Metabolic Pathways, July 23rd, 2019New approaches to manufacture and recycle plastics, University of Wisconsin Madison, May 13th, 2019Hybrid biological and catalytic processes to manufacture and recycle plastics, Boise State University, March 27th, 2019Interfacial biocatalysis to break down plants and plastics, Colorado State University, February 15th, 2019Challenges and opportunities in plastics upcycling, 2019 Polymer Upcycling Workshop, UCSB, January 24th, 2019 Hybrid biological and catalytic processes to manufacture and recycle plastics, USC, January 14th, 2019Hybrid biological and catalytic processes to manufacture and recycle plastics, Princeton University, November 28th, 2018Opportunities and challenges in plastics upcycling, ABLC Global, November 8th, 2018

6161

Awards

Top 100 Altmetric paper 2020 (#39) https://www.altmetric.com/details/91362881

https://www.altmetric.com/details/91362881

6262

Consortium value

Why choose a consortium model?• The dire global plastics pollution problem will not be solved

by one institution

• The world needs many minds working together to enable the plastics circular economy

• Using an integrated science approach and analysis-guided research, we have built a diverse team of leading experts at world-class facilities to solve problems faster

• BOTTLE partners have an inventory of innovations that can inform the design of industry-specific collaborative projects with the highest probability of producing novel IP and provides access to chemists, biologists, material and environmental scientists, and engineers able to tackle a variety of problems