26
The independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark study of the journals that cardiologists consider essential to their practice. Consistent with past studies, these cardiologists draw a clear distinction between the top two essential journals and the rest in their field. In addition, cardiologists spend more time reading essential journals, read them sooner, and value their content more than their secondary journals. Top Ten Essential Journals ___________________________________________________________________ Journal of the American College of Cardiology 87% The New England Journal of Medicine 60 Circulation 23 Journal of the American Medical Association 20 American Journal of Cardiology 10 Annals of Internal Medicine 8 Journal of the Amer. Col. of Card. – INTVCD 8 Journal of the Amer. Soc. of Echocardiography 8 Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine 3 Heart.org 3 Top Five Secondary Journals ___________________________________________________________________ American Journal of Cardiology 27% Journal of the American Medical Association 24 The New England Journal of Medicine 17 Mayo Clinic Proceedings 10 Medical Economics 9 Response rate: 19% or 90 of 479 surveys returned. Cardiologists spend significant time reading essential journals ___________________________________________________________________ AVERAGE TIME SPENT READING EACH ISSUE (MINUTES) ESSENTIAL 30 mins SECONDARY 18 They read essential journals soon after receiving them ___________________________________________________________________ % WHO READ THEIR ISSUES WITHIN THREE DAYS ESSENTIAL 47% SECONDARY 28 They re-read essential journals ___________________________________________________________________ % WHO RE-READ THEIR ISSUES TWO OR MORE TIMES ESSENTIAL 12% SECONDARY 5 They find valuable content in essential journals ___________________________________________________________________ % OF ISSUES OFFERING VALUABLE INFORMATION FOR THEIR WORK ESSENTIAL 48% SECONDARY 30 They are more likely to look at ads in essential journals ___________________________________________________________________ % WHO ARE CERTAIN, VERY LIKELY, OR SOMEWHAT LIKELY TO LOOK AT ADS ESSENTIAL 42% SECONDARY 36 HOW CARDIOLOGISTS USE AND VALUE ESSENTIAL JOURNALS 2015 ESSENTIAL JOURNAL STUDY CARDIOLOGY

C A R D I O L O G YThe independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark ... Journal of the Amer. Col. of Card. – INTVCD 8 Journal of the Amer. Soc. of Echocardiography 8 Cleveland

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: C A R D I O L O G YThe independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark ... Journal of the Amer. Col. of Card. – INTVCD 8 Journal of the Amer. Soc. of Echocardiography 8 Cleveland

The independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark

study of the journals that cardiologists consider essential to their

practice. Consistent with past studies, these cardiologists draw

a clear distinction between the top two essential journals and

the rest in their field. In addition, cardiologists spend more time

reading essential journals, read them sooner, and value their

content more than their secondary journals.

Top Ten Essential Journals ___________________________________________________________________

Journal of the American College of Cardiology 87%The New England Journal of Medicine 60Circulation 23Journal of the American Medical Association 20American Journal of Cardiology 10Annals of Internal Medicine 8Journal of the Amer. Col. of Card. – INTVCD 8Journal of the Amer. Soc. of Echocardiography 8Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine 3Heart.org 3

Top Five Secondary Journals ___________________________________________________________________

American Journal of Cardiology 27%Journal of the American Medical Association 24The New England Journal of Medicine 17Mayo Clinic Proceedings 10Medical Economics 9

Response rate: 19% or 90 of 479 surveys returned.

Cardiologists spend significant time reading essential journals ___________________________________________________________________

AVERAGE TIME SPENT READING EACH ISSUE (MINUTES)

ESSENTIAL 30 minsSECONDARY 18

They read essential journals soon after receiving them___________________________________________________________________

% WHO READ THEIR ISSUES WITHIN THREE DAYS

ESSENTIAL 47% SECONDARY 28

They re-read essential journals ___________________________________________________________________

% WHO RE-READ THEIR ISSUES TWO OR MORE TIMES

ESSENTIAL 12% SECONDARY 5

They find valuable content in essential journals___________________________________________________________________

% OF ISSUES OFFERING VALUABLE INFORMATION FOR THEIR WORK

ESSENTIAL 48% SECONDARY 30

They are more likely to look at ads in essential journals ___________________________________________________________________

% WHO ARE CERTAIN, VERY LIKELY, OR SOMEWHAT LIKELY TO LOOK AT ADS

ESSENTIAL 42% SECONDARY 36

HOW CARDIOLOGISTS USE AND VALUE ESSENTIAL JOURNALS

2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y

C A R D I O L O G Y

Page 2: C A R D I O L O G YThe independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark ... Journal of the Amer. Col. of Card. – INTVCD 8 Journal of the Amer. Soc. of Echocardiography 8 Cleveland

Why cardiologists value essential journals___________________________________________________________________

% WHO AGREE WITH THESE STATEMENTS

The articles influence my clinical decisions.

NEJM 89% JACC 87CIRC 67

The articles report on medical breakthroughs.

NEJM 89% JACC 78CIRC 67

The journal offers a balance of cutting-edge and review articles.

JACC 86% CIRC 76NEJM 72

The journal helps me with emerging clinical challenges.

JACC 68%NEJM 57 CIRC 48

The journal is useful in making therapeutic choices.

JACC 67%NEJM 63 CIRC 57

2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y C A R D I O L O G Y

Methodology___________________________________________________________________

This independent study was delivered to 479 cardiologists selected at random from the Direct Medical Data list. This was an unaided-recall study and did not include names or photographs of journals. The Matalia Group, an independent research organization, conducted the study using accepted research methodology.

To find out more___________________________________________________________________

Chrissy Miller (508) 775-3995; [email protected] Bridgeman (781) 775-1287; [email protected] Ainley (773) 327-5917; [email protected] McGuire (973) 771-8926; [email protected]

... or visit NEJMadsales.org.

CARDIOLOGY____________________________

Surveys delivered 479

Surveys completed 90

Response rate 19%

Page 3: C A R D I O L O G YThe independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark ... Journal of the Amer. Col. of Card. – INTVCD 8 Journal of the Amer. Soc. of Echocardiography 8 Cleveland

HOW ENDOCRINOLOGISTS USE AND VALUE ESSENTIAL JOURNALS

The independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark

study of the journals that endocrinologists consider essential

to their practice. Consistent with past studies, these endocrin-

ologists draw a clear distinction between the top two essential

journals and the rest in their field. In addition, endocrinologists

spend more time reading essential journals, read them sooner,

and value their content more than their secondary journals.

Top Ten Essential Journals ___________________________________________________________________

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 76%The New England Journal of Medicine 57Diabetes Care 26Endocrine Practice 22Annals of Internal Medicine 18Journal of the American Medical Association 18Thyroid 8Endocrine News 7Endocrine Today 7Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine 3

Top Five Secondary Journals ___________________________________________________________________

Journal of the American Medical Association 18%Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine 13Mayo Clinic Proceedings 13Annals of Internal Medicine 12Lancet 12

Response rate: 24% or 75 of 316 surveys returned.

Endocrinologists spend significant time reading essential journals ___________________________________________________________________

AVERAGE TIME SPENT READING EACH ISSUE (MINUTES)

ESSENTIAL 31 minsSECONDARY 22

They read essential journals soon after receiving them___________________________________________________________________

% WHO READ THEIR ISSUES WITHIN THREE DAYS

ESSENTIAL 41% SECONDARY 25

They re-read essential journals ___________________________________________________________________

% WHO RE-READ THEIR ISSUES TWO OR MORE TIMES

ESSENTIAL 17% SECONDARY 5

They find valuable content in essential journals___________________________________________________________________

% OF ISSUES OFFERING VALUABLE INFORMATION FOR THEIR WORK

ESSENTIAL 51% SECONDARY 35

They are more likely to look at ads in essential journals ___________________________________________________________________

% WHO ARE CERTAIN, VERY LIKELY, OR SOMEWHAT LIKELY TO LOOK AT ADS

ESSENTIAL 56% SECONDARY 43

2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y

E N D O C R I N O L O G Y

Page 4: C A R D I O L O G YThe independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark ... Journal of the Amer. Col. of Card. – INTVCD 8 Journal of the Amer. Soc. of Echocardiography 8 Cleveland

2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y E N D O C R I N O L O G Y

Methodology___________________________________________________________________

This independent study was delivered to 316 endocrinolo-gists selected at random from the Direct Medical Data list. This was an unaided-recall study and did not include names or photographs of journals. The Matalia Group, an independent research organiza-tion, conducted the study using accepted research methodology.

To find out more___________________________________________________________________

Chrissy Miller (508) 775-3995; [email protected] Bridgeman (781) 775-1287; [email protected] Ainley (773) 327-5917; [email protected] McGuire (973) 771-8926; [email protected]

... or visit NEJMadsales.org.

ENDOCRINOLOGY____________________________

Surveys delivered 316

Surveys completed 75

Response rate 24%

Why endocrinologists value essential journals___________________________________________________________________

% WHO AGREE WITH THESE STATEMENTS

The articles influence my clinical decisions.

DC 85%JCEM 83 NEJM 63

The articles report on medical breakthroughs.

NEJM 91% JCEM 67DC 50

The journal offers a balance of cutting-edge and review articles.

NEJM 77% JCEM 76DC 70

The journal helps me with emerging clinical challenges.

DC 70% JCEM 60NEJM 51

The journal is useful in making therapeutic choices.

DC 90%JCEM 71NEJM 61

Page 5: C A R D I O L O G YThe independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark ... Journal of the Amer. Col. of Card. – INTVCD 8 Journal of the Amer. Soc. of Echocardiography 8 Cleveland

HOW GASTROENTEROLOGISTS USE AND VALUE ESSENTIAL JOURNALS

The independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark

study of the journals that gastroenterologists consider essential

to their practice. Consistent with past studies, these gastroenter-

ologists draw a clear distinction between the top five essential

journals and the rest in their field. In addition, gastroenterologists

spend more time reading essential journals, read them sooner,

and value their content more than their secondary journals.

Top Ten Essential Journals ___________________________________________________________________

American Journal of Gastroenterology 58%Gastroenterology 54Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 46Clinical Gastroenterology & Hepatology 39The New England Journal of Medicine 37Gastroenterology & Hepatology 12Annals of Internal Medicine 10Hepatology 9Practical Gastroenterology 9Journal of Pediatric Gastro & Nutrition 3

Top Five Secondary Journals ___________________________________________________________________

The New England Journal of Medicine 17%Practical Gastroenterology 17Journal of the American Medical Association 16Annals of Internal Medicine 13Gastroenterology & Hepatology 11

Response rate: 21% or 90 of 424 surveys returned.

Gastroenterologists spend significant time reading essential journals ___________________________________________________________________

AVERAGE TIME SPENT READING EACH ISSUE (MINUTES)

ESSENTIAL 37 minsSECONDARY 17

They read essential journals soon after receiving them___________________________________________________________________

% WHO READ THEIR ISSUES WITHIN THREE DAYS

ESSENTIAL 37% SECONDARY 14

They re-read essential journals ___________________________________________________________________

% WHO RE-READ THEIR ISSUES TWO OR MORE TIMES ESSENTIAL 26% SECONDARY 6

They find valuable content in essential journals___________________________________________________________________

% OF ISSUES OFFERING VALUABLE INFORMATION FOR THEIR WORK

ESSENTIAL 46% SECONDARY 27

They are more likely to look at ads in essential journals ___________________________________________________________________

% WHO ARE CERTAIN, VERY LIKELY, OR SOMEWHAT LIKELY TO LOOK AT ADS

ESSENTIAL 56% SECONDARY 43

2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y

G A S T R O E N T E R O L O G Y

Page 6: C A R D I O L O G YThe independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark ... Journal of the Amer. Col. of Card. – INTVCD 8 Journal of the Amer. Soc. of Echocardiography 8 Cleveland

Why gastroenterologists value essential journals___________________________________________________________________

% WHO AGREE WITH THESE STATEMENTS

The articles influence my clinical decisions.

AJGAST 90%GE 81GAST 71

The articles report on medical breakthroughs.

GAST 69% GE 63 AJGAST 54

The journal offers a balance of cutting-edge and review articles.

AJGAST 92%GAST 78 GE 76The journal helps me with emerging clinical challenges.

AJGAST 67%GE 63GAST 45

The journal is useful in making therapeutic choices.

AJGAST 83%GE 78GAST 57

2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y G A S T R O E N T E R O L O G Y

Methodology___________________________________________________________________

This independent study was delivered to 424 gastroenter-ologists selected at random from the Direct Medical Data list. This was an unaided-recall study and did not include names or photo-graphs of journals. The Matalia Group, an independent research organization, conducted the study using accepted research methodology.

To find out more___________________________________________________________________

Chrissy Miller (508) 775-3995; [email protected] Bridgeman (781) 775-1287; [email protected] Ainley (773) 327-5917; [email protected] McGuire (973) 771-8926; [email protected]

... or visit NEJMadsales.org.

GASTROENTEROLOGY____________________________

Surveys delivered 424

Surveys completed 90

Response rate 21%

Page 7: C A R D I O L O G YThe independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark ... Journal of the Amer. Col. of Card. – INTVCD 8 Journal of the Amer. Soc. of Echocardiography 8 Cleveland

The independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark

study of the journals that hematologists consider essential to

their practice. Consistent with past studies, these hematologists

draw a clear distinction between the top three essential journals

and the rest in their field. In addition, hematologists spend more

time reading essential journals, read them sooner, and value

their content more than their secondary journals.

Top Ten Essential Journals ___________________________________________________________________

Blood 69%Journal of Clinical Oncology 65The New England Journal of Medicine 60Journal of the American Medical Association 11Biology of Bone & Marrow Transplantation 7The ASCO Post 6British Journal of Hematology 6Journal of Thrombosis & Haemostasis 6Lancet Oncology 6Annals of Internal Medicine 4

Top Five Secondary Journals ___________________________________________________________________

The Oncologist 18%The New England Journal of Medicine 17Annals of Internal Medicine 13Journal of the American Medical Association 13Lancet 11

Response rate: 25% or 72 of 283 surveys returned.

HOW HEMATOLOGISTS USE AND VALUE ESSENTIAL JOURNALS

Hematologists spend significant time reading essential journals ___________________________________________________________________

AVERAGE TIME SPENT READING EACH ISSUE (MINUTES)

ESSENTIAL 32 minsSECONDARY 19

They read essential journals soon after receiving them___________________________________________________________________

% WHO READ THEIR ISSUES WITHIN THREE DAYS

ESSENTIAL 45% SECONDARY 34

They re-read essential journals ___________________________________________________________________

% WHO RE-READ THEIR ISSUES TWO OR MORE TIMES

ESSENTIAL 26% SECONDARY 13

They find valuable content in essential journals___________________________________________________________________

% OF ISSUES OFFERING VALUABLE INFORMATION FOR THEIR WORK

ESSENTIAL 46% SECONDARY 30

They are more likely to look at ads in essential journals ___________________________________________________________________

% WHO ARE CERTAIN, VERY LIKELY, OR SOMEWHAT LIKELY TO LOOK AT ADS

ESSENTIAL 36% SECONDARY 14

2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y

H E M A T O L O G Y

Page 8: C A R D I O L O G YThe independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark ... Journal of the Amer. Col. of Card. – INTVCD 8 Journal of the Amer. Soc. of Echocardiography 8 Cleveland

Why hematologists value Essential journals___________________________________________________________________

% WHO AGREE WITH THESE STATEMENTS

The articles influence my clinical decisions.

NEJM 94% BLOOD 90JCO 77

The articles report on medical breakthroughs.

JCO 86%BLOOD 70NEJM 70

The journal offers a balance of cutting-edge and review articles.

BLOOD 80%JCO 77 NEJM 66

The journal helps me with emerging clinical challenges.

BLOOD 44%JCO 40 NEJM 34

The journal is useful in making therapeutic choices.

NEJM 75%BLOOD 70JCO 56

2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y H E M A T O L O G Y

Methodology___________________________________________________________________

This independent study was delivered to 283 hematologists selected at random from the Direct Medical Data list. This was an unaided-recall study and did not include names or photographs of journals. The Matalia Group, an independent research organization, conducted the study using accepted research methodology.

To find out more___________________________________________________________________

Chrissy Miller (508) 775-3995; [email protected] Bridgeman (781) 775-1287; [email protected] Ainley (773) 327-5917; [email protected] McGuire (973) 771-8926; [email protected]

... or visit NEJMadsales.org.

HEMATOLOGY____________________________

Surveys delivered 283

Surveys completed 72

Response rate 25%

Page 9: C A R D I O L O G YThe independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark ... Journal of the Amer. Col. of Card. – INTVCD 8 Journal of the Amer. Soc. of Echocardiography 8 Cleveland

The independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark

study of the journals that hematologist/oncologists consider

essential to their practice. Consistent with past studies, these

hematologist/oncologists draw a clear distinction between the

top three essential journals and the rest in their field. In addition,

hematologist/oncologists spend more time reading essential

journals, read them sooner, and value their content more than

their secondary journals.

Top Ten Essential Journals ___________________________________________________________________

Journal of Clinical Oncology 84%The New England Journal of Medicine 72Blood 47Journal of the American Medical Association 28Jour. of the Natl. Comp. Cancer Network 9Annals of Internal Medicine 5The ASCO Post 5Hemonc Today 6Lancet 5Lancet Oncology 5

Top Five Secondary Journals ___________________________________________________________________

Journal of the American Medical Association 21%Annals of Internal Medicine 11Jour. of the Natl. Comp. Cancer Network 11The Oncologist 11Lancet Oncology 11

Response rate: 23% or 75 of 330 surveys returned.

Hem/oncs spend significant time reading essential journals ___________________________________________________________________

AVERAGE TIME SPENT READING EACH ISSUE (MINUTES)

ESSENTIAL 30 minsSECONDARY 22

They read essential journals soon after receiving them___________________________________________________________________

% WHO READ THEIR ISSUES WITHIN THREE DAYS

ESSENTIAL 40% SECONDARY 30

They re-read essential journals ___________________________________________________________________

% WHO RE-READ THEIR ISSUES TWO OR MORE TIMES

ESSENTIAL 17% SECONDARY 10

They find valuable content in essential journals___________________________________________________________________

% OF ISSUES OFFERING VALUABLE INFORMATION FOR THEIR WORK

ESSENTIAL 47% SECONDARY 34

They are more likely to look at ads in essential journals ___________________________________________________________________

% WHO ARE CERTAIN, VERY LIKELY, OR SOMEWHAT LIKELY TO LOOK AT ADS

ESSENTIAL 45% SECONDARY 47

HOW HEMATOLOGIST/ONCOLOGISTS USE AND VALUE ESSENTIAL JOURNALS

2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y

H E M A T O L O G Y /O N C O L O G Y

Page 10: C A R D I O L O G YThe independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark ... Journal of the Amer. Col. of Card. – INTVCD 8 Journal of the Amer. Soc. of Echocardiography 8 Cleveland

Why hem/oncs value essential journals___________________________________________________________________

% WHO AGREE WITH THESE STATEMENTS

The articles influence my clinical decisions.

JCO 87%BLOOD 80NEJM 74

The articles report on medical breakthroughs.

NEJM 96% JCO 84BLOOD 80

The journal offers a balance of cutting-edge and review articles.

NEJM 82% JCO 70BLOOD 66

The journal helps me with emerging clinical challenges.

JCO 62% BLOOD 60NEJM 57

The journal is useful in making therapeutic choices.

JCO 79% BLOOD 71NEJM 63

2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y H E M A T O L O G Y / O N C O L O G Y

Methodology___________________________________________________________________

This independent study was delivered to 330 hem/oncs selected at random from the Direct Medical Data list. This was an unaided-recall study and did not include names or photographs of journals. The Matalia Group, an independent research organization, conducted the study using accepted research methodology.

To find out more___________________________________________________________________

Chrissy Miller (508) 775-3995; [email protected] Bridgeman (781) 775-1287; [email protected] Ainley (773) 327-5917; [email protected] McGuire (973) 771-8926; [email protected]

... or visit NEJMadsales.org.

HEM/ONC____________________________

Surveys delivered 330

Surveys completed 75

Response rate 23%

Page 11: C A R D I O L O G YThe independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark ... Journal of the Amer. Col. of Card. – INTVCD 8 Journal of the Amer. Soc. of Echocardiography 8 Cleveland

Hospitalists spend significant time reading essential journals ___________________________________________________________________

AVERAGE TIME SPENT READING EACH ISSUE (MINUTES)

ESSENTIAL 31 minsSECONDARY 20

They read essential journals soon after receiving them___________________________________________________________________

% WHO READ THEIR ISSUES WITHIN THREE DAYS

ESSENTIAL 43% SECONDARY 23

They re-read essential journals ___________________________________________________________________

% WHO RE-READ THEIR ISSUES TWO OR MORE TIMES

ESSENTIAL 20% SECONDARY 13

They find valuable content in essential journals___________________________________________________________________

% OF ISSUES OFFERING VALUABLE INFORMATION FOR THEIR WORK

ESSENTIAL 49% SECONDARY 34

They are more likely to look at ads in essential journals ___________________________________________________________________

% WHO ARE CERTAIN, VERY LIKELY, OR SOMEWHAT LIKELY TO LOOK AT ADS

ESSENTIAL 46% SECONDARY 36

HOW HOSPITALISTS USE AND VALUE ESSENTIAL JOURNALS

The independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark

study of the journals that hospitalists consider important

to their practice. Consistent with past studies, these hospitalists

draw a clear distinction between the top three essential journals

and the rest in their field. In addition, hospitalists spend more

time reading essential journals, read them sooner, and value

their content more than their secondary journals.

Top Ten Essential Journals ___________________________________________________________________

The New England Journal of Medicine 51%Annals of Internal Medicine 32Journal of the American Medical Association 30Journal of Hospital Medicine 21Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine 14The Hospitalist 11American Family Physician 8NEJM Journal Watch 7Today’s Hospitalist 7Mayo Clinic Proceedings 6

Top Five Secondary Journals ___________________________________________________________________

Journal of the American Medical Association 20%Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine 10Today’s Hospitalist 10The New England Journal of Medicine 8ACP Hospitalist 6

Response rate: 25% or 95 of 377 surveys returned.

2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y

H O S P I T A L M E D I C I N E

Page 12: C A R D I O L O G YThe independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark ... Journal of the Amer. Col. of Card. – INTVCD 8 Journal of the Amer. Soc. of Echocardiography 8 Cleveland

Why hospitalists value essential journals___________________________________________________________________

% WHO AGREE WITH THESE STATEMENTS

The articles influence my clinical decisions.

ANIM 80% NEJM 77JAMA 75

The articles report on medical breakthroughs.

NEJM 79% JAMA 61ANIM 40

The journal offers a balance of cutting-edge and review articles.

NEJM 75%ANIM 70 JAMA 61

The journal helps me with emerging clinical challenges.

NEJM 73% JAMA 61ANIM 33

The journal is useful in making therapeutic choices.

ANIM 60% NEJM 58JAMA 50

2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y H O S P I T A L M E D I C I N E

Methodology___________________________________________________________________

This independent study was delivered to 377 hospitalists selected at random from the Direct Medical Data list. This was an unaided-recall study and did not include names or photographs of journals. The Matalia Group, an independent research organization, conducted the study using accepted research methodology.

To find out more___________________________________________________________________

Chrissy Miller (508) 775-3995; [email protected] Bridgeman (781) 775-1287; [email protected] Ainley (773) 327-5917; [email protected] McGuire (973) 771-8926; [email protected]

... or visit NEJMadsales.org.

HOSPITAL MEDICINE____________________________

Surveys delivered 377

Surveys completed 95

Response rate 25%

Page 13: C A R D I O L O G YThe independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark ... Journal of the Amer. Col. of Card. – INTVCD 8 Journal of the Amer. Soc. of Echocardiography 8 Cleveland

The independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark

study of the journals that ID specialists consider important

to their practice. Consistent with past studies, these ID

specialists draw a clear distinction between the top three

essential journals and the rest in their field. In addition,

ID specialists spend more time reading essential journals,

them sooner, and value their content more than their

secondary journals.

Top Ten Essential Journals ___________________________________________________________________

The New England Journal of Medicine 75%Clinical Infectious Diseases 74Journal of the American Medical Association 42Journal of Infectious Diseases 29Lancet Infectious Disease 19Annals of Internal Medicine 14Infectious Disease News 9Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 5Lancet 5Consultant 3

Top Five Secondary Journals ___________________________________________________________________

Journal of Infectious Diseases 24%Lancet Infectious Disease 22Journal of the American Medical Association 16Annals of Internal Medicine 15Lancet 11

Response rate: 20% or 92 of 458 surveys returned.

ID specialists spend significant time reading essential journals ___________________________________________________________________

AVERAGE TIME SPENT READING EACH ISSUE (MINUTES)

ESSENTIAL 30 minsSECONDARY 20

They read essential journals soon after receiving them___________________________________________________________________

% WHO READ THEIR ISSUES WITHIN THREE DAYS

ESSENTIAL 39% SECONDARY 21

They re-read essential journals ___________________________________________________________________

% WHO RE-READ THEIR ISSUES TWO OR MORE TIMES

ESSENTIAL 21% SECONDARY 10

They find valuable content in essential journals___________________________________________________________________

% OF ISSUES OFFERING VALUABLE INFORMATION FOR THEIR WORK

ESSENTIAL 49% SECONDARY 33

They are more likely to look at ads in essential journals ___________________________________________________________________

% WHO ARE CERTAIN, VERY LIKELY, OR SOMEWHAT LIKELY TO LOOK AT ADS

ESSENTIAL 40% SECONDARY 30

HOW ID SPECIALISTS USE AND VALUE ESSENTIAL JOURNALS

2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y

I N F E C T I O U SD I S E A S E

Page 14: C A R D I O L O G YThe independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark ... Journal of the Amer. Col. of Card. – INTVCD 8 Journal of the Amer. Soc. of Echocardiography 8 Cleveland

Why ID specialists value essential journals___________________________________________________________________

% WHO AGREE WITH THESE STATEMENTS

The articles influence my clinical decisions.

CID 87% NEJM 71JAMA 54

The articles report on medical breakthroughs.

NEJM 81% JAMA 67CID 62

The journal offers a balance of cutting-edge and review articles.

NEJM 81%CID 75 JAMA 56

The journal helps me with emerging clinical challenges.

CID 81% NEJM 49JAMA 41

The journal is useful in making therapeutic choices.

CID 82% NEJM 59JAMA 49

2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y I N F E C T I O U S D I S E A S E S

Methodology___________________________________________________________________

This independent study was delivered to 458 ID specialists selected at random from the Direct Medical Data list. This was an unaided-recall study and did not include names or photographs of journals. The Matalia Group, an independent research organization, conducted the study using accepted research methodology.

To find out more___________________________________________________________________

Chrissy Miller (508) 775-3995; [email protected] Bridgeman (781) 775-1287; [email protected] Ainley (773) 327-5917; [email protected] McGuire (973) 771-8926; [email protected]

... or visit NEJMadsales.org.

INFECTIOUS DISEASES____________________________

Surveys delivered 458

Surveys completed 92

Response rate 20%

Page 15: C A R D I O L O G YThe independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark ... Journal of the Amer. Col. of Card. – INTVCD 8 Journal of the Amer. Soc. of Echocardiography 8 Cleveland

The independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark

study of the journals that internists consider essential to their

practice. Consistent with past studies, these internists draw a

clear distinction between the top three essential journals and

the rest in their field. In addition, internists spend more time

reading essential journals, read them sooner, and value their

content more than their secondary journals.

Top Ten Essential Journals ___________________________________________________________________

The New England Journal of Medicine 60%Annals of Internal Medicine 44Journal of the American Medical Association 44Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine 13Medical Economics 10Consultant 9American Journal of Medicine 8Internal Medicine News 8Mayo Clinic Proceedings 7American Family Physician 5

Top Five Secondary Journals ___________________________________________________________________

Journal of the American Medical Association 21%Mayo Clinic Proceedings 18Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine 16Internal Medicine News 11Medical Economics 9

Response rate: 21% or 80 of 376 surveys returned.

Internists spend significant time reading essential journals ___________________________________________________________________

AVERAGE TIME SPENT READING EACH ISSUE (MINUTES)

ESSENTIAL 25 minsSECONDARY 15

They read essential journals soon after receiving them___________________________________________________________________

% WHO READ THEIR ISSUES WITHIN THREE DAYS

ESSENTIAL 49% SECONDARY 39

They re-read essential journals ___________________________________________________________________

% WHO RE-READ THEIR ISSUES TWO OR MORE TIMES

ESSENTIAL 23% SECONDARY 12

They find valuable content in essential journals___________________________________________________________________

% OF ISSUES OFFERING VALUABLE INFORMATION FOR THEIR WORK

ESSENTIAL 41% SECONDARY 28

They are more likely to look at ads in essential journals ___________________________________________________________________

% WHO ARE CERTAIN, VERY LIKELY, OR SOMEWHAT LIKELY TO LOOK AT ADS

ESSENTIAL 34% SECONDARY 29

HOW INTERNISTS USE AND VALUE ESSENTIAL JOURNALS

2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y

I N T E R N A L M E D I C I N E

Page 16: C A R D I O L O G YThe independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark ... Journal of the Amer. Col. of Card. – INTVCD 8 Journal of the Amer. Soc. of Echocardiography 8 Cleveland

Why internists value essential journals___________________________________________________________________

% WHO AGREE WITH THESE STATEMENTS

The articles influence my clinical decisions.

ANIM 77%JAMA 71 NEJM 69

The articles report on medical breakthroughs.

NEJM 85%JAMA 54ANIM 51

The journal offers a balance of cutting-edge and review articles.

NEJM 73%ANIM 71 JAMA 69

The journal helps me with emerging clinical challenges.

JAMA 60% NEJM 54ANIM 51

The journal is useful in making therapeutic choices.

ANIM 57% NEJM 50JAMA 49

2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y I N T E R N A L M E D I C I N E

Methodology___________________________________________________________________

This independent study was delivered to 376 internists selected at random from the Direct Medical Data list. This was an unaided-recall study and did not include names or photographs of journals. The Matalia Group, an independent research organization, conducted the study using accepted research methodology.

To find out more___________________________________________________________________

Chrissy Miller (508) 775-3995; [email protected] Bridgeman (781) 775-1287; [email protected] Ainley (773) 327-5917; [email protected] McGuire (973) 771-8926; [email protected]

... or visit NEJMadsales.org.

INTERNAL MEDICINE____________________________

Surveys delivered 376

Surveys completed 80

Response rate 21%

Page 17: C A R D I O L O G YThe independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark ... Journal of the Amer. Col. of Card. – INTVCD 8 Journal of the Amer. Soc. of Echocardiography 8 Cleveland

The independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark

study of the journals that nephrologists consider essential to

their practice. Consistent with past studies, these nephrologists

draw a clear distinction between the top three essential journals

and the rest in their field. In addition, nephrologists spend more

time reading essential journals, read them sooner, and value

their content more than their secondary journals.

Top Ten Essential Journals ___________________________________________________________________

The New England Journal of Medicine 74%Journal of the Amer. Society of Nephrology 50Clinical Journal of the Amer. Soc. of Nephrology 37Journal of the American Medical Association 21American Journal of Kidney Diseases 19Annals of Internal Medicine 13Kidney International 10Nephrology News & Issues 7Seminars in Dialysis 6Journal of the Amer. Society of Hypertension 4

Top Five Secondary Journals ___________________________________________________________________

Annals of Internal Medicine 13%Journal of the American Medical Association 13Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 10American Journal of Kidney Diseases 9The New England Journal of Medicine 9

Response rate: 21% or 68 of 326 surveys returned.

Nephrologists spend significant time reading essential journals ___________________________________________________________________

AVERAGE TIME SPENT READING EACH ISSUE (MINUTES)

ESSENTIAL 28 minsSECONDARY 20

They read essential journals soon after receiving them___________________________________________________________________

% WHO READ THEIR ISSUES WITHIN THREE DAYS

ESSENTIAL 34% SECONDARY 27

They re-read essential journals ___________________________________________________________________

% WHO RE-READ THEIR ISSUES TWO OR MORE TIMES

ESSENTIAL 13% SECONDARY 10

They find valuable content in essential journals___________________________________________________________________

% OF ISSUES OFFERING VALUABLE INFORMATION FOR THEIR WORK

ESSENTIAL 45% SECONDARY 26

They are more likely to look at ads in essential journals ___________________________________________________________________

% WHO ARE CERTAIN, VERY LIKELY, OR SOMEWHAT LIKELY TO LOOK AT ADS

ESSENTIAL 60% SECONDARY 60

HOW NEPHROLOGISTS USE AND VALUE ESSENTIAL JOURNALS

2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y

N E P H R O L O G Y

Page 18: C A R D I O L O G YThe independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark ... Journal of the Amer. Col. of Card. – INTVCD 8 Journal of the Amer. Soc. of Echocardiography 8 Cleveland

Why nephrologists value essential journals___________________________________________________________________

% WHO AGREE WITH THESE STATEMENTS

The articles influence my clinical decisions.

CJASN 80%JASN 77 NEJM 76 The articles report on medical breakthroughs.

NEJM 90%JASN 65 CJASN 56

The journal offers a balance of cutting-edge and review articles.

NEJM 74% CJASN 64JASN 62

The journal helps me with emerging clinical challenges.

NEJM 60%JASN 47 CJASN 40

The journal is useful in making therapeutic choices.

CJASN 72% NEJM 66JASN 56

2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y N E P H R O L O G Y

Methodology___________________________________________________________________

This independent study was delivered to 326 nephrologists selected at random from the Direct Medical Data list. This was an unaided-recall study and did not include names or photographs of journals. The Matalia Group, an independent research organization, conducted the study using accepted research methodology.

To find out more___________________________________________________________________

Chrissy Miller (508) 775-3995; [email protected] Bridgeman (781) 775-1287; [email protected] Ainley (773) 327-5917; [email protected] McGuire (973) 771-8926; [email protected]

... or visit NEJMadsales.org.

NEPHROLOGY____________________________

Surveys delivered 326

Surveys completed 68

Response rate 21%

Page 19: C A R D I O L O G YThe independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark ... Journal of the Amer. Col. of Card. – INTVCD 8 Journal of the Amer. Soc. of Echocardiography 8 Cleveland

The independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark

study of the journals that neurologists consider essential to their

practice. Consistent with past studies, these neurologists draw

a clear distinction between the top two essential journals and

the rest in their field. In addition, neurologists spend more time

reading essential journals, read them sooner, and value their

content more than their secondary journals.

Top Ten Essential Journals ___________________________________________________________________

Neurology 77%The New England Journal of Medicine 31Continuum 17JAMA Neurology 17Annals of Neurology 14Journal of the American Medical Association 10Stroke 9Muscle and Nerve 7Neurology Today 7Epilepsia 5

Top Five Secondary Journals ___________________________________________________________________

Journal of the Amer. Medical Assoc. Neurology 20%The New England Journal of Medicine 11Annals of Nephrology 9Journal of the American Medical Association 7Neurology 7

Response rate: 25% or 80 of 325 surveys returned.

HOW NEUROLOGISTS USE AND VALUE ESSENTIAL JOURNALS

Neurologists spend significant time reading essential journals ___________________________________________________________________

AVERAGE TIME SPENT READING EACH ISSUE (MINUTES)

ESSENTIAL 35 minsSECONDARY 23

They read essential journals soon after receiving them___________________________________________________________________

% WHO READ THEIR ISSUES WITHIN THREE DAYS

ESSENTIAL 42% SECONDARY 30

They re-read essential journals ___________________________________________________________________

% WHO RE-READ THEIR ISSUES TWO OR MORE TIMES

ESSENTIAL 21% SECONDARY 16

They find valuable content in essential journals___________________________________________________________________

% OF ISSUES OFFERING VALUABLE INFORMATION FOR THEIR WORK

ESSENTIAL 51% SECONDARY 34

They are more likely to look at ads in essential journals ___________________________________________________________________

% WHO ARE CERTAIN, VERY LIKELY, OR SOMEWHAT LIKELY TO LOOK AT ADS

ESSENTIAL 59% SECONDARY 56

2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y

N E U R O L O G Y

Page 20: C A R D I O L O G YThe independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark ... Journal of the Amer. Col. of Card. – INTVCD 8 Journal of the Amer. Soc. of Echocardiography 8 Cleveland

Why neurologists value essential journals___________________________________________________________________

% WHO AGREE WITH THESE STATEMENTS

The articles influence my clinical decisions.

NEUR 84%NEJM 80

The articles report on medical breakthroughs.

NEJM 85% NEUR 81

The journal offers a balance of cutting-edge and review articles.

NEJM 80% NEUR 63

The journal helps me with emerging clinical challenges.

NEUR 71%NEJM 52

The journal is useful in making therapeutic choices.

NEUR 69%NEJM 64

2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y N E U R O L O G Y

Methodology___________________________________________________________________

This independent study was delivered to 325 neurologists selected at random from the Direct Medical Data list. This was an unaided-recall study and did not include names or photographs of journals. The Matalia Group, an independent research organization, conducted the study using accepted research methodology.

To find out more___________________________________________________________________

Chrissy Miller (508) 775-3995; [email protected] Bridgeman (781) 775-1287; [email protected] Ainley (773) 327-5917; [email protected] McGuire (973) 771-8926; [email protected]

... or visit NEJMadsales.org.

NEUROLOGY____________________________

Surveys delivered 325

Surveys completed 80

Response rate 25%

Page 21: C A R D I O L O G YThe independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark ... Journal of the Amer. Col. of Card. – INTVCD 8 Journal of the Amer. Soc. of Echocardiography 8 Cleveland

The independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark

study of the journals that oncologists consider essential to their

practice. Consistent with past studies, these oncologists draw

a clear distinction between the top two essential journals and

the rest in their field. In addition, oncologists spend more time

reading essential journals, read them sooner, and value their

content more than their secondary journals.

Top Ten Essential Journals ___________________________________________________________________

Journal of Clinical Oncology 79%The New England Journal of Medicine 64Blood 16Lancet Oncology 16Journal of the American Medical Association 14Lancet 11Seminars in Oncology 9Nature 9Annals of Internal Medicine 6Jour. of the National Comp. Cancer Network 6

Top Five Secondary Journals ___________________________________________________________________

Journal of the American Medical Association 24%The New England Journal of Medicine 16Annals of Internal Medicine 13Lancet Oncology 13Oncology 10

Response rate: 21% or 70 of 327 surveys returned.

HOW ONCOLOGISTS USE AND VALUE ESSENTIAL JOURNALS

Oncologists spend significant time reading essential journals ___________________________________________________________________

AVERAGE TIME SPENT READING EACH ISSUE (MINUTES)

ESSENTIAL 28 minsSECONDARY 16

They read essential journals soon after receiving them___________________________________________________________________

% WHO READ THEIR ISSUES WITHIN THREE DAYS

ESSENTIAL 47% SECONDARY 38

They re-read essential journals ___________________________________________________________________

% WHO RE-READ THEIR ISSUES TWO OR MORE TIMES

ESSENTIAL 17% SECONDARY 8

They find valuable content in essential journals___________________________________________________________________

% OF ISSUES OFFERING VALUABLE INFORMATION FOR THEIR WORK

ESSENTIAL 43% SECONDARY 28

They are more likely to look at ads in essential journals ___________________________________________________________________

% WHO ARE CERTAIN, VERY LIKELY, OR SOMEWHAT LIKELY TO LOOK AT ADS

ESSENTIAL 40% SECONDARY 33

2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y

O N C O L O G Y

Page 22: C A R D I O L O G YThe independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark ... Journal of the Amer. Col. of Card. – INTVCD 8 Journal of the Amer. Soc. of Echocardiography 8 Cleveland

Why oncologists value essential journals___________________________________________________________________

% WHO AGREE WITH THESE STATEMENTS

The articles influence my clinical decisions.

NEJM 93% JCO 86

The articles report on medical breakthroughs.

JCO 86%NEJM 82

The journal offers a balance of cutting-edge and review articles.

JCO 71%NEJM 67

The journal helps me with emerging clinical challenges.

JCO 76%NEJM 73

The journal is useful in making therapeutic choices.

JCO 87%NEJM 76

2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y O N C O L O G Y

Methodology___________________________________________________________________

This independent study was delivered to 327 oncologists selected at random from the Direct Medical Data list. This was an unaided-recall study and did not include names or photographs of journals. The Matalia Group, an independent research organization, conducted the study using accepted research methodology.

To find out more___________________________________________________________________

Chrissy Miller (508) 775-3995; [email protected] Bridgeman (781) 775-1287; [email protected] Ainley (773) 327-5917; [email protected] McGuire (973) 771-8926; [email protected]

... or visit NEJMadsales.org.

ONCOLOGY____________________________

Surveys delivered 327

Surveys completed 70

Response rate 21%

Page 23: C A R D I O L O G YThe independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark ... Journal of the Amer. Col. of Card. – INTVCD 8 Journal of the Amer. Soc. of Echocardiography 8 Cleveland

The independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark

study of the journals that pulmonologists consider essential

to their practice. Consistent with past studies, these pulmon-

ologists draw a clear distinction between the top three essential

journals and the rest in their field. In addition, pulmonologists

spend more time reading essential journals, read them sooner,

and value their content more than their secondary journals.

Top Ten Essential Journals ___________________________________________________________________

Chest 86%The New England Journal of Medicine 63Amer. Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine 42Annals of Internal Medicine 19Sleep 17Critical Care Medicine 15Journal of the American Medical Association 12Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine 8Critical Care 5Journal of the Amer. Medical Association IM 5

Top Five Secondary Journals ___________________________________________________________________

Journal of the American Medical Association 17%The New England Journal of Medicine 16Annals of Internal Medicine 12Amer. Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine 10Mayo Clinic Proceedings 8

Response rate: 23% or 83 of 357 surveys returned.

HOW PULMONOLOGISTS USE AND VALUE ESSENTIAL JOURNALS

Pulmonologists spend significant time reading essential journals ___________________________________________________________________

AVERAGE TIME SPENT READING EACH ISSUE (MINUTES)

ESSENTIAL 33 minsSECONDARY 23

They read essential journals soon after receiving them___________________________________________________________________

% WHO READ THEIR ISSUES WITHIN THREE DAYS

ESSENTIAL 47% SECONDARY 33

They re-read essential journals ___________________________________________________________________

% WHO RE-READ THEIR ISSUES TWO OR MORE TIMES

ESSENTIAL 26% SECONDARY 12

They find valuable content in essential journals___________________________________________________________________

% OF ISSUES OFFERING VALUABLE INFORMATION FOR THEIR WORK

ESSENTIAL 44% SECONDARY 34

They are more likely to look at ads in essential journals ___________________________________________________________________

% WHO ARE CERTAIN, VERY LIKELY, OR SOMEWHAT LIKELY TO LOOK AT ADS

ESSENTIAL 43% SECONDARY 36

2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y

P U L M O N O L O G Y

Page 24: C A R D I O L O G YThe independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark ... Journal of the Amer. Col. of Card. – INTVCD 8 Journal of the Amer. Soc. of Echocardiography 8 Cleveland

Why pulmonologists value essential journals___________________________________________________________________

% WHO AGREE WITH THESE STATEMENTS

The articles influence my clinical decisions.

CHEST 90% AJRCCM 80NEJM 75

The articles report on medical breakthroughs.

NEJM 89% CHEST 59AJRCCM 46

The journal offers a balance of cutting-edge and review articles.

CHEST 78%NEJM 77 AJRCCM 69

The journal helps me with emerging clinical challenges.

CHEST 65%NEJM 58 AJRCCM 54

The journal is useful in making therapeutic choices.

CHEST 80%AJRCCM 69NEJM 62

2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y P U L M O N O L O G Y

Methodology___________________________________________________________________

This independent study was delivered to 357 pulmonolo-gists selected at random from the Direct Medical Data list. This was an unaided-recall study and did not include names or photographs of journals. The Matalia Group, an independent research organization, conducted the study using accepted research methodology.

To find out more___________________________________________________________________

Chrissy Miller (508) 775-3995; [email protected] Bridgeman (781) 775-1287; [email protected] Ainley (773) 327-5917; [email protected] McGuire (973) 771-8926; [email protected]

... or visit NEJMadsales.org.

PULMONOLOGY____________________________

Surveys delivered 357

Surveys completed 83

Response rate 23%

Page 25: C A R D I O L O G YThe independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark ... Journal of the Amer. Col. of Card. – INTVCD 8 Journal of the Amer. Soc. of Echocardiography 8 Cleveland

Rheumatologists spend significant time reading essential journals ___________________________________________________________________

AVERAGE TIME SPENT READING EACH ISSUE (MINUTES)

ESSENTIAL 32 minsSECONDARY 16

They read essential journals soon after receiving them___________________________________________________________________

% WHO READ THEIR ISSUES WITHIN THREE DAYS

ESSENTIAL 40% SECONDARY 32

They re-read essential journals ___________________________________________________________________

% WHO RE-READ THEIR ISSUES TWO OR MORE TIMES

ESSENTIAL 24% SECONDARY 15

They find valuable content in essential journals___________________________________________________________________

% OF ISSUES OFFERING VALUABLE INFORMATION FOR THEIR WORK

ESSENTIAL 49% SECONDARY 28

They are more likely to look at ads in essential journals ___________________________________________________________________

% WHO ARE CERTAIN, VERY LIKELY, OR SOMEWHAT LIKELY TO LOOK AT ADS

ESSENTIAL 53% SECONDARY 46

The independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark

study of the journals that rheumatologists consider essential

to their practice. Consistent with past studies, these rheuma-

tologists draw a clear distinction between the top two essential

journals and the rest in their field. In addition, rheumatologists

spend more time reading essential journals, read them sooner,

and value their content more than their secondary journals.

Top Ten Essential Journals ___________________________________________________________________

Arthritis & Rheumatism 77%The New England Journal of Medicine 56Arthritis Care & Research 23Annals of Internal Medicine 19Rheumatology News 13Journal of the American Medical Association 13The Rheumatologist 12Journal of Rheumatology 9Annals of Rheumatic Diseases 4Current Opinions in Rheumatology 4

Top Five Secondary Journals ___________________________________________________________________

Journal of the American Medical Association 18%Journal of Rheumatology 18Annals of Internal Medicine 15Annals of Rheumatic Diseases 9Arthritis & Rheumatism 7

Response rate: 26% or 70 of 274 surveys returned.

HOW RHEUMATOLOGISTS USE AND VALUE ESSENTIAL JOURNALS

2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y

R H E U M A T O L O G Y

Page 26: C A R D I O L O G YThe independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark ... Journal of the Amer. Col. of Card. – INTVCD 8 Journal of the Amer. Soc. of Echocardiography 8 Cleveland

Methodology___________________________________________________________________

This independent study was delivered to 274 rheumatolo-gists selected at random from the Direct Medical Data list. This was an unaided-recall study and did not include names or photographs of journals. The Matalia Group, an independent research organization, conducted the study using accepted research methodology.

To find out more___________________________________________________________________

Chrissy Miller (508) 775-3995; [email protected] Bridgeman (781) 775-1287; [email protected] Ainley (773) 327-5917; [email protected] McGuire (973) 771-8926; [email protected]

... or visit NEJMadsales.org.

Why rheumatologists value essential journals___________________________________________________________________

% WHO AGREE WITH THESE STATEMENTS

The articles influence my clinical decisions.

AR&RH 82%NEJM 82

The articles report on medical breakthroughs.

AR&RH 82%NEJM 80

The journal offers a balance of cutting-edge and review articles.

NEJM 72% AR&RH 57

The journal helps me with emerging clinical challenges.

AR&RH 70%NEJM 67

The journal is useful in making therapeutic choices.

AR&RH 70%NEJM 54

2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y R H E U M A T O L O G Y

RHEUMATOLOGY____________________________

Surveys delivered 274

Surveys completed 70

Response rate 26%