Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark
study of the journals that cardiologists consider essential to their
practice. Consistent with past studies, these cardiologists draw
a clear distinction between the top two essential journals and
the rest in their field. In addition, cardiologists spend more time
reading essential journals, read them sooner, and value their
content more than their secondary journals.
Top Ten Essential Journals ___________________________________________________________________
Journal of the American College of Cardiology 87%The New England Journal of Medicine 60Circulation 23Journal of the American Medical Association 20American Journal of Cardiology 10Annals of Internal Medicine 8Journal of the Amer. Col. of Card. – INTVCD 8Journal of the Amer. Soc. of Echocardiography 8Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine 3Heart.org 3
Top Five Secondary Journals ___________________________________________________________________
American Journal of Cardiology 27%Journal of the American Medical Association 24The New England Journal of Medicine 17Mayo Clinic Proceedings 10Medical Economics 9
Response rate: 19% or 90 of 479 surveys returned.
Cardiologists spend significant time reading essential journals ___________________________________________________________________
AVERAGE TIME SPENT READING EACH ISSUE (MINUTES)
ESSENTIAL 30 minsSECONDARY 18
They read essential journals soon after receiving them___________________________________________________________________
% WHO READ THEIR ISSUES WITHIN THREE DAYS
ESSENTIAL 47% SECONDARY 28
They re-read essential journals ___________________________________________________________________
% WHO RE-READ THEIR ISSUES TWO OR MORE TIMES
ESSENTIAL 12% SECONDARY 5
They find valuable content in essential journals___________________________________________________________________
% OF ISSUES OFFERING VALUABLE INFORMATION FOR THEIR WORK
ESSENTIAL 48% SECONDARY 30
They are more likely to look at ads in essential journals ___________________________________________________________________
% WHO ARE CERTAIN, VERY LIKELY, OR SOMEWHAT LIKELY TO LOOK AT ADS
ESSENTIAL 42% SECONDARY 36
HOW CARDIOLOGISTS USE AND VALUE ESSENTIAL JOURNALS
2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y
C A R D I O L O G Y
Why cardiologists value essential journals___________________________________________________________________
% WHO AGREE WITH THESE STATEMENTS
The articles influence my clinical decisions.
NEJM 89% JACC 87CIRC 67
The articles report on medical breakthroughs.
NEJM 89% JACC 78CIRC 67
The journal offers a balance of cutting-edge and review articles.
JACC 86% CIRC 76NEJM 72
The journal helps me with emerging clinical challenges.
JACC 68%NEJM 57 CIRC 48
The journal is useful in making therapeutic choices.
JACC 67%NEJM 63 CIRC 57
2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y C A R D I O L O G Y
Methodology___________________________________________________________________
This independent study was delivered to 479 cardiologists selected at random from the Direct Medical Data list. This was an unaided-recall study and did not include names or photographs of journals. The Matalia Group, an independent research organization, conducted the study using accepted research methodology.
To find out more___________________________________________________________________
Chrissy Miller (508) 775-3995; [email protected] Bridgeman (781) 775-1287; [email protected] Ainley (773) 327-5917; [email protected] McGuire (973) 771-8926; [email protected]
... or visit NEJMadsales.org.
CARDIOLOGY____________________________
Surveys delivered 479
Surveys completed 90
Response rate 19%
HOW ENDOCRINOLOGISTS USE AND VALUE ESSENTIAL JOURNALS
The independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark
study of the journals that endocrinologists consider essential
to their practice. Consistent with past studies, these endocrin-
ologists draw a clear distinction between the top two essential
journals and the rest in their field. In addition, endocrinologists
spend more time reading essential journals, read them sooner,
and value their content more than their secondary journals.
Top Ten Essential Journals ___________________________________________________________________
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 76%The New England Journal of Medicine 57Diabetes Care 26Endocrine Practice 22Annals of Internal Medicine 18Journal of the American Medical Association 18Thyroid 8Endocrine News 7Endocrine Today 7Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine 3
Top Five Secondary Journals ___________________________________________________________________
Journal of the American Medical Association 18%Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine 13Mayo Clinic Proceedings 13Annals of Internal Medicine 12Lancet 12
Response rate: 24% or 75 of 316 surveys returned.
Endocrinologists spend significant time reading essential journals ___________________________________________________________________
AVERAGE TIME SPENT READING EACH ISSUE (MINUTES)
ESSENTIAL 31 minsSECONDARY 22
They read essential journals soon after receiving them___________________________________________________________________
% WHO READ THEIR ISSUES WITHIN THREE DAYS
ESSENTIAL 41% SECONDARY 25
They re-read essential journals ___________________________________________________________________
% WHO RE-READ THEIR ISSUES TWO OR MORE TIMES
ESSENTIAL 17% SECONDARY 5
They find valuable content in essential journals___________________________________________________________________
% OF ISSUES OFFERING VALUABLE INFORMATION FOR THEIR WORK
ESSENTIAL 51% SECONDARY 35
They are more likely to look at ads in essential journals ___________________________________________________________________
% WHO ARE CERTAIN, VERY LIKELY, OR SOMEWHAT LIKELY TO LOOK AT ADS
ESSENTIAL 56% SECONDARY 43
2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y
E N D O C R I N O L O G Y
2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y E N D O C R I N O L O G Y
Methodology___________________________________________________________________
This independent study was delivered to 316 endocrinolo-gists selected at random from the Direct Medical Data list. This was an unaided-recall study and did not include names or photographs of journals. The Matalia Group, an independent research organiza-tion, conducted the study using accepted research methodology.
To find out more___________________________________________________________________
Chrissy Miller (508) 775-3995; [email protected] Bridgeman (781) 775-1287; [email protected] Ainley (773) 327-5917; [email protected] McGuire (973) 771-8926; [email protected]
... or visit NEJMadsales.org.
ENDOCRINOLOGY____________________________
Surveys delivered 316
Surveys completed 75
Response rate 24%
Why endocrinologists value essential journals___________________________________________________________________
% WHO AGREE WITH THESE STATEMENTS
The articles influence my clinical decisions.
DC 85%JCEM 83 NEJM 63
The articles report on medical breakthroughs.
NEJM 91% JCEM 67DC 50
The journal offers a balance of cutting-edge and review articles.
NEJM 77% JCEM 76DC 70
The journal helps me with emerging clinical challenges.
DC 70% JCEM 60NEJM 51
The journal is useful in making therapeutic choices.
DC 90%JCEM 71NEJM 61
HOW GASTROENTEROLOGISTS USE AND VALUE ESSENTIAL JOURNALS
The independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark
study of the journals that gastroenterologists consider essential
to their practice. Consistent with past studies, these gastroenter-
ologists draw a clear distinction between the top five essential
journals and the rest in their field. In addition, gastroenterologists
spend more time reading essential journals, read them sooner,
and value their content more than their secondary journals.
Top Ten Essential Journals ___________________________________________________________________
American Journal of Gastroenterology 58%Gastroenterology 54Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 46Clinical Gastroenterology & Hepatology 39The New England Journal of Medicine 37Gastroenterology & Hepatology 12Annals of Internal Medicine 10Hepatology 9Practical Gastroenterology 9Journal of Pediatric Gastro & Nutrition 3
Top Five Secondary Journals ___________________________________________________________________
The New England Journal of Medicine 17%Practical Gastroenterology 17Journal of the American Medical Association 16Annals of Internal Medicine 13Gastroenterology & Hepatology 11
Response rate: 21% or 90 of 424 surveys returned.
Gastroenterologists spend significant time reading essential journals ___________________________________________________________________
AVERAGE TIME SPENT READING EACH ISSUE (MINUTES)
ESSENTIAL 37 minsSECONDARY 17
They read essential journals soon after receiving them___________________________________________________________________
% WHO READ THEIR ISSUES WITHIN THREE DAYS
ESSENTIAL 37% SECONDARY 14
They re-read essential journals ___________________________________________________________________
% WHO RE-READ THEIR ISSUES TWO OR MORE TIMES ESSENTIAL 26% SECONDARY 6
They find valuable content in essential journals___________________________________________________________________
% OF ISSUES OFFERING VALUABLE INFORMATION FOR THEIR WORK
ESSENTIAL 46% SECONDARY 27
They are more likely to look at ads in essential journals ___________________________________________________________________
% WHO ARE CERTAIN, VERY LIKELY, OR SOMEWHAT LIKELY TO LOOK AT ADS
ESSENTIAL 56% SECONDARY 43
2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y
G A S T R O E N T E R O L O G Y
Why gastroenterologists value essential journals___________________________________________________________________
% WHO AGREE WITH THESE STATEMENTS
The articles influence my clinical decisions.
AJGAST 90%GE 81GAST 71
The articles report on medical breakthroughs.
GAST 69% GE 63 AJGAST 54
The journal offers a balance of cutting-edge and review articles.
AJGAST 92%GAST 78 GE 76The journal helps me with emerging clinical challenges.
AJGAST 67%GE 63GAST 45
The journal is useful in making therapeutic choices.
AJGAST 83%GE 78GAST 57
2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y G A S T R O E N T E R O L O G Y
Methodology___________________________________________________________________
This independent study was delivered to 424 gastroenter-ologists selected at random from the Direct Medical Data list. This was an unaided-recall study and did not include names or photo-graphs of journals. The Matalia Group, an independent research organization, conducted the study using accepted research methodology.
To find out more___________________________________________________________________
Chrissy Miller (508) 775-3995; [email protected] Bridgeman (781) 775-1287; [email protected] Ainley (773) 327-5917; [email protected] McGuire (973) 771-8926; [email protected]
... or visit NEJMadsales.org.
GASTROENTEROLOGY____________________________
Surveys delivered 424
Surveys completed 90
Response rate 21%
The independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark
study of the journals that hematologists consider essential to
their practice. Consistent with past studies, these hematologists
draw a clear distinction between the top three essential journals
and the rest in their field. In addition, hematologists spend more
time reading essential journals, read them sooner, and value
their content more than their secondary journals.
Top Ten Essential Journals ___________________________________________________________________
Blood 69%Journal of Clinical Oncology 65The New England Journal of Medicine 60Journal of the American Medical Association 11Biology of Bone & Marrow Transplantation 7The ASCO Post 6British Journal of Hematology 6Journal of Thrombosis & Haemostasis 6Lancet Oncology 6Annals of Internal Medicine 4
Top Five Secondary Journals ___________________________________________________________________
The Oncologist 18%The New England Journal of Medicine 17Annals of Internal Medicine 13Journal of the American Medical Association 13Lancet 11
Response rate: 25% or 72 of 283 surveys returned.
HOW HEMATOLOGISTS USE AND VALUE ESSENTIAL JOURNALS
Hematologists spend significant time reading essential journals ___________________________________________________________________
AVERAGE TIME SPENT READING EACH ISSUE (MINUTES)
ESSENTIAL 32 minsSECONDARY 19
They read essential journals soon after receiving them___________________________________________________________________
% WHO READ THEIR ISSUES WITHIN THREE DAYS
ESSENTIAL 45% SECONDARY 34
They re-read essential journals ___________________________________________________________________
% WHO RE-READ THEIR ISSUES TWO OR MORE TIMES
ESSENTIAL 26% SECONDARY 13
They find valuable content in essential journals___________________________________________________________________
% OF ISSUES OFFERING VALUABLE INFORMATION FOR THEIR WORK
ESSENTIAL 46% SECONDARY 30
They are more likely to look at ads in essential journals ___________________________________________________________________
% WHO ARE CERTAIN, VERY LIKELY, OR SOMEWHAT LIKELY TO LOOK AT ADS
ESSENTIAL 36% SECONDARY 14
2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y
H E M A T O L O G Y
Why hematologists value Essential journals___________________________________________________________________
% WHO AGREE WITH THESE STATEMENTS
The articles influence my clinical decisions.
NEJM 94% BLOOD 90JCO 77
The articles report on medical breakthroughs.
JCO 86%BLOOD 70NEJM 70
The journal offers a balance of cutting-edge and review articles.
BLOOD 80%JCO 77 NEJM 66
The journal helps me with emerging clinical challenges.
BLOOD 44%JCO 40 NEJM 34
The journal is useful in making therapeutic choices.
NEJM 75%BLOOD 70JCO 56
2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y H E M A T O L O G Y
Methodology___________________________________________________________________
This independent study was delivered to 283 hematologists selected at random from the Direct Medical Data list. This was an unaided-recall study and did not include names or photographs of journals. The Matalia Group, an independent research organization, conducted the study using accepted research methodology.
To find out more___________________________________________________________________
Chrissy Miller (508) 775-3995; [email protected] Bridgeman (781) 775-1287; [email protected] Ainley (773) 327-5917; [email protected] McGuire (973) 771-8926; [email protected]
... or visit NEJMadsales.org.
HEMATOLOGY____________________________
Surveys delivered 283
Surveys completed 72
Response rate 25%
The independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark
study of the journals that hematologist/oncologists consider
essential to their practice. Consistent with past studies, these
hematologist/oncologists draw a clear distinction between the
top three essential journals and the rest in their field. In addition,
hematologist/oncologists spend more time reading essential
journals, read them sooner, and value their content more than
their secondary journals.
Top Ten Essential Journals ___________________________________________________________________
Journal of Clinical Oncology 84%The New England Journal of Medicine 72Blood 47Journal of the American Medical Association 28Jour. of the Natl. Comp. Cancer Network 9Annals of Internal Medicine 5The ASCO Post 5Hemonc Today 6Lancet 5Lancet Oncology 5
Top Five Secondary Journals ___________________________________________________________________
Journal of the American Medical Association 21%Annals of Internal Medicine 11Jour. of the Natl. Comp. Cancer Network 11The Oncologist 11Lancet Oncology 11
Response rate: 23% or 75 of 330 surveys returned.
Hem/oncs spend significant time reading essential journals ___________________________________________________________________
AVERAGE TIME SPENT READING EACH ISSUE (MINUTES)
ESSENTIAL 30 minsSECONDARY 22
They read essential journals soon after receiving them___________________________________________________________________
% WHO READ THEIR ISSUES WITHIN THREE DAYS
ESSENTIAL 40% SECONDARY 30
They re-read essential journals ___________________________________________________________________
% WHO RE-READ THEIR ISSUES TWO OR MORE TIMES
ESSENTIAL 17% SECONDARY 10
They find valuable content in essential journals___________________________________________________________________
% OF ISSUES OFFERING VALUABLE INFORMATION FOR THEIR WORK
ESSENTIAL 47% SECONDARY 34
They are more likely to look at ads in essential journals ___________________________________________________________________
% WHO ARE CERTAIN, VERY LIKELY, OR SOMEWHAT LIKELY TO LOOK AT ADS
ESSENTIAL 45% SECONDARY 47
HOW HEMATOLOGIST/ONCOLOGISTS USE AND VALUE ESSENTIAL JOURNALS
2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y
H E M A T O L O G Y /O N C O L O G Y
Why hem/oncs value essential journals___________________________________________________________________
% WHO AGREE WITH THESE STATEMENTS
The articles influence my clinical decisions.
JCO 87%BLOOD 80NEJM 74
The articles report on medical breakthroughs.
NEJM 96% JCO 84BLOOD 80
The journal offers a balance of cutting-edge and review articles.
NEJM 82% JCO 70BLOOD 66
The journal helps me with emerging clinical challenges.
JCO 62% BLOOD 60NEJM 57
The journal is useful in making therapeutic choices.
JCO 79% BLOOD 71NEJM 63
2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y H E M A T O L O G Y / O N C O L O G Y
Methodology___________________________________________________________________
This independent study was delivered to 330 hem/oncs selected at random from the Direct Medical Data list. This was an unaided-recall study and did not include names or photographs of journals. The Matalia Group, an independent research organization, conducted the study using accepted research methodology.
To find out more___________________________________________________________________
Chrissy Miller (508) 775-3995; [email protected] Bridgeman (781) 775-1287; [email protected] Ainley (773) 327-5917; [email protected] McGuire (973) 771-8926; [email protected]
... or visit NEJMadsales.org.
HEM/ONC____________________________
Surveys delivered 330
Surveys completed 75
Response rate 23%
Hospitalists spend significant time reading essential journals ___________________________________________________________________
AVERAGE TIME SPENT READING EACH ISSUE (MINUTES)
ESSENTIAL 31 minsSECONDARY 20
They read essential journals soon after receiving them___________________________________________________________________
% WHO READ THEIR ISSUES WITHIN THREE DAYS
ESSENTIAL 43% SECONDARY 23
They re-read essential journals ___________________________________________________________________
% WHO RE-READ THEIR ISSUES TWO OR MORE TIMES
ESSENTIAL 20% SECONDARY 13
They find valuable content in essential journals___________________________________________________________________
% OF ISSUES OFFERING VALUABLE INFORMATION FOR THEIR WORK
ESSENTIAL 49% SECONDARY 34
They are more likely to look at ads in essential journals ___________________________________________________________________
% WHO ARE CERTAIN, VERY LIKELY, OR SOMEWHAT LIKELY TO LOOK AT ADS
ESSENTIAL 46% SECONDARY 36
HOW HOSPITALISTS USE AND VALUE ESSENTIAL JOURNALS
The independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark
study of the journals that hospitalists consider important
to their practice. Consistent with past studies, these hospitalists
draw a clear distinction between the top three essential journals
and the rest in their field. In addition, hospitalists spend more
time reading essential journals, read them sooner, and value
their content more than their secondary journals.
Top Ten Essential Journals ___________________________________________________________________
The New England Journal of Medicine 51%Annals of Internal Medicine 32Journal of the American Medical Association 30Journal of Hospital Medicine 21Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine 14The Hospitalist 11American Family Physician 8NEJM Journal Watch 7Today’s Hospitalist 7Mayo Clinic Proceedings 6
Top Five Secondary Journals ___________________________________________________________________
Journal of the American Medical Association 20%Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine 10Today’s Hospitalist 10The New England Journal of Medicine 8ACP Hospitalist 6
Response rate: 25% or 95 of 377 surveys returned.
2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y
H O S P I T A L M E D I C I N E
Why hospitalists value essential journals___________________________________________________________________
% WHO AGREE WITH THESE STATEMENTS
The articles influence my clinical decisions.
ANIM 80% NEJM 77JAMA 75
The articles report on medical breakthroughs.
NEJM 79% JAMA 61ANIM 40
The journal offers a balance of cutting-edge and review articles.
NEJM 75%ANIM 70 JAMA 61
The journal helps me with emerging clinical challenges.
NEJM 73% JAMA 61ANIM 33
The journal is useful in making therapeutic choices.
ANIM 60% NEJM 58JAMA 50
2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y H O S P I T A L M E D I C I N E
Methodology___________________________________________________________________
This independent study was delivered to 377 hospitalists selected at random from the Direct Medical Data list. This was an unaided-recall study and did not include names or photographs of journals. The Matalia Group, an independent research organization, conducted the study using accepted research methodology.
To find out more___________________________________________________________________
Chrissy Miller (508) 775-3995; [email protected] Bridgeman (781) 775-1287; [email protected] Ainley (773) 327-5917; [email protected] McGuire (973) 771-8926; [email protected]
... or visit NEJMadsales.org.
HOSPITAL MEDICINE____________________________
Surveys delivered 377
Surveys completed 95
Response rate 25%
The independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark
study of the journals that ID specialists consider important
to their practice. Consistent with past studies, these ID
specialists draw a clear distinction between the top three
essential journals and the rest in their field. In addition,
ID specialists spend more time reading essential journals,
them sooner, and value their content more than their
secondary journals.
Top Ten Essential Journals ___________________________________________________________________
The New England Journal of Medicine 75%Clinical Infectious Diseases 74Journal of the American Medical Association 42Journal of Infectious Diseases 29Lancet Infectious Disease 19Annals of Internal Medicine 14Infectious Disease News 9Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 5Lancet 5Consultant 3
Top Five Secondary Journals ___________________________________________________________________
Journal of Infectious Diseases 24%Lancet Infectious Disease 22Journal of the American Medical Association 16Annals of Internal Medicine 15Lancet 11
Response rate: 20% or 92 of 458 surveys returned.
ID specialists spend significant time reading essential journals ___________________________________________________________________
AVERAGE TIME SPENT READING EACH ISSUE (MINUTES)
ESSENTIAL 30 minsSECONDARY 20
They read essential journals soon after receiving them___________________________________________________________________
% WHO READ THEIR ISSUES WITHIN THREE DAYS
ESSENTIAL 39% SECONDARY 21
They re-read essential journals ___________________________________________________________________
% WHO RE-READ THEIR ISSUES TWO OR MORE TIMES
ESSENTIAL 21% SECONDARY 10
They find valuable content in essential journals___________________________________________________________________
% OF ISSUES OFFERING VALUABLE INFORMATION FOR THEIR WORK
ESSENTIAL 49% SECONDARY 33
They are more likely to look at ads in essential journals ___________________________________________________________________
% WHO ARE CERTAIN, VERY LIKELY, OR SOMEWHAT LIKELY TO LOOK AT ADS
ESSENTIAL 40% SECONDARY 30
HOW ID SPECIALISTS USE AND VALUE ESSENTIAL JOURNALS
2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y
I N F E C T I O U SD I S E A S E
Why ID specialists value essential journals___________________________________________________________________
% WHO AGREE WITH THESE STATEMENTS
The articles influence my clinical decisions.
CID 87% NEJM 71JAMA 54
The articles report on medical breakthroughs.
NEJM 81% JAMA 67CID 62
The journal offers a balance of cutting-edge and review articles.
NEJM 81%CID 75 JAMA 56
The journal helps me with emerging clinical challenges.
CID 81% NEJM 49JAMA 41
The journal is useful in making therapeutic choices.
CID 82% NEJM 59JAMA 49
2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y I N F E C T I O U S D I S E A S E S
Methodology___________________________________________________________________
This independent study was delivered to 458 ID specialists selected at random from the Direct Medical Data list. This was an unaided-recall study and did not include names or photographs of journals. The Matalia Group, an independent research organization, conducted the study using accepted research methodology.
To find out more___________________________________________________________________
Chrissy Miller (508) 775-3995; [email protected] Bridgeman (781) 775-1287; [email protected] Ainley (773) 327-5917; [email protected] McGuire (973) 771-8926; [email protected]
... or visit NEJMadsales.org.
INFECTIOUS DISEASES____________________________
Surveys delivered 458
Surveys completed 92
Response rate 20%
The independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark
study of the journals that internists consider essential to their
practice. Consistent with past studies, these internists draw a
clear distinction between the top three essential journals and
the rest in their field. In addition, internists spend more time
reading essential journals, read them sooner, and value their
content more than their secondary journals.
Top Ten Essential Journals ___________________________________________________________________
The New England Journal of Medicine 60%Annals of Internal Medicine 44Journal of the American Medical Association 44Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine 13Medical Economics 10Consultant 9American Journal of Medicine 8Internal Medicine News 8Mayo Clinic Proceedings 7American Family Physician 5
Top Five Secondary Journals ___________________________________________________________________
Journal of the American Medical Association 21%Mayo Clinic Proceedings 18Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine 16Internal Medicine News 11Medical Economics 9
Response rate: 21% or 80 of 376 surveys returned.
Internists spend significant time reading essential journals ___________________________________________________________________
AVERAGE TIME SPENT READING EACH ISSUE (MINUTES)
ESSENTIAL 25 minsSECONDARY 15
They read essential journals soon after receiving them___________________________________________________________________
% WHO READ THEIR ISSUES WITHIN THREE DAYS
ESSENTIAL 49% SECONDARY 39
They re-read essential journals ___________________________________________________________________
% WHO RE-READ THEIR ISSUES TWO OR MORE TIMES
ESSENTIAL 23% SECONDARY 12
They find valuable content in essential journals___________________________________________________________________
% OF ISSUES OFFERING VALUABLE INFORMATION FOR THEIR WORK
ESSENTIAL 41% SECONDARY 28
They are more likely to look at ads in essential journals ___________________________________________________________________
% WHO ARE CERTAIN, VERY LIKELY, OR SOMEWHAT LIKELY TO LOOK AT ADS
ESSENTIAL 34% SECONDARY 29
HOW INTERNISTS USE AND VALUE ESSENTIAL JOURNALS
2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y
I N T E R N A L M E D I C I N E
Why internists value essential journals___________________________________________________________________
% WHO AGREE WITH THESE STATEMENTS
The articles influence my clinical decisions.
ANIM 77%JAMA 71 NEJM 69
The articles report on medical breakthroughs.
NEJM 85%JAMA 54ANIM 51
The journal offers a balance of cutting-edge and review articles.
NEJM 73%ANIM 71 JAMA 69
The journal helps me with emerging clinical challenges.
JAMA 60% NEJM 54ANIM 51
The journal is useful in making therapeutic choices.
ANIM 57% NEJM 50JAMA 49
2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y I N T E R N A L M E D I C I N E
Methodology___________________________________________________________________
This independent study was delivered to 376 internists selected at random from the Direct Medical Data list. This was an unaided-recall study and did not include names or photographs of journals. The Matalia Group, an independent research organization, conducted the study using accepted research methodology.
To find out more___________________________________________________________________
Chrissy Miller (508) 775-3995; [email protected] Bridgeman (781) 775-1287; [email protected] Ainley (773) 327-5917; [email protected] McGuire (973) 771-8926; [email protected]
... or visit NEJMadsales.org.
INTERNAL MEDICINE____________________________
Surveys delivered 376
Surveys completed 80
Response rate 21%
The independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark
study of the journals that nephrologists consider essential to
their practice. Consistent with past studies, these nephrologists
draw a clear distinction between the top three essential journals
and the rest in their field. In addition, nephrologists spend more
time reading essential journals, read them sooner, and value
their content more than their secondary journals.
Top Ten Essential Journals ___________________________________________________________________
The New England Journal of Medicine 74%Journal of the Amer. Society of Nephrology 50Clinical Journal of the Amer. Soc. of Nephrology 37Journal of the American Medical Association 21American Journal of Kidney Diseases 19Annals of Internal Medicine 13Kidney International 10Nephrology News & Issues 7Seminars in Dialysis 6Journal of the Amer. Society of Hypertension 4
Top Five Secondary Journals ___________________________________________________________________
Annals of Internal Medicine 13%Journal of the American Medical Association 13Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 10American Journal of Kidney Diseases 9The New England Journal of Medicine 9
Response rate: 21% or 68 of 326 surveys returned.
Nephrologists spend significant time reading essential journals ___________________________________________________________________
AVERAGE TIME SPENT READING EACH ISSUE (MINUTES)
ESSENTIAL 28 minsSECONDARY 20
They read essential journals soon after receiving them___________________________________________________________________
% WHO READ THEIR ISSUES WITHIN THREE DAYS
ESSENTIAL 34% SECONDARY 27
They re-read essential journals ___________________________________________________________________
% WHO RE-READ THEIR ISSUES TWO OR MORE TIMES
ESSENTIAL 13% SECONDARY 10
They find valuable content in essential journals___________________________________________________________________
% OF ISSUES OFFERING VALUABLE INFORMATION FOR THEIR WORK
ESSENTIAL 45% SECONDARY 26
They are more likely to look at ads in essential journals ___________________________________________________________________
% WHO ARE CERTAIN, VERY LIKELY, OR SOMEWHAT LIKELY TO LOOK AT ADS
ESSENTIAL 60% SECONDARY 60
HOW NEPHROLOGISTS USE AND VALUE ESSENTIAL JOURNALS
2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y
N E P H R O L O G Y
Why nephrologists value essential journals___________________________________________________________________
% WHO AGREE WITH THESE STATEMENTS
The articles influence my clinical decisions.
CJASN 80%JASN 77 NEJM 76 The articles report on medical breakthroughs.
NEJM 90%JASN 65 CJASN 56
The journal offers a balance of cutting-edge and review articles.
NEJM 74% CJASN 64JASN 62
The journal helps me with emerging clinical challenges.
NEJM 60%JASN 47 CJASN 40
The journal is useful in making therapeutic choices.
CJASN 72% NEJM 66JASN 56
2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y N E P H R O L O G Y
Methodology___________________________________________________________________
This independent study was delivered to 326 nephrologists selected at random from the Direct Medical Data list. This was an unaided-recall study and did not include names or photographs of journals. The Matalia Group, an independent research organization, conducted the study using accepted research methodology.
To find out more___________________________________________________________________
Chrissy Miller (508) 775-3995; [email protected] Bridgeman (781) 775-1287; [email protected] Ainley (773) 327-5917; [email protected] McGuire (973) 771-8926; [email protected]
... or visit NEJMadsales.org.
NEPHROLOGY____________________________
Surveys delivered 326
Surveys completed 68
Response rate 21%
The independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark
study of the journals that neurologists consider essential to their
practice. Consistent with past studies, these neurologists draw
a clear distinction between the top two essential journals and
the rest in their field. In addition, neurologists spend more time
reading essential journals, read them sooner, and value their
content more than their secondary journals.
Top Ten Essential Journals ___________________________________________________________________
Neurology 77%The New England Journal of Medicine 31Continuum 17JAMA Neurology 17Annals of Neurology 14Journal of the American Medical Association 10Stroke 9Muscle and Nerve 7Neurology Today 7Epilepsia 5
Top Five Secondary Journals ___________________________________________________________________
Journal of the Amer. Medical Assoc. Neurology 20%The New England Journal of Medicine 11Annals of Nephrology 9Journal of the American Medical Association 7Neurology 7
Response rate: 25% or 80 of 325 surveys returned.
HOW NEUROLOGISTS USE AND VALUE ESSENTIAL JOURNALS
Neurologists spend significant time reading essential journals ___________________________________________________________________
AVERAGE TIME SPENT READING EACH ISSUE (MINUTES)
ESSENTIAL 35 minsSECONDARY 23
They read essential journals soon after receiving them___________________________________________________________________
% WHO READ THEIR ISSUES WITHIN THREE DAYS
ESSENTIAL 42% SECONDARY 30
They re-read essential journals ___________________________________________________________________
% WHO RE-READ THEIR ISSUES TWO OR MORE TIMES
ESSENTIAL 21% SECONDARY 16
They find valuable content in essential journals___________________________________________________________________
% OF ISSUES OFFERING VALUABLE INFORMATION FOR THEIR WORK
ESSENTIAL 51% SECONDARY 34
They are more likely to look at ads in essential journals ___________________________________________________________________
% WHO ARE CERTAIN, VERY LIKELY, OR SOMEWHAT LIKELY TO LOOK AT ADS
ESSENTIAL 59% SECONDARY 56
2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y
N E U R O L O G Y
Why neurologists value essential journals___________________________________________________________________
% WHO AGREE WITH THESE STATEMENTS
The articles influence my clinical decisions.
NEUR 84%NEJM 80
The articles report on medical breakthroughs.
NEJM 85% NEUR 81
The journal offers a balance of cutting-edge and review articles.
NEJM 80% NEUR 63
The journal helps me with emerging clinical challenges.
NEUR 71%NEJM 52
The journal is useful in making therapeutic choices.
NEUR 69%NEJM 64
2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y N E U R O L O G Y
Methodology___________________________________________________________________
This independent study was delivered to 325 neurologists selected at random from the Direct Medical Data list. This was an unaided-recall study and did not include names or photographs of journals. The Matalia Group, an independent research organization, conducted the study using accepted research methodology.
To find out more___________________________________________________________________
Chrissy Miller (508) 775-3995; [email protected] Bridgeman (781) 775-1287; [email protected] Ainley (773) 327-5917; [email protected] McGuire (973) 771-8926; [email protected]
... or visit NEJMadsales.org.
NEUROLOGY____________________________
Surveys delivered 325
Surveys completed 80
Response rate 25%
The independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark
study of the journals that oncologists consider essential to their
practice. Consistent with past studies, these oncologists draw
a clear distinction between the top two essential journals and
the rest in their field. In addition, oncologists spend more time
reading essential journals, read them sooner, and value their
content more than their secondary journals.
Top Ten Essential Journals ___________________________________________________________________
Journal of Clinical Oncology 79%The New England Journal of Medicine 64Blood 16Lancet Oncology 16Journal of the American Medical Association 14Lancet 11Seminars in Oncology 9Nature 9Annals of Internal Medicine 6Jour. of the National Comp. Cancer Network 6
Top Five Secondary Journals ___________________________________________________________________
Journal of the American Medical Association 24%The New England Journal of Medicine 16Annals of Internal Medicine 13Lancet Oncology 13Oncology 10
Response rate: 21% or 70 of 327 surveys returned.
HOW ONCOLOGISTS USE AND VALUE ESSENTIAL JOURNALS
Oncologists spend significant time reading essential journals ___________________________________________________________________
AVERAGE TIME SPENT READING EACH ISSUE (MINUTES)
ESSENTIAL 28 minsSECONDARY 16
They read essential journals soon after receiving them___________________________________________________________________
% WHO READ THEIR ISSUES WITHIN THREE DAYS
ESSENTIAL 47% SECONDARY 38
They re-read essential journals ___________________________________________________________________
% WHO RE-READ THEIR ISSUES TWO OR MORE TIMES
ESSENTIAL 17% SECONDARY 8
They find valuable content in essential journals___________________________________________________________________
% OF ISSUES OFFERING VALUABLE INFORMATION FOR THEIR WORK
ESSENTIAL 43% SECONDARY 28
They are more likely to look at ads in essential journals ___________________________________________________________________
% WHO ARE CERTAIN, VERY LIKELY, OR SOMEWHAT LIKELY TO LOOK AT ADS
ESSENTIAL 40% SECONDARY 33
2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y
O N C O L O G Y
Why oncologists value essential journals___________________________________________________________________
% WHO AGREE WITH THESE STATEMENTS
The articles influence my clinical decisions.
NEJM 93% JCO 86
The articles report on medical breakthroughs.
JCO 86%NEJM 82
The journal offers a balance of cutting-edge and review articles.
JCO 71%NEJM 67
The journal helps me with emerging clinical challenges.
JCO 76%NEJM 73
The journal is useful in making therapeutic choices.
JCO 87%NEJM 76
2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y O N C O L O G Y
Methodology___________________________________________________________________
This independent study was delivered to 327 oncologists selected at random from the Direct Medical Data list. This was an unaided-recall study and did not include names or photographs of journals. The Matalia Group, an independent research organization, conducted the study using accepted research methodology.
To find out more___________________________________________________________________
Chrissy Miller (508) 775-3995; [email protected] Bridgeman (781) 775-1287; [email protected] Ainley (773) 327-5917; [email protected] McGuire (973) 771-8926; [email protected]
... or visit NEJMadsales.org.
ONCOLOGY____________________________
Surveys delivered 327
Surveys completed 70
Response rate 21%
The independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark
study of the journals that pulmonologists consider essential
to their practice. Consistent with past studies, these pulmon-
ologists draw a clear distinction between the top three essential
journals and the rest in their field. In addition, pulmonologists
spend more time reading essential journals, read them sooner,
and value their content more than their secondary journals.
Top Ten Essential Journals ___________________________________________________________________
Chest 86%The New England Journal of Medicine 63Amer. Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine 42Annals of Internal Medicine 19Sleep 17Critical Care Medicine 15Journal of the American Medical Association 12Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine 8Critical Care 5Journal of the Amer. Medical Association IM 5
Top Five Secondary Journals ___________________________________________________________________
Journal of the American Medical Association 17%The New England Journal of Medicine 16Annals of Internal Medicine 12Amer. Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine 10Mayo Clinic Proceedings 8
Response rate: 23% or 83 of 357 surveys returned.
HOW PULMONOLOGISTS USE AND VALUE ESSENTIAL JOURNALS
Pulmonologists spend significant time reading essential journals ___________________________________________________________________
AVERAGE TIME SPENT READING EACH ISSUE (MINUTES)
ESSENTIAL 33 minsSECONDARY 23
They read essential journals soon after receiving them___________________________________________________________________
% WHO READ THEIR ISSUES WITHIN THREE DAYS
ESSENTIAL 47% SECONDARY 33
They re-read essential journals ___________________________________________________________________
% WHO RE-READ THEIR ISSUES TWO OR MORE TIMES
ESSENTIAL 26% SECONDARY 12
They find valuable content in essential journals___________________________________________________________________
% OF ISSUES OFFERING VALUABLE INFORMATION FOR THEIR WORK
ESSENTIAL 44% SECONDARY 34
They are more likely to look at ads in essential journals ___________________________________________________________________
% WHO ARE CERTAIN, VERY LIKELY, OR SOMEWHAT LIKELY TO LOOK AT ADS
ESSENTIAL 43% SECONDARY 36
2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y
P U L M O N O L O G Y
Why pulmonologists value essential journals___________________________________________________________________
% WHO AGREE WITH THESE STATEMENTS
The articles influence my clinical decisions.
CHEST 90% AJRCCM 80NEJM 75
The articles report on medical breakthroughs.
NEJM 89% CHEST 59AJRCCM 46
The journal offers a balance of cutting-edge and review articles.
CHEST 78%NEJM 77 AJRCCM 69
The journal helps me with emerging clinical challenges.
CHEST 65%NEJM 58 AJRCCM 54
The journal is useful in making therapeutic choices.
CHEST 80%AJRCCM 69NEJM 62
2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y P U L M O N O L O G Y
Methodology___________________________________________________________________
This independent study was delivered to 357 pulmonolo-gists selected at random from the Direct Medical Data list. This was an unaided-recall study and did not include names or photographs of journals. The Matalia Group, an independent research organization, conducted the study using accepted research methodology.
To find out more___________________________________________________________________
Chrissy Miller (508) 775-3995; [email protected] Bridgeman (781) 775-1287; [email protected] Ainley (773) 327-5917; [email protected] McGuire (973) 771-8926; [email protected]
... or visit NEJMadsales.org.
PULMONOLOGY____________________________
Surveys delivered 357
Surveys completed 83
Response rate 23%
Rheumatologists spend significant time reading essential journals ___________________________________________________________________
AVERAGE TIME SPENT READING EACH ISSUE (MINUTES)
ESSENTIAL 32 minsSECONDARY 16
They read essential journals soon after receiving them___________________________________________________________________
% WHO READ THEIR ISSUES WITHIN THREE DAYS
ESSENTIAL 40% SECONDARY 32
They re-read essential journals ___________________________________________________________________
% WHO RE-READ THEIR ISSUES TWO OR MORE TIMES
ESSENTIAL 24% SECONDARY 15
They find valuable content in essential journals___________________________________________________________________
% OF ISSUES OFFERING VALUABLE INFORMATION FOR THEIR WORK
ESSENTIAL 49% SECONDARY 28
They are more likely to look at ads in essential journals ___________________________________________________________________
% WHO ARE CERTAIN, VERY LIKELY, OR SOMEWHAT LIKELY TO LOOK AT ADS
ESSENTIAL 53% SECONDARY 46
The independent 2015 Essential Journal Study is a benchmark
study of the journals that rheumatologists consider essential
to their practice. Consistent with past studies, these rheuma-
tologists draw a clear distinction between the top two essential
journals and the rest in their field. In addition, rheumatologists
spend more time reading essential journals, read them sooner,
and value their content more than their secondary journals.
Top Ten Essential Journals ___________________________________________________________________
Arthritis & Rheumatism 77%The New England Journal of Medicine 56Arthritis Care & Research 23Annals of Internal Medicine 19Rheumatology News 13Journal of the American Medical Association 13The Rheumatologist 12Journal of Rheumatology 9Annals of Rheumatic Diseases 4Current Opinions in Rheumatology 4
Top Five Secondary Journals ___________________________________________________________________
Journal of the American Medical Association 18%Journal of Rheumatology 18Annals of Internal Medicine 15Annals of Rheumatic Diseases 9Arthritis & Rheumatism 7
Response rate: 26% or 70 of 274 surveys returned.
HOW RHEUMATOLOGISTS USE AND VALUE ESSENTIAL JOURNALS
2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y
R H E U M A T O L O G Y
Methodology___________________________________________________________________
This independent study was delivered to 274 rheumatolo-gists selected at random from the Direct Medical Data list. This was an unaided-recall study and did not include names or photographs of journals. The Matalia Group, an independent research organization, conducted the study using accepted research methodology.
To find out more___________________________________________________________________
Chrissy Miller (508) 775-3995; [email protected] Bridgeman (781) 775-1287; [email protected] Ainley (773) 327-5917; [email protected] McGuire (973) 771-8926; [email protected]
... or visit NEJMadsales.org.
Why rheumatologists value essential journals___________________________________________________________________
% WHO AGREE WITH THESE STATEMENTS
The articles influence my clinical decisions.
AR&RH 82%NEJM 82
The articles report on medical breakthroughs.
AR&RH 82%NEJM 80
The journal offers a balance of cutting-edge and review articles.
NEJM 72% AR&RH 57
The journal helps me with emerging clinical challenges.
AR&RH 70%NEJM 67
The journal is useful in making therapeutic choices.
AR&RH 70%NEJM 54
2 0 1 5 E S S E N T I A L J O U R N A L S T U D Y R H E U M A T O L O G Y
RHEUMATOLOGY____________________________
Surveys delivered 274
Surveys completed 70
Response rate 26%