Upload
letitia-cross
View
220
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CALS Greenhouse Design Team
Team Green Thumb
Team Green Thumb
Fall 2012
Caitlin KeithJiangong LiBrian LocknerJosh Miller(From L to R)
CALS Greenhouse Design Team
Team Green Thumb Fall 2012
Background Information
The Client Sandpoint Urban Renewal Agency (SURA)
OpportunitiesCreate a year-round industry for locally grown
produce including warm weather vegetables
CALS Greenhouse Design Team
Team Green Thumb Fall 2012
Problem Statement
Propose and optimize a variety of cold weather greenhouse designs ranging from inexpensive to innovative that meet the growth requirements for a variety of crops.
Perform an economic analysis of estimated expenditures and returns for SURA and provide a scaled model of the final design.
CALS Greenhouse Design Team
Team Green Thumb Fall 2012
First Semester Flow Chart
Project Learning
Phase II Influence
Greenhouse Tours
SURA Influence
Structural Design
Internal Design
Economic Analysis
Team Green Thumb
CALS Greenhouse Design Team
Vegetable Zones
Vegetable groupings based on plant growth requirements.
Factors Considered:
•Temperature ranges
•Humidity
Fall 2012
Project Learning
Zone A Vegetables Zone B Vegetables Zone C Vegetables
day - 50-70 F Broccoli day - 60-85 F beans day - 60-85*F cucumbers
night - 45-55 F Cabbage night - 55-65 F zuccini/squash night - 55-65*F peppers 45-60% shumidity Cauliflower melons high humidity tomatoes
chard strawberries
leaf lettuce tarragon
radish
spinach
garlic
kale
herbs and spices
Team Green Thumb
CALS Greenhouse Design Team
Air Distribution
Air Circulation is vital to temperature and humidity control.
Stagnant air can result in crop mildew and infectious disease
Fall 2012
Project Learning
Team Green Thumb
CALS Greenhouse Design Team
Material Pros and Cons
Important Considerations:
•Cost
•Rigidity
•Useful Life
•Light Penetration
Fall 2012
Project Learning
Greenhouse materials Pros and Cons
Items Advantages Disadvantages Light pass Age limitPolycarbonate High
TemperatureImpact
ResistanceLow
flammability
Easily scratchedHigh coefficient of thermal expansion
Yellowing
79-87% 5-12yrs
FiberglassReinforced Polyester
Low priceHigh strength
Easy installation
Bad UV transmittanceLow pressure
resistance
60-88% 7-15yrs
Poly Films Easy installLow price
High transparency
Short useful lifespanNot rigid
90% 4yrs
Team Green Thumb
CALS Greenhouse Design Team
Azimuth Angles
Azimuth angles can be used to generalize the sun’s path through the sky as a function of latitude and time of year.
Fall 2012
Project Learning
CALS Greenhouse Design Team
Team Green Thumb Fall 2012
Design Alternatives
Inexpensive Design• Low Building Costs• Frequent MaintenanceConventional Design• High Yield• FunctionalityInnovative• High Yield• Energy Efficient• Largest Initial Investment
Team Green Thumb
CALS Greenhouse Design Team
Isometric View
Fall 2012
Inexpensive Design
Materials
•Polyethylene covering
•Aluminum Frame
•Native Flooring
•Natural Gas Heating
Specifications
Footprint: 15,000 ft2
Growing Space: 10,050 ft2
Energy Usage: 929 MW-hr
Team Green Thumb
CALS Greenhouse Design Team
Isometric View
Fall 2012
Innovative Design
Materials
•Polycarbonate shell
•Steel Frame
•Full Concrete Floor
•High-Efficiency Natural Gas Heating
Specifications
Footprint: 11,500 ft2
Growing Space: 7,700 ft2
Energy Usage: 591 MW-hr
Team Green Thumb
CALS Greenhouse Design Team
Isometric View
Materials
•Polycarbonate shell
•Steel Frame
•Full Concrete Floor
•High-Efficiency Natural Gas Heating
Specifications
Footprint: 18,225 ft2
Growing Space: 8,448 ft2
Energy Usage: 535 MW-hr
Fall 2012
Conventional Design
CALS Greenhouse Design Team
Team Green Thumb Fall 2012
Computer Modeling Data
• Engineering Equation Solver (EES)• Solved for heat loss in each design
Accounting for: materials, building geometry, climate conditions
• Solved for heating needs due to airflow Accounting for: elevation, climate conditions, plant needs
CALS Greenhouse Design Team
Team Green Thumb Fall 2012
Preliminary Economic Analysis
Inexpensive DesignPresent Worth = $510,416
Innovative DesignPresent Worth = $275,902
MARR = 6%
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
$0
$360,000 $360,000 $360,000
-$995,000
-$173,400 -$226,900 -$173,400
Cash Flow Diagram - Conventional
MARR = 6%Present Worth: $783,844
CALS Greenhouse Design Team
Team Green Thumb Fall 2012
Our Recommendations
Grow Organic• Bigger profit margins• Increasingly large niche marketUse Conventional Structure*• Simple construction• Relatively Low Initial Investment• High Yield* Non-monetary factors not considered
CALS Greenhouse Design Team
Team Green Thumb Fall 2012
Future Possibilities
• Automated Roof Venting• Solar Options• Automated “Heat Shade”• CFD CAD modeling• Hydroponic Irrigation
CALS Greenhouse Design Team
Team Green Thumb Fall 2012
Future WorkSpring 2013
Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1/7 1/14 1/21 1/28 2/4 2/11 2/18 2/25 3/4 3/11 3/18 3/25
Optimize Best Design
Detailed Economic Analysis
Model Planning and Design
Purchase Model Materials
Written Report
Model Construction
Week 13 14 15 16 17 18
4/1 4/8 4/15 4/22 4/29 5/6
Report, cont'd
Model cont'd
Poster Design
Expo Preparation
Design Expo
Final Exams